DOCSLIB.ORG

The Protection of Pome Fruits, March 1985-May 1992 : Citations from AGRICOLA Concerning Diseases and Other En- Vironmental Considerations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Protection of Pome Fruits, March 1985-May 1992 : Citations from AGRICOLA Concerning Diseases and Other En- Vironmental Considerations Historic, Archive Document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. united S,3.es ' (^'^^ __ aj "iS^r'Agriculture The Protedtion of National Agricultural Library Pome Fruits, March 1 985 - May 1 992 United States Environmental Protection Agency Citations from AGRICOI_A Office of Pesticide Programs Concerning Diseases and Otiier Bibliographies Environmental Considerations and Literature of Agriculture Number 118 August 1 992 United States Department of Agriculture The Protection of National Agricultural Pome Fruits, Library United States IVIarch 1985 -IVlay 1992 Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Citations from AGRICOLA Progranns Concerning Diseases and Otiier Bibliographies and Literature Environmental Considerations of Agriculture Number 118 August 1992 Compiled and Edited by Charles N. Bebee National Agricultural Library United States Department of Agriculture Beltsville, Maryland 20705 and United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Washington, D.C. 20460 National Agricultural Library Beltsville, Maryland 1992 National Agricultural Library Cataloging Record: Bebee, Charles N. The protection of pome fruits, March 1985-May 1992 : citations from AGRICOLA concerning diseases and other en- vironmental considerations. (Bibliographies and literature of agriculture ; no. 118) 1. Fruit — Diseases and pests — Bibliography. I. Title. aZ5076.AlU54no.118 . FOREWORD This is the 45th volume in a series of commodity-oriented environmental bibliographies resulting from a memorandum of understanding between the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library (USDA-NAL) , and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs (EPA-OPP) This close working relationship between the two agencies will produce a series of bibliographies which will be useful to EPA in the regulation of pesticides, as well as to any researcher in the field of plant or commodity protection. The broad scope of information contained in this series will benefit USDA, EPA, and the agricultural community as a whole. The sources referenced in these bibliographies include the majority of the latest available information from U.S. publications involving commodity protection throughout the growing and processing stages for each agricultural commodity We welcome the opportunity to join this cooperative effort between USDA and EPA in support of the national agricultural community. JOSEPH H. HOWARD, Director DOUGLAS D. CAMPT, Director National Agricultural Library Office of Pesticide Programs . INTRODUCTION The citations in this bibliography, The Protection of Pome Fruits, March 1985 - May 1992, are selected from the AGRICOLA database and cover diseases, insects, nematodes, weeds, chemicals, and other environmental considerations. A previous bibliography in this series was issued as BLA 41 in 1985. This is the 45th volume in a series of commodity-oriented listings of citations from AGRICOLA jointly sponsored by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library (USDA-NAL) , and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs (EPA-OPP) . During the past year, subjects in this series included The Protection of Stored Grains; The Protection of Nut Crops; The Protection of Peanuts; The Protection of Tomatoes, Egg Plants, and Peppers; and The Protection of Lawn and Turf Grasses. Other titles to be issued during the current year are The Protection of Corn, Biotechnology in Agriculture, and Methylbromide and Its Alternatives As Fumigants. Entries in the bibliography are subdivided into a series of section headings used in the contents of the Bibliography of Agriculture. Each item appears under every section heading assigned to the cited document. A personal author index accompanies this publication. Subject and site indices may be obtained after January 1993 by writing to the address below. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency contact for this project is Richard B. Peacock, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances Any comments or questions concerning this bibliography may be addressed to: Reference and User Services Branch USDA-NAL, Room 14 02 Beltsville, MD 20705 (301) 504-6875 I i i AVAILABILITY OF CITED DOCUMENTS Non-USDA Patrons The materials listed in this bibliography are available on interlibrary loan through your local library. The librarian in your public. State, university, or corporate library can assist you in obtaining materials either in your area or directly from the National Agricultural Library. Current charges for photocopies are $5 for the first 10 pages, $3 for each additional 10 pages, $5 for the first fiche, and $.50 for each additional fiche. Invoices are issued quarterly. Requests must comply with the National or International Interlibrary Loan Code. If you have questions about the availability of these materials, please write to: Document Delivery Services Branch National Agricultural Library Beltsville, MD 20705 USDA Patrons The materials listed in this bibliography may be obtained by submitting one Form AD-24 5 for each item requested to your local Agency or Regional Document Delivery System Library or directly to the National Agricultural Library, Document Delivery Services Branch. EPA BIBLIOGRAPHY The Protection of Pome Fruits, March 1985 - May 1992 Contents Item Number Research 1 Geography 2 Meteorology and Climatology 3-6 History 7-8 Education and Training - Not Extension 9-11 U.S. Extension Services 12-15 Administration 16 Legislation 17-37 Economics 38-39 Economics of Agricultural Production 40-53 Farm Organization and Management 54-87 Cooperatives 88 Rural Sociology 89 Distribution and Marketing 90-131 Grading, Standards, Labelling 132-137 Consumer Economics 138-141 Plant Production - General 142 Plant Production - Horticultural Crops 143-320 Plant Production - Field Crops 321 Plant Production - Miscellaneous Crops 322 Plant Breeding 323-411 Plant Structure 412-416 Plant Nutrition 417-433 Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 434-496 Plant Taxonomy and Geography 497-499 Protection of Plants 500-533 Pests of Plants - General and Misc. 534-555 Pests of Plants - Insects 556-912 Pests of Plants - Nematodes 913-929 Plant Diseases - General 930-952 Plant Diseases - Fungal 953-1167 Plant Diseases - Bacterial 1168-1230 Plant Diseases - Viral 1231-1243 Plant Diseases - Physiological 1244-1293 Miscellaneous Plant Disorders 1294-1319 Protection of Plant Products - General and Misc. 1320-1389 Protection of Plant Products - Insects 1390-1395 Weeds 1396-1412 Pesticides - General 1413- 1478 Soil Biology 1479- 1481 — ooi± cneinistjry ana fnysics 14 o «i 14 y 1 Soil Classification and Genesis 14 92 oOxx reruixiuy ~ r ejru.iiizeirs 14 y J — Id J 1 Soil Cultivation 1532-"1 c o o 154 8 Forestry Related 1549- 1557 roresu injuries ana irrouecuion 15 5oc o Entomology Related 1559--y c c f\ 1584 Apiculture Related 1585- 1587 Animal oeneuics 15o1 c o o — 1589T c o rk 1 C Q A —_ /inimai rveproaucuion 1 D y (J loy 4 Animal ricoiogy loyT C Q oC —_ 16U1 — 1 n 1 1 13 U ^ 1 o U J Animal Physiology and Biochemistry 1604- 1605 Animal laxonomy ana ueograpny 160 7- 1610 veterinary Fnarmacoiogy , loxicoiogy and Immune Therapeutic Agents 1611- 1612 Pest of Animals — Insects 1613- 1614 Aquaculture Related 16 15 Farm Equipment 1616- 1618 Water Resources 16 19 Drainage and Irrigation 152 0- 162 6 r ooa bcience — norcicuicurai crop 1 ^ ^7 1649 Food Processing — Horticultural Crop 1650-1 cr r\ 1657 1 c o — r ooa bcorage ~ noruicuiuurai crop 1 D Do 1 / U 1 Food Contamination — Horticultural Crop 17 02- 171 ^7 2-1 3 Food Packaging — Horticultural 1724- 17 2 6 — r ooa L.omposiuion — normcuiuurai crop 1 / 2 / 1/64 Home Food and Meal Preparation 17 65 Pollution 1766- 1773 Mathematics and Statistics 1774- 1806 Documentation 1807- 1817 nuiUdll ricUK^lilc: / rlcclll-Il dllU OdlcUy 1 O 1 O 1 O ^ 1 Index Paqe Author Index 261-273 EPA BIBLIOGRAPHY RESEARCH 0001 Invest in research. WEFGA. Sulecki, J.C. Willoughby, Ohio : Meister Pub. Co. Western fruit grower. Jan 1988. v. 108 (1). p. 25-27. (NAL Call No.: DNAL 80 G85W). 