DOCSLIB.ORG

ORTHODONTIC DIALOGUE Orthodontic Dialogue, Summer 1997 Issue, Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ORTHODONTIC DIALOGUE Orthodontic Dialogue, Summer 1997 Issue, Dr ORTHODONTIC DIALOGUE Orthodontic Dialogue, Summer 1997 Issue, Dr. Gerald Nelson, Berkeley, CA Orthodontic treatment in the The palatal midline suture closes back, increasing the lower facial mixed dentition at about the age of 13 in girls, height, measured from nose to chin. “I’d like my daughter’s braces 16 in boys. This response is appropriate for the done now so we don’t have to deal The fronto-palatal suture closes at patient who has an average or short with it at age 13.” Orthodontists, around age 2. lower face height, but not appropri- pediatric dentists, and general den- The mandible is a single bone (no ate for the patient with a long lower tists have all heard this before. sutures) after the age of one. face height. Orthodontic clinicians know, how- Growth rates peak for girls at age The retrusive maxilla can be ever, that most patients who receive 13, boys age 15. brought forward if appropriate orthodontic care in the mixed denti- forces are applied to the maxillary tion will need a second phase of dentition. An example of this is the treatment in the permanent denti- use of a fixed expansion device on tion. Whether to render treatment the upper buccal segments, with in the mixed dentition requires hooks to accept elastics from a for- careful case selection and a thorough ward-pull headgear. We know such diagnosis and treatment plan. appliances will slip the maxilla for- The mixed dentition is the ward on its sutures. This is best developmental period after the per- done at an early age, as more sutures manent first molars and incisors are open.9 have erupted, and before the The narrow maxilla is often remaining deciduous teeth are lost. An interesting feature of dental associated with a posterior cross- 10 Phase I treatment is usually done development is the leeway space3 bite (figure 1). You may see the early in this period. The American (extra space under the primary sec- mandible shift out of centric Association of Orthodontists ond molars). The primary second relation laterally toward the cross- recommends all children should see molars are often larger than the bite side. This problem may cause an orthodontist by age 7. A favor- underlying second bicuspids. enamel wear or stress on the TMJ ably developing occlusion at this During the transition to the perma- and facilitate asymmetrical growth. 1 stage has these characteristics : nent dentition, this space is liberat- The treatment is likely to involve ed. This may provide some extra expansion of the maxilla at the The molar relationship is usually space, however, in many patients it suture. Mandibular skeletal prob- end-on (slightly forward of Class I), is lost as the permanent first molars lems are complicated by the fact and typically transforms into a Class drift forward to take up the slack. that the mandible has no sutures. I during the transition from the Growth occurs at the condyle, and mixed to the permanent dentition. Treatment strategies by surface apposition. We do not I Nicely aligned permanent incisors, Mixed dentition treatment know how to make a short often still sporting their mammel- goals often focus on skeletal rather mandible grow significantly more. ons, with rather short clinical than dental correction. To design a Researchers have studied functional crowns, and a 1-3 mm overbite treatment plan, the clinician must appliances and overjet. understand the growth and develop- (activator, bionator, Frankel, Twin- There will often be a small space ment patterns, and the known block), and can demonstrate only either mesial or distal to the primary effects of the chosen treatment 1-2 mm more mandibular growth 11 canines. modality. than control groups. We do not Jaw growth Skeletal problems Jaw growth affects orthodontic Three common skeletal prob- treatment, usually favorably, but some- lems are the protrusive, retrusive, or times unfavorably. When and how very narrow maxilla.4,5 The protru- much growth will occur is completely sive maxilla and dentition can be unpredictable. However, we know some affected by distal forces placed on useful facts about jaw growth in the the upper teeth.6 An example of this 2 mixed dentition : is the use of bonded or banded attachments on the upper molars Between the ages of 5-10 years, and incisors along with a headgear. the inter-canine dimension may If the force levels are about one know if such effects are permanent. increase by 3 mm (on the average). pound per side, and the patient uses We also don’t know how to make a After the age of 10, there are no the appliance 10-12 hours per day, long mandible grow less, or how to width increases. two things will happen. The upper make an asymmetrical mandible The space in the maxillary arch teeth will be moved distally within straighten out. When such problems (from molar to molar, traced the maxilla, and the maxilla will be are severe, the clinician will often through the contact points) increas- shifted distally on its sutures.7,8 With delay treatment until growth is es by an average of 2 mm. The