DOCSLIB.ORG

The Use of Waste As Fill Material in the Land

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Use of Waste As Fill Material in the Land Eindhoven University of Technology MASTER The use of waste as fill material in the land reclamation projects of Jakarta evaluating the possibilities of using waste as an interesting substitute of sand within the land reclamation projects of Jakarta Barry, N.F. Award date: 2013 Link to publication Disclaimer This document contains a student thesis (bachelor's or master's), as authored by a student at Eindhoven University of Technology. Student theses are made available in the TU/e repository upon obtaining the required degree. The grade received is not published on the document as presented in the repository. The required complexity or quality of research of student theses may vary by program, and the required minimum study period may vary in duration. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain 2013 Author: ing. Nene F. Barry Student number: 0754065 [THE USE OF WASTE AS FILL MATERIAL IN THE LAND RECLAMATION PROJECTS OF JAKARTA] Evaluating the possibilities of using waste as an interesting substitute of sand within the land reclamation projects of Jakarta Graduation program Construction Management and Engineering (Urban Development) 2012-2013 Graduation committee Prof. dr. ir. Wim Schaefer (TU/e) Dr. Qi Han (TU/e) Ir. Bart van Weenen (TU/e) Ir. Arno Kops (Witteveen & Bos) Date of graduation 07-03-2013 N.F. Barry, 2013, The use of waste as fill material in the land reclamation projects of Jakarta. Foreword This research is the final step of my master degree in the field of Construction Management and Engineering (Urban Development) at the Eindhoven University of Technology, where I started two and half years ago. The research was conducted within the company Witteveen + Bos, where I had Arno Kops as mentor, who gave me the needed flexibility, resources and autonomy, for which I am very grateful and I would like to thank Arno for his trust and support. I would like to thank Sawarendro for his support and for giving me the necessary insight in the Indonesian social and governmental context. I would also like to thank Henk Nieboer for making it all possible. On the TU/e front, I would like to thank my graduation committee: prof Wim Schaefer for the inspiring discussions, Bart van Weenen for his substantive guidance and Han Qi for her support within the research methods and structure. I would also like to thank them all for believing in me and granting me the necessary KENWIB support for the research. I would also like to thank my partner Milko Lippe, my family and friends for their mental support and encouragement. The choice of my research topic was mainly formed during my exchange program in Singapore, where I had a project within the module “Climate Change and the Built Environment” involving flood protection, urban heat island and air pollution. The project inspired me to focus on Asian countries, vulnerable to the effects of climate change. My regular consultations and brainstorm sessions with Arno Kops and eventually Sawarendro helped formulate the research topic, which turned out to be very interesting for all parties: Witteveen + Bos, TU/e en me. Those last months of research have been very interesting with lots of interesting discussions and learning moments. I am very grateful for this opportunity and thank all the experts (see experts list) who played a role within this accomplishment. I hope this research can contribute to the challenge towards sustainable waste management and responsible land reclamation in Jakarta. Everything comes to an end. I guess that is a good thing as there, lies the origin of progress, evolution and improvement. Therefore I am happy to turn this page of my journey book and embrace what comes next. Nene F. Barry The Hague, February 25th 2013. 2 N.F. Barry, 2013, The use of waste as fill material in the land reclamation projects of Jakarta. Content Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... 2 List of tables ...................................................................................................................................... 6 List of figures ..................................................................................................................................... 7 List of experts .................................................................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction and research design ......................................................................................... 11 1.1 Background, context and relevance .................................................................................. 11 1.2 Problem definition ............................................................................................................. 12 1.3 Research questions............................................................................................................ 12 1.4 Research objective and limitations ................................................................................... 12 1.4.1 Limitations or risks .................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Research method .............................................................................................................. 