DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix F: Hazards and Hazardous Materials Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix F: Hazards and Hazardous Materials Analysis San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency Beaumont Avenue Recharge Facility and Pipeline Draft EIR Appendix F: Hazards and Hazardous Materials Analysis FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\3178\31780004\EIR\2 - DEIR\31780004 Sec99-00 Appendix Dividers.doc San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency Beaumont Avenue Recharge Facility and Pipeline Draft EIR F.1 - Recharge Basin FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\3178\31780004\EIR\2 - DEIR\31780004 Sec99-00 Appendix Dividers.doc PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, APPROXIMATE 52 ACRE SITE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 404-010-012 AND 404-010-015, BEAUMONT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: SAN GORGONIO PASS WATER AGENCY 1210 BEAUMONT AVENUE BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA 92223 Project No. 603154-001 May 4, 2011 May 4, 2011 Project No. 603154-001 To: San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency 120 Beaumont Avenue Beaumont, California 92223 Attention: Mr. Jeff Davis, General Manager Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Approximate 52 Acre Site, Assessor Parcel Numbers 404-010-012 and 404-010-015, Beaumont, Riverside County, California Leighton Consulting, Inc. (Leighton Consulting) is pleased to present this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report for the subject property. Leighton Consulting declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. Leighton Consulting personnel have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. Leighton Consulting has developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. If you have questions regarding this report, please contact us. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. Kristin Stout, REA I Senior Project Scientist KAS/dlm Distribution: (3) Addressee plus (1) electronic copy 10532 Acacia Street, Suite B-6 ■ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 484-2205 ■ Fax (909) 484-2170 ■ www.leightongroup.com 603154-001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Authorization ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope of Work .............................................................................................. 1 1.4 Significant Assumptions................................................................................. 2 1.5 Limitations and Exceptions ............................................................................ 2 1.6 Special Terms and Conditions ........................................................................ 3 1.7 User Reliance ............................................................................................... 3 1.8 Important Information About Geoenvironmental Reports ................................. 3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Location and Legal Description ...................................................................... 4 2.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics ......................................................... 4 2.3 Current Use of the Subject Property ............................................................... 4 2.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads and Other Improvements on the Site ............ 4 2.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties .............................................................. 5 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION .............................................................................. 6 3.1 Title Records ................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ......................................... 6 3.3 Specialized Knowledge .................................................................................. 6 3.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information ............................. 6 3.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ................................................. 6 3.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information ..................................... 6 3.7 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA ................................................................ 7 3.8 Other........................................................................................................... 7 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW .................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Physical Setting Source(s) ............................................................................. 8 4.1.1 Topography ....................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Surface Water ................................................................................... 8 4.1.3 Geology and Soils .............................................................................. 8 4.1.4 Hydrogeology .................................................................................... 9 4.1.5 Oil and Gas Fields .............................................................................. 9 4.1.6 Naturally Occurring Hazardous Materials .............................................. 9 4.2 Standard Environmental Record Sources........................................................ 10 4.2.1 Site .................................................................................................. 10 4.2.2 Offsite.............................................................................................. 10 4.3 Additional Environmental Record Sources ...................................................... 10 4.3.1 Regulatory Agency Consultations ....................................................... 10 4.3.2 Previous Environmental Assessment Reports ....................................... 