the neckband, the force vector is complete, and consider change in the mandible varies from down as well as back, so the upper surgical/orthodontic correction. a decrease of 2 mm to an increase of molars may also extrude. This can Since the mandible cannot be 4 mm. tip the upper occlusal plane down in widened through sutural expansion, our ability to create space is limited. Another dental condition that the dental alignment can improve There is no research to show that we deserves attention is TMD. dramatically. However, the timing of can expand the mandibular dental Symptoms appear in some patients, the extractions has a potent effect on arch more than 3-4 mm with perma- and can be diagnosed and treated as the amount of spontaneous improve- nent results.12 Therefore, treatment with older patients. ment, so the clinician must be famil- strategies for crowding in the mixed iar with the limits and indications of dentition focus on saving the leeway Anomalies this maneuver.19 In almost every case, space under the deciduous second Cranio-facial anomalies present the serial extraction procedure is fol- molars, mild expansion, or serial some challenging skeletal discrepan- lowed by comprehensive orthodontic extraction of first bicuspid teeth cies. Most patients with facial defor- treatment in the permanent dentition (figure 2). mities (cleft palate, suture formation with fixed appliances. abnormalities) should be supervised Dental problems by a cranio-facial panel of experts. Many dental development prob- These panels are typically associated lems can be headed off in the mixed with a children’s or university hospi- dentition; for example, anterior cross- tal and will include a psychologist, bites (figure 3). In-time removal of a plastic surgeon, oral surgeon, ortho- deciduous tooth could prevent a dontist, speech therapist, etc. crossbite, but once the permanent upper incisor is caught on the lingual The late mixed dentition of the lower incisors, treatment is The transition period when the needed. The anterior crossbite can deciduous molars and canines are cause tissue damage around the exfoliating is often called the late affected lower incisor. mixed dentition. This is the classic Removal of permanent teeth is Another example is the displaced period to place a lower lingual arch less controversial than expansion to lower midline as a result of the early to save extra space under the decidu- provide room because research that loss of a lower deciduous canine. ous second molars.13,14 Some clini- supports expansion of the dental arch Removal of the opposing canine may cians advocate starting comprehensive is lacking.12 cause spontaneous correction of the orthodontic treatment during this Early correction of the Class II midline. Delayed exfoliation can have period. It gives you a head start on maxillary protrusion can be valid in a negative effect as well. The succeda- Class II correction in girls. some cases. We know that very pro- neous tooth may become seriously Normalizing jaw relationship as the trusive teeth increase the risk of trau- teeth erupt may guide them into bet- matic injury. We can usually expect ter occlusion, thus simplifying the better cooperation with headgear treatment. The downside of starting appliances when the patient is in the treatment at this age is extended preteen years. Gender is also an issue. treatment time. With some patients, Many girls’ facial growth is slowing the final eruption of the second down as the permanent teeth erupt. molars may be a couple of years after This limits the clinician’s ability to the late mixed dentition. use growth as an ally to correct the problem. While most clinicians uti- Controversy lize the above principles in deciding The two areas that remain con- whether or not to undertake a Phase displaced or impacted. troversial in the orthodontic literature I treatment, there remains conflicting A panogram will reveal many are treatment of crowding and of evidence that treatment of mild-to- aberrations of dental development, Class II malocclusions in the mixed moderate Class II problems is worth- such as missing teeth, supernumerary dentition. Is there a benefit to early while.15 teeth, impactions and displaced teeth. treatment for these problems? This Ankylosis of primary molars is a question has yet to be fully answered Final thoughts common finding in the mixed denti- by research.15,16,17,18 The AAO recommendation to tion. If the tooth is moderately sub- In the case of crowding, the clin- provide orthodontic screening or merged, leave it to exfoliate on sched- ician should at least supervise the referral by age 7 is well-founded.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Homologies of the Anterior Teeth in Lndriidae and a Functional Basis for Dental Reduction in Primates