13 1.5.1 Data collection and analysis ...................................................................................... 13 2 Literature review ................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Land reclamation ............................................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 Traditional way of land reclamation; the use of sand as fill material ....................... 17 2.1.2 The use of waste within land reclamation ................................................................ 18 2.2 Land reclamation in Jakarta .............................................................................................. 19 2.2.1 Plans in Jakarta .......................................................................................................... 19 2.3 Solid waste management (SWM) system of Jakarta ......................................................... 20 2.3.1 SWM system .............................................................................................................. 20 2.3.2 MSW quantities and compositions ........................................................................... 21 2.3.3 Solid Waste Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 22 2.3.4 Social context ............................................................................................................ 24 2.3.5 Economic context ...................................................................................................... 26 2.3.6 Environmental context .............................................................................................. 28 2.3.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 29 3 Alternative methods of using waste as fill material within land reclamation ...................... 31 3.1 Alternative 1: existing expertise and technology; Case study of the cases of Pulau Semakau (Singapore) and Yumeshima Island (Japan) ....................................................... 31 3.1.1 Case study protocol ................................................................................................... 31 3.1.2 Singapore case analysis: Semakau landfill ................................................................. 32 3.1.3 Japan case analysis: Yumeshima Island, Osaka ......................................................... 38 3.1.4 Case comparison through MCA ................................................................................. 45 3.1.5 Conclusion and summary of the suitable elements for the case of Jakarta ............. 47 3 N.F. Barry, 2013, The use of waste as fill material in the land reclamation projects of Jakarta. 3.1.6 Alternative 1: Land reclamation method with the use of compost and incinerator ash as fill materials ............................................................................................................. 48 3.2 Alternative 2 and 3: possible new expertise and technology ........................................... 55 3.2.1 Alternative 2: land reclamation method with the use of Plasma Gasification slag as fill material ........................................................................................................................ 55 3.2.2 Alternative 3: land reclamation method with the use of the Strengthened Sediment Technology ................................................................................................................... 61 3.3 Comparison of the three alternatives and their alternative fill materials through MCA 68 3.3.1 Determining the criteria
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building an Offshore Nature Haven on Trash
    CASE STUDY Building an Offshore Nature Haven on Trash Landfills are associated with toxic environments, yet the offshore landfill in Singapore has thriving marine life that people come to explore during low tides. Photo credit: Ria Tan. Singapore built an offshore landfill on Pulau Semakau primarily for waste management, but it also ensured that marine life would thrive and it could serve as a public park. Published: 27 November 2017 Overview As a fast-growing island city-state, Singapore has little space on its mainland for the rubbish its residents generate. Its innovative solution was to build one of the world’s earliest and cleanest offshore landfills—an island that today harbours flourishing ecosystems from mangroves to coral reefs. This case study was adapted from Urban Solutions of the Centre for Liveable Cities in Singapore. Challenges In 1992, one of Singapore’s last two landfill sites, a dumping ground at Lim Chu Kang in the north western region of the mainland, reached its maximum capacity and was closed. The other landfill, a 234- hectare site at Lorong Halus in the northeast, was expected to fill up by 1999. Singapore, like any small country or city with a burgeoning economy, faced a trash problem. As it grew, it generated increasing amounts of waste. In 1970, about 1,300 tonnes of solid waste was disposed of each day; by 1992, this had ballooned to about 6,000 tonnes a day. This was despite the fact that Singapore had been incinerating its trash since the late 1970s to generate energy and minimise the land required for dumps.
