Good King Charles Study Guide New.Pub

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

In Good King Charles’s Golden Days

By Bernard Shaw

ONNECTIONS

C

Shaw Festival Study Guide

The Shaw Story 2
The Players 3 The Story 4
The Playwright 5 Who’s Who 6-7
Director’s Notes 8
Designer’s Notes 9-10 Production History 11 World of the Play 12-16
Did You Know? 17
Say What? 18
Sources 19
Activities 20-32

THE SHAW STORY

MANDATE

The Shaw Festival is the only theatre in the world which exclusively focuses on plays by Bernard Shaw and his contemporaries, including plays written during, or about the period of Shaw’s lifetime (1856 – 1950).

The Shaw Festival’s mandate also includes: • Uncovered Gems – digging up undiscovered theatrical treasures, or plays which were considered major works when they were written but which have since been unjustly neglected
• American Classics – we continue to celebrate the best of American theatre • Musicals – musical treats either from, or set during the period of our mandate • Canadian Work – to allow us to hear and promote our own stories, and our own points of view about the mandate period.

WHAT MAKES SHAW SPECIAL

MEET THE COMPANY — OUR ENSEMBLE

Our Actors: All Shaw performers contribute to the sense of ensemble, much like the players in an orchestra. Often, smaller parts are played by actors who are leading performers in their own right, but in our “orchestra,” they support the central action helping to create a density of experiences that are both subtle and informative.
Our Designers: Every production that graces the Shaw Festival stages is built “from scratch,” from an original design. Professional designers lead teams who collaborate with each production’s director to create set, costumes, and lighting designs that complement the play’s text.
Our Music: Music played an important role in Bernard Shaw’s life – in fact, he wrote music criticism for several years under the pseudonym Corno di Bassetto. Just as the reach of musical theatre is vast and manifold, so is The Shaw’s approach - presenting Brecht and Weill, Rodgers and Hart, and everything in between.
Our Play Development: The goals of Shaw’s Play Development Program include: 1) to develop new adaptations and translations that will tell classic stories in a contemporary way; 2) to produce new plays alongside those of Shaw and his contemporaries.

Festival Theatre

GEORGE BERNARD SHAW

As Artistic Director Jackie Maxwell says, “We all know the man can talk, but Bernard Shaw is also one of the most prescient, provocative, sparklingly articulate writers in the English language. His words and ideas, expressed in plays that are well-known, such as this season’s The Devil’s Disciple, or in plays that are not so familiar but no less interesting, have extraordinary relevance today. It is a joy to draw attention to those ideas and bring them to life on our stages.”

Court House Theatre

OUR THEATRES

The Shaw Festival presents plays in three distinctive theatres. The Festival Theatre with 869 seats is The Shaw’s flagship theatre; the historic Court House where The Shaw first began performing seats 327; and the Royal George Theatre, modeled after an Edwardian opera house, holds 328.

THE SHAW’S COAT OF ARMS

In 1987, on the occasion of our 25th Anniversary, the Shaw Festival became the second theatre company in the world to be granted a Coat of Arms by the College of Heralds. A large painted sculpture of our Coat of Arms adorns the lobby of the Festival Theatre.

Royal George Theatre

2

ONNECTIONS

C

Shaw Festival Study Guide

ONNECTIONS

C

THE PLAYERS

Study Guide

James, Duke of York King Charles II
ANDREW BUNKER BENEDICT CAMPBELL LISA CODRINGTON

A practical, hands-on resource for the classroom which contains background information for the play, suggested themes for discussion, and Ontario curriculum-based activities. Designed by educators and theatre professionals, the activities and themes for discussion are organized in modules that can be used independently or interdependently according to the class level and time

Louise de Kéouaille, Duchess of Portsmouth

  • Nell Gwynn
  • NICOLA CORREIA-DAMUDE

  • MARY HANEY
  • Mrs Basham

Barbara Villiers, Duchess of Cleveland Sally
CLAIRE JULLIEN ESTHER MALONEY
Queen Catherine of Braganza LAURIE PATON

  • George Fox
  • RIC REID

Isaac Newton Godfrey Kneller
GRAEME SOMERVILLE KEN JAMES STEWART

availability. In Good King Charles’s Golden Days is recommended for students in grade 9 and higher.

