DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting TN/City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting CITY OF BANNING COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SECTION II. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Introduction This section of the EIR provides a general introduction to the environmental setting of the Banning Pass area, of which the City of Banning is at the center. Discussions are based on a regional perspective to provide a broad and comprehensive understanding of the issues associated with implementation of the proposed General Plan. Topics discussed include existing and surrounding land use patterns in Banning and the vicinity, regional climate, topography, soils and geology, and biological resources. Also addressed are air quality issues, cultural resources, traffic and circulation, visual resources, and public services and facilities. The City of Banning conducted an Initial Study in accordance with Section 15063, 15064, and 15065 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (see Appendix A). Issues identified as potentially significant in the Initial Study are analyzed in detail in Section III of this document. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) for this EIR was transmitted on January 7, 2005 and comments received are included in Appendix A of this document. The General Plan study area encompasses a total of approximately 23.2± square miles of incorporated City lands, including about 8.5± square miles of Sphere-of-Influence lands, and about 5.2± square miles outside the SOI and the City but within the General Plan study area. A. Existing Land Use Development in the City of Banning is focused primarily on the valley floor along U.S. Interstate 10 due to the dramatic topographic relief of the San Bernardino Mountains to the north and south, the Banning Bench in the north central portion of the City, and the Banning Water Canyon, which runs through the northeastern and east-central portions of the City. The current II-1 TN/City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting land use pattern in the City is characterized by a strong residential component, supported by local commercial and industrial development, with public and private open spaces interspersed throughout the City. Commercial and industrial land uses are generally clustered along U.S. I-10 and the Union Pacific Railroad, and near the Banning Municipal Airport. The General Plan study area consists of a total of 23,555± acres, of which 14,887± acres are in the City limits. Approximately 8,668 acres are in the City’s Sphere-of-Influence and unincorporated lands outside the sphere-of-influence referred to as the City’s “planning area.” Developed commercial lands include a variety of retail commercial establishments within the Ramsey Street corridor and the Downtown commercial area, as well as freeway-serving commercial such as fast food and gasoline stations. Developed commercial lands represent 8% (428± acres) of all developed lands in the General Plan study area. Developed lands designated as Industrial comprise approximately 10% (511± acres) of the total developed lands in the study area. These include airport-related uses, traditional industrial, ranging from light industrial to heavy manufacturing, and one operating sand and gravel facility. About 22% (5,168± acres) of the General Plan study area is developed. Residential land use represents about 66 % (3,415± acres) of developed lands, dominated by rural residential single- family dwelling units in the City limits and in the balance of the General Plan study area. Of the City’s total housing stock, about 79% (8,227 units), are attached and detached single-family homes, and approximately 21% (2,177 units) are multi-family units, including mobile homes. Public facilities, schools and other major community facilities comprise 5% (242± acres) of all developed lands in the General Plan study area. Under the existing General Plan no agricultural lands are specifically identified within the City limits, however Residential Agriculture (0-0.5 du/acre) and Rural Residential (0-1 du/acre) uses allow for agricultural and ranching activities. These two uses account for 1,608 acres in the City and 3,116 acres in the planning area. Also, approximately 1,101 acres are identified in the planning area as residential Agriculture, which allows for the construction of on dwelling unit per acres. Each of these agricultural related uses are accounted for in the land use calculations. Within the planning area, Open Space lands account for about 24% (5,577± acres) of the total study area; these include lands reserved for: existing and proposed parks and golf courses; natural resources, such as water and geological hazard; hillside preservation; conservation; and land reserved for recreation. Other Land Uses Under the current General Plan, less than 1% (426± acres) of lands within the study area are designated “Indian jurisdiction” are currently vacant and undeveloped. These occur outside the City limits and SOI lands. The existing General Plan designates land uses for which there is currently no General Plan land use designation as “Miscellaneous”, and these account for less than 1% (221± acres) of lands in the study area, and occur within the City limits. Neither of these land use designations are included in the Preferred Alternative. II-2 TN/City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting B. Surrounding Land Use The General Plan study area is bordered on the north by lands that occur within the County of San Bernardino, and lands within the San Bernardino National Forest. The County of Riverside and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians reservation border the City of Banning on the east. County lands consist of primarily of Conservation and Rural Mountainous (10 acre minimum), with some Agriculture, Rural Desert (10 acre minimum) and Rural Residential (5 acre minimum) land use designations. Land uses on Morongo tribal lands include commercial development comprised of a resort hotel and