DOCSLIB.ORG

Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management Plan 2020COACHELLA VALLEY REGIONAL URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT | MAY 25, 2021 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan Prepared For: Coachella Valley Water District Coachella Water Authority Desert Water Agency Indio Water Authority Mission Springs Water District Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company 6/30/2021 Prepared by Water Systems Consulting, Inc. 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 RUWMP Organization ...................................................................................................................... 1-2 Plain Language Summary ................................................................................................................ 1-3 Chapter 2 Agency Descriptions .............................................................................................................. 2-1 Agencies Participating in RUWMP ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Coachella Valley Water District ................................................................................................. 2-3 2.1.2 Coachella Water Authority ......................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.3 Desert Water Agency ................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.1.4 Indio Water Authority ................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.1.5 Mission Springs Water District ................................................................................................... 2-4 2.1.6 Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company ..................................................................................... 2-4 Other Agencies and Entities ............................................................................................................. 2-4 2.2.1 Valley Sanitary District ............................................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.2 Agua Caliente Water Authority .................................................................................................. 2-4 2.2.3 City of Palm Springs .................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.4 Coachella Valley Regional Water Management Group ............................................................. 2-5 2.2.5 Indio Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agencies ............................................................... 2-5 2.2.6 Mission Creek Subbasin Management Committee ................................................................... 2-6 Outreach During RUWMP Preparation ............................................................................................ 2-6 Chapter 3 Regional Sources of Supply .................................................................................................. 3-1 Groundwater ..................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Basin Description ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Groundwater Management ........................................................................................................ 3-6 3.1.3 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act .............................................................................. 3-7 3.1.4 Groundwater Quality .................................................................................................................. 3-7 Imported Water ................................................................................................................................. 3-8 3.2.1 Colorado River Water ................................................................................................................ 3-8 3.2.2 State Water Project Water/MWD Exchange ............................................................................ 3-13 Local Surface Water ....................................................................................................................... 3-16 Recycled Water .............................................................................................................................. 3-17 Consistency with the Delta Plan for Participants in Covered Actions ............................................ 3-20 Climate Change .............................................................................................................................. 3-20 Chapter 4 Coachella Valley Water District ............................................................................................. 4-1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Chapter Organization ................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.2 RUWMP in Relation to Other Efforts ......................................................................................... 4-1 i 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan 4.1.3 RUWMP and Grant or Loan Eligibility ....................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.4 Demonstration of Consistency with the Delta Plan for Participants in Covered Actions ........... 4-2 Plan Preparation ............................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.1 Plan Preparation ........................................................................................................................ 4-2 4.2.2 Basis for Preparing a Plan ......................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.3 Regional Planning ...................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.4 Individual or Regional Planning and Compliance ...................................................................... 4-3 4.2.5 Fiscal or Calendar Year and Units of Measure .......................................................................... 4-3 4.2.6 Coordination and Outreach ........................................................................................................ 4-3 System Description ........................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.3.1 General Description ................