THE ARTISTIC TEAM

  • Director
  • EDA HOLMES

This guide was

  • Set Designer
  • CAMELLIA KOO

written and compiled by Suzanne Merriam and Amanda Tripp. Additional materials were provided by Joanna Falck, Eda Holmes, Camellia Koo, and Michael Gianfrancesco

Costume Designer Lighting Designer
MICHAEL GIANFRANCESCO BONNIE BEECHER

THE STORY

A philosopher, a religious leader, an artist, an actress and a King meet at Sir Isaac Newton’s house. The set-up for a joke? No, it’s Shaw’s Restoration comedy, where everything from geometry to art to love potions are debated and discussed by some of history’s leading figures. If only King Charles’s mistresses would stop interrupting!

Cover: Julie Martell, Claire Jullien, Lisa Codrington Photo by Shin Sugino

Previews April 17 Opens May 21 Closes October 9

3

ONNECTIONS

C

Shaw Festival Study Guide

In Good King Charles’s Golden Days

A True History That Never Happened

Such a lot of interesting people lived then and he is throwing them all in together to sink or swim

By Bernard Shaw

he play’s subtitle, A True History That Never Happened , gives us an insight

T

into Shaw’s almost whimsical approach to this fascinating and humorous play. In writing it, he took the opportunity to play the ‘what if’ game: what might have happened had several prominent men of history met at the height of their powers? What if a leading scientist had a painter, a religious leader and a King to his house for a good discussion? And what if this discussion was, on occasion, interrupted by one or several of the King’s mistresses? The result was In Good King Charles’s Golden Days - a witty and decidedly Shavian take on some great men (and women) of history.

Charlotte Shaw

The men that gather in the play include the host for the gathering, the great philosopher and scientist Sir Isaac Newton. His guests are leading portrait painter Godfrey Kneller, religious rebel and founder of the Quakers George Fox, King Charles II and Charles’s argumentative brother, James II. Between them they discuss almost everything: questions of leadership (all of them being leaders in his own field) along with arguments about art versus science versus religion. Even King Charles expresses his excitement in anticipation of the discussion:

(wife of Bernard

Shaw)

Charles: I confess to unbounded curiosity to hear what George Fox can have to say to Isaac Newton. It is not altogether an impertinent curiosity. My trade, which is a very unusual one, requires that I should know what Tom, Dick and Harry have to say to one another. I find you two gentlemen much more interesting and infinitely more important.

And into this mix of great men, Shaw introduces a few great women - to “relieve the intellectual tension”. Nell Gwynn, the famous comic actress; Barbara Villiers, Duchess of Cleveland, one of Charles’ most notorious mistresses who had five of his illegitimate children and held great power in his court; Louise De Kerouaille, Duchess of Portsmouth, a mistress from France who was known for maintaining her ‘baby face’ good looks throughout her life.

They each come to Sir Isaac Newton’s house looking for Charles, and none is too happy to find the other there. However, they hold their own with the great men and bring their own insights to discussions of science, religion, art, and love. When the Duchess accuses Charles of having been unfaithful to her “a thousand times”, Newton calculates with absolute mathematical precision that King Charles would have to be almost three hundred years old for that to be true: “Figures cannot mock, because they cannot feel. That is their great quality and their great fault,” he tells her.

As in last year’s hit Getting Married, they fall into both serious and comic debate about big topics–it’s another great discussion play that only Shaw could write.

4

ONNECTIONS

C

Shaw Festival Study Guide

BERNARD SHAW

An acclaimed dramatist, critic, and social reformer Bernard Shaw was born in Dublin

where he grew up in an atmosphere of genteel poverty. He attended four schools and was tutored by a clerical uncle, but left his formal education behind him at the age of fifteen. He developed a wide knowledge of music, art, and literature under the influence of his mother, a singer and vocal music teacher, and as a result of his visits to the National Gallery of Ireland. In 1876 he moved to London, where he spent his afternoons in the British Museum and his evenings pursuing his informal education in the form of lectures and debates. Shaw declared himself a socialist in 1882 and joined the Fabian Society in 1884. He soon distinguished himself as a fluent and

effective public speaker, as well as an incisive and irreverent critic of music, art, and drama.

