Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47628-7 — the Reception of the Virgin in Byzantium Edited by Thomas Arentzen , Mary B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47628-7 — the Reception of the Virgin in Byzantium Edited by Thomas Arentzen , Mary B Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47628-7 — The Reception of the Virgin in Byzantium Edited by Thomas Arentzen , Mary B. Cunningham Index More Information 349 Index Note : Page numbers in bold refer to tables; those in italic to i gures. An ‘n’ refers to a footnote, e.g. 250n30 refers to note 30 on p. 250. Abegg- Stit ung textile collection (Bern), in homilies, 265 , 265n29 ‘ M a r i a n s i l k ’ 2 2 – 2 3 , 3 9 represented in church structure and acrostics, use of, 159 , 171 , 175 , 175n30 , 194 , decoration, 80 , 83 – 84 , 93 , 99 – 105 , 194n14 , 209 100n104 Adam and Eve amulets and charms, Marian imagery as, 7 , in homilies, 298 – 99 , 299n60 , 299n61 50n16 , 58 – 60 , 59n40 in hymns and poetry, 88 , 156 , 173 – 74 , Anastasis (Resurrection) of Christ, 139 – 43 , 190 – 91 , 207 – 08 139 , 146 , 333n33 in Marian iconography, 117 , 138 , 140 , 141 , Andrew of Crete 141 , 301 on Annunciation, 264n25 , 264n26 , 264 – 65 , Mary as new Eve, 95 , 147 , 177 , 198 265n29 restored to paradise through Mary, 89 , on conception and birth of Mary, 65 , 67 , 89n66 , 264 140n52 , 142 see also Christopher (9th- c. hymnographer), on Dormition, 241 – 42 , 250 , 265 , 267 – 68 , On the Transgression of Adam 268n35 , 276 , 276n77 Adana medallions Great Kanon , 189 , 204n55 functions, 48 – 51 , 49n14 , 50n16 , 59 – 61 on Mary and Eucharist, 91 , 118 images and inscriptions, 46 – 48 , 47 , 47 , 48 , personal life, 258 , 258n4 , 274 48n11 , 51n18 socio- political consciousness, 276n80 , provenance, 46n7 , 48n9 276 – 78 , 277n83 , 277n84 , 280 Adelphia sarcophagus, Syracuse, 29 , 31 , 38 – 39 , work and inl uence, 181 , 259n6 , 259n7 , 313 38 , 4 2 Anna (Mary’s mother) Adoration of the Magi Davidic lineage, 140 , 141 , 314 , 314n27 on Adana medallions, 47 , 47 , 48 , 50 duration of pregnancy, 67 – 70 , 68n43 , at Daphni Monastery, 124 , 125 , 131 , 136 , 68n44 136 , 137 – 41 , 138 , 146 in homilies and hymns, 190 , 192 , 197 , p o p u l a r i t y a s v i s u a l m o t i f , 31 , 31n47 , 31n48 , 202n45 , 318 32 – 33 , 32 , 34n63 in Kokkinobaphos homilies, 301 , 301 reasons for popularity, 33n57 , 33 – 35 , and miraculous conception of Mary, 63 – 66 , 53 – 54 , 58 64n10 , 222 , 314 – 15 on Werden casket, 39 , 4 0 and presenting Mary to the Temple, 210 – 11 , Akathistos Hymn 315 , 323 Germanos’ homily on the, 273 , 274 – 75 role in Christ’s incarnation, 62 – 63 , 71 – 72 , importance, 81n16 72n62 metaphors for Mary, 82 , 83 , 86 , 87 , 88 , visual imagery of, 72 – 75 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 185 – 86 , 250 128 , 129 – 30 , 130n25 , 131 – 33 use of acrostics, 175 Annarichus (heretic monk), 223 – 25 Allen, P., 157n28 Annunciation to Anna and Joachim, 124 , altar cloth, 104 , 105n112 , 107 125 , 126 , 130 , 131 , 133 , 314 – 15 altar/ altar table, Mary as, 78 , 85 , 97 , 98 , A n n u n c i a t i o n t o M a r y 108 , 109 at Daphni Monastery, 124 , 125 , 128 , 134 , holding the eucharistic bread, 106 – 07 , 110 , 134n40 111 , 112 , 113 – 14 at the spring, 22 , 28 , 38 , 38 349 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47628-7 — The Reception of the Virgin in Byzantium Edited by Thomas Arentzen , Mary B. Cunningham Index More Information 350 350 Index Annunciation to Mary (cont.) Bakhtin, M., 154 in catacombs and sarcophagi, 26n24 , Balic, C., 328 26 – 28 , 28 baptism, royal baptisms linked to Christ’s, 53 , in early textiles, 20n12 , 20 – 22 , 21 , 54 – 57 , 53n26 56 , 58 , 59 – 61 Barker, M., 205n57 and entry into the temple, 202 – 04 , 211n73 , Barthes, R., 6 211n74 Basil of Caesarea, 100 , 103n111 , 103 – 05 , 107 , homilies and hymns for Feast of the, 108 , 212n75 , 309n3 , 335n42 151 – 53 , 152n6 , 204n54 , 261n14 , 264 – 66 , Basil (hymnographer), 194 , 198 336– 37n48 Bawit (Egypt) incarnation and Eucharist, 79 , 84 , 86 , 99 , Chapel LI, Marian iconography, 40 – 42 100n106 , 265n29 Monastery of Apollo, 114 Mary and visual narrative of, 6 , 35 , 41 , 97 Belting, H., 248 see also Adana medallions ; Schmidt