12 - i - 603154-001 4.4 Historical Use Information on the Property .................................................... 12 4.4.1 Aerial Photographs ............................................................................ 12 4.4.2 Historical Topographic Maps .............................................................. 14 4.4.3 Fire Insurance Maps .......................................................................... 14 4.4.4 Historical City Directories ................................................................... 15 4.4.5 Building Department, Zoning and/or Land Use Records ........................ 15 4.4.6 Other Historical Sources .................................................................... 15 4.4.7 Summary of Historical Land Use ......................................................... 15 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE .........................................................................................16 5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ............................................................ 16 5.2 General Site Setting ..................................................................................... 16 5.3 Exterior and Interior Observations ................................................................ 16 5.3.1 Hazardous Substances, Drums, and Other Chemical Containers ............ 16 5.3.2 Storage Tanks .................................................................................. 16 5.3.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)........................................................ 17 5.3.4 Waste Disposal ................................................................................. 17 5.3.5 Dumping .......................................................................................... 17 5.3.6 Pits, Ponds, Lagoons, Septic Systems, Wastewater, Drains, Cisterns, and Sumps ............................................................................................. 17 5.3.7 Pesticide Use .................................................................................... 17 5.3.8 Staining, Discolored Soils, Corrosion ................................................... 17 5.3.9 Stressed Vegetation .......................................................................... 18 5.3.10 Unusual Odors .................................................................................. 18 5.3.11 Onsite Wells ..................................................................................... 18 5.3.12 Other Observations ........................................................................... 18 6.0 INTERVIEWS .........................................................................................................19 6.1 Interview with Owner .................................................................................. 19 6.2 Interview with Site/Property Manager ........................................................... 19 6.3 Interviews with Occupants ........................................................................... 19 6.4 Interviews with Local Government Officials .................................................... 19 6.5 Interviews with Others ................................................................................. 19 7.0 FINDINGS ..............................................................................................................20
Load more

Recommended publications
  • County of Riverside General Plan San Jacinto Valley Area Plan
    County of Riverside General Plan San Jacinto Valley Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 Page i County of Riverside General Plan San Jacinto Valley Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 San Jacinto River ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 2000
    SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT ACT OF 2000 Public Law 106-351 106th Congress An Act To establish the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in the State of California. <<NOTE: Oct. 24, 2000 - [H.R. 3676]>> Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 2000. 16 USC 431 note.>> SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 2000''. (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Establishment of Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, California. Sec. 3. Management of Federal lands in the National Monument. Sec. 4. Development of management plan. Sec. 5. Existing and historical uses of Federal lands included in Monument. Sec. 6. Acquisition of land. Sec. 7. Local advisory committee. Sec. 8. Authorization of appropriations. SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT, CALIFORNIA. (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following: (1) The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains in southern California contain nationally significant biological, cultural, recreational, geological, educational, and scientific values. (2) The magnificent vistas, wildlife, land forms, and natural and cultural resources of these mountains occupy a unique and challenging position given their proximity to highly urbanized areas of the Coachella Valley. (3) These mountains, which rise abruptly from the desert floor to an elevation of 10,802 feet, provide a picturesque backdrop for Coachella Valley communities and support an abundance of recreational opportunities that are an important regional economic resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Settlement to 1969
