Five Years of Vegetation Monitoring at Grass Lake Research Natural Area. Shana Gross*1, Wes Christensen2, Stuart Osbrack1 email: *[email protected] 1Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, USDA Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 2Department of Geology, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Background Methods

Grass Lake was designated as a “Research Natural Area” by Long term vegetation monitoring (2004/2005 & 2009) the Forest Service to preserve a representative Sphagnum 1) 3 Trend transect R5 range monitoring plots. Sawed off snowshoes type in the Northern Sierra Nevada physiographic 2) 5 photo point areas each with 5-6 photographs during monitoring 3) Sphagnum spp. and triquetra cover monitoring protects resources province of Pacific Southwest Region. and improves safety –Data presented here: Grass Lake is the largest and best example of a Sphagnum • Surveyed transects throughout Grass Lake “bog” () in California. • GPS points and cover were recorded every 13 meters when species were present TRPA considers Grass Lake under Vegetation Threshold V2 • Braun-Blanquet cover classes were used for analysis – Uncommon communities. Geostatistical Analysis (preserves spatial trends): Hydrologic change is predicted to be the largest threat to this • ArcMap 9.3 Geostatistical Analyst community, climate change may exaggerate the response. • Ordinary Kriging using spherical variogram models Meesia triquetra • Anisotropy angle 90-100 degrees (approximately E-W) Sphagnum spp. (Peat ) and Meesia triquetra (3-ranked • E-W range ~200 m (major) N-S range ~90 m (minor) hump moss) are considered fen indicator species. Both of Figure 1: Location of Grass Lake • Lag size 10 meters these genera are dominant components of Grass Lake. Research Natural Area, CA • Number of lags 12 Sphagnum sp. Results: Meesia triquetra (3-ranked hump moss)

Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 (right): Cover (right): Cover (right): Acres % of Meesia of Meesia Change in Declining 78.734.3 triquetra in triquetra in geostatistical No change 137.459.8 2004/2005 2009 interpolations Increasing 13.5 5.9 (points). (points). of Meesia Polygons are Polygons are triquetra geostatistical geostatistical cover from interpolation interpolation 2004/2005 to of cover. of cover. 2009 (2004/2005 subtracted from 2009)

Results: Sphagnum spp. (Peat moss) – S. lescurii, Sphagnum sp.

Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure7 (right): Cover (right): Cover (right): Acres % of Sphagnum of Sphagnum Change in Declining 73.6 32.0 spp. in spp. in 2009 geostatistical No change 106.7 46.4 2004/2005 (points). interpolations Increasing 49.9 21.7 (points). Polygons are of Sphagnum Polygons are geostatistical spp. cover geostatistical interpolation from interpolation of cover. 2004/2005 to of cover. 2009 (2004/2005 subtracted from 2009)

Hydrological Variability Discussion Meesia triquetra •Decline in cover and area of Meesia •Total area decline of 34% at Grass Lake and Sphagnum may be hydrologically •Majority of decline was between 1-25% cover influenced. •Observed increase occurred in area monitored in 2004 •The high storage capacity of the west end, may explain the increase of Sphagnum spp. Meesia cover in wetter years. •Total area decline of 32% at Grass Lake •The response rate is unknown. •Majority of decline was between 5-25% cover Based on these data, change was Figure 9:Snotel Site 463 – Echo Peak, observed in 5 years. Accumulated precipitation 2000:2009 Hydrological variability water year •Monitoring in 2010 may address •2004 and 2009 were dry years, 2005 was a wet year response rate. It is hypothesized that Figure 8: USGS Hydrograph from Upper Truckee •2009 late season rain event cover will increase in 2010 based on River, 2000:2009 •Peak discharge/base flow comparable in 2004 & 2009 current above average snow pack. •2005 peak discharge and base flow higher in 2005 Acknowledgements Funding We would like to acknowledge all the field staff who helped collect data: Beth Brenneman, Jody Fraser, Alison Stanton, Katie Heard, Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act funding has supported this project through NEPA resource Cristina McKernan, Erik Frenzel, Emily Millar inventories, surveys, and analysis.