Benedict of Nursia, 249 medallion Blachernai Church, Istanbul, 1 , 106 , 274 , Antonopoulou, T., 193 274n64 aphthartodocetism , 267 Blachernitissa apocryphal texts decorating panagiaria , 112 – 15 , 112 , defending the use of, 76 , 309n3 , 335n42 113n142 , 115n155 dei nition of, 2n4 , 309n4 , 342 eucharistic references, 106 – 11 , 109 , 110n127 use in Marian devotion, 5 , 8 , 11 , 29 , 323 Bodmer V papyrus, 68 , 68n42 see also Protevangelium of James Bolman, E., 114 Apollo Monastery, Bawit, 114 Booth, P., 225n28 , 311n13 a p s e , see s a n c t u a r y a p s e Boston, Museum of Fine Arts, textiles, 55 – 57 , Arentzen, T., 174 56 , 56n35 , 57n36 , 58 Arletti, R., 130 Bouras, C., 122n13 Ascension of Christ bridal chamber, Mary as, 190 , 206 , 278 Mary’s life at er the, 225 , 317 Bride of Christ as sanctuary decoration, 96 , 97 , 97n98 , 98 , Mary as, 95n91 , 200 – 01 , 202n45 , 203 , 206 100n104 visual representation of Mary as, 235 , 236 , sanctuary of St Neophytos’ Hermitage, 238 , 256 99 – 100 , 101 , 102 British Museum, child’s tunic, 55 sanctuary of St Sophia of Ohrid, 102 – 04 , Brock, S., 179n53 103 , 104 Broek, R. van den, 219 , 226 , 228 – 29 textual references, 239 , 286 brooch (gold), Medellín, 34 – 35 asceticism/ monasticism Brussels Museum of Fine Arts, tapestry- woven emphasis on Mary’s, 201 – 02 , 311 , 317 , 320 – 23 band, 55 – 56 , 57 – 58 , 57 reasons for focus on Mary’s, 3 , 193 , 193n8 , Buoninsegna, Duccio di, 235 , 235n3 , 235n1 , 309 – 10 , 344 236 , 238 Assumption of Mary development of the feast on the, 4 , 5 , 219 Calabuig, I., 152n6 homilies on, 219 , 239 – 41 , 252 – 55 Cameron, A., 13 , 70 and Mary as immortal/ heavenly Cana, marriage, 25 , 52n24 , 316 , 320 power, 220 , 227 , 231 , 234 Cappadocia, Kızıl Çukur church, 126n21 , visual representations of the, 235n4 , 237n5 , 126 – 30 , 206 237 – 39 , 240 , 242 , 243 – 48 c a p t i o n s see also Dormition ( Koimesis ) of the Virgin ; use of, 19n9 , 19 – 25 , 23n20 , 42 , 54n29 , heavenly ladder ( scala caelestis ), Mary as ; 60 – 61 Siena, cathedral window see also Adana medallions ; Schmidt Athanasius of Alexandria, 3 , 201 , 270 , 293 , medallion 296 , 321 , 336 – 37n48 catacombs Autpertus, Ambrosius Annunciation scene in, 26n24 , 26 – 27 , 28 homily on Assumption, 241 , 252n57 , Mary in iconography in, 18 , 23n20 , 32 – 33 252 – 55 , 256 Nativity and Adoration of the Magi in, 30 , Mary as heavenly ladder, 247 – 51 , 248n33 31 , 31n48 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47628-7 — The Reception of the Virgin in Byzantium Edited by Thomas Arentzen , Mary B. Cunningham Index More Information 351 Index 351 Cathedral of St Paul, Faras (Egypt and Sudan), Constas, Fr M., 314 St Anna’s iconography, 73 Cormack, R., 130 censer, Mary as, 84n39 , 84 – 85 , 202n45 Couch of Solomon, Mary as, 286 – 90 , censing of Mary by angels, 113 – 15 , 115n155 , 287n23 , 288 116 , 117 , 118 Council Chalcedon, Council of (451), 11 , 260 , 260n12 of Chalcedon (451), 11 , 260 , 260n12 chalice, see paten/ chalice, Mary as of Constantinople III (680– 1), 257 , 261 Chalkoprateia Church, Constantinople, 274 of Ephesus (431), 4 , 17 , 42 – 43 , 260 , 263 Chapel LI, Bawit, 40 – 42 of Nicaea II (787), 332 , 332n30 charms and amulets, Marian imagery as, 7 , Crone, P., 231 – 33 50n16 , 58 – 60 , 59n40 Crucii xion Cheesefare Sunday, liturgy, 180n2 , 180 – 81 in Daphni Monastery decoration, 121 , 124 , Chicago, Field Museum, tunic, 55 126 , 137 , 142 – 44 , 143 , 146 Chios, Nea Moni Monastery, see Nea Moni and divine suf ering, 333 – 35 , 334n40 Monastery, Chios Cunningham, M. B., 69 , 118n160 , 134 , 330 Chora Monastery, Constantinople, 91 – 92 , 92 , Cyprus, Church of Panagia Podithou, 111n137 , 127 , 132n33 sanctuary apse, 115n155 , 118 Chorikios of Gaza, 37 – 38 (ps- ) Cyril of Jerusalem, Homily on the Christopher (9th- c. hymnographer), On the h eotokos Transgression of Adam on Anna’s pregnancy, 69 Adam’s appeal to Mary to reopen authorship of homily, 217 , 219 – 20 Paradise, 182 – 86 confronting false teachers, 223 – 25 as kanon hymn, 9 , 180 – 82 , 185n19 , 191 on Mary’s death and assumption, 218 – 19 , Mary as co- redeemer, 187 – 89 226 – 27 Mary and Eve, 189 – 90 refuting the belief in Mary as heavenly Mary as Paradise, 190 – 91 power, 217 , 