CD9 62 Email to Council Regarding Melmerby and Middleton Quernhow Parish Council Representations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

CD9 62 Email to Council Regarding Melmerby and Middleton Quernhow Parish Council Representations

From:Tony Collins <[email protected]> Sent:08 June 2020 14:18 To:Mike Parkes Cc:[email protected] Subject:Ripon MSA - 18/02713/EIAMAJ Afternoon Mike, I refer to the representations of Melmerby & Middleton Quernhow Parish Council 1 February 2020. The Parish Council has raised six matters which I comment upon as follows: 1.The relevant authorities have confirmed the proposed development is acceptable in respect of waste water; 2.The underground fuel tanks are protected against any leaks and will comply with the relevant legislation; 3.As you are Aware competition is not a planning matter. Leeming Bar has a lawfully implemented planning permission for an MSA but will continue to operate as a roadside service area. There is demand for a new MSA based on safety and welfare of motorway users. There is a significant gap in MSA provision between Wetherby and Scotch Corner; 4.Highways England and North Yorkshire Highway Authority have both confirmed the access to the MSA is acceptable; 5.Historically the Planning Inspector who conducted the 2012 Public Inquiry which considered all the MSA proposals on the A1(M) at that time recommended “Baldersby Gate” ie Ripon MSA for approval. The Secretary of State choose Leeming Bar as it already existed. Circular 02/2013 now has changed the regulations on the provision of more MSAs to serve the safety and welfare needs of motorists. The site for Ripon MSA is the best site for an MSA on this section of the A1(M); 6.As you will be aware MSAs are not destinations in their own right and serve only the passing traffic on the motorway for safety and welfare purposes. The food and other welfare offers within the MSA are de minimus in terms of scale and tend to be more expensive that other town centres outlets due to the fact that the MSA has to remain open 24/7 and 365 days per year. Moto’s experience is that there is less than 5% local trips generated art MSAs across the UK. There will no adverse impact on any retail centres as a result of the MSA. I trust this is of assistance. Kind Regards Tony Tony Collins MRICS MRTPI MCIT MILT MEWI Director Collins & Coward Ltd T: 01376 538533 F: 01376 563240 M: 07825 633573 E: [email protected] W: www.collinscoward.co.uk The Courtyard 9A East Street Coggeshall Essex CO6 1SH ------ This email has been scanned for spam and malware by The Email Laundry. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The London Gazette, 22Nd August 1980 11971
THE LONDON GAZETTE, 22ND AUGUST 1980 11971 and from a point 24 metres north-west of that junction to its junction with the London-Edinburgh Trunk Road for a distance of 195 metres measured along the centre Al; line of the road in a southerly direction ; 6. The Unclassified loop road in Middleton Quernhow 2. Kettlewell and Park Rash Unclassified County Road, village. south side, from its junction with the Aysgarth-Adding- A copy of the draft Order, together with a map and a ham Class II County Road B6160 for a distance of 80 Statement of the Council's reasons for proposing to make metres in an easterly direction. the Order, may by inspected at County Hall, Northallerton A copy of the proposed Order together with a map and at the Police Station, North Street, Ripon during showing the lengths of road affected and a Statement of normal office hours. the Council's reasons for proposing to make the Order may If you wish to object to the proposed Order, you should be inspected at County Hall, Northallerton, and at the send the grounds for your objection, in writing, to the N.Y.C.C. Area Office, Croft House, Carleton Road, Skipton undersigned by 12th September 1980. during normal office hours and also at the Post Office, W. A. Harrison, County Solicitor Kettlewell. County Hall, If you wish to object to the proposed Order you should Northallerton. (800) send the grounds for your objection in writing to the undersigned by 12th September 1980. W. A. Harrison, County Solicitor County Hall, NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Northallerton.
