Noseweek Stink About Interwaste Moves South Too Rich to Pay Rates?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
R4680 NEWS YOU’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW (inc VAT) nosISSUE 231 JANUARY 2019eweek Rogue doctor preys on elderly women Pauw’s Twitter war with Noseweek Stink about Interwaste moves south Too rich to pay rates? ISSUE 231 • JANURARY 2019 Your favourite magazine is now Jacques Pauw available on your iPad takes on Noseweek and PC in a Twitter war. Page 4 4 Twitter FEATURES 6 Letters 7 Rogues and hacks Recently leaked emails shed new light on SARS 26 From another rogue unit and it’s allies. country 12 Struck-off GP finds new way to exploit elderly 28 Not Rocket Doctor guilty of unprofessional conduct ‘mentors’ Science woman, 82, as profitable alternative speciality. AVAILABLE ON YOUR 29 Letter from 16 Senior magistrate’s bigoted songsheet TABLET Umjindi Court officer Ashin Singh sows discord among his peers. 30 Last Word 19 A stink about a stink 31 Smalls Environmental offender now given green light Download your in Western Cape. digital edition today 20 Xolobeni: An assault by the state The Amadiba battle with miners and Sanral BOTH SINGLE ISSUES AND reaches a pitch. SUBSCRIPTIONS AVAILABLE! 22 Changing the game Wits student Kamal Ramburuth-Hurt is driving PLUS never miss a copy – a campaign to revolutionise the ‘irrelevant’ with back issues available to economics curriculum. download and store 25 Too rich to pay rates Property rates crusader strikes at purse of DOWNLOAD YOUR DIGITAL Joburg’s ultra rich and powerful. EDITION AT www.noseweek.co.za or 021 686 0570 3 Twitter Twitter war about SARS – rogue or right? T ALL BEGAN WITH TWO TWEETS THAT Welz: It’s not clear at all. City said the allegations were ‘false, malicious, Noseweek Editor Martin Welz posted Press’s [later] story headlined “R52m spurious & defamatory’. Pauw said to announce the arrival of the maga- tender trips up Malema”, naming the Motale was ‘discredited’ and had ‘used zine’s December issue. Then Jacques Ratananga Trust and dated 2012- planted information’.” Pauw,I one of the journalists mentioned 09-23, lists its authors as “Adriaan Max du Preez: Geez, Martin Welz, in the punted Noseweek article, immedi- Basson, Jacques Pauw & Athandiwe what’s your agenda here? This is bizarre ately responded on Twitter, launching a Saba”. I am similarly dumbfounded by and disappointing twitter war (twar) that had thousands of Pauw’s desperate attacks on myself & Welz: Hi Max, have you ever paused to tweeps on the edge of their seats: #Noseweek ponder what Jacques’s agenda might be Adriaan Basson did win the 2012 CNN in his outrageous attacks on myself and Welz: “As top #SARS officials face award as African Newspaper Journalist #Noseweek? charges, #Noseweek takes another of the Year “for a series of stories on Pauw: The irony is that Welz and I were look at the secret world of Johann van Julius Malema”. A footnote to an open good friends until April this year. He Loggerenberg (JvL) and his friends in letter Basson wrote to Tom Moyane knows very well that neither Gordhan the media – a world of intrigue and published in Fin24 in March 2016 nor Pillay nor anyone else had written subterfuge that is generally, but not confirms it in greater detail. [Also see my book. Why has he now repeated the always, in a good cause http://bit.ly/ CNN website.] Jealous? discredited Steve Motale’s allegations for SpooksGalore” and There was no need to have asked for the second time? “When Muzi Sikhakhane SC was your comments: they were on record. Welz: #Noseweek never said Gordhan appointed to investigate allegations Noseweek (in nose230) quoted them: had written Pauw’s book. We quoted involving top SARS investigator Johann “Gordhan denied playing any role in Motale (quoting his “impeccable sources”) van Loggerenberg, he soon realised he Pauw’s book.” “VanLoggerenberg’s lawyer saying that Pauw was “approached with was dealing with veteran spooks not tons of information by an influential slow to trot out testimony that was ‘self- group led by Gordhan”. He certainly got serving, false and irrelevant’.” tons of info. Pauw: Why does one journalist try to Pauw: Lamentable journalism. expose the sources of another? Jealousy? Impossible that Johann van Another Noseweek story riddled with Loggerenberg could have been an mistakes. No, I didn’t expose [Julius] apartheid spy. In 1990, when ANC was Malema’s trust with Adriaan Basson. unbanned, he was only 19 or 20 years It was Piet Rampedi. And no, he didn’t old! Even the questionable Sikhakhane win the CNN award. And no, [Pravin] report found he was an organised crime Gordhan did not write my book. And policeman. No