    Homologies of the Anterior Teeth in lndriidae and a Functional Basis for Dental Reduction in Primates PHILIP D. GINGERICH Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 KEY WORDS Dental reduction a Lemuriform primates . Indriidae . Dental homologies - Dental scraper . Deciduous dentition - Avahi ABSTRACT In a recent paper Schwartz ('74) proposes revised homologies of the deciduous and permanent teeth in living lemuriform primates of the family Indriidae. However, new evidence provided by the deciduous dentition of Avahi suggests that the traditional interpretations are correct, specifically: (1) the lat- eral teeth in the dental scraper of Indriidae are homologous with the incisors of Lemuridae and Lorisidae, not the canines; (2) the dental formula for the lower deciduous teeth of indriids is 2.1.3; (3) the dental formula for the lower perma- nent teeth of indriids is 2.0.2.3;and (4)decrease in number of incisors during pri- mate evolution was usually in the sequence 13, then 12, then 11. It appears that dental reduction during primate evolution occurred at the ends of integrated in- cisor and cheek tooth units to minimize disruption of their functional integrity. Anterior dental reduction in the primate Schwartz ('74) recently reviewed the prob- family Indriidae illustrates a more general lem of tooth homologies in the dental scraper problem of direction of tooth loss in primate of Indriidae and concluded that no real evi- evolution. All living lemuroid and lorisoid pri- dence has ever been presented to support the mates (except the highly specialized Dauben- interpretation that indriids possess four lower tonid share a distinctive procumbent, comb- incisors and no canines.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Structure, Dental Anatomy, Eruption, Periodontium and Oral
    Oral Structures and Types of teeth By: Ms. Zain Malkawi, MSDH Introduction • Oral structures are essential in reflecting local and systemic health • Oral anatomy: a fundamental of dental sciences on which the oral health care provider is based. • Oral anatomy used to assess the relationship of teeth, both within and between the arches The color and morphology of the structures may vary with genetic patterns and age. One Quadrant at the Dental Arches Parts of a Tooth • Crown • Root Parts of a Tooth • Crown: part of the tooth covered by enamel, portion of the tooth visible in the oral cavity. • Root: part of the tooth which covered by cementum. • Posterior teeth • Anterior teeth Root • Apex: rounded end of the root • Periapex (periapical): area around the apex of a tooth • Foramen: opening at the apex through which blood vessels and nerves enters • Furcation: area of a two or three rooted tooth where the root divides Tooth Layers • Enamel: the hardest calcified tissue covering the dentine in the crown of the tooth (96%) mineralized. • Dentine: hard calcified tissue surrounding the pulp and underlying the enamel and cementum. Makes up the bulk of the tooth, (70%) mineralized. Tooth Layers • Pulp: the innermost noncalsified tissues containing blood vessels, lymphatics and nerves • Cementum: bone like calcified tissue covering the dentin in the root of the tooth, 50% mineralized. Tooth Layers Tooth Surfaces • Facial: Labial , Buccal • Lingual: called palatal for upper arch. • Proximal: mesial , distal • Contact area: area where that touches the adjacent tooth in the same arch. Tooth Surfaces • Incisal: surface of an incisor which toward the opposite arch, the biting surface, the newly erupted “permanent incisors have mamelons”: projections of enamel on this surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinary Dentistry Basics
    Veterinary Dentistry Basics Introduction This program will guide you, step by step, through the most important features of veterinary dentistry in current best practice. This chapter covers the basics of veterinary dentistry and should enable you to: ü Describe the anatomical components of a tooth and relate it to location and function ü Know the main landmarks important in assessment of dental disease ü Understand tooth numbering and formulae in different species. ã 2002 eMedia Unit RVC 1 of 10 Dental Anatomy Crown The crown is normally covered by enamel and meets the root at an important landmark called the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). The CEJ is anatomically the neck of the tooth and is not normally visible. Root Teeth may have one or more roots. In those teeth with two or more roots the point where they diverge is called the furcation angle. This can be a bifurcation or a trifurcation. At the end of the root is the apex, which can have a single foramen (humans), a multiple canal delta arrangement (cats and dogs) or remain open as in herbivores. In some herbivores the apex closes eventually (horse) whereas whereas in others it remains open throughout life. The apical area is where nerves, blood vessels and lymphatics travel into the pulp. Alveolar Bone The roots are encased in the alveolar processes of the jaws. The process comprises alveolar bone, trabecular bone and compact bone. The densest bone lines the alveolus and is called the cribriform plate. It may be seen radiographically as a white line called the lamina dura.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Permanent Teeth(