[Show full text]
Pedigrees of the County Families of Yorkshire
94i2 . 7401 F81p v.3 1267473 GENEALOGY COLLECTION 3 1833 00727 0389 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center http://www.archive.org/details/pedigreesofcount03fost PEDIGREES YORKSHIRE FAMILIES. PEDIGREES THE COUNTY FAMILIES YORKSHIRE COMPILED BY JOSEPH FOSTER AND AUTHENTICATED BY THE MEMBERS, OF EACH FAMILY VOL. fL—NORTH AND EAST RIDING LONDON: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED FOR THE COMPILER BY W. WILFRED HEAD, PLOUGH COURT, FETTER LANE, E.G. LIST OF PEDIGREES.—VOL. II. t all type refer to fa Hies introduced into the Pedigrees, i e Pedigree in which the for will be found on refer • to the Boynton Pedigr ALLAN, of Blackwell Hall, and Barton. CHAPMAN, of Whitby Strand. A ppleyard — Boynton Charlton— Belasyse. Atkinson— Tuke, of Thorner. CHAYTOR, of Croft Hall. De Audley—Cayley. CHOLMELEY, of Brandsby Hall, Cholmley, of Boynton. Barker— Mason. Whitby, and Howsham. Barnard—Gee. Cholmley—Strickland-Constable, of Flamborough. Bayley—Sotheron Cholmondeley— Cholmley. Beauchamp— Cayley. CLAPHAM, of Clapham, Beamsley, &c. Eeaumont—Scott. De Clare—Cayley. BECK.WITH, of Clint, Aikton, Stillingfleet, Poppleton, Clifford, see Constable, of Constable-Burton. Aldborough, Thurcroft, &c. Coldwell— Pease, of Hutton. BELASYSE, of Belasvse, Henknowle, Newborough, Worlaby. Colvile, see Mauleverer. and Long Marton. Consett— Preston, of Askham. Bellasis, of Long Marton, see Belasyse. CLIFFORD-CONSTABLE, of Constable-Burton, &c. Le Belward—Cholmeley. CONSTABLE, of Catfoss. Beresford —Peirse, of Bedale, &c. CONSTABLE, of Flamborough, &c. BEST, of Elmswell, and Middleton Quernhow. Constable—Cholmley, Strickland. Best—Norcliffe, Coore, of Scruton, see Gale. Beste— Best. Copsie—Favell, Scott. BETHELL, of Rise. Cromwell—Worsley. Bingham—Belasyse.
[Show full text]
Annual Monitoring Report 2016
Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 December 2016 Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 Harrogate Borough Council Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Harrogate context 3 3 Links with other council strategies and objectives 4 4 Local Plan update and the Local Development Scheme 5 5 Neighbourhood Planning 9 6 Duty to co-operate 10 7 Community Infrastructure Levy 11 8 Housing 12 9 Jobs and Business 24 10 Travel 31 11 Environment and Quality of Life 32 12 Communities 36 Appendices Appendix 1 Shop Vacancies 38 2 Harrogate Borough Council Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 The requirement to produce a Local Plan monitoring report is set out in the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, as amended by the Localism Act 2011. The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 provides more detail about what an authority should include in its annual monitoring report (AMR). 1.2 The AMR must be made available for inspection and put on the council's website. The Harrogate District Local Plan AMR 2016 covers the period from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016, but also, where appropriate, includes details up to the time of publication. 1.3 This AMR contains details relating to: the progress made on documents included in the Local Development Scheme (LDS); progress with Neighbourhood Plans; co-operation with other local planning authorities; the community infrastructure levy; monitoring indicators; and the availability of a five year housing land supply. Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 Harrogate Borough Council 3 Harrogate context 2 2 Harrogate context 2.1 Harrogate district (see picture 2.1) is part of the county of North Yorkshire and local government service delivery is split between Harrogate Borough Council and North Yorkshire County Council.
[Show full text]
Trinity Cottage, Middleton Quernhow, Nr Ripon, North Yorkshire, HG4 5HX Guide Price £410,000
Trinity Cottage, Middleton Quernhow, Nr Ripon, North Yorkshire, HG4 5HX Guide price £410,000 www.joplings.com A skillfully extended four bedroom detached family home set in a idyllic location surrounded by fields, offering modern spacious accommodation within easy access to Ripon, Thirsk and the A1(M). The property benefits from parking for numerous vehicles, a large garage and a small paddock. www.joplings.com DIRECTIONS STUDY 9'1 x 7'4 (2.77m x 2.24m) OUTSIDE Take the A61 out of Ripon towards Thirsk. Turn left in UPVC Double Glazed window to the Rear, overlooking the Shared driveway leads up to the property. Melmerby Green Lane, towards Melmerby. In Melmerby, take Paddock. Radiator. the right hand turn into Grange Terrace. Carry straight on this DOUBLE GARAGE 18'08 x 14'11 (5.69m x 4.55m) road, pass the centre of Middleton Quernhow into Coldstone FIRST FLOOR Double Timber doors. Power and Light. Consumer unit. Oil Lane. In the distance you will see three trees by the roadside. fired central heating boiler. The drive way is on the left hand side after the second tree. LANDING PARKING ENTRANCE Velux rooflight window. Loft access. Radiator. Five bar gate and pedestrian gate leads into the property Timber Front Entrance door leads into the Entrance Hall. MASTER BEDROOM 22'08max x 18'3 (6.91m x forecourt. Parking for numerous cars. Access to the Garage. ENTRANCE HALL 5.56m) GARDENS UPVC Double Glazed window to the Front. Tiled flooring. Dual aspect UPVC Double Glazed windows. Built in wardrobes. Gardens to all sides of the property with boundary fencing.
