Of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print Version

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

2016 WIP PDL, "Formal" Legal Current Notes: yellow Greenfield, LCA Capacity - Natural Constraints Comments from Owners/Agent Overcoming Previous Hierarchy Conformity with Site Identified Site Size Site Current Adj Land Parcel Public Rights Flooding Surface Water Archaeological Comments from Residential Under Overcoming Overcoming shading LP Ref RLA Ref Site Name Other names Settlement Ward 2015 Site Owner Site Agent Developer Mixed parcel level if Site Access Features Gradient Historic Assets Contamination (ransom strips, (taken from Cfs form, lengthy supporting statements Application No. Progress Constraints Conclusions Removed Reason Ref No. Status Spatial Strategy Via (ha) Use(s) Use(s) Ref of Way (Flood Zone) Drainage Assets Owners/Agents continued Planning Construction Constraints 1 Constraints 2 indicates info Greenfield/Bro available (TPOs, LNR access rights may be summarised) free text Capacity Suitability 2021-2026

Status Availability has been year supply supply year wnfield etc.) etc.) Achievability updated Site DevelopableSite In Year Site Deliverable Not within 5 within Deliverable Not Site Current Year 2015-2016 Year Current 1 2016-2017 Year 2 2017-2018 Year 3 2018-2019 Year 4 2019-2020 Year 5 2020-2021 Year 2016-2021 1-5 Years Total 2026-2031 Years In 2031-2033 Years In 2033 Post ALPH525 N/A N/A Sycamore N/A Alphamstone Stour Valley Countryside Yes Call for Sites Mr Robin N/A N/A 0.5 Residential (1 Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A2) Existing None None 1/35 from West Low Probability To existing None None None None Additional much needed housing in the Village None None N/A 7 Y Y Y Site in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Backland REMOVED, Cottage, Goulds South Williams house) sensitivity to (Hedgerow to to East (Zone 1) sufficiently large development backland dev. Road change) front) nucleated in area with Hierarchy status hamlet for linear form countryside; RLP16 to apply located in but back land Alphamstone APLH101 N/A N/A Joss Cottage, N/A Alphamstone Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr John N/A N/A 1.6 Residential (1 Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A2) Existing None None Slight Low Probability To existing None None None None Two acres available as part of current garden field. None None N/A 4 Y Y Y Site is below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED, Goulds Road South Cannings house) sensitivity to (Zone 1) threshold for threshold below threshold change) SHLAA, and is in an isolated countryside ASHE102 ASH1 N/A Site fronting N/A Ashen Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs Mr David N/A 0.4 Agricultural Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) From Foxes None None Slight slope Low Probability Soakaways None None None None It must be remembered that the function of the Planning Site is adjacent to the None None N/A N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Foxes Road North Village Robert Smith Land and high sensitivity Road (Zone 1) system is to provide a degree of choice as to where people development boundary and boundary included in Chapman countryside to change) wish to live. The current policy has put pressure on house inclusion would be considered amendment current strategy prices and if allowed to continue, will further restrict and as a natural rounding off of the would be could be "Squeeze out" local people who wish to live locally. In boundary. required considered addition, this situation has been aggravated by the continuing under new Local growth and expansion relating to Stanstead Airport. Ashen is Plan such a village where further controlled residential development should be allowed and we refer to previous representations requesting that the village envelope should be altered to include an allocation for residential development on this site.

ASHE103 ASH2 N/A South of Foxes N/A Ashen Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Stephen Mrs Clare N/A 0.98 Agricultural Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) From Upper None TPO 3/97 - T1 Relatively Flat Low Probability SUDS None None None None The site has an absence of any physical constraints, and None None N/A 18 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Lane North Village Norris Hutchinson Land and high sensitivity Farm NW Boundary (Zone 1) could be considered suitable for development recognising that boundary included in countryside to change) Road/Foxes both sides of the site abut the existing village boundary. amendment current strategy Lane/Clare Rd would be could be required considered under new Local ASHE104 ASH3/5 N/A Land to the N/A Ashen Stour Valley Adjacent Other Yes Site Allocations Mr Nigel Mr Paul N/A 0.45 Garden land, Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (A2/B4) Existing PROW 59_21 None Flat Low Probability Soakaways Adj None None None Site was included in the Site Allocations and Development Pre-submission 15/00888/FUL No Pending 2 Y Y Y Site below 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED, west of Street North Village and McCrea Munson concrete and high sensitivity southern (Zone 1) conservation Management Plan which the Council considers a material allocation Consideration threshold. threshold Below Farm Development foundation of countryside to boundary area and Grade consideration for the determination of planning applications. without Threshold Management commercial change/Relative II/II* listed permission Plan chicken shed. ly high buildings sensitivity to ASHE500 N/A N/A Land rear of N/A Ashen Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Timothy N/A N/A 0.54 Fallow Land Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) Existing None None Slopes down to Low Probability Soakaways None None None None The area of land in question is currently agricultural. If None N/A No N/A 30 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A New North Village Edwards and high sensitivity north (Zone 1) included in this scheme and with positive feedback from boundary included in Bungalows, The countryside to change) Braintree DC agreeing to change of use to land for amendment current strategy Street appropriate development I and my neighbours would not would be could be hesitate in allowing it to become available for immediate use required considered under new Local Plan

BELO105 BLO1 N/A Land north of N/A Belchamp Otten Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Frederick N/A N/A 0.8 Arable Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) From The Street PROW 61_12 None Flat Low Probability To existing None None None None More affordable housing is needed to enable younger people None N/A No N/A 15 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A The Street North Village Branwhite and high sensitivity NE boundary (Zone 1) and those on lower incomes to live in the village. This would boundary included in countryside to change) ensure the survival of the local village school and other amendment current strategy facilities currently available to residents in the area. A mixture would be could be of smaller house alongside the existing larger houses in the required considered village would be excellent for the social cohesion of the under new Local village. The site is in the centre of a friendly village community Plan and has road frontage. It has nearby access to primary schools, pubs and a community centre, as well as being on a bus route for local primary and secondary schools. There is also a bus service to Sudbury

BELO106 BLO4 N/A Land adj N/A Belchamp Otten Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Frederick N/A N/A 0.25 Arable Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) From The Street None None Flat Low Probability Ditch and land Adjacent None None None This site is next to an existing bungalow which is one of only None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Branfields, The North Village Branwhite and high sensitivity (Zone 1) drains conservation three in the village. A bungalow on this site would not be at all boundary threshold. threshold below threshold Street countryside to change) area intrusive to the existing surrounding buildings, and would amendment provide a more suitable balance of housing options would be required

BELO107 BLO5 N/A Land to the east N/A Belchamp Otten Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Frederick N/A N/A 0.3 Derelict Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) The Street or None None Flat Low Probability Existing Conservation None None None This site is unsuitable for the agricultural use it had in the None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED of junction of North Village Branwhite piggery/poultry and high sensitivity Puttock End (Zone 1) Area past. It would provide an ideal site for a residential dwelling boundary threshold. threshold below threshold The Street & shed and countryside to change) built sympathetically to blend in with other listed dwellings. amendment Road to Puttock concrete Lack of mains sewerage has not provided to be a problem would be End hardstanding with other recent developments or all the other older required properties in the village and as the owner of the surrounding land any issues can be dealt with.

BELP108 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Belchamp St Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr D Mr Barry N/A 2.5 Cultivated field, Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (B4) Existing field FP19/PROW Adj TPO Area Slight fall Low probability Adj None None Allotment on Allotment on annually renewal agreement. Currently in None N/A No N/A 50 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Vicarage Road Paul North Village Middleditch Whymark, Agricultural, and residential sensitivity to access from 62_19 along 10/83 - A1. towards road (Zone 1) conservation annually cultivated rotation available from 2016. Close to village boundary included in Whymark small single change) Vicarage Road western area, Grade II renewable centre and amenities, school, village hall, pub, church and amendment current strategy Moulton Ltd allotment boundary listed building agreement public transport links. Two bus routes pass the site frontage. would be could be opposite site. required considered under new Local Plan

BELP109 N/A N/A Land off Church N/A Belchamp St Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Unknown Mr John N/A 0.135 Garden Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B4) From Church None None Gentle slope Low Probability Existing None None None Charge on part of None None No N/A 8 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hierarchy status Street Paul North Newell high sensitivity Street (Zone 1) land by the included in countryside; to change) Church for current strategy located in group mineral rights. could be of dwellings Charge to be considered which does not removed. under new Local have a Plan development boundary

BLAN111 BLA1 N/A Hill House, N/A Black Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Henry None N/A 0.74 Garden Greenfield Countryside/A Medium - Low 1b Witham Road None None Low Probability Existing None None None Unknown None None None No N/A 5 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Larger extent Witham Road and Black Town Aldridge 120/Edge of (Zone 1) included in submitted in Cfs Notley Braintree current strategy could be considered under new Local Plan BLAN115 BLA11 N/A Land at Bakers Land at Row Nr Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Andrew Mr Mark 4 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/ed Medium 5a Existing for None None Flat Low Probability Existing None None None None The site extends to approximately 4 ha and is a green field N/A N/A No N/A 99 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (part) Lane and Green and Black Town Wilford, Bedding, Senior Land ge of Great agricultural (Zone 1) site, with tree planting and hedges along its boundaries. The included in London Road Notley Planning Planning Notley purposes site is located to the south east of Great Notley, between two current strategy Associate Manager main roads, London Road to the west and Bakers Lane to the could be southeast. Established residential development bounds the considered site to the north and west and small groups of dwellings and under new Local agricultural fields abut the eastern and south-eastern Plan boundaries. The site is therefore well contained and benefits from recognisable and permanent boundaries on all sites, making it a natural location for development.

BLAN116 BLA5/BLA1 N/A Land at Bakers Land at Great Nr Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No Site Allocations Mr Richard N/A 2.91 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/ed Medium 5a Bakers Lane, No None Flat Low Probability Existing None None None No The new Local Plan must ensure that the most sustainable N/A N/A No N/A 80 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A 1 Lane (Between Notley (south of and Black Town and Mabb Land ge of Great emergency/ped (Zone 1) options for development are achieved. Land at Bakers Lane included in London Road A120, north of Notley Development Notley estrian access represents a substantial opportunity site which has greater current strategy and Row Green) Dragnets Lane, Management from Bakers sustainability credentials than many of the other options being could be east of London Plan Lane possible presented. The site will provide a substantial boost to the considered Road, west of Districts supply of housing. under new Local Church Plan Road/Buck Hill)/ Land at Row Green

BLAN118 BLA3 N/A Rear of Brain N/A Black Notley Great Notley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr John Mr Andy N/A 0.6 Paddocks/Grazi Greenfield Countryside Medium 7b Via Brain Valley None None Slight gradient Low Probability TBC None None None Overage in favour The site is in a sustainable location adjacent to and close to None None No N/A 15 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Valley Avenue and Black Village Geraghty Butcher ng and residential Avenue (Zone 1) of previous owner the centre of Black Notley, within walking distance of the included in Notley village shop and regular bus routes linking to Braintree and current strategy beyond. Cressing railway station on the Braintree branch line could be is less than 1 km away from the site. considered under new Local Plan

BLAN119 N/A N/A Land opp. 65-96 N/A Black Notley Great Notley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr John Mr Andy N/A 6 Grazing Land Greenfield Countryside Medium 7b Via Brain Valley None TPO Flat Part of site TBC N/A None None Overage in favour This submission for Call for sites is intended to assist BDC in None None No No 45 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Includes Brain Valley and Black Village Geraghty Butcher and residential Avenue within Flood of previous owner the identification of a suitable small strategic site to inform the included in BLAN118 in Avenue Notley Zone 2/3 preparation of the new Local Plan. It sets out preliminary current strategy larger extent proposals for an extension to Black Notley and how it can be could be delivered. It will be subject to further assessment and considered discussions with key stakeholders as the process evolves. under new Local Plan

BLAN120 N/A N/A Troys Farm, N/A Black Notley Great Notley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr and Mrs Mr Alan N/A 1.83 House and Previously Countryside, Urban/Medium Urban/7b Access from None None Slight gradients Low probability None Adj SMR 6505 None None The sites at Troys Farm are either all wihtin one ownership or None N/A No N/A 50 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Includes Black Notley and Black Village Coulson Wipperman, gardens and Developed Land residential, The Street to front/rear. (Zone 1) archaeological could be adjusted to be, and involve only one other owner, boundary included in BLAN122 in (Phase 1) Notley Alan farm buildings and Greenfield public house Mainly level. significance not whose land can be left out, and so are readily developable. amendment current strategy larger extent Wipperman with small field known The sites include and/or adjoin the existing village built up would be could be and Co. adjoining area boundary and would not intrude into open countryside, required considered being part previously developed as well as greenfield land. under new Local The location is a sustainable one with village services and Plan bus services readily available and would consolidate and follow the existing linear village form and boundaries of Black notley. Additional "other village" deevlopment is also required to meet local and objectively assessed housing needs and also to maintain village services and the local social infrastructure. Theses site can meet this local requirement.

BLAN121 N/A N/A Troys Farm, N/A Black Notley Great Notley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr and Mrs Mr Alan N/A 0.25 House and Previously Countryside N/A Urban Access from None None Slight gradients Low probability None Adj SMR 6505 None None As above. None N/A No N/A 11 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Black Notley and Black Village Coulson Wipperman, gardens Developed Land and residential The Street via to front/rear. (Zone 1) archaeological boundary included in (Phase 2) Notley Alan and Greenfield Troys Farm Mainly level. significance not amendment current strategy Wipperman entrance known would be could be and Co. required considered under new Local Plan BLAN122 N/A N/A Troys Farm, N/A Black Notley Great Notley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr and Mrs Mr Alan N/A 0.275 House and Previously Countryside N/A Urban Access from None None Slight Low probability None None None None As above. None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Black Notley and Black Village Coulson Wipperman, gardens and Developed Land and residential The Street gradient/level (Zone 1) boundary included in Notley Alan farm buildings and Greenfield amendment current strategy Wipperman and field would be could be and Co. required considered under new Local Plan

Page 1 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

GNBN261 BLA14 N/A Land adj to 119 N/A Black Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No Site Allocations Mr G Went N/A N/A 0.1376 Disused garden Greenfield Residential N/A N/A London Road None TPOs/Group Slight None TBC None None Unknown None The land lies adjacent to established linear and deeper None None No N/A 2 Y Y N Development Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED London Road and Black Town and TPO's residential development close to facilities. The residential boundary threshold threshold below threshold Notley Development development is the natural extension of the group lying amendment Management between residential units, but if designed well could have a would be Plan less intrusive in the street scene due to the ability to maintain required the frontage planting in a similar fashion to the pattern in the northern part of London Road.

WETH416 WET3 part/ N/A Land at Owls N/A Blackmore End Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Craig N/A N/A 1.1 Meadow/agricult Previously Countryside (Moderate to (B9) Existing FP13/PROW None Level Low Probability Into Adj Grade II None None None The boundary has been drawn so tightly it allows virtually no None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A WET7X Hall Farm Village Finbow, MD, ural use/dwelling Developed Land and residential high sensitivity 117_13 adj (Zone 1) watercourses Listed buildings opportunity for infill development of any form. This stance boundary included in Owls Hall Farm and Greenfield to change) western seems overly protective and gives no scope whatsoever for amendment current strategy boundary, any additional development which might make the village more would be could be Byway sustainable. required considered 15/PROW In the case of Blackmore End, we feel both envelopes should under new Local 117_15 be adjoined and extended to include the open land between Plan Bronte Cottages and Syers Field. Such additions would give modest scope for a variety of infill possibilities which would all be within the main layout of the village and would not alter its nature or character yet could create some attractive new buildings which may help to sustain the present community. WETH417 N/A N/A Courtenham, N/A Blackmore End Three Fields Countryside No Call for Sites Mr J Courtauld Mr D N/A 0.329 Storage/Disass Previously Countryside (Moderate to (B9/F1) Existing None None Flat Low probability None None None None Current use needs to relocate. All around it there are clearly None N/A No N/A 6 Y N Y Current use Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Four Ashes, Pocknell, embly Developed Land high sensitivity vehicular (Zone 1) domestic developments. 98/00531/OUT Refused at appeal – needs to included in Blackmore End Pocknell to change / access Residential development 25 dwellings relocate current strategy, Studio Relatively high PDL, could be sensitivity to considered WETH415 WET8X N/A The Bull, Daisy N/A Blackmore End Three Fields Other Village Yes/No Site Allocations Mr Craig N/A N/A 1 Residential Previously Countryside (Moderate to (B9) Existing FP40/PROW None Level Low Probability Into Various Grade II Archaeological None None Such additions would give modest scope for a variety of infill Pre-submission N/A No N/A 4 Y Y Y Dev boundary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Cottage, The (Barbary Green) and Finbow, MD, Developed Land and residential high sensitivity 117_40 adj (Zone 1) watercourses Listed buildings significance not possibilities which would all be within the main layout of the allocation of included in threshold below threshold Smithy, Barbery Development Owls Hall Farm and Greenfield to change) western known adj village and would not alter its nature or character yet could development ADMP Green, Mill Management boundary SMR6877 create some attractive new buildings which may help to boundary House, Plan sustain the present community. Blackmore

BOCN129 BON8 N/A Unit 1 N/A Bocking Bocking North Adjacent Main No Site Allocations Mr Gordon N/A N/A 0.9 B2 and B8 Previously Countryside N/A N/A Bovingdon None None Flat Flood Zone 2 Existing None None Yes None Unit 1 has not employed or been in use since 1990 when Employment use N/A No N/A 10 N Y N Whole site 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes All of site REMOVED all Bovingdon Town and Fulcher Developed Land and residential Road and 3 destroyed by fire. Bathhouse has not been in use since 2001 within flood within Flood of site within Road and Development and is derelict. I have had the site on the market with two zone which Zone 2 and 3 Flood Zone 2/3 Bakehouse Management local agents for some 20+years with no results except offers would make it Plan for car breakers and scrap yard. I feel that the site has difficult to outlived it employment use. Other sites have been developed develop for nearby i.e. Chanty & Bovingdon Motors. Flooding has not residential uses. been an issue since the new housing between the river and our boundary have been built.

BOCN124 BON16 N/A Land rear of 61 N/A Bocking, Bocking North Adjacent Main No Site Allocations Mr & Mrs N/A N/A 1.31 Dwelling, Previously Countryside Low 14d London Road FP31/PROW TPO Group Falls towards Low probability None None Historical early None It is proposed that the layout design of the site will provide a None N/A No N/A 25 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Broad Road, Braintree Town and Sarling Stables, Developed Land and residential 68_31 adj 16/2011 - G1/2 the west on the (Zone 1) 20th century total of 25 dwellings for people who wish to downsize and free boundary included in Bocking Development Workshop, and Greenfield western adj access western part of inert landfill in up larger family housing elsewhere in the district, and 1st time amendment current strategy Management Barn, Garage, boundary, the site western part of buyer properties. It is considered that bungalows should be would be could be Plan land shaped FP30/PRWO the site built so that existing residents currently overlooking the area required considered riding area and 68_30 along will retain their open aspects and views. It is felt the type of under new Local rough grassland access and properties proposed will not attract people who would have Plan north-eastern numerous cars and therefore the additional traffic onto Broad boundary Road will be limited.

BOCN133 BON17 N/A Land at N/A Bocking, Bocking North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mc Donnell Mr Mark Persimmon 9.45 Greenfield/maint Greenfield Countryside, Low 13f Access from FP27/PROW None Field 1 gradual Majority Low Adj Grade II None Part within None Site is estimated to provide between 75 to100 dwellings per None N/A No N/A 240 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smaller area Deanery Hill, Braintree Town Mohan Ltd Jackson, Homes ained but not care home, Deanery Hill 68_27 eastern south to north probability listed Old 250m historic annum. Site can come forward immediately and has no boundary included in submitted under Bocking Mark Jackson farmland residential boundary, and west to (Zone 1), Flood Deanery landfill buffer. ownership constraints. amendment current strategy BON17 Planning FP/PROW east. Field 2 Zone 2/3 would be could be 68_26 crosses gradual gradient northern end required considered BORL403 N/A N/A Borley Hall Field N/A Borley Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Julian N/A N/A 2 Grazing Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A2) Private Road FP19 northern No Flat Part of site Existing None None None None None None N/A N/A N/A 50 Y Y Y FRA would be Gas pipe line Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A south of Borley North Manyon sensitivity to boundary/FP15 within Flood required buffer zone included in Hall change) NE Zone 2/3 would current strategy corner/PROW significantly limit could be 65_15 development considered area. under new Local Plan BORL404 N/A N/A Land NW of N/A Borley Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Julian N/A N/A 0.4 Grazing Greenfield Countryside/sp (Relatively high (A2) Private Road FP16/PROW Local Wildlife Flat Low Probability No None Archaeological None None None None N/A N/A N/A 5 N Y Y Local Wildlife Site is a local 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Local Wildlife REMOVED Borley Hall North Manyon oradic sensitivity to 65_16 crosses Site - Borley Mill (Zone 1) significance not Site designation wildlife site Site Local Wildlife buildings to change) site/FP17/PRO Meadow known would need to which would Site north W 65_17 adj W SMR8528. be removed make boundary development difficult BRAD142 N/A N/A Land east of N/A Bradwell Coggeshall Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Bradwell Mr David N/A 7 Agricultural Greenfield Residential/Co N/A N/A Church Road PROW adjacent None Gently slopes Low Probability Existing None None None Unknown As significant landowners in Bradwell , the Trustees of the None None None No None 20 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Playing field and Village Estates Fletcher, untryside to site down to river (Zone 1) Bradwell Estate are keen to explore the potential benefits that included in Allotment Associate the site could offer for the local community. The quantum of current strategy Gardens, Planner, Strutt development and the location of residential development on could be Church Lane. & Parker LLP the site is flexible here to meet BDC housing need. The size considered of proposed site offers a number of opportunities for under new Local community benefits/increase in the are of public open space Plan and this is something that we would be keen to discuss further with the Council and parish council in due course.

BRAD143 N/A N/A Land adj The N/A Bradwell Coggeshall Adjacent Other No Call for Sites McDonnell Mr Mark N/A 0.06 Gap between Greenfield Residential N/A N/A A120 None None Sloping south to Low Probability Existing None Adj None Unknown None None No None 1 Y Y Y Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Chaldercoot and Village Mohan ltd Jackson, dwellings north (Zone 1) Archaeological threshold threshold below threshold Alanvye, Mark Jackson road SMR-8646 Coggeshall Planning Road BRAD503 N/A N/A Rectory N/A Bradwell Coggeshall Adjacent Other No Call for Sites McDonnell Mr Mark N/A 12.72 Commercial Previously Residential N/A N/A Coggeshall Footpath 37 and None Sloping south to Low Probability To be None Adj Yes - Landfill None None None None None 100 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Meadow Village Mohan ltd Jackson, Garage/Fishing Developed Land and Road and 67 north from the (Zone 1) addressed Archaeological and other waste included in Mark Jackson lake and and Greenfield countryside Rectory centre of the through a future road SMR-8646 disposal current strategy Planning Agricultural, Meadow site and north to drainage could be telephone south from the strategy. considered masts. centre of the under new Local site. Plan N/A BOB16 UCS N/A N/A Garage and Braintree Bocking Main Town Yes Urban Capacity C.J. Eley & Co. P.J. + R.J N/A 0.28 Petrol filling Previously Residential in N/A Urban Access from No public None No Low Probability Not Known None identified Possibility that Previous (2010) comments: Not yet decided. Residential Without N/A No N/A 14 Y N Y Current use Removal of Review site in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Garage Courts, Blackwater Study Eley station and Developed Land John Ray St Coggeshall footpaths (Zone 1) on safeguarding garage courts at development could be one of several possible future uses for permission needs to storage tanks light of Cfs John Ray Street commercial and Turnpike Road and John through site maps. However the rear are the site. relocate and response from garage, garages Place, Diana Ray Street the current use needed for contamination main owner. to the rear. Golding Centre of the site existing residents. assessment in Turnpike suggests required. Active Place, unidentified businesses. commercial contamination uses in East may exist. St opposite

N/A BOB20SHL 589 N/A Garage Court at Braintree Bocking Main Town Yes Previous Chelmsford Car Smart N/A 0.1847 Former garage Previously Residential, N/A Urban Site access No public None No Low Probability Archaeological No identified Approved at 14/01116/FUL No Site clearance 14 Y Y Y Discharge of Approved 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in AA Falkland Court Blackwater Planning & Commercials Planning Ltd court cleared Developed Land residential from Edinburgh footpaths (Zone 1) significance not contamination committee 2006 planning subject to S106. Cfs Permission Ltd and alternative parking, and Gardens. (then through site known on site decision conditions parking Swiss Bell PH via Mountbatten SMR6511. (asbestos in pending s106 provided. Road or former garages Marlborough cleared with Road) demolition some time ago).

N/A BOB38SHL 592 N/A Former Health Braintree Bocking Main Town Yes Planning Bowergrange N/A Bowergrange 0.126 Disused Previously Amenity N/A Urban Access from No public TPOs near No Low Probability Grade 2 listed PER with full 11/00864/FUL Site cleared - 14 Y Y Y Site has Site has benefit 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in AA Centre, Blackwater Permission Estate Ltd. Estates Ltd building; former Developed Land space, Coggeshall footpaths boundary on (Zone 1) building planning planning of planning Cfs Coggeshall health clinic including Road through site adjoining land adjacent to site; permission permission permission Road skateboard within park; conservation residential area N/A BOB1/BOB3 693 N/A Tabor House Braintree Bocking Main Town Yes Urban Capacity Essex County N/A N/A 0.52 Offices and Previously Offices, retail, N/A Urban Existing Possible Rear of site is No Low Probability Conservation Not known None identified PER with full 14/00702/FUL Yes 19 under 35 Y Y Y Discharge of 20 units 0 19 0 16 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in 9 Blackwater Study Council associated Car Developed Land open space / driveway permissive adjacent to (Zone 1) area on site. planning construction planning approved Cfs Park park to East access from access right public park permission conditions subject to S106. Coggeshall through site designated Further potential Road informal open on former car space parking area

N/A N/A 715 157 Coggeshall N/A Braintree Bocking Main Town Yes Planning Mrs J N Davey Mr Alan Hill N/A 0.55 House and Previously Residential/Ca N/A Urban Coggeshall Adjacent and None Slight Low Probability Existing None Adj Coggeshall None Unknown N/A Per with outline 14/00670/OUT No None 13 Y Y Y Site has outline 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Road and Land Blackwater Permission Dced garden Developed Land re home Road highway to (Zone 1) Road planning planning Cfs, outline to Rear front. permission permission for permission for housing 14, 13 net capacity BOCN123 BON34X N/A Highfield Stile N/A Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No Site Allocations Mr Digby (+3 N/A N/A 1 Greenfield Greenfield Countryside Medium 15b Access from Bridleway 133 None Flat Low probability None Archaeological None None The delivery rate could be good as host services nearby None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (Small part of Road, Braintree Town and others) and residential Highfields Stile on northern (Zone 1) significance not boundary included in BON7/BON11) Development Farm boundary known SMR amendment current strategy Management 6513 would be could be Plan required considered under new Local Plan BOCN125 BON37Y N/A R/O 282/288 N/A Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Peter Stant Mr Mike N/A 5.8 Part nursery, Previously Countryside Medium - Low 12a Existing nursery FP33/PROW None Relatively flat Low probability To Broad Road None None None None Land is within two ownerships and would be sold for None N/A No N/A 30 Y N Y Current use Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Broad Road, Town French part residential Developed Land and residential access from 68_33 along (Zone 1) development. needs to boundary included in Braintree and Greenfield Broad Road access and relocate amendment current strategy, southern would be PDL, could be boundary required considered under new Local Plan

Page 2 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

Status Availability has been year supply supply year wnfield etc.) etc.) Achievability updated Site DevelopableSite In Year Site Deliverable Not within 5 within Deliverable Not Site Current Year 2015-2016 Year Current 1 2016-2017 Year 2 2017-2018 Year 3 2018-2019 Year 4 2019-2020 Year 5 2020-2021 Year 2016-2021 1-5 Years Total 2026-2031 Years In 2031-2033 Years In 2033 Post BOCN126 BON1 N/A Land east of Land at Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Messrs Nicholas Yes 25.5 Agricultural Greenfield Residential Low 14b Significant road PROW 68_29 Woodland TPO Site slopes from Low probabilty Listed buildings Subject to market conditions, around 40-45 market dwellings Excellent access onto the A131 None N/A No N/A 638 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smaller extent Dorewards Hall, Dorewards Hall Town Stevenson Harper, Land frontage onto along western 17/49 on Round north to the (Zone 1) at Dorewards would be completed per annum, depending on the number of roundabout at Broad Road amendment and included in submitted in Cfs Bocking Hawkspur Broad Road boundary Wood adj site. south Hall to the west house builders developing at any one time on site. The provides connectivity with development current strategy (the B1053) Numerous TPOs of the site and delivery of affordable housing will take place simultaneously nearby supermarkets, Freeport boundary would could be which will be on adj land at the windmill to alongside market dwellings. shopping and leisure facilities be required considered sufficient for Monken Hadley the north of the and the two railway stations at under new Local vehicular/cycle site. Residential development on the site provides a strategic level Braintree and Freeport (which Plan access for allocation for housing in Braintree for about 638 dwellings on provide frequent commuter residential a gross site area of about 25.5 ha shown edged red on the trains to and from London development. accompanying site plan. Liverpool Street (approx. 1 hour There is The landowners also own and control the adjoining land, farm journey). The wider road pedestrian/cycle buildings and farmhouse at Dorewards Hall which are shown network (A120 and A131) then access from the outlined in blue on the accompanying location plan. The blue provides good access to site and area amounts to about 66.2 ha. Colchester, Stansted Airport, adjoining owned Development of the site could potentially deliver associated Chelmsford, Witham and land onto community benefits such as for example open space, Halstead. Church St. children’s play equipment or sports facilities as part of a package of S.106 items and CIL contributions. There are several bus stops adjoining the site on Broad There is very good connectivity with existing nearby local Road and Church Street with facilities such as the two schools, college, sports grounds, buses to Colchester, Braintree village hall, surgery, shops, church and pubs with Town, Chelmsford, Witham, pedestrian/cycle access possible onto Church Street at Halstead and Sudbury. several points from the landowner’s land. Braintree town’s main facilities including retailers, restaurants, schools and The development layout and library are all within a short walk, cycle ride and bus/car siting will be planned journey. sensitively, along with structural landscaping and tree/shrub Excellent access onto the A131 roundabout at Broad Road planting undertaken as part of provides connectivity with nearby supermarkets, Freeport any development, in order to shopping and leisure facilities and the two railway stations at mitigate any visual impact from Braintree and Freeport (which provide frequent commuter the surrounding views including trains to and from London Liverpool Street (approx. 1 hour from the buildings at Dorewards journey). The wider road network (A120 and A131) then Hall, the windmill and Bocking provides good access to Colchester, Stansted Airport, Church Street. Chelmsford, Witham and Halstead.

There are several bus stops adjoining the site on Broad Road and Church Street with buses to Colchester, Braintree Town, Chelmsford, Witham, Halstead and Sudbury.

BOCN127 BON4 N/A Land off N/A Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Trustees of the Mr Andy N/A 0.48 Maintained Greenfield Residential/Co Medium - Low 15b Elizabeth PROW on None Slightly sloped Low Probability Existing Site outside Adj SMR_6513 None None It represents an entirely suitable opportunity for development None N/A N/A N/A 9 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Convent Lane Town Franciscan Butcher open land untryside Lockhart Way eastern (Zone 1) conservation for the following reasons:- boundary included in Covent boundary area listed amendment current strategy buildings at the • The site is in a sustainable location, adjacent to the existing would be could be Franciscan built up area, well served by public transport (see Q10) with required considered Convent to the frequent access to Braintree Town Centre, the town’s under new Local south west schools, leisure and community facilities and train station. Plan Local facilities of education, playing fields and public houses are within easy or reasonable walking or cycling distance.

• The identification of the site for development would accord with the existing spatial policy of the Core Strategy to concentrate development in the main towns.

• The site is adjacent to an existing recent housing development served by a new roadway designed to accommodate the development of this land with suitable dimensions and visibility to Broad Road• Drgs SC03 and SC04 show that the site is contained and partially screened by existing hedgerows to minimise impact on the countryside beyond the northern and western boundaries. These hedgerows could be strengthened by additional planting.

• Although adjacent to the Conservation Area and close to the Listed Buildings at the Convent to the south and east Drg SC03 demonstrates that, by careful design, including the provision of open space, any impact on these heritage assets would be minimal. The existing public right of way and footpath links to the east and west boundaries would be unaffected by development.

• The existing housing at Elizabeth Lockhart Way currently enjoy an open outlook over the site. As Drg SC03 demonstrates, by careful design and provision of open space, the impact on existing residential amenity can be minimised.

• Drg SC03 demonstrates that a modest development of around 9 houses can be comfortably accommodated on the site in accordance with BDC’s normal space, access and parking standards in a layout that would be in keeping with the density of surrounding development BOCN131 BON19 N/A Land at Former Landfill Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No SHLAA 2010 Mr Alex Tanner, Mr Clive Mr Alex Tanner, 4.1 Land under Previously Countryside, Low 13f Peter Taylor No public None No Part of site Unknown None None Site identified None None N/A No N/A 66 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Slightly smaller Bovingdon Site at Town George Tanner Tanner, George Tanner restoration Developed Land residential and Avenue and footpaths within Flood as being boundary included in extent submitted Road, Bocking Bovingdon (Shalford) Ltd Senior (Shalford) Ltd some industrial Bovingdon through site Zone 2/3 contaminated amendment current strategy in Cfs Road, Bocking Partner, use Road land. Under would be could be Hollins restoration. required considered Architects, under new Local Surveyors & Plan Planning Consultants BOCN132 BON7 N/A Land bounded Land at Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Crest Strategic Mr Bob Crest Strategic 65.6 Agricultural Previously Residential / Medium to High, 15d,15b, Primary access FP34, 35, 36 on Various TPO's No All development Combination of None Three Contamination None known The land to the east of Broad Road, Braintree (BON7, 9 and - the provision of a full range of None N/A No N/A 1000 Y N Y Spatial strategy Current use Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Larger extent by A131, Broad Highfield Stile Town Projects Sellwood, Projects Land / disused Developed Land Agricultural Medium, and 15e/c on to the A131 site ; Bridleway on land areas to be SUDS and archaeological possible within 11) was previously considered by your Members (LDF Panel, open space uses amendment and needs to included in submitted under Road and River Farm and Managing gravel pit / and Greenfield Medium to Low (further 133 crosses adjoining at 108 within Zone 1, controlled sites shown on the Straits Mill 6th February 2012) as a more modest release of land - local retail and community development relocate current strategy Cfs Blackwater, Straits Road, Director, employment junctions onto site. Broad Road; the area of discharge into safeguarding Industrial Estate adjacent to Broad Road. Members rejected this, but noted facilities boundary would could be Braintree Bocking Sellwood A131 would not Woodland TPOs Zones 2 and 3 the River details not / former quarry that the wider site had potential as a future strategic release - a new two form entry Primary be required considered Planning be permitted), 05/2014 W1 & next to the Blackwater. known. Potential in centre of site. with its primary access on to the A131. School (subject to capacity under new Local secondary W2 River along historic Convent lane Crest has had an Option over the major portion of the site for analysis) Plan access on to Blackwater will trackways. historic landfill some years, but this did not include the Straits Mill Industrial - closure of Convent Lane and Broad Road. be used as a site. Bte862- Estate and associated land to the south. Crest is now at an new access to Sewage Closure of Country Park. unknown infill. advanced stage in Option negotiations with the owners of the Treatment Works via a new vehicular Prbte6- landfills Straits Mill land and Heads of Terms are with Solicitors. As a A131 access. access from and other waste consequence, Crest can now promote the whole of the land Braintree is the largest and site disposal. Parts within the red line as a strategic and comprehensively master most sustainable settlement in via Convent of site within planned development. Attached to this form is an illustrative the District. The east of Broad Lane. Cycle and 250m of historic master plan of the proposed development (No. 2213/001 E) Road site is the next logical pedestrian landfill. which can provide an attractive package of benefits to development area for Braintree access west Braintree. This includes Town. It has clearly defined and to Broad Road - up to 1,000 dwellings in a mix of sizes, types and tenures long term boundaries. It is also and south (including affordable housing) a viable site which is capable of across the - a new employment area to the north of the existing sewage providing first completions River works within the first five year period Blackwater. - a riverside park on the northern side of the River Blackwater and being fully developed over - the removal of the low grade employment uses in the centre 10 years. of the site and the remediation of the area - a new primary access on to the A131, a subsidiary access on to Broad Road and the closure of the current access from the site via Convent Lane - the provision of a network of footpaths and cycleways linking the development to the Town Centre and the rest of the town

BOCN134 BON5CH 678 Land at Church N/A Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No Site Allocations Abbeyfield Trust Melville Abbeyfield Trust 0.77 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside N/A Urban Access from None None Slopes from Low Probability Opposite Grade None None None This site has previously been considered through the Site Pre-submission N/A No N/A 40 Y Y Y Development Discharge of Site allocated in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Lane, Bocking Town and Dunbar Land and Church Lane west to east (Zone 1) II listed buildings Allocations and Development Management Plan process. The allocation boundary planning the Site Development Associates residential, towards River whole of the site was allocated for the provision of a care without amendment conditions Allocations and Management urban fringe Brain Valley home. permission would be Development Plan This submission therefore confirms the Abbeyfield Trust’s required Management proposal to provide an extra care facility on the site. Plan (2014). The number of elderly people is growing as a proportion of the total population both nationally and in Braintree District. There will therefore be an increasing need to provide accommodation for the elderly. The proposal for the site is to provide extra care facilities. The concept of extra care is a more recent form of accommodation for older people that falls between traditional sheltered housing and a care home. The site is at the edge of the Braintree and Bocking urban area and has good access to services, facilities and public transport. Access can be obtained from Church Lane and there are no physical constraints to its development. The Trust recognises that the site is sensitive in landscape terms. BOCN135 BON10 N/A Land at Church N/A Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No Site Allocations A Stevenson Mr Trevor N/A 1.44 Vacant Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A Church Street None None Flat Low Probability Existing None None None One High Garrett forms an extension of Bocking Church Street None N/A No N/A 40 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Street (Four Town and Dodkins Residential/wo (Zone 1) which is within walking distance and has a good range of boundary included in Releet Development odland facilities including schools, post office, shops and pubs. amendment current strategy Meadow), High Management Braintree itself is very close. would be could be Garrett Plan required considered under new Local Plan

BOCN137 BON12 N/A Towerlands Towerlands, Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No Core Strategy Repairbrook Ltd Mr Nick The Unex Group 42.79 Vacant / Previously Countryside Medium - Low 16a Established FP42 runs along Some TPO Refer to Low Probability refer to None None suspected None suspected No restrictive The site is in the ownership of a single owner, committed to None N/A No N/A 1150 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Park, between Panfield Lane Town Stafford, Ltd redundant Developed Land and CS Mixed (Medium primary southern groups on topographical (Zone 1) accompanying covenants. delivering the site. The site has been vacant for a boundary included in Panfield Lane Associate, former and Greenfield Use Growth Low) and vehicular boundary of boundary of site survey WSP report Easements for considerable time and is considered available for delivery amendment current strategy and Deanery Hill David Lock Towerlands Location (not 16b access off site. on the northern gas and water within 0-5 years. The comprehensive analysis provided on would be could be Associates leisure / started) (Medium) Deanery Hill via edge. pipes. technical matters demonstrates the capacity and required considered conference / Panfield Road, appropriateness of the site for allocation and development, under new Local equestrian with two representing a sustainable development and location for a Plan centre and golf additional points new strategic growth area. As such, the sites consideration course of access off for future allocation as a strategic growth area for mixed use Deanery Hill development, including 1150 homes should therefore be supported within the new Local Plan. BOCN502 N/A N/A Rear of 263 N/A Braintree Bocking North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Knight Mr Kevin Mr William 0.6 Scrub land Greenfield Countryside Low 14b A131 No TPO/Group TPO Flat Flood Zone 1 No issues None Unknown Unknown None Monken Hadley House was the subject of permission in 2001 None None None N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Broad Road Town Developments Coleman Anthony, Knight and residential to boundaries expected (01/01414) for conversion and new build to create 21 boundary included in Ltd Developments residential units. The proposed site lies adjacent to the amendment current strategy Ltd access drive to the original scheme, on a parcel of vacant would be could be land adj to the driveway to the completed development. The required considered proposal would increase the overall number of units from the under new Local consented 2 to circa 27, in a location which would have little Plan or no impact on the character of the adjoining area but also located close to Braintree with an existing bus route adjoining the site entrance. N/A BON32 571 N/A Christy House Braintree Bocking North Main Town Yes Planning Anglia Mr Robert Anglia 0.35 Vacant building Previously Residential N/A Urban Access from FP65 TPO group on No Site part within None None Not Known No Conservation PER with full 13/00749/FUL No Site work 20 Y Y Y Site has benefit 7 7 13 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in and Chantry Permission Commercial Pomery, Commercial Ltd (Derelict Developed Land Church Street part of site flood zone 2 contamination area planning started of planning Cfs House, Church Ltd/Anglia Pomery building) 17/08- G1 and identified on site permission permission Street Retirement Planning TPO 15/08 T2 Homes Ltd Consultants draft Ltd N/A N/A 699 Evegate, and N/A Braintree Bocking North Main Town Yes Planning Mr D Cameron Mr D N/A 0.47 Existing house Previously Residential, N/A Urban Thistley Green None None Flat Low Probability Existing None None None Part PD rights N/A Planning 13/00278/FUL Complete Finished 5 Y Y Y Site has 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 Yes Site complete REMOVED stableblock to Permission MacDougall and stable block Developed Land edge of town Road (Zone 1) removed permission planning COMPLETED rear, 1 Thistley and Greenfield permission for Green housing Road/Broad Road N/A N/A 717 Land adj Fern N/A Braintree Bocking North Main Town No Planning Braintree Mr Andy N/A 0.4 Grounds of care Greenfield Residential/Ca N/A Urban Broad Road None TPOs to Flat Low Probability Existing Adjacent SMR_6253 None None N/A Planning 14/00903/FUL Yes Building 12 Y Y Y Site has 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 No N/A Lodge 108 Permission Healthcare Ltd Butcher home re home and boundary (Zone 1) historic road permission started planning Broad Road countryside permission for housing BOCS138 BOS3 N/A Land at Lodge N/A Braintree Bocking South Main Town Yes Site Allocations Mr James Capel House 8 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A Springwood PROWs to None Gentle slope Low Probability Existing None on site, None None None The site will provide much needed employment land for the Allocation N/A No No 0 N Y Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Promoted for REMOVED not Farm, Rayne and Moore, Property Trust Land and Drive North East and (Zone 1) grade II listed District and is a natural extension of Springwood Drive employment proposed for Road Development Director Ltd employment South East building on employment area. housing Management boundary. adjacent site. Plan

BOCS139 BOS2 N/A Land forming N/A Braintree Bocking South Adjacent Main No Site Allocations Dr Reg Patel Mr Andrew N/A 1.268 Garden/Domesti Greenfield Residential to N/A N/A Church Lane None TPO Group to Flat Low Probability Existing None None None Unknown It will be noted from the plan enclosed that it is intended that None N/A No No 5 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smaller extent part of Town and C/O Agent McLeod c either side, adj front of site. (Zone 1) land to the back of the proposed site is to be retained as part boundary included in submitted in Cfs Fairacres, Development field, river to of the ownership of Fair Acres. This will be a paddock and a amendment current strategy Church Lane Management rear. buffer between the proposed houses and open land, beyond would be could be Plan forming part of the valley to the east. Currently, there is required considered residential development on each side of Church Lane to the under new Local east and west of the proposed site. There is further Plan development on the opposite side of Church Lane all the way along the frontage of Fair Acres. The subject land is amenity space in relation to Fair Acres but is much greater than the house warrants. The proposed scheme merely infills land between 2 existing residential properties and thus will form a definitive cut-off between Braintree and Bocking on the east side along Church Lane. It is considered that the proposal would not have an effect on the visual aspect when looking across the valley towards the west.