1 A . GEOGRAPHY 0002 Use of thematic mapper data for the detection of forest damage caused by the pear thrips. RSEEA. Voge 1 mann , J.E. Rock, B.N. New York, N.Y. : Elsevier Science Publishing. Remote sensing of environment. Dec 1989. v. 30 (3). p. 217-225. ill., maps. Includes references. (NAL Cal 1 No. : DNAL 0184. R4) 2 METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY 0003 Division of Entomology /C.H. Fernald. Horticultural Department / Samuel T. Maynard. Department of Meteorology / CD. Warner. Fernald, C. H. 1838-1921. Maynard, Samuel Warner, ; Clarence T ._1844- 1923 . Duane. Amherst, Mass. : Hatch Experiment Station of the Massachusetts Agricultural College, 1888. 16 p. : ill. ; 23 cm. (NAL Call No.: DNAL 100 M38H ( 1 ) no. 1 ) . 0004 Effects of temperature and relative humidity on germination, growth, and sporulation of Zygophiala jamaicensis. PHYTAd. Ocamb-Basu. CM. Sutton, T.B. St. Paul, Minn. : American Phytopathological Society. Phytopathology. Jan 1988. v. 78 (1). p. 100-103. Includes references. (NAL Call No.: DNAL 464.8 P56). 0005 Panel --frost control survey results. PWHAA. Evans, R. Peterson, B.; Graves, B. Wenatchee, Wash. : The Association. Proceedings - Washington State Horticultural Association. 1985. (81st). p. 203-216. (NAL Call No.: DNAL 81 W273). 0006 Validation of injury thresholds for European red mite (Acari : Tetranychidae) on 'Yorking' and 'Delicious' apple. JEENAI. Hull, L.A. Beers, E.H. Lanham. Md. Entomological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inventory and Review of Quantitative Models for Spread of Plant Pests for Use in Pest Risk Assessment for the EU Territory1
    EFSA supporting publication 2015:EN-795 EXTERNAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT Inventory and review of quantitative models for spread of plant pests for use in pest risk assessment for the EU territory1 NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology 2 Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK ABSTRACT This report considers the prospects for increasing the use of quantitative models for plant pest spread and dispersal in EFSA Plant Health risk assessments. The agreed major aims were to provide an overview of current modelling approaches and their strengths and weaknesses for risk assessment, and to develop and test a system for risk assessors to select appropriate models for application. First, we conducted an extensive literature review, based on protocols developed for systematic reviews. The review located 468 models for plant pest spread and dispersal and these were entered into a searchable and secure Electronic Model Inventory database. A cluster analysis on how these models were formulated allowed us to identify eight distinct major modelling strategies that were differentiated by the types of pests they were used for and the ways in which they were parameterised and analysed. These strategies varied in their strengths and weaknesses, meaning that no single approach was the most useful for all elements of risk assessment. Therefore we developed a Decision Support Scheme (DSS) to guide model selection. The DSS identifies the most appropriate strategies by weighing up the goals of risk assessment and constraints imposed by lack of data or expertise. Searching and filtering the Electronic Model Inventory then allows the assessor to locate specific models within those strategies that can be applied.
    [Show full text]
  • “There Would Doubtless Be a Just Feeling of Pride
    “There would doubtless be a just feeling of pride and satisfaction in the heart of a naturalist who could say that he had made himself thoroughly acquainted with all the species of a particular group of animals, had learned their most secret habits, and mastered their several relations to the objects, animate and inanimate, which surrounded them. But perhaps a still keener pleasure is enjoyed by one who carries about with him some problem of the kind