    29 Context: Native American Settlement to 1969 Francisco Patencio outside the roundhouse, c. 1940. Source: Palm Springs Historical Society. FINAL DRAFT – FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL City of Palm Springs Citywide Historic Context Statement & Survey Findings HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP 30 CONTEXT: NATIVE AMERICAN SETTLEMENT TO 196923 The earliest inhabitants of the Coachella Valley are the Native people known ethnohistorically as the Cahuilla Indians. The Cahuilla territory includes the areas from the San Jacinto Mountains, the San Gorgonia Pass, and the desert regions reaching east to the Colorado River. The Cahuilla language is part of the Takic branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family and all the Cahuilla groups speak a mutually intelligible despite different dialects. The Cahuilla group that inhabited the Palm Springs area are known as the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. The Cahuilla name for the area that is now Palm Springs is Sec-he, “boiling water,” named for the hot springs located in what is currently the center of the Palm Springs business district. The springs have always provided clean water, bathing, and a connection to the spiritual world, and were used for ceremonial and healing purposes.24 The Cahuilla people refer to themselves as ‘ivi’lyu’atum and are ethnographically divided into two patrilineal moieties: the Wildcats and the Coyotes. Each moiety was further divided into clans which are made up of lineages. Lineages had their own territory and hunting rights within a larger clan territory. There are a number of lineages in the Palm Springs area, which each have religious and political autonomy. Prior to European contact, Cahuilla communities established summer settlements in the palm-lined mountain canyons around the Coachella valley; oral histories and archaeological evidence indicates that they settled in the Tahquitz Canyon at least 5,000 years ago.25 The Cahuilla moved each winter to thatched shelters clustered around the natural mineral hot springs on the valley floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
    Chapter IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES City of Banning General Plan WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT PURPOSE The Water Resources Element addresses water quality, availability and conservation for the City’s current and future needs. The Element also discusses the importance of on-going coordination and cooperation between the City, Banning Heights Mutual Water Company, High Valley Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency and other agencies responsible for supplying water to the region. Topics include the ground water replenishment program, consumptive demand of City residents, and wastewater management and its increasingly important role in the protection of ground water resources. The goals, policies and programs set forth in this element direct staff and other City officials in the management of this essential resource. BACKGROUND The Water Resources Element is directly related to the Land Use Element, in considering the availability of water resources to meet the land use plan; and has a direct relationship to the Flooding and Hydrology Element, in its effort to protect and enhance groundwater recharge. Water issues are also integral components of the following elements: Police and Fire Protection, Economic Development, Emergency Preparedness, and Water, Wastewater and Utilities. The Water Resources Element addresses topics set forth in California Government Code Section 65302(d). Also, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 21083.2(g), the City is empowered to require that adequate research and documentation be conducted when the potential for significant impacts to water and other important resources exists. Watersheds The westernmost part of the planning area is located at the summit of the San Gorgonio Pass, which divides two major watersheds: the San Jacinto River Watershed to the west and the Salton Sea watershed to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.9 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES the Information Contained Within This
    5.9 Biological Resources 5.9 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The information contained within this section is summarized from the Moreno Valley General Plan EIR Biological Report (Merkel & Associates, September 2004). The report is provided in Volume II Appendix E of this EIR. The existing biological resources documented in this report were determined through an extensive review of the most current, available biological literature and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) data available for the planning area. Previous biological surveys conducted by Merkel & Associates (M&A) staff, as well as biological information gathered by other consultants for projects within Moreno Valley, were further reviewed. Vegetation communities were primarily identified based on the regional GIS data incorporated into the MSHCP (KTU+A and PSBS 1995). Floral and faunal species potential presence was determined based on vegetation community presence/absence and knowledge of species requirements. The assessment of presence or potential presence of sensitive biological resources was also based on MSHCP data, which incorporated California Natural Diversity Database records for sensitive species. In addition to the MSHCP and vegetation community information, the following sources were consulted to aid in determining faunal presence/absence: USFWS 2000b, Ericksen and Belk 1999, Sauer et al. 1996, Sauer et al. 2000, Zeiner et al. 1988, Zeiner et al. 1990a and 1990b. M&A also contacted individuals with special expertise to determine the likelihood of species presence for certain groups (e.g., bats). Additionally, M&A biologists, Craig Reiser and Diana Jensen, conducted field investigations in April 2001 to ground truth portions of the regional GIS vegetation data and record locations of identified sensitive species.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA JAIL PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION May 16-18, 2018 CJPA Quarterly Conference Hosted by Riverside County