Page 3 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

BOCS141 Includes N/A Land at N/A Braintree Bocking South Main Town No Call for Sites Mr Yves Mr Andy N/A 3.64 B2/B8 Previously Employment, N/A Urban Existing from FP62/PROW None Relatively level Low Probability To existing None None Possible Current occupiers The site is well placed for redevelopment, having many Allocated for N/A No N/A 55 Y N Y ADMP Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Larger extent BOS34X Bradbury Bathels, Gladhill, Land Developed Land recreation and Swinbourne 68_62, (Zone 1) network on short term buildings that have been in place for over 40 years, and which employment allocation from included in submitted in Cfs Drive/Swinbourn Director, EPISO Partner, and Greenfield residential Drive through FP62/PROW leases have largely reached the end of their useful lives. There are amendment Environmental current strategy e Drive 3 Tree William H industrial estate 68_61 adj W/N also pre-fabricated structures on the site which are very would be Health re. could be Investment Brown / From Malyon boundaries dilapidated in form. required noise/pollution considered Properties A Close Whilst it is acknowledged that the site is currently highlighted issues under new Local Sarl within the Braintree District Local Plan Review 2005 for B1, Plan B2 and B8 uses, it does abut residential properties (Malyon Close to the east), and therefore we are of the view that a mixed use scheme could benefit local residents, by removing heavy industrial and open air storage uses away from them. In its present state the site is not attractive to potential occupiers but it is too risky to redevelop the site for purely commercial uses on a speculative basis. A residential element could 'pump-prime' the site, to enable site rationalisation and redevelopment.

N/A BOS10SHL 489 N/A Land at Eagle Braintree Bocking South Main Town Yes Planning Royal Masonic Richard Mabb 0.69 Scrubland Previously Residential N/A Urban Access from No public Low Probability Bte691 - Food N/A PER with outline 12/01538/OUT No N/A 15 Y Y Y Discharge of Site has benefit 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in AA Lane Permission Benevolent Planning (amenity land) Developed Land Church Lane footpaths (Zone 1) processing, planning planning of outline Cfs, with pp for Institution. and Tenter through site brewing, permission conditions permission 19 dwellings, 15 Close maltings net capacity

N/A BOS16 676 N/A Harkilees Way Braintree Bocking South Main Town Yes Urban Capacity Braintree N/A N/A 0.673 Recreation area Greenfield Residential N/A Urban Access from FP143 runs None Gentle gradient Low Probability None Southern tip of None None Unknown N/A None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Current open Site is within 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Study District Council and Informal Harkilees Way through site. (Zone 1) site adjoins space use, not development Cfs Recreation Precise route of Conservation allocated as boundary and path needs to Area such has no other be established allocations N/A BRC6 556 N/A Land r/o Horse Braintree Bocking South Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Multiple N/A 0.57 Backland/Allotm Previously Residential to N/A Urban Rayne None None None Low probability None Conservation SMR_6288/628 None Unknown None None Allocated for None No No 20 Y Y Y Current use Site is in Site is within 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in and Groom PH Ownership ents/ Public Developed Land the rear, Road/Panfield (Zone 1) Area/ adj listed 9 residential needs to multiple development Cfs House/ former and Greenfield retail/pub to Lane buildings relocate ownership. boundary and car show room front Would need the has no other relocation of allocations allotments N/A BON13/BOS 642 N/A Land to the Braintree Bocking South Main Town Yes Core Strategy Mersea Homes 44 Agricultural Greenfield Residential Medium 16d Panfield Yes through TPO Relatively flat Low probability SUDS None Unknown None None None None Master Plan No No Master Plan 600 Y Y Y Core Strategy 0 0 150 150 150 150 0 600 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in 6/ north-west of & Hills Land and golf and Lane/Springwoo middle (Zone 1) adopted, EIA Growth Cfs BOS8 Braintree, off Residential course countryside d Drive Screening Location Panfield Lane awaiting planning application N/A BOS27 719 Garage Court N/A Braintree Bocking South Main Town Yes Planning Greenfields Ingleton Greenfields 0.32 Garage block Previously Residential N/A Urban Arnham Grove No No Flat Low Probability Existing N/A Approved 13/00845/FUL Yes Yes 5 Y Y Y Site has 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in land off Permission Community Wood Community Developed Land (Zone 1) planning Cfs Coldnailhurst Housing Housing permission for Avenue housing N/A BOS7 721 Sandon House, N/A Braintree Bocking South Main Town Yes Planning Chris Loon NNC Homes Ltd 0.18 Residential and Previously Countryside Medium 16d Panfield Lane To northern None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None Approved 14/00919/FUL No None 7 Y Y Y Site has 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Planning Panfield Lane Permission garden land Developed Land and residenital boundary (Zone 1) planning permission for and Greenfield permission for larger extent housing than submitted for Site Alloc doc, permission for 8 dwellings, 7 net capacity

BCBG144 BRC3 N/A Land off East N/A Braintree Braintree Main Town No Site Allocations Carier Mr Ray Ricks N/A 2 Mix of Previously Residential/Em N/A N/A East Street None None Flat Low Probability Existing None None Yes Within 250 Unknown Proposal to include whole site regeneration to comprise mixed None N/A No None 64 N Y Y Current Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Street Central and and (Braintree) Ltd commercial Developed Land ployment (Zone 1) of a historic use development. About 64 no. dwellings and 9 No. class B1 employment included in Beckers Green Development units/demolishe landfill, and units totalling 18,000 sqft allocation current strategy Management d small unknown could be Plan landfill. considered under new Local Plan BCBG145 N/A N/A Land at Corner N/A Braintree Braintree Main Town No Call for Sites Mr John Pease Mr Ian Reilly, Mr Karl 0.25 Informal car Previously Residential/Em N/A N/A Albert None None Flat Low Probability Existing None Unknown Unknown None None N/A No None 10 N Y Y Current Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Albert Central and Senior Pickering parking Developed Land ployment Road/Manor (Zone 1) employment included in Road/Manor Beckers Green Planner Road allocation current strategy Road could be considered under new Local Plan BCBG146 BRE3 N/A Car park and N/A Braintree Braintree Main Town No Call for Sites Low Probability Bulky Retail None 0 Not proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed REMOVED - land north of Central and (Zone 1) Allocation for housing for housing Not proposed Freeport Beckers Green for housing Braintree BCBG147 BRC3 part N/A 1-6 The Mazes, N/A Braintree Braintree Main Town No Call for Sites Mr Ian Hawkins, N/A 0.27 Employment Previously Employment N/A N/A East Street None None Flat Low Probability Existing None None Unknown None In my proposal to have the current site considered to Employment None No None 5 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A East Street Central and Director Developed Land (Zone 1) allocation for housing I would suggest the following: Allocation amendment included in Beckers Green A) The current units are within close concentric proximity to would be current strategy Braintree town centre (shops, employment, social needs) & required could be given the modern new schemes detailed above this proposed considered site area would be better served as being included in the local under new Local plans as allocation for housing needs & residential Plan redevelopment. B) The current spatial layout of the existing site & buildings, including the land (yard & similar not occupied by physical buildings) only caters for five units, whereas redevelopment for a more aesthetically pleasing housing scheme could potentially cater for 36-40 + residential dwellings. C)The current proposed site is close to public transport services (bus station & railway station), various shops / supermarkets & within close proximity to local schools & therefore would suit change of use to allow for housing. D) All existing business' could relocate to other suitable units in the Braintree district &

BCBG148 BRC1 N/A Land R/O 33 N/A Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Site Allocations Mr H Bishop N/A Mr H Bishop 0.058 Curtilage of pub Previously Residential/Em N/A N/A Notley Road None None Low Probability Existing Grade 2 listed None 250m from None It's within 5 minutes from town centre + stations and with no None N/A No None 2 N Y Y Site is below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Notley Road Central and and Developed Land ployment (Zone 1) building to front historic landfill factories, it's quiet. threshold threshold below threshold Beckers Green Development of site. Management Plan BCBG149 BRE25 part 652 Braintree Braintree Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Site Allocations Mr Lee Harding N/A N/A 1.8 Football Ground Greenfield Residential N/A N/A Via Clockhouse PROW 68_88 Area TPO on Low Probability Existing None None Part within None We would suggest that this site should be considered Site Allocation N/A No N/A 75 Y N Y Current use Site allocated in 0 0 0 0 40 35 0 75 0 0 0 0 No N/A Football Club Football Club Central and and (Chairman) Way on southern part of (Zone 1) 250m buffer alongside the adjacent Braintree Council land currently leased needs to the Site Clockhouse Beckers Green Development Braintree Town boundary southeast of zone for historic to Braintree Town Football Club, the site occupied by relocate Allocations and Way Management FC site 16/88 A1 landfill Braintree Lawn Tennis Club and the land between Braintree Development Plan Lawn Tennis Club and Millennium Way. Management Plan (2014). BCBG550 Land off Braintree Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Site Allocations Braintree 4.364 Part used as Greenfield Residential/pla N/A N/A Millennium PROW on three TPO to Flat Low probability Existing None None Within 250m Access from third Site allocation N/A No N/A 95 Y Y Y Site allocated in 0 0 0 0 0 35 60 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Millennium Way Tennis Central and and District Council football training ying Way/Clockhous sides boundary (Zone 1) buffer zone from party land the Site Club/Former Beckers Green Development pitch/tennis club field/employme e Way historic landfill Allocations and Chapel Hill Management and vacant land nt Development playing field Plan Management Plan (2014). BCBG150 BRE16 N/A Land at Stubbs Stubbs Lane Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Call for Sites Mr A Epsom N/A N/A 0.3469 Vacant land Greenfield Residential/em N/A N/A From Stubbs No public No TPOs on Low Probability Existing None None None None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Lane Central and (Head of Asset ployment Lane footpaths site - however, (Zone 1) development Beckers Green Management), through site significant trees boundary and Braintree present has no other District Council allocations BCBG151 N/A N/A Land rear of N/A Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Call for Sites Mr Andrew N/A N/A 1.05 Amenity Greenfield Residential/em N/A N/A Trotters Field None None Slight Low Probability Existing None None None Access may be None N/A No N/A 25 Y Y Y Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Trotters Field Central and Epsom greenspace ployment (Zone 1) required through development Beckers Green Greenfields land. boundary and has no other allocations N/A BRC30 623 N/A Telephone Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Urban Capacity BT PLC & Parkland 0.693 Scrub land Previously Residential N/A Urban South Street None None Gentle slope Low probability None None 6427 Within 250m of None None None Planning 15/00079/DAC No Discharge of 11 Y Y Y Discharge of Site has 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in exchange, Central and Study Telereal Developments Developed Land Telephone (Zone 1) historic landfill permission conditions planning planning Cfs South Street Beckers Green Services Ltd Exchange conditions permission for Limited housing N/A BRC31 548 N/A Silks Way site Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Urban Capacity Braintree N/A 0.395 Employment Previously Residential/mo N/A Urban South Street None None Relatively flat Low probability None Conservation None None None None None Site allocation None No N/A 10 Y Y Y Seek advice Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Central and Study District Council Developed Land sque/ (Zone 1) Area and listed from heritage development Cfs Beckers Green telephone buildings on site specialists boundary and exchange has no other allocations N/A BRC34 677 N/A Kwik Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Urban Capacity Kwik Fit Rapleys N/A 0.22 Garage and Previously Residential N/A Urban South Street None None Flat to south Low probability Existing None None Unknown None None None Site allocation None No N/A 10 Y Y Y Current use Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Fit/Builders yard Central and Study former builders Developed Land street slopes (Zone 1) needs to development Cfs adj the Beckers Green yard down to Station relocate boundary and Mulberries, Approach has no other South Street allocations N/A BRC76 650 N/A Crossman Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Colne Housing Gripping 0.166 Former office Previously Residential/buil N/A Urban Station None None Gentle slope Low Probability Existing None None Potentially Ransom strip to None None Allocation 15/00522/DEM No Demolition 18 Y Y Y Needs planning Site is within 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in House, Station Central and Society Construction building Developed Land ders yard Approach/South (Zone 1) Contaminated Station Approach started permission development Cfs Approach Beckers Green Street Land/Within boundary and 250m of Historic has no other Landfill allocations N/A BRE1 654 N/A Detached Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Braintree N/A 0.98 Former school Greenfield Tennis club/vet N/A Urban Millennium Two adjacent None Flat Low Probability SUDS None None Within 250m of Part ransom strip None None Allocation N/A No Site allocated 30 Y Y Y Needs planning Site is within 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Playing Field, Central and District Council playing field Way/Clockhous (Zone 1) a historic landfill to Millennium permission development Cfs Chapel Hill Beckers Green e Way Way boundary and has no other allocations N/A BRE17 375 Kalestead, Kalestead, Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Kalstead Melville N/A 0.584 Works Previously Residential N/A Urban Cressing Road None TPO's Flat Low Probability Existing None None None None None None Site Allocation None No N/A 14 Y Y Y Needs planning Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Cressing Road Cressing Road Central and Limited Dunbar Developed Land (Zone 1) permission development Cfs Beckers Green boundary and has no other allocations N/A BRE26 653 N/A Braintree Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Site Allocations Mr A Epsom N/A N/A 1.06 Tennis Club Greenfield Residential/foo N/A Urban Millennium PROW adjacent TPO on Flat Low Probability Existing None None Part within Ransom strip to None None None N/A No N/A 65 Y Y Y Current use Site is within 0 0 0 0 35 30 0 65 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Tennis Club off Central and and (Head of Asset tball club Way/Clockhous boundary (Zone 1) 250m buffer Millennium Way needs to development Cfs Clockhouse Beckers Green Development Management), training ground e Way zone for historic relocate boundary and Way/Millennium Management Braintree landfill has no other Way Plan District Council allocations N/A BRC77 649 N/A Timber Yard Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Urban Capacity Essex Board N/A N/A 0.8 Wood yard Previously Residential/Va N/A Urban Station None None Sloped Low Probability Existing None None None Unknown N/A Allocation None No None 10 Y Y Y Current use Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in East of Central and Study and Timber Developed Land cant office Approach (Zone 1) needs to development Cfs Crossman Beckers Green Company relocate boundary and House Station has no other Approach allocations N/A N/A 443 N/A Land rear of Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Planning TLC Property Mr D Farrow N/A 0.05 Backland Previously Residential N/A Urban South Street None None Sloped Low Probability Existing None None None Unknown N/A Planning 12/01616/FUL No Permission 6 Y Y Y Site has 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in 180 South Central and Permission Developments Developed Land (Zone 1) Permission planning Cfs Street Beckers Green permission for housing N/A N/A 483 N/A Blandford Braintree Braintree Main Town Yes Planning Grahams Edward N/A 0.18 Planning 12/01344/FUL Yes Permission 14 Y Y Y Site has 0 0 10 0 4 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in House, 7 Central and Permission Building Parsley Permission planning Cfs London Road Beckers Green Services Associates permission for Ltd housing BRSO152 N/A N/A Land adj N/A Braintree Braintree South Main Town No Call for Sites Mr Mark Brand N/A N/A 0.7 Informal Greenfield Informal N/A N/A Station adjacent to site None Slight Low Probability Existing None None Yes unknown Unknown The site has only a small amount of scattered immature trees None None None No None 100 Y Y N Removal of Remediation of Access is Site has a very 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Braintree recreation recreation Approach (Zone 1) landfill and is made up generally of grass. The site is regularly informal contaminated constrained. difficult access Railway Station, abused by the misuse of persons from elicited dealings such recreation land which may not Station Road, as drugs and drinking. There have also been several allocation be suitable for Braintree muggings along the and with the site and would therefore be residential better suited for housing and will improve social behaviour. development

N/A BRS26 396 N/A Heathlands/ Braintree Braintree South Main Town Yes Previous Bellway Homes Bellway Homes 4.54 Former golf Greenfield Residential/A1 N/A Urban Mill Park Drive PROW on other No Slight Low Probability Existing None None None None None None Planning 07/00985/FUL/ Yes Under 78 Y Y Y Site has 0 35 35 8 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Land South of Planning Ltd Ltd course 20/Freeport side of river (Zone 1) Permission BTE/99/0003/F construction planning Cfs Mill Hill Permission UL/BTE/05/010 permission for 74/FUL/13/0146 housing 1/FUL N/A BRS35 684 N/A The Rose and Braintree Braintree South Main Town Yes Planning White Rose and Mr Q Nawaz N/A 0.09 Former pub Previously Residential/sh N/A N/A Masefield Road None None Slight Low Probability Existing None None None None None None Planning 14/01115/FUL No None 14 Y Y Y Site has 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Crown Permission Crown Developed Land ops (Zone 1) Permission planning Cfs Masefield Road Development permission for Limited housing BRAW153 BRC80 N/A Broomhills N/A Braintree Braintree West Main Town No Site Allocations Plutus Esates Mr James Plutus Estates 2.85 Vacant Previously Residential N/A N/A Pod's Brook No Some to Slopes Low Probability Existing None Very low None Unknown The development could be delivered in the short term, in one Detailed work would need to be None N/A N/A No 150 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Industrial and (Braintree) Ltd Waterhouse (Braintree) Ltd employment Developed Land Road northern downward from (Zone 1) potential phase, with the construction taking between 9 and 12 months undertaken to confirm how amendment included in Estate, Pods Development boundary road to complete much the site could exactely would be current strategy Brook Road Management accommodate but an indicative required could be Plan assessment suggests that a considered density of between 50 to 70 under new Local dwellings per hectare can be Plan accommodated on the site. This would ensure that the potential of this brownfield site is maximised, especially given its location.

Page 4 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

N/A BRC8 555 N/A William Julien Braintree Braintree West Main Town Yes Planning N/A 0 Site has Yes Completed REMOVED Courtauld Permission planning COMPLETED Hospital Site, permission for London Road housing GNBN264 BRC7H Land between Braintree Great Notley Main Town Yes Site Allocations Mr Sam Caslin 9.19 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/re Medium - Low 20e London Road None TPOs on site Slopes toward Flood Zone 1 No issues None Unknown Unknown None The site continues to present an excellent opportunity for None None None N/A 150 Y Y Y Site is within 0 0 0 50 50 50 0 150 0 0 0 0 No N/A London Road, and Black and sidential and group river expected sustainable residential development within Braintree. Land development A120 and Pod's Notley Development TPOS west of London Road will make a valuable contribution to the boundary and Brook Road Management districts housing land-supply and it is immediately available. It has no other Plan has been supported by Braintree District Council throughout allocations the progression of the Core Strategy and the submission Site Allocation DPD and remains compliant with the existing planning policies of the district.

GNBN265 BRC7D Land north east Braintree Great Notley Adjacent Main No Core Strategy Mr Andrew Mr Mike 23 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/R Low 20a London Yes (Flitchway) None Generally level Flood Zone 1 SUDS None Unknown Unknown None Countryside properties considers that the land north east of None None None N/A 420 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A of and Black Town Martin Lambert, esidential/A12 Road/Rayne Queenborough Lane is available, achievable and suitable and included in Queenborough Notley Countryside 0 Road that there is planning merit in allocating the site as a new (or current strategy Lane and south Properties (UK) part new) residential led growth location in the forthcoming could be of Flitch Way Ltd Local Plan considered under new Local Plan GNBW265/2 BRC7A/D West of Pod's Flitchway Braintree Great Notley Adjacent Main No Core Strategy Mr Andrew Mr Mike 23 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/A Low 20a Working on a The Flitch Way Flitchway to the Gentle slope Minor areas SUDS None Further work Unknown None Countryside properties considers that the land north east of None N/A No N/A 420 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A 66 Brook Road Settlement and Black Town Martin Andrew Lambert, Land 120 comprehensive abuts the north side is from the west within Flood required Queenborough Lane is available, achievable and suitable and boundary included in (Land to south Notley Martin Countryside access strategy northern Local Wildlife and south to the Zones 2/3 that there is planning merit in allocating the site as a new (or amendment current strategy of Gilda Planning Ltd Properties (UK) that encourages boundary Two Site. Brain Valley part new) residential led growth location in the forthcoming would be could be Terrace, Rayne Ltd sustainable existing toward the north Local Plan. required considered Road/Land west transport habits footpaths within east. under new Local of Braintree the site. Plan Town) BULM155 BUL1 N/A Land East of St N/A Bulmer Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Braintree N/A N/A 1.17 Grazing land Greenfield Residential, (Relatively high (A2/B6) Access from St FP3/PROW None Slopes gently Low Probability Adj None None N/A No N/A 29 Y N Y Development Current lease Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Andrews South Village District Council church, POS, sensitivity to Andrews Rise 69_3 southern over most of (Zone 1) conservation boundary on land for included in fields change) boundary, site, highest in area, Grade II amendment horse grazing current strategy FP4/PROW corner nearest Listed Warlin would be runs until 2016 could be 69_4 near church and Langley required considered eastern Cottage to under new Local boundary north, Grade I Plan Listed St Andrew's Church to SE BULM156 N/A N/A Land north of 20 N/A Bulmer Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites C/o Agent John Finch Granville 0.49 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (B6) Access from None None Slopes gently Low Probability Ditch system None None None Immediately developable None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Church Road South Village Partnership Developments Land residential sensitivity to Church Road down to NW (Zone 1) boundary included in change) amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan BULM157 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Bulmer Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites C/o Agent John Finch Granville 0.92 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (B6) Access from None None Slopes gently Low Probability Ditch system None None None Immediately developable None N/A No N/A 18 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hill Crest, South Village Partnership Developments Land residential sensitivity to Church Road down towards N (Zone 1) boundary included in Church Road, change) amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan BULM158 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Bulmer Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites C/o Agent John Finch Granville 0.36 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (B6) Access from None None Relatively flat Low Probability Ditch system None None None Immediately developable None N/A No N/A 7 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Church Road South Village Partnership Developments Land residential sensitivity to Church Road (Zone 1) boundary included in (opp. pond) change) amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan BULM159 N/A N/A Land east of N/A Bulmer Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites C/o Agent John Finch Granville 0.61 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (B6) Access from None No TPOs, Flat Low Probability Ditch system None None None Immediately developable None N/A No N/A 12 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Church Road South Village Partnership Developments Land residential sensitivity to Church Road mature (Zone 1) boundary included in (opp. nos 1-10), change) Oak/Horse amendment current strategy Bulmer Chestnut nr would be could be entrance/adj required considered farm track under new Local Plan BULM160 N/A N/A Land rear of N/A Bulmer Tye Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites C/o Agent John Finch Granville 1.62 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (B6) Access from None None Relatively flat Low Probability Ditch system None None None Accident Immediately developable None N/A No N/A 32 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (east) nos 1-4 South Village Partnership Developments Land residential, sensitivity to A131 (Zone 1) blackspot boundary included in Ryes Lane, A131 change) amendment current strategy Bulmer Tye would be could be required considered under new Local Plan BULM162 N/A N/A Land east of N/A Bulmer Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites C/o Agent John Finch Granville 0.34 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (A2) Access from None None Relatively flat Low Probability Ditch system None Archaeological None Immediately developable None N/A No N/A 7 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smeethams Hall South Village Partnership Developments Land residential sensitivity to Smeetham Hall (Zone 1) significance not boundary included in Lane (Adj change) Lane known amendment current strategy Ridgecroft) SMR8532 would be could be required considered under new Local Plan BULM163 N/A N/A Land east of N/A Bulmer Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites C/o Agent John Finch Granville 1.94 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (A2) Access from None None Slopes down Low Probability Ditch system None None None Immediately developable None N/A No N/A 39 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Church South Village Partnership Developments Land residential sensitivity to Church Road / towards north (Zone 1) boundary included in Road/Sudbury change) Sudbury Road amendment current strategy Road (South of would be could be The Old required considered Vicarage) under new Local Bulmer Plan BULM164 BUL4 N/A Land at junction N/A Bulmer Tye Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mrs Marilyn N/A N/A 1.39 Scrub Land Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (A2) Access from None No TPOs/wildlife Relatively flat Low Probability None None Archaeological None On a bus route, the village has a school, within 2 miles of a None N/A No N/A 36 Y Y Y Development Archaeological Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Larger extent of Church Road South Village O'Reilly-Cicconi (heavily residential, sensitivity to Church Road designations (Zone 1) significance not railway station, and more adjoining land could be developed boundary survey required included in submitted under and A131 & Mr Nigel wooded) A131, change) site is known so this makes the site very sustainable amendment (online records current strategy Cfs Burke allotments extensively SMR9388, would be indicate could be wooded with (Viking burial required medieval motte considered mature native site) and bailey under new Local trees remains, Plan applicant refers to Viking burial) BULM504 N/A N/A Griggs Farm, N/A Bulmer Stour Valley Other Village / Yes/No Call for Sites Mr Barclay N/A N/A 1.6 Residential Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (A2) Access from None None Relatively flat Low Probability Natural drainage Griggs is Grade Bulmer Street None Griggs Farm is a Grade II listed building set in around 4 acres None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Bulmer Street South Adjacent Other Dutson garden/Paddock residential sensitivity to Bulmer Street (PROW69_3/F (Zone 1) to farmland to II listed, in/Adj lies along the (1.6 hectares) of garden and paddock. Alongside stands a boundary included in Village change) P3 comes out north conservation projected line of small single-storey barn, thought to be 19th Century, listed amendment current strategy opp. Site) area a Roman road within the curtilage to Griggs Farm. The garden to the front would be could be (Magarys Route and side (south/west) of the house, and an area behind the required considered 33a) barn (north), is included within the Village Envelope. Griggs is under new Local thought to have been built in 1604. Minor planning Plan applications were granted in the 2000s for tree pruning, for a new bathroom and WC, and for the rebuilding of a chimney. The current owner has been in residence since 1962. The barn was used by cattle (troughs are still there) and horses. Water for the livestock came from the pond on the opposite side of the road. Water mains to the house were not connected until 1963. The lands were originally farmed as part of Auberies estate. By the latter half of the 18th Century two farms, one north, the other south of The Street, were combined as Griggs and Swains, owned by William Jennens. In the 19th Century William Bird farmed Griggs, then Charles Bird who farmed 280 acres with 12 men and 3 boys in 1871 and finally John Burlingham. At the turn of century came W. S. Courtnell who farmed it together with Kitchens. The adjacent large Tudor barn (now Suffolk Hall), dating from the same period as the house, was converted into a dwelling in the 1970s. (ref: Bulmer Parish Council et al).

If the whole site is to be developed, the plan is to create a development sensitive to the character of Griggs, and the countryside it is set in.

BULM551 0.2 Previously None None N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Developed Land boundary included in and Greenfield amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan BURE166 N/A N/A Land south of N/A Bures Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Braintree N/A N/A 1.1237 Agricultural Greenfield Residential/Co (Relatively high (A2) Over adjoining None None Relatively flat Low Probability Existing None Archaeological None None None N/A N/A N/A 25 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Cambridge Way South Village District Council untryside sensitivity to field from (Zone 1) significance not boundary included in change) Colchester known amendment current strategy Road SMR_9191 would be could be required considered under new Local Plan BURE526 N/A N/A Windy Ridge, N/A Bures Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Jeremy N/A As per owner 0.2804 Residential Previously Countryside/ed (Relatively high (A2) From Colne None None Slopes up to SE Low Probability Existing None None None Unknown None None 15/01020/FUL No Pending 3 Y Y Y Site is below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Colne Road South Village Runicles Developed Land ge of village sensitivity to Road (Zone 1) Consideration threshold for threshold below threshold and Greenfield change) allocation N/A N/A N/A Former Garage N/A Bures Stour Valley Other Village Y Brownfield Call CCC Property The Planning N/A 0.11 Vacant Previously Village centre, N/A Urban From None None Flat Entirely in Flood Conservation None Bte063 PC comments - The site has been the subject of previous None N/A N/A N/A 0 N Y Y FRA would be Site is entirely 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Flood Zone REMOVED site 7-9 South for Sites & Design Developed Land opp. Pub Colchester Zone 2/3 Area Gasworks planning applications and the Parish Council would support required within Flood 2/3 Flood Zone 2/3 - Colchester Rd Bureau Road some residential development here if provision was made for Zone 2/3 Brownfield site a convenience store on the site. A retail store being essential identified by to make our village viable. Parish Council GGHR280 N/A N/A Land adj N/A Burtons Green Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites Peter Trumpeter Mr Damien N/A 1.476 Scrub land Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A Yes (Byway None Flat Low Probability Existing None Unknown Unknown None None None N/A N/A 10 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Mystycroft Greenstead Lockley (Zone 1) included in Burtons Green Green current strategy could be considered under new Local Plan CASH167 CAS1/CAS6 N/A Land r/o 118- N/A Castle Hedingham Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Peter Westrop N/A N/A 0.45 Derelict piggery Greenfield Residential/Co (Relatively high (A4) Nunnery Street None TPO on site Flood Zone 2 to Existing None on site, None None None I believe the site in Nunnery Street, Castle Hedingham, would None None N/A N/A 1 Y Y Y Site is below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED 132 Nunnery Hedingham Village untryside sensitivity to front part of site listed buildings be ideal for a single dwelling, it would be the best outcome for threshold for threshold below threshold Street change) to front me and the local residents at the moment it is overgrown and allocation and derelict. The buildings that border the site are of little identification in architectural or historic interest. The site is too small to be of the Local Plan any use commercially. If the Councils planning authority can think of a better use of this site I would certainly consider it.

CASH168 N/A N/A Land adj to N/A Castle Hedingham Countryside No Call for Sites Duncan N/A N/A 0.75 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate (B5) Sudbury Road None None Low Probability Existing None None None None None None None N/A N/A 20 N Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hierarchy status Sudbury Road, Hedingham Westrop sensitivity to (Zone 1) included in countryside; Opposite change) current strategy located in group Coppingdown could be of dwellings that Farm considered does not have a under new Local development Plan boundary

CASH169 CAS6 part N/A Land R/O N/A Castle Hedingham Adjacent Other No Call for Sites A R Clark Mr Edward N/A 0.1 Amenity land Greenfield Residential/pri (Relatively high (A4) Nunnery Street None None Low Probability Existing None SMR_6817 None None The release of land on the line of the former Colne Valley None None None 2 N Y Y Site is below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below dwellings Hedingham Village (Builders) Ltd Gittins vate railway sensitivity to (Zone 1) Railway at Castle Hedingham would provide a small new site threshold threshold fronting Nunnery line change) for village housing that is well-related to existing development. Street The site has good defensible boundaries in the form of an existing field hedgerow such that its development would not cause material harm to the character and appearance of the village or its countryside setting.

Castle Hedingham is a significant village with a wide range of community facilities and services which are easily accessible from this sustainably located site. The development of land between the end of the Colne Valley Railway and the village at this point would form a natural extension to the village and “round off” development capable of using the established private drive access as can be seen in the submitted aerial photograph.

Page 5 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

CASH505 CAS3 N/A Colne Valley N/A Castle Hedingham Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Christopher Mr Mark N/A 8.8 Railway/tourist Previously Countryside (Relatively high (A4) Yeldham Road Footpath 71 None Mainly Flat North east Existing None None Not known None The redevelopment of the site fully accords with the None No None None 60 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smaller extent Railway Hedingham Young Jackson, attraction Developed Land sensitivity to boundary in government position on the efficient and maximising re use of included in submitted in Cfs Yeldham Road Mark Jackson change) zone 2 and zone brownfield sites contained within the NPPF. It is confirmed current strategy Planning 3. that the site is available for development in the near future. could be The site is not currently used for housing and the owner and considered the proposer is willing to make the land and buildings available under new Local for new housing and commercial development. Plan

COGG171 N/A N/A Tilkey Road N/A Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mrs Heather Mr Peter N/A 0.68 Grassland Greenfield Residential N/A (A9) Tilkey Road None N/A Gentle Low probability Existing None Unknown Unknown None We are not aware of any undue impact the release of this None N/A No N/A 8 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Service Village Mills Johnson, The and (Zone 1) small portion of land will have on the development of the site. boundary included in Johnson countryside In the even the Honywood Project proceeds the land could be amendment current strategy Dennehy incorporated into residential zone although it stands in its own would be could be Planning rights to be developed. required considered Partnership under new Local Plan COGG172 N/A N/A The Vineyard, N/A Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mrs Jane Beacon N/A 0.51 Vines Greenfield Countryside/R N/A (A9) West Street None TPO on Slopes toward Low probability Existing Adjacent Unknown Unknown Access right The site owners are committed to promoting this site for None N/A No N/A 15 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A West Street Service Village Mohan Planning esidential boundary river (Zone 1) Conservation along western residential development and are keen to work with the Council boundary included in Limited Area boundary to assist in their assessment of the site. The site owners will amendment current strategy be happy to provide further supplementary information if this would be could be is required. required considered under new Local Plan COGG173 N/A N/A Land at N/A Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Adrian Lott, Mr Andrew N/A 0.8 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/re N/A (A9) Abbey Lane Abbey Lane None Gradual slope to Low probability Existing Conservation Unknown Unknown None The site falls within the conservation area, but we feel that the None N/A No N/A 30 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Kelvedon Service Village Managing Hiorns, sidential River (Zone 1) Area contribution of the site is limited, and has had new boundary included in Road/Abbey Director, Director, Blackwater development alongside in the past and offers an opportunity amendment current strategy Lane Parkers of Andrew for a carefully crafted, high quality new residential would be could be Leicester Ltd Hiorns Town development well related to the village and accessible to its required considered Planning Ltd facilities. The site allows the village to grow organically in a under new Local considered and sensitive way, extending the underlying Plan pattern of development, and responding to the features and opportunities presented by the site and location, rather than great lurches of growth that are potentially so unsympathetic and damaging to the underlying character of the village.