casino complex, commercial and highway-serving retail development, and residential, mixed use, industrial and public facilities associated with the reservation. Lands in the northern portion of the Morongo reservation, northeast of the planning area, are preserved as open space. The unincorporated Riverside County community of Cabazon occurs southeast of the planning area. To the south are lands primarily under the jurisdiction of Riverside County, areas subject to Indian jurisdiction, as well as public lands in the San Jacinto/Santa Rosa Mountains National Monument. Surrounding land uses under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside include a combination of Very Low Density Residential (1 ac minimum), Low Density Residential (0.5 ac minimum), Rural Mountainous (10 acre minimum) and Agriculture. Lands to the west are under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside and the City of Beaumont. Those lands that occur in Riverside County include Conservation, Very Low Density Rural Residential (1 acre minimum), Rural Mountainous (10 acre minimum), and a small portion of Morongo tribal land. Those lands that occur in the City of Beaumont and include a mix of residential, commercial, industrial and professional office, as well as institutional uses. Lands to the northwest are under the jurisdiction of Riverside County comprised of the community of Cherry Valley. Lands further northwest are under the jurisdiction of the County of San Bernardino. C. Topography The relief of the City of Banning is characterized by dramatic topographical contrasts. The largest portion of the City occupies the narrow, southeast-trending valley known as the San Gorgonio Pass, nestled between the San Bernardino Mountains to the north and the San Jacinto Mountains to the south. As the complex San Andreas fault system slices through San Gorgonio Pass, it separates the San Bernardino Mountains segment of the Transverse Ranges from the San Jacinto Mountains segment of the Peninsular Ranges. The Peninsular Ranges extends southward from the Los Angeles Basin to the tip of Baja California. The central and northern parts of the City extend into the foothills of the steep San Bernardino Mountains, with the northernmost portion lying inside the San Bernardino National Forest. Behind the foothills, the mountains rise abruptly to San Gorgonio Peak, which, with an elevation of 11,499 feet, is the highest peak in southern California. The San Jacinto mountains, which rise steeply from the southern margin of the City, has the second highest peak, the San Jacinto Peak, with an elevation of 10,804 feet. II-3 TN/City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting The Gorgonio Pass valley, extends westward from the Coachella Valley, rises to its highest elevation (approximately 2,600 feet) near Beaumont. Farther west, it merges with the Beaumont Plain and the San Timoteo Badlands. Within the City of Banning, elevations range from 2,080 feet above mean sea level in the eastern part of the Valley to about 5,200 feet in the mountains. Bounded by steep and rugged escarpments to the north and south, the Valley has the most spectacular scenery in southern California. Numerous tributaries, which emerge from the deeply incised, and narrow canyons in the San Bernardino Mountains, and the San Jacinto Mountains descend onto the valley floor of San Gorgonio Pass and flow eastward toward the Coachella Valley. The largest of these is the San Gorgonio River, which flows through Banning Canyon with the largest drainage basin area, collecting overland flows from several large canyons along its lower reaches before exiting the City near Interstate (I-10). Tributaries of the San Gorgonio River, such as Smith Creek (the largest tributary within the City), Gilman, Big Oaks, Mias, Hathaway, Potrero, drain the western part of the City, while Montgomery Creek, together with other smaller unnamed creeks, drains the central part. These channels coalesce along the southern edge of the City, and surface water is conveyed toward the Coachella Valley.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • County of Riverside General Plan San Jacinto Valley Area Plan
    County of Riverside General Plan San Jacinto Valley Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 Page i County of Riverside General Plan San Jacinto Valley Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 San Jacinto River ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 2000
    SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT ACT OF 2000 Public Law 106-351 106th Congress An Act To establish the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in the State of California. <<NOTE: Oct. 24, 2000 - [H.R. 3676]>> Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 2000. 16 USC 431 note.>> SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 2000''. (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Establishment of Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, California. Sec. 3. Management of Federal lands in the National Monument. Sec. 4. Development of management plan. Sec. 5. Existing and historical uses of Federal lands included in Monument. Sec. 6. Acquisition of land. Sec. 7. Local advisory committee. Sec. 8. Authorization of appropriations. SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT, CALIFORNIA. (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following: (1) The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains in southern California contain nationally significant biological, cultural, recreational, geological, educational, and scientific values. (2) The magnificent vistas, wildlife, land forms, and natural and cultural resources of these mountains occupy a unique and challenging position given their proximity to highly urbanized areas of the Coachella Valley. (3) These mountains, which rise abruptly from the desert floor to an elevation of 10,802 feet, provide a picturesque backdrop for Coachella Valley communities and support an abundance of recreational opportunities that are an important regional economic resource.