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.3.2 Jurisdictional Boundary .............................................................................................................. 4-5 4.3.3 Service Area Climate ................................................................................................................. 4-7 4.3.4 Service Area Population and Demographics ............................................................................. 4-8 4.3.5 Land Uses within Service Area .................................................................................................. 4-9 Water Use Characterization ............................................................................................................. 4-9 4.4.1 Past, Current, and Projected Water Use by Sector ................................................................. 4-10 4.4.2 Worksheets and Reporting Tables .......................................................................................... 4-15 4.4.3 Water Use for Lower Income Households ............................................................................... 4-15 4.4.4 Climate Change Considerations .............................................................................................. 4-17 SB X7-7 Baseline and Targets ....................................................................................................... 4-17 4.5.1 Wholesale Suppliers ................................................................................................................ 4-17 4.5.2 SB X7-7 Forms and Tables ..................................................................................................... 4-17 4.5.3 Baseline and Target Calculations for 2020 UWMPs ............................................................... 4-17 4.5.4 Service Area Population and Gross Water Use ...................................................................... 4-17 4.5.5 2020 Compliance Daily Per-Capita Water Use (GPCD).......................................................... 4-18 4.5.6 Regional Alliance ..................................................................................................................... 4-19 Water Supply Characterization ....................................................................................................... 4-19 4.6.1 Water Supply Analysis Overview ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kern Community Radio
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Section 73.3556 of the ) MB Docket No. 19-310 Commission’s Rules Regarding Duplication of ) Programming on Commonly Owned Radio Stations ) ) Modernization of Media Regulation ) MB Docket No. 17-105 Initiative ) Reply Comments of Kern Community Radio This reply comment is from nonprofit Kern Community Radio (“Kern”). Kern is a prospective non-commercial community broadcaster in Bakersfield, California. Kern is supplying this comment to shed light on the reality of how duplicated- and rebroadcast- programming is an epidemic. Redundant and relayed programming is hollowing-out local radio, vastly reducing programming diversity, and frustrating diverse new broadcast entrants. This reply is being filed as a response to National Association of Broadcasters’ (“NAB”) comment stating that diversity has increased on the dail, advocating the lift of the duplication rule. Kern provides proof in this reply that the program duplication rules need to be expanded to ensure local programming diversity and allow for new entrants. About Kern Community Radio Members of Kern Community Radio had desired to pursue a non-commercial, educational community radio station for Bakersfield in 2006 due to the total absence of any local local secular non-commercial radio. Bakersfield, a metropolitan area of roughly 840,000 people, does not have one local-studio secular, non-commercial radio station. That includes no secular LPFM, no local-content NPR station,1 no community station, or no college station. The entire non-commercial FM band except for one station is all relayed via satellite from chiefly religious broadcasters from Texas, Idaho, and Northern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report Forest Service Grant / Agrreement No
    PROGRESS REPORT FOREST SERVICE GRANT / AGRREEMENT NO. 13-DG-11132540-413 Period covered by this report: 04/01/2014—05/31/2015 Issued to: Center of Southwest Culture, Inc. Address: 505 Marquette Avenue, NW, Suite 1610 Project Name: Arboles Comunitarios Contact Person/Principal Investigator Name: Arturo Sandoval Phone Number: 505.247.2729 Fax Number: 505.243-1257 E-Mail Address: [email protected] Web Site Address (if applicable): www.arbolescomunitarios.com Date of Award: 03/27/2013 Grant Modifications: Date of Expiration: 05/31/2015 Funding: Federal Share: $95,000 plus Grantee Share: $300,000 = Total Project: $395,000 Budget Sheet: FS Grant Manager: Nancy Stremple / Address: 1400 Independence Ave SW, Yates building (3 Central) Washington, DC 20250-1151 Phone Number: 202/309-9873 Albuquerque Service Center (ASC) Send a copy to: Albuquerque Service Center Payments – Grants & Agreements 101B Sun Ave NE Albuquerque, NM 87109 EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: 877-687-4894 Project abstract (as defined by initial proposal and contract): Arboles Comunitarios is proposed under Innovation Grant Category 1 as a national Spanish language education program. By utilizing the expertise of the Center of Southwest Culture community and urban forestry partners along with the targeted outreach capacity of Hispanic Communications Network, this project will communicate the connection between the personal benefits of urban forest and quality of life in a manner that resonates specifically with the Hispanic community. Project objectives: • Bilingual website with
    [Show full text]
  • Bakersfield, CA (Cant.)