COGG174 COG12 205 Land on the Cookfield, East Coggeshall Coggeshall Key Service Yes/No Site Allocations Mr Nick Hicks N/A N/A 1.29 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 2d Currently gated FP64/PROW Group TPO None Low probability Adjacent None None None The site was supported at all stages by Braintree District Allocation N/A No N/A 12 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A south side of Street Village and Land and residential access at NW 72_64 27/04 (Zone 1) conservation Council during the last Development Management Plan as the boundary included in East Street Development corner (G2/G3/G4) area most suitable site to be included in the Coggeshall village amendment current strategy Management envelope. would be could be Plan required considered under new Local Plan COGG175 COG11 N/A Vicarage Fields, Coggeshall Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Chelmsford Mrs Hayley N/A 4.7 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium 4f Access from FP17/PROW Group TPO adj Low probability None Archaeological None Identified as The site is located adjacent to the current defined settlement None N/A No N/A 127 Y N Y Development ADMP Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A West Street Glebe, to the Service Village Diocesan Board Morley, Land and residential West Street 72_17 crosses southern corner (Zone 1) significance not Formal boundary for Coggeshall and outside of the conservation boundary allocation included in rear of 32-78 of Finance Associate site, of site known SMR Recreation in area. Despite the suggestion that the land is used for informal amendment amendment current strategy West Street Planner, Strutt FP20/PROW 8738/8726 LPR2005 and recreation, it is within private ownership and used for would be would be could be and Parker 72_20 eastern Informal agricultural purposes. required required considered boundary Recreation in In the light of the summary of the current housing needs under new Local ADMP position summarised above, if the District Council is minded Plan to identify land for a strategic extension to Coggeshall, they are requested to give due consideration to the availability of the land at Vicarage Fields. COGG176 COG10 N/A Land south of N/A Coggeshall Coggeshall Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Christoper Mrs Hayley N/A 1 Recreation area Greenfield Countryside, Medium 3a West Street Eastern site None Flat Low probability Existing None on site Unknown Unknown None Opportunity for small scale housing development to support None N/A No N/A 11 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hierarchy status West Street Hill Morley, residential, boundary (Zone 1) local communities and vitality of settlements are consistent boundary included in countryside; Associate football ground with NPPF paragraph 55 and the presumption in favour of amendment current strategy located some Planner, Strutt sustainable development which runs through both plan making would be could be distance from and Parker and decision taking. The development of this site would also required considered existing be consistent with the Braintree Core Strategy. under new Local development Plan boundary

COGG177 COG9 N/A Land north of Land north of Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Christopher Mrs Hayley N/A 19.7 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium - Low 4e Farm vehicle FP18/PROW None Slopes west to Majority Low To be None Archaeological Adjacent trunk None The up-to-date housing needs of the Braintree District now None N/A No N/A 500 Y Y Y Development Liaison with Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Ambridge Robinsbridge Service Village Hill Morley, Land trunk road access from 72_18 crosses east probability determined significance not road justifies further consideration of a strategic release of boundary Highways included in Road/Robinsbri Road Associate Ambridge Road the site (Zone 1), Flood following soil known SMR greenfield land in this location in order to meet the housing amendment Authority re. current strategy dge Road Planner, Strutt Zone 2/3 along investigation 8647/8648/864 needs of the area and to prevent the ad-hoc release of land in would be trunk road could be and Parker eastern 9/8689/8791/87 other more sensitive locations. required access considered boundary of site 92 - There will be adequate space within the site for the provision under new Local of structural landscaping, buffers and public open space to Plan ensure that there is no impact on the wildlife interests at the site. In line with the requirements of the NPPF there will be scope within the site to enhance the biodiversity of the site. - The site is located to the north west of the settlement and is well contained by existing physical boundaries including the bypass, Ambridge Road and Robins Brook. The containment of the site and its distance from the historic centre of the village, including the conservation area, will ensure that there is no impact on heritage assets. - Provision will be made within the site for a neighbourhood area of approximately 1 hectare which will contain space for the potential development of shops and a school. This will help to address concerns raised in connection with the availability of educational facilities within the settlement. - There are no known infrastructure constraints or amenity issues that would prevent development. - indicative timescale to come forward 5 to 10 years, no constraints to impede delivery. subject to planning permission, completion within 36-48 months

COGG178 COG7 N/A Land adj Colne Land adjacent Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Ardencrest Ltd Mrs Catherine Ardencrest Ltd. 2.1 Agricultural Greenfield School playing Medium (C1) Access from No public None Flat Low probability None None Adjacent trunk The site is considered to be a sustainable location with a mix None N/A No N/A 54 Y Y Y Liaison with Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Road and A120 to Colne Road Service Village Pollard, Land field, Colne Road footpaths (Zone 1) road, safety of uses in the vicinity including residential development, Highways boundary included in Bypass (north and A120 Senior countryside, through site concerns with employment land at Priors Way and Honywood School. It is Authority re. amendment current strategy of Honeywood bypass Planner, industrial, trunk existing also within easy reach of the facilities and services in trunk road would be could be School) Boyer road junction. Coggeshall. The site has good accessibility being close to access required considered Planning Noise/pollution the A120 and with access to bus services running along under new Local issues may Colne Road providing links to the village centre as well as the Plan need to be wider areas of Braintree and Colchester. The land is explored with currently grassland and as such allows the site to be made environmental available for development immediately, without any significant health team works to prepare for development. No viability appraisals have been undertaken as yet but the site benefits from few constraints and there is no reason at this stage to suggest that the land would not represent a viable site for development.

COGG179 COG15 N/A Land at Priors Land off A120, Coggeshall Coggeshall Key Service No Call for Sites Woodland Mr John N/A 1.9 Industrial Previously Residential, N/A Urban Access from None None Flat Low probability Soakaways and None None Site will need to Employment A substantial bund and tree belt separates and screens the None N/A No N/A 38 Y N Y Local Plan Liaison with Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Way Colne Road, Village Group McLarty, Developed Land trunk road Priors Way/ (Zone 1) SUDS be subject to a allocation in site from the A120; this has visual and noise attenuation employment use Highways from included in Coggeshall Partner, Strutt Colne Road contamination LPR2005/ADMP properties. allocation Authority re. Environmental current strategy and Parker survey The site is occupied by a large profile clad warehouse and an amendment trunk road Health re. could be office building which are becoming dilapidated and would be access noise/pollution considered increasingly hard to let; the site has recently suffered required issues under new Local considerable occupancy voids, the office block is only 15% Plan occupied. The owners of the site are struggling to find long term occupiers. There are questions as to the viability of this site for continued commercial use. There are questions as to whether the continued operation of this site is compatible with adjacent uses (residential on southern site boundary). The site should not be retained for employment (NPPF para.22 refers). In terms of location this site is immediately opposite Honywood Community School and is within walking distance of other schools and shops and facilities. Colne Road is also a public transport corridor. COGG180 COG6 N/A Coggeshall Land at West Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Systemafter Ltd Rob Snowling, Pigeon Ltd. 25 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium - Low Majority Access from FP17/PROW Individual TPOs Gentle gradient Low probability Soakaway Grade II listed Archaeological Bte11 Unknown None The total site area is 25 ha, which 9.4ha is residential, 0.5ha An outline and 15/01271/OUT No N/A 127 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A West: Land at Street Service Village Pigeon Land informal 4e Western Road 72_17 and and Group TPO (Zone 1) buildings at significance not Infill area shown employment, 9ha of community woodland, 6.1ha of full planning and boundary included in Highfields Investment recreation, FP50/PROW south eastern Highfields Farm known SMR adj Ambridge greenspace. As for a huosing trajectory, Year 1 - 2016/17 - application have 15/01272/FUL amendment current strategy managemnt trunk road 72_50 cross the corner of site. adj. 8647/8648/864 Road 10 units, Year 2 2017/18 - 35 units, 2018/19 40 units, year 4 been submitted. (To be would be could be Ltd site 9/8689/8791/87 2019/20 42 units. Planning applications have been submitted determined) required considered 92 which are supported by a full range of techincal appraisals under new Local that demonstrate that the site is suitable for development, that Plan is is available and that development in the manner proposed is achievable. COGG181 COG1 & N/A The Honeywood Land inside Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Owners Mr Richard N/A 20.6 Secondary Previously Countryside, Medium (C1) Access from FP21/PROW None No significant Low probability None Archaeological None The proposal The cornerstone of the Honywood Project is the need to None N/A No N/A 440 Y Y Y Development Seek advice Education Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Part of larger COG4 Project Coggeshall Service Village consortium: Ramsey, School, playing Developed Land residential, Colne Road, 72_21 crosses gradient, site (Zone 1) significance not involves the replace the existing school buildings which are out of date and boundary from authority would included in site submitted bypass, east of Marks Hall Land Agent fields and and Greenfield trunk road, access from the site falls to west to known SMR provision of new not fit for purpose. The project involves an enabling amendment Environmental need to support current strategy under Cfs village Trust, Essex Marks Hall Agricultural school, Tey Road. FP54/PROW Robins Brook 8794 school buildings development of up to 440 houses to fund the new school. would be Health re. the proposal could be County Council, Estate Land industrial Footpath/cyclew 72_54 southern and rises to to replace the The project will deliver other community benefits including required noise/pollution considered the Potter ay links to boundary (r/o St north existing school. improvements to the A120/Colne Road junction and issues under new Local Family/Richard Tilkey road and Nicholas Way) Essex County improvements to the Marks Hall Estate. The proposal also Plan Potter and St Nicholas Council does not includes land to the north of the A120 for use as school Ardencrest Ltd. Way support the playing fields and land adjacent to Tey Road. proposals Coggeshall has a wide range of shops, services and community facilities and has good transport links. As such it is a sustainable location for development. Phase 1 - new junction to Colne Road, and A120 junction improvements. This would enable the development of new residential areas to the north of the existing school and residential area. Phase 2 - the new school and new residential development to the west of it. Once the new school is open the existing school site will be redeveloped for residential use.

COGG182 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites C/o Agent Mr Graham Mr Andrew 17.2 Farmland, single Greenfield Countryside Medium (C1) Colchester PROW through None Gentle Low probability Existing None Unknown Unknown None It is anticipated that the development can commence quickly None N/A No N/A 500 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A B1024, Service Village Ellis Dutton building for Road site (Zone 1) and can build up to a contribution of circa 75 to100 dwellings boundary included in Colchester commercial per year (including affordable homes). The site has been put amendment current strategy Road east of St premises, forward as a 30.22 Hectare (74.68 acre) development. It is would be could be Peters Road residential believed that this is of a scale to more than justify the required considered dwelling provision of a new primary school of up to 2FE. under new Local Plan The vendors and the Developer are flexible and are willing to explore a smaller scheme if it is considered by all parties that there are greater benefits to be gained in terms of sustainability and in the interests of good planning.

Consequently we request that consideration when assessing this site consideration is given to the differing scales of development that this site could provide.

COGG183 N/A N/A Land south of N/A Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Key No Call for Sites C/o Agent Mr Graham Mr Andrew 13.7 Farmland, single Greenfield Countryside/re Medium - Low 2f Colchester None None Gentle Low probability Existing None Unknown Unknown None As above None N/A No N/A As Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A B1024 Service Village Ellis Dutton building for sidential Road (Zone1) above boundary included in Colchester commercial amendment current strategy Road (east of premises, would be could be Feering Road) residential required considered dwelling under new Local Plan COGG506 COG21X N/A Dutch Nursery, N/A Coggeshall Coggeshall Countryside No Call for Sites Dutch Nursery Lawrie Dutch Nursery 3.3 Garden centre, Previously Countryside Medium/Low 3a/3b West Street None None Slopes toward Rear of site Existing Listed buildings Unknown None Access rights The Dutch Nursery site is brownfield and semi derelict on the None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A West Street Winter, retail and Developed Land and residential river Zone 2 and 3 adjacent to site fringe of the village. Mixed scheme suggested to rejuvenate boundary for mixed use Lawrie Winter business units the site and to secure some 50 jobs on the site. amendment Architecture, would be Design required Studio, Dutch Nursery, Great North Road, Brookmans Park, Hertfordshire, AL9 6ND

Page 6 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

N/A COG3 N/A N/A Land at Grange Coggeshall Coggeshall Adjacent Other No Site Allocations Nigel Agg, N/A N/A 3.8 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 3d Access could be No public None Flat Low probability None Archaeological None Unknown N/A None N/A No N/A 15 Y Y Y Development Extension of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not included in Not submitted in Farm, Kelvedon Hamlet Village and Strategic Land Land and residential taken from footpaths (Zone 1) significance not boundary ribbon ADMP would Cfs REMOVED Road Development Assets Kelvedon Road through site. known SMR amendment development have extended Not included in Management Manager, Taylor 8803 would be ribbon ADMP would Plan Wimpey UK Ltd required development. have extended Site not ribbon resubmitted in development Cfs.

COLE184 N/A N/A Land South of N/A Colne Engaine The Colnes Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Not proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed REMOVED - St Andrews Village for housing for housing Not proposed Cemetery for housing COLE185 N/A N/A Land ad The N/A Colne Engaine The Colnes Countryside No Call for Sites Mrs Barbara N/A N/A 0.06 Garden Land Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A4) Access from None None Flat Low Probability Adjacent Grade None None This is a perfect site for a family house. The plot is a very None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED - Grove Sewell and residential sensitivity to Pebmarsh Road (Zone 1) II listed The small piece of a paddock. It provided good, safe access, is amendment threshold threshold Below threshold Pebmarsh Road change) Grove not overlooked and does not overlook other properties, cars would be will be parked off the road. There is room for a good garden. required It has a house to the left, a stable to the right (standing in the paddock - opposite way from highway). It is/will be almost invisible from the road as there are small trees and a hedge on that side of the site. I am aware that the site is in the countryside but it is a perfect site (small but convenient) for a family who would enjoy it I am sure. The land is not used for anything else. COLE186 COL1 N/A Land at Brook N/A Colne Engaine The Colnes Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr George Mr Andy N/A 0.6 Paddock Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A4) Access from FP34/PROW No Land slopes up Low Probability None None None None The site is in a sustainable location within the built up area The existing PROWs on the None N/A No N/A 8 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Street (Between Village Courtauld Butcher, and residential sensitivity to Brook Street 73_34 western to the west (Zone 1) within walking distance to the limited public transport that site boundaries would be boundary included in no. 25/29) Associate change) boundary, serves the village. maintained to ensure local amendment current strategy Partner, Strutt FP35/PROW The site is actually within walking distance of the Church of residents continue to enjoy would be could be and Parker 73_35 eastern England Colne Engaine Primary School (600m). The village access to the countryside to required considered boundary hall at Station Road, associated play area and village shop at the south. Having regard to all under new Local Church Street/Station Road are also within easy walking these factors, development of Plan distance. Paragraph 34 of the National Planning Policy the site would not result in an Framework (NPPF) accepts that the rural areas may not unacceptable intrusion into the benefit from access to all or frequent sustainable transport countryside. modes and it is necessary to consider proposals for The Local Nature Reserve development in such locations against paragraphs 28 and 55 follows the route of the footpath of the NPPF. These refer to the need for housing to enhance and brook on the opposite side and maintain the vitality of the rural community. and north side of Brook Street Drg. SC05 demonstrates that a modest low density and will not be directly affected development of the site would be in keeping with the form and by development of this site. layout or nearby residential areas, notably Shellcroft to the Drg. SC03 illustrates a north. The development, given the size of the site, its generous landscape buffer to frontage to the road, depth and suggested layout would not the brook on the eastern side to represent backland development. The existing built up area of provide for the retention of a the village adjoins the site on 3 sides. The character and landscape corridor. context for the site, as illustrated on Drg. SC02, is that of As part of any development, it existing built development along Brook Street and the site is accepted that contributions appears as a gap in an otherwise built up area in that context. would be necessary to assist Whilst views to the countryside south of Brook Street would local primary school capacity. be affected the layout density, design and landscaping Drg SCO5 demonstrates that a illustrated on Drg. SC05 suggest the development can be development would be able to assimilated within the core of the village without significant meet BDC’s normal access, harm. parking and amenity space standards, The development would provide an opportunity to provide affordable housing as part of development.

COLE187 COL2 N/A Land at Brook N/A Colne Engaine The Colnes Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr George Mr Andy N/A 0.75 Former farm Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A4) Access from FP34/PROW None Gently slopes Eastern portion Currently to None None None Access rights for The site is in a sustainable location adjacent to the built up Drg SC03 demonstrates that a None N/A No N/A 6 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Farm Village Courtauld Butcher, buildings and residential sensitivity to Station Road 73_34 and northwards of site Flood existing brook to 22 Station Road area within walking distance to the limited public transport that low density development boundary included in Associate currently in use change) FP35/PROW Zone 2 the east serves the village. involving the replacement of a amendment current strategy Partner, Strutt for part 73_35 western The site is actually within walking distance of the Church of large unsightly At cost farm would be could be and Parker domestic and northern England Colne Engaine Primary School (600m). The village building and incorporating a required considered storage boundaries hall at Station Road, associated play area and village shop at landscape buffer to northern under new Local Church Street/Station Road are also within easy walking and western boundaries would Plan distance. Paragraph 34 of the National Planning Policy enhance the appearance of the Framework (NPPF) accepts that the rural areas may not area and mitigate impact on the benefit from access to all or frequent sustainable transport countryside beyond. modes and it is necessary to consider proposals for As part of any development, it development in such locations against paragraphs 28 and 55 is accepted that contributions of the NPPF. These refer to the need for housing to enhance would be necessary to assist and maintain the vitality of the rural community. local primary school capacity. It is acknowledged that the EA Flood Maps show a small portion of the eastern part of the site as falling within Flood Zone 2, principally affecting the existing buildings on the site. A Flood Risk Assessment will therefore be necessary to demonstrate that the suggested development shown on Drg SC03 will not be subject to flooding and/or will be suitably protected. Drg SC03 demonstrates that a modest low density development of around 6 dwellings, re-using three of the existing farm buildings (subject to FRA) would respect local character and fit comfortably on the site in accordance with BDC’s normal space, access and parking standards. The opportunity exists to provide an affordable housing unit as part of the development.

COLE188 Includes N/A Land east of N/A Colne Engaine The Colnes Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr George Mr Andy N/A 11.4 Agricultural Greenfield 0 Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Proposed for Larger extent COL3 Bluebridge Town Courtauld Butcher, Land proposed for employment submitted in Cfs Industrial Estate Associate housing REMOVED not Partner, Strutt proposed for and Parker housing

COLE507 COL4 N/A Land at N/A Colne Engaine The Colnes Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mrs Sonya Mr Martin N/A 0.59 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A4) Access from FP36/PROW None Relatively Flat Low Probability Soakaways None None None We are proposing a linear form of development in keeping None None No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smaller extent Pebmarsh Road Village Taylor Howe, Land and residential sensitivity to Pebmarsh Road 73_36 south- (Zone 1) with the local form and character, infill development between boundary included in submitted in Cfs Architectural change) eastern existing residential properties on a vacant site. Opposite amendment current strategy Technician, boundary playing field. Existing footpath retained down side of would be could be Peter Codling development. All services available either on site (foul sewer) required considered Architects Ltd or in close vicinity. Good links to the main village and under new Local facilities. Plan N/A N/A 14 Ex Haulage yard N/A Colne Engaine The Colnes Other Village Yes Planning Mr James Lang N/A N/A 0.2 Redundant Previously Residential (Relatively high (A4) Access from Mill None None Slight Low Probability Bte91 - N/A Planning 95/00275/FUL No Start made on 5 Y Y Y Building Site has 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in at 1 Mill Lane Permission haulage yard Developed Land sensitivity to Lane (Zone 1) Foundries, iron Permission site, access Regulations planning Cfs change) and steel works road Initial Notice permission for received 2014. housing Discharge of conditions application 2014. N/A N/A 23 Redundant N/A Colne Engaine The Colnes Other Village Yes Planning Oak Home Mr Michael N/A 0.3 Redundant Previously Residential (Relatively high (A4) Access from Mill None None Site rises to NE Low Probability N/A Planning 14/00565/FUL Yes 3 Completions 5 Y Y Y Site has 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in builders yard Permission Developments Bowler, builders yard Developed Land sensitivity to Lane from road (Zone 1) Permission in monitoring planning Cfs Church Street Ltd Architectural change) yr. ending permission for & Planning 31.3.15 housing Services GRSA269 RAY7 N/A Land centred on Andrewsfield Countryside Rayne Countryside No SHLAA 2010 Andrewsfield Mr Richard N/A 910 Agricultural/busi Previously Countryside (Moderate to (B13) Various Yes Woodland, Plateau Flood Zone 1 Various Listed building Andrewsfield Former airfield Not significant Initial potential 3000-3500, potential further 3500 to 4000. None None No None 7500 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Cross border Saling Airfield New Settlement New Settlement Mabb, Mabb ness/Gravel Developed Land high sensitivity including lakes and (Majority) WW2 airfield is poor quality amendment included in site, some parts between Consortium Planning extraction and Greenfield to change) potential for hedgerows agricultural land would be current strategy in Uttlesford Stebbing and new A120 required could be District Rayne, access. considered Braintree under new Local Plan LIST339 LIS1 N/A Stafford Park, International Countryside Stour Valley Countryside No SHLAA 2010 Redding Park Mr Andrew N/A 32 Industrial Previously Countryside (Relatively high (A2) Vehicular x 2 None SSSI River Relatively level Flood Zone 2 Existing drains None None Ground The site has been It should be noted that part of the site is within Babergh None 15/00565/OUT No Application 100 N N Y FRA would be Contamination Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Cross border Liston Flavours and North Development Hodgson Warehouse Developed Land sensitivity to Stour on site contamination subject to EIA District however the proposed houses are all in Braintree pending submitted required to be addressed included in site, some parts Fragrances Site Company Ltd Associate accommodation change) from former land screening for District. The proposed development which has been subject to consideration current strategy, in Babergh Director, fill area and residential EIA screening seeks to deliver approximately 100 homes, PDL, could be District Savills (UK) within existing development. retirement flats and a community building on the footprint of considered Ltd building the former factory and the remediation of the land and river under new Local structures area which will offer significant environmental improvement Plan compared to the current situation which could allow the former factory buildings to be used for B1, B2 and B8 uses at any level of intensity without the prospect of any environmental remediation. CRESS189 N/A N/A Braintree N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Main Yes Call for Sites 1.6 0 Site proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Promoted for REMOVED Garden Centre Cressing Town for employment employment proposed for Cressing Road, use employment Braintree CRESS190 N/A N/A Adj The N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr L Drory + N/A N/A 0.8 Mown Meadow Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B18) The Street None None Flat Low probability Existing Adj None Unknown None With the industrial units and all the main services just the None None No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Vicarage, The Cressing Village others and residential high sensitivity (Zone 1) Conservation other side of Buttons Lane I consider there would be no boundary included in Street, Cressing to change) Area objection to development of Shardloe's amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan CRESS191 N/A N/A Land on the N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Richard N/A Mr Robert Scott 14.773 Farmed Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 2b Mill Lane, None None Generally flat Low probability Existing None None Unknown None We would be prepared to discuss the possibility of improving None None None N/A 250 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A west side of Mill Cressing Village French and residential Bulford Lane (Zone 1) Cressing Station car parking along with a safe way for boundary included in Lane pedestrians to access the station from the existing residential amendment current strategy area as part of our development. We will be engaging with the would be could be local parish to see if they have any requirements for required considered community facilities that would benefit the local community. under new Local We believe that 10 acres plus could be made available for Plan recreational/country park purposes and will raise this during our discussions. CRESS192 CRE12 part N/A Land east of Mill N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mrs Julie Alen N/A Mr Robert Scott 4.608 Farmed Greenfield Residential Medium 4a The Westerings On north west None Flat Low probability Existing None None Unknown None We are also in control of the site west of Mill Lane and would None None None N/A 125 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Lane Cressing Village and and Mill Lane boundary (Zone 1) be prepared to discuss the possibility of improving Cressing boundary included in countryside Station car parking as part of our development. We will be amendment current strategy engaging with the local parish to see if they have any would be could be requirements for community facilities that would benefit the required considered local community. under new Local Plan CRESS193 CRE12 part Land between Tye Green Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr David Earey Mr Richard Mr Mike 13.56 Agricultural Greenfield Residential Medium - Low 4a Off Braintree None N/A Relatively Flat Low probability Existing Adj grade II SMR6435 and None None It is submitted that the new Local Plan must ensure that the None None No N/A 300 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Braintree Road Cressing Cressing Village and Son Mabb Lambert, and Road (Zone 1) listed building SMR6436 most sustainable options for development are achieved. Tye amendment and included in and Mill Lane Countryside countryside Green represents a substantial opportunity site which has development current strategy Properties (UK) greater sustainability credentials than many of the other boundary would could be Ltd options being presented. be required considered under new Local Plan CRESS195 CRE18X N/A Ivy Cottage, N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Brevan Homes Mr Mark Brevan Homes 0.34 Dwelling and Previously Haulage/emplo N/A Urban Existing None None Flat Low probability TBC None None None None Given the density of development of ten dwelling, and type of None None None N/A 10 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Long Green Cressing Town Ltd C/O Agent Jackson Limited associated Developed Land yment/resideni (Zone 1) development proposed of small starter homes, it is considered boundary included in curtilage tal/Hotel that this will meet the objectives of the Core Strategy for the amendment current strategy provision of residential development, assist in the provision of would be could be affordable housing for the District and is a viable and required considered appropriate use in planning terms given the nature of the site. under new Local The proposer again includes the provision of the footway to Plan Galleys Corner in this submission and s106 contributions as previously required for the hotel permission and as required by a market residential housing scheme, will be met.

CRESS196 N/A N/A Land at Rook N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr J. R. Lang Mr Edward 0.47 Former Farm Previously Countryside (Moderate to (B18) Existing None Flat Low probability Soakaway Adjacent None None None We consider that the site could be released by a minor None None None N/A 2 N Y Y Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Hall Cressing Village Gittins Yard Developed Land and residential high sensitivity (Zone 1) Cressing amendment to the Cressing Settlement boundary to include threshold threshold below threshold and Greenfield to change) Conservation development in the vicinity of Rook Hall. Area

Page 7 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

Status Availability has been year supply supply year wnfield etc.) etc.) Achievability updated Site DevelopableSite In Year Site Deliverable Not within 5 within Deliverable Not Site Current Year 2015-2016 Year Current 1 2016-2017 Year 2 2017-2018 Year 3 2018-2019 Year 4 2019-2020 Year 5 2020-2021 Year 2016-2021 1-5 Years Total 2026-2031 Years In 2031-2033 Years In 2033 Post CRESS197 CRE19X N/A Holders N/A Cressing Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites Mrs C Ratcliffe N/A N/A 0.54 Scrub Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 3d B1018, also via None None Relatively flat Low probability Existing None None None None Cressing should be reconsidered as having the potential to Farmhouse was completely None None No N/A 14 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (part Farmstead site, Cressing (Returned to and residential Polecat Road (Zone 1) become a Key Service Village. Villages such as Cressing gutted by fire in July 1961. It (Permission in boundary included in CRE20X) Hawbush Green nature) via CRESS 198 (particularly with its proximity to Braintree, Stansted Airport was investigated by the police 1962 for re- amendment current strategy and Witham with the main rail line that are part of local as arson. It is not agricultural erection of would be could be networks of settlements would provide a more balanced field and is not in agricltural agricultural required considered spread of housing allocations and key service centres through produciton (It never has been). workers dwelling under new Local out the district. Hawbush Green has the added advantage of Further more according to (For a worker Plan its proximity to Cressing Railway Station. DEFRA guidance, it cannot be on Holders Fallow Land as it is not arable Farm) (As advised by Strutt and destroyed by Parker). So, the site has been fire - This unused since 1961. permission was never implemented and has now lapsed, it is likely to have very limited weight. CRESS198 CRE20X N/A Holders N/A Cressing Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites Mrs C Ratcliffe N/A N/A 4.65 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 3d Polecat Road None None Relatively flat Low probability Existing None None None None Cressing should be reconsidered as having the potential to None None No N/A 116 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Farmstead Cressing and residential and B1018 (Zone 1) become a Key Service Village. Villages such as Cressing boundary included in Hawbush Green which abunds a (particularly with its proximity to Braintree, Stansted Airport amendment current strategy (B1018) made up public and Witham with the main rail line that are part of local would be could be walkway with networks of settlements would provide a more balanced required considered two dropped spread of housing allocations and key service centres through under new Local berb entrances out the district. Hawbush Green has the added advantage of Plan to the site. its proximity to Cressing Railway Station.

CRESS199 CRE1 (part N/A Land between N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Miss Stephie Ms Hilary Hastingwood 0.4 Scrub Greenfield Countryside N/A Urban B1018/Braintre None None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None This is a sustainable site that is suitable for development, it is None None No N/A 12 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A CRE14) Leyfield & Cressing Village Joslin Lock Developments and residential e Road (Zone 1) available and deliverable, as the owner is keen to sell the boundary included in Derrygowna, Ltd site. The availability of access to public transport and higher amendment current strategy Braintree Road order facilities renders Tye Green a sustainable village which would be could be should continue to have modest growth to ensure its existing required considered facilities are sustained. under new Local Plan

CRESS200 CRE14 part N/A Land at N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr John N/A N/A 0.25 Fallow Land Greenfield Countryside N/A Urban Braintree Road None None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None The Council will be aware that a separate parcel of land (ref. None None No N/A 4 N Y Y Development Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED "Leyfield" Cressing Village Athanasiadis and residential (Zone 1) CRE1) has been promoted by the landowner. Although the boundary threshold threshold below threshold Braintree Road, site the subject of this submission is suitable for development amendment Tye Green in its own right, this site owner would be willing and able to would be work with the adjacent landowner (of parcel CRE1) to create required a comprehensive development if this would be preferred by the Council in land use planning terms.

CRESS201 CRE2Malt N/A Land at N/A Cressing Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Matthew Mr Robert N/A 2.95 Employment Previously Countryside (Moderate to (B18) Polecat Road None None Flat Low probability Existing None None Unknown None A failure to recognise the environmental benefits of re- None Noe No N/A 100 N Y Y Spatial strategy Current use Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Appletree Farm, Cressing Morton, Warrell Pomery Developed Land and residential high sensitivity (Zone 1) development and a decision to not allocate the site as an amendment needs to included in Polecat Road Morton & Co Ltd to change) employment policy area leaves the site in a piece meal rather would be relocate current strategy than comprehensive fashion and generates conflicts with required could be neighbouring uses. considered under new Local Plan CRESS202 CRE16 N/A Land south of N/A Cressing Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites 5 0 Site proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Proposed for REMOVED Millennium Way Cressing for retail use retail proposed for retail CRESS203 CRE17 N/A Land south of N/A Cressing Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Kieran Mr Peter 1.24 Fallow land Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 3a B1018 Adjacent None Flat Low Probability TBC None None Unknown Not fully known at The proposals offer a complementary solution to Braintree None None No N/A 31 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (approx.) Fowlers Farm Cressing Rushe Williams (Zone 1) this stage town centre aspirations and could deliver a significant boundary included in Roundabout quantum of housing, employment floorspace, public realm amendment current strategy improvements, connectivity and promoting sustainability by would be could be better utilising an established public transit link, and making required considered more efficient use of existing road and rail infrastructure. under new Local Plan

CRESS204 CRE4A/B N/A Land south of Land to the Cressing Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Kieran Mr Peter 69.33 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 1c, 1e, Various Yes TPO Sloping Mostly Flood TBC None Unknown Unknown Not fully known at The proposals offer a complementary solution to Braintree None None No N/A 1725 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A CRESS205 A120 West and north and west Cressing Rushe Williams 7a, 2a Zone 1, parts this stage town centre aspirations and could deliver a significant amendment and included in CRESS206 East of Railway of Tye Green near river 2 and quantum of housing, employment floorspace, public realm development current strategy 3 improvements, connectivity and promoting sustainability by boundary would could be better utilising an established public transit link, and making be required considered more efficient use of existing road and rail infrastructure. under new Local Plan CRESS210 CRE9 part N/A Land at Ashes N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mrs C Ratcliffe Mr Richard N/A 2.5 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 10b Ashes Road No None Flat Low probability TBC Grade II listed None identified. Unknown None Development in Cressing should be reconsidered due to its None None No N/A 30 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Farm, Ashes Cressing Village Clews (Zone 1) buildings on Potential crop sustainability. amendment and included in Road adjacent site mark of field development current strategy (Off Lanham boundary. boundary would could be Green Road), be required considered three listed under new Local buildings at Plan Ashes Farm. CRESS211 CRE5 part N/A North of N/A Cressing Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Andrew Mr Paul N/A 28 Agricultural/Equ Greenfield Countryside Medium 3c Braintree Road None None Flat Low probability TBC Grade II Listed Unknown Unknown None None None None No N/A 700 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Braintree Road Cressing Morton Walker estrian/ (Zone 1) building on site boundary included in & South of farmstead and amendment current strategy Ashes Farm buildings would be could be required considered under new Local Plan CRESS213 CRE7 N/A Land south of N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr John Pease Mr Ian Reilly Mr Karl 1.95 Former car Previously Countryside Medium - Low 3d Ashes Road. PROW 74-8 is none Flat Low Probability TBC None Unknown Unknown None The precise nature of the potential development will be None None None N/A 40 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Ashes Road Cressing Village Pickering park, equestrian Developed Land and residential The Street, adjacent the (Zone 1) considered as the planning process progresses and we are boundary included in use. and Greenfield Lanham Green southern and willing to consider any issues or suggestions which the amendment current strategy Road. eastern Council may have. would be could be boundary of the required considered site under new Local Plan

CRESS214 CRE7 N/A Smaller area N/A Cressing Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr John Pease Mr Ian Reilly Mr Karl 0.5 Former car Previously Countryside Medium - Low 3d Ashes Road. PROW 74-8 is None Flat Low Probability TBC None Unknown Unknown None The precise nature of the potential development will be None None None N/A 15 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A land south of Cressing Village Pickering park. Developed Land and residential The Street, adjacent the (Zone 1) considered as the planning process progresses and we are boundary included in Ashes Road and Greenfield Lanham Green southern and willing to consider any issues or suggestions which the amendment current strategy Road. eastern Council may have. would be could be boundary of the required considered site under new Local Plan

CRESS508 Includes N/A Ashes Farm N/A Cressing Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites C Ratcliffe N/A N/A 24.7 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 10b Lanham Green Yes PROW 36 None Gentle slope Low Probability Existing Two listed Yes None Wayleaves to Could be reconsidered as having the potential to become a None None None N/A 600 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (Includes part CRE9 North Cressing Road, Ashes (Zone 1) buildings at pylons Key Service Village. Villages such as Cressing (particularly amendment and included in CRESS210) Road/Long Ashes Farm with its proximity to Braintree, Stansted Airport and Witham development current strategy Green with the main rail line) that are part of local networks of boundary would could be settlements would provide a more balanced spread of housing be required considered allocations and Key Service Centres throughout the district. under new Local Ashes Farm has the added advantage of its proximity to Plan Cressing Railway Station and the Cressing Rail Loop.

CRESS509 Includes N/A Ashes Farm N/A Cressing Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites C Ratcliffe N/A N/A 40.9 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 3b Lanham Green Yes PROW 4 None Gentle slope Low Probability Existing None Yes None Wayleaves to Could be reconsidered as having the potential to become a None None None N/A 1000 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (Includes part CRE19X/CR South Cressing Road, Ashes and 7 (Zone 1) pylons Key Service Village. Villages such as Cressing (particularly amendment and included in CRESS198) E20X Road/Long with its proximity to Braintree, Stansted Airport and Witham development current strategy Green with the main rail line) that are part of local networks of boundary would could be settlements would provide a more balanced spread of housing be required considered allocations and Key Service Centres throughout the district. under new Local Ashes Farm has the added advantage of its proximity to Plan Cressing Railway Station and the Cressing Rail Loop.

EARC215 EAR16 N/A Peeks Corner, N/A Earls Colne The Colnes Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Patrick N/A 0.4 Scrub Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 4g Tey Road Adjacent None Yes Low Probability Existing None None None No The site had a cottage on it until 1964. None None None N/A 5 N N N Development Pylons run over Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Tye Road Morison (Zone 1) boundary site. included in amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan EARC216 N/A N/A Adj Lowefields, N/A Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Robert Mr Stephen N/A 0.81 Agricultural land Greenfield Residential Medium - Low 4f Tey Road None None Generally flat Low probability Existing None None None None The site comprises a gently sloping aspect with rural views to None N/A No N/A 12 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Tey Road, Earls Service Village Prestney Knight and (Zone 1) the Colne Valley which lends itself to residential development. boundary included in Colne countryside The land adjoins existing housing to the northern and north amendment current strategy eastern sides. Tey Road is a quiet land leading from the built would be could be up area of Earls Colne into the rural area of the Colne Valley. required considered Further residential development would not cause an incursion under new Local into the countryside. Plan The site provides a suitable site for a moderate number of residential units. Vehicular access will be retained through the land fronting Tey Road for possible future use of the land to the south west. The Remainder of the field to the south west side is in the same ownership and could provide additional space for further numbers of residential units in the future.

EARC217 EAR4 N/A 42 Halstead Land east of Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Sam Cook Mr Andrew N/A 1.4 A1/B1/B2/B8 Previously Countryside Medium - Low 2e/urban Access from None None Flat Low probability Existing Adjacent None Historic Landfill Current use Ideal for residential, as existing residential to east and north None N/A No N/A 38 Y N Y Current use Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Larger area Road, Earls Halstead Road, Service Village Crayston, Developed Land and residential Halstead Road (Zone 1) conservation Site needs to relocate of site. Opposite Millennium Green - designated for village needs to boundary included in submitted in Cfs Colne eastern end Fenn Wright area leisure use. Good main road access to Colchester and relocate amendment current strategy than shown in Halstead. Bus stops within 30 metres of site. Secluded site - would be could be SHLAA2010 low visual impact. Existing business on site needs to relocate required considered - will remain in this area. Site has well defined boundaries under new Local and landscaping. Plan

EARC218 Includes N/A Site situated N/A Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Various Mr David N/A 3.2 Residential/Gar Previously Countryside Medium - Low / 4f/urban Site situated PROW 34 TPO and group Flat Low probability Existing None None None None Site is not in agricultural use, and it relates to the built up area The site is adjoining an existing None None No N/A 60 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A EAR22X between Service Village Smith den/ Developed Land and residential urban between adjacent TPO's on site (Zone 1) of Earls Colne, the site is not intrusive into open good quality development boundary and any boundary included in and EAR17 Coggeshall Amenity & and Greenfield Coggeshall agricultural land and will provide much needed additional alterations to include these amendment current strategy Road and Tey Grazing Road and Tey housing. sites should be regarded as a would be could be Road Road, Earls rounding off. required considered Colne, under new Local Colchester, Plan Essex EARC219 N/A N/A Land R/O De N/A Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Robin N/A N/A 3.9 Agricultural Greenfield Residential Medium - Low 2c Station Road None on site None Flat Low probability Existing None None None No I would like to see a mixture of residential, social, and self None None No N/A 97 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Vere Road. Part Service Village Waters and and possibly De (Zone 1) build housing on this site. I would be prepared to consider boundary included in Colne Green countryside Vere Road other uses i.e. live/work, and a contribution to local services, amendment current strategy Farm i.e. Earls Colne primary school. would be could be required considered under new Local Plan EARC220 N/A N/A The Timber N/A Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Richard N/A N/A 0.299 Scrub Greenfield Residential Medium - Low 3c Burrows Road Adjacent None Largely flat Low probability Existing None None None None The site is very well placed. Adjacent to all services and None N/A No N/A 5 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Dump, Burrows Service Village Cromack and golf (Zone 1) transport links. Earls Colne is a busy village, it has a boundary included in Road, Earls course recreation facility second to none, including a private air field. amendment current strategy Colne East connections to road and rail. A very pleasant place to would be could be reside. required considered under new Local Plan EARC221 EAR18 N/A Land east of Land East of Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr A Bonnett Steven Butler Crest Nicholson 2.1 Paddock/ B1 Previously Residential Medium - High 3h Adjacent 23 FP19/PROW None Slight drop to Low probability Adjacent None None None from Monks Approx. 40 units depending on size, potential to include older None N/A No N/A 40 Y Y Y Development Current use Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Monks Road, Monks Road Service Village Eastern offices and light Developed Land and golf Monks Road 75_19 adj the north of (Zone 1) conservation Road persons accommodation boundary needs to included in Earls Colne industrial, B8 and Greenfield course northern approx. 5m area and Grade amendment relocate current strategy storage and boundary and II listed 97 High would be could be dwelling unit cross part of Street required considered site under new Local Plan EARC222 EAR2 N/A Land at Station Colne Valley Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs Smith Mr Michael N/A 0.5 Grazing Greenfield Countryside, Medium - Low 3b Access from FP15/PROW None Gentle gradient Low probability Adjacent None None None This site is owned by the proprietors of Colne Valley Golf None N/A No N/A 14 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (smaller area Road, Earls Golf Club Service Village Wright, golf course, Station Road 75_15 opposite (Zone 1) conservation Club. It is entirely surplus to their requirements. The site is boundary included in submitted than Colne Practice Holmes & Hills residential site area. divorced from the golf course itself. For a number of years, amendment current strategy previously Ground, Station LLP the site has been little used other than for occasional grazing. would be could be submitted) Road The disposal of this land for residential purposes would assist required considered in ensuring the future viability of the golf course itself, which is under new Local a significant asset to the village. Plan

EARC223 EAR2 N/A Land South of Colne Valley Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs Smith Mr Michael N/A 5.3 Grazing Greenfield Countryside, Medium - Low 3b Access from FP15/PROW None Gentle gradient Low probability Adjacent None None None This site is owned by the proprietors of Colne Valley Golf None N/A No N/A 143 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Riverside Golf Club Service Village Wright, golf course, Station Road 75_15 opposite (Zone 1) conservation Club. It is entirely surplus to their requirements. The site is boundary included in Business Park, Practice Holmes & Hills residential, site area. divorced from the golf course itself. For a number of years, amendment current strategy Earls Colne Ground, Station LLP industrial the site has been little used other than for occasional grazing. would be could be Road There is some residential development on part of the site to required considered the south-west and a substantial industrial complex to the under new Local north. whilst the owners are content to offer all of the site for Plan residential development, they would equally be willing to consider a smaller development if that was considered more appropriate and in line with the Council's policies. The disposal of this land for residential purposes would assist in ensuring the future viability of the golf course itself, which is a significant asset to the village.