222 – 23 , 225 – 26 Mary as portal of salvation, 186 – 87 sources for the false belief, 227 – 34 Chrysostom, John, see John Chrysostom unique narrative in, 221 Church of Christ’s Transi guration, Zouridi, 74 Church of the Dormition, Nicaea, 145 , 145n71 Daphni Monastery (Athens) ciborium (canopy above the altar) Adoration of the Magi and the Anastasis, in Eisodia and Hypapante imagery, 92 , 93 137 – 41 , 138 , 139 in images of Eucharist and Communion of A n n u n c i a t i o n s c e n e , 128 , 134 the Apostles, 78 , 85 , 98 , 103 , 106 , 107 , 109 Birth of the Virgin and Crucii xion of meaning, 84 , 92 Christ, 121 , 142 – 44 , 142 , 143 clavi and roundels, Marian imagery on, 55n32 , Dormition ( Koimesis ) of Mary, 120 , 144 55 – 58 , 56 , 56n35 , 57n36 , 57 iconography associated with Last Supper, c l o t h i n g , see garments 131n32 , 133 , 133n36 , 133n37 Communion of the Apostles iconography of Joachim and Anna, 126 , in apse of St Clement of Ohrid Church, 131 – 33 , 132n33 78 , 98 Mary at the temple, 127 , 128 , 133n37 , Mary’s eucharistic signii cance in images of, 133 – 34 85 , 96n96 , 96 – 98 , 109 Mary’s life story in iconography, 5 , 123 – 31 , in St Sophia Church (Ohrid), 100 – 06 , 103 , 124 , 146 – 47 106 , 108
Recommended publications
  • Santa Fosca in Torcello and the Middle Byzantine Churches in Eastern Greece: Preliminary Comparison and Remarks on Common Features and Differences
    Athens Journal of History January 2016 Santa Fosca in Torcello and the Middle Byzantine Churches in Eastern Greece: Preliminary Comparison and Remarks on Common Features and Differences By Antonella Manzo The main aim of this work is to critically examine Santa Fosca building period through the analysis of the similarities as well as the differences with some churches located in Greece and belonging to the so-called octagonal domed type. In fact, since the second half of the Nineteenth century a historiographical tradition has compared Santa Fosca with these Greek Middle-Byzantine churches, where eight supports, piers or columns, arranged in a regular or irregular octagon, receive the loads from the cupola. The comparison is based on the direct analysis of these buildings: the structural configuration, the constructive materials and techniques as well as the affinities in decoration, occurring both inside and outside, are under investigation. This contribution offers a new perspective, from which it could be possible to study the period of erection of the Venetian church, a topic that is still object of debate among the scientific community. Introduction Torcello is an island belonging to the Northern Venetian Laguna, which lives its golden age during the X-XI century AD: in his Administrando Imperio of 927 Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus defines Torcello as emporion mega, to testify the great importance of its intense trades with the Orient. The church of Santa Fosca is located on the island at the Southern side of the ancient Basilica of Santa Maria Assunta, whose origins date back to the inscription of 639 AD, discovered during the excavations of 1895.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transfiguration in the Theology of Gregory Palamas And
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 2015 Deus in se et Deus pro nobis: The rT ansfiguration in the Theology of Gregory Palamas and Its Importance for Catholic Theology Cory Hayes Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Hayes, C. (2015). Deus in se et Deus pro nobis: The rT ansfiguration in the Theology of Gregory Palamas and Its Importance for Catholic Theology (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/640 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEUS IN SE ET DEUS PRO NOBIS: THE TRANSFIGURATION IN THE THEOLOGY OF GREGORY PALAMAS AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR CATHOLIC THEOLOGY A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Cory J. Hayes May 2015 Copyright by Cory J. Hayes 2015 DEUS IN SE ET DEUS PRO NOBIS: THE TRANSFIGURATION IN THE THEOLOGY OF GREGORY PALAMAS AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR CATHOLIC THEOLOGY By Cory J. Hayes Approved March 31, 2015 _______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Bogdan Bucur Dr. Radu Bordeianu Associate Professor of Theology Associate Professor of Theology (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) _______________________________ Dr. Christiaan Kappes Professor of Liturgy and Patristics Saints Cyril and Methodius Byzantine Catholic Seminary (Committee Member) ________________________________ ______________________________ Dr. James Swindal Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Maximus the Confessor and His Defense of Papal Primacy