    THE EXLINECOMPANY MEDIA BROKERS - CONSI!LT.ANTS p February 9,7004 Alfrcdo Plascenaa President I~.azerBroadcasting Corporation 200 South A Street, Suite 400 Oxnard, CA 93030-5717 Dear MI-. Plascencia, Herewith. in narrative forrri, is the review and appnisal of all of the assets, whicli are used and usable in the operatlons of five Radio Slations KAhX-FM, AveIial, KAJP-FM, Firebaugh, KZPE-FM, Ford City, KZPO-FM, Lindsay, and KNCS-FM. Coalinga, all California. I have not personally vislted the subject propernes, have no past 11oI coiiternplale furure interest in them and I have made the necessary investigation and analyses to develop this review and appralsal, subjcct only to the limitations heremafter described. The value determined rhrough this process is that of July 2003. ST-ATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND VALUE The purpose of this appraisal is to estiiiiattr the fair markel value of the aforementioned assets. The assets consisr of leases md personal property wi'th attendant licenses and pcrmits, which provide for the daily operation of the sublect ststioiir serving !he central San Joaquin Valley area of Californian horn FirebaLld7~ iii the north to Ford City in the south (Map enclosed.) This appraisal has been prepared at the specific direction of Mr. Alfred0 Plasceniia. President, Lazer Broadcasting Corporation. Marliet value is defined as the ‘‘hghesf price estimated in terms ofmoiley which a proprny will bring if exposed for sale tn the open market, allowing a reasonable ninc to t-md ;1 purchaser who buys with howledge of all of the uses to which it IS adapted arid for which it is capable of being used.’’ IDENTIFICATION OF FACLLLITIES Ktt9X-FM is a local class A station with 6 ku.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
    Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES City of Banning General Plan WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT PURPOSE The Water Resources Element addresses water quality, availability and conservation for the City’s current and future needs. The Element also discusses the importance of on-going coordination and cooperation between the City, Banning Heights Mutual Water Company, High Valley Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency and other agencies responsible for supplying water to the region. Topics include the ground water replenishment program, consumptive demand of City residents, and wastewater management and its increasingly important role in the protection of ground water resources. The goals, policies and programs set forth in this element direct staff and other City officials in the management of this essential resource. BACKGROUND The Water Resources Element is directly related to the Land Use Element, in considering the availability of water resources to meet the land use plan; and has a direct relationship to the Flooding and Hydrology Element, in its effort to protect and enhance groundwater recharge. Water issues are also integral components of the following elements: Police and Fire Protection, Economic Development, Emergency Preparedness, and Water, Wastewater and Utilities. The Water Resources Element addresses topics set forth in California Government Code Section 65302(d). Also, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 21083.2(g), the City is empowered to require that adequate research and documentation be conducted when the potential for significant impacts to water and other important resources exists. Watersheds The westernmost part of the planning area is located at the summit of the San Gorgonio Pass, which divides two major watersheds: the San Jacinto River Watershed to the west and the Salton Sea watershed to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • The M Street Journal Radio's Journal of Record ' EW YORK NASHVILLE CAPSTAR ACROSS AFRICA
    The M Street Journal Radio's Journal of Record ' EW YORK NASHVILLE CAPSTAR ACROSS AFRICA. Capstar Broadcasting Partners will spend $60 million for twenty stations in four separate transactions covering five markets. Terms of the individual deals weren't disclosed. Two of the deals involve Point Communications, which is the managing partner of six stations in Madison, WI and owns five in the Roanoke - Lynchburg area, owned through a subsidiary. In Madison, the stations are standards WTSO; CHR WZEE; news -talk WIBA; rock WIBA -FM; new rock WMAD -FM, Sun Prairie, WI; and soft AC WMLI, Sauk City, WI. In Roanoke - Lynchburg -- oldies simulcast WLDJ, Appomattox and WRDJ, Roanoke; urban oldies WJJS, Lynchburg; and dance combo WJJS -FM, Vinton, and WJJX, Lynchburg. The third deal gives Capstar three stations in the Yuma, AZ market, including oldies KBLU, country KTTI, and classic rocker KYJT, from Commonwealth Broadcasting of Arizona, LLC. Finally, COMCO Broadcasting's Alaska properties, which include children's KYAK, CHR KGOT, and AC KYMG, all Anchorage; and news -talk KIAK, country KIAK -FM, and AC KAKQ -FM, all Fairbanks. WE DON'T NEED NO STINKIN' LICENSE . It's spent almost ten weeks on the air without a license, but the new religious -programmed station on 105.3 MHz in the Hartford, CT area, is being investigated by the Commission's New England Field Office. According to the Hartford Courant, Mark Blake is operating the station from studios in Bloomfield, CT, and says that he "stands behind" the station's operation. Although there have been no interference complaints filed, other stations in the area are claiming they are losing advertising dollars to the pirate.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN GORGONIO HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEM HAER CA-2278 San Bernardino National Forest HAER CA-2278 Banning Vicinity Riverside County California