Shaw’s first play, Widowers’ Houses, was produced privately in 1892 for the members of the Independent Theatre Society. Shaw achieved his first commercial success with the American premiere of The Devil’s Disciple, the income from which enabled him to quit his job as a drama critic and to make his living solely as a

playwright.

In 1898 he married Charlotte Payne-Townshend, an Irish heiress whom he had met through his Fabian friends Beatrice and Sidney Webb.

Harley Granville-Barker, a young actor-manager, helped to advance Shaw’s popularity in London with his famous repertory experiment at the Royal Court Theatre from 1904 to 1907. Of the “thousand performances” of this venture, over 700 were of plays by Shaw, including the premieres of John Bull’s Other Island (1904), Man and Superman (1905), Major Barbara (1905), and The Doctor’s Dilemma (1906). Shaw’s best-known play, Pygmalion, was first performed in 1913. Two generations later, it attained even greater fame as the musical My Fair Lady.

During World War I, Shaw’s anti-war speeches and a controversial pamphlet entitled Common Sense About the War made him very unpopular as a public figure. In Heartbreak House (performed 1920) Shaw exposed, in a country-house setting on the eve of the War, the spiritual bankruptcy of the generation responsible for the carnage. Next came Back to Methuselah (1922) and Saint Joan (1923), acclaim for which led to the awarding of the

Nobel Prize for Literature in1925. Shaw continued to write

plays and essays until his death in 1950 at the age of 94.

A bachelor, an Irishman, a vegetar- ian, a fluent liar, a social-democrat, a lecturer and debater, a lover of music, a fierce opponent of the present status of women, and an insister on the seriousness of art

IN HIS OWN

WORDS...

5

ONNECTIONS

C

Shaw Festival Study Guide

Who’s Who

In Good King Charles’s Golden Days

*KING CHARLES II (1630 -1685) King of England from 1660-1685. He was briefly King of Scotland after his father’s execution in 1649. But Charles’s invasion of England in 1651 ended in his defeat at Worcester, followed by a humiliating flight to France. Two years after Oliver Cromwell’s death in 1658, a reconstituted Parliament restored the throne to Charles - on Parliament’s terms. (Shaw described Charles II as “the first king of England whose kingship was purely symbolic”.) In the Restoration period under this “Merry Monarch”, the arts and sciences flourished in reaction to their suppression during Cromwell’s Commonwealth.

*SIR ISAAC NEWTON (1642 -1727) Newton's reflecting telescope, made in 1668, brought him to the attention of the scientific community. In1672 he was made a Fellow of the Royal Society. He also studied and published works on history, theology and alchemy. In 1687, with the support of his friend the astronomer Edmond Halley, Newton published his single greatest work, the 'Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathmatica' ('Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy'). This showed how a universal force, gravity, applied to all objects in all parts of the universe. By the early 1700s he was the dominant figure in British and European scientific societies.

*SIR GODFREY KNELLER (1646-1723) Born in Germany, Kneller studied in

Amsterdam and arrived in England around the year 1675. He became the leading portrait painter in England during the late 17th century, and was principle painter to the King. In the preface to In Good King Charles’s Golden Days, Shaw admits that it was William Hogarth, and not Kneller, who said “the line of beauty is a curve” - many decades after the time of this play.

*JAMES, DUKE OF YORK (1633-1701) Became James II after the death of his brother Charles II. The fourth and last of the Stuart kings, James was very unpopular due to his high-handed attitudes and his Catholic sympathies. His reign lasted only three years. In 1685 he fought off an invasion by the Duke of Monmouth, Charles’s eldest illegitimate son. In 1688 some prominent Englishmen invited James’s Protestant daughter Mary and her Dutch husband William of Orange to seize the throne, in what became known as the Glorious (or Bloodless) Revolution.