    Love that unites and vanishes: Saint Maximus the Confessor and his defense of papal primacy Author: Jason C. LaLonde Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108614 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2019 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Love that Unites and Vanishes: Saint Maximus the Confessor and his Defense of Papal Primacy Thesis for the Completion of the Licentiate in Sacred Theology Boston College School of Theology and Ministry Fr. Jason C. LaLonde, S.J. Readers: Fr. Brian Dunkle, S.J., BC-STM Dr. Adrian Walker, Catholic University of America May 3, 2019 2 Introduction 3 Chapter One: Maximus’s Palestinian Provenance: Overcoming the Myth of the Greek Life 10 Chapter Two: From Monoenergism to Monotheletism: The Role of Honorius 32 Chapter Three: Maximus on Roman Primacy and his Defense of Honorius 48 Conclusion 80 Appendix – Translation of Opusculum 20 85 Bibliography 100 3 Introduction The current research project stems from my work in the course “Latin West, Greek East,” taught by Fr. Brian Dunkle, S.J., at the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry in the fall semester of 2016. For that course, I translated a letter of Saint Maximus the Confessor (580- 662) that is found among his works known collectively as the Opuscula theologica et polemica.1 My immediate interest in the text was Maximus’s treatment of the twin heresies of monoenergism and monotheletism. As I made progress
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Marian Doctrine As
    INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO in affiliation with the PONTIFICAL THEOLOGICAL FACULTY MARIANUM ROME, ITALY By: Elizabeth Marie Farley The Development of Marian Doctrine as Reflected in the Commentaries on the Wedding at Cana (John 2:1-5) by the Latin Fathers and Pastoral Theologians of the Church From the Fourth to the Seventeenth Century A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Sacred Theology with specialization in Marian Studies Director: Rev. Bertrand Buby, S.M. Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute University of Dayton 300 College Park Dayton, OH 45469-1390 2013 i Copyright © 2013 by Elizabeth M. Farley All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Nihil obstat: François Rossier, S.M., STD Vidimus et approbamus: Bertrand A. Buby S.M., STD – Director François Rossier, S.M., STD – Examinator Johann G. Roten S.M., PhD, STD – Examinator Thomas A. Thompson S.M., PhD – Examinator Elio M. Peretto, O.S.M. – Revisor Aristide M. Serra, O.S.M. – Revisor Daytonesis (USA), ex aedibus International Marian Research Institute, et Romae, ex aedibus Pontificiae Facultatis Theologicae Marianum, die 22 Augusti 2013. ii Dedication This Dissertation is Dedicated to: Father Bertrand Buby, S.M., The Faculty and Staff at The International Marian Research Institute, Father Jerome Young, O.S.B., Father Rory Pitstick, Joseph Sprug, Jerome Farley, my beloved husband, and All my family and friends iii Table of Contents Prėcis.................................................................................. xvii Guidelines........................................................................... xxiii Abbreviations...................................................................... xxv Chapter One: Purpose, Scope, Structure and Method 1.1 Introduction...................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Christianity-Timeline.Pdf