    SAN GORGONIO HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEM HAER CA-2278 San Bernardino National Forest HAER CA-2278 Banning vicinity Riverside County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SAN GORGONIO HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEM HAERNo. CA-2278 Location: The San Gorgonio Hydroelectric System is located in San Bernardino National Forest along the San Gorgonio River in Riverside and San Bernardino counties just north of California State Route 60. The hydroelectric system is located in Sections 1, 2, and 3; T.2S., R.1E. on the Forest Falls USGS topographic map and Sections 19, 29, 30, 31; T.1S., R.2E. on the San Gorgonio Mountains USGS topographic map. The southern boundary of the system is about seven miles north of the city of Banning. The northern most feature of the system is the East Fork Dam located at latitude: 34.03080, longitude: -116.857171. The coordinate represents the center of the East Fork Dam structure. The southern most feature of the system is Powerhouse No.2 located at latitude: 34.018537, longitude: -116.894919. The coordinate represents the center of the Powerhouse No.2. building. Both coordinates were obtained on June 30, 2010 using a GPS mapping grade unit accurate to +/-3 meters after differential correction. The San Gorgonio Hydroelectric System's location has no restriction on its release to the public. Date of Construction: San Gorgonio Powerhouse No.l: 1923; Powerhouse No.2: 1923 Builder: San Gorgonio Power Company Present Owner: Southern California Edison Company (fee ownership and easements) 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead,CA 91770 Present Use: Vacant Significance: The San Gorgonio Hydroelectric System was found to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A and C in 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2016 Proclamation 9396—Establishment of the Sand to Snow National Monument February 12, 2016
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2016 Proclamation 9396—Establishment of the Sand to Snow National Monument February 12, 2016 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation The Sand to Snow area of southern California is an ecological and cultural treasure, a microcosm of the great geographic diversity of the region. Rising from the floor of the Sonoran Desert to the tallest peak in southern California, the area features a remarkable diversity of plant and animal species. The area includes a portion of the San Bernardino National Forest and connects this area with Joshua Tree National Park to the east, knitting together a mosaic of spectacular landscapes stretching over 200 miles. The mountain peaks of the Sand to Snow area frame the northeastern reach of Coachella Valley along with the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument to the south. Home to desert oases at Big Morongo Canyon and Whitewater Canyon, the area serves as a refuge for desert dwelling animals and a stopover for migrating birds. The archaeological riches of the Black Lava Buttes and the historical remains of mining and ranching communities tell of past prosperity and struggle in this arid land. The unbroken expanse is an invaluable treasure for our Nation and will continue to serve as an irreplaceable resource for archaeologists, geologists, and biologists for generations to come. The Sand to Snow area encompasses a rich diversity of geological and ecological resources, including a nearly 10,000-foot elevation gradient from the Sonoran Desert floor to the top of the 11,500-foot San Gorgonio Mountain, the highest mountain in southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources
    Section 4.14 Mineral Resources 4.14.1 Introduction Minerals are defined as any naturally occurring chemical elements or compounds formed from inorganic pro- cesses and organic substances. Minable minerals or “ore deposits” are defined as a concentration of ore or minerals having a value materially in excess of the cost of developing, mining and processing the mineral and re- claiming the area. Regulating this resource, the County of Riverside implements the State of California’s Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) at the local level. This section assesses potential impacts associated with mineral resources that could occur as a result of future development accommodated by the proposed project, GPA No. 960. 4.14.2 Existing Environmental Setting - Mineral Resources Mineral resources are an integral part of the development and economic well-being of the County of Riverside. The conservation, extraction and processing of mineral resources is essential to meeting the needs of Riverside County and supporting the continued growth of the region. Mineral resources serve various public, commercial, scientific and recreational purposes benefiting both the private and public sectors. In Riverside County, minerals are a foremost natural resource, important not only to the economic health of Riverside County, but to the many industries outside the county that depend on them as well. The non-renewable characteristic of mineral deposits necessitates careful and efficient management to prevent waste, careless exploitation and uncontrolled urbanization. Most of the economically valuable mineral deposits known to occur in Riverside County are located along Interstates 15, 215 and 10. A. Economically Important Minerals in Riverside County Riverside County has a rich history of over 175 years of mining, starting with the California Gold Rush.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting
    TN/City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting CITY OF BANNING COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SECTION II. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Introduction This section of the EIR provides a general introduction to the environmental setting of the Banning Pass area, of which the City of Banning is at the center. Discussions are based on a regional perspective to provide a broad and comprehensive understanding of the issues associated with implementation of the proposed General Plan. Topics discussed include existing and surrounding land use patterns in Banning and the vicinity, regional climate, topography, soils and geology, and biological resources. Also addressed are air quality issues, cultural resources, traffic and circulation, visual resources, and public services and facilities. The City of Banning conducted an Initial Study in accordance with Section 15063, 15064, and 15065 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (see Appendix A). Issues identified as potentially significant in the Initial Study are analyzed in detail in Section III of this document. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) for this EIR was transmitted on January 7, 2005 and comments received are included in Appendix A of this document. The General Plan study area encompasses a total of approximately 23.2± square miles of incorporated City lands, including about 8.5± square miles of Sphere-of-Influence lands, and about 5.2± square miles outside the SOI and the City but within the General Plan study area. A. Existing Land Use Development in the City of Banning is focused primarily on the valley floor along U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineer's Report on Water Supply and Replenishment Assessment