    [Show full text]
  • One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan
    One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Project Listing* (Last Updated on 20/12/2013) *Project Details Provided May Subject to Subsequent Changes by Owner/Developer
    Construction Project Listing* (Last Updated on 20/12/2013) *Project details provided may subject to subsequent changes by owner/developer. Note: Words highlighted in blue refer to the latest updates for projects published before. Owner/Developer Estimated Site Area Gross Floor Development Description Of Project Date Of Date of Source Consultant Contractor Construction (sq m) Area Type Commencement Completion Cost ($million) (sq m) Redevelopment into a 6 Storey Shopping Mall Raffles Medical Group Ltd - 5,827 - Institutional with 2 levels of Basement Carpark at 100 Taman - - ST 17/12/13 - - Warna BT 11/12/13 Grow-Tech Properties Pte Industrial development at Gambas Crescent & URA tender Ltd (Part of Far East - 14,302 - Industrial -- -- (Parcel 3) result Organization) 13/12/13 Addition of a 5 Storey Building to United World Kim Seng Heng United World College BLT Architecture & 42.5 - - Institutional College South East Asia (UWCSEA) campus at Dec-2013 Aug-2015 BT 13/12/13 Engineering South East Asia (UWCSEA) Design Dover Road Construction Pte Ltd Erection of an LPG Terminal to import alternative Vopak Terminals Singapore BT/ST - - - Industrial Liquefied Petroleum Gas feedstock at Banyan - 1Q 2016 -- Pte Ltd 11/12/13 Terminal in Jurong Island BT/ST Residential development comprising 281 units 16/11/12 & World Class Developments with 24 hour concierge service and 18 commercial 11/12/13 & (North) Pte Ltd [Subsidiary - 10,170 - Residential -- -- units at Jalan Jurong Kechil URA tender of Aspial Corporation] (The Hillford) result 22/11/12 Page 1 Construction Project Listing* (Last Updated on 20/12/2013) *Project details provided may subject to subsequent changes by owner/developer.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Mangrove Forests in Singapore
    Proceedings of Nature Society, Singapore’s Conference on ‘Nature Conservation for a Sustainable Singapore’ – 16th October 2011. Pg. 99–120. THE CURRENT STATUS OF MANGROVE FORESTS IN SINGAPORE YANG Shufen1, Rachel L. F. LIM1, SHEUE Chiou-Rong2 & Jean W. H. YONG3,4* 1National Biodiversity Centre, National Parks Board, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore 259569. 2Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, 250, Kuo Kuang Rd., Taichung 402, Taiwan. 3Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. 4Singapore University of Technology and Design, 20 Dover Drive, Singapore 138682. (*E-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Even in a small and urbanised country like Singapore, we are still able to find new plant records in our remaining 735 ha of mangrove forests. With only one notable extinction (Brownlowia argentata Kurz), a total of 35 ‘true’ mangrove species can still be found in Singapore. This is half of the world’s total ‘true’ mangrove species recognised by IUCN. The botanical results indicate that Singapore still harbours rich mangrove diversity. The IUCN 'Critically Endangered' mangrove, Bruguiera hainesii C. G. Rogers, was discovered in 2003 as a new record. Thought to be extinct, B. sexangula (Lour.) Poir. trees were re-discovered in 2002 and occur mainly in the back mangrove. In 1999, an uncertain taxon of Ceriops was discovered, and identified as the so-called C. decandra (Griff.) Ding Hou. We later confirmed that the uncertain Ceriops species should be C. zippeliana Blume. Through international collaborative research efforts, the elucidation of the taxonomic identity of Kandelia obovata Sheue, Liu & Yong (the main mangrove of China, Japan, Taiwan and Vietnam) in 2003 was assisted by our local research efforts towards protecting our own Kandelia candel (L.) Druce.