* Portrait painted by Godfrey Kneller

6

GEORGE FOX (1624 -1691) Founded the ‘Quakers’ or Society of Friends. Puzzled by the inconsistency between what Christians said they believed and the way they behaved, Fox became a religious activist at the age of 19. He was imprisoned eight times for preaching views that annoyed the religious and political establishment of his time. Fox's aim was to inspire people to live by the principles of their faith. He objected to the hierarchical structure and the rituals of the churches of his time. He thought that believers should have a direct relationship with God and that no person (priests, for example) and no thing should come between them. Not surprisingly, these views infuriated the mainstream churches, and Quakers were persecuted in Britain until 1689.

CATHERINE OF BRAGANZA (1638 -1705) Wife of Charles II, was Queen of England until Charles’s death in 1685. She had no children. In 1678, a group of Protestants led by Titus Oates invented a “Popish Plot” which accused Catherine of complicity in a plot to kill Charles and place his Catholic brother James on the throne. In the end this “plot” was discredited and Catherine was cleared of any wrongdoing. Catherine helped reconcile Charles to the Catholic faith shortly before he died. In 1692 she returned to Portugal, where she was regent for her ailing brother King Pedro II.

NELL GWYNN (1650 -1687) According to legend, she began her theatrical career as an orange-seller. Her vivacity and charm soon made her Drury Lane’s leading comedienne. Though virtually illiterate, Nell was an enchanting presence on the stage, especially admired for her impudent prologues and epilogues. In 1670 she retired from the stage, becoming the King’s mistress and bearing him two sons. On his deathbed, Charles is said to have begged his brother James: “Let not poor Nelly starve”. James paid off Nell’s debts and provided her with a generous pension for the rest of her short life.

LOUISE DE KÉROUAILLE (1649 -1734) Was reputed to be a French spy. It is more likely that she served Charles in gaining secret financial support from France’s “Sun King,” Louis XIV, for Charles’s administration. She was made Duchess of Portsmouth in 1673, the year after she bore Charles a son.

BARBARA VILLIERS (1641 -1709) Duchess of Cleveland after 1670, was Charles II’s favourite mistress for the decade following his Restoration. The King acknowledged five of her seven children as his own. After losing his favour to Louise de Kéroualle, Villiers consoled herself with other lovers such as John Churchill, later first Duke of Marlborough, and the playwright William Wycherley. In 1677 she settled in Paris, returning to England just before Charles’s death in 1685.

7

Eda Holmes talks about directing In Good King Charles’s Golden Days

Q: What’s your vision of the play? A: My vision for the play centers around two things 1) the notion of people who have ideas that are so full of passion that they are driven to arguments, fits, and fist fights and 2) a time machine that allows these historical figures to exist fully alive forever so that through them we can wrestle with the basic issues of politics, religion, science, and human relations with a view that looks both back at history and forward to our own world.

Q: Who would you suggest as the ideal audience for your production? A: I suppose the ideal audience for this play would be anyone with a passion for science, politics, religion or art. Shaw himself said that the perfect audience for his plays would be a pack of philosophers — so really that means anyone who is thrilled by thinking.

Q: Have you ever directed this playwright’s work before? A: No!

Q: What do you find most interesting about this playwright? About the play? A: I am overwhelmed by his unquenchable curiosity about humanity; I am charmed by his imagination; I am humbled by his political commitment as a socialist; I am in awe of his extraordinary intellect that never shrank from challenging assumptions about the world. In Good King Charles’s Golden Days is like a celebration of his curiosity, imagination, political thought, and humanity. And it is funny, which is truly a feat of genius.

Q: What do you want us to tell people about your work on this play? A That I tried really hard.

Q: How accessible will our production be for students and what do you want younger audience members to know about the play’s message and your direction? A: My direction will be as accessible as the play. I would like the younger audience members to come away with a notion of ideas being extremely passion-filled and exciting. I don’t think that it is as accessible as say, Shaw’s Arms and the Man though — there is a lot of British history in it — but the outfits are great.