    CALIFORNIA JAIL PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION May 16-18, 2018 CJPA Quarterly Conference Hosted by Riverside County Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:00 – 12:00 CJPA Board Meeting – Open to all members Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility Sheriff’s Inmate Training and Education Bureau (SITE-B) Conference Room 1627 S. Hargrave Street, Banning, CA 92220 12:00 – 1:00 Lunch – provided by 1:00 – 3:00 Optional Tour of SITE-B Campus 1627 S. Hargrave Street, Banning, CA 92220 5:30 PM No host dinner at Chili’s Restaurant 1490 E. 2nd Street, Beaumont, CA 92223 Thursday, May 17, 2018 8:00 – 8:30 Continental Breakfast – provided by Highland Springs Resort Highland Springs Resort, Conference Room 10600 Highland Springs Ave., Cherry Valley, CA 92223 8:30 – 9:00 Welcome by Riverside County Sheriff Executive Staff Assistant Sheriff Jerry Gutierrez 9:00 – 9:45 Keynote Speaker—Dr. Mark Emerson ReEntry: Life Changing Programs Mark Emerson, PhD, RSAT Program Graduate RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT 4095 Lemon Street • Riverside, California 92501 9: 45 – 10:00 Break 10:00 - 11:30 ReEntry Workshop Working with the Work Resistant Client and Ex-Offender Larry Robbin, Executive Director Robbin and Associates 11:30 – 12:00 Networking Lunch – provided by Highland Springs Resort 12:00 – 1:00 Job Retention Larry Robbin, Executive Director Robbin and Associates 1:00 – 1:15 Break 1:15 – 2:30 Program Design Larry Robbin, Executive Director Robbin and Associates 2:30 – 2:45 Break 2:45 – 4:00 Pass Job Connection: Reentry Resources and Services Mary Hamlin, Director 5:30 Dinner hosted by TBD at Victor’s Restaurant and Bar 1620 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential for Use of Effluent Wastewater Treated by Soil Aquifer Treatment in Banning, California
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations Office of aduateGr Studies 6-2015 POTENTIAL FOR USE OF EFFLUENT WASTEWATER TREATED BY SOIL AQUIFER TREATMENT IN BANNING, CALIFORNIA Arturo Castro Vela California State University - San Bernardino Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd Part of the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Vela, Arturo Castro, "POTENTIAL FOR USE OF EFFLUENT WASTEWATER TREATED BY SOIL AQUIFER TREATMENT IN BANNING, CALIFORNIA" (2015). Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 210. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/210 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of aduateGr Studies at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POTENTIAL FOR USE OF EFFLUENT WASTEWATER TREATED BY SOIL AQUIFER TREATMENT IN BANNING, CALIFORNIA A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Earth and Environmental Sciences: Professional Sciences Masters by Arturo Castro Vela June 2015 POTENTIAL FOR USE OF EFFLUENT WASTEWATER TREATED BY SOIL AQUIFER TREATMENT IN BANNING, CALIFORNIA A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Arturo Castro Vela June 2015 Approved by: Dr. James A. Noblet, Committee Chair, Chemistry Dr. Brett Stanley, Committee Member Ann Marie Loconte, P.E., Committee Member © 2015 Arturo Castro Vela ABSTRACT With the ever increasing demand for potable water due to the continued increase in population coupled with the threat of California’s current drought, water will remain a limited resource that must be managed responsibly.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the SUNNYMEAD 7.5' QUADRANGLE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Stratigraphic Code
    Prepared in cooperation with the CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES AIR FORCE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 01-450 117o 15' 117o 07' 30" CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS 34o 00' 34o 00' QafQaf Qw Qf Qa Qls VERY YOUNG SURFICIAL DEPOSITS—Sediment recently San Timoteo beds of Frick (1921) (Pleistocene and Ktm Tonalite and mafic rocks, undifferentiated (Cretaceous)—Mainly Holocene transported and deposited in channels and washes, on surfaces of alluvial Pliocene)—Lithologically diverse sandstone, conglomeratic sandstone, biotite-hornblende tonalite containing mixed mafic rocks and subequal Qyw Qyf Qya Qyv Qyls fans and alluvial plains, and on hillslopes. Soil-profile development is non- and conglomerate; nearly all sandstone is arkosic and much is lithic. amounts of mafic inclusions. Inclusion borders mostly gradational and existant. Includes: Named by Frick (1921) for upper Pliocene, vertebrate-bearing, ill-defined. Restricted to single occurance north of US Highway 60 Qof Qols Pleistocene Qaf Artificial fill (late Holocene)—Deposits of fill resulting from human nonmarine strata in San Timoteo Canyon. Upper part of San Timoteo Freeway, west of Hendrick Road QUATERNARY Qvof Qvof1 Qvols construction or mining activities; restricted to east edge of quadrangle, beds contain vertebrate fauna of earliest Pleistocene Irvingtonian I age Kqd Quartz diorite, undifferentiated (Cretaceous)—Mainly biotite- CENOZOIC specifically to off-ramp construction along US Highway 60 Freeway (Repenning, 1987); Eckis (1934) had earlier suggested a Pleistocene hornblende quartz diorite; coarse-grained. Restricted to single Very young alluvial wash deposits (late Holocene)— occurrence in southeastern corner of quadrangle QTstu Qw Deposits of active age for upper part of section.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography of Coachella Valley Curriculum Guide