    Pagan Empire Christian Empire 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1 AD Second 'Bishop' of Rome. Pupil of Student of Polycarp. First system- Bishop of Nyssa, brother of Basil. Pope. The Last Father of the Peter. Author of a letter to Corinth, atic theologian, writing volumi- Bishop of Original and sophisticated theologi- model of St Gregory the Church. First of the St John of (1 Clement), the earliest Christian St Clement of Rome nously about the Gospels and the St Irenaeus St Cyprian Carthage. an, writing on Trinitarian doctrine Gregory of Nyssa an ideal Scholastics. Polymath, document outside the NT. church, and against heretics. and the Nicene creed. pastor. Great monk, and priest. Damascus Former disciple of John the Baptist. Prominent Prolific apologist and exegete, the Archbishop of Constantinople, St Leo the Pope. Able administrator in very Archbishop of Seville. Encyclopaedist disciple of Jesus, who became a leader of the most important thinker between Paul brother of Basil. Greatest rhetorical hard times, asserter of the prima- and last great scholar of the ancient St Peter Judean and later gentile Christians. Author of two St Justin Martyr and Origen, writing on every aspect stylist of the Fathers, noted for St Gregory Nazianzus cy of the see of Peter. Central to St Isidore world, a vital link between the learning epistles. Source (?) of the Gospel of Mark. of life, faith and worship. writing on the Holy Spirit. Great the Council of Chalcedon. of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Claimed a knowledge and vision of Jesus independent Pupil of Justin Martyr. Theologian.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecumenical Councils Preparing for Next Week (Disciple 6–Eucharist 1)
    January St. Dominic’s RCIA Program Disciple The Church: 15 History & Teaching 4 Goal • Having switched the Disciple 4 & 5 weeks, we looks at an overview of the Sacraments last week (Disciple 5), and explored the Sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation. These Sacraments are two of the three that initiate us into the Church community, and into Christ’s body and mission. This week we’ll continue to unpack the meaning of Church by looking broadly at its history one the last 2000 years. We’ll also explore it’s role as Teacher. How does the Church function in and through history? How does God walk with the Church through it all? Agenda • Welcome/Housekeeping (10) • Questions & Answers • Introduction to the Rosary (15) Discussion (15): • If the Church is The Body of Christ, what does this mean for Christ’s presence in the world through history and in the world today? • What do I admire about the Catholic Church’s activity in history? Does any part of the Church’s activity in history disturb or upset me? • How do I (might I) listen to what the Church has to say today? What is my approach/attitude to the Church as “Teacher”? • Presentation: The Church: History (35) • Break (10) • Presentation: The Church: Teaching & Belief (30) • Discussion (time permitting): • What is special to this moment in history? • What is the Good News of Christ & the Church that speaks to this moment in history? • How can the body of Christ proclaim & witness the Gospel and walk with others today? Housekeeping Notes • Rite of Acceptance: February 10th at the 11:30am and 5:30 Masses.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of St Anna's Cult in Byzantium
    ASPECTS OF ST ANNA’S CULT IN BYZANTIUM by EIRINI PANOU A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2011 Acknowledgments It is said that a PhD is a lonely work. However, this thesis, like any other one, would not have become reality without the contribution of a number of individuals and institutions. First of all of my academical mother, Leslie Brubaker, whose constant support, guidance and encouragement accompanied me through all the years of research. Of the National Scholarship Foundation of Greece ( I.K.Y.) with its financial help for the greatest part of my postgraduate studies. Of my father George, my mother Angeliki and my bother Nick for their psychological and financial support, and of my friends in Greece (Lily Athanatou, Maria Sourlatzi, Kanela Oikonomaki, Maria Lemoni) for being by my side in all my years of absence. Special thanks should also be addressed to Mary Cunningham for her comments on an early draft of this thesis and for providing me with unpublished material of her work. I would like also to express my gratitude to Marka Tomic Djuric who allowed me to use unpublished photographic material from her doctoral thesis. Special thanks should also be addressed to Kanela Oikonomaki whose expertise in Medieval Greek smoothened the translation of a number of texts, my brother Nick Panou for polishing my English, and to my colleagues (Polyvios Konis, Frouke Schrijver and Vera Andriopoulou) and my friends in Birmingham (especially Jane Myhre Trejo and Ola Pawlik) for the wonderful time we have had all these years.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Heaven on Earth