    ro o 1Ppr4( SVsT' r&cr( -too c The Development of the Permanent Teeth( CARMEN M. NOLLA, B.S., D.D.S., M.S.* T. is important to every dentist treat- in the mouth of different children, the I ing children to have a good under - majority of the children exhibit some standing of the development of the den- pattern in the sequence of eruption tition. In order to widen one's think- (Klein and Cody) 9 (Lo and Moyers). 1-3 ing about the impingement of develop- However, a consideration of eruption ment on dental problems and perhaps alone makes one cognizant of only one improve one's clinical judgment, a com- phase of the development of the denti- prehensive study of the development of tion. A measure of calcification (matura- the teeth should be most helpful. tion) at different age-levels will provide In the study of child growth and de- a more precise index for determining velopment, it has been pointed out by dental age and will contribute to the various investigators that the develop- concept of the organism as a whole. ment of the dentition has a close cor- In 1939, Pinney2' completed a study relation to some other measures of of the development of the mandibular growth. In the Laboratory School of the teeth, in which he utilized a technic for University of Michigan, the nature of a serial study of radiographs of the same growth and development has been in- individual. It became apparent that a vestigated by serial examination of the similar study should be conducted in same children at yearly intervals, utiliz- order to obtain information about all of ing a set of objective measurements the teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Integration in the Hominin Dentition: Evolutionary, Developmental, and Functional Factors
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01508.x MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE HOMININ DENTITION: EVOLUTIONARY, DEVELOPMENTAL, AND FUNCTIONAL FACTORS Aida Gomez-Robles´ 1,2 and P. David Polly3 1Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research, Adolf Lorenz Gasse 2, A-3422 Altenberg, Austria 2E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 3Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, 1001 East 10th Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 Received June 29, 2011 Accepted October 19, 2011 As the most common and best preserved remains in the fossil record, teeth are central to our understanding of evolution. However, many evolutionary analyses based on dental traits overlook the constraints that limit dental evolution. These constraints are di- verse, ranging from developmental interactions between the individual elements of a homologous series (the whole dentition) to functional constraints related to occlusion. This study evaluates morphological integration in the hominin dentition and its effect on dental evolution in an extensive sample of Plio- and Pleistocene hominin teeth using geometric morphometrics and phyloge- netic comparative methods. Results reveal that premolars and molars display significant levels of covariation; that integration is stronger in the mandibular dentition than in the maxillary dentition; and that antagonist teeth, especially first molars, are strongly integrated. Results also show an association of morphological integration and evolution. Stasis is observed in elements with strong functional and/or developmental interactions, namely in first molars. Alternatively, directional evolution (and weaker integration) occurs in the elements with marginal roles in occlusion and mastication, probably in response to other direct or indirect selective pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • Allometric Scaling in the Dentition of Primates and Prediction of Body Weight from Tooth Size in Fossils
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 58%-100 (1982) Allometric Scaling in the Dentition of Primates and Prediction of Body Weight From Tooth Size in Fossils PHILIP D. GINGERICH, B. HOLLY SMITH, AND KAREN ROSENBERG Museum of Paleontology (P.D.G.)and Department of Anthropology (B.H.S. and K.R.), The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 KEY WORDS Primate dentition, Allometry, Body size, Adapidae, Hominoidea ABSTRACT Tooth size varies exponentially with body weight in primates. Logarithmic transformation of tooth crown area and body weight yields a linear model of slope 0.67 as an isometric (geometric) baseline for study of dental allometry. This model is compared with that predicted by metabolic scaling (slope = 0.75). Tarsius and other insectivores have larger teeth for their body size than generalized primates do, and they are not included in this analysis. Among generalized primates, tooth size is highly correlated with body size. Correlations of upper and lower cheek teeth with body size range from 0.90-0.97, depending on tooth position. Central cheek teeth (P: and M:) have allometric coefficients ranging from 0.57-0.65, falling well below geometric scaling. Anterior and posterior cheek teeth scale at or above metabolic scaling. Considered individually or as a group, upper cheek teeth scale allometrically with lower coefficients than corresponding lower cheek teeth; the reverse is true for incisors. The sum of crown areas for all upper cheek teeth scales significantly below geometric scaling, while the sum of crown areas for all lower cheek teeth approximates geometric scaling. Tooth size can be used to predict the body weight of generalized fossil primates.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Human Dentition … with Dental and Orthodontic Considerations