8

ONNECTIONS

C

Shaw Festival Study Guide

Camellia Koo talks about designing the set

Q: Can you describe your vision for In Good King Charles’s Golden Days? A: The play is a collision of humanity and a collision of ideas, so we used Newton's theories on gravity and his model for the universe/solar system as our main inspiration. The set resembles both an orrery, a model/mobile of the solar system, as well as the elliptical shape of a planet's orbit, while at the same time, placing us slightly abstractly, as opposed to naturalistically in Newton's study. The entire set floats in a void, like a celestial body does in space. In Act II, we go to a more intimate location and another form of orrery comes into play. The characters in the play circle around each other, both verbally and physically, and then spontaneously break into fist fights, and at the centre of it all sits King Charles II, in disguise but ever present; the planets elliptically orbiting around the sun, on inevitable collision courses with each other.

Q: Have you previously designed plays by Bernard Shaw? A: I designed Heartbreak House for a set design project while in second year of theatre school. It was only a paper project (texts analysis, research, drafting, making a maquette and doing a final design presentation of the model). In Good King Charles's Golden Days will be the first produced/staged play of Bernard Shaw that I've designed.

Q: What do you find most striking about In Good King Charles’s Golden Days? A: I love what the characters talk about, argue about, in this play...religion vs. science, war vs. peace, circles vs. ellipses, straight lines vs. curves...

Q: What do you want audience members to know about your design? A: I hope the audience members pick up on the subtle details of the set that reflect what the characters talk about. Also, Newton's study is full of his many wide ranging experiments, but the whole room is also a sort of bell jar for the collision of characters that Bernard Shaw wrote to exist inside it.

The orrery model (left) is one of the images that influenced the design of the set. A model of the set (maquette) is pictured on the right.

9

ONNECTIONS

C

Shaw Festival Study Guide

Michael Gianfrancesco talks about designing the costumes

Recommended publications
  • Thames Valley Papists from Reformation to Emancipation 1534 - 1829

    Thames Valley Papists from Reformation to Emancipation 1534 - 1829

    Thames Valley Papists From Reformation to Emancipation 1534 - 1829 Tony Hadland Copyright © 1992 & 2004 by Tony Hadland All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without prior permission in writing from the publisher and author. The moral right of Tony Hadland to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 0 9547547 0 0 First edition published as a hardback by Tony Hadland in 1992. This new edition published in soft cover in April 2004 by The Mapledurham 1997 Trust, Mapledurham HOUSE, Reading, RG4 7TR. Pre-press and design by Tony Hadland E-mail: [email protected] Printed by Antony Rowe Limited, 2 Whittle Drive, Highfield Industrial Estate, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN23 6QT. E-mail: [email protected] While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, neither the author nor the publisher can be held responsible for any loss or inconvenience arising from errors contained in this work. Feedback from readers on points of accuracy will be welcomed and should be e-mailed to [email protected] or mailed to the author via the publisher. Front cover: Mapledurham House, front elevation. Back cover: Mapledurham House, as seen from the Thames. A high gable end, clad in reflective oyster shells, indicated a safe house for Catholics.
  • Shaw Festival Mourns the Loss of Director Neil Munro Media Release #23

    Shaw Festival Mourns the Loss of Director Neil Munro Media Release #23

    Shaw Festival mourns the loss of director Neil Munro Media Release #23 Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, July 13, 2009…The Shaw Festival Company is deeply saddened to announce today the passing of long-time Resident Director, Neil Munro. Mr. Munro died July 13, 2009 at the age of 62 at London Ontario’s University Hospital after a lengthy illness. He is predeceased by his wife Carole Galloway and is survived by his sister Anna Munro, nephew John Munro and his mother-in-law Stella Galloway and sister-in-law Jackie Martinez. On making this announcement, Jackie Maxwell commented: “Neil Munro created an indelible mark on the Shaw Festival. As a director he had a vision that was unique — blending extraordinarily detailed preparation with brilliant and at times outrageous ideas, always in the service of illuminating and revitalizing each play. His passion for theatre was immense, only matched by that for the artists he worked with – especially actors. As Resident Director, his commitment to and love for the Ensemble and all it stood for was clear daily as was his brilliant sceptical humour which unsuccessfully hid his true warmth and empathy. We already miss him terribly but our vivid memories of his talent and his passion will live on here at The Shaw, and I know, in the hearts of the many, many Canadians artists whose lives he touched.” Mr. Munro has been one of Canadian theatre’s most vital artists for more than 35 years as a director, actor and playwright. He is revered at The Shaw as a director who brought a fascinating and often controversial directorial touch to many plays, notably, his recent productions of Somerset Maugham’s The Circle and Tennessee Williams’ Summer and Smoke (2007).
  • Deixis and the Renaissance Art of Self Construction1