word of being a spy. Why no.... do this? “Lucy Lastic” : Well, Marty lad? How Welz: The facts: #VanLoggerenberg plead you? told Sikhakhane he was an “undercover Welz: Not guilty on all counts, Milady. agent of the SAP” in apartheid years, Read the Noseweek story then check later a member of “what was known as Jacques’s criticisms. None stand up. The the Republican Spy Programme”. RSP real question is: why the hysteria? Am was “used in a political context”, but he’d I to be damned a heretic if I say Van focused “mostly” on crime investigations. Loggerenberg was no saint – although A spy by any other name… I do thank him and Gordhan for finally How can Sikhakhane be labelled nailing Zuma? “questionable”? After all, he was Pauw: Just to make it clear: the appointed to the commission by Ivan [earlier] Ratanang story was written by Pillay, Johann van Loggerenberg’s Adriaan Basson and Piet Rampedi. I am closest colleague (and his co-accused dumbfounded by Noseweek’s continuous in the current case). Maybe because attack on Van Loggerenberg. They didn’t Sikhakhane honestly found facts you bother to ask either JvL nor me or Jacques Pauw would rather not be confronted with? Basson for comment. “Real Louis Lood”: Young spies do exist 4 Twitter Twitter war about SARS – rogue or right? “Man on the street”: If his age did not interest, a decade ago, to have exposed Real Louis Lood: [UCT Prof] Pierre prevent him from being a policeman, why Zuma for the same; instead his de Vos is of the wrong opinion that the would it stop him from being a spy? “VIP” tax file was kept locked in Van SARS rogue unit did not commit any @tybophelo: If it walks, talks and Loggerenberg’s safe... until the Guptas crimes and uses a strawman argument quacks like a spy – it [probably] is a spy came knocking at Gordhan, Pillay and by referring to s3 of National Strategic Sandy Shadwell: I think that the only Van Loggerenberg’s door Intelligence Act (that is not applicable to people that will benefit from this spat Bart Henderson: Martin, did KPMG SARS Rogue Unit) and says it creates between @MaxduPreez and @Martin_ not distance themselves from the report? no offence. True. But SARS is a creature Welz will be the baddies Are there different reports? of STATUTE. It does not have power to Max du Preez: No, I have no part in Welz: No, #KPMG affirmed the body of create units like that. (No empowering this. I merely expressed surprise at the their #SARS “rogue unit” report and the legislation). UCT can also not create such unpleasantness. This is between Welz facts contained in it as correct; they only unit – no empowering legislation. and Pauw disowned the findings and conclusions Unit was unlawfully created. “Politi Oke”: I thought they both were section at the end of it. Inconvenient truths: If rogue unit was on the same side in the war vs state More… unlawfully created, its members may capture and corrupt activities in general. Welz: #VanLoggerenberg was member be members of unlawful enterprise as Welz: We are when it comes to state of Republican Spy Programme until defined in POCA. It may be racketeering capture and corruption – in general. It’s 1994 (when he was 24); then “noticed” if they commit crimes i.t.o Rica. the particulars that sometimes get in the by Pillay when the latter was put in Hawks can investigate Pravin.Sorry, way of the truth. charge of amalgamating old intelligence but that’s the inconvenient truth. Why “Uhuru”: I think I read somewhere agencies with ANC/MK ones. He was am I against this method of operation? in the KPMG report, Johann van recruited for SARS’s new spy unit. Only Fascism. Loggerenberg admitting that he fed question is: was it rogue? You cannot use unlawful means to information to @Jaqqs “Lungie”: Martin you’re onto something investigate taxpayers. Welz: Yes. And emails between them here. The problem is that you are And they acted as if above the law. were included in the report. going to have the whole army trying SARS have no right to bug phones and Wele Segalo: When JZ spoke about to discredit you. There is a tendency of follow vehicles electronically without spies, I thought he watched too many closing ranks. a warrant which they clearly did not James Bond movies... Welz: I’m confident I’ve enough have. This method of operation was What you say here, plus Nene’s media colleagues who are trained to ADMITTED by Van Loggerenberg. testimony at Zondo Commission, a lot accommodate a difference of opinion. I They were fascists. Who will watch the adds up... even live with the possibility guards? n We have been lied to over and over and that I might have got a few over again... things wrong, now and in Welz: We were lied to by all sides.