Page 8 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

EARC225 EAR1A 155 Land south of Land at the rear Earls Colne The Colnes Key Service Yes/No Site Allocations The Hunt Mr Stuart N/A 4.2 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - High 2f Access from None None Relatively flat Low probability Adjacent None None None This is a developable site in line with guidance in the NPPF. None N/A No N/A 78 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Halstead Road of Halstead Village and Property Trust Williamson, Land and residential Halstead Road (Zone 1) conservation In particular the site is available now, it offers a suitable boundary included in (west of Road Development AMEC E&I UK using old factory area location for development and is achievable with a realistic amendment current strategy Nonancourt Management Ltd access and to prospect that housing will be delivered in the site within 5 would be could be Way), Earls Plan the south via years. required considered Colne Thomas Bell Site access from [Halstead Road] would include under new Local Road improvements to the existing junction with Station Road, Plan traffic calming and better pedestrian crossing facilities, and would avoid creating a new access through the conservation area. The site is well located and connected which will help optimise pedestrian, cycle and vehicular links with the surround area and facilities (inc school). The site is outside the conservation area and visually well contained. The site can deliver an extension to the Doctor's Surgery car park and improve footpath links thereto, and a significant amount of Public Open Space.

EARC226 EAR5/EAR1 N/A Earls Colne N/A Earls Colne The Colnes Countryside Yes Site Allocations N/A N/A 5 0 Not proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed REMOVED 3 Business Park and for housing for residential proposed for Development use employment Management Plan EARC510 N/A N/A 21 Coggeshall N/A Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs Mr David N/A 0.62 Residential Previously Residential Medium - Low 4f Existing onto None TPO/Group TPO Flat Low probability Existing None None None None The site being put forward is not in agricultural use - its The site is adjoining an existing None N/A No N/A 10 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Road Service Village Andrew & Smith garden, and Developed Land and backland Coggeshall (Zone 1) existing use is residential. It relates to the built up area of the development boundary and any boundary included in Camilla Robb amenity and Greenfield amenity space Road village and the south-eastern boundary abuts a public footpath alterations to include these amendment current strategy which would form an established natural boundary between sites should be regarded as a would be could be residential and agricultural uses. The site is not visible, nor rounding off. required considered intrusive in to good quality agricultural land and will provide under new Local much needed additional housing. Plan

N/A EAR3 158 N/A Land between Earls Colne The Colnes Key Service Yes/No Site Allocations Mr R Long Mr A N/A 4.45 Paddocks/mead Greenfield Residential, Medium - High 3a Access from None Various group Northern half of Low probability Adjacent None None None 15/00934/OUT N/A No N/A 56 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Homefield Way Village and Hodgson, ow golf course Station Road and individual site slopes (Zone 1) conservation received boundary included in Cfs and Golf Course Development Savills (UK) TPOs on site. towards the area and Grade 17.7.15 - amendment current strategy Management Ltd River Colne II listed Colne pending would be could be Plan Valley House consideration required considered under new Local Plan N/A EAR7 N/A N/A Land at Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No SHLAA 2010 East Essex Fenn Wright N/A 1.07 Assorted Previously Countryside Medium - Low 2e/urban Existing long None None Flat Low probability None None None None None N/A No N/A 15 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Halstead Road, Service Village Hunt buildings, Developed Land and residential narrow (Zone 1) boundary included in Cfs East Essex kennels and driveway onto amendment current strategy Hunt Kennels grassed areas Halstead Road, would be could be may need required considered widening under new Local Plan N/A EAR10 N/A N/A Land adjacent Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No SHLAA 2010 Mrs B Brierly MJC N/A 0.31 Vacant land Greenfield Countryside N/A Urban Access may be None TPO 07/05 - T2 Flat Low probability Adjacent None None None None N/A No N/A 8 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in to 40 Halstead Service Village Associates and residential possible onto on northern (Zone 1) conservation boundary included in Cfs Road Halstead Road boundary area amendment current strategy if additional land would be could be ld b i d id id d N/A EAR11 AND N/A N/A Chestnuts/Coln Earls Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No SHLAA 2010 Mr C Dale N/A N/A 1.1 Residential, Previously Residential, N/A Urban Access from None None Flat Low probability Adjacent Archaeological None None None N/A No N/A 30 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in EAR12 e House Farm, Service Village commercial Developed Land commercial, Station Road (Zone 1) conservation significance not boundary included in Cfs Station Road and Greenfield golf course area and Grade known point site amendment current strategy II listed Colne SMR 8708 would be could be House required considered under new Local Plan FEER227 FEE13 N/A The Feering N/A Feering Kelvedon and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr D Shaikly N/A Lanswood Ltd 0.98 Former Previously A12 Medium 4c London Road None None Generally flat Low probability Existing None None Unknown None 0 Not proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed REMOVED Triangle London Feering depot/storage Developed Land (Zone 1) for housing for residential proposed for Road use employment FEER229 N/A N/A Land adjacent N/A Feering Kelvedon and Countryside No Call for Sites JR Crayston & 2.2 Vacant land Greenfield 0 Not proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed REMOVED to Service Feering Sons for housing for residential proposed for Station, London use employment Road FEER230 FEE10 N/A Land at Inworth N/A Feering Kelvedon and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Not Known Mr Andy Countryside 2 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 3i From Inworth PROW 13 to Some TPOs on Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None See Delivery Statement and supporting documents. None N/A No N/A 40 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Road Feering Village Butcher, and residential Road south of site boundary with (Zone 1) boundary included in Associate Kings Gardens amendment current strategy Partner Strutt would be could be and Parker required considered under new Local Plan FEER232 FEE9 N/A Land south of N/A Feering Kelvedon and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites The Crown Mr Neil Hall, N/A 80 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium 4b From London None on None Northern 2/3rds Low probability There are a Feering Archaeological None Please refer to submission report for full details of the site None N/A No N/A 880 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Site proposed Feering, west of Feering Village Estate Technical residential, Road/Coggesha safeguarding gently sloping, (Zone 1) small number of conservation significance not and proposals. amendment and included in for mixed uses A12 (between Director, mainline ll Road/New agent advises steepens in small isolated area to north, known development current strategy Coggeshall AMEC railway Lane there is a right southern part areas at risk separated from SMR8806 boundary would could be Road and New Environment of way that runs from surface site by railway be required considered Lane) & through the site water flooding. line under new Local Infrastructure Proposed Plan drainage on the site will address these issues.

FEER233 FEE4H 73 Land off London N/A Feering Kelvedon and Adjacent Other Yes/No (Smaller area to The Crown Mr Neil Hall, N/A 60 Agricultural Greenfield Business Park, Medium - Low Various Various PROW 13 & 18 None Variations within Most of None Archaeological Small part The Crown Estate Please refer to submission report for full details of the site None N/A No N/A 950 Y Y Y Development Part of site is 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 No N/A Larger extent Road Feering Village / north identified in Estate Technical A12, the site southern part is significance not Bte720 and has rights of and proposals. boundary within submitted under Countryside Site Allocations Director, countryside within Flood known Bte719 access over the amendment development Cfs than and AMEC and residential Zone 2/3 SMR8128/8176 overbridge on the would be boundary and allocated as Development Environment /8136 A12 and the required has no other FEE4H Management & Threshelfords allocations, Plan) Infrastructure Business Park remainder not has rights of included in access across current strategy Crown land to could be access the considered business park under new local from the B1023. plan N/A N/A 75 Units 1 and 2 N/A Feering Kelvedon and Countryside Yes Planning Mrs Eileen ASP N/A 0.2 Offices Previously Countryside (Low to (B19) From Domsey None None Flat Low probability None None None N/A Prior Approval 13/00005/COU No None 11 Y Y Y Site can be 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Tey Grove, Gt Feering Permission Roberts Developed Land moderate Chase (Zone 1) Not Required PA developed Cfs Domseys Farm, sensitivity to through PD Domsey Chase change) regime

FEER228 FEE6 N/A Land at Wills N/A Feering (Wills Kelvedon and Countryside No Call for Sites JR Crayston & David Maher, 1.7 Field Greenfield Residential (Low to (B19) Wills Green None None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None The land is located in close proximity to village amenities and None N/A No N/A 50 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hierarchy status Green Green) Feering Sons ASP and moderate (Zone 1) public transport links at both Feering and Kelvedon to the amendment and included in countryside; countryside sensitivity to south as well as the roadside services at junction 24 of the development current strategy Wills Green change) A12. Development of the site would represent a logical boundary would could be does not have a extension to Feering which would be appropriate in landscape be required considered development terms as the site is well contained within the existing under new Local boundary settlement pattern. Plan FEER231 Includes N/A Land West of Land to west of Feering/Marks Kelvedon and Countryside No Call for Sites Various Mr Andy N/A 240 Primarily Greenfield Countryside, (Low to (B19) Various, Various None Large majority Majority Low SUDS Various listed None None None It provides: None N/A No N/A 6000 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Liaison with Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Cross border FEE7 Marks Tey Marks Tey Tey Feering Gateway 120 Stevens, Agricultural residential, moderate primarily from relatively flat probability buildings on and A set of significant land parcels that can provide a large scale amendment and various other included in site, some parts Ltd (Promoter) Managing railway, A12 sensitivity to spur road at (Zone 1) adj site and co-ordinated solution to local need for housing, development stakeholders current strategy in Colchester Director, ASP change) new A120/A12 infrastructure and public services boundary would including could be borough, junction be required Highways considered estimate of • Certainty of delivery, form and location of development over Agency and under new Local numbers based the long term. That is, a viable, long-term alternative to Colchester BC Plan on approx. land needing multiple medium-sized sites across the region. area in Braintree district

FINC234 FIN1 N/A Prospect N/A Finchingfield Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Roy Cox N/A N/A 0.07 Garden land Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B9) Existing 29/20 None Slight Low probability Conservation None None This would be a low carbon and environmental impact build. None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Below threshold 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below Slightly smaller Cottage The Village and residential high sensitivity driveway from (Zone 1) area, adj listed Air and ground sources for energy used where possible. boundary threshold. extent submitted Green to change) Brent Hall Road buildings Local trades people will be used as much as possible amendment in Cfs including local companies. The design of the cottage will would be REMOVED blend in with the local scenery very well. required below threshold FINC235 FIN5 N/A Land adj Great N/A Finchingfield Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr K Metson, Miss Breena N/A 1.06 Agricultural Greenfield Edge of (Moderate to (B9) Access from None None Not significant Low probability Conservation None None None This site presents a unique opportunity to bring forward much None N/A No N/A 20 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smaller extent Wincey Farm, Village Mr J Ruggles & Coyle, Land village, small high sensitivity Brent Hall Road (Zone 1) area needed housing in a sustainable manner. There are no boundary included in submitted in Cfs Brent Hall Road Ms C Ruggles Planner, The scale offices to change) overriding physical constraints to the development of the site amendment current strategy JTS and it is available, suitable and achievable nor is there any would be could be Partnership obstruction to the early deliverability of this site. It is in a required considered village appropriate for development, with a good level of under new Local services, making good use of existing infrastructure, Plan supporting the existing level of services and local community and it would appear to offer a logical extension to the existing settlement boundary. It must not be lost on the Council that new homes are required in order to sustain village shops and local amenities. FOXE236 N/A N/A Land adj N/A Foxearth Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites The Brook Hall Mr John N/A 1.1 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A2) Access from None None Land rises Low Probability NE corner only None None None Foxearth would be a sustainable location for additional This will be the subject of None N/A No N/A 28 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Glebeside, North Village Farm McLarty, Land and edge of sensitivity to School Street gently to south (Zone 1) adj development. Whilst the Core Strategy does not currently discussions with providers. The boundary included in School Street Partnership National village change) conservation define the village as a key settlement for growth, it enjoys a landowner will seek to consult amendment current strategy Partner, Strutt area, Grade II range of existing services, connectivity and facilities that with the Parish Council at the would be could be and Parker Listed Glebe suggest that it should enjoy a higher status as a location that earliest stage possible to required considered Cottage land would be suitable for development. If the spatial strategy is to maximise the potential of the under new Local backs onto site consider a range of locations in accordance with the advice site’s community benefits. Plan set out in the NPPF, Foxearth should be identified to assist in This submission for Call for meeting the requirements. Moreover, the ability to provide for Sites is intended to assist BDC development would meet the objectives of the NPPF to in the identification of a suitable enhance the vitality of this rural community. medium sized strategic site at The land at School Street identified on the plan attached to Foxearth to inform the this submission provides an opportunity to deliver a modest preparation of the new Local scale housing development to meet the needs of the local Plan and contribute to housing community in a sustainable location. The site would be able to requirements. It will be subject offer about 12 homes, with the intention of meeting a local to further assessment and need for low cost 1-2 bedroom rental accommodation. There discussions with key is also the opportunity to provide space for allotments on the stakeholders as the process site, as well as open space to deliver further community and evolves. recreational benefits for the village as part of an allocation. In order to bring forward this site, it is acknowledged that further assessment and testing of local environmental and physical infrastructure capacity will be necessary including transport, utilities and ecology to confirm deliverability. It would be expected that the development would need to assist with educational, social, community and health needs associated with the development of the land.

GEST241 N/A N/A Land adj Bridge N/A Gestingthorpe Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs Peter N/A N/A 1.4 Pasture, Greenfield Countryside (Moderate (B5) From North End FP17/PROW None Slopes down to Low Probability None None None Central electricity N/A None N/A N/A N/A 10 N Y N Development Area of site adj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Flood Zone REMOVED Cottage, North North/Stour Village and Leonie grassland and residential sensitivity to Road over 97_13/FP1/PR north (Zone 1) generating board boundary dev boundary is 2/3 & pylon flood Zone 2/3 End Road Valley South Rathbone change) Belchamp Brook OW 81_1 southern part, has access rights amendment in the flood plain and pylon southern Zone 2/3 for the would be and buffer area boundary northern part maintenance of required would also be the pylon required from pylon/cables

GEST237 GES3 (part) N/A Land at North N/A Gestingthorpe Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Roger Miss Corrie N/A 0.6 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate (B5) From North End None None Relatively Flat Low Probability To existing None None None None The site is a logical extension to the main village settlement, None N/A N/A N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A End Road (adj South Spencer Newell, Corrie and residential sensitivity to Road (Zone 1) being located between existing houses and being bounded by boundary included in Pound Farm) Newell change) existing boundaries. amendment current strategy Historic The proposed use would be compatible with the use of the would be could be Buildings adjoining residential buildings along North End Road. required considered Consultancy It would be consistent with the built form of the existing under new Local settlement around it, having no greater depth of development Plan than the other buildings along North End Road, and being accessed through an existing access position. The development of the site would not involve the loss of

Page 9 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

GEST239 Part N/A Land at N/A Gestingthorpe Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Roger Miss Corrie N/A 0.04 Residential Greenfield Countryside (Moderate (B5) From Nether Hill None None Relatively Flat Low Probability To existing None None None The site is part of the historic built-up main settlement of the None 14/00988/FUL N/A N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED GES2/3 Boulders, South Village Spencer Newell, Corrie garden and residential sensitivity to (Zone 1) village. refused at boundary threshold threshold below threshold Nether Hill Newell change) The site has been residential and not been part of the appeal 2015 amendment Historic countryside for over 200 years. would be Buildings It contains no features identified within policy as being required Consultancy significant countryside features. The site character is consistent with adjoining sites within the Village Framework boundary, and the rural character of the site is jointly because of its disuse, and as a result of a hedgerow that is also characteristic of the adjoining sites within the village settlement. The previous Local Plan Inspector identified that the treatment along Nether Hill was inconsistent and should be reviewed and that the remainder of the Nether Hill settlement included in the Framework in the light of housing demand. The treatment of this individual site is still inconsistent with the treatment along Nether Hill. On none of the occasions on which this site was considered, was there a planning reason given to differentiate differently between this site and its neighbours. The proposed inclusion of the Nether Hill buildings within an extended Framework should therefore also consistently include this site within the Framework.

GEST240 N/A N/A Land south of N/A Gestingthorpe Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Roger Miss Corrie N/A 0.88 Residential Greenfield Countryside (Moderate (B5) Existing from None None Relatively Flat Low Probability To existing None None None None The site is a logical extension to the main village settlement, None N/A N/A N/A 15 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Boulders, South Spencer Newell, Corrie garden/field not and residential sensitivity to Pond Farm/ (Zone 1) being located between existing houses and being bounded by boundary included in Nether Hill Newell in cultivation change) through former existing mature boundaries. amendment current strategy Historic Boulders site The proposed use would be compatible with the use of the would be could be Buildings adjoining residential buildings along Nether Hill. required considered Consultancy It would be consistent with the built form of the existing under new Local settlement around it, having no greater depth of development Plan than the other buildings along Nether Hill, and being accessed through an existing residential access position. The development of the site would not involve the loss of valuable countryside. The land contains no features of identified landscape interest, is hidden from view and is difficult to access and use for modern arable farming. Subject to separation as proposed above, and a sympathetic domestic scale and design, the development of the site would have minimal impact on the built environment, amenity and landscape. This minimal impact should be balanced against the benefits of its contribution towards the 5-year housing need.

GOSF217 GOS8X N/A 10 New Road N/A Gosfield Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Tony Wood, N/A N/A 0.4 General light Previously Countryside (Relatively high (F2) Existing via None None Relatively Flat Low Probability None None Potential given None Site outside Gosfield village envelope but with cluster of 10 or None N/A N/A N/A 12 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hierarchy status Greenstead AR Wood industry (B2) Developed Land and residential sensitivity to Braintree Road, (Zone 1) existing/previou more dwellings. Over years number of businesses operating boundary included in countryside; Green Lawnmowers change) future access s uses from site has declined. 5 substantial buildings on site now amendment current strategy, located in group could be gained redundant. Vegetation forms significant boundary between would be PDL, could be of dwellings via New Road site and open countryside. An appropriate beneficial future required considered which does not use of the site is proposed which would be in keeping and under new Local have a enhance the surrounding residential area. The proposal Plan development would not constitute ribbon development or set a precedent boundary for consolidation or further infilling as there are no other similar sized brownfield sites in the local area. Site is considered to be in walking distance of the village and its services. There are frequent bus links and Braintree Road forms one of main links between Braintree and Halstead. We see no reason why this site should not be allocated. Hamlet policy should set a principle for the regeneration of such eyesores. GOSF242 N/A N/A Land adj N/A Gosfield Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites Gavin Stock Simon King, GWH Contracts 0.09 Residential Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (F1) From None None Relatively Flat Low Probability None None None The site in question is amenity land dedicated to Canberra None N/A N/A N/A 5 Y Y Y Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below Canberra Greenstead Individual garden and residential sensitivity to Hedingham (Zone 1) Cottage. The development would be Affordable Housing set threshold threshold Hedingham Green Architecture change) Road on the fringe of Gosfield where at present there are no Road, Gosfield affordable homes available for sale. Affordable homes would allow young people to stay in the village whereas at present they have to leave to seek affordable property. GOSF244 GOS9X N/A Land to rear of N/A Gosfield Gosfield and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Ms Diana May 07742 N/A 0.646 Small part used Previously Countryside (Relatively high (F1/A4) Access from FP16/PROW TPO group Relatively Flat Low Probability Conservation None None Access is via a I believe that the only issue which could cause some None N/A N/A N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Liaison with Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A 13/14 Park Greenstead Village 645402 as a builders Developed Land and residential sensitivity to The Street 82_16 SE 23/82 - G1 one (Zone 1) area shared track that I problems will be the access to the site. The site in part backs boundary Highways re included in Cottages Green yard, majority and Greenfield change) boundary corner of site do not own, I do on to an existing housing estate. amendment access current strategy used for grazing have the option to would be could be widen the existing required considered driveway under new Local Plan

GOSF252 GOS5 N/A Land north of Land in Gosfield Gosfield Gosfield and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Wilson Michael Crispin Kelly, 4 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (F1) Right of Way on PROW 82_11 TPO 11/78 Relatively Flat Low Probability Land drain Grade II Listed None None None The land owner has entered into lengthy discussions with the The site is unique in that is is None N/A No N/A 104 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smaller extents Meadway Greenstead Village Backhouse Calder Baylight Land - set aside woodland, sensitivity to to site from southern various trees (Zone 1) along perimeter Building and local community and has shown intent to provide large enclosed on all of its boundary included in submitted in Cfs (Option A), west Green Trust (C/o Toby Properties Ltd Gosfield Hall change) Meadway to the boundary on/Adj southern of field in which conservation benefits to the community in terms of land, infrastructure and boundaries with teh existing amendment current strategy of the Backhouse) registered south and boundary; site sits. area adj south- financial gain. The land owner owns land to the north of the woodland to the north, existing would be could be Hedingham park/garden Orange Hall registered eastern corner; existing planning envelope of the village, and would welcome residential development to the required considered Road (A1017) Lodge from the park/garden adj discussions with the district over different configurations of east and south and woodland to under new Local north. southwestern development proposals dependent of perceived benefits to teh west. The enclosure Plan corner both the district and the parish. There are no perceived provides containment and filters complications, other than planning processes and any visual impact outside the development work to deliver this proposal. Once planning sites immediate boundaties due consent is granted, development can start with successful to defensible boundaries. The financing and delivery of completed units can be anticipated proposed development would within two years. therefore have no significant impact on teh landscape and would seek to preserve the character of the village safeguarding it from further boundary encroachment to the south, east or west which is generally exposed locations that would "leak" views into the wider landscape.

GOSF253 GOS5 N/A Land north of Land in Gosfield Gosfield Gosfield and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Wilson Michael Crispin Kelly, 2 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (F1) Right of Way on FP11/PROW TPO 11/78 - T5 Relatively Flat Low Probability Land drain Conservation None None None The land owner has entered into lengthy discussions with the As above None N/A No N/A 50 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smaller extents Meadway Greenstead Village Backhouse Calder Baylight Land - set aside and sensitivity to to site from 82_11 southern southern (Zone 1) along perimeter area (small part local community and has shown intent to provide large boundary included in submitted in Cfs (Option B), west Green Trust (C/o Toby Properties Ltd residential, change) Meadway to the boundary boundary of field in which of access north benefits to the community in terms of land, infrastructure and amendment current strategy of the Backhouse) south and site sits. of Orchard financial gain. would be could be Hedingham Orange Hall Cottage), adj required considered Road (A1017) Lodge from the conservation The land owner owns land to the north of the existing planning under new Local north. area, Grade II envelope of the village, and would welcome discussions with Plan listed building the district over different configurations of development adj SE corner proposals dependent of perceived benefits to both the district and the parish.

GOSF243 N/A N/A Land between N/A Gosfield Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites Gosfield Tennis Mr Robert N/A 0.2 Partly occupied Greenfield Residential (Relatively high (F2) Access from None None Relatively Flat Low Probability None Archaeological None Entrance access The site is at present not used for any particular purpose None N/A N/A N/A 5 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hierarchy status nos 5 and 7 Greenstead Club Waters, by temporary and tennis sensitivity to Braintree Road (Zone 1) significance not rights shared with although about a quarter is let by the Tennis Club for boundary included in countryside; Braintree Road Green Secretary, allotments courts change) known two neighbours temporary allotments. The Trustees have not particular use amendment current strategy located adj Trustees of SMR6458 for the land and a small village club do not foresee any future would be could be group of Gosfield expansion of the club. However, we do wish to install required considered dwellings which Tennis Club floodlights which the development of the site would help us under new Local does not have a achieve. Plan development boundary GOSF246 GOS10X N/A Former Shell Oil N/A Gosfield Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites Colne Skips Mr Nick N/A 1.68 Former Shell Oil Previously Countryside (Relatively high (F1) Access from FP13/PROW Area TPO 1/77- Relatively Flat Low Probability The extent of None None Former oil None The land is vacant and available for immediate development. None N/A N/A N/A 20 Y Y Y Remediation Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Depot, Greenstead Davey, The Depot (Sui Developed Land and A-road sensitivity to Hedingham 82_13 adj A2 eastern (Zone 1) the former depot storage depot The main potential constraint to viability may be a need to required included in Hedingham Green JTS Generis), change) Road western boundary is drained deal with land contamination related to the previous use made current strategy, Road Partnership currently vacant boundary to the site. The site is located to the north of, and outside, the PDL, could be LLP defined development envelope of Gosfield Village. The lawful considered use is for fuel storage and distribution, which is Sui Generis under new Local (Land Use Gazetteer 3rd edition Volume 1 Land Use). Plan The identification of the Shell Oil Depot for redevelopment would be consistent with, and help promote, a number of core land-planning principles.

It would contribute to the effective use of land by reusing a site, which is not of high environmental value, that has been previously developed (brownfield land).

It could help proactively drive and support sustainable economic development in a manner which helps deliver homes, business or industrial units, infrastructure.

It could contribute to the conservation and enhancement of the natural environment. In its current state, it detracts from the character of the surrounding area and, being a previously developed site, it is of lesser environmental value.

The site has lain vacant for a number of years and the planning system needs to find a long term solution for it. If nothing is done, it will remain derelict and unkempt and the condition of the structures, thereon, will deteriorate further. The planning system needs to take a creative approach in order to enhance and improve the contribution that the site makes to the surrounding area.

GOSF247 N/A N/A Land south of N/A Gosfield Gosfield and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Watson- Mr Edward N/A 3.8 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (A4/F1) From Hall FP14/PROW Various Relatively Flat Low Probability Soakaway Conservation None None Registered The site adjoins the existing built up area of the village None N/A N/A N/A 50 Y N Y Development Parks and Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Registered REMOVED Hall Drive (adj Greenstead Village Steel Gittins, residential, sensitivity to Drive/Church 82_14 northern individual and (Zone 1) area park/garden immediately west of the Gosfield Hall Park Playing Fields and boundary gardens included in park and registered park playing field) Green Edward playground change) Road boundary (Hall group TPOs can be accessed via both Hall Drive to the north and Church amendment designation current strategy. gardens and garden Gittins & Drive) across site Road to the south. The site is of sufficient extent to would be would need to Unlikely to be Associates incorporate a landscape buffer on the interface with the required be removed included in new countryside to the west and an extension to the playing fields, Local Plan due allotments or other preferred village facilities for community to registered use to the immediate east. The envisaged capacity of the site park and garden is 50 dwellings including affordable provision. The site is status. sustainably located within walking distance of the main village facilities and services, including the Gosfield County Primary school and public transport links.

GOSF248 N/A N/A Land off Nun's N/A Gosfield Gosfield and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Watson- Mr Edward N/A 0.85 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A4) Existing field None Individual and Relatively Flat Low Probability Soakaway Adjacent None None The release of land as proposed at Gosfield would provide a None N/A N/A N/A 5 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Meadow Greenstead Village Steel Gittins, and residential sensitivity to gate off Nun's group TPOs (Zone 1) conservation small new site for five detached village houses served via a boundary included in Green Edward change) Meadow on/adj northern area private drive off Nun’s Meadow. amendment current strategy Gittins & boundary, would be could be Associates woodland TPO The site is well-related to existing village development in that required considered 19/2001 - W1 it lies to the rear of established residential dwellings fronting under new Local adj NW corner Church Road to the north and Nun’s Meadow to the east. Its Plan development would have minimal visual impact on the setting of the village subject to landscaping along its rear (southern) boundary.

The site is sustainably located within walking distance of the main village facilities and services, including Gosfield County Primary school and public transport links.

The site has good defensible boundaries in the form of existing development and a landscaping buffer would be provided along the site’s southern boundary such that its development would not cause material harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside. GOSF249 GOS1/6/11 N/A Land at Gosfield N/A Gosfield Gosfield and Countryside Yes/No Call for Sites Wicks Mr Edward Wicks 9 Rough Previously Not proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed REMOVED not X Airfield Greenstead Construction Ltd Gittins, Construction Ltd grassland - Developed Land for housing for housing proposed for Green & Hunwick Edward & Hunwick former airfield housing Engineering Ltd Gittins & Engineering Ltd Associates

Page 10 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

GOSF554 Land to the Gosfield Gosfield and Adjacent other No Call for Sites Sowar Ltd 8 Scrap Previously Residential/ed N/A N/A Hedingham Yes through site None Gentle slope Low probability SUDS Grade II listed None Likely None A design led approach thaken wuold deliver a high quality None N/A No No 35 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A north of Greenstead village yard/wood Developed Land ge of village Road/Halstead north to south (Zone 1) building developement which would enhance the village and in all boundary included in Gosfield, Green storage and Greenfield Road respects make a lasting contribution for many years to come. amendment current strategy Hedingham would be could be Road required considered under new Local Plan GRBA254 N/A N/A The Bardfield N/A Great Bardfield Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Bedlar Holdings Mrs Kay N/A 0.4 Mixed use Previously Residential/Hal (Relatively high (A5) Braintree Road No None Flat No Existing Conservation None Unknown None Four prior notification applications have been made for a Part prior N/A N/A 5 units on site 17 N Y Y Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Centre, Village Ltd Collins employment and Developed Land l sensitivity to Area and change of use from office to residential for 5 of the units on approval on COU from from heritage included in Braintree Road residential change) Adjacent to a the site. The application for Bardfield House was approved parts of the site. office to specialists current strategy Grade II* listed and the applications for the other 4 units (2, 14, 15 and 23) residential. could be building. were refused due to a planning condition on the original considered planning permission for the site. In conjunction with this under new Local submission, a pre-application meeting has been requested Plan and arranged to discuss the redevelopment of the site further.

GRBA255 N/A N/A Land south of N/A Great Bardfield Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Bluegate Hall Mr James N/A 5.82 Agricultural Greenfield Residential/Co (Relatively high (A5) Braintree Road None None Flat None Existing None None None None The site is considered suitable, achievable and available for None N/A N/A None 145 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Alienor Avenue Village Farms Limited Salmon Land untryside sensitivity to residential use and there are no insurmountable reason as to boundary included in change) why the site could not be developed. It is within sustainable amendment current strategy location and additional dwelling would help to support, would be could be maintain and enhance the village facilities. Additional required considered landscaping will screen the visual impact of the development under new Local whilst also enhancing biodiversity at the site. Overall the site Plan would allow for a development which could add to the Council's 5 years supply number promptly.

N/A N/A 84 Bushett Farm, N/A Great Bardfield Three Fields Countryside Yes Planning University of Miss C N/A 5.6 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate (B11) Existing Byway 19 None Relatively Flat Low Probability Grade II Listed None None N/A Planning 13/00012/FUL No Subsequent 5 Y Y Y Discharge of Site has 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Oxen End Permission Cambridge Anthony buildings sensitivity to adj/across (Zone 1) Barn permission for application planning planning Cfs EMBS change) access residential use pending conditions permission for consideration housing GRMA256 GRM1 N/A Adj Long Fen, N/A Great Gosfield and Other Village No Call for Sites Mr Peter N/A N/A 0.8 Garden land Greenfield Countryside (Moderate (B5) From Church None None Slopes down to Low Probability None None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Church Street Maplestead Greenstead Schwier and residential sensitivity to Street NW (Zone 1) boundary included in threshold below threshold Green change) amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan GRMA257 GRM3 N/A Land at Purls N/A Great Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Ian Johnson N/A N/A 0.24 Garden land Greenfield Countryside (Moderate (B5) From Purls Hill None None Relatively Flat Low Probability None None None None It is not overlooked and would not impact on any neighbours. None N/A No N/A 1 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Hill, east of Pink Maplestead Greenstead and residential sensitivity to (Zone 1) amendment included in threshold below threshold House Green change) would be current strategy. required Not considered to be sustainable location, unlikely to be included in new Local Plan.

GRMA259 GRM5 N/A Treeways, N/A Great Gosfield and Other Village Yes/No Site Allocations Mrs P Mr Mark N/A 0.33 Residential Previously Countryside (Moderate (B5) Existing from None None Sloping west to Low Probability None None None None The development boundary currently has a notch within an Development N/A No N/A 2 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Church Street Maplestead Greenstead and Hennessey Jackson, Developed Land and residential sensitivity to Church Street east (Zone 1) otherwise fairly regular boundary. The area currently forms boundary boundary included in threshold below threshold Green Development Mark Jackson and Greenfield change) part of an established well landscaped garden and forms amended in amendment current strategy Management Planning clearly and established curtilage to the property Treeways. ADMP would be could be Plan The access to Treeways has also been excluded in the required considered current adopted proposals map to the Local Plan. Further, the under new Local boundary between agricultural land and the village and site Plan itself is clearly defined by a high and established hedgerow. The proposal is to eliminate this notch from the currently defined envelope which lies between two existing properties.

BLAN112 BLA2 N/A The Stables, Land at the Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Tann Mr K Chitty, N/A 0.3 B1 Office Use Previously Countryside N/A Urban Access from None None of No Low Probability Soakaway None None None None The site has no significant adverse external planning impacts Planning 99/00316/COU No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Bakers Junction of and Black Town Planning Developed Land and residential London Road or significance (Zone 1) that would constitute genuine obstacles to its development. It permission for approved - COU boundary included in Lane/London Bakers Lane Notley Consultant, and Greenfield Bakers Lane is in a sustainable location, it is in single ownership, un- B1 use. of stable to amendment current strategy Road, Black and London KC Planning mortgaged and is therefore available and deliverable without offices would be could be Notley Road Black hindrance. 13/00003/COU required considered Notley PA refused and under new Local dismissed at Plan appeal - cou to C3 dwelling 14/00916/FUL refused and dismissed at appeal - cou to C3 dwelling BLAN114 BLA5 N/A Land east of Land at Great Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No Core Strategy Braintree South Gabrielle N/A 100 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside / Medium/Medium 5a/6h/5b/ Between FP1,2,4,15,17 Various TPOs No Low Probability Some areas are Listed buildings Archaeological None known The land It is considered that this site to the south of Braintree offers N/A N/A No N/A 2000 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A London Road, Notley (south of and Black Town Alliance Rowan, Land Agricultural / - Low/Low 5c London Road in site area; and Group TPO (Zone 1) highlighted at within and site shown on necessary to an ideal opportunity to meet the increased housing need in amendment and included in Great Notley A120, north of Notley Pegasus residential B1053 and byway crosses greater adjacent to site; safeguarding at deliver the the District in a sustainable location. The proposed site is development current strategy Dragnets Lane, Group Bakers Lane the site probability of cluster of listed southeast proposal is located to the south of Braintree which is the main town in the boundary would could be east of London Surface Water buildings around corner of site, controlled by the District. be required considered Road, west of Flooding. This Hayeswood details not Consortium and under new Local Church principally Farm known other landowners Plan Road/Buck Hill) relates to who have existing field previously boundaries and expressed is likely to support for the indicate ditches/ principle of existing development at agricultural this location and drainage. there is therefore not expected to be any insurmountable constraint GNBN262 GRN7X part N/A Land adj to 106 N/A Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No SHLAA 2010 Mrs Rosemary N/A N/A 0.13 Engineering Previously Residential Medium - Low 20e Cul de sac None None No Low Probability Existing None Adj Unknown None N/A None N/A No N/a 3 N Y Y Development Below threshold 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below London Road and Black Town Lawes workshops Developed Land access (Zone 1) archaeological boundary threshold Notley road amendment would be required GNBN263 GRN2 N/A Land between Land between Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No SHLAA 2010 Mr Paul Hales N/A N/A 0.98 Grazing Greenfield Residential/ba N/A Urban London Road Yes adjacent TPO Order 8/94 Falls north Low Probability No known None None None Front part of site The allocation of this site for housing would not require any Call for sites None No N/A 20 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A 114 and 126 114 and 126 and Black Town ckland westward by (Zone 1) issues within additional infrastructure provision since all mains services are boundary included in London Road, London Road Notley 7.5m development available for connection in the adjacent public highway. The amendment current strategy Great Notley boundary under settlement boundary of Great Notley would follow a clear would be could be 2014 Plan. defensible boundary and would be a natural and very logical required considered rounding of development to the west of London Road. under new Local Plan GRNO260 GRN1 N/A Land west of N/A Great Notley Great Notley Main Town No Core Strategy Countryside Ms Helen N/A 40 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/C Medium 23e A131 Yes None Generally Flat Low Probability SUDS None on site None None BDC partly own The site presents the opportunity to not only meet future Master Plan for None None Master Plan 500 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A A131 and Black Properties Rodger ountry Park (Zone 1) land to front of employment needs, but presents the ability to help meet the employment adopted. amendment included in Notley site, but are Council's newly identified housing requirements the provision growth location would be current strategy aware of of a sustainable mixed-use development. This is more and Core required could be situation. essential than ever given the significantly projected increase Strategy growth considered in housing need for the District. It is therefore considered the location under new Local wider site proposed within this site submission should be allocation Plan taken forward within the New Local Plan as a mixed use development.