    [Show full text]
  • a Survey of the Fringing Reef Community of Pulau Semakau Introduction
    Coastal Living Resources of Singapore : Proceedings of a Symposium on the Assessme nt of Living Reso urces in the Coastal Areas of Singapore. A SURVEY OF THE FRINGING REEF COMMUNITY OF PULAU SEMAKAU C.B. Leng, Jeffrey K.Y. Low & Maylene G.K. Loo Department of Zoology National University of Singapore Lower Kent Ridge Road Singapore 0511 , ABSTRACT This paper summarises the benthic lifeform data collected at two sites from depths of 3 and 10 metres on the reef slopes of Pulau Semakau in four surveys. Analysis of the data showed that the hard corals found at both sites were all of the non-Acropora type. A significant decrease in live coral cover occurred with increase in depth at both sites, from42.09% to2.48% at site 1, and from 59.72% to0.0% at site 2. Foliose and submassive corals predominated at the two sites studied, concentrated mainly on the upper reef slopes. Thirty-three genera of scleractinian corals were recorded from the study, with Pectinia being the most common genus encountered. Submassive corals like Plerogyra, Euphyllia (Site 1) and Goniopora (Site 2) were also found in great abundance . Another notable feature of the sites surveyed was the high percentage of abiotic cover, comprising mainly of sand and rubble, on the lower reef slopes, indicating less favourable conditions for growth at that depth. The percentage covers of algae and other fauna were low at these sites. INTRODUCTION Pulau Semakau (1 °12'N, 103°45'E) is approximately 10 kilometres south of the Singapore mainland (Fig. 1). It is presently uninhabited, with a jetty on the western side of the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Our Biodiversity Singapore’S National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan
    Conserving Our Biodiversity Singapore’s National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan National Parks Board 2009 Conserving Our Biodiversity 2009 Contents 3 Introduction 5 Principles & Goals Strategies and Actions 6 Strategy 1 Safeguard Our Biodiversity 9 Strategy 2 Consider Biodiversity Issues in Policy and Decision-making 11 Strategy 3 Improve Knowledge of Our Biodiversity and the Natural Environment 14 Strategy 4 Enhance Education and Public Awareness 17 Strategy 5 Strengthen Partnerships with All Stakeholders and Promote International Collaboration 20 Monitoring and Evaluation 2 Conserving Our Biodiversity 2009 Introduction “Conserving Our Biodiversity” maps out Singapore’s master plan for Singapore Today — A Garden City, A Haven biodiversity. It aims to promote biodiversity conservation, keeping for Biodiversity in mind that as a densely populated country with no hinterland, we would have to adopt a pragmatic approach to conservation and Singapore’s green policies, beginning with the “Garden City” plan develop unique solutions to our challenges. It intends to establish in the 1960s, and continuing into the next century as a “City in a both policy frameworks and specific measures to ensure better Garden” vision, have transformed the city-state into a distinctive and planning and co-ordination in the sustainable use, management and vibrant global city. The clean and green environment mitigates the conservation of our biodiversity. harsh concrete urban environment and improves our quality of life. This has allowed Singapore to meet the lifestyle and recreational Biodiversity conservation cannot be achieved with only efforts from needs of an increasingly sophisticated population, and enhanced one agency. A holistic approach must be adopted and the inputs Singapore’s attractiveness as a destination for foreign businesses of various public sector agencies and nature groups have been and talents.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for a Climate Resilient Singapore
    Preparing for a Climate Resilient Singapore This Urban Systems Study documents Singapore’s efforts to address climate change. Since its independence, Singapore has sought to balance economic development with concern for a clean and sustainable environment. As the seriousness of climate change STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS becomes clearer, efforts have been stepped up to mitigate carbon emissions and adapt to projected changes. Working domestically and cooperating internationally, Singapore has adopted innovative, forward-looking and integrative solutions to address this existential challenge, recognising that ultimately, a liveable city must be a climate resilient one. This book highlights Singapore’s past and ongoing efforts to reach this goal. “We only have our small precious island