    Development of Human Dentition … with dental and orthodontic considerations Prenatal Infancy Early Childhood Childhood Late Childhood Adolescence & Adulthood (First twelve permanent teeth erupt) (Next twelve permanent teeth erupt) (Four twelve year molars erupt) 4 months Birth 18-30 6-7 9-10 12-15 in utero months years years years 6 months 4-8 2-3 7-8 10-11 21 in utero months years years years years 1. Anomalies in primary tooth 8-12 3-4 8-9 11-12 1. Trauma to the permanent dentition may cause A. Number C. Proportion months years years complications such as: B. Size D. Shape years A. Ankylosis C. Altered occlusion 2. Amelogenesis Impfecta of primary dentition B. Necrosis D. Reinforce sports mouthguard 3. Enamel Hypoplasia 2. Piercings 4. Cleft palate/lip development A. Source of infections B. Tooth fractures 5. Tetracycline Staining of primary teeth 3. TIME FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PHASE 2, AND LIMITED ORTHODONTICS 4. INVISALIGN 1. Untreated decay of primary dentition may cause 1. After age 8yrs, tetracycline antibiotics is not 9-15 4-5 5. Third Molars (Wisdom Teeth) typically evaluated months years complications to the permanent dentition contraindicated A. Enamel hypoplasia B. Space loss 2. Trauma to the permanent dentition may cause 2. TIME FOR INTERCEPTIVE AND PHASE 1 complications such as: ORTHODONTICS A. Ankylosis C. Altered occlusion B. Necrosis D. Reinforce sports mouthguard 3. IN BETWEEN PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 ORTHODONTICS 4. TIME FOR COMPREHENSIVE ORTHODONTICS 15-21 5-6 months years “Get A Great Smile For Life.” DANIEL J. GROB, D.D.S., M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke University Dissertation Template
    Lemur Teeth in Three Keys: Dietary Adaptation, Ecospace Occupation, and Macroevolutionary Dynamics by Ethan L. Fulwood Department of Evolutionary Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Doug Boyer, Supervisor ___________________________ Richard Kay, Chair ___________________________ Daniel McShea ___________________________ Blythe Williams ___________________________ Elizabeth St. Clair Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Evolutionary Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT iv Lemur Teeth in Three Keys: Dietary Adaptation, Ecospace Occupation, and Macroevolutionary Dynamics by Ethan Fulwood Department of Evolutionary Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Doug Boyer, Supervisor ___________________________ Richard Kay, Chair ___________________________ Daniel McShea ___________________________ Blythe Williams ___________________________ Elizabeth St. Clair An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Evolutionary Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Ethan Fulwood 2019 Abstract Dietary adaptation appears to have driven many aspects of the high-level diversification of primates. Dental topography metrics provide a means of quantifying morphological correlates of dietary adaptation
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Integration and Modularity in Pinnipeds Mieczyslaw Wolsan 1, Satoshi Suzuki2, Masakazu Asahara3 & Masaharu Motokawa4
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Dental integration and modularity in pinnipeds Mieczyslaw Wolsan 1, Satoshi Suzuki2, Masakazu Asahara3 & Masaharu Motokawa4 Morphological integration and modularity are important for understanding phenotypic evolution Received: 11 June 2018 because they constrain variation subjected to selection and enable independent evolution of functional Accepted: 26 February 2019 and developmental units. We report dental integration and modularity in representative otariid Published: xx xx xxxx (Eumetopias jubatus, Callorhinus ursinus) and phocid (Phoca largha, Histriophoca fasciata) species of Pinnipedia. This is the frst study of integration and modularity in a secondarily simplifed dentition with simple occlusion. Integration was stronger in both otariid species than in either phocid species and related positively to dental occlusion and negatively to both modularity and tooth-size variability across all the species. The canines and third upper incisor were most strongly integrated, comprising a module that likely serves as occlusal guides for the postcanines. There was no or weak modularity among tooth classes. The reported integration is stronger than or similar to that in mammals with complex dentition and refned occlusion. We hypothesise that this strong integration is driven by dental occlusion, and that it is enabled by reduction of modularity that constrains overall integration in complex dentitions. We propose that modularity was reduced in pinnipeds during the transition to aquatic life in association with the origin of pierce-feeding and loss of mastication caused by underwater feeding. Organisms are organised into multiple identifable parts on multiple levels. Tese parts are distinct from each other because of structure, function or developmental origins. Te fact that parts of an organism are distinguish- able refects their individuality and a degree of independence from each other.