N/A BLA8 N/A N/A Land at Ludham Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No SHLAA 2010 G Lanza Esq Strutt & N/A 7 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium 5a Ludham Hall FP1 adjoins the Various TPOs No Low Probability Suitable for mixed use residential None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Lane, off and Black Town Parker Land and residential Lane site (Zone 1) boundary included in Cfs London Road Notley amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan N/A GRN4 N/A N/A Land to the rear Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No SHLAA 2010 0.6 0 N Y N Group TPO and 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Group Not submitted in of Mayland and Black Town structural TPO/Structural Cfs REMOVED Drive Notley landscaping Landscaping GROUP TPO AREA AND STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPING

N/A GRN5 N/A N/A King William IV Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No SHLAA 2010 0.6 0 Y N Y Public House in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Active pub not Not submitted in Public House and Black Town active use, not resubmitted Cfs REMOVED 114 London Notley resubmitted NOW ACTIVE Road PUB

N/A GRN6 N/A N/A Land at Bridge Great Notley Great Notley Adjacent Main No SHLAA 2010 5.7 1 N Y Y Below threshold 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Flood Zone Not submitted in Farm, London and Black Town 2/3, remainder Cfs REMOVED Road Notley below 90% in Flood threshold Zone, remainder below threshold

GRSA268 GRS2 N/A Land adj to Oak N/A Great Saling Rayne Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Paul White N/A N/A 1.5 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/H (Moderate to (B13) To old A120 None None Flat Part within Existing None Adj None None The site offers a viable opportunity for future development and None N/A N/A N/A 37 N Y Y Spatial strategy FRA would be Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A View, Blake End amlet high sensitivity Flood Zone 2 archaeological should be considered for inclusion as part of an envelope at amendment and required included in to change) and 3 (Evidence road Blake End for the Council's draft plan. The area has a number development current strategy provided of local services and is in close proximity to Braintree and boundary would could be showing smaller Stansted Airport is 15 mins away. be required considered area of flood under new Local risk) Plan

GRYE271 N/A N/A Land at Plants N/A Great Yeldham Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Fisher, Plants Dean Jay N/A 0.6 Vacant/Commer Previously Countryside (Moderate to (B4) From Ridgewell None None Gently slopes Approx. 50% As existing None None None Removal of unsightly structure and replacement with small- None N/A N/A N/A 1 Y Y Y Portion of site 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED That Grow, North That Grow Pearce cial Nursery Developed Land high sensitivity Road down to NE to Flood Zone 2/3, scale residential development utilising existing access to outside flood threshold below threshold Ridgewell Road Architectural including and Greenfield to change) road remainder Low northwest corner. Provision of bungalows. Site is at end of zone 2/3 below Design derelict glass Probability development along Ridgewell Road. The financial gain from threshold houses (Zone 1) the sale of the site for residential would ensure that the existing [long established family] business could be a vibrant and modernised business for the long-term with much improved employment prospects for local jobs for local people. GRYE272 N/A N/A Land at N/A Great Yeldham Yeldham Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Robert N/A N/A 1.25 Garden land Greenfield Ribbon (Relatively high (A4) From Poole None None Relatively Flat Low Probability None Archaeological None None The industrial units at Woodpecker Court (adjacent to my land None N/A N/A N/A 15 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hierarchy status Newcombes, Oliver residential, sensitivity to Street (A1017) (Zone 1) significance not being put forward here) have a permanent “To Let” sign and amendment and included in countryside; Poole Street commercial change) known the site is under-used. It’s also generated complaints in the development current strategy located within units to north, SMR6817 adj past for both noise and smoke nuisance. If the owners of boundary would could be group of A-road Woodpecker Court also put their site forward, the two sites be required considered dwellings which (ours and theirs) combined would provide a sizeable site for under new Local does not have a housing and would have the benefit of using the existing Plan development access off the A1017 to Woodpecker Court, made safer by boundary using my land to improve visibility of their access.

GRYE273 N/A N/A Leeway and N/A Great Yeldham Yeldham Countryside No Call for Sites Mrs Sarah Mr Mark N/A 0.8 Residential and Previously Countryside (Relatively high (A4/B9) From A1017 None None Relatively Flat Low Probability None Archaeological None None The site adjoins land to the east owned by the council which None N/A N/A N/A 15 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Windermere Swanson Jackson, garden land Developed Land and A-road sensitivity to (Zone 1) significance not could provide further residential and an opportunity to joint amendment included in Cottages, Poole Mark Jackson and Greenfield change / known venture the project would be current strategy Street Planning moderate to SMR6817 The site is situated between the larger rural settlements of required could be high sensitivity Great Yeldham and Castle Hedingham on the A1017. It is considered to change) close to the Colne Valley Railway. under new Local Fifty per cent of the site is previously developed land. The Plan remaining land is garden and is not farmed. The site has the capacity to comfortably accommodate 10 to 15 dwellings. The proposer considers that these could be market housing with a proportion of affordable housing in accordance with the council’s affordable housing policy or just an affordable housing scheme. It is a well screened site. It has an existing vehicular access capable of serving the proposed development. There are no legal or development control constraints to the sites development. The site is not currently in agricultural use.

GRYE274 GRY3H 29 Land at Nuns N/A Great Yeldham Yeldham Adjacent Other Yes/No Site Allocations Knight Mr Andy N/A 2 Agricultural Greenfield Residential, (Moderate to (B9/A4) From Church FP10/PROW None Site undulates Low Probability Adj Archaeological None None (Refer to call for sites accompanying documents) Identified as 15/01040/FUL No Pending 29 Y Y Y Site included in 0 0 10 19 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 No N/A Walk Field Village and Developments Butcher, police station high sensitivity Road 87_10 along (Zone 1) conservation significance not housing site in consideration ADMP Development Associate (closed), to change / part of southern area known Site Allocations Management Partner, Strutt telephone Relatively high boundary SMR6817 Document Plan and Parker exchange, sensitivity to (dismantled disused change) railway line adj railway track site)

Page 11 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

Status Availability has been year supply supply year wnfield etc.) etc.) Achievability updated Site DevelopableSite In Year Site Deliverable Not within 5 within Deliverable Not Site Current Year 2015-2016 Year Current 1 2016-2017 Year 2 2017-2018 Year 3 2018-2019 Year 4 2019-2020 Year 5 2020-2021 Year 2016-2021 1-5 Years Total 2026-2031 Years In 2031-2033 Years In 2033 Post GRYE275 GRY5X N/A Hunnable N/A Great Yeldham Yeldham Other Village Yes/No Site Allocations Granville Mr Edward Granville 2.19 Industrial, Previously Residential, N/A Urban From Market None None Flat Low Probability Soakaway Adj SMR6817 Bte682 None The proposed redevelopment of a contaminated former Outline 14/01254/OUT No Outline 60 Y Y Y Discharge of Site has 0 0 0 0 35 25 0 60 0 0 0 0 No N/A Industrial Estate and Developments Gittins, Developments commercial and Developed Land employment Grove (Zone 1) (dismantled Foundries, iron industrial site will enable land remediation to take place in residential application planning planning Development Edward vacant area, informal railway) and steel works order to achieve the beneficial redevelopment of brownfield approved conditions permission for Management Gittins & recreation / 250m zone land whilst contributing to the stock of rural housing in 4.8.15 housing Plan Associates historic landfill / Braintree District. The development also earmarks an area for Bte999 railway future community uses. GRYE276 N/A N/A Land West of N/A Great Yeldham Yeldham Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Gray and Dale Mr Andy N/A 3.6 Agricultural Greenfield Edge of (high sensitivity (A4/B9) Extension of FP10/PROW None Relatively Flat Low Probability Adj SMR6817 250m zone from None Great Yeldham would be a sustainable location for additional None N/A No N/A 70 Y Y Y Development Access needs Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Nuns Walk Field Village Butcher, village, Sports to change / Nuns Walk Field 87_10 southern (Zone 1) (dismantled historic landfill development. Whilst the Core Strategy does not currently boundary to be shown to included in Strutt and ground moderate to development boundary railway) define the village as a key settlement for growth, it enjoys a amendment be achievable current strategy Parker high sensitivity (would need to range of existing services, connectivity and facilities that would be could be to change) cross suggest that it should enjoy a higher status as a location that required considered dismantled would be suitable for development. If the spatial strategy is to under new Local railway line) consider a range of locations in accordance with the advice Plan set out in the NPPF, Great Yeldham should be identified to assist in meeting the requirements. Moreover, the ability to provide for development would meet the objectives of the NPPF to enhance the vitality of this rural community. The land to the south east of Nuns Walk Field identified on the location plan attached to this submission provides an opportunity to deliver a modest scale housing development of approximately 70 homes including affordable units to meet specific local need in a suitable and sustainable location. There is also an opportunity for this site to deliver community and recreational benefits for the village as part of an allocation. The site could come forward as part of the identified allocation at Nuns Walk Field (GRY3) by an extension of the access that will serve that development.

GRYE277 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Great Yeldham Yeldham Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Gray and Dale Mr Andy N/A 5.9 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (A4) Access from FP19/PROW None Relatively Flat Low Probability None None None None Great Yeldham would be a sustainable location for additional None N/A No N/A 100 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Little Hyde Village Butcher, residential, sensitivity to Little Hyde 87_19 NE/ E (Zone 1) development. Whilst the Core Strategy does not currently boundary included in Road Strutt and informal change) Road boundary define the village as a key settlement for growth, it enjoys a amendment current strategy (Blackberry Parker recreation range of existing services, connectivity and facilities that would be could be Field), suggest that it should enjoy a higher status as a location that required considered would be suitable for development. If the spatial strategy is to under new Local consider a range of locations in accordance with the advice Plan set out in the NPPF, Great Yeldham should be identified to assist in meeting the requirements. Moreover, the ability to provide for development would meet the objectives of the NPPF to enhance the vitality of this rural community. The land to the north of Little Hyde Road identified on the location plan attached to this submission provides an opportunity to deliver a modest scale housing development of approximately 100 homes including affordable units to meet specific local need in a suitable and sustainable location. The is also an opportunity for this site to deliver community and recreational benefits for the village as part of an allocation.

GRYE278 GRY2 N/A Land north of N/A Great Yeldham Yeldham Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Gray and Dale Mr Andy N/A 2.2 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A4) Access from FP19/PROW None Relatively Flat Low Probability None None None None Great Yeldham would be a sustainable location for additional None N/A No N/A 40 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Highfields Village Butcher, and residential sensitivity to Highfields 87_19 western (Zone 1) development. Whilst the Core Strategy does not currently boundary included in (Bears Field), Strutt and change) boundary define the village as a key settlement for growth, it enjoys a amendment current strategy Parker range of existing services, connectivity and facilities that would be could be suggest that it should enjoy a higher status as a location that required considered would be suitable for development. If the spatial strategy is to under new Local consider a range of locations in accordance with the advice Plan set out in the NPPF, Great Yeldham should be identified to assist in meeting the requirements. Moreover, the ability to provide for development would meet the objectives of the NPPF to enhance the vitality of this rural community. The land to the north of High Fields identified on the location plan attached to this submission provides an opportunity to deliver a modest scale housing development of approximately 40 homes including affordable units to meet specific local need in a suitable and sustainable location. There is also an opportunity for this site to deliver recreational benefits for the village as part of an allocation.

GGHR279 GRG6 N/A Land Waverney N/A Greenstead Gosfield and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr A Seabrook Mr Damian N/A 1.476 Scrub land Greenfield Residential/co (Relatively high (A4) From adj road Yes None Flat Low Probability Existing None None None None None None N/A N/A N/A 37 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Grange Hill, Green Greenstead Village Lockley untryside sensitivity to (Zone 1) boundary included in Greenstead Green change) amendment current strategy Green would be could be required considered under new Local Plan GGHR281 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Halstead Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Richard N/A N/A 1.5 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 2a From A131 None None Relatively Flat Low probability Agricultural land None None Gas pipeline None Good access onto the public highway (A131), building good None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Halstead and to Greenstead Warren, DC and cricket (Sudbury Road) (Zone 1) drains crosses site quality housing in keeping with existing on the north side of boundary included in A131 Green Warren Farm ground Halstead. The site is available as an when the land is amendment current strategy required for development. would be could be required considered under new Local Plan GGHR282 GRG3 N/A Land adj the N/A Halstead Gosfield and Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Richard N/A N/A 4.82 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Low 4d From A1124 None None Slight Southern None None None None Safeguarded road Continuation of Bluebridge Industrial Estate Site proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed Larger extent east side of Greenstead Town Warren, DC and industrial (Colchester portion Zone route crosses site for employment for housing submitted in Cfs Bluebridge Ind Green Warren Farm Road) 2/3 use REMOVED not Est proposed for housing GGHR283 GRG1 N/A Land adjoining Land adjoining Halstead Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites The Trustees of Mr Nigel Nott, N/A 11.1 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium 3b Access off PROW 88_8, Various Not significant Low Probability Bte589 Additional recreation to compliment existing cricket ground. None N/A No N/A 75 Y Y Y Development Gas pipeline Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A the cricket the cricket Greenstead the Vaizey Whirledge & Land and cricket Sudbury Road PROW 88_10, individual and (Zone 1) Unknown boundary would seriously included in ground, Sudbury ground, Sudbury Green Northern Estate Nott ground PROW 88_44, group TPOs on infill/Gar pipeline amendment constrain current strategy Road, Halstead Road Trust PROW 89_21 site would be development of could be required the site. considered under new Local Plan

GGHR284 GRG4 N/A Land at Ravens Land at Ravens Halstead Gosfield and Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Messrs Mr Nicholas N/A 10.97 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium 4g Access from PROW 88_26 Gentle slope Low Probability Yes Query County Part of the northern site has previously been identified for None N/A No N/A 274 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Larger extent Avenue, Avenue Greenstead Town Borthwick and Harper, Land residential, Ravens northern from north to (Zone 1) Council school use by the County Council. Residential development boundary included in submitted in Cfs Halstead Green Russell as Managing informal Avenue, Well boundary, south ownership of on the site provides a strategic level allocation for housing in amendment current strategy Trustees Director, recreation Field and PROW 88_24 northern portion? Halstead. Development of the site could potentially deliver would be could be Hawkspur Ltd Stansted Road dissects site associated community benefits. There is very good required considered connectivity with existing nearby local facilities and under new Local employment sites nearby. Plan GGHR285 N/A N/A Field Rear Star N/A Halstead Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr John Russell N/A N/A 1.493 Previously Greenfield Countryside, Medium 3b From Colne None None Level Low probability None None None None No known impediments. I am happy to meet the needs of the None N/A No N/A 35 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Style Cottages, Greenstead Vaizey grazing, not in residential, Engaine Lane (Zone 1) community. amendment included in Colne Engaine Green use cricket ground would be current strategy Lane required could be considered under new Local Plan

GGHR307 GRG2 part/ N/A Land off Oak Land to the Halstead Gosfield and Adjacent Main No Call for Sites The Trustees of Gladman N/A 11.76 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - High 5d Access off FP 19 adj Various Difference of Low Probability Yes Archaeological The site is located on the edge of one of the three main towns Outline 14/01580/OUT No N/A 292 Y Y Y Development Site not 5 0 40 62 62 62 61 287 5 0 0 0 No N/A GRG5 Road, Halstead south of Oak Greenstead Town the Marlets Developments Land and residential Mount Hill/Oak southeast individual and 4.5m (Zone 1) significance not of Braintree District Council. The site is located within close permission approved at boundary included in Road/Land at Green Estate Ltd Road and A131 corner group TPOs on known SMR proximity of key services and facilities. There is no known subject to S106 committee amendment current strategy Corner of Oak and adjacent 8602/8603 constraints on site which would limit development. subject to S106 would be could be Road and Mount site 15.9.15 required considered Hill under new Local Plan GGHR430 GRG8X N/A Land at Tidings N/A Halstead Gosfield and Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Not Known Mr Nicholas N/A 10.49 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium 4g From Grange FP22/PROW Various TPOs Level Low probability Yes None Archaeological None None • Residential development on the site provides a strategic None N/A No N/A 262 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Smaller extent Hill (East of Greenstead Town Harper, and residential Close/Tidings 88_22 southern on boundary (Zone 1) significance not level allocation for housing in Halstead for about 265 boundary included in submitted in Cfs Firwoods Road) Green Managing Hill and boundary, around known dwellings on a gross site area of about 10.49 ha shown amendment current strategy Director, Firwoods Close FP23/PROW Firwood's Road SMR8613 edged red on the accompanying site plan. would be could be Hawkspur Ltd 88_23 crosses estate • Development of the site could potentially deliver associated required considered site community benefits such as for example open space, under new Local children’s play equipment or sports facilities as part of a Plan package of S.106 items and CIL contributions. • There is very good connectivity with existing nearby local facilities with pedestrian/cycle access possible at several points from the landowner’s land including Grange Close/Tidings Hill and the footpaths leading into the town. Halstead’s main facilities including retailers, restaurants, schools and library are all within a short walk, cycle ride and car journey. Employment sites are located nearby at Bluebridge, Kings Road and Factory Lane West, providing jobs for new residents within a short walking distance of the site, which supports sustainable development principles. There are bus stops nearby on Conies Road and White Horse Avenue shown on the site plan with buses to Colchester and surrounding towns • The development layout and siting will be planned sensitively, along with structural landscaping and tree/shrub planting undertaken as part of any development, in order to mitigate any visual impact from the surrounding views

HASA286 Greenways, Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Call for Sites Mr and Mrs R & Mr Andrew No 0.9 Domestic/small Greenfield Residenital N/A N/A Off Balls Chase Adjacent on None Slight Low probability Soakaways None None No No Clearly this site is a prime location, ideal and suitable for None N/A No N/A 25 Y Y Y Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Balls Chase, Andrews J Wright Porter holding western (Zone 1) development and other uses are inappropriate development Halstead boundary boundary and has no other allocations HASA287 HAS26 17 Land east of the N/A Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Urban Capacity Multiple N/A N/A 1.78 Vacant land Greenfield Residential/Hig N/A Urban Via The Centre None TPO/Group Sloped Low Probability Existing Conservation Part Unknown None Site allocation N/A N N/A 50 Y Y Y Surface water Site allocated 0 0 0 15 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A High Street Andrews Study Ownership h Street and St Andrews TPOs on site (Zone 1) Area covers 9429/9436/943 for a drainage as a Road part of the site, 8 comprehensive comprehensive rest of site development development adjacent to area area conservation area, listed buildings adjacent, WW2 air raid shelters at southern boundary. HASA288 HAS6 N/A Land adj the N/A Halstead Halstead St Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Richard N/A N/A 16.13 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium 4a/4b Proposed for continuation of Bluebridge Industrial Estate None N/A No N/A 0 Site proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed REMOVED not north of Andrews Town Warren, DC and industrial for employment for housing proposed for Bluebridge Warren Farm use housing industrial estate

HASA289 HAS25 N/A Land at Cherry Land off Cherry Halstead Halstead St Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Alex Tanner, Mr Clive Mr Alex Tanner, 0.824 Scrubland Greenfield Countryside Low 3e Access from Land rises Low Probability Existing The site is an appropriate scale for Halstead. A good strong None N/A No N/A 20 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Tree Close, Tree Close Andrews Town George Tanner Tanner, George Tanner and residential Cherry Tree approx. 10m (Zone 1) watercourse/bro eastern boundary results in the site not being visible in the boundary included in Halstead (Shalford) Ltd Senior (Shalford) Ltd Close from western ok wider landscape surrounding the town, thus containing the amendment current strategy Partner, boundary up to new housing to its immediate context without breaking into the would be could be Hollins the east more sensitive open countryside to the east. required considered Architects, under new Local Surveyors Plan and Planning Consultants HASA290 HAS3 N/A Land between Land between Halstead Halstead St Adjacent Main No Call for Sites The Trustees of Mr Nigel Nott, N/A 7 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 2c Direct access No public Not significant Low Probability Previous (2010) comments: Proposed inclusion of the land None N/A No N/A 175 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Mill Chase and Mill Chase and Andrews Town the Vaizey Whirledge & Land and residential onto Sudbury footpaths (Zone 1) within the development boundary for residential development. boundary included in Sudbury Road, Sudbury Road, Northern Estate Nott Road or Mill through site amendment current strategy Halstead Halstead Trust Chase would be would be could be difficult due to required considered the existing under new Local buildings Plan HASA291 HAS4 N/A Land adjoining Land adjoining Halstead Halstead St Adjacent Main No Call for Sites The Trustees of Mr Nigel Nott, N/A 16.7 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 3d Access off PROW 89_21 Not significant Low Probability Previous (2010) comments: Proposed use of land for None N/A No N/A 418 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Cherry Tree Cherry Tree Andrews Town the Vaizey Whirledge & Land and residential Beeches Ave, northern (Zone 1) residential with informal recreation and landscaping to the boundary included in Close and Close and Northern Estate Nott Chery Tree boundary, higher levels. amendment current strategy Beech Avenue, Beech Avenue Trust Close, and PROW 89_20 would be could be Halstead Brook Street dissects site required considered under new Local Plan HASA292 N/A N/A Land south of N/A Halstead Halstead St Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Not Known John Finch Granville 2.13 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Low 1c From Box Mill None None No Low probability Soakaway/ditch None None None None None None N/A No N/A 42 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Box Mill Lane, Andrews Town Partnership Developments and residential Lane (Zone 1) es boundary included in Halstead amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan

Page 12 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

HASA294 HAS30 N/A Wash Farm N/A Halstead Halstead St Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Christopher Ms Hilary N/A 0.1 Vacant Greenfield Residential N/A Urban From FP16/PROW Group TPO Largely flat Low probability Surface water Adj None None None It is proposed to develop only part of the site towards the rear None N/A No N/A 3 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Hedingham Andrews Town Warder Smith Lock Hedingham 89_16 adj N approx. 40% of (Zone 1) drain on site conservation with a single dwelling, a semi-detached pair, or terrace of boundary included in threshold below threshold Road Halstead Road boundary site area, opp. three smaller units, to reflect the development pattern in amendment current strategy Grade II listed the immediate vicinity. would be could be building required considered under new Local Plan HASA295 HAS7H 287 The Old Wood N/A Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes/No Site Allocations Mr David Mr Neil Mr David 2.31 unused/lumber Previously Residential/De Medium - Low 4a Fenn Road None None Falls slightly Low Probability SUDS None None Possible ground None The scheme would make use of previously developed land but Part site None No N/A 54 Y Y Y Development Whilst part of Part of site is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 No N/A Yard site Fenn Andrews and Vincent, Homer, Vincent, storage Developed Land pot/Countrysid from west to (Zone 1) contamination also use the stream in the centre of the site to create an allocation boundary the site is within the Road Development Director, Planning Director, and Greenfield e east ecological corridor and provide benefits in terms of landscape amendment allocated the development Management Renaissance Director, Renaissance setting ecological enhancements pos provision and amenity would be other half would boundary, and Plan Land RCOH Land and flood risk/rainwater management. The landowner will required need to be is allocated for consider self build. included in the residential use development (HAS7H), boundary. Remainder of HASA513 HAS11H 307 Central Park N/A Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes/No Site Allocations Bellway Homes Mr David Bellway Homes 3 Employment Previously Residential N/A Urban Colchester PROW 89_26 None TBC Low Probability Existing Grade II TBC TBC None BDC has now acknowledge that the emerging evidence on the Draft site None No N/A 104 Y Y Y Local Plan Site included in 0 0 0 0 34 35 35 104 0 0 0 0 No N/A Andrews and Ltd. Fletcher Ltd Developed Land Road runs through (Zone 1) buildings scale of housing needed in the new Local Plan to meet allocation Review ADMP Development site adjacent objectively assessed housing needs for the District will be in employment Management the range of 750 to 950 dwellings per annum. The new plan allocation Plan will require a substantial step change in the approach to the removed in identification of suitable specific developable sites to meet ADMP housing needs for the district. N/A N/A 277 5-7 Market Hill N/A Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Planning Mr G Redman Des Gilbrook N/A 0.037 Licensed Bar Previously Town Centre N/A Urban Pedestrian only None None Relatively Flat Low Probability Conservation SMR_9429/943 None Unknown N/A Planning 12/00852/FUL Yes Yes 6 Y Y Y Site has 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Andrews Permission Developed Land (Zone 1) area and adj 6/9438 Permission planning Cfs listed buildings permission for housing N/A N/A 313 24-34 Bridge N/A Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Planning Bercleys Sarah Frith, N/A 0.06 Offices Previously Town Centre N/A Urban From Bridge None None Flat Flood Zone 2/3 Conservation SMR_9429/943 None Unknown N/A Planning 13/00007/FUL Yes Yes 8 Y Y Y Site has 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Street Andrews Permission Management Oaklever Ltd Developed Land Street area 6/9438 Permission planning Cfs permission for housing N/A N/A 320 Nash Court N/A Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Planning Greenfields Fiona Hunter, NN 0.24 Sheltered bedsit Previously Residential N/A Urban From Gardeners None None Site already Low Probability None None None Unknown N/A Planning 14/00806/FUL No Initial notice 15 Y Y Y Site has 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Gardeners Andrews Permission Community Ingleton accommodation Developed Land Road levelled (Zone 1) Permission received planning Cfs Road Housing Wood permission Norwich N/A N/A 325 Phase 2, 24-34 N/A Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Planning Bercleys Mr N N/A 0.01 Offices Previously Town Centre N/A Urban From Bridge None None Flat Flood Zone 2/3 Conservation SMR_9429/943 None Unknown N/A Permission not 14/00020/COU No N/A 6 Y Y Y Site has 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Bridge Street Andrews Permission Management Chapman, Developed Land Street area 6/9438 required PA COUPA Cfs Nigel Chapman Associates N/A HAS10 272b N/A Nether Priors Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Planning 0.64 14/00041/FUL 3 Y Y Y Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below Not submitted in Andrews Permission & threshold threshold Cfs REMOVED 14/01122/FUL below threshold

N/A HAS22 244 N/A Priory Hall, Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Planning Hallmark Bidwells 0.2 Grounds of a Previously Residential N/A Urban Site access PORW on RPO Not significant Low Probability Existing None None None Unknown None None Planning 10/00509 & Yes Yes 20 Y Y Y Site has 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Colchester Andrews Permission Developments Property care home Developed Land Colchester western and (Zone 1) Permission 10/00084 planning Cfs Road Consultants Road northern permission for boundary housing N/A HAS28 306 N/A Fenn Road Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Site Allocations Essex County N/A 0.691 Light Industry - Previously Countryside N/A Urban Access from N/A None Slopes gently Low Probability Existing N/A N/A Possible due to Unknown None None Pre-submission N/A No N/A 20 Y N Y Current use Site included in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Depot Andrews and Council depot Developed Land and residential Fenn Road eastward (Zone 1) watercourse/bro depot use allocation needs to ADMP Cfs Development ok relocate Management Plan N/A HAS53 N/A N/A The Centre Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Urban Capacity Multiple 0.299 Shops/Offices Previously Town Centre N/A Urban High Street None Multiple TPOs Flat Low Probability Existing Conservation SMR_9429/943 Unknown Unknown None None SHLAA N/A No N/A 8 Y N Y Current use Site is in the 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Town centre Not submitted in Shopping Andrews Study Ownership Developed Land (Zone 1) watercourse/bro area 6/9438 needs to development uses still in Cfs REMOVED Precinct ok relocate boundary, operation town centre identified as frontages still in secondary operation frontage HAS16 Balls Chase Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Planning A.R Clarke Mr P A R Clarke 0.3283 Vacant Land Greenfield Residential N/A N/A Access from None None No Low Probability Existing None None None Unknown None None Planning 15/00328 No N/A 14 Y Y Y Site has 0 0 5 5 4 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 No N/A Andrews Permission (Builders) Ltd Newbould (Builders) Ltd Stanstead Road (Zone 1) Permission 14/00178 planning permission for housing 11 Balls Farm, Halstead Halstead St Main Town Yes Planning David 0.5 Vacant Land Greenfield Residential N/A N/A Ozier Field PROW to front None None Low Probability Existing None None None Unknown None None None N/A No N/A 15 Y Y Y Site requires Site is within 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 15 0 0 0 0 No N/A Tidings Hill Andrews Permission Webber (Zone 1) planning development Partnership permission boundary and has no other allocations HATR296 HAS8 N/A Land north of Land to the Halstead Halstead Trinity Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr J Andrews Mrs Aarti N/A 2.4 Vacant land Greenfield Countryside Medium 1e Access from PROW 89_12 Local Wildlife Site slopes Low Probability Grade II listed The site is available, accessible to a wide range of Local Wildlife N/A No N/A 60 N N N Would need Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Local Wildlife REMOVED Slow Hill, north of Sloe Hill Town O'Leary, and residential Sloe Hill Northern Site Bra150, gently from west (Zone 1) building approx. employment, services and facilities and suitable for residential Site removal of included in Site Local Wildlife Halstead Associate boundary various TPOs to east 83m to north led development. It has the potential to make an important Local Wildlife current strategy. Site Director, on and adjoining east contribution to meeting Halstead's local need for market and Site status - Unlikely to be Lawson northern affordable housing, is deliverable in the short term and merits unlikely to be included in new Planning boundary identification as a housing site. (Some retention of achieved Local Plan due Partnership meadow/public open space.) to Local Wildlife Ltd Site status.

HATR297 HTR2 N/A Conies Field Land to the Halstead Halstead Trinity Adjacent Main No SHLAA 2010 Mr Simon Mr Andrew N/A 1.5 Disused Greenfield Countryside Medium - High 5d Oak Road None None None Low Probability Existing None None None None Coordinates with other proposed development along Oak Site is derelict and has been SHLAA/Call for N/A No N/A 30 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Oak Road north east of Town Saward Crayston, Orchard and residential (Zone 1) watercourse/bro Road, good access to main Braintree Road with nearby bus disused for the past 60 years. Sites boundary included in Halstead Oak Road Fenn Wright ok rout to Colchester and Braintree. Proposed development Adjacent to residential with low amendment current strategy would benefit from a carbon neutral district and heating environmental impact. would be could be scheme (powered by a central biomass boiler installed by required considered Colne biomass ltd. Site allocation would assist BDC demand under new Local for deliverable local housing. Site has well defined boundaries Plan and landscaping. HATR298 N/A N/A Halstead N/A Halstead Halstead Trinity Main Town No Call for Sites Mr Stephen N/A N/A 0.4 Business Units Previously Industrial, N/A Urban From Factory None None Level site Flood Zone 2/3 To adjacent None None None Depending on None None N/A No N/A 12 N N Y ADMP Current use FRA would be Site is currently 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Flood Zone REMOVED Business Overton, Developed Land residential, Lane West river timescale some allocation needs to required allocated for 2/3 Flood Zone 2/3 Centre, Factory Managing River Colne tenants might amendment relocate employment Lane West, Director, JA need to relocate would be use, ELNA Halstead Overton Ltd required suggests larger surrounding area to be redesignated for mixed use HATR299 HAS9 N/A Harrison Works, N/A Halstead Halstead Trinity Main Town No Call for Sites Mr Keith Ripper, Mr Nigel N/A 0.813 Vacant Previously Industrial, N/A Urban From Factory None None Relatively Flat Majority Flood Existing sewers None None Bte994 None Flood risk assessment and contamination reports being None N/A No N/A 30 N Y Y ADMP FRA would be Site is currently 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Flood Zone 2 REMOVED Kings Road Director, Chapman, industrial offices Developed Land residential, Lane West, Zone 2 Foundries, iron prepared. allocation required allocated for Flood Zone 2 Hunwick Planning recreation Kings Road and and steel works amendment employment Engineering Ltd Consultant, ground Parsonage would be use, ELNA Nigel Street required suggests larger Chapman surrounding Associates area to be redesignated for mixed use HATR300 HAS13/14 N/A Halstead N/A Halstead Halstead Trinity Main Town No Call for Sites Mr J Holder, Mr R Bennett, N/A 1.5 Football Ground Previously Countryside, N/A Urban From Rosemary FP13/PROW None Flat Flood Zone 2/3 To soakaways None None Bte634 small Football Club to Option to include adjacent site, owned by Tesco's as part of None N/A No N/A 45 N N Y ADMP FRA would be Current use Site is currently 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Flood Zone 2 REMOVED Football Club Chairman, Bennetts (SA) Developed Land industrial and Lane 89_13 adj W (part of site unknown infill relocate within the residential redevelopment of the Football Club Site. allocation required needs to allocated for and allocated Flood Zone 2 Halstead LLP residential boundary benefitting from Hazardous Halstead to site amendment relocate employment for and allocated Football Club Flood Defence) substance zone with purpose built would be use, ELNA employment for employment H3440 facilities. required suggests use use retention

HATR301 HTR5 N/A Crowbridge Crowbridge Halstead Halstead Trinity Adjacent Main No Call for Sites F.G.Frost & Son Peter Le N/A 4.1 Agricultural Greenfield Residential Medium - Low 6f Chapel Hill adj None None Slight rise to Low Probability No known Adj grade 2 None None None Planning and Listed Building applications shortly to be None N/A No N/A 90 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Farm, Chapel Farm, Chapel Town Grys, Land and to barn west of (Zone 1) issues listed barn. submitted for the conversion of adjoining barn and boundary included in Hill Hill Principle countryside approximately outbuildings into two dwellings. This scheme will make amendment current strategy Town Planner, 10m provision for access road and provide suitable landscaping would be could be Robinson & and setting for the suitable juxtaposition with the proposed required considered Hall LLP neighbouring residential scheme. under new Local Plan HATR302 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Halstead Halstead Trinity Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Not Known John Finch Granville 5.87 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium 1e From Slough None Adj LoWS Sloe Flat Low probability Soakaway/ditch None None None None None None N/A No N/A 117 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Slough Farm Town Partnership Developments and residential Farm Road Cottage (Zone 1) es boundary included in Road, Halstead Meadow amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan HATR303 HAS2 N/A South of Sloe N/A Halstead Halstead Trinity Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr A Fancy Mr Edward N/A 0.1 Garden land Greenfield Countryside N/A Urban From Sloe Hill None None Flat/slight Low probability Soakaway None None None None Request small further amendment to the development None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Hill Town Gittins, and residential incline (Zone 1) boundary to include the garden land of 21 Sloe Hill. boundary included in threshold below threshold Chartered amendment current strategy Town Planner, would be could be Edward required considered Gittins & under new Local Associates Plan

HATR304 HTR1 N/A Land to the Land adjoining Halstead Halstead Trinity Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Martlets Estate Mr Edward N/A 3.95 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium 6g From Mount Hill None None Slight incline Low probability Soakaway None None None None This site, known as Mount Hill Fields, is identified in the None N/A No N/A 99 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A west of Mount Mount Hill Town Trust c/o Agent Gittins, Land and residential (Zone 1) attached plan and extends to approximately 3.95 hectares. boundary included in Hill (Mount Hill Chartered amendment current strategy Fields) Town Planner, The site comprises a tongue of agricultural land which has would be could be Edward established urban development on three sides. As such, its required considered Gittins & release would not constitute encroachment into open under new Local Associates countryside and it would form a natural extension and Plan consolidation of the existing built-up area. It would enable the facilities and employment of the town centre to be within walking distance of future residents and it lies alongside the main bus route between Halstead and Braintree.

The access onto Mount Hill is currently an established agricultural access which enables a safe estate road bellmouth junction to be provided to serve the site.

We suggest that this site at Mount Hill probably represents the most sustainable greenfield site for release at Halstead.

HATR305 HTR7 N/A Land at 83 N/A Halstead Halstead Trinity Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Brian Day Mr Trevor N/A 0.66 Vacant/garden Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 6f From Chapel Hill None Local Wildlife None Low probability None None None None Halstead has a good range of shops and services, and is In terms of access there is an None N/A No N/A 16 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Local Wildlife Smaller extent Chapel Hill Town Dodkins, land and residential Site Bra149 (Zone 1) identified in the adopted Core Strategy as within the top tier in existing farm access along the boundary included in Site submitted in Cfs Phase 2 relation to the settlement hierarchy, its size, location and south-eastern boundary of the amendment current strategy. REMOVED Planning & opportunities for future development. Despite this, Halstead site which is proposed to be would be Unlikely to be Local Wildlife Development saw only a relatively small allocation within the Core Strategy relocated slightly further to the required included in new Site Ltd compared to the other 2 main towns at the same level north which will improve sight Local Plan due Braintree and Witham, despite an emphasis on town centre lines along Chapel Hill. to Local Wildlife regeneration east of the High Street. Site status. The site comprises an area of 0.66ha, and is located to the north west of the town, some 700m from the High Street and very close to the Holy Trinity Primary School. The site itself comprises an existing house which is located within the Halstead development boundary, together with an area of garden land to the rear; an existing former agricultural building; and an area of former agricultural land beyond the agricultural building. It is proposed that part of the site be developed residentially, with an area of land to be retained for community use, exact area to be determined. In justification of the latter we are aware that there is a deficiency of open space provision in this part of Halstead according to the Open Space Study 2008, and the land could make a useful contribution to informal open space in this part of the town. We are aware that children that live in Windmill Road/Spansey Court have no playing area, and this would give them the opportunity of a park/amenity land/ dog walking area without having to cross any road to access it. This area of land could be gifted to Halstead town council for community use.

Page 13 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

HATR308 HTR3 N/A Blamsters/Blam Blamsters Halstead Halstead Trinity Adjacent Main Yes/No Site Allocations Mrs P Mr Mark N/A 2.47 Managed areas/ Greenfield Residential Medium 6g Proposed from None None Flat/gradual Low Probability To be Grade 2 listed None None None The Councils attention is drawn to the previous submissions Given the resolution of Full Pre-submission N/A No N/A 31 Y Y Y Development Site included in 0 0 15 16 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 No N/A HATR309 sters Area 3 southwest of Town and Hennessey Jackson, horse grazing. and separate new slopes (Zone 1) addressed building made to the Council. Council on the 15th September allocation boundary ADMP Acorn Avenue Development Mark Jackson countryside access point. through a future Blamsters Farm 2015 to adopt the land amendment Management Planning Existing access drainage is situated to allocations and development would be Plan from Blamsters strategy. the north and management policies detailed required Farm to be west of the site. within the ADMP for use within closed. This building development management has been the decision-making, ahead of the subject of new Local Plan and the extensive indication to land owners redevelopment developers to progress the both with submission of applications and extensions and to not delay, and the identified new buildings need demonstrated in the within the previous submissions, means historic curtilage that the proposer wishes to in the last 5 come forward with the years. development within the first 5 years of the plan.