nation, so it is all the more important that we look after it well, not just for this generation but Resilient Singapore for a Climate Preparing for future generations of Singaporeans. Let us also work with friends around the world to protect our precious planet.” Preparing for a Teo Chee Hean, Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for National Security Chair of the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Climate Change (2011–Present) Climate Resilient Singapore Portrait_Line BW.pdf 1 4/26/12 1:09 PM PREPARING FOR A CLIMATE RESILIENT SINGAPORE Urban Systems Studies Books Water: From Scarce Resource to National Asset Transport: Overcoming Constraints, Sustaining Mobility Industrial Infrastructure: Growing in Tandem with the Economy Sustainable Environment: Balancing Growth
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Tan Meng Dui, CEO of the National Environment Agency Distinguished
    Mr Tan Meng Dui, CEO of the National Environment Agency Distinguished guests, Ladies and gentlemen, 1. It gives me great pleasure to be here today to commemorate Semakau Landfill’s 20th Anniversary. 2. Semakau Landfill is Singapore’s first – and only – offshore landfill. In fact, it is the first of its kind in the world! Developed in response to growing waste volumes amidst land constraints, Semakau Landfill was a uniquely bold and innovative approach, which has enabled us to achieve land use optimisation, efficient waste management and biodiversity conservation, all at the same time. You can say it is a “three-in-one”! It is a testament to Singapore’s engineering capability. It also demonstrates Singapore’s adaptability and ingenuity in coming up with novel solutions to meet our developmental needs in a sustainable manner. History of Semakau Landfill 3 . Let me share how Semakau Landfill came about. The name Semakau comes from the word bakau, which means “mangrove trees” in Malay. The development of Pulau Semakau into a refuse landfill was first outlined in Parliament in 1989. The ash from our incinerated waste, as well as a small amount of non- incinerable waste, were previously disposed of at two landfills located at Lim Chu Kang and Lorong Halus. As no other suitable landfill sites could be found on the main island, a decision was made to create a landfill by enclosing the waters between the eastern part of Pulau Semakau and the western part of Pulau Sakeng, thereby merging the two islands to form the new landfill. 4. Semakau Landfill was constructed in two phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Raptor Report Feb16
    Singapore Raptor Report Spring Migration, February 2016 Common Kestrel, adult male, Pulau Punggol Barat, 23 Feb 16, by Alfred Ng. Summary for migrant species: The Black Baza again claimed the top spot with 54 birds; the largest gathering was a flock of 21 birds at the Lorong Halus area. The Oriental Honey Buzzard was well represented by 30 birds, some of which had perched in urban areas such as the top of apartments. Five Japanese Sparrowhawks were recorded; at this time of the year, most of them showed signs of moult (which could make their wings look more pointed) and may be confused with the Chinese Sparrowhawk. Four Peregrine Falcons were recorded; among these, the 3 photographed were adults of the migrant race. Three Ospreys were recorded; 2 on the northern shores and 1 in the Central Catchment area. Two Jerdon's Bazas continued to winter at Tampines Eco Green; providing opportunities for birders to see this uncommon migrant. The juvenile Chinese Sparrowhawk with the falconry jesses on both tarsus was photographed again at Bidadari on the 18th. The uncommon Common Kestrel, a male, wintering at Punggol Barat was photographed on the 7th and the 23rd. An adult dark morph Common Buzzard was photographed at Changi on the evening of the 24th. There was a sighting report of a juvenile Rufous-bellied Hawk- Eagle at Labrador Park on the 16th; it may be useful to note that confusion with juvenile Changeable Hawk Eagle cannot be ruled out without photos. Lastly, a nocturnal raptor, the Northern Boobook (first discovered at Pasir Ris Park mangroves on 31st Jan) was photographed on the 1st and 2nd of Feb, after which it was not located again.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore, We Must Not Be Complacent