    Deixis and the Renaissance Art of Self Construction1

    1 Deixis and the renaissance art of self construction Sylvia ADAMSON University of Sheffield ABSTRACT This paper is offered as a contribution to our understanding of both the history of literary style and the psychology of reading. I begin with a comparison with art history, where the development of the technique of linear perspective provides a stylistic boundary-marker between medieval and renaissance styles. Identifying the ‘printed voice effect’ as an analogous demarcator in literary history, I explore the technical means by which the effect was created, in a set of case-studies representing the emergent genres of essay and dramatic lyric. My analytical model is adapted from Gombrich’s account of ‘guided projection,’ which explains pictorial illusion as the cooperative creation of the artist (who provides the visual cues) and the spectator (who interprets them). I argue that the literary equivalent to the geometric cues of perspective is to be found in the linguistic system of deixis and claim that renaissance texts show an innovative and experimental awareness of the deictic resources of the English language. KEYWORDS: deixis, renaissance, historicism, self in literature, language and style 1. The printed voice In the history of art forms, some stylistic innovations seem to demand the title revolutionary, if only because their effects are so striking as to be felt by the non-professional observer. In the western 1 I am grateful to the organisers of 15 SEDERI for inviting me to give the plenary on which this paper is based and to the conference participants for their helpful responses to my presentation.
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted

    DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv2w736 Author Harkins, Robert Lee Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief.
  • 2018 SEASON April 4 to October 28 Niagara-On-The-Lake, Ontario Tim Carroll, Artistic Director Tim Jennings, Executive Director

    2018 SEASON April 4 to October 28 Niagara-On-The-Lake, Ontario Tim Carroll, Artistic Director Tim Jennings, Executive Director

    2018 SEASON April 4 to October 28 Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario Tim Carroll, Artistic Director Tim Jennings, Executive Director 1.800.511.SHAW 1 Contents Welcome from the Artistic Director 1 2018 Season Plays 2 Reading Series 23 Secret Theatre 25 Acting Ensemble 26 Ticket Prices + Marquee Seating 28 Theatres 29 Ways to Save + Policies 30 How to Order 32 Calendar 32 Stay the Night 48 Membership 50 Beyond the Stage — for Friends 51 Beyond the Stage — for All 52 Beyond the Stage — for Young People 54 Sponsors 56 Getting Here 57 We acknowledge and honour the land upon which we gather as the historic and traditional territory of First Nations peoples. In particular we recognize and thank the Neutral Nation, the Mississauga and the Haudenosaunee for their stewardship of these lands over millennia. , 2017) , 2017) Credits Design: Key Gordon Communications | keygordon.com Joan Saint Edited by: Nathalie Ivany-Becchetti Me and My Girl Ensemble photography: David Cooper Backstage photography: Christopher Wahl Ancillary and Niagara photography: Cosmo Condina Photography Photography for: The Magician’s Nephew, Grand Hotel, The Hound of the Baskervilles, Stage Kiss and The Orchard (After Chekhov) by Peter Andrew Lusztyk Irving ( Jeff Cover: ( Emily Lukasik page: This 1.800.511.SHAW 2 My second season This company has amazing musical performers. Grand Hotel is a blockbuster is a chance to put musical with a bit of everything: passion, into practice what crime, laughter, a wonderful score and I learnt in my first. great dancing. Our audience loves brilliant writing, for So, what did young or old.
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted

    DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted

    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
  • Arcadia Disjointed: Confrontations with Texts, Polemical, Utopian, and Picaresque

    Arcadia Disjointed: Confrontations with Texts, Polemical, Utopian, and Picaresque

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1991 Arcadia Disjointed: Confrontations With Texts, Polemical, Utopian, and Picaresque. Deborah Ann Jacobs Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Jacobs, Deborah Ann, "Arcadia Disjointed: Confrontations With Texts, Polemical, Utopian, and Picaresque." (1991). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5126. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5126 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
  • THE ANGLO-PORTUGUESE SOCIETY 70 Years of History (1938

    THE ANGLO-PORTUGUESE SOCIETY 70 Years of History (1938

    Who we are The Anglo-Portuguese Society is a registered charity in England, 313589 governed by an Executive Committee, appointed by its members. Our Objectives: The objectives of the Society are: The education of the people of the United Kingdom about THE ANGLO-PORTUGUESE SOCIETY Portugal, its people and its culture; The relief from suffering of the people of Portugal and of the United Kingdom. 70 Years of History (1938 – 2008) By Carol Mason (Rankin) 2018 Reprint The Anglo-Portuguese Society 7-8 Great James Street London WC1N 3DF Tel: 0203 371 8767 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apsociety.co.uk THE ANGLO-PORTUGUESE SOCIETY – 70 years of history b) exhibitions, demonstrations and illustrations of the intellectual, artistic and economic life of Portugal; by Carol Mason (Rankin) c) lectures, conferences and functions. The first lecture took place on 26th January 1939 when the renowned historian In 1938 a group of business men in London with interests in Portugal planned and Portuguese scholar Professor Edgar Prestage addressed members. The a dinner in honour of the newly arrived Portuguese Ambassador , Dr. Armindo following month a Portuguese Fortnight took place in London with the active Monteiro. participation of the Society and in May that year a Library was started in the The affair held at The Dorchester Hotel on May 19th grew into a splendid Casa de Portugal. The outbreak of World War II obviously meant activities occasion, attended by over three hundred people with the Rt. Hon. Sir Francis were curtailed, but a luncheon was held at the Vintners Hall in July 1940 in Lindley presidingi.
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early M

    UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early M

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early Modern England and Iberia A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in English by Sara Victoria Torres 2014 © Copyright by Sara Victoria Torres 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early Modern England and Iberia by Sara Victoria Torres Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Los Angeles, 2014 Professor Christine Chism, Co-chair Professor Lowell Gallagher, Co-chair My dissertation, “Marvelous Generations: Lancastrian Genealogies and Translation in Late Medieval and Early Modern England and Iberia,” traces the legacy of dynastic internationalism in the fifteenth, sixteenth, and early-seventeenth centuries. I argue that the situated tactics of courtly literature use genealogical and geographical paradigms to redefine national sovereignty. Before the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588, before the divorce trials of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon in the 1530s, a rich and complex network of dynastic, economic, and political alliances existed between medieval England and the Iberian kingdoms. The marriages of John of Gaunt’s two daughters to the Castilian and Portuguese kings created a legacy of Anglo-Iberian cultural exchange ii that is evident in the literature and manuscript culture of both England and Iberia. Because England, Castile, and Portugal all saw the rise of new dynastic lines at the end of the fourteenth century, the subsequent literature produced at their courts is preoccupied with issues of genealogy, just rule, and political consent. Dynastic foundation narratives compensate for the uncertainties of succession by evoking the longue durée of national histories—of Trojan diaspora narratives, of Roman rule, of apostolic foundation—and situating them within universalizing historical modes.
  • George Bernard Shaw in Context Edited by Brad Kent Frontmatter More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-04745-7 - George Bernard Shaw in Context Edited by Brad Kent Frontmatter More information GEORGE BERNARD SHAW IN CONTEXT When Shaw died in 1950, the world lost one of its most well-known authors, a revolutionary who was as renowned for his personality as he was for his humour, humanity, and rebellious thinking. He remains a compelling figure who deserves attention not only for how influential he was in his time but also for how relevant he is to ours. This collection sets Shaw’s life and achievements in context, with forty-two chapters devoted to subjects that interested him and defined his work. Contributors explore a wide range of themes, moving from factors that were formative in Shaw’s life, to the artistic work that made him most famous and the institutions with which he worked, to the political and social issues that consumed much of his attention, and, finally, to his influence and reception. Presenting fresh material and arguments, this collection will point to new direc- tions of research for future scholars. brad kent is Associate Professor of British and Irish Literatures at Université Laval and was Visiting Professor at Trinity College Dublin in 2013–14. His recent publications include a critical edition of Shaw’s Mrs Warren’s Profession (2012), The Selected Essays of Sean O’Faolain (forthcoming), and essays in University of Toronto Quarterly, Modern Drama, ARIEL: A Review of International English Literatures, English Literature in Transition, Irish University Review, and The Oxford Handbook of Modern Irish Theatre. He is also the programme director of the Shaw Symposium, held annually at the Shaw Festival in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Canada.
  • Catherine of Braganza and Catholic Books in Late Seventeenth-Century London