N/A HTR6 296 Senior Citizens N/A Halstead Halstead Trinity Main Town Yes Site Allocations Mr Andrew N/A N/A 0.2 Vacant Previously Residential N/A Urban From New None None Site already Low Probability Adj None None None N/A Pre-submission N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Site included in 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Centre New and Epsom, Asset Developed Land and park Street levelled (Zone 1) conservation allocation ADMP Cfs, affordable Street Development Management, area housing site Management Braintree Plan District Council N/A HTR8 N/A N/A Land north of Halstead Halstead Trinity Main Town Yes Planning 0.5 0 Site completed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Building REMOVED Site Ronald Road Permission complete completed HATF310 HAT20X N/A Land adj Walnut N/A Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Martyn Gard, Mrs Hayley N/A 0.28 Hardstanding Previously Residential, N/A Urban From The Street None None Relatively Flat Low probability Opp. Grade II* None None None The site is located in Hatfield Peverel, Braintree, which is None 14/01481/OUT No N/A 5 Y Y Y Development Site can be 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Tree Cottage, and Terling Service Village J & H Webb, and storage Developed Land Public House, (Zone 1) listed pub considered to be a Key Service Village within the Adopted Refused March boundary considered The Street, Properties Planning container A12 Core Strategy September 2011. HAT20X was recommended 2015, appeal in amendment through the new Hatfield Peverel (Chelmsford) Consultant, for inclusion within the development boundary by the Planning progress would be Local Plan Ltd Smart Policy Officer of the Local Planning Authority (LPA) in a report required Planning Ltd to the Local Development Sub-Committee on 17 June 2013. The site was also historically utilised for the purpose of residential development. The site adjoins the adopted development boundary of Hatfield Peverel. The site is adjacent to an existing residential development to the east; Walnut Tree Cottage, the A12 bypass is located directly to the north and The Street, Hatfield Peverel to the south. It is important to note that the site is within the 30mph speed limit of Hatfield Peverel. It is considered that the site currently does not contribute to or enhance the countryside setting of Hatfield Peverel. HATF311 HAT14 N/A The Vineyards, N/A Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Guy Watt, N/A N/A 7.59 Agricultural and Previously Countryside, Medium (HP4) From the FP2/PROW None Flat Low probability None None None The site is leased We think it is important to integrate any development on this None N/A No N/A 150 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A and Terling Service Village Company limited Developed Land residential and Vineyards 90_2 adj E (Zone 1) for agricultural site with the rest of the village. We would therefore like to boundary included in Secretary, residential and Greenfield A12 boundary use. explore the possibilities of including footpaths and cycle amendment current strategy Thomas Dixon tracks in any detailed development plans for the site would be could be Developments required considered under new Local Plan

HATF312 HAT14 N/A Part of the N/A Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Guy Watt, N/A N/A 1.5 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium (HP4) From the FP2/PROW None Flat Low probability None None None The site is leased The site forms part of a larger piece of land owned by Thomas None N/A No N/A 30 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Southern part of Vineyards and Terling Service Village Company residential and Vineyards 90_2 adj E (Zone 1) for agricultural Dixon Developments Ltd and the company is submitting the boundary included in larger site Hatfield Peverel Secretary, A12 boundary use. whole site for consideration for development by the Council. amendment current strategy submitted for Thomas Dixon would be could be Site Alloc Developments required considered under new Local Plan

HATF313 HAT17H 130 Sorrells Field N/A Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Key Service Yes Site Allocations Knight Mr James Knight 1.93 Paddock/reside Greenfield Arla Dairy, Medium 1a Access from None None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None See attached delivery statement. Pre-submission N/A No N/A 46 Y Y Y Development Site included in 0 0 10 40 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 No N/A and Terling Village and Developments Firth, Developments ntial residential, Bury Lane (Zone 1) allocation boundary ADMP Development Associate A12 amendment Management Planner, Strutt would be Plan & Parker required

HATF314 HAT2 & N/A Land South of Land to the Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mrs Catherine Mrs Lisa N/A 10.94 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium 2c Access from FP43/PROW None Flat Low probability Grade II* listed None None None Our client’s site presents a number Gladman contend that the None N/A No N/A 220 Y Y Y Seek advice Seek advice Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A HAT2 western HAT3 The Street, south of Stone and Terling Service Village Gray and Ms Skinner, Land residential, Stone Path 90_43 crosses (Zone 1) Hatfield Place, of opportunities as follows: development boundary of the from from heritage boundary included in portion, HAT3 Hatfield Peverel Path Drive and Lucinda Director WYG trunk road Drive, Church the site The William • The site can accommodate a reasonable amount of housing site should not be amanded. Environmental specialists amendment current strategy eastern portion West of Church Fletcher Road or The Boosey (PH), whilst offering generous public open space and a country park The site could be Health re. would be could be of overall site Road/Land to Street and Grade II and landscaping; sympathetically developed to noise/pollution required considered submitted in the west of listed Hill House • Ideally sited to the south of the A12 with easy access to all provide a logical extension to issues under new Local Cfs, area Hatfield Peverel adj site. community facilities; the settlement, reflecting the Plan proposed for and east of • There is already an extensive network of existing footpaths characteristircs and setting of country park Hatfield Place and public rights of way to link into; its location. The site is and housing • Within easy walking distance of local facilities; considered to be deliverable, as • Good quality housing and design without the need for it is available now, and offers a environmental mitigation due to the presence of the A12, suitable and sustainable railway and employment site; location for residenital • The opportunity for low density development to soften the development in the new Local edge of the Village; Plan. The landowner and • Varies types of housing could be provided including Gladman are keen todeliver a affordable to meet the needs of the Village. high quality scheme on the site and would welcome further discussions with the Council regarding this.

HATF315 HAT4 N/A Land at Land at Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Andrew N/A N/A 16 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium/Medium 1h Access from None None Flat Low probability Land drainage None None Gas pipeline None This site is adjacent to the existing allocated development None N/A No N/A 432 Y Y Y Liaison with Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Woodend Farm, Woodend, and Terling Town Wood Land mainline - Low (majority Hatfield Road (Zone 1) pipes and crosses the boundary and would be a logical extension of the focus of Highways boundary included in London Road, Hatfield Road, railway, adj south of ditches site. Adjacent recent development in the town. Authority re. amendment current strategy Witham Witham Core Strategy railway)/ to the A12 It adjoins the preferred growth location of the main town. trunk road would be could be Growth 1e junction and the It would benefit from infrastructure already created and access required considered Location, filling railway line planned for the previous Maltings Lane phases, for example: under new Local station dissects the schools, sports, health and community facilities along with Plan north part of the cycle routes, walkways, public transport and employment site. opportunities. The 1993 Local Plan inspector concluded: 'Lodge Farm and the adjacent Wood End Farm do not make a significant contribution to the function of the Green Wedge. The junction of Hatfield Road with the A12 form the boundary of the important gap between the two settlements which needs to be preserved to prevent their coalescence.' He commented: 'The firm hedge line to the west of the Nursery, that is southwestern boundary of Wood End Farm, would provide an identifiable and defensible long term boundary to the Green Wedge in this area.'

HATF316 HAT22X Land at Land at Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Adjacent Main No Site Allocations Mr Andrew N/A N/A 2 Agriculture, Previously Countryside Medium - Low 1h From Hatfield No None Flat Low probability Drainage pipes None None Adjacent trunk None N/A No No 50 Y Y Y Liaison with Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Woodend Farm, Woodend, and Terling Town and Wood retail, Developed Land Road (Zone 1) road Highways boundary included in London Road, Hatfield Road, Development commercial, and Greenfield Authority re. amendment current strategy Witham Witham Management storage, trunk road would be could be Plan catering & access required considered dwelling under new Local Plan

HATF317 HAT1 & N/A Land off Land east of Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Adjacent Key No Call for Sites A Wood, J C/o Mr Sean 5.2 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium (HP4) Access from FP40/PROW TPOs adj Generally flat, Low probability None None Gas pipeline None The site is partially enclosed by an existing semi-mature None N/A No N/A 135 Y Y Y Seek advice Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A HAT1 smaller HAT5 Gleneagles Gleneagles and Terling Service Village Rees, G Developer Marten, Senior Land residential, Birkdale 90_40 adj south southern dipping Slightly (Zone 1) adjacent south vegetation to the north and north eastern boundaries which from boundary included in area, HAT5 total Way, Hatfield Way, Hatfield Mitchell Smith, J Planner, David trunk road Road/Gleneagle eastern boundary towards the eastern screens the majority of views over the A12 and adjacent Environmental amendment current strategy area Peverel/Land at Peverel Osborn, G Wilson Homes s Way boundary north eastern boundary, major countryside. To the southeast and west the site adjoins rear Health re. would be could be Graceland, The Hodges Eastern boundary gas outer zone gardens which make up part of the eastern edge of Hatfield noise/pollution required considered Street Counties An overhead Peverel. issues under new Local powerline runs The site is located on the north eastern edge of a large Plan through the site village. from the There is a network of Public Rights of Way leading from southernmost Hatfield Peverel to the surrounding countryside. A pedestrian corner abutting footpath/cycleway also runs along the A12 linking Hatfield Gleneagles Peverel to Witham. Way, north easterly towards the eastern boundary To the southern boundary of the proposed site minerals extraction has been granted permission. Close proximity to A12.

HATF318 Land to south Nounsley Hatfield Peverel Adjacent other No Site Allocations Strutt & Parker Mrs Hayley N/A 0.14 Laid to grass Greenfield residenital/par N/A N/A Sportsmans Northwest None Slopes north to Low probability TBC Adjacent to Adj SMR_8573 None None None N/A No N/A 3 Y Y Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED east of and Terling village and Farms Ltd Morley, k and Lane border south (Zone 1) registered parks Threshold below threshold Sportsman's Development Associate garden/Countr and garden and Arms PH, Management Planner, Strutt yside schedule Sportsmans Plan and Parker monument, and Lane, Nounsley assocaited listed buildings

HATF319 N/A N/A Land to the N/A Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Countryside No Call for Sites Mr D Bolton Mr Edward N/A 0.56 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium - Low 2b From B1137 None None Flat Low probability None None None None The site lies close to Crix Corner, a small hamlet to the west None N/A No N/A 5 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Does not REMOVED south of London and Terling Gittins, residential and London Road (Zone 1) of Hatfield Peverel. The development is envisaged for five amendment included in adjoin a does not adjoin Road (East of Chartered A12 detached dwellings served off a private drive by improving the would be current strategy. development a development Ambleside) Town Planner, established farm field access onto London Road. The site required Not considered boundary boundary and Edward enjoys ease of access to public transport with adjacent bus to be would not be a Gittins & stops providing sustainable transport links to the nearby sustainable natural Associates community services of Hatfield Peverel and Chelmsford. With location, and it extension to the associated landscaping which will reinforce the existing trees would not existing and hedges, the visual of the proposed development on the constitute a development countryside would be minimal. natural boundary for extension to the Hatfield Peverel development boundary for Hatfield Peverel.

Page 14 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

Status Availability has been year supply supply year wnfield etc.) etc.) Achievability updated Site DevelopableSite In Year Site Deliverable Not within 5 within Deliverable Not Site Current Year 2015-2016 Year Current 1 2016-2017 Year 2 2017-2018 Year 3 2018-2019 Year 4 2019-2020 Year 5 2020-2021 Year 2016-2021 1-5 Years Total 2026-2031 Years In 2031-2033 Years In 2033 Post HATF321 HAT12 N/A Land Between Land between Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Countryside No Call for Sites Ulting Overseas Mr Andy N/A 68 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium (HP4) Access via FP40/PROW There are four Generally flat Low probability None None The site has None The timescales for delivery will be dependent on detailed None N/A No N/A 500 Y Y Y Seek advice Liaison with Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel and Terling Trust Butcher, Land residential, Maldon 90_40 crosses reservoirs (Zone 1) previously had discussion with key stakeholders to do with accessibility, the from Highways amendment and included in & Witham South and Witham Partner, Strutt trunk road Road/Wickham northern area of situated within permission A12 the potential for incorporation of adjoining land parcels Environmental Authority re. development current strategy of A12 and Parker Bishops Road site the proposed granted for a (land to the south west) to provide for a comprehensive Health re. trunk road boundary would could be LLP site. minerals master-planned development. Commencement 2024, noise/pollution access be required considered extraction site. completion 2039. issues under new Local Gas pipeline Hatfield Peverel is clearly a sustainable location for additional Plan runs through development, especially as it is identified as a key service site village within the Core Strategy. The village enjoys a wide range of existing services and facilities that suggest its suitability for development. In terms of connectivity, Hatfield Peverel is served by a railway station on the east coast mainline to Liverpool Street. Development will help maintain the vitality and viability of local services and facilities. The site has direct vehicular access from the B1019 (Maldon Road) and is clearly related to the existing eastern boundary of Hatfield Peverel. The site contains a number of water features which could be landscaped to increase the biodiversity of the area. The site is located immediately to the south east of the A12 and as part of the landscape proposals a tree screen and bund could be placed alongside this road albeit with additional land being allowed for the future upgrading of this road. The site is well related to an existing primary school and recreational ground. The provision of landscaping would also ensure that a permanent landscape buffer is created between Hatfield Peverel and Witham.

N/A HAT15SHLA N/A N/A Universal Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Key Service Yes SHLAA 2010 Chelmsford Car Smart N/A 0.19 Motor garage Previously Residential N/A Urban Access off The None None Flat Low probability Adj Grade II None Possible None N/A None N/A No N/A 6 Y N Y Current use Within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in A Garage, The and Terling Village and Planning Ltd and forecourt Developed Land Street (Zone 1) listed Salvator contamination needs to development Cfs Street Commercials area (Garage relocate boundary, on main road) previous permission (2007) for 13 dwellings not implemented. HATF320 HAT15 N/A Land adj N/A Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Daniel Mr Abraham N/A 0.13 Redundant Greenfield Countryside (Low to (B21) From Nounsley None None Flat Low probability None None None None Proposes an amendment to the Nounsley Inset Map None N/A No N/A 3 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Badgers Oak, (Nounsley) and Terling Village Skeates Laker, Senior waste land and residential moderate Road (Zone 1) settlement boundary to identify a sustainable site for provision boundary included in threshold below threshold Nounsley Road Town Planner, sensitivity to of up to 3 additional market dwellings. amendment current strategy Capita change) would be could be Property and required considered Infrastructure under new Local Ltd Plan

HATF322 N/A N/A Land at N/A Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Mark Hodge N/A N/A 3 Domestic Previously Countryside (Low to (B21) From Nounsley None None Relatively Flat Flood Zone 2/3 None None None None At present scale of development is undecided. There are None N/A No N/A 4 N N Y Development Current use FRA would be Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Nounsley Road (Nounsley) and Terling Dwelling, Developed Land and residential moderate Road western half of some immediate considerations to be made to the success of boundary needs to required included in threshold below threshold Business and Greenfield sensitivity to site my current business. My main concern at present is that the amendment relocate current strategy (Fishery) change) land currently owned by considered as possible site would be could be development land in the future. required considered under new Local Plan

HATF514 Casa Feliz, Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Countryside No Call for Sites Mr and Mrs N/A N/A 0.4 Garden Land Greenfield countryside N/A N/A From Manor None None Flat Low probability None None None None None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Manor Road, (Nounsley) and Terling Peter and and residential Road (Zone 1) boundary included in Nounsley, Susan Coulson amendment current strategy Chelmsford, would be could be essex, CM3 required considered 2LZ under new Local Plan

HATF515 Hawthorns, Hatfield Peverel Hatfield Peverel Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Raymond N/A N/A 0.32 Garden land Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A Peverel Avenue None None Flat Low probability Existing None None None Access by None N/A No N/A 8 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Peverel (Nounsley) and Terling Curtis and residential (Zone 1) agreement boundary included in Avenue, amendment current strategy Nounsley, would be could be Hatfield Peverel required considered under new Local Plan

HELI323 N/A N/A Land rear of N/A Helions Bumpstead Adjacent Other Yes/No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs John Mr Michael N/A 0.24 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B3) From Haverhill FP26/PROW None Relatively Flat Low probability Adj Grade II None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 6 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Backland REMOVED Krikseys, Bumpstead Village Ramsey Sale, Michael and residential high sensitivity Road 91_26 N/W (Zone 1) listed Krikseys boundary included in development backland Haverhill Road Sale to change) boundaries, amendment current strategy in area with development in Architectural FP32 91_32 NE would be could be linear form area with linear Surveyors Ltd boundary and required considered form along access under new Local Plan

HELI329 HEL7 N/A Between Breton N/A Helions Bumpstead Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs John Mr Michael N/A 2.023 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B3) From Haverhill FP14/PROW None Slopes down Low probability Adj None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 50 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Cottage & Mill Bumpstead Village Ramsey Sale, Michael and residential high sensitivity Road 91_14 W eastwards (Zone 1) conservation boundary included in Cottage, Mill Sale to change) boundary, towards road area amendment current strategy Road Architectural FP53/PROW would be could be Surveyors Ltd 91_53 N required considered boundary under new Local Plan

HELI324 HEL2 N/A Land between N/A Helions Bumpstead Other Village Yes/No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs John Mr Michael N/A 0.77 Redundant Greenfield Countryside, (Moderate to (B3) From Haverhill None None Rises gently to Low probability Adj Grade II None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 19 Y Y Y Allocated for Within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Slate Hall & Bumpstead (Pale Ramsey Sale, Michael Farm Buildings residential, high sensitivity Road north (Zone 1) listed Rest a employment in development Chestnut Lodge, Green) Sale caravan club to change) While/Slate Hall ADMP, ELNA boundary Haverhill Road Architectural site suggests identified in Surveyors Ltd removal of ADMP designation HELI325 HEL5 N/A Land between N/A Helions Bumpstead Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs John Mr Michael N/A 0.63 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B3) From Haverhill FP55/PROW None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 15 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hilltop Villa & Bumpstead (Pale Village Ramsey Sale, Michael and residential high sensitivity Road 91_55 crosses (Zone 1) included in Allemagne Pale Green) Sale to change) site, current strategy Green Architectural FP44/PROW could be Surveyors Ltd 91_44 western considered boundary under new Local Plan

HELI326 N/A N/A North of N/A Helions Bumpstead Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs John Mr Michael N/A 0.33 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, (Moderate to (B3) Via adjoining None None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 8 Y Y Y Allocated for Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Backland Chestnut Lodge, Bumpstead (Pale Village Ramsey Sale, Michael residential and high sensitivity sites (Zone 1) allotments in included in development Pale Green Green) Sale farmyard to change) (HELI324/327) ADMP current strategy in area with Architectural could be linear form Surveyors Ltd considered under new Local Plan

HELI327 HEL3 N/A Adj & South N/A Helions Bumpstead Other Village Yes/No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs John Mr Michael N/A 0.225 Agricultural Greenfield Residential (Moderate to (B3) From Haverhill None None Flat Low probability None None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 5 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A West of Bumpstead (Pale Ramsey Sale, Michael and farmyard high sensitivity Road (Zone 1) included in Chestnut Lodge, Green) Sale to change) current strategy Pale Green Architectural could be Surveyors Ltd considered under new Local Plan

HELI328 HEL4 N/A Land between N/A Helions Bumpstead Other Village Yes/No Site Allocations Mr & Mrs John Mr Michael N/A 0.29 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B3) From Haverhill FP70/PROW None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 7 Y Y Y Within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Haven Cottage Bumpstead (Pale and Ramsey Sale, Michael and residential high sensitivity Road 91_70 NE (Zone 1) development and Water Green) Development Sale to change) Boundary boundary Tower, Pale Management Architectural identified in Green Plan Surveyors Ltd ADMP HELI330 N/A N/A Land adj N/A Helions Bumpstead Countryside No Call for Sites Mrs Jill Vinton Mr N/A 0.11 Leased to 3rd Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B3) From Haverhill None None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None The land is sited between two existing dwellings fronting None N/A No N/A 2 Y Y Y Development Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Timbers, Pale Bumpstead (Pale Christopher party for and residential high sensitivity Road (Zone 1) Haverhill Road and should therefore be considered an infill boundary threshold. threshold below threshold Green Green) Reynolds gardening and to change) plot. amendment chickens would be required BOCN128 BON6HAlt N/A Land south of N/A High Garrett Bocking North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Barry N/A N/A 0.99 Trees Greenfield Countryside/re N/A Urban Broad Road None TPO Woodland Flat Low Probability Existing None None None None It is proposed to construct one dwelling centrally location on None N/A N/A N/A 1 N Y Y Seek advice Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Grove Field Town Edwards sidential (Zone 1) the site so being screened by existing woodland. Therefore from Landscape threshold. threshold Woodland TPO there would be no visual impact on the surrounding area. The Svs covers site and house would be accessed by an existing vehicle access and below threshold driveway. BOCN130 GOG4X N/A Land between N/A High Garrett Bocking North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Mark Brand N/A N/A 0.42 Redundant land Greenfield Residential N/A Urban Existing None TPO to front Flat Low Probability Existing None None None None Small sites should be allowed which will help improve housing None N/A N/A N/A 14 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A 90-92 High Town and (Zone 1) supply. Site is currently vacant to allow for a possible link boundary included in Garrett Road countryside road to the north around Braintree which has not happened. amendment current strategy Site will benefit local people by employment, alternative would be could be housing and locally invested profits. required considered under new Local Plan KELV331 KEL2 N/A St Dominics Land to the rear Kelvedon Kelvedon and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Ray Mr Peter N/A 1.5 Vacant land Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 2b Via existing None None Flat Majority of site Via the existing Adjacent Archaeological None None The site is separated from the adjoining countryside by a None N/A No N/A 41 Y Y Y Seek advice Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Residential of London Feering Service Village Banning, Brady, and residential care home Low probability Care Home conservation significance not substantial hedge. The site is not visible from the open from heritage boundary included in Care Home, Road, Church Owner, St Solicitor, The access (Zone 1), Flood System area known SMR countryside and appears to be part of the village. specialists amendment current strategy London Road, Street Dominics Care Planning Law Zone 2/3 8141- Immediately to the west of the site is the housing would be could be Kelvedon Home Practice western corner 8144/8249- development known as The Cloisters. required considered 8252 These representations seek the allocation of land at the rear under new Local of St Dominics Residential Care Home for the provision of Plan extra care housing to be occupied by the elderly and operated in conjunction with the Care Home. Extra care housing caters for older people who, through frailty or disability are less able to live in their own homes without significant support. Part of the Government's strategy is to enable older people to live independently in their own homes for as long as possible, a facility which extra care housing offers. The provision of the extra care units will have a significant benefit for the area by reducing the demands that are made generally on the heath and care services in the District. The fact that immediate care would be available to the residents of the extra care units from the resources of the existing Care Home would significantly reduce the pressure of the social services authorities to provide such care.

KELV332 St Dominics Land to the rear Kelvedon Kelvedon and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Ray Mr Peter N/A 0.8 Garden land Greenfield Residential/car Medium - Low 2b Via existing None None Flat Low probability Existing Adj Archaeological None None As above None N/A No N/A 20 Y Y Y Development Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Residential of London Feering Service Village Banning, Brady, ehome/country care home (Zone 1) conservation significant not boundary from heritage included in Care Home, Road, Church Owner, St Solicitor, The side access area known amendment specialists current strategy London Road, Street Dominics Care Planning Law SMR_8141 - would be could be Kelvedon Home Practice 8144/8249 - required considered 8252 under new Local Plan

KELV333 N/A N/A Land at Park N/A Kelvedon Kelvedon and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Henry Miss Kate N/A 59.85 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 1g/1i From Hollow FP11/PROW None Not significant Low probability Grade II Listed None Major gas Additional land is owned adjacent which can be included in None N/A No N/A 1496 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hierarchy status Farm Hollow Feering Siggers Jennings, Land Road 92_11 and (Zone 1) Park Farm, adj pipeline crosses development proposals if considered necessary to further boundary included in countryside; Road, Kelvedon Whirledge & FP21/PROW Grade II Listed site enhance viability. amendment current strategy separated from Nott 92_21 Lingwoods and would be could be Kelvedon and Lingwood required considered development Cottage under new Local boundary by Plan mainline railway line

KELV334 Allshots Kelvedon Kelvedon and Countryside REMOVED Not Enterprises/ Feering proposed for The former residential uses Polish Camp, Woodhouse Lane, Kelvedon, Colchester

KELV335 KEL3 N/A Monks Farm, Land at Kelvedon Kelvedon and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Adrian Lott, Mr Andrew N/A 9 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium 1h Existing farm FP21/PROW None Gently slopes to Low probability Currently to None None None Separated from Whilst the site is proposed at this stage in its entirety, it is None N/A No N/A 243 Y Y Y Seek advice Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A north of railway Coggeshall Feering Service Village Managing Hiorns, Land residential, access, access 92_21 western east and north (Zone 1) Blackwater main area of envisage that either all or part of the site can be suitable for from boundary included in and south east Road, south of Director, Director, mainline may be possible boundary, Valley, in future village by railway development. Access to the site would most probably be from Environmental amendment current strategy of Coggeshall Observer Way Parkers of Andrew railway onto Coggeshall FP12/PROW via SUDS to line the north or east off Coggeshall Road. Strong landscape Health re. would be could be Road, Kelvedon Leicester Ltd Hiorns Town Road 92_12 eastern river boundaries would be planted to help provide definition and noise/pollution required considered Planning Ltd boundary mitigate any longer-range views from the wider landscape. issues under new Local The proposal is envisaged as a new neighbourhood within the Plan village and district, well related and accessible to the main facilities in the village but also providing new facilities, including parkland and open spaces to serve its immediate community. In our view the site forms a suitable location for new development that is well related to the existing centre of the village and close to the station, and can be an attractive and logical extension to the village.

Page 15 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

KELV338 N/A N/A Land south of N/A Kelvedon Kelvedon and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites 35 0 Not proposed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed REMOVED land London Road Feering Service Village for housing for housing proposed for r/o 61-95 country park in Kelvedon association with KELV337 N/A KEL8 N/A N/A Industrial Estate Kelvedon Kelvedon and Key Service No SHLAA 2010 G Crowe & Son Alan Stones N/A 1 Poor quality Previously Light industry, N/A Urban Access from None None Flat Low probability Conservation Archaeological Bte722 Employment N/A None N/A No N/A 20 Y N Y Local Plan Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Station Road Feering Village (Holdings Ltd) coach depot Developed Land residential High (Zone 1) area, site significance not gasworks, allocation in employment use from heritage included in Cfs and land to rear with parking off Street/Station includes Grade known northern part of LPR2005/ADMP allocation specialists current strategy busy main road. Road II listed building SMR8286- site amendment could be Goldkey and is adj 4 8290/8256/826 would be considered Industrial Estate listed buildings 2 required under new Local - active but poor on the High Plan condition. Street Includes car repairs and coach depots. Church?

N/A KEL6SHLAA 125 Railway Garage Works and Kelvedon Kelvedon and Key Service Yes SHLAA 2010 Deal of Ian N/A 1.269 Commercial Previously Village centre N/A Urban From Station None None Flat Front portion of Conservation Archaeological PrBte21 N/A None 07/00185/OUT No N/A 28 Y Y Y Current use FRA would be Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Site Station garage adj, Feering Village Kelvedon Wickerson, garage (car Developed Land Road site Flood Zone area/ adj significance not Landfills and approved in needs to required development Cfs Road Kelvedon Kelvedon Bidwells showroom/work 2/3, majority conservation known other waste principle subject relocate boundary and is Station shop), Zone 1 area SMR8286- disposal, to S106, identified as a commuter 8290/8256/826 Bte722 subsequently comprehensive parking 2 gasworks withdrawn in development 2011 area

KELV336 KEL12X N/A Land off N/A Kelvedon Kelvedon and Countryside No Call for Sites Ms S Chung Mr Edward N/A 0.198 Class B2 Previously Countryside Medium 1j From None None Gentle slope Low probability None None None Seven Seas We propose a minor supplementation of available housing None 14/01329/OUT No N/A 5 Y N Y Development Current use Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Coggeshall (Newtown) Feering Gittins, General Developed Land Coggeshall (Zone 1) Marble would land at Kelvedon via the inclusion of part of the long- Refused Jan boundary needs to included in Road (Seven Chartered Industrial Road relocate established Seven Seas commercial/general industrial site 2015 amendment relocate current strategy, Seas Works Town Planner, within the Development Boundary. The company wishes to would be PDL, could be Site) Edward relocate its business as it is precluded from undertaking direct required considered Gittins & sales from the site and it lies within a flood risk area. The under new Local Associates parts of the site closer to the B1024 lie outside the main flood Plan risk area and would visually adjoin established development.

LITM340 LIM2 N/A Cock Road N/A Little Maplestead Gosfield and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Barry Ludlam N/A N/A 0.08 Garden land Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (B6) From Cock None None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None Would be beneficial to help meet the need for local residential None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Greenstead Village residential, A- sensitivity to Road (Zone 1) accommodation without having a detrimental impact on the boundary included in threshold below threshold Green Road change) area. I consider smaller sites such as this to provide a amendment current strategy balanced and varied mix of building for the future. Also sites would be could be such as this have very little or no impact on existing required considered infrastructure. The visual impact would be minimal and under new Local unobtrusive. Plan

LITM341 N/A N/A Adj Littlehame N/A Little Maplestead Gosfield and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Peter Nott Miss Belinda N/A 0.19 Vacant Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (B6) From Collins None None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None The site looks like a building plot and is a brownfield site None N/A No N/A 4 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Greenstead Young, Land residential, A- sensitivity to Road/A131 (Zone1) which houses have been situated on since the first maps we amendment and included in threshold below threshold Green Partners LLP Road change) have had site of. The site measures approximately 30m wide development current strategy and sits well within a row of existing properties and we boundary would could be believe the construction of two replacement dwellings would be required considered be in keeping with the existing settlement. Without the under new Local development the site has little use as it is too small to be used Plan for agricultural use or horse grazing. The site of Home Cottage has to be topped mechanically which is inconvenient to the residential neighbours and the owners. The site is not within the village envelope of Little Maplestead as defined in planning documents but the nature of the village is very disparate, there being 3 separate areas of village envelope. We believe that 10 standing properties surrounding the site on the eastern side of the Sudbury Road, form a further area of village development which could support two further dwellings. For wont of a better description, it has been classed as 'open countryside' in planning terms but it is bounded on both sides by close board fencing and is of a size and nature that lends itself well to development. We believe that the reinstatement of this area of land is appropriate and immediately deliverable.

LITM342 LIM1 N/A Land at Cock N/A Little Maplestead Gosfield and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Peter N/A N/A 0.4 Grass Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (B6) From Cock None None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None Easy to develop. None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Road Greenstead Village Schwier and residential sensitivity to Road (Zone 1) boundary included in Green change) amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan LITY343 N/A N/A Land adj to N/A Little Yeldham Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Paul N/A N/A 0.05 Garden land Greenfield Countryside (Moderate (B5) Shared access None None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 1 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Mousetraps, North Suckling and residential sensitivity to with Mousetraps (Zone 1) amendment included in threshold below threshold Hall Green change) would be current strategy. required Not considered to be sustainable location, unlikely to be included in new Local Plan.

N/A N/A N/A Westrope N/A New England Bumpstead Countryside No Other Westrope Bros Sarah N/A 4.7 Haulage depot, Previously Countryside (Relatively high (A2) From A1017 None None Relatively Flat Majority and None Archaeological Bte685 N/A None N/A No N/A 100 N N Y Spatial strategy Current use Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not a natural REMOVED Haulage Yard Ltd Ballantyne- former nursery Developed Land and A-Road sensitivity to access Low significance not factories making amendment needs to included in extension of a countryside Way, SBW and Greenfield change) probability known or using wood would be relocate current strategy. development location Planning Ltd (Zone 1), some SMR6964 required Not considered boundary Zone 2/3 to be towards sustainable northern end of location, unlikely site to be included in new Local Plan.

STEB391 N/A N/A Land adj Pitt N/A New England Bumpstead Countryside No Call for Sites Mrs Elizabeth N/A N/A 2.3 Grass land Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A2) From A1017 None None Rises gently to Low probability None Archaeological Bte266 & N/A None N/A No N/A 19 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not a natural REMOVED House, New Filbey and A-Road sensitivity to the west (Zone 1) significance not Bte760 amendment included in extension of a countryside England change) known unknown infill would be current strategy. development location SMR6958/6959 required Not considered boundary /6960/6961, to be archaeological sustainable road 1626 location, unlikely to be included in new Local Plan.

GRSA270 GRS1 N/A Boxted Wood, Land East of None Rayne Countryside No Call for Sites Mr John August Ms Ciara Mr John August Up to Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B13) B125 None on site Ancient Not significant Small part of No issues None None None None We believe the best option of accommodating a significant A new settlement would None None None None 1500 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Cross border Stebbing Green Stebbing Whelehan 135 high sensitivity woodland in part site within Flood proportion of the districts housing growth is a completely free present a significant opportunity amendment and included in site, some parts (Boxted Wood) to change) of site boundary Zone 2 and 3. standing new settlement at Boxted Wood. This site would that must be realised, through: development current strategy in Uttlesford Design proposal also allow cross boundary partnership with Uttlesford District, boundary would could be District (4500 to remediate. providing much needed housing, employment and community • Providing community open be required considered total units 1500 uses for both Districts, whilst minimising the spread of space as part of a new under new Local within Braintree development across the district. This would alleviate the settlement, and not placing any Plan District) challenges to existing town and village infrastructure from strain on provision; having to provide increased services to accommodate small • Providing sufficient economies piecemeal developments. A free standing settlement at of scale to deliver new Boxted Wood would be of a scale to be able to fund its own infrastructure and services, development and area improvements required along with including schools, again placing providing market and affordable housing to the community. no additional strain on existing provision; • Providing the flexibility to locate a new town in an area of low landscape / biodiversity sensitivity, and to incorporate any significant features as part of the development; • Avoiding any negative impact on historic character by locating the majority of development away from existing historic towns and villages; and • Delivering mixed use development, creating a community that includes new shops and services, rather than locating homes on the periphery of existing towns, away from the existing town centre and services. A new settlement would present a significant opportunity that must be realised, through:

• Providing community open space as part of a new settlement, and not placing any strain on provision; BLAN110 (Small part N/A Land East of N/A Nr Great Notley Great Notley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr R Edwards, N/A N/A 1 Grass Greenfield Countryside Medium 5a Access from None None Generally Flat Low probability None None None None Site available now. None N/A No N/A 20 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Would be Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A of Friaries and Black Mr T Edwards, and low Bakers Lane (Zone 1) amendment and dependent on included in BLA5/BLA1 Notley Mr A Edwards density development other adjacent current strategy 1) residential boundary would sites being could be be required allocated. considered under new Local Plan BLAN113 BLA4 N/A Lynderswood N/A Nr Great Notley Great Notley Countryside No Call for Sites William Fisher Mr Richard N/A 8.26 Employment/car Previously Countryside/de N/A (B16) Existing None None No Low Probability Surface Water None Adj SMR_6119 Unknown No It is submitted by BBBF that LFBP is an exemplar existing Permission of N/A N/A N/A 0 Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Not proposed REMOVED - Farm, and Black Mabb avan storage Developed Land relict hotel (Zone 1) Drainage employment site with potential for further development that employment proposed for for housing Proposed for Lynderswood Notley and Greenfield should be recognised by formal allocation in the new Local uses housing employment Lane, Upper Plan. It is further submitted that the boundary of the uses London Road designated employment area should be drawn as delineated on the accompanying site plan to include, the existing employment units (Located at centre of area), existing open storage (northern part of area), proposed new employment units (next to existing site entrance at southern end of area).

BLAN117 N/A N/A Rear of Green N/A Nr Great Notley Great Notley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr B Clarke Mr M N/A 0.38 Garden land Greenfield Countryside N/A Urban Access from Pickpocket None Flat Low probability Existing surface None None None None (previously included in BLA5 without owners knowledge) The None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Gables, 215 and Black Jackson, and residential Pickpocket Lane is PRWO (Zone 1) water discharge site is flat, defined by post and rail fencing and close boarded boundary included in London Road, Notley Mark Jackson Lane Byway 3 fencing. It forms part of the garden of number 215 London amendment current strategy Braintree Planning Road. The site overlooks the wider area of land promoted would be could be under reference BLA5. The site is flat and contains a large required considered aviary. Access if developed separately from a wider under new Local allocation, can be taken from Pickpocket Lane, a designated Plan public highway. Our opinion is that 10 dwellings or thereabouts could be accommodated on the site independently of as part of a wider scheme. There is a reasonable separation distance between the rear of the existing London Road properties and existing mature landscape treatment, This will allow for the provision of smaller dwellings which would accord with the evidence base of the SHMA 2014 and current advice of the Braintree Council Housing Enabling Officer. Development has occurred and is proposed to the rear of these houses; this has helped set a precedent for further similar depth development such as this site. CAS4A N/A N/A Land at Sudbury Castle Hedingham Other Village Yes Site Allocations Mr J Lindsay N/A N/A 0.75 Currently in use Greenfield Residential N/A Urban St James Street No None Flat Low probability Yes Conservation SMR_6783 No Site is used for Current discusions ongoing with parish council. PC happy to None None No None 23 Y Y Y Current use Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hill, Bailey Hedingham and for recreation (Zone 1) Area recreation but not move recreation ground to alternative location. needs to included in Street Development (majority) owned by parish relocate current strategy Management council could be Plan considered under new Local Plan OVIN402 Land north of Ovington Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Barry None None 0.3 Private Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A PROW to None Flat Low probability Existing None (Two None (Opposite No None People have lived on the site for over a hundred years prior None None No None 4 N Y Y Development Site is below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Site is below REMOVED Upper Farm North Bowyer Recreation easern (Zone 1) Grade II Listed SMR_7005/700 to the cottage being burnt down in the early 1950's, a number boundary threhold for threshold below threshold boundary buildings 6) of footprints of bulidings shown on previous maps of the site. amendment inclusion in the opposite the would be SHLAA site) required

Page 16 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

PANF345 Land at Ivy Hall, Panfield Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr A Paul Mrs Gillian N/A 8.81 House/domestic Previously Countryside/re N/A N/A Existing Adjacent None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None It is a sustainable, edge of village location, with good access None N/A No None 220 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Kynaston Road, Village Davidson /outbuildings, Developed Land sidential available and (Zone 1) from Kynaston Road and is close to existing services and boundary included in Panfield, stables and and Greenfield potentially facilities, including public transport. The sites are amendment current strategy Braintree, CM7 barn through developeable and deliverable and would make suitable site would be could be 5BE Thistledown or allocations for residential/mixed use development. required considered from main under new Local access to Plan PANF346 Land at Ivy Hall, Panfield Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr A Paul Mrs Gillian N/A 2.54 Maintained Greenfield Countryside/re N/A N/A Existing Adjacent None Flat Low probability Existing Noe None None None As above None N/A No None 63 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Kynaston Road, village Davidson open land, sidential available and (Zone 1) boundary included in Panfield, maintained as potentially amendment current strategy Braintree, CM7 part of Ivy Hall through would be could be 5BE curtilage. Thistledown or required considered from main under new Local access to Plan property PANF347 PAN2 Land at Ivy Hall, Panfield Three Fields Adjacent Other No Site Allocations Mr A Paul Mrs Gillian N/A 1.32 Scrub land Greenfield Countryside/re N/A N/A Existing Adjacent None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None As above None N/A No None 33 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Kynaston Road, Village and Davidson sidential available and (Zone 1) boundary included in Panfield, Development potentially amendment current strategy Braintree, CM7 Management through would be could be 5BE Plan Thistledown or required considered from main under new Local access to Plan property PANF516 Kynaston Farm Panfield Three Fields adjacent other No Call for Sites Executors Mr Christoper N/A 0.37 Redundant Greenfield Countryside/re N/A N/A Existing No None Flat Low probability Existing Adj listed None None None The land lies in a reasonably sustainable location on the edge None N/A No None 9 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (Site 1), village Loon agricultural sidential farmyard (Zone 1) building of a village, key road junction, adjacent to the village and is in boundary included in Kynaston Road, buildings and access with walking distance to local facilities and there is a regular bus amendment current strategy Panfield, Essex yard, fringe land dropped kerb service to Braintree. The land is available, comprising a would be could be direct off redundant farmyard and related land. Development of the right required considered Kynaston Road scale would be suitable for this village location. under new Local Plan

PANF517 Kynaston Farm Panfield Three Fields Adjacent other No Call for Sites Executors Mr Christoper N/A 3 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/re N/A N/A Existing No None Flat Low probability Existing Small part of None None None As above None N/A No None 75 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (Site 2), village Loon sidential farmyard (Zone 1) site adjacent to boundary included in Kynaston Road, access with curtilage of amendment current strategy Panfield, Essex dropped kerb listed building. would be could be direct off required considered Kynaston Road under new Local Plan PANF518 Kynaston Farm Panfield Three Fields Adjacent other No Call for Sites Executors Mr Christoper N/A 2.98 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/re N/A N/A Existing No None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None As above None N/A No None 74 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (Site 3), village Loon sidential farmyard (Zone 1) boundary included in Kynaston Road, access with amendment current strategy Panfield, Essex dropped kerb would be could be direct off required considered Kynaston Road under new Local Plan

PANF519 Kynaston Farm Panfield Three Fields Adjacent other No Call for Sites Executors Mr Christoper N/A 5.65 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/re N/A N/A Existing No None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None As above None None No None 141 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A (Site 4), village Loon sidential farmyard (Zone 1) boundary included in Kynaston Road, access with amendment current strategy Panfield, Essex dropped kerb would be could be direct off required considered Kynaston Road under new Local Plan

PEBM348 Cornerways, Pebmarsh The Colnes Adjacent Other No Site Allocations Mr Andrew None None 0.3 None Greenfield Countryside/re N/A N/A Yes None None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None This site would be a sensible use of an existing resource None None No None 1 Y Y Y Development Below threshold 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Crossways, Village and Stimpson and sidential (Zone 1) representing sustainable development and therefore not boundary threshold below threshold Pebmarsh Development Mr M J contrary to Core Strategy. There is a presumption in favour of amendment Management Stimpson development. would be Plan required PEBM349 Land between Pebmarsh The Colnes Adjacent Other No Site Allocations Chelmsford Mr Hayley 0.25 1 Y Y Y Development Below threshold 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED village hall and Village and Diocesan Board Morley, boundary threshold below threshold St john Baptist Development of Finance amendment Church, Management would be Pebmarsh Plan required PEBM350 Land west of Pebmarsh The Colnes Adjacent other No Call for Sites Mr J Nott Mr Andy 0.36 3 Y Y Y Below threshold 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Kingsmead village Butcher threshold below threshold PEBM351 Land at Oak Pebmarsh The Colnes Adjacent other No Call for Sites Mr D P Nott Mr Edward 0.84 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/re N/A N/A Oak Road Adjacent to None Flat Low probability Soakaway None None NOne None The release of land as proposed at Pebmarsh would provide a None None None None 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Road, village Gittins sidential north boundary (Zone 1) small new site for village housing that is well-related to boundary included in Pebmarsh existing development. The site has good defensible amendment current strategy boundaries to the north in the form of Oak Farm and Oak would be could be Farm Cottages and of existing field hedgerows. A new required considered hedgerow with hedgerow trees would be planted along the under new Local rear boundary such that development would not cause Plan material harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside. The site could make a small contribution to the stock of rural housing and to affordable housing provision within the village.