    Heaven on Earth The Eastern part of the Roman empire from the mid 5 th century to the mid 15 th century is referred to as the Byzantine Empire [62] but that term 8 would not have meant anything to the people living either in the Eastern or the Western parts of the Roman Empire at the time. The residents of the East thought of them- 62 selves as “Romans” as Map of the maximum extent much as the residents of of the Byzantine Empire (edited map: xenohistorian.faithweb.com/ the West did. In fact, Con- europe/eu08.html ) stantine the Great had The Byzantine Empire expanded moved the capital of the and contracted many times from Roman Empire in 330 476, when the last emperor of the from “old” Rome in the Western Roman Empire abdi- West to what he called cated, until its demise in 1453. The “New” Rome ( Nova map gives us some idea of the core of the Byzantine Empire’s Roma ) in the East. There political and cultural influence. was already a city in the new location, Byzantion, and that is where the term Byzantine comes from. The name Constantinople was given to the new capital after the death of Constantine. Constantinople grew in power, cultural, and diplo- matic influence while old Rome was repeatedly plundered by barbarians. By the end of the 5 th century the Western Roman Empire was out of busi- ness. So it was that the citizens in the East saw themselves as simply the continuation of the Roman Empire. We call that remnant of the old em- pire in the east, Byzantium, in recognition of the changed political situa- tion centered on Constantinople between 476 and 1453.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pseudo-Kufic Ornament and the Problem of Cross-Cultural Relationships Between Byzantium and Islam
    The pseudo-kufic ornament and the problem of cross-cultural relationships between Byzantium and Islam Silvia Pedone – Valentina Cantone The aim of the paper is to analyze pseudo-kufic ornament Dealing with a much debated topic, not only in recent in Byzantine art and the reception of the topic in Byzantine times, as that concerning the role and diffusion of orna- Studies. The pseudo-kufic ornamental motifs seem to ment within Byzantine art, one has often the impression occupy a middle position between the purely formal that virtually nothing new is possible to add so that you abstractness and freedom of arabesque and the purely have to repeat positions, if only involuntarily, by now well symbolic form of a semantic and referential mean, borrowed established. This notwithstanding, such a topic incessantly from an alien language, moreover. This double nature (that gives rise to questions and problems fueling the discussion is also a double negation) makes of pseudo-kufic decoration of historical and theoretical issues: a debate that has been a very interesting liminal object, an object of “transition”, going on for longer than two centuries. This situation is as it were, at the crossroad of different domains. Starting certainly due to a combination of reasons, but ones hav- from an assessment of the theoretical questions raised by ing a close connection with the history of the art-historical the aesthetic peculiarities of this kind of ornament, we discipline itself. In the present paper our aim is to focus on consider, from this specific point of view, the problem of a very specific kind of ornament, the so-called pseudo-kufic the cross-cultural impact of Islamic and islamicizing formal inscriptions that rise interesting pivotal questions – hither- repertory on Byzantine ornament, focusing in particular on to not so much explored – about the “interference” between a hitherto unpublished illuminated manuscript dated to the a formalistic approach and a functionalistic stance, with its 10th century and held by the Marciana Library in Venice.