    Catherine of Braganza and Catholic Books in Late Seventeenth-Century London

    chapter 11 Royal Patronage of Illicit Print: Catherine of Braganza and Catholic Books in Late Seventeenth-Century London Chelsea Reutcke In 1662, the English Parliament passed An Act for preventing the frequent Abuses in printing.1 Among its many provisions, the act prohibited the print- ing or importation of any texts opposed to the Church of England, including books with Catholic content. Proscribed works were confiscated and either destroyed or ‘damasked’ (i.e., over-printed) for waste paper, while the printers and booksellers faced fines, confiscation of equipment and imprisonment.2 That same year, Catherine of Braganza, newly arrived in London, appointed Theodore Sadler as her bookseller-in-ordinary, instructing him to procure for her a list of Catholic devotional books.3 He submitted receipts to the excheq- uer for seven Roman breviaries, two psalters of Beata Maria hymns, a Roman missal, fifty ‘bookes for a night hearing of mass’ and an Iberian rubric.4 Even more books arrived from France.5 These orders served to set up Catherine’s Catholic chapel, which had been promised to her in her marriage contract to Charles II.6 Together with books ordered by Henrietta Maria, the Queen Mother, a significant number of Catholic books entered into these sanctioned Catholic spaces of London.7 1 ‘Charles II, 1662: An Act for preventing the frequent Abuses in printing seditious treasonable and unlicensed Bookes and Pamphlets and for regulating of Printing and Printing Presses’, in John Raithby (ed.), Statutes of the Realm (11 vols., s.l.: Great Britain Record Commission, 1819), V. 428–435. Hereafter 14 Car.
  • The Jesuits and the Popish Plot

    The Jesuits and the Popish Plot

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1950 The Jesuits and the Popish Plot Robert Joseph Murphy Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Murphy, Robert Joseph, "The Jesuits and the Popish Plot" (1950). Master's Theses. 1177. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/1177 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1950 Robert Joseph Murphy THE JESUITS AND THE POPISH PLOT BY ROBERT J. MURPHY. S.d. A THESIS SUBMITTED II PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE or MAStER OF ARTS IN LOYOLA UNIVERSITY JULY 1950 VI't A AUCTORIS Robert Joseph Murphy was born in Chicago, Illinois, April 15. 1923. He received his elementary education at St. Mel School. Ohicago, Ill.,. graduating in June, 1937 • Ho attended St. Mel High School tor one year and St. Ignatius High School. Chicago, Ill., grQduat1ng in June. 1941. In August, 1941, he entered the Jesuit Novitiate of the Sacred Heart, Millord, Ohio, remaining there until August 1945. 'that same month he entered West Baden College, West Baden Springs, Indiana, and transtered his studies in the Department of History to Loyola University, Ohicago, Ill. He received hi. Bachelor ot Arts degree in June, 1946, and began his graduate studies at Loyola in September 1946.