PEBM352 Former playing Pebmarsh The Colnes adjacent other No Call for Sites Mr J Nott Mr Andy 1.1 Former football Greenfield Countryside/re N/A N/A Clay Hills adjacent to None Flat Low probability N/A None None None None There are no infrastructure constraints or amenity issues that None None None None 20 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A field at Clays village Butcher playing field with sidential north boundary (Zone 1) would prevent development. the land is not in intensive boundary included in Hills, Pebmarsh vacant pavilion agricultural use and having been previously used for amendment current strategy recreation is unlikely to be of high quality to warrant protection would be could be for agricultural use. required considered under new Local Plan PENT353 N/A N/A Land adj Paines N/A Pentlow Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr David Mr Peter N/A 0.02 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B4) From Belchamp None None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None Adjacent to existing dwellings. Access to the site would be None N/A No None 2 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Manor Cottage North Daniels Philbin, and residential high sensitivity Road (Zone 1) capable of delivering a good visibility splay. amendment included in threshold below threshold Philbin to change) would be current strategy. Champion required Not considered Associates to be sustainable location, unlikely to be included in new Local Plan.

PENT354 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Pentlow Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr David Mr Peter N/A 0.1 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B4) From School FP17/PROW None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None Within a village speed limit area of 30mph. Access to the site None N/A No N/A 8 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A School Road North Daniels Philbin, and residential high sensitivity Road 102_17 eastern (Zone 1) would be capable of delivering a good visibility splay. amendment included in (adj Clare Philbin to change) boundary would be current strategy Cottage) Champion required could be Associates considered under new Local Plan RAYN355 Part RAY2, N/A Land East of Land between Rayne Rayne Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Not Known Gladman N/A 8.7 Agricultural Greenfield Edge of Medium - Low 19b From School Yes None Relatively Flat Low probability Yes Two listed Archaeological None No The site is located on the edge of a their 3 settlement. The None None No None 45 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A includes School Road Rayne, Great Village / Developments Land village/adj Road (Zone 1) buildings significance not site is located within close proximity of key services and boundary included in RAY8X Notley and Countryside Ltd A120 located adjacent known facilities. There are no known constraints. amendment current strategy Braintree to the eastern SMR6537 would be could be boundary of the required considered site. under new Local Plan RAYN555 Land R/O Rayne Rayne Adjacent other No SHLAA 2015 TBC Mr Edward N/A 0.5 Curtilage of pub Previously Residential/Re N/A N/A Shalford Road None TPO on Flat Low probability TBC Adjacent to Adjacent to None No None None No None 8 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A The Swan village Gittins Developed Land sidenital adjacent (Zone 1) grade II listed SMR_6502 boundary included in PH Rayne and Greenfield curtilage buuildings, and amendment current strategy part within would be could be conservation required considered area. under new Local Plan N/A RID1 26 Land rear of N/A Ridgewell Stour Valley Other Village Yes/No Site Allocations Michams Brian N/A 0.6 Commercial Previously Countryside, (Moderate to (B4/B2) From Chapel None Individual TPOs Relatively Flat Low probability Conservation None None None N/A Land allocated N/A No N/A 5 Y Y Y Site identified 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 No N/A Site not Kings Head PH North and Christian, workshops Developed Land residential, high sensitivity Road on western (Zone 1) area/adj for for housing in resubmitted Chapel Road Development Building public house to change / boundary conservation residential/empl ADMP under Cfs Management Surveyor relatively high area, behind oyment use in Plan sensitivity to Grade II Listed ADMP change) buildings on Chapel Road RIDG356 RID5X N/A Pineside, Ashen N/A Ridgewell Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Derek Mr Michael Mr Derek 0.18 Builders yard Previously Residential (Moderate to (B4/B2) From Ashen None None Relatively Flat Low probability Yes None None None Current use The [builder yard] is a non-conforming use and has the None N/A No N/A 5 Y Y Y Development Current use Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Road, Ridgewell North Village Mason Aves, Mason, D Developed Land high sensitivity Road (Zone 1) needs to relocate potential to cause disturbance and disruption by general boundary needs to included in Planning Mason to change / activity and traffic generation (including HGVs). The site amendment relocate current strategy, Consultant Developments relatively high adjoins existing housing on its SW and NW sides and is would be PDL, could be Ltd sensitivity to opposite more housing which runs along Ashen Road for required considered change) some 170m beyond the site boundary. The site is eminently under new Local suited to well-designed housing. Plan Until the late 1980s the site formed part of the garden of Brentley House, and has been used as a builder's yard for more than 30 years; it became the sole use more than 10 years ago. The site is thus a previously-developed site. The site is well screened on its boundaries by trees and hedges, although there are no trees of any value or interest within the site. There is no wildlife interest either. It is generally level, with no known physical constraints on development. The existing site access could be repositioned if necessary, and good sight lines could be achieved. The site is centrally located within the village and within walking distance of the village school, pubs and playing field.

RIDG357 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Ridgewell Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Not Known John Finch Granville 2.31 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B4/B2) From Drury FP28/PROW None Relatively Flat Low probability Ditch system Adj Archaeological None None Immediately developable None N/A No N/A 46 Y Y Y Development Achievability of Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Drury Lane, North Village Partnership Developments and residential high sensitivity Lane , (currently 104_28 (Zone 1) conservation significance not boundary access to be included in south of Chapel to change / subject to northern area at SW known amendment confirmed current strategy Road Relatively high agreement) boundary, corner SMR6974 would be could be sensitivity to FP11/PROW required considered change) 104_11 eastern under new Local boundary Plan RIDG358 RID6X N/A Land at Hall N/A Ridgewell Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites St Johns Mr Will Lusty, N/A 1.3 Vacant fields Greenfield Countryside, (Moderate to (B4/B2) From Hall Lane None None Relatively Flat Low probability Adj Archaeological None None As part of our representations in March 2014, we reviewed None N/A No N/A 25 Y Y Y Development Liaison with Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Lane, Ridgewell North Village College Associate residential, high sensitivity (Zone 1) conservation significance not the report to the Council’s Local Development Framework Sub- boundary ECC Highways included in (Cambridge) Planner, church, LoWS to change / area at northern known Committee on 13 June 2013 concerning the representations amendment re. access current strategy Savills (UK) Relatively high boundary and SMR7059/7060 that we had previously submitted to the Draft version of the would be could be Ltd sensitivity to Grade II listed Plan. The officer comments in relation to our client’s land required considered change) Rectory (Council reference RID6X) remarked that: under new Local “Hall Lane is completely unsuitable for additional traffic as it is Plan an extremely narrow single track lane which is constrained by existing properties. As such development here is not supported”. These were the only grounds on which our client’s site was discounted in the report to the Local Development Framework Sub-Committee on 13 June 2013. In view of these officer comments, our client commissioned Cannon Consulting Engineers to prepare an Access Appraisal, which is attached to this representation at Appendix 2. The report concludes that: “It is considered that there is justification for a small residential development at Hall Farm. Suitable access for up to 25 dwellings could be provided subject to the local highway authority agreeing that the existing 60m of narrow road can be managed in such a way as to provide for safe access and egress including emergency access”. In view of Cannon’s findings, we consider that a development of up to 25 dwellings can be suitably accessed from Hall Lane. As such, we consider that the detailed work undertaken by Cannon has demonstrated that the officers’ reasoning is not robust grounds for discounting the Hall Lane site.

RIDG359 N/A N/A Land on N/A Ridgewell Stour Valley Adjacent Other Yes/No Call for Sites Mrs Susan N/A N/A 0.79 Uncultivated Greenfield Countryside, (Moderate to (B4/B2) From Ashen None None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None The site is clear and available for development immediately. Land included N/A No N/A 19 Y Y Y Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A southeast side North Village Lewin field residential, high sensitivity Road (Zone 1) within development Ashen Road farm to change / development boundary in (opp. Bowles relatively high boundary in ADMP and has Farm) sensitivity to ADMP no other change) allocations RIDG520 RID3 N/A Land rear of 8 N/A Ridgewell Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Faris Barlow N/A N/A 0.25 Garden land Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B4/B2) Through FP11/PROW None Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None Site adjacent to RIDG357 could provide primary or secondary None N/A No N/A 6 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Colne Springs, North Village and residential high sensitivity curtilage of no.8 104_11 (Zone 1) road access and be considered in conjunction with RIDG357. boundary included in Ridgewell to change / amendment current strategy relatively high would be could be sensitivity to required considered change) under new Local Plan

Page 17 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

RIVE362 Land adjoining Rivenhall Silver End and Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Chelmsford Mrs Hayley N/A 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Proposed for REMOVE Burghey Brook Cressing Town Diocesan Board Morley, employment Proposed for Poultry Farm, of Finance Associate employment Eastways, Planner, Strutt uses Waterside and Parker Business Park, Witham RIVE363 Burghey Brook Rivenhall Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites CML Mr William N/A 6.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Proposed for REMOVE Farm, London Cressing Village Microsystems Allwood, employment Proposed for Road, Rivenhall, PLC Associate employment Witham, Essex, Town uses CM8 3HA Planning

RIVE364 Essex County Rivenhall Silver End and Countryside Yes Site Allocations Essex County Mr John N/A 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Proposed for REMOVE Council Fire and Cressing and Fire and Collins, Fire and PROPOSED Rescue HQ Development Rescue Service Planning Rescue HQ FOR FIRE AND Management Director RESCUE HQ Plan RIVE365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Proposed for REMOVE employment Proposed for employment uses RIVE367 N/A N/A Church Road N/A Rivenhall Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Henry Miss Kate N/A 12.7 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside N/A (A9) From Oak Road FP38/PROW None Not significant Majority Low None None None None None None N/A No N/A 318 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Cressing Village Siggers Jennings, and residential 105_38 crosses probability amendment included in Whirledge & site (Zone 1), Zone would be current strategy Nott 2/3 NE required could be boundary considered under new Local Plan RIVE368 N/A N/A Oak Road N/A Rivenhall Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Henry Miss Kate N/A 7.7 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside N/A (A9) From Oak Road FP48/PROW None Not significant Majority Low None Archaeological Prbte20 None None None N/A No N/A 193 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Cressing Siggers Jennings, and 105_48 adj NE probability significance not Landfills and amendment and included in Whirledge & residential, boundary (Zone 1), Zone known other waste development current strategy Nott railway line adj 2/3 NE SMR8365 disposal boundary would could be SE corner boundary be required considered under new Local Plan RIVE369 N/A N/A Land at Henry N/A Rivenhall End Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Henry Miss Kate N/A 24.9 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, N/A (A9) From Oak Road FP45/PROW None Not significant Majority Low None None None Major gas outer None None N/A No N/A 623 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Dixon Road Cressing Siggers Jennings, residential, 105_45, probability zone amendment and included in (North of A12) Whirledge & railway, A12 FP46/PROW (Zone 1), Zone development current strategy Nott 105_46 2/3 SW boundary would could be boundary be required considered under new Local Plan RIVE370 N/A N/A Land at Henry N/A Rivenhall End Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Henry Miss Kate N/A 7.4 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, N/A (A9) From Oak Road None None Not significant Low probability None Archaeological None None None None N/A No N/A 185 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Dixon Road Cressing Siggers Jennings, residential, (Zone 1), Zone significance not amendment and included in (South of A12) Whirledge & A12 2/3 adj NE known SMR development current strategy Nott corner 8102 boundary would could be be required considered under new Local Plan RIVE521 Land and N/A Nr Silver End Silver End and Countryside No Call for Sites The Booths Mr John Rose N/A 0.77 Redundant Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A Park Gate Road None None Flat Low probability Soakway None None Unknown It is considered that the comprehensive redevelopment of the None N/A No No 15 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site is isolated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A buildings off Cressing Charities agricultural and residential (Zone 1) site for residential purposes, making use of those existing amendment and from built up Park Gate buildings and traditional buildings capable of being converted to residential development areas. Site not Road, Silver yard use, toghether with the redevelopment for residential boundary would included in End, Essex purposes (at an appropriate density and in appropriate form) be required current strategy of that part of the site occupied by the larger grain stores and but could be silos, will together provide significant social, economic and considered environmental benefits, without giving rise to any significant under new Local and demonstrable harm. Plan.

SHAL371 Land west of Shalford Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Timothy N/A N/A 10.75 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A Braintree Road None None Flat Low probability Existing None None Possible Ransom strip of None None N/A No No 268 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Braintree Road Village Goodchild and residential (Zone 1) (Adjacent to Stonefield boundary included in (Levelly Field), contaminated amendment current strategy Shalford Church site) would be could be End required considered under new Local Plan SHAL372 Grubbs Cottage, Shalford Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mrs Peggy Mrs Julie N/A 0.085 2 Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A REMOVE Below Church End, Village Blackwell Barnes threshold threshold Shalford

SHAL373 Land R/O Pent Shalford Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Neil Warwick None N/A 0.4 Stables, Barn Greenfield Residential, N/A N/A The Street Adjacent on TPO adjacent to sloped Low probability None at present Adjacent Grade Unknown None Historic right of None N/A No No 14 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A House, The Village and paddock church and northern and site (Zone 1) I church way for now boundary included in Street Shalford countryside southern retiered farmer amendment current strategy boundary only, due to would be could be former family link required considered with previous under new Local owner prior to Plan 1998. This relates t a very short link at one end of site adjacent to boundary wall. This has been fenced off since 1998 and no right of way ever either required or exercised.

SHAL374 Adj Gables, Shalford Three Fields adjacent other No Call for Sites Mssrs William Mr Richard N/A 0.1378 4 Below threshold 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVE Below Braintree Road, village and Adam Mabb threshold threshold Shlaford, Church End. SHAL375 White Court, Shalford Three Fields Other Village Yes Site Allocations Mr and Mrs L & Mr Chris N/A 0.67 4 Below threshold 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVE Below Braintree Road, and H Jaggard- Loon, threshold threshold Church End, Development Legerton Director Shalford, Essex, Management CM7 5HF Plan

N/A N/A 45 Builders Yard N/A Shalford Three Fields Other Village Yes Planning George Tanner Mr James N/A 0.49 Builders yard Previously Countryside (Relatively high (A5) From Braintree None None Not significant Low probability None None None N/A Planning 09/01116/FUL Yes Under 9 Y Y Y Site has 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 8 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Braintree Road Permission (Shalford) Ltd Rudd, Hollins Developed Land and residential sensitivity to Road (Zone 1) Permission construction planning Cfs Architects & change) permission for Surveyors housing N/A SIB2A 120a N/A Premdor site, Sible Hedingham Hedingham Key Service Yes Core Strategy Bloor Homes N/A Bloor Homes 12.87 Industry, Previously Industrial, N/A Urban Access from None LoWS Bra117 Parts of site Adj Grade II Archaeological Unidentified Regeneration N/A Planning 13/00416/FUL - Yes 75 built 193 Y Y Y Site has 0 55 60 58 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Station Road, Village Eastern Eastern Industrial Developed Land residential Station Road Hedingham within Flood listed buildings significance not landfill on site allocation in Core Permission PER106 planning Cfs Sible premises and Swan Station Marsh Zone 2 and 3 known SMR Strategy 2011 permission for Hedingham Street 6817 housing N/A SIB2A 120b N/A Rockways site, Sible Hedingham Hedingham Key Service Yes Core Strategy Mr Frank N/A N/A 0.9 Industry, Previously Industrial, N/A Urban Access from None adj LoWS Parts of site None Archaeological Bte201 Regeneration N/A Planning 14/00688/OUT - No N/A 38 Y Y Y Discharge of Site has 0 0 0 4 10 10 14 38 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Station Road, Village Ladkin, St Giles Industrial Developed Land residential Station Road Bra117 within Flood significance not gasworks allocation in Core Permission PER106 planning planning Cfs Sible Development premises Hedingham Zone 2 and 3 known SMR Strategy 2011 conditions permission for Hedingham Ltd Station Marsh 6817 housing

N/A SIB4 N/A N/A Land adjacent Sible Hedingham Hedingham Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr DJ and Mr G Pannell N/A 0.27 Vacant land Greenfield Countryside N/A Urban Access from FP55/PROW None Generally Flat Low probability Conservation None None None Residential development. The site forms a natural infill None N/A No N/A 7 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in 14 Swan Street Service Village RHA Pannell and residential Swan Street 107_55 (Zone 1) area between existing developments along Swan Street. boundary included in Cfs amendment current strategy would be could be required considered under new Local Plan N/A SIB7 121 N/A R/o 107-109 Sible Hedingham Hedingham Key Service Yes Planning Kaizen Finance Mr P Watson, Bury 0.43 Retail, storage, Previously Residential N/A Urban Access from None None Generally Flat Low probability None None None None N/A Planning 11/00650/FUL Yes Now under 12 Y Y Y Site has 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Swan Street Village Permission Ltd C/o Birketts Philips Investments open land Developed Land Swan Street (Zone 1) Permission construction planning Cfs (Cooper's Yard) LLP Planning LLP permission for Services Ltd housing

N/A SIB8 N/A N/A Builder's Yard Sible Hedingham Hedingham Key Service Yes Site Allocations Shirley Radley N/A N/A 0.41 Storage and Previously Residential N/A Urban Access from FP37/107_37 TPO 09/07 - T1 Flat Low probability None None None None Landonwer is willing to develope the site. None N/A No N/A 5 Y Y Y Current use A suitable Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Site owner has and backlands Village and open land (Open Developed Land Parkfields along access on site (Zone 1) needs to access would development contact the north of Development space and track and part of boundary relocate need to be boundary and Council and Alexandra Road Management garage. northern achieved. has no other indicated they Plan Occupied but in boundary allocations are still willing to varying develope the condition) site (2015). N/A N/A 69 Adj the Village N/A Sible Hedingham Hedingham Key Service Yes Planning Harvester N/A N/A 0.44 Vacant Greenfield Village Hall, N/A Urban From St Peters None None Not significant Low probability Conservation None None N/A Planning 04/01469/FUL Yes Nearing 7 Y Y Y Site has 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Hall Village Permission Homes residential View (Zone 1) area permission completion planning Cfs permission for housing N/A N/A 139 165 Swan N/A Sible Hedingham Hedingham Key Service Yes Planning Dr A Nezami Mr Osa N/A 0.18 Former garage Previously Residential, N/A Urban From Swan None None Not significant Zone 2 None None None N/A Planning 14/00335/FUL No Initial notice 9 Y Y Y Site has 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Street Village Permission Eguavoen, site Developed Land library Street Permission received planning Cfs Sustain permission for Renewable housing Ltd SIBH376 Land adj 14 Sible Hedingham Hedingham Adjacent Key No SHLAA 2010 Mr R & DJ Miss Gemma N/A 0.27 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A Swan Street Adjacent on None Low probabilty Conservation Unknown Unknown Unknown None None No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Swan Street, Service Village Pannell Pannell and residential nothern (Zone 1) area boundary included in Sible boundary amendment current strategy Hedingham would be could be required considered under new Local Plan SIBH377 SIB3 N/A Former Tanners Land at former Sible Hedingham Hedingham Adjacent Key Yes Call for Sites Housebyers Mr Andrew TBC 2.2 Vacant Previously Countryside N/A Urban Access from Byway None Generally Flat Low probability Existing None None Low Commercial The dairy was closed in 2006 has been vacant ever since, a None N/A No N/A 75 Y Y Y ADMP Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Dairy, Prayors dairy, Oxford Service Village / Farming Limited Watt, Partner, employment Developed Land and residential Prayors Hill 31/PROW (Zone 1) connections on contamination leisure/business period of 8 years. The property has been marketed by allocation included in Hill, Sible Lane Countryside Leo Group Ltd MAZE land, former 107_31 (Oxford site risk from uses allocation in Jocelyne Chase, commencing in August 2010. There has amendment current strategy, Hedingham Planning dairy production Lane) north and historic ADMP been no interest in it for employment use. It is clear, in the would be PDL, could be Solutions and storage eastern employment light of the advice in NPPF paragraph 22, and having regard required considered buildings boundaries uses. Site to marketing evidence and the independent assessment by under new Local investigation LSH that there is no reasonable prospect of the site being Plan report, used for employment purposes in the future, so it should be Resource & released from that use. Environmental An alternative allocation would assist the early regeneration Consultants Ltd, of the site given that there is no reasonable prospect of it June 2013, being re-used for employment or some other commercial report reference purpose in the future. The Dairy neighbours existing housing, 51394/R1.1 adjoins the existing village envelope of Sible Hedingham and there are well established links to the core of the village along Oxford Lane, a formally recognised ‘Green Lane’.

SIBH378 Sible Hedingham Hedingham Adjacent key No Call for Sites Mr Andrew 2.78 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, N/A N/A Church Street None None Slopes north to Low probability Adjacent Unknown No None A small, low denity housing scheme would secure otehr wider None N/A No N/A 18 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A service village Martin residenital, south (Zone 1) conservation benefits by cross subsidising their delivery. The landowners included in church area have discussed with Sible Hedingham PC about the potential current strategy for community facilities, such as a car park for the church or could be allotments, considered under new Local Plan SIBH379 N/A N/A 38-40 Alderford N/A Sible Hedingham Hedingham Key Service Yes/No Call for Sites Claire Du Feu, N/A N/A 0.25 Residential, Previously Residential N/A Urban From Alderford None None Not significant Existing dwelling Conservation None None The site stands opposite the ancient Alderford Mill in one of None N/A No N/A 5 Y Y Y Development FRA would be Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Flood Zone 2 REMOVED Street Village / Adj Key Director, H J Office Block and Developed Land and Street Zone 1, majority area, adj listed the most attractive areas in Sible Hedingham. Development boundary required from Heritage included in Flood Zone 2 Service Village Rawlinson garages used countryside Zone 2, and buildings of this brownfield site to residential status would enhance the amendment Specialists current strategy and 3 Limited for storage some 3 area as well as providing a number of homes. would be could be The site is within good proximity and walking distance of the required considered village shops, local transport, and postal services. under new Local Access to the site from Alderford Street is excellent. A Plan tasteful and sympathetic development of this important village site would upgrade the immediate area and will ensure a future for one of the oldest and outstandingly beautiful areas of the village.

SIBH380 N/A N/A Land at Queen Sible Hedingham Hedingham Countryside No Call for Sites H Bethell Esq Mr Andy N/a 1.1 Paddock Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A A1017 Along southern None Slight rise to Low probability Three listed Unknown None None The identification of the site for development would accord None N/A No N/A 6 N Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Street (Between Butcher, boundary main road (Zone 1) buildings in with the existing spatial strategy policy of the Core Strategy boundary included in no.s 16 and 42) Associate cloase proximity to concentrate new development in the main towns and key amendment current strategy Sible Partner and part within service villages. The provision of open space would provide would be could be Hedingham conservation natural green space within the development. required considered area. under new Local Plan SIBH381 Land at Sible Hedingham Hedingham Adj Key Service No Call for Sites Messrs Piers Mr Jim Bailey 1.6 Access road, Previously Countryside N/A N/A Alderford Street None TPO Area to Flat Low probability SUDS Part within SMR_6948 Unknown None It is considered that the site is suitable and available for None N/A No N/A 26 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Alderford Village von Berg and garage block, Developed Land and residenital front (Zone 1) conservation residential development in the next 5 years, and it should be boundary included in Matings William Ripper outbuildings and and Greenfield area. allocated for devlopment in the emerging local plan. amendment current strategy open land. would be could be required considered under new Local Plan

Page 18 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

N/A SIL6 35 N/A Crittall Works & Silver End Silver End and Key Service Yes Core Strategy The Finishing N/A N/A 0.47 Print works Previously Residential N/A Urban Access from None None Flat Low probability Conservation None None None N/A None N/A No N/A 20 Y Y Y Seek advice Regeneration 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in The Old Print Cressing Village Company Ltd (vacant) Developed Land Boars Tye road (Zone 1) area from heritage site identified in Cfs - Finishing Works (now the (LHG Group) specialists Core Strategy, Company site Finishing discussions Company, Unit between 1 Western owners/officers Road), Silver ongoing End N/A SIL7 31 N/A Car Park, Silver End Silver End and Key Service Yes Planning Mr Michael Mr Olivier Mr Michael 0.41 Scrubland Previously Residential N/A Urban Access off None None Flat Low probability Adj Grade II None None None N/A Planning 07/02612/FUL No Start made on 12 Y Y Y Discharge of Site has 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Sheepcoates Cressing Village Permission Esfandi, Dwyer Spencer, Esfandi, Dwyer (Former cap Developed Land sheepcotes (Zone 1) listed building, Permission access. Site planning planning Cfs Lane Asset Andrew Martin Asset park at rear of Lane conservation recently sold conditions permission for Management Planning Ltd Management residential - area to new housing Plc Plc gated off) developer. N/A SIL9 N/A N/A Nordic Timber Silver End Silver End and Key Service Yes SHLAA 2010 Nordic Timber N/A N/A 0.35 Timber Yard Previously Residential/All N/A Urban Access of None None Flat Low Probability Existing Grade II listed None Yes Unknown None None N/A No N/A 10 Y N Y Current use Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in site Cressing Village Developed Land otments Boars Tye Road (Zone 1) building and needs to development Cfs conservation relocate boundary and area has no other allocations SILV383 SIL5 N/A Garden Field, N/A Silver End Silver End and Key Service No Call for Sites Mr Alan Jordon, N/A N/A 2.598 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Urban/Medium Urban/3a From Western FP23/PROW None Relatively level Low probability Agricultural land None None None None The site is within approximately 200m of the Western Arms None N/A No N/A 64 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Adj 65 Western Cressing Village Lead Trustee, and residential Low Road 108_23 S (Zone 1) drains Public House, just over 500m from the local primary school boundary included in Road L.A. Jordon boundary and it is under 10 minutes walk to the village centre, including amendment current strategy 1989 Rivenhall the co-operative store and Post Office. All of these can be would be could be Settlement accessed via safe pedestrian routes. required considered Frequent bus services run part the site. under new Local Close proximity to towns of Witham and Braintree . Plan The site is relatively visually self contained from the road. The site has the potential to be laid out in a manner which would safeguard the amenities of adjoining residents and would protect the character and appearance of the area.

SILV384 N/A N/A Whiteheads N/A Silver End Silver End and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr John Stacey Miss Kate N/A 5 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Urban/Medium Urban/3d From Western FP20/PROW None Not significant Majority low None None None None None None N/A No N/A 125 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Farm, Cressing Cressing Service Village Jennings, school, Lane 108_20 adj SE probability boundary included in Road, Silver Whirledge & residential boundary (Zone 1), small amendment current strategy End Nott area Zone 2/3 would be could be SW boundary required considered under new Local Plan SILV385 SIL1 N/A Land to west of N/A Silver End Silver End and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Christopher Mr John N/A 2.2 Much of the site Previously Countryside Urban/Medium Urban/1a Boars Tye None None Flat Low probability N/A N/A None None The existing The site has obvious residential development potential, Planning 15/01004/OUT No N/A 60 Y Y Y Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Boars Tye Road Cressing Service Village Clark, Adams, is leased as a Developed Land and residential Low Road, CEMEX (Zone 1) tenant is subject bounded by existing residential on two sides and with the Permission boundary Development Partner, paddock and and Greenfield have a reserved to a one month other two well-screened by planted woodland and hedges. It amendment Manager, Deloitte Real includes a small right to notice period. A is also partially previously developed land. would be CEMEX UK Estate stable. construct a road low KV cable Suitable vehicular access could be achieved either via Wood required Properties Ltd including crosses the site Grove, or directly from Boars Tye Road. footpaths on a north-south There is the potential for significant biodiversity gains. between Wood axis. The site could potentially be developed in the next five years, Grove and the and is considered to be more achievable over this timescale subject area than alternative residential sites in Silver End. SILV386 N/A N/A Land on the N/A Silver End Silver End and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Robert N/A Mr Robert 2.251 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 2a From Boars Tye None None Flat Low probability None None None The site is a natural infill for Silver End. None N/A No N/A 56 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A east side of Cressing Service Village Speakman Scott, and residential Road (Zone 1) We will be engaging with the local parish to see if they have boundary included in Boards Tye Developments any requirements for community facilities that would benefit amendment current strategy Road, Between Manager, Scott the local community. would be could be Rolphs Properties There are sites that have been identified for development or required considered Cottages and would be suitable alternatives for development in the previous under new Local Bretton, Silver draft site allocations for Silver End. We have explored the Plan End majority of these sites and they have certain constraints that would affect their deliverability.

SILV387 N/A N/A Land at Boars N/A Silver End Silver End and Key Service Yes Call for Sites Mr & Mrs L & J Mr Edward N/A 0.2 Amenity land Greenfield Allotments, N/A Urban Via existing None None Flat Low probability Soakaway Conservation None None None The site lies within the Silver End Settlement Boundary and is None N/A No N/A 5 Y Y Y Seek advice Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Tye (adj) Cressing Village Putterford & Gittins, residential, private (Zone 1) area and adj accessed via a private drive under the control of the from Landscape from heritage included in Allotment Boulton Chartered timber yard driveway off listed buildings Landowners. The site is an undeveloped and overgrown Svs specialists current strategy gardens, Silver Town Planner, Boars Tye Road backland area lying between the existing care home and the could be End Edward which also Silver End playing fields and allotments. The site contains considered Gittins & serves the certain feature trees and planting which would be retained to under new Local Associates Boars Tye Care achieve an arcadian setting for up to four detached dwellings. Plan Home The layout and landscaping will ensure that the setting of the adjoining Listed Farmhouse complex is respected and enhanced.

The use of the site for a limited housing development would contribute to the housing stock in this Key Service Village in a sustainable way and without encroaching on the countryside setting of the village.

SILV388 SIL6 35 Crittall Works, Crittall Works & Silver End Silver End and Key Service Yes Core Strategy Parham Mrs Lisa N/A 3.38 Former factory Previously Residential N/A Urban Access from None None Flat Low probability Connect to Conservation None Initial survey Need to retain This site is at the centre of a Key Service Village and has None N/A No N/A 80 Y Y Y Seek advice Regeneration 0 0 0 0 15 45 0 60 0 0 0 0 No N/A Silver End The Old Print Cressing Village Holdings Ltd Skinner, site with vacant Developed Land Boars Tye (Zone 1) existing area already carried beech hedges been vacant for several years. Concrete foundations of the from heritage site identified in Works (now the Director WYG buildings on the Road, Temple systems out and historic former factory buildings cover the majority of the site and only specialists Core Strategy, Finishing land and Lane and garden. a small area of buildings in the north east corner of the site discussions Company, Unit significant Valentine Way Retention of remain. Whilst these buildings are located within the between 1 Western areas of hard historic factory Conservation Area, this designation only controls the owners/officers Road), Silver surfacing buildings, demolition of the buildings. To bring this site forward for ongoing End including Engine development, a practical and pragmatic solution for the Room removal of the remaining buildings on the site with the potential reuse of the Pump House in the north east corner needs to be agreed with the Council. This will allow this site to once again form the heart of the Village and contribute in a positive manner to the future of Silver End. SILV389 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Silver End Silver End and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr D Pummell & N/A Gladman 16.79 Agricultural and Greenfield Countryside Medium - High / 2b/2c From Western None TPO 03/2015 Difference of Low probability Yes Adj listed None Bte545 None The site is located on the edge of a tier 2 settlement (key Application 15/00280/OUT No N/A 350 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Seek advice Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Western Road, Cressing Service Village Mr Speakman Developments paddock and residential Medium - Low Road T1 draft 3m across the (Zone 1) buildings to unknown infill service village). The site is located within close proximity of pending amendment and from Landscape from Heritage included in Silver End Ltd site south key services and facilities. There are no known constraints consideration development Svs Specialists current strategy on site. boundary would could be be required considered under new Local Plan SILV390 N/A N/A Egypts Farm, N/A Silver End Silver End and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Eygpts Farm Ltd N/A Miss Sarah 7.67 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 1a From Boars Tye None None Relatively Flat Low probability Listed building None None None The site within Silver End provides an ideal opportunity to None N/A No N/A 191 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Boars Tye Cressing Service Village Kirk, Planning and residential Road (Zone 1) opp. provide a sustainable extension to a Key Service Village. boundary included in Road, Silver Manager, The site provides an opportunity for residential development amendment current strategy End Persimmon which abuts the existing settlement boundary of a Key would be could be Homes Ltd Service Village. The site abuts existing residential required considered development to the south and opposite the existing residential under new Local properties at Rolphs Farmhouse and cottages. The site does Plan not have any constraints that would hamper its ability to come forward.

SILV524 Land from Silver End Silver End and Adjacent Key No Call for Sites Mr Barry 2.396 Undeveloped Greenfield Residential/Co N/A N/A Magdalene Adjacent None Gentle slope Flood Zone 2/3 Existing Adjacent ot None None Ransom strip 64 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Magdalene Cressing Service Village Kitcherside untryside Crescent to rear of site, conservation boundary included in Crescent majority of site area amendment current strategy low probability would be could be Zone 1. required considered under new Local Plan STEB392 N/A N/A 15 The Endway N/A Steeple Bumpstead Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr David Steele Mr Charles N/A 0.012 Garden land Greenfield Residential (Relatively high (A2) From The None None Relatively Flat Low probability To soakaways Adj Grade II None None None 1. The site is outside the flood zone. None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Bumpstead Village Nash, Charles sensitivity to Endway (Zone 1) Listed property 2. The site is outside the conservation area. boundary included in threshold below threshold Nash Design change) 3. There will be a tangible benefit to the village as it will help amendment current strategy and ensure the viability of local services within Steeple would be could be Management Bumpstead, i.e. the surgery, the Post Office, the Primary required considered Services School and the village stores. under new Local 4. This proposal would not constitute a “greenfield” intrusion Plan of the village into the surrounding countryside due to the existing strongly defined boundaries comprising close boarded fencing and mature hedgerows, separating it from the open farmland beyond. 5. The proposed allocation of the site for housing would not undermine the Governments commitment to the reuse of previously developed land i.e. still leaving the housing provision mainly within urban areas. 6. The land is currently in domestic use, being within the curtilage of 15, The Endway. 7. The property currently enjoys permitted development rights under Class E (a) that would permit the construction of a building covering at least 325 sqm. as shown on the attached drawing numbered DS/3. 8. The proposal would only constitute a very modest extension to the development limits. 9. On extra dwelling would not cause a problem in respect of the disposal of foul sewerage. 10. Planning conditions would ensure the disposal of surface water would be via sustainable means with the flows attenuated to such an extent that there would be no increase in the prospect of flooding created by this development. 11. The present village development limit appears to have been drawn arbitrarily across the garden of 15 The Endway whereas it generally follows, but not slavishly, dwelling curtilage boundaries which would have otherwise encompassed this proposal. 12. The attached drawings illustrate the proposed extension to the development limit together with a suggested form of development comprising a four bedroomed house and double garage. The suggestion still leaves the host dwelling with sufficient space for amenity and parking. 13. This small scale proposal would neither conflict with the Village plan of 2008 nor the thrust of the current Braintree STEB393 N/A N/A Land r/0 48-50 N/A Steeple Bumpstead Other Village Yes Call for Sites Not Known N/A Mr Mark 0.24 Vacant Previously Centre of Urban N/A From North None TPO 12A/02 - Flat All except Conservation None None None The site is currently vacant and available for development. It None 14/00508/FUL - No N/A 10 N Y Y Needs to pass Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Flood Zone 2 REMOVED North Street Bumpstead Mclellan, (buildings from Developed Land village Street T1 on boundary portion of area is a previously developed site within the village envelope of Refused the sequential included in Flood Zone 2 Director, Hatch garage use access in Zone Steeple Bumpstead. The NPPF encourages the reuse of test current strategy, Properties Ltd demolished) 2 brownfield land. The site is of low ecological value. The PDL, could be principle of residential development on the site was accepted considered when 07/00441/OUT was granted. Steeple Bumpstead PC under new Local supported the recent application for dwellings on the site. The Plan council is unable to meet the 5 year housing supply the site should there for be considered for allocation. Not withstanding the sequential test the Environment Agency accepted the conclusion of the FRA. In summary, it is considered that the key constraints in terms of the flood risk and impact on heritage assets could be mitigated and should not be in principle reasons to obstruct development on this site. The site is close to facilities and services and is therefore in a sustainable location.

STEB394 STE2 N/A Land adjacent N/A Steeple Bumpstead Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Robert Mr Paul N/A 0.62 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B3) Via North Street None None Gently slopes Low probability 50% of site in None None None Part of the immediate frontage of the site is also included None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Freezes Barns, Bumpstead Village Suckling Sutton, Head and residential high sensitivity down eastwards (Zone 1) conservation within the designated Conservation boundary from heritage included in North Street of Planning, to change) towards road area, remainder Area of Steeple Bumpstead. However, it is not clear why this amendment specialists current strategy Cheffins adjoining part of the site is included as it has no special architectural or would be could be historic interest in itself, and the boundary does not follow any required considered identifiable physical feature or boundary on the ground. The under new Local existing trees and hedgerow along part of the site frontage Plan could be retained in any residential development of the site, with access into the site being provided opposite the junction with North Street and Freeze’s Barn development.

The site can achieve safe access into and out of the site. A footpath could be provided along the front of the site which would enable safe pedestrian access.

The site is considered to be in a sustainable location, which has good access to services within the village.

Page 19 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

The site can achieve safe access into and out of the site. A footpath could be provided along the front of the site which would enable safe pedestrian access.

Part of the immediate frontage of the site is also included within the designated Conservation Area of Steeple Bumpstead. However, it is not clear why this part of the site is included as it has no special architectural or historic interest in itself, and the boundary does not follow any identifiable physical feature or boundary on the ground. The existing trees and hedgerow along part of the site frontage could be retained in any residential development of the site, with access into the site being provided opposite the junction with Church Street.

The site is considered to be in a sustainable location, which has good access to local services within the village.

STIS396 N/A N/A Land east of N/A Stisted Coggeshall Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Colin Philip N/A N/A 5.7 Part paddocks Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B18) From FP25/PROW None Yes Low probability None Archaeological Bte693 small Access to Boot Direct access to A120 None N/A No N/A 142 N Y Y Spatial strategy Liaison with Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Countryside REMOVED not Baytree Farm Davis part fallow high sensitivity Coggeshall 111_25 adj NW (Zone 1) significance not unknown infill Sale area amendment Highways included in location adjacent or near to change) Road boundary known SMR would be Authority re. current strategy. to development 6523 required trunk road Not considered boundary access to be sustainable location, unlikely to be included in new Local Plan.