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino County, California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPAN~ MAP MF-1493-A UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY IIINE1lAL RESOURCE POTBM"nAL OP THE BIGHORN MOUNTAINS WU.DERNJmS STUDY AREA (CDCA-217), SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY REPORT By Miathan C. Matti, Brett P. Cox, Ecblrdo A. Rodriguez, CUrtis M. Obi, Robert E. Powell, Margaret E. Hinkle, and Andrew Griscom U.S. Geological Survey and Charles Sabine and Gary J. Cwick U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WU.DERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys in certain areas to determine their mineral resource potential. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a mineral survey of the Bighorn Mountains Wilderness Study Area (CDCA-217), California Desert Conservation Area, San Bernardino County, California. SUMMARY Geological, geochemical, and geophysical evidence, together with a review of historical mining and prospecting activities, suggests that most of the Bighorn Mountains Wilderness Study Area has low potential for the discovery of all types of mineral and energy resources-including precious and base metals, building stone and aggregate, fossil fuels, radioactive-mineral resources, . and geothermal resources. Low-grade mineralization has been documented in one small area near Rattlesnake Canyon, and this area has low to moderate potential for future small-scale exploration and development of precious and base metals. Thorium and uranium enrichment have been documented in two small areas in the eastern part of the wilderness study area; these two areas have low to moderate potential for future small-scale exploration and development of radioactive-mineral resources.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 © Copyright by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains by Katherine Colby Glover Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Glen Michael MacDonald, Chair Long sediment records from offshore and terrestrial basins in California show a history of vegetation and climatic change since the last interglacial (130,000 years BP). Vegetation sensitive to temperature and hydroclimatic change tended to be basin-specific, though the expansion of shrubs and herbs universally signalled arid conditions, and landscpe conversion to steppe. Multi-proxy analyses were conducted on two cores from the Big Bear Valley in the San Bernardino Mountains to reconstruct a 125,000-year history for alpine southern California, at the transition between mediterranean alpine forest and Mojave desert. Age control was based upon radiocarbon and luminescence dating. Loss-on-ignition, magnetic susceptibility, grain size, x-ray fluorescence, pollen, biogenic silica, and charcoal analyses showed that the paleoclimate of the San Bernardino Mountains was highly subject to globally pervasive forcing mechanisms that register in northern hemispheric oceans. Primary productivity in Baldwin Lake during most of its ii history showed a strong correlation to historic fluctuations in local summer solar radiation values.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Settlement to 1969
    29 Context: Native American Settlement to 1969 Francisco Patencio outside the roundhouse, c. 1940. Source: Palm Springs Historical Society. FINAL DRAFT – FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL City of Palm Springs Citywide Historic Context Statement & Survey Findings HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP 30 CONTEXT: NATIVE AMERICAN SETTLEMENT TO 196923 The earliest inhabitants of the Coachella Valley are the Native people known ethnohistorically as the Cahuilla Indians. The Cahuilla territory includes the areas from the San Jacinto Mountains, the San Gorgonia Pass, and the desert regions reaching east to the Colorado River. The Cahuilla language is part of the Takic branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family and all the Cahuilla groups speak a mutually intelligible despite different dialects. The Cahuilla group that inhabited the Palm Springs area are known as the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. The Cahuilla name for the area that is now Palm Springs is Sec-he, “boiling water,” named for the hot springs located in what is currently the center of the Palm Springs business district. The springs have always provided clean water, bathing, and a connection to the spiritual world, and were used for ceremonial and healing purposes.24 The Cahuilla people refer to themselves as ‘ivi’lyu’atum and are ethnographically divided into two patrilineal moieties: the Wildcats and the Coyotes. Each moiety was further divided into clans which are made up of lineages. Lineages had their own territory and hunting rights within a larger clan territory. There are a number of lineages in the Palm Springs area, which each have religious and political autonomy. Prior to European contact, Cahuilla communities established summer settlements in the palm-lined mountain canyons around the Coachella valley; oral histories and archaeological evidence indicates that they settled in the Tahquitz Canyon at least 5,000 years ago.25 The Cahuilla moved each winter to thatched shelters clustered around the natural mineral hot springs on the valley floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
    Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES City of Banning General Plan WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT PURPOSE The Water Resources Element addresses water quality, availability and conservation for the City’s current and future needs. The Element also discusses the importance of on-going coordination and cooperation between the City, Banning Heights Mutual Water Company, High Valley Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency and other agencies responsible for supplying water to the region. Topics include the ground water replenishment program, consumptive demand of City residents, and wastewater management and its increasingly important role in the protection of ground water resources. The goals, policies and programs set forth in this element direct staff and other City officials in the management of this essential resource. BACKGROUND The Water Resources Element is directly related to the Land Use Element, in considering the availability of water resources to meet the land use plan; and has a direct relationship to the Flooding and Hydrology Element, in its effort to protect and enhance groundwater recharge. Water issues are also integral components of the following elements: Police and Fire Protection, Economic Development, Emergency Preparedness, and Water, Wastewater and Utilities. The Water Resources Element addresses topics set forth in California Government Code Section 65302(d). Also, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 21083.2(g), the City is empowered to require that adequate research and documentation be conducted when the potential for significant impacts to water and other important resources exists. Watersheds The westernmost part of the planning area is located at the summit of the San Gorgonio Pass, which divides two major watersheds: the San Jacinto River Watershed to the west and the Salton Sea watershed to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • III. General Description of Environmental Setting Acres, Or Approximately 19 Percent of the City’S Area
    III. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING A. Overview of Environmental Setting Section 15130 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires an EIR to include a discussion of the cumulative impacts of a proposed project when the incremental effects of a project are cumulatively considerable. Cumulative impacts are defined as impacts that result from the combination of the proposed project evaluated in the EIR combined with other projects causing related impacts. Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Section 15125 (c) of the State CEQA Guidelines requires an EIR to include a discussion on the regional setting that the project site is located within. Detailed environmental setting descriptions are contained in each respective section, as presented in Chapter IV of this Draft EIR. B. Project Location The City of Ontario (City) is in the southwestern corner of San Bernardino County and is surrounded by the Cities of Chino and Montclair, and unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County to the west; the Cities of Upland and Rancho Cucamonga to the north; the City of Fontana and unincorporated land in San Bernardino County to the east; the Cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley to the east and south. The City is in the central part of the Upper Santa Ana River Valley. This portion of the valley is bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the north; the Chino Hills, Puente Hills, and San Jose Hills to the west; the Santa Ana River to the south; and Lytle Creek Wash on the east.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.9 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES the Information Contained Within This
    5.9 Biological Resources 5.9 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The information contained within this section is summarized from the Moreno Valley General Plan EIR Biological Report (Merkel & Associates, September 2004). The report is provided in Volume II Appendix E of this EIR. The existing biological resources documented in this report were determined through an extensive review of the most current, available biological literature and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) data available for the planning area. Previous biological surveys conducted by Merkel & Associates (M&A) staff, as well as biological information gathered by other consultants for projects within Moreno Valley, were further reviewed. Vegetation communities were primarily identified based on the regional GIS data incorporated into the MSHCP (KTU+A and PSBS 1995). Floral and faunal species potential presence was determined based on vegetation community presence/absence and knowledge of species requirements. The assessment of presence or potential presence of sensitive biological resources was also based on MSHCP data, which incorporated California Natural Diversity Database records for sensitive species. In addition to the MSHCP and vegetation community information, the following sources were consulted to aid in determining faunal presence/absence: USFWS 2000b, Ericksen and Belk 1999, Sauer et al. 1996, Sauer et al. 2000, Zeiner et al. 1988, Zeiner et al. 1990a and 1990b. M&A also contacted individuals with special expertise to determine the likelihood of species presence for certain groups (e.g., bats). Additionally, M&A biologists, Craig Reiser and Diana Jensen, conducted field investigations in April 2001 to ground truth portions of the regional GIS vegetation data and record locations of identified sensitive species.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Report
    HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT MCDONALD LEARNING CENTER EAST PROJECT Big Bear City Area San Bernardino County, California For Submittal to: County of San Bernardino 385 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415 Prepared for: McDonald Learning Center P.O. Box 150 Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 Prepared by: CRM TECH 1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 Bai “Tom” Tang, Principal Investigator Michael Hogan, Principal Investigator April 23, 2019 CRM TECH Contract No. 3458 Title: Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: McDonald Learning Center East Project, Big Bear City Area, San Bernardino County, California Author(s): Bai “Tom” Tang, Principal Investigator/Historian Ben Kerridge, Archaeologist/Report Writer Daniel Ballester, Archaeologist/Field Director Nina Gallardo, Archaeologist/Native American Liaison Consulting Firm: CRM TECH 1016 East Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 (909) 824-6400 Date: April 23, 2019 For Submittal to: County of San Bernardino 385 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415 (909) 387-8311 Prepared for: Lisa Burtner McDonald Learning Center P.O. Box 150 Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 (909) 709-4041 USGS Quadrangle: Moonridge, Calif., 7.5’ quadrangle (Section 19, T2N R2E, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian) Project Size: Approximately 0.75 acre Keywords: Big Bear Valley, San Bernardino Mountains; Phase I historical/ archaeological resources survey; a portion of Assessor’s Parcel Number 0315-421-02; no “historical resources” found MANAGEMENT SUMMARY In March and April 2019, CRM TECH performed a cultural resources study on approximately 0.75 acre of undeveloped land in the San Bernardino Mountains and to the southeast of the unincorporated community of Big Bear City, San Bernardino County, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan
    2020COACHELLA VALLEY REGIONAL URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT | MAY 25, 2021 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan Prepared For: Coachella Valley Water District Coachella Water Authority Desert Water Agency Indio Water Authority Mission Springs Water District Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company 6/30/2021 Prepared by Water Systems Consulting, Inc. 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 RUWMP Organization ...................................................................................................................... 1-2 Plain Language Summary ................................................................................................................ 1-3 Chapter 2 Agency Descriptions .............................................................................................................. 2-1 Agencies Participating in RUWMP ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Coachella Valley Water District ................................................................................................. 2-3 2.1.2 Coachella Water Authority ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA JAIL PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION May 16-18, 2018 CJPA Quarterly Conference Hosted by Riverside County
    CALIFORNIA JAIL PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION May 16-18, 2018 CJPA Quarterly Conference Hosted by Riverside County Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:00 – 12:00 CJPA Board Meeting – Open to all members Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility Sheriff’s Inmate Training and Education Bureau (SITE-B) Conference Room 1627 S. Hargrave Street, Banning, CA 92220 12:00 – 1:00 Lunch – provided by 1:00 – 3:00 Optional Tour of SITE-B Campus 1627 S. Hargrave Street, Banning, CA 92220 5:30 PM No host dinner at Chili’s Restaurant 1490 E. 2nd Street, Beaumont, CA 92223 Thursday, May 17, 2018 8:00 – 8:30 Continental Breakfast – provided by Highland Springs Resort Highland Springs Resort, Conference Room 10600 Highland Springs Ave., Cherry Valley, CA 92223 8:30 – 9:00 Welcome by Riverside County Sheriff Executive Staff Assistant Sheriff Jerry Gutierrez 9:00 – 9:45 Keynote Speaker—Dr. Mark Emerson ReEntry: Life Changing Programs Mark Emerson, PhD, RSAT Program Graduate RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT 4095 Lemon Street • Riverside, California 92501 9: 45 – 10:00 Break 10:00 - 11:30 ReEntry Workshop Working with the Work Resistant Client and Ex-Offender Larry Robbin, Executive Director Robbin and Associates 11:30 – 12:00 Networking Lunch – provided by Highland Springs Resort 12:00 – 1:00 Job Retention Larry Robbin, Executive Director Robbin and Associates 1:00 – 1:15 Break 1:15 – 2:30 Program Design Larry Robbin, Executive Director Robbin and Associates 2:30 – 2:45 Break 2:45 – 4:00 Pass Job Connection: Reentry Resources and Services Mary Hamlin, Director 5:30 Dinner hosted by TBD at Victor’s Restaurant and Bar 1620 E.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Environmental Analysis
    5. Environmental Analysis 5. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 5.1 AESTHETICS Characterizing aesthetics and aesthetic impacts is highly subjective by nature. Aesthetics, as evaluated in this Section of the EIR, involves establishing the existing visual character including visual resources and scenic vistas unique to the City of San Bernardino, the SOI and the Arrowhead Springs area. Visual resources are determined by identifying existing landforms, natural features or urban characteristics; views of sensitive receptors (i.e., residential, schools, recreation areas, etc.); and existing light and glare (i.e., nighttime illumination). The aesthetic impacts of the proposed project are evaluated by determining the aesthetic compatibility of the proposed project with the surrounding area taking into consideration the visual qualities as well as the sensitivity of receptors to these features. 5.1.1 Environmental Setting 5.1.1.1 San Bernardino General Plan Update Visual Character The City of San Bernardino lies on a broad, gently sloping lowland that flanks the southwest margin of the San Bernardino Mountains. The lowland is underlain by alluvial sediments eroded from bedrock in the adjacent mountains and washed by rivers and creeks into the valley region where they have accumulated in layers of gravel, sand, silt and clay. This low lying valley is framed by the San Bernardino Mountains on the northeast and east, Blue Mountains and Box Springs Mountain abutting the Cities of Loma Linda and Redlands to the south, and the San Gabriel Mountains and the Jurupa Hills to the northwest and southwest, respectively. The Santa Ana River has a number of tributaries in the vicinity of San Bernardino that contribute flow to the main stem of the river including Lytle Creek, Cajon Creek, Warm Creek, East Creek and West Twin Creek (see Figure 3.1-2).
    [Show full text]