    CONTENTS We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors... we borrow it from our children. Ancient Proverb MINISTER’S MESSAGE 02 PRELUDE 04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 06 CHAPTER 1 18 Clean Air Always CHAPTER 2 28 Clean Water On Tap CHAPTER 3 38 Reduce, Reuse, Recycle CHAPTER 4 48 Conserving Nature CHAPTER 5 54 A Healthy Living Environment CHAPTER 6 64 International Cooperation CONCLUSION 72 ANNEX 74 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 80 MINISTER’S MESSAGE I am heartened to see so many people giving their views and time generously to the environmental cause and their participation will help the government to come up with more effective policies and programmes. OUR CHANGING ENVIRONMENT The recent media stories on environmental disasters such as hurricanes and floods are stark reminders of the transboundary and constantly changing nature of environmental issues. Although no disasters of similar magnitude and physical impact have happened in Singapore, we must not be complacent. It is still very important for us to continue caring for our environmental and water resources and at the same time, be prepared to tackle any challenge that may arise. PROGRESS SINCE 2002 The Singapore Green Plan 2012 (SGP 2012) is our blueprint towards environmental sustainability. Three years since its launch at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa, we have made good progress towards meeting the targets and in some cases, even exceeding them. The following are some examples: • Air quality in Singapore has been surpassing the 85% “good” range under
    [Show full text]
  • Safeguard a Place to Live SAFEGUARD NURTURE CHERISH 19 20 SAFEGUARD: a PLACE to LIVE
    18 SAFEGUARD: A PLACE TO LIVE Safeguard a place to live SAFEGUARD NURTURE CHERISH 19 20 SAFEGUARD: A PLACE TO LIVE “At the end of the day, if you want the sky of Singapore to be always blue, the land of Singapore to be always green, the water to be always clean, the public health to be always pink, it counts a lot on these many faceless heroes in MEWR, NEA, PUB as well as many faceless heroes in the industry and the workers in the environment sector. We have good people in MEWR and NEA. They know their jobs well, and they know the challenges we face. They are passionate and committed to meeting these challenges. Most of all, they are prepared to adapt to changing circumstances so as to meet new challenges with new mindsets.” — Lim Swee Say, Minister for the Environment (2002 - 2004) Snapshot. Singapore in the 1960s. Streets were more often than not cluttered with all kinds of refuse. One could see discarded tyres, bottles, nets and unidentifiable waste floating and choking up streams, canals and rivers. The water would be black, and stenches were often released. Right next to sawmills, workshops and factories, residences would be found, and people would live amidst the dust, noise and unpleasant smells. In a matter of decades, a complete transformation had taken place. Singapore had become clean. So much so that it is something we hardly think about today. Clean air, clean water, clean land. These do not come by accident. When Singapore gained self-governance in 1959, it inherited a heavily polluted environment, especially in the core of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Vegetation of Singapore
    FLORA OF SINGAPORE (Vol. 1: 47–70, 2019) 5. VEGETATION OF SINGAPORE A.T.K. Yee1, K.Y. Chong2, W.W. Seah3, H.K. Lua4 & S. Yang5 Singapore (1°21’07.6”N 103°49’11.3”E) is a tropical island-state situated south of Peninsular Malaysia, and north of the Riau Archipelago. Similar to tropical areas elsewhere, Singapore’s climate is characterised by abundant rainfall (mean annual: 2165.9 mm), and generally high temperature (diurnal range: 23–33°C) and humidity (mean annual relative: 83.9%) throughout the year (Meteorological Service Singapore, 2018). Singapore’s terrain is generally low-lying, with about three quarters of the island below 15 m. The highest point is the summit of Bukit Timah, which is at 163.63 m elevation (Wong, 2011). In 1963, the land area was 581.5 km2, and by 2018 had increased to 724.2 km2 through land reclamation (Singapore Land Authority, 2019). There are 62 offshore islands—the two largest (Pulau Ubin and Pulau Tekong) are located northeast of the main island, and the rest are mostly found south of the main island. Before the arrival of the British in 1819, Singapore was likely covered mostly by lowland mixed dipterocarp forest (Fig. 1), similar to the original forest that was dominant in this part of Southeast Asia (Corlett, 1991, 1992). Mangrove forest likely occurred near river mouths with the vegetation transiting into freshwater swamp forest further inland. Stretches of sandy beach and rocky shore would have lined parts of the coast. Early human settlements (fourteenth to eighteenth centuries) have been recorded at the mouths or estuaries of the Singapore River, Kallang River, Seletar River and Punggol River.
    [Show full text]