STIS397 N/A N/A Land at CM77 N/A Stisted Coggeshall Countryside No Call for Sites Mr James Mr James N/A 6.9 Agricultural land Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 10f From A120 None Adj LoWS Flat Low probability None None None None This site is available for development as part of a large None N/A No N/A 172 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Liaison with Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A 8AB (between Hindley Squier, and residential Temple Border (Zone 1) scheme with adjacent land, all for residential development, amendment and Highways included in DC Cottages Partner, Wood linked to an improvement to the A120 road. development Authority re. current strategy and The Leys), Bidwells boundary would trunk road could be adj A120 be required access considered under new Local Plan STIS398 N/A N/A Site off Rectory N/A Stisted Coggeshall Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Rose and Mr Nicholas 0.63 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A Land off No None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None Residential development on the site provides an allocation for None N/A No N/A 20 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Road (opp. Village Dorringron- Harper, Land and residential Rectory Road, (Zone 1) housing in Stisted for about 20 dwellings on a gross site area amendment and included in no.63) Ward Managing Stisted of about 0.63 ha. There is very good connectivity with development current strategy Director, existing nearby local facilities including the school and the boundary would could be Hawkspur Ltd allotments with pedestrian/cycle access possible from the site be required considered along Rectory Road. There is good visibility in both directions under new Local for vehicular access which can be improved on site with Plan visibility splays if required. Pedestrian access can be enhanced by designing a footpath along the frontage, which will also benefit pedestrian and road safety for existing houses opposite the site. This footpath could be then continued along the frontage of the allotments, where the verge is sufficiently wide to accommodate this.

STIS399 Land off Back Stisted Coggeshall Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Rose and Mr Nicholas 0.75 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside N/A N/A Back Lane No None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None Residential development on the site provides an allocation for None N/A No N/A 20 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Lane (r/o Village Dorringron- Harper, Land and residential (Zone 1) housing in Stisted for about 20 dwellings on a gross site area amendment and included in Brickwall Farm) Ward Managing of about 0.75 ha shown edged red on the accompanying site development current strategy Director, plan. boundary would could be Hawkspur Ltd be required considered There is very good connectivity with existing nearby local under new Local facilities including the school, with pedestrian/cycle access Plan possible from the site along Back Lane. A paved footpath terminates only a few metres from the site. Back Lane is straight in this location and is in a 30 mph speed zone. There is good visibility in both directions for vehicular access. Opposite the site is a row of former council houses (1-12 Sarcel).

STIS400 Land adj Stisted Stisted Coggeshall Adjacent other No Call for Sites Braintree Golf Mr Trevor 0.35 Scrub land Greenfield Countryside, N/A N/A Rectory Road Adj to southern None flat Low probability Existing None None None None The Golf Club has identified a small site on the edge of the None N/A N/A N/A 10 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Lodge, Rectory village Club Dodkins residential, golf boundary village which is bounded by residential development on 2 amendment and included in Road course. sides, and by the golf course on the third, which is well development current strategy contained and could be developed residentially without boundary would could be adverse impact on the countryside, but which would permit a be required considered housing contribution to Stisted and assist in retaining the under new Local viability of the Golf Club. Plan STIS401 37 The Street & Stisted Coggeshall Adjacent other No Call for Sites Mr and Mrs Mr Trevor 0.85 Vacant/part Greenfield residential/recr N/A N/A Existing Adj boundary None Flat Low probability Existing Conservation None None None NPPG paragraph 54 makes clear that in rural areas, local None N/A N/A N/A 6 N Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Land to rear village White Dodkins residential eation (Zone 1) Area planning authorities should be responsive to local amendment and included in garden land circumstances and plan housing development to reflect local development current strategy needs. boundary would could be be required considered under new Local Plan N/A N/A 21 N/A The Spinning Sturmer Bumpstead Other Village Yes Planning Mr J Collar John Baugh N/A 0.41 Vacant formerly Previously Countryside Urban area Urban From A1017 None TPO 8/89 - T1, Relatively Flat Low probability None None None None N/A Has planning 10/01248/FUL No N/A 9 Y Y Y Discharge of Site has 0 0 2 3 4 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Wheel Rowley Permission Ltd site of Developed Land and residential Woodland TPO (Zone 1) permission permitted with planning planning Cfs Hill restaurant and 8/89 - W1 S106 conditions permission for B&B housing STUR405 N/A N/A Woodlands N/A Sturmer Bumpstead Adjacent Main No Call for Sites St Edmundsbury Mr Will N/A 1.3 Hotel & Previously Countryside, (Relatively high (A2) From Coupals None None Slopes up Low probability Natural None None None Subject to Current under-supply of housing land None N/A No N/A 32 Y Y Y Development Current use Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hotel & Town Borough Council Brown, restaurant and Developed Land residential and sensitivity to Road northwards from (Zone 1) drainage. existing lease Current use unviable (hotel/restaurant) boundary needs to included in Restaurant, Estates associated golf course change) road Nearest surface Beneficial re-use of site amendment relocate current strategy, Coupals Road Surveyor St grounds water sewer in would be PDL, could be Edmundsbury Justinian Close required considered Borough under new Local Council Plan

STUR406 STU1 N/A Land at Crunch N/A Sturmer Bumpstead Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr David Wyatt Ms Gabrielle Construct 0.47 Redundant Greenfield Countryside, (Relatively high (A2) From Crunch None None Slopes north Low probability None None Historic landfill None In previous submissions to the Site Allocations consultations Market research conducted by None N/A No N/A 13 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Croft Village & Mr David Rowan, Reason Ltd allotment residential and sensitivity to Croft down to (Zone 1) site/250m zone carried out in 2013/14, we have outlined the potential for land our client has identified needs boundary included in Jones Construct Associate, dismantled change) dismantled historic landfill off Crunch Croft, Sturmer, to accommodate a development of in Sturmer for housing for older amendment current strategy Reason Pegasus railway railway thirteen bungalows (including five affordable) and amenity people, and for affordable would be could be Group open space. The recent and welcome acknowledgement by housing. The allocation of the required considered Braintree District Council that it needs to plan for a higher site will allow for a modestly- under new Local number of homes than set out in the Core Strategy means it scaled development of single- Plan should take a flexible approach to development sites and storey dwellings which will proposals, bearing in mind the need to support the ongoing satisfy this local demand, whilst economic and social prosperity of rural communities. widening the variety and availability of housing in the Paragraph 28 of the NPPF requires Local Plans to take a village in accord with paragraph positive approach to sustainable new development in rural 50 of the NPPF. We note the areas, in order to create jobs, boost rural prosperity, and recent call by planning minister promote the retention and development of local services. The Brandon Lewis for more allocation of the site off Crunch Croft will assist the Council in bungalows which form an meeting this aim. The additional residents will provide a larger important part of the housing catchment of users for Sturmer’s local facilities. In addition, it mix. In the previous Site is anticipated that community benefits, such as village hall Allocations consultation we also improvements and the provision of affordable homes, can be welcomed Braintree District secured by means of planning obligations and brought forward Council’s addition to policy in tandem with the proposed residential development. It may ADM8 - Housing Mix and also be possible to provide a small parking area for the use of Density which recognised the nearby residents on Rowley Hill. need to provide more bungalow accommodation to ensure a sustainable housing mix which meets the challenges of an ageing society.

Care will be taken to minimise the visual impacts of the development. Being single- storey, the proposed bungalows will achieve a smoother transition with the surrounding countryside and will be less prominent in their setting. Enhanced landscaping around the site boundaries will further assist in this. The scale and typology of development will be STUR407 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Sturmer Bumpstead Main Town No Call for Sites Mr Nic Ramsey, Mr Paul N/A 1.9 Vacant Greenfield Employment Urban area Urban From Phoenix FP24/PROW11 None Land falls to Low probability None Archaeological Hazardous None The site has been allocated for employment development (B2 Such evidence clearly Allocated for N/A No N/A 47 N N Y Local Plan Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Phoenix Road, Jaynic Sutton, Head undeveloped park, hotel Road 2_24 dissects north (Zone 1) significance not substance zone and B8 Uses) for nearly twenty years and has been promoted demonstrates that there is no employment employment use included in Haverhill Investments of Planning, land the site known ref. H3373 for general industrial, storage and distribution purposes as reasonable prospect in this allocation current strategy Business Park Cheffins SMR1629 SW part of the wider Haverhill Business Park, which extends to case of the land being brought amendment for housing corner around 26.3ha (65 acres) of gross land in total (i.e. before forward for employment use. In would be could be infrastructure, roads and landscaping), to the north of the the circumstances, and taking required considered Haverhill bypass (A1017), and to the east and west of into the NPPF, the continued under new Local Bumpstead Road. allocation of this site for Plan The Haverhill Business Park has therefore been responsible employment purposes makes for generating significant employment opportunities and little sense. Residential investment in Haverhill. However, it has now been over 7 development of the site should years since the last land deal and over 11ha (27 acres) still be considered, given its remain for development. sustainable location within the The NPPF seeks to avoid the longer term protection of sites development boundary of for employment without reasonable prospects. The site has Haverhill, close to existing now been marketed for employment use for over ten years, employment sites without success, and the Council is considering to continue the allocation of this land for employment purposes for another 18 years. Recent appeal decisions elsewhere in England see have shown that Inspectors consider that marketing of employment sites for (in some cases) as little as 2 years, demonstrates that there is no reasonable prospect of a site being used for that purpose. There has no been firm interest in the development of this site for any employment use despite a long and comprehensive marketing exercise, and despite there having been an extant planning permission for B1, B2 and B8 uses since 2002.

STUR523 N/A N/A Land rear of the N/A Sturmer Bumpstead Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs Justin N/A N/A 1.09 Paddock and Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A2/B3) From Pear Tree FP12/PROW11 None Land rises to Low probability None None None Covenant until Feb 2020 however negotiations may be None N/A No N/A 27 Y Y Y Development Liaise with Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Spinning Wheel, Village and Samantha outbuildings and residential sensitivity to Land / (through 2_12 adj south (Zone 1) possible to bring forward sooner boundary Highways re included in The Street Stocks change / spinning wheel western amendment satisfactory current strategy Moderate to site when boundary would be access could be high sensitivity redeveloped?) required considered to change) under new Local Plan N/A COG2 N/A N/A Land at Porters Surrex Coggeshall Countryside No Site Allocations Mrs T Lee Clive N/A 0.35 Large vacant Previously Countryside (Low to (B19) Adjacent to No public None Flat Low probability None None None Unknown N/A None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Liaison with Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Head Public and Richardson & pub building and Developed Land and residential moderate A120, access footpaths (Zone 1) Highways boundary included in Cfs House, Development Associates associated car sensitivity to off existing lane. through site. Authority re. amendment current strategy, Colchester Management parking and change) trunk road would be PDL, could be Road Plan gardens access required considered under new Local Plan

TOPP408 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Toppesfield Yeldham Countryside No Call for Sites Mr Martin Nally N/A N/A 1.4 Ex farmland Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B9) From Gainsford FP12/PROW11 NE corner Slopes gently Low probability None None None None None The site is well placed, being located directly adjacent to None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hierarchy status The Thatchings, (Gainsford End) high sensitivity End Road 5_12 part protected down to west (Zone 1) existing village housing. It is proposed that the site could amendment included in countryside; Gainsford End to change) southern hedgerow 1/97 provide housing in a density, unit size and character in would be current strategy located adj boundary & keeping with that of the existing village, in particular the more required could be group of western recent devlopments in the village in Mallows Lane. The site considered dwellings which boundary benefits from significant road frontage to Gainsford End Road. under new Local does not have a This small development would help to support local Plan development infrastructure and faciltiies in Toppersfield/Gainsford End. The boundary development of this site could also include amenitites to benefit the local community.

Page 20 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

TOPP410 TOP1X N/A Land to west of N/A Toppesfield Yeldham Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mrs Jane Clark Mr Paul N/A 0.4 Agricultural Greenfield Berwick Hall (Moderate to (B9) From The None Group TPO Relatively Flat Low probability Grade II Listed None None None Concerns raised in respect of scale of development proposal None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Seek advice Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A The Causeway Village Benton, Grounds and high sensitivity Causeway 15/82 - G1 E. (Zone 1) Toppesfield previously submitted under ADMP, a small area is now boundary from heritage included in (opp. no.11-35) Assoc residential to change) boundary, TPO House to S. & proposed. Consider that land within and around Toppesfield amendment specialists current strategy Director, groups adj N. Berwick Hall to can provide an appropriate and sustainable location for would be could be Januarys boundary NW growth. Toppesfield is one of the more sustainable "Other required considered Villages" within the district with established local facilities under new Local including a primary school, shop and public house. A local Plan bus service also serves the village.

TOPP411 N/A N/A Land north of N/A Toppesfield Yeldham Countryside No Call for Sites Berwick Hall Mr Paul N/A 0.9 Agricultural field Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B9) From Park Lane FP2/PROW None Relatively Flat Low probability Berwick Hall None None The farming As we have set out in our other representation that relates to None N/A No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Park Lane Farm Ltd Benton, and farm yard and farmyard high sensitivity 115_2 crosses (Zone 1) and curtilage enterprise of land to the west of the Causeway (site TOP1X), we consider boundary included in Assoc to change) site listed buildings Berwick Hall Farm that an appropriate quantum of dwellings can be delivered in amendment current strategy Partner, to south of site Ltd is changing. A Toppesfield in a manner that will ensure sustainable growth would be could be Carter Jonas large proportion can be secured. required considered incorporating of the land that Toppesfield benefits from many local services and facilities under new Local Januarys now forms the that set it apart from most of the other villages located within Plan farm is located to the district. The provision of additional housing will not only the west. The help cater for the local need for more homes but will also help firms other farm support the existing facilities and services that ensures that yards located in Toppesfield is not an isolated and unsustainable village that is this area now entirely reliant on facilities and services located in nearby form the main towns and villages that can only be reached by car. centre for the The relocation of the farm yard away from the village will farm. The farm enable the impacts of the yard on the amenity of the village to yard off Park be addressed. Lane is now divorced from much of the farm’s land and its facilities would, from an operational and highways point of view, be better relocated. This provides an opportunity to redevelop the farm yard at Park Lane.

TOPP413/TO N/A N/A Church Farm N/A Toppesfield Yeldham Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs Mark N/A 0.18 Grain store Greenfield Countryside (Moderate to (B9) From Church None None Relatively Flat Low probability To sustainable Adj None None None Given the publication of the National Planning Policy This is the extent of the None N/A No N/A 5 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A PP412 barn (inc Store), Village Steven & Jackson, used for and residential high sensitivity Lane (Zone 1) drainage conservation Framework which now supports the re-use of redundant or established garden. I attach boundary included in Church Lane Samantha Mark Jackson domestic and church to change) system area disused buildings when it would lead to an enhancement to the aerial photographs from 2006 amendment current strategy Baker & Cotterill Planning storage/Garden opposite. immediate surroundings, even in isolated rural locations, and a recent photograph to would be could be Land (Para 55 of the NPPF), it is it is submitted that the demonstrate this. It would required considered development of the barn and its immediate curtilage for therefore be logical to adjust under new Local residential use is fully in accordance with the NPPF and will the envelope slightly northwards Plan make a valuable contribution to the supply of rural housing to reflect this. immediately adjoining the village. As part of this submission the proposal is also to extend the village envelope around the building, its immediate curtilage and the garden curtilage of Church Farm Barn. CRESS212 CRE6 N/A Land east of Land to the east Tye Green Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Gateway 120 Mr Andy N/A c 854ha Agricultural Greenfield Countryside, Medium - Low 10b - 10f A120 Yes Yes Flood Zone 1, SUDS Listed buildings Unknown Not known No known legal Gateway 120 considers that the general approach to housing None None No N/A 3,000 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Larger extent Braintree of the A120, Cressing Cressing Village Ltd Stevens, (including edge of small areas on site issues growth represents the most appropriate in present amendment and included in submitted under (Temple Border) Braintree Managing areas nr Village, edge toward river circumstances, and that when the infrastructure and economic development current strategy Cfs, includes Director Marks of town Flood Zone 2/3. growth relationship is further considered it will add additional boundary would could be other uses Tey) weight to the general levels new dwelling provision the council be required considered as already accepted, representing a positive opportunity to under new Local further enhance the broad based potential of the region. Plan

CRESS207 Land East Tye Green Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Kieran Mr Peter 1.1 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/pa Medium 3c Braintree Road None None Flat Low probability existing None None Adjacent a gas None The proposals offer a complementary solution to Braintree None None No N/A 30 Y Y Y Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Braintree Road, Cressing Cressing Village Rushe Williams ddocks/farm (Zone 1) pipeline town centre aspirations and could deliver a significant amendment and included in Tye Green buildings quantum of housing, employment floorspace, public realm development current strategy residential on improvements, connectivity and promoting sustainability by boundary would could be the opposite better utilising an be required considered site of the under new Local road. Plan CRESS209 Land south of Tye Green Silver End and Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Kieran Mr Peter 14.5 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 3a Braintree Road Two PROWs None Flat Low probability Existing None None None Powerline runs The proposals offer a complementary solution to Braintree None None No N/A 362 Y Y Y Spatial strategy CRESS208 Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A CRESS208 Fowlers Farm Cressing Cressing Village Rushe Williams adjacent (Zone 1) over southern town centre aspirations and could deliver a significant amendment and landlocked by included in Roundabout part of site. quantum of housing, employment floorspace, public realm development other ownership current strategy improvements, connectivity and promoting sustainability by boundary would could be better utilising an be required considered under new Local Plan WETH414 Wethersfield Three Fields Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr James Mr David 0.45 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/ed N/a N/A Silver Street None None South sloping Low probability Existing None None None None Wethersfield cannot be allowed to stagnate and provision of The site is adjoining an existing None None No N/A 20 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Village Thomson Smith Land ge of village (Zone 1) natural growth must be provided. development boundary and any boundary included in residential alterations to include these amendment current strategy sites should be regarded as a would be could be rounding off. required considered under new Local Plan WHIC418 Land at 102 White Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key 4 Y Y Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Colchester Service Village threshold below threshold Road, WHIC419 South of White Colne The Colnes Adjacent Key No Call for Sites R W R Mr Edward 0.63 Agricultural Greenfield Edge of village N/A N/A Off Colchester None None flat Low probability Existing None None None None This site was included in the Draft Development Boundary for None None No N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Colchester Service Village Browning Gittins residential Road (Zone 1) White Colne in the January 2013 Consultation Document but boundary included in Road reconsidered at the Local Development Framework Sub- amendment current strategy Committee on the 13th June 2013 when it was deleted. The would be could be minutes of this meeting give no reason for this decision. The required considered Council considered the site as one with a capacity of 10+ under new Local dwellings but a lower capacity could be envisaged. The site is Plan available and capable of making a small addition to the housing stock in White Colne, which although in the “Other Villages” classification, lies close to the LSV of Earls Colne (to which it is physically adjoined), and on an inter-urban bus route between Colchester and Halstead. It also lies within the existing 30mph speed limit area. The fact that this site was supported by the Council previously indicates that it is worthy of reconsideration – especially as the Council has recorded no reasons for its deletion and no other alternative sites in White Colne were brought forward.

WISP420 WIC1A/B N/A Land to the N/A Wickham St Paul Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites C.S.Gosling Hayley N/A 0.36 Agricultural land Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (B6) From Church None None Flat Low probability Grade II listed Archaeological None None The site is adjacent to existing residential development (7 The site is close to bus stops None N/A No N/A 5 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A west of Church South Village Esq. Morley, uncultivated and residential sensitivity to Road (Zone 1) Shellards to significance not Church Road) on the western side of Church Road, and for regular bus services boundary included in Road Associate change) south west known opposite the existing linear residential development on the between the village, for social, amendment current strategy Planner, Strutt SMR9409 eastern side, which extends out of the village up to the recreational facilities and would be could be & Parker junction with Rectory Road. shopping in Halstead and required considered The Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) for Wickham Sudbury. School bus services under new Local Farmland Plateau identifies that the sensitive key operate from the village to St Plan characteristics and landscape elements within this area Andrews Primary School in include mature hedgerow trees at field boundaries and a Bulmer village and Hedingham patchwork of small fields. The area also has a dispersed School in Castle Hedingham. settlement pattern that would be affected by potential large- The site is within easy reach of scale new development. Suggested landscape planning the network of public footpaths guidelines within the LCA include ensuring that any new and bridleways in and around development is small-scale responding to historic settlement the village. It is also within pattern, landscape setting and locally distinctive building close proximity to the central styles. village green, which is the focus As shown on Drawing No SC03, the proposed residential of activity within the village. The development of the site would be small-scale. The landscape site has good accessibility to setting of the site will be preserved by ensuring the natural green space. maintenance of existing field boundaries and hedgerows, and The modest development of the hedgerows within the site, which is suggested as a land site would secure the provision management guideline within the LCA. These hedgerows of much needed affordable could be strengthened by additional planting. The proposed housing within the village, which development will not extend beyond the existing linear would be a benefit to the development on the eastern side of Church Road. community. Although the site is outside of the current Development Limits There are no known for Wickham St Paul, the site lies adjacent to an existing infrastructure constraints or cluster of development which extends out of the village. As amenity issues that would acknowledged by the Local Development Framework prevent development. Committee the settlement has a good range of services comprising a village hall, pub, post office and grocery store.

RIVE360 RIV2 17 Forest Road Land to the Witham Silver End and Main Town Yes/No Core Strategy Bellway Homes Mr Olivier Bellway Homes 16.24 Agricultural Greenfield Residential, Medium - Low 3e/3f Access from FP60/PROW Adj LoWS Gentle slope Low probability None None Bte868 - small Gas pipeline The site is allocated in Policy CS1 of the adopted Braintree Pending 15/00799/OUT No 370 Y Y Y Core Strategy 40 0 0 30 100 100 100 330 40 0 0 0 No N/A north-east of Cressing and The Raven Spencer, Ltd and The Land and golf agricultural, Forest Road 105_60 (John Bra175 The Old from north to (Zone 1) unknown infill crosses the site Core Strategy as a mixed-use growth location for a minimum consideration & Growth Witham (off Group Andrew Martin Raven Group course golf course, Ray Walk) Rectory south of 300 new homes and other uses. CS1 phasing is restricts 15/00800/FUL Location, Forest Road) Planning Ltd mainline crosses the site Meadows the site to 2021-2026. Phasing restrictions were proposed (Hybrid planning railway, for removal in the ADMP in April 2014, material consideration application up to permission industrial as per Interim Planning Statement September 2014. There is 222 dwellings pending a strong policy basis to pursue a planning application on the Full, up to 148 consideration site within the next 12 months (if not sooner), with a view to dwellings delivering a significant number of new homes on-site in the outline) - next five years. received 17.6.15

RIVE366A Part of N/A North East N/A Adj Witham (In Silver End and Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Simon Brice Mr John Bellway Homes, 20.3 Agricultural/golf Greenfield Countryside Medium - Low 3e/3f Forest Road Through part of None gentle Low probability Existing None None None Gas pipleline There are no known infrastructure cosntaints or amenity None None No 325 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A various Witham Phase Rivenhall Parish) Cressing Town McLarty, The Raven course and residential site on eastern undulating (Zone 1) adjacent site issues that would prevent this site coming forward and it is included in other site 3a Strutt and Group and the side considered that this sustainable site should be allocated for current strategy areas Parker Brice Family development as a logical extension to the already allocated could be phase 1 development. considered under new Local Plan RIVE366B N/A N/A North East N/A Adj Witham (In Silver End and Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Simon Brice Mr John Bellway Homes, 2.3 Agricultural Greenfield Residential, Medium - Low 3c Rickstones None None Flat Low probability Existing None None None None There are no known infrastructure cosntaints or amenity None None No 25 Y Y Y Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Witham Phase Rivenhall Parish) Cressing Town McLarty, The Raven Builders Road (Zone 1) issues that would prevent this site coming forward and it is included in 3b Strutt and Group and the Merchant, considered that this sustainable site should be allocated for current strategy Parker Brice Family Playing field development as a logical extension to the already allocated could be phase 1 development. considered under new Local Plan N/A WCH15 N/A N/A White Horse Witham Witham Central Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Braintree N/A N/A Allocated as a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Site is Council Not submitted in Land Car Park District Council car park in the owned car Cfs REMOVED 2014 Pre- park with no Submission Site prospects of Allocations and development Development Management Plan.

N/A WCH18 N/A N/A Land off Witham Witham Central Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Multiple Grade II* listed 8173 8174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Heritage Not submitted in Mayland Road Ownership building, within a 8166 assets on site, Cfs REMOVED conservation limited area, potential, parking required for business on High Street N/A WCH19 N/A N/A Telephone Witham Witham Central Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 BT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Telephone Not submitted in Exchange Exchange in Cfs REMOVED building current use. Collingwood Limited scope Road for development on curtilage.

Page 21 of 22 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version

N/A WCH8SHLA 246 N/A Land adj Coach Witham Witham Central Main Town Yes Planning Mr Carl O'Boyle, N/A N/A 0.02 Vacant site Previously Main Town N/A Urban Yes None None Generally Flat Flood Zone 1 Existing drains Conservation Archaeological None None None Site has 08/01012/FUL Yes Yes 14 Y Y Y Site has 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in A House Way Permission Tayross Homes Developed Land Centre uses, on site area and site 8107 8108 planning planning Cfs Limited and residential adjacent listed 8109 8111 permission permission for buildings housing N/A WCH11 N/A N/A East of Mayland Witham Witham Central Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Braintree 0.5 0 Y N Y Removed long 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Long lease for Not submitted in House District Council office lease office use Cfs REMOVED long lease for office use

N/A WCH13 N/A N/A Newlands Drive Witham Witham Central Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Braintree N/A N/A 0.67 Car park Previously Main Town N/A Urban Newlands Street Small section on None Flat Low Probability Existing Adjacent Grade None None Unknown N/A Allocated as a N/A No N/A 14 Y Y Y Identified as 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Car Park District Council Developed Land Centre uses Northern (Zone 1) II listed comprehensive comprehensive Cfs boundary buildings, development development conservation area in the area. Could area 2014 Plan included limited residential as part of wider scheme N/A WCH14 304 N/A Newlands Witham Witham Central Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 New River None N/A 0.638 Shopping Previously Main Town N/A Urban Newlands Street None None Flat Low Probability Existing Grade II listed SMR_8173/817 Unknown Unknown N/A Allocated as a N/A No N/A 15 Y Y Y Identified as 15 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Precinct Retail (UK) Ltd Centre Developed Land Centre uses (Zone 1) buildings to 4/8166 comprehensive comprehensive Cfs Newland Street boundary and development development conservation area in the area. Could area 2014 Plan included limited residential as part of wider scheme. N/A WCH10SHL N/A N/A Garages and Witham Witham Central Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 0.23 0 Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below Not submitted in AA Backland, threshold threshold Cfs REMOVED Maldon Road below threshold

WITC421 WCH2 N/A Land south of Gimsons Witham Witham Central Main Town No Call for Sites Not Known Miss Judith Mr John 3.23 Residential Greenfield Residential. N/A Urban Vehicular Footpath/cyclew TPOs, LWS Relatively Flat Flood Zone 1 To be dealt with Adj Witham Archaeology Contaminated None The site was promoted in SHLAA 2010 ref WCH2 - Whilst not Visually N/A No N/A 70 Y Y Y Removal of Site is currently 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Newlands Ashton, Longhorn, Land curtilage and Amenity access through ay runs along BRA174 through SUDS conservation site 8179 Land has been allocated in the Site Allocations and Development Important Space Visually allocated for Street/off Kings Director, and Planning associated greenspace River Walk, north eastern Riverside strategy. area on the identified near Management Plan, the accompanying sustainability appraisal Important Space Visually Chase Judith Ashton Manager, amenity/scrub from River edge of the site. Meadows northern and the pond -this and strategic environmental assessment appraisal of the site designation Important Space (Previously Associates land View. adjoins the site. eastern edge of is however allocations Annex D2 Witham Feb 2014 highlighted the sites would be known as Pedestrian and This could be the site. The capable of being proximity to services and facilities. required Gimsons) cycle access is enhance as part site was dealt with in the proposed of the proposed identified as site remediation through Kings development. visually works. Chase to important space Newland Street. in the Braintree District Local Plan Review 2005.

WITC423 WIS6 288 Land at Lodge Lodge Farm Witham Witham Central Adjacent Main Yes Core Strategy Not Known Mr David Redrow Homes 35.6 Agricultural; Greenfield Residential, Medium 1g Access from None Registered Tree Slight fall across Low probability None None None Gas pipeline The site has a formal allocation within the adopted Core Approved at 15/00430/OUT No None 750 Y Y Y Core Strategy 50 0 0 130 190 180 200 700 50 0 0 0 No N/A Farm, Witham (Land to the Town Fletcher, Ltd agricultural, Hatfield Road 262, various the site to south- (Zone 1) crosses the site Strategy and the principle of the development has already committee approved Growth south-west of Associate mainline TPOs at points east corner been established. Detailed work has been undertaken with decision subject to S106 Location Witham - off Planner, Strutt railway on north- regard to a masterplan for the site and liaison with Braintree pending s106 15.9.15 Hatfield Road) & Parker LLP eastern District Council regarding the type and location of units on the boundary site. It is considered that the site has capacity to provide approximately 800 dwellings and that this should be reflected in the new Local Plan. 312 1 Crittall Witham Witham Central Main Town Yes Planning Mr Robert C 0.408 Offices Previously Employment/of N/A N/A Crittall Road None None Flat Low probability Existing None None None Gas pipeline in COUPA 13/13/COUPA 46 Y Y Y Site has 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Permission M-Kemball Developed Land fices (Zone 1) south west tip of COUPA for RIBA site. residential use. N/A WCH16 N/A N/A adj St Nicholas Witham Witham North Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Multiple Not submitted in Church ownership and Cfs REMOVED residential gardens N/A WCH17 N/A N/A Cullen Mill and Witham Witham North Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Previously N/A N/A Listed buildings 8107 8108 810 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Heritage Not submitted in former Witham Developed Land 8111 assets on site Cfs REMOVED Technology prevent Centre, 49 development Braintree Road N/A WCH3 N/A N/A Bellfields, Witham Witham North Main Town No SHLAA 2010 Essex County N/A N/A 1.01 Education and Previously Residential N/A Urban Via Church None None Generally Flat Flood Zone 1 Existing drains Adjacent Archaeological Contamination None None Education and CC/BTE/33/14 - Started N/A 30 Y N N Removal of Site is being 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes In use for Not submitted in Braintree Road Council visually Developed Land Street on site Witham site 8107 8108 near the Visually Erection of new existing used for education, site Cfs REMOVED important space and Greenfield Conservation 8109 8111 eastern Important Space school building designations education has not been education use Area boundary and extension required purposes submitted to existing again building. N/A WIN3 295 N/A Land south of Witham Witham North Main Town No SHLAA 2010 Mr Andrew N/A N/A 0.2183 Amenity Greenfield Residential N/A Urban Difficult access None Amenity Flat Flood Zone 1 No known None None None Not known None None Informal N/A No N/A 8 Y N Y ADMP Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Amenity Not submitted in Mulberry Epson Head of Greenspace greenspace issues recreation allocation included in greenspace, Cfs REMOVED Gardens Asset amendment current strategy not been re- informal Management would be could be submitted recreation required considered allocation under new Local Plan N/A WIN7 286 N/A Forest Road Witham Witham North Main Town Yes/No Site Allocations Mr Andrew Mr Marcus Peter Cook 0.69 Former Previously Residential N/A Urban Forest Road None Amenity Flat Flood Zone 1 No known None None None None N/A Planning 14/01644/FUL No Awaiting 31 Y Y Y Site has 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Community Hall, and Epson Head of Hawley community hall Developed Land greenspace issues Permission decision notice planning Cfs land South of Development Asset and Greenfield permission for Lime Close Management Management housing Plan WITN424 8 Collingwood Witham Witham North Main Town No Call for Sites Mr Ian Burns N/A N/A 0.79 Office building Previously Residential N/A N/A Collingwood None None Flat Flood Zone 1 Within None Unknown Unknown The NHS has reduced requirement for office space and None N/A No N/A 40 Y Y Y Current use Spatial strategy Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Road, Witham with car park Developed Land and town Road conservation demand for commercial office space in the town continues to needs to amendment included in centre uses area be low. Remaining NHS office uses could easily be relocated relocate would be current strategy elsewhere. We therefore feel that it is right at this time to put required could be the site forward for potential residential or mixed use considered redevelopment at some stage in the proposed plan period but under new Local can give no clear steer on potential timing until we have fully Plan reviewed the site. WITN425 WCH7SHLA N/A Land East of Rear of Witham Witham North Main Town Yes Call for Sites Mr & Mrs Bailey Mr N/A 0.4 Residential and Previously Residential N/A Urban Yes None None Generally Flat Flood Zone 1 Existing drains Part within Archaeological None None two willing The site meets all relevant sustainability criteria. Land Site within N/A No N/A 40 Y N Y Current use Site is within 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A A Chipping Hill Braintree Road (Owner and Christopher employment Developed Land and retail on site Witham site 8107 8108 parties assembly and delivery are straightforward with two development needs to development agent)/Mr M Bailey Conservation 8109 8111 landowners, The site has the capacity to deliver a quality boundary and is relocate boundary and Addison Area residential scheme, adj to Witham train station c45 minutes not allocated for has no other (Owner) from Central London. any uses allocations WITN426 WIN1 N/A Land to North Land adj Conrad Witham Witham North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Jeremy Mr Jack N/A 5.4 Agricultural Greenfield Residential/co Medium - High 3a Vehicular & None None Relatively Flat Flood Zone 1 An initial None None None None Land at Conrad Road represents an achievable, deliverable None N/A No N/A 130 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A West of Conrad Road Town Fisher Lilliot, untryside/scho Farm access off Drainage and sustainable opportunity to meet housing need in Braintree boundary included in Road Graduate ol Cressing Road Appraisal by District. The Elm Trust are committed to delivering the site amendment current strategy Planner (B1018) Odyssey and want to work with the Council on the delivery of would be could be Markides development at the site. required considered confirms that a under new Local SuDS scheme Plan could be input on site to offset the impacts of development. WITN427 WIN2 N/A Land north of Allotments Witham Witham North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Andrew N/A N/A 0.2927 Redundant Greenfield School/Countr Medium - High 3a Via Conrad None None Relatively Flat Flood Zone 1 In Conrad Road None None None None None Community N/A 8 Y N Y ADMP Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Conrad Road Conrad Road Town Epson Head of allotment site yside/Resident Road Orchard ADM44 allocation boundary included in Asset ial amendment amendment current strategy Management would be would be could be required required considered under new Local Plan WITN428 Land to the Witham Witham North Adjacent Main No Call for Sites Mr Jeremy Mr Jack 67.2 Agricultural Greenfield Countryside/S Medium - High 3a Off Cressing None None Flat Flood Zone 1 TBC None None TBC None The site represents a straegic allocation. This scale of None N/A No None 1500 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A north west of Town Fisher Lilliott chool/Resident Road development would allow for the provision of community and boundary included in Conrad Road ial educational facilities to support the existing and future needs amendment current strategy of Witham. In addition, a strategic allocation would provide would be could be wider economic benefit and assist in vitalising the Witham required considered economy through the support of services and business in the under new Local Town Centre. Plan

WITN429 Laburnum Way, Witham Witham North Main Town Yes Call for Sites Mr Sheilesh Mr Ashley N/A 0.4 Neighboruhood Previously Residential/Re N/A N/A Dorothy Sayers No None Flat Flood Zone 1 None None None None No The site shuold be allocated within the emerging new Local SPD N/A No SPD adopted 27 Y Y Y Site has SPD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Witham Patel Collins Centre developed Land creation Drive Plan for redevelopment in accordance with the principles of for development the Rickstones Neighbourhood Centre Development Brieft SPD.

N/A WIS2 236 N/A Land between Witham Witham South Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 Mr Jamie N/A Bloor Homes 3.13 Vacant site Greenfield Residential/A1 N/A Urban Constance None None Flat Flood Zone 1 No known None None Part of site None None None Planning 12/01620/FUL Yes Under 14 Y Y Y Site has 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Constance Wragg 2 Close issues within former Permission construction. planning Cfs Close & A12 landfill and other Full planning permission for Witham by-pass waste disposal, permission housing nosie from A12 granted March 2013. Work started June 2013. Includes 28 affordable dwellings in permission; completed 2014/2015. 35 private dwellings completed 2014/2015; total built 2014/2015 = 63, according to Building Control completion inspection records. N/A WIS9 114 N/A West half of Witham Witham South Main Town Yes Planning Taylor Wimpey Strutt & Taylor Wimpey 7.9 Scrub land Greenfield Residential N/A Urban Hatfield None TPO Flat Flood Zone 1 No known None None None None N/A Planning 14/00100/REM Yes Planning 135 Y Y Y Site has Site has 0 50 50 35 0 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 No N/A Not submitted in Maltings Lane Permission UK Ltd Parker UK Ltd Road/Maltings issues Permission permission and planning planning Cfs Lane under permission permission for construction housing WITC422 WIS10X 308 Ivy Chimneys, Ivy Chimneys, Witham Witham South Main Town Yes Site Allocations North Essex Mr Richard N/A 1 Medical use, Previously Residential N/A N/A From Hatfield FP92/PROW TPO 28/83-T1 Flat Low probability Existing Grade II Listed SMR185. High None Not known The existing listed building (known as Old Ivy Chimneys) is Pre-submission 14/01528/OUT No N/A 18 Y Y Y Discharge of Site has 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Hatfield Road Hatfield Road and Partnership Bigging, B1/D1 use in Developed Land Road 121_92 adj W (Zone 1) Old Ivy archaeological currently in medical use - but now vacant as it is considered allocation pending planning planning Development NHS Foundation Director, New Ivy boundary Chimneys potential, no longer fit for purpose. This building could be returned to decision conditions permission for Management Trust Gibberd Chimneys to be Roman period beneficial use as four flat units with minimal disruption to the housing Plan retained, historic and architectural interest of the building. disused bowling There is undeveloped land to the south west and previously green developed land at the rear of the property. It is estimated that the vacant site would support up to 20 units. The surrounding area is predominately residential or compatible uses.

N/A WIW2SHLA N/A N/A Land between Witham Witham West Main Town No SHLAA 2010 0.4 0 Site is currently 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Site is amenity Not submitted in A Spar Road and allocated for Greenspace Cfs REMOVED Highfield Road Informal informal Recreation recreation allocation

N/A WIW12SHL N/A N/A Chelmer Road Witham Witham West Main Town Yes SHLAA 2010 0.4 0 Areas of back 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Areas of back Not submitted in AA gardens in gardens in Cfs REMOVED multiple multiple multiple ownerships ownerships ownerships

WITW431 WIW1 289 Land off Blunts Land at Blunts Witham Witham West Adjacent Main Yes/No Site Allocations Mr Andrew N/A N/A 1.71 Scrub Land Greenfield Residential/am Medium 1b Blunts Hall Road Adjacent None Flat Flood Zone 1 Existing None on site Unknown None Unknown None Pre-submission N/A No N/A 40 Y Y Y Site access will Site is within 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 No N/A Hall Road Hall Road Town and Epson Head of enity/countrysi allocation need to be development Development Asset de achieved boundary and Management Management has no other Plan allocations

Page 22 of 22