    Coachella Valley Water District Engineer’s Report on Water Supply and Replenishment Assessment 2016-2017 • Mission Creek Subbasin Area of Benefit • West Whitewater River Subbasin Area of Benefit • East Whitewater River Subbasin Area of Benefit Prepared By: & April 2016 eN Q)N >. >0) ..0 "_N "'0 O-..:r Q) \' (f) 0 co"- a. LL Z ~ "'OW a.. ~ "~~ o~ 0 0:: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS John Powell ...................................................................................................................President Peter Nelson ..........................................................................................................Vice President Ed Pack ........................................................................................................................... Director G. Patrick O'Dowd............................................................................................................ Director Cástulo Estrada ............................................................................................................... Director OFFICERS & COUNSEL Jim Barrett ........................................................................................................ General Manager Robert Cheng .................................................................................... Assistant General Manager Jeffry F. Ferre ................................................................................................Best Best & Krieger ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Steve Bigley..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 530 CIAO BRAMPTON on ETHNIC AM 530 N43 35 20 W079 52 54 09-Feb
    frequency callsign city format identification slogan latitude longitude last change in listing kHz d m s d m s (yy-mmm) 530 CIAO BRAMPTON ON ETHNIC AM 530 N43 35 20 W079 52 54 09-Feb 540 CBKO COAL HARBOUR BC VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N50 36 4 W127 34 23 09-May 540 CBXQ # UCLUELET BC VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N48 56 44 W125 33 7 16-Oct 540 CBYW WELLS BC VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N53 6 25 W121 32 46 09-May 540 CBT GRAND FALLS NL VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N48 57 3 W055 37 34 00-Jul 540 CBMM # SENNETERRE QC VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N48 22 42 W077 13 28 18-Feb 540 CBK REGINA SK VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N51 40 48 W105 26 49 00-Jul 540 WASG DAPHNE AL BLK GSPL/RELIGION N30 44 44 W088 5 40 17-Sep 540 KRXA CARMEL VALLEY CA SPANISH RELIGION EL SEMBRADOR RADIO N36 39 36 W121 32 29 14-Aug 540 KVIP REDDING CA RELIGION SRN VERY INSPIRING N40 37 25 W122 16 49 09-Dec 540 WFLF PINE HILLS FL TALK FOX NEWSRADIO 93.1 N28 22 52 W081 47 31 18-Oct 540 WDAK COLUMBUS GA NEWS/TALK FOX NEWSRADIO 540 N32 25 58 W084 57 2 13-Dec 540 KWMT FORT DODGE IA C&W FOX TRUE COUNTRY N42 29 45 W094 12 27 13-Dec 540 KMLB MONROE LA NEWS/TALK/SPORTS ABC NEWSTALK 105.7&540 N32 32 36 W092 10 45 19-Jan 540 WGOP POCOMOKE CITY MD EZL/OLDIES N38 3 11 W075 34 11 18-Oct 540 WXYG SAUK RAPIDS MN CLASSIC ROCK THE GOAT N45 36 18 W094 8 21 17-May 540 KNMX LAS VEGAS NM SPANISH VARIETY NBC K NEW MEXICO N35 34 25 W105 10 17 13-Nov 540 WBWD ISLIP NY SOUTH ASIAN BOLLY 540 N40 45 4 W073 12 52 18-Dec 540 WRGC SYLVA NC VARIETY NBC THE RIVER N35 23 35 W083 11 38 18-Jun 540 WETC # WENDELL-ZEBULON NC RELIGION EWTN DEVINE MERCY R.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter V. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
    Chapter V. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS City of Banning General Plan GEOTECHNICAL ELEMENT PURPOSE The Geotechnical Element intends to provide information regarding the geological and seismic conditions and hazards affecting the City of Banning, its Sphere-of-Influence (SOI), and the expanded General Plan planning area. A series of goals, policies, and programs are set forth in the Geotechnical Element focused at providing protection for the general health and welfare of the community and reducing potential impacts, such as loss of life and property damage, associated with seismic and geologic hazards. The Element, including maps and other supporting document will serve as a source of foundational information concerning regional geotechnical hazards, which are significantly essential to establishing future land use policies and decisions. BACKGROUND The physical characteristics of the planning area and the safety of the community are examined in the Geotechnical Element. The Element itself is closely related to a number of other elements of a General Plan, such as Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Economic/Fiscal, Public Buildings and Facilities, Emergency Preparedness, Water, Sewer and Utilities. It is also directly related with the many issues addressed in the Flooding/Hydrology and Police and Fire Protection Elements. Under the California Government Code and Public Resources Code, a General Plan must include an element that addresses seismic safety issues. In compliance to Government Code Section 65302(g), the General Plan must address the need to protect the community from unreasonable risks that could result from seismically induced hazards, such as surface rupture, groundshaking, ground failure, seiching, dam failure, subsidence, and other known harmful geologic risks.
    [Show full text]