[Show full text]
Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes
Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland
[Show full text]
Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / Yorkshire and the Humber
HERITAGE AT RISK 2010 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 6 Publications and guidance 9 THE REGISTER 11 Content and assessment criteria 11 Key to the entries 13 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 16 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 41 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 41 North Lincolnshire (UA) 42 North Yorkshire 44 South Yorkshire 106 West Yorkshire 117 York (UA) 130 The Heritage at Risk Register helps us to identify the most threatened buildings, archaeological sites and landscapes in this most distinctive of English regions. For the 60% of listed buildings on this year’s Register that could have a sustainable future through commercial or residential reuse, the economic downturn has brought additional challenges to which we must now respond. This year, we undertook a pioneering 15% sample survey of England’s 14,500 listed places of worship to help us understand the condition of the thousands of designated churches, chapels, synagogues, mosques and temples and other faith buildings that are the spiritual focus for our communities. They face many different kinds of challenges and we need to ensure their future. In response to the expansion of asset types and changed Last year we included conservation areas in the Register economic conditions we have developed a new strategy. for the first time. This year, 46 of these, including Haworth, From now on we will focus our resources on types of Holbeck and Rotherham, are known to be at risk, site that make a particular contribution to the region’s but the survey of nearly 800 areas is proving a challenging character.
[Show full text]
2000 No. 2601 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
0 R STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000 No. 2601 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Borough of Harrogate (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Made---- 22nd September 2000 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) to (4) Whereas the Local Government Commission for England, acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(a), has submitted to the Secretary of State a report dated November 1999 on its review of the borough(b) of Harrogate together with its recommendations: And whereas the Secretary of State has decided to give effect, subject to one modiﬁcation, to those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by sections 17(c) and 26 of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Borough of Harrogate (Electoral Changes) Order 2000. (2) This article and articles 2, 3, 9 and 10 shall come into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on 2nd May 2002, on 10th October 2001; (b) for all other purposes, on 2nd May 2002. (3) Articles 4, 5 and 8 of this Order shall come into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to the election of parish councillors for the parishes of Boroughbridge, Killinghall and Whixley, respectively, to be held on 6th May 2004, on 10th October 2003. (b) for all other purposes, on 6th May 2004.
[Show full text]
The Scropfs of Bolton and of Masham
THE SCROPFS OF BOLTON AND OF MASHAM, C. 1300 - C. 1450: A STUDY OF A kORTHERN NOBLE FAMILY WITH A CALENDAR OF THE SCROPE OF BOLTON CARTULARY 'IWO VOLUMES VOLUME II BRIGh h VALE D. PHIL. THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY MAY 1987 VOLUME 'IWO GUIDE '10 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CALENDAR OF THE SCROPE OF BOLTON CARTULARY 1 GUIDE '10 Call'ENTS page 1. West Bolton 1 2. Little Bolton or Low Bolton 7, 263 3. East Bolton or Castle Bolton 11, 264 4. Preston Under Scar 16, 266 5. Redmire 20, 265, 271 6. Wensley 24, 272 7. Leyburn 38, 273 8. Harmby 43, 274, 276 9. Bellerby 48, 275, 277 10. Stainton 57, 157 11. Downholme 58, 160 12. Marske 68, 159 13. Richmond 70, 120, 161 14. Newton Morrell 79, 173 15. rolby 80, 175 16. Croft on Tees 81, 174 17. Walmire 85 18. Uckerby 86, 176 19. Bolton on Swale 89, 177 20. Ellerton on Swale 92, 178, 228, 230 21. Thrintoft 102, 229 22. Yafforth 103, 231 23. Ainderby Steeple 106, 232 24. Caldwell 108, 140, 169 25. Stanwick St. John 111, 167 26. Cliff on Tees 112 27. Eppleby 113, 170 28. Aldbrough 114, 165 29. Manfield 115, 166 30. Brettanby and Barton 116, 172 31. Advowson of St. Agatha's, Easby 122, 162 32. Skeeby 127, 155, 164 33. Brampton on Swale 129, 154 34. Brignall 131, 187 35. Mbrtham 137, 186 36. Wycliffe 139, 168 37. Sutton Howgrave 146, 245 38. Thornton Steward 150, 207 39. Newbiggin 179, 227 40.