    [Show full text]
  • Thessaloniki Monuments & Events
    Thessaloniki Monuments & Events Nikolaos-Grigorios Karapostolou SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS, BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION & LEGAL STUDIES A dissertation submitted for the degree of Master of Science (MSc) in Hospitality and Tourism Management Thessaloniki – Greece 2017 Student Name: Nikolaos-Grigorios Karapostolou SID: 1109150019 Supervisor: Dr. Katsaliaki I hereby declare that the work submitted is mine and that where I have made use of another’s work, I have attributed the source(s) according to the Regulations set in the Student’s Handbook. [2] Abstract This dissertation is written as part of the MSc in Hospitality and Tourism Management at the International Hellenic University. This dissertation explores the possibilities of expanding the touristic activities and events that take place in Thessaloniki transforming it into an eventful city taking advantage of the UNESCO monuments and more specifically the religious ones. Firstly, the current situation is analyzed by identifying its positioning. In order to identify the current position, a thorough research will be held, identifying the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of the city of Thessaloniki. In addition, the functioning of the processes will be analyzed that together with the protection (tangible and intangible wise) will eventually lead to the enhancement and promotion of Thessaloniki as an eventful city that combines modern touristic activities with the promotion of its historical-cultural monuments. Keywords: Thessaloniki, UNESCO, Monuments, Culture, Events, Marketing Pan
    [Show full text]
  • HIST 359 Biography of an Empire: the Surprising Life of ‘Byzantium’
    Syllabus HIST 359 Biography of an Empire: the Surprising Life of ‘Byzantium’. Fall Semester 2018 M/W 15:30-17:10 Room CB-1 Instructor: Dimitra Kotoula, PhD., Lecturer Web URL: https://courtauld.academia.edu/DimitraKotoula Course Description The course explores the history and life of the Eastern Roman empire, the so-called ‘Byzantium’. The empire encompassed and extended well beyond the Mediterranean region and survived for over a thousand of years: from its Christianization in the 4th century AD up to the fall of its capital, Constantinople, to the Ottoman Turks in 1453. By which means was an empire of this magnitude able to negotiate its survival over the course of a millennium? In examining the issue, particular attention will be paid to the investigation of the prevailing social, political and economic conditions in the region, as well as the massive changes in culture, religion, demography, geography and ideology that Byzantium first introduced to the Greco-Roman world that it had inherited. The empire, throughout its extraordinary life, promulgated and maintained a unique ideology that was, paradoxically, able to protect an image of timelessness and unchanging order, while at the same time accomplishing transformation and innovation that allowed the Byzantines to compete with and relate to their neighbours to the East and West at key moments in the empire’s long history. Besides the narrative of main historical events, special emphasis will be given throughout this course, to the character and riches of this unique civilization identifying the fundamental questions about Byzantium- what it ultimately was, and what special significance, if any, it holds for us today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ruin of the Roman Empire
    7888888888889 u o u o u o u THE o u Ruin o u OF THE o u Roman o u o u EMPIRE o u o u o u o u jamesj . o’donnell o u o u o u o u o u o u o hjjjjjjjjjjjk This is Ann’s book contents Preface iv Overture 1 part i s theoderic’s world 1. Rome in 500: Looking Backward 47 2. The World That Might Have Been 107 part ii s justinian’s world 3. Being Justinian 177 4. Opportunities Lost 229 5. Wars Worse Than Civil 247 part iii s gregory’s world 6. Learning to Live Again 303 7. Constantinople Deflated: The Debris of Empire 342 8. The Last Consul 364 Epilogue 385 List of Roman Emperors 395 Notes 397 Further Reading 409 Credits and Permissions 411 Index 413 About the Author Other Books by James J. O’ Donnell Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher preface An American soldier posted in Anbar province during the twilight war over the remains of Saddam’s Mesopotamian kingdom might have been surprised to learn he was defending the westernmost frontiers of the an- cient Persian empire against raiders, smugglers, and worse coming from the eastern reaches of the ancient Roman empire. This painful recycling of history should make him—and us—want to know what unhealable wound, what recurrent pathology, what cause too deep for journalists and politicians to discern draws men and women to their deaths again and again in such a place. The history of Rome, as has often been true in the past, has much to teach us.
    [Show full text]