    Exploring the Geography of Coachella Valley A Curriculum Guide for Grade 3, Standard 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Table of Contents 1 Unit Overview 2 Common Core State Standards: Reading Standards for Information Text 2 Academic History-Social Science Content Standards for Grade 3 2 Kindergarten to Grade 5 Historical and Social Sciences Analysis Skills 3 Focus Questions and Assessment 3 Geography of the Coachella Valley – Background Information for the Teacher 4 Supplies Needed 6 Lesson 1: Location Match-Up 8 Lesson 2: Looking at Earth 11 Lesson 3: Where I Live 14 Lesson 4: Geographic Terms and Definitions 16 Lesson 5: Right Here in the Coachella Valley 20 Lesson 6: Geographical Features of Coachella Valley 24 Lesson 7: Human-Made Features of Coachella Valley 29 Lesson 8: Communityville 31 Extended Activities 39 Unit 3.1 Exploring the Geography of Coachella Valley Page 1 Unit Overview: Exploring the Geography of Coachella Valley __________________________________________________________________________________ Description of the Unit The unit begins with Matching Vocabulary Cards that help students learn the name of their city, county, state, nation, continent, hemisphere, and planet. In Lesson 2, students use a variety of maps to find these geographic locations while in Lesson 3 they construct a “Flip-Book” titled “Where I Live.” In Lessons 4 and 5, students study geographic terms and definitions and use local maps to identify key geographical features in the Coachella Valley. In Lessons 5 and 6, students construct a map of the Coachella Valley and identify key geographical features and human-made features. The focus in Lesson 8 is on how the natural environment of “Communityville” has been changed over time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cahuilla Indians
    Student Reader The Cahuilla Indians Acknowledgements CO-AUTHOR AND PROJECT DIRECTOR: Priscilla H. Porter, Ed.D. Professor Emeritus of Education, California State University, Dominguez Hills Dr. Priscilla H. Porter is the former Director for the Center for History-Social Science Education at California State University, Dominguez Hills. She is the author of numerous teacher manuals and publications. Dr. Porter is currently the senior author of Reflections, a Kindergarten to Grade 6 social studies textbook series published by Harcourt School Publishers @2007 and adopted by the State of California. Currently, Dr. Porter is the Director of Porter History-Social Science Resource Room located at the Palm Desert Campus of California State University San Bernardino. CO-AUTHOR: Lowell J. Bean, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, California State University, Hayward The content in this student reader is adapted from the work of Dr. Lowell J. Bean and his book Mukat’s People: The Cahuilla Indians of Southern California, the definitive resource for information regarding the Cahuilla Indians published by the University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 1974. ISBN #0-520-02627-6. Special recognition goes to Amiya Linton of the Palm Springs Unified School District for her initial design and organization of the student reader and her editing of the curriculum guide. Special thanks to O’Jay Vanegas of the Agua Caliente Cultural Museum, Palm Springs, California for his guidance and review of the material. Special gratitude to Dr. Fred Jandt, Dean of the Palm Desert Campus of California State University San Bernardino. Note: In this Student Reader: The Culture of the Cahuilla Indians, the past tense is used to place the Cahuilla culture in historical perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting
    TN/City of Banning Comprehensive General Plan/Draft EIR Section II – Regional Environmental Setting CITY OF BANNING COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SECTION II. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Introduction This section of the EIR provides a general introduction to the environmental setting of the Banning Pass area, of which the City of Banning is at the center. Discussions are based on a regional perspective to provide a broad and comprehensive understanding of the issues associated with implementation of the proposed General Plan. Topics discussed include existing and surrounding land use patterns in Banning and the vicinity, regional climate, topography, soils and geology, and biological resources. Also addressed are air quality issues, cultural resources, traffic and circulation, visual resources, and public services and facilities. The City of Banning conducted an Initial Study in accordance with Section 15063, 15064, and 15065 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (see Appendix A). Issues identified as potentially significant in the Initial Study are analyzed in detail in Section III of this document. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) for this EIR was transmitted on January 7, 2005 and comments received are included in Appendix A of this document. The General Plan study area encompasses a total of approximately 23.2± square miles of incorporated City lands, including about 8.5± square miles of Sphere-of-Influence lands, and about 5.2± square miles outside the SOI and the City but within the General Plan study area. A. Existing Land Use Development in the City of Banning is focused primarily on the valley floor along U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Beaumont General Plan
    City of Beaumont General Plan City of Beaumont 550 East Sixth Street Beaumont, California 92223 Approved March 2007 City of Beaumont General Plan Table of Contents Section Page 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Authority of the General Plan ................................................................................ 4 1.2 Scope of the General Plan .................................................................................. ..4 1.3 Vision Statement ................................................................................................. ..6 1.4 Overview of the City ............................................................................................ ..8 2. Community Development Element..............................................................................................................................13 2.1 Introduction to the Element ............................................................................... ..14 2.2 Community Development Policies..................................................................... ..14 2.3 Community Development Plan.......................................................................... ..20 3. Circulation Element.............................................................................................................................................................37 3.1 Introduction to the Element
    [Show full text]