[Show full text]
19/03854/FULMAJ Item No
Case No. 19/03854/FULMAJ Item No. 4 Location: Primrose House, Copgrove Road, Burton Leonard, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG3 3SJ Proposal: Partial demolition of Primrose House, demolition of commercial buildings and erection of 30 dwellings with alterations to access. Applicant: Wharfedale Homes Ltd Access to the case file on Public Access can be found here:- view file Reason for report: This application is to be presented to the Planning Committee as it was referred by the Ward Member due to local concerns over the increased number of dwellings compared with the approved development of 23 dwellings. SUMMARY The application site is currently occupied by Hymas Haulage Company and used as a haulage yard. The site has been thus occupied for many years, but the business is now relocating to a site at Ainderby Quernhow adjacent to the A1 (Ref 17/01712/FULMAJ). In 2018 planning permission was granted for the erection of 23 dwellings on this site under delegated powers (Ref 17/00525/FULMAJ). Permission was granted subject to a s106 agreement providing for on-site affordable housing and commuted sum payments for off-site Public Open Space. The development was largely supported by local residents as it involved the development of a brownfield site and the removal of a potential ‘bad neighbour’ in the centre of the village. The current application is for 30 dwellings. Concern has been expressed locally that the increased number of units will cause problems for highways and drainage. Nevertheless, the relevant statutory consultees have no objections. The proposed development is recommended for approval, subject to a new s106 agreement requiring the provision of on-site Affordable Housing and the payment of commuted sums towards Education provision, off-site Public Open Space and Village Halls.
[Show full text]
Heritage at Risk Register 2015, Yorkshire
Yorkshire Register 2015 HERITAGE AT RISK 2015 / YORKSHIRE Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 1 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 23 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 23 North Lincolnshire (UA) 25 North Yorkshire 27 Craven 27 Hambleton 28 Harrogate 33 North York Moors (NP) 37 Richmondshire 45 Ryedale 48 Scarborough 64 Selby 67 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 71 South Yorkshire 74 Barnsley 74 Doncaster 76 Peak District (NP) 79 Rotherham 80 Sheffield 83 West Yorkshire 86 Bradford 86 Calderdale 91 Kirklees 96 Leeds 101 Wakefield 107 York (UA) 110 II Yorkshire Summary 2015 e have 694 entries on the 2015 Heritage at Risk Register for Yorkshire, making up 12.7% of the national total of 5,478 entries. The Register provides an Wannual snapshot of historic sites known to be at risk from neglect, decay or inappropriate development. Nationally, there are more barrows on the Register than any other type of site. The main risk to their survival is ploughing. The good news is that since 2014 we have reduced the number of barrows at risk by over 130, by working with owners and, in particular, Natural England to improve their management. This picture is repeated in Yorkshire, where the greatest concentration of barrows at risk is in the rich farmland of the Wolds.
[Show full text]
2019 February Melmerby and Middleton Quernhow Parish
MINUTES OF THE PARISH COUNCIL MEETING OF MELMERBY & MIDDLETON QUERNHOW Monday 18th February 2019 7.30. Melmerby Village Hall 1. Those Present Chairman Cllr J Foster; Cllr K Blythe; Cllr T Richardson; Cllr P Kettlewell 2. Apologies of absence 3. Minutes of last meeting read and signed 4. Matters arising 5. Police Report none present 6. Update on service station nothing so far 7. Report from: Cllr Bateman ; Cllr Atkinson Cllr Bateman has had a busy year so far he feels the council is well run and they have set their precept. He has suggested if more development takes place at Barkers Business Park and Potters Business Park we might need to push harder for a roundabout at the junction of Melmerby Green Lane and the A61 Cllr Margaret Atkinson The Inspector has commented looking at the Harrogate District Plan and will come back with his findings, he has some suggestions to make and will come back by September. Cllr Atkinson has objected to County Council allowing building of houses on Industrial estates. Need 6.5 million each week to run Harrogate Council There have been no increases in Council member expenses for some time. One of the councillors has said we seem to get less value for money from the council than we used to. The money is wasted in the constant complaints that are never followed up whether it is drains or street lighting. People come and look and nothing happens. 8. Open forum What do we actually have to do about getting a roundabout? It would need to be part of building conditions.
[Show full text]
Local Government for England Report No
Local Government For England Report No. 312 LOCAL BOUNDARY COAliMISSICN FOR ENGLAND REPORT .NO. 3/2. LOCAL UOyhiUUiiiflT UOUULA.rt COKuAISLilOM FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB KBii DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEIVIBERS Lady Bov/den MrJ T Brockbank: Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB I)L Mr D P Harrison To the Rt Hon Merlyn Rees, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE BOROITGH OF HARROGATE IN THE COUNTY OF NORTH YORKSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the Borough of Harrogate in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972» present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough* 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 6 May 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to Harrogate Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to North Yorkshire County Council, parish councils and parish meetings in the borough, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies* 3.
[Show full text]