Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2016) Print version 2016 WIP PDL, "Formal" Legal Current Notes: yellow Greenfield, LCA Capacity - Natural Constraints Comments from Owners/Agent Overcoming Previous Hierarchy Conformity with Site Identified Site Size Site Current Adj Land Parcel Public Rights Flooding Surface Water Archaeological Comments from Residential Under Overcoming Overcoming shading LP Ref RLA Ref Site Name Other names Settlement Ward 2015 Site Owner Site Agent Developer Mixed parcel level if Site Access Features Gradient Historic Assets Contamination (ransom strips, (taken from Cfs form, lengthy supporting statements Application No. Progress Constraints Conclusions Removed Reason Ref No. Status Spatial Strategy Via (ha) Use(s) Use(s) Ref of Way (Flood Zone) Drainage Assets Owners/Agents continued Planning Construction Constraints 1 Constraints 2 indicates info Greenfield/Bro available (TPOs, LNR access rights may be summarised) free text Capacity Suitability 2021-2026 Status Availability has been year supply supply year wnfield etc.) etc.) Achievability updated Site DevelopableSite In Year Site Deliverable Not within 5 within Deliverable Not Site Current Year 2015-2016 Year Current 1 2016-2017 Year 2 2017-2018 Year 3 2018-2019 Year 4 2019-2020 Year 5 2020-2021 Year 2016-2021 1-5 Years Total 2026-2031 Years In 2031-2033 Years In 2033 Post ALPH525 N/A N/A Sycamore N/A Alphamstone Stour Valley Countryside Yes Call for Sites Mr Robin N/A N/A 0.5 Residential (1 Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A2) Existing None None 1/35 from West Low Probability To existing None None None None Additional much needed housing in the Village None None N/A 7 Y Y Y Site in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Backland REMOVED, Cottage, Goulds South Williams house) sensitivity to (Hedgerow to to East (Zone 1) sufficiently large development backland dev. Road change) front) nucleated in area with Hierarchy status hamlet for linear form countryside; RLP16 to apply located in but back land Alphamstone APLH101 N/A N/A Joss Cottage, N/A Alphamstone Stour Valley Countryside No Call for Sites Mr John N/A N/A 1.6 Residential (1 Greenfield Countryside (Relatively high (A2) Existing None None Slight Low Probability To existing None None None None Two acres available as part of current garden field. None None N/A 4 Y Y Y Site is below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED, Goulds Road South Cannings house) sensitivity to (Zone 1) threshold for threshold below threshold change) SHLAA, and is in an isolated countryside ASHE102 ASH1 N/A Site fronting N/A Ashen Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr & Mrs Mr David N/A 0.4 Agricultural Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) From Foxes None None Slight slope Low Probability Soakaways None None None None It must be remembered that the function of the Planning Site is adjacent to the None None N/A N/A 10 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Foxes Road North Village Robert Smith Land and high sensitivity Road (Zone 1) system is to provide a degree of choice as to where people development boundary and boundary included in Chapman countryside to change) wish to live. The current policy has put pressure on house inclusion would be considered amendment current strategy prices and if allowed to continue, will further restrict and as a natural rounding off of the would be could be "Squeeze out" local people who wish to live locally. In boundary. required considered addition, this situation has been aggravated by the continuing under new Local growth and expansion relating to Stanstead Airport. Ashen is Plan such a village where further controlled residential development should be allowed and we refer to previous representations requesting that the village envelope should be altered to include an allocation for residential development on this site. ASHE103 ASH2 N/A South of Foxes N/A Ashen Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Stephen Mrs Clare N/A 0.98 Agricultural Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) From Upper None TPO 3/97 - T1 Relatively Flat Low Probability SUDS None None None None The site has an absence of any physical constraints, and None None N/A 18 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A Lane North Village Norris Hutchinson Land and high sensitivity Farm NW Boundary (Zone 1) could be considered suitable for development recognising that boundary included in countryside to change) Road/Foxes both sides of the site abut the existing village boundary. amendment current strategy Lane/Clare Rd would be could be required considered under new Local ASHE104 ASH3/5 N/A Land to the N/A Ashen Stour Valley Adjacent Other Yes Site Allocations Mr Nigel Mr Paul N/A 0.45 Garden land, Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (A2/B4) Existing PROW 59_21 None Flat Low Probability Soakaways Adj None None None Site was included in the Site Allocations and Development Pre-submission 15/00888/FUL No Pending 2 Y Y Y Site below 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED, west of Street North Village and McCrea Munson concrete and high sensitivity southern (Zone 1) conservation Management Plan which the Council considers a material allocation Consideration threshold. threshold Below Farm Development foundation of countryside to boundary area and Grade consideration for the determination of planning applications. without Threshold Management commercial change/Relative II/II* listed permission Plan chicken shed. ly high buildings sensitivity to ASHE500 N/A N/A Land rear of N/A Ashen Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Timothy N/A N/A 0.54 Fallow Land Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) Existing None None Slopes down to Low Probability Soakaways None None None None The area of land in question is currently agricultural. If None N/A No N/A 30 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A New North Village Edwards and high sensitivity north (Zone 1) included in this scheme and with positive feedback from boundary included in Bungalows, The countryside to change) Braintree DC agreeing to change of use to land for amendment current strategy Street appropriate development I and my neighbours would not would be could be hesitate in allowing it to become available for immediate use required considered under new Local Plan BELO105 BLO1 N/A Land north of N/A Belchamp Otten Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Frederick N/A N/A 0.8 Arable Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) From The Street PROW 61_12 None Flat Low Probability To existing None None None None More affordable housing is needed to enable younger people None N/A No N/A 15 Y Y Y Development Site not 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No N/A The Street North Village Branwhite and high sensitivity NE boundary (Zone 1) and those on lower incomes to live in the village. This would boundary included in countryside to change) ensure the survival of the local village school and other amendment current strategy facilities currently available to residents in the area. A mixture would be could be of smaller house alongside the existing larger houses in the required considered village would be excellent for the social cohesion of the under new Local village. The site is in the centre of a friendly village community Plan and has road frontage. It has nearby access to primary schools, pubs and a community centre, as well as being on a bus route for local primary and secondary schools. There is also a bus service to Sudbury BELO106 BLO4 N/A Land adj N/A Belchamp Otten Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Frederick N/A N/A 0.25 Arable Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) From The Street None None Flat Low Probability Ditch and land Adjacent None None None This site is next to an existing bungalow which is one of only None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED Branfields, The North Village Branwhite and high sensitivity (Zone 1) drains conservation three in the village. A bungalow on this site would not be at all boundary threshold. threshold below threshold Street countryside to change) area intrusive to the existing surrounding buildings, and would amendment provide a more suitable balance of housing options would be required BELO107 BLO5 N/A Land to the east N/A Belchamp Otten Stour Valley Adjacent Other No Call for Sites Mr Frederick N/A N/A 0.3 Derelict Greenfield Edge of village (Moderate to (B4) The Street or None None Flat Low Probability Existing Conservation None None None This site is unsuitable for the agricultural use it had in the None N/A No N/A 1 Y Y Y Development Site below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yes Below REMOVED of junction of North Village Branwhite piggery/poultry and high sensitivity Puttock End (Zone 1) Area past. It would provide an ideal site for a residential dwelling boundary threshold. threshold below threshold The Street & shed and countryside to change) built sympathetically to blend in with other listed dwellings.