    [Show full text]
  • It's Only Teething…
    OPINION personal view It’s only teething… A report of the myths and modern approaches to teething M. P. Ashley1 Paediatric dentistry is not my usual field of work. I am now based ter, come off best’. Gastrointestinal disorders and contamination of foodstuffs were more almost entirely in restorative dentistry and it is five years since I frequent in the summer. worked in the dental department of a children’s hospital. An essay In medieval times, animal substances on teething would appear to be an unusual choice of topic. With the were still being rubbed into the gums and current professional climate of ‘general professional education’ and teething infants were encouraged to chew ‘lifelong learning’ I can easily justify my time and effort studying a on hard objects such as roots. In 1429, Von Louffenberg, a German priest, summarised subject somewhat removed from my regular work. However, to be the care of a teething baby. completely honest, I have reached that age when many of my ‘Now when your baby’s teeth appear, you friends, relatives and colleagues are enjoying the sleepless nights must of these take prudent care. that accompany expanding families. Add to this the fact that I have For teething comes with grievous pain, so recently married into a family of midwives, health visitors, nurses to my word take heed again. When now the teeth are pushing and new mothers. I was not sure that I was giving the best, most up through, to rub the gums thou thus shall to date advice when asked about teething.
    [Show full text]
  • Anterior Dental Aesthetics: Gingival Perspective
    IN BRIEF • Gingival topography correlates with support from the teeth and underlying bone architecture. • Assessing periodontal biotype and bioform is a prerequisite for prosthodontic and implant treatment planning. • A classification of gingival progression of the anterior maxillary sextant is elementary for 5 creating optimal ‘pink aesthetics’. VERIFIABLE CPD PAPER Anterior dental aesthetics: Gingival perspective I. Ahmad1 The purpose of this series is to convey the principles governing our aesthetic senses. Usually meaning visual perception, aesthetics is not merely limited to the ocular apparatus. The concept of aesthetics encompasses both the time-arts such as music, theatre, literature and film, as well as space-arts such as paintings, sculpture and architecture. INTRODUCTION ANATOMY OF THE DENTOGINGIVAL COMPLEX The gingival perspective is concerned with the soft In cross section, the dentogingival complex is ANTERIOR DENTAL tissue envelope surrounding the teeth. The gingi- composed of three entities: the supra-crestal con- AESTHETICS val texture, shape, tooth-to-tooth progression and nective tissue attachment, epithelial (or junctional 1. Historical perspective its relation to the extra-oral tissues is interdepen- epithelium) attachment and the sulcus (Fig. 1). 2. Facial perspective dent on many factors. These include anatomy of The connective tissue fibres emanate from the 3. Dento-facial perspective the dentogingival complex, tissue hierarchy, osseous crest to the cemento-enamel junction 4. Dental perspective osseous crest considerations, periodontal biotype (CEJ), the epithelial attachment from the CEJ onto 5. Gingival perspective and bioform, tooth morphology, contact points, the tooth enamel, and coronal to the latter is the 6. Psychological perspective* tooth position (gingival progression), and extra- gingival sulcus or crevice.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Disorders of the Dentition: an Update OPHIR D
    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C (Seminars in Medical Genetics) 163C:318–332 (2013) ARTICLE Developmental Disorders of the Dentition: An Update OPHIR D. KLEIN, SNEHLATA OBEROI, ANN HUYSSEUNE, MARIA HOVORAKOVA, MIROSLAV PETERKA, AND RENATA PETERKOVA Dental anomalies are common congenital malformations that can occur either as isolated findings or as part of a syndrome. This review focuses on genetic causes of abnormal tooth development and the implications of these abnormalities for clinical care. As an introduction, we describe general insights into the genetics of tooth development obtained from mouse and zebrafish models. This is followed by a discussion of isolated as well as syndromic tooth agenesis, including Van der Woude syndrome (VWS), ectodermal dysplasias (EDs), oral‐facial‐ digital (OFD) syndrome type I, Rieger syndrome, holoprosencephaly, and tooth anomalies associated with cleft lip and palate. Next, we review delayed formation and eruption of teeth, as well as abnormalities in tooth size, shape, and form. Finally, isolated and syndromic causes of supernumerary teeth are considered, including cleidocranial dysplasia and Gardner syndrome. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. KEY WORDS: mouse; zebrafish; teeth; hypodontia; supernumerary teeth; craniofacial; syndrome How to cite this article: Klein OD, Oberoi S, Huysseune A, Hovorakova M, Peterka M, Peterkova R. 2013. Developmental disorders of the dentition: An update. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet 163C:318–332. INTRODUCTION with craniofacial developmental abnor- diagnostic findings in a number of Genetic causes have been identified for malities. Congenitally missing teeth syndromes. Additionally, mutations in both isolated tooth malformations and are seen in a host of syndromes, and several genes have been associated with for the dental anomalies seen in patients supernumerary teeth are also central both hypodontia and orofacial clefting Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant numbers: DP2‐OD00719, R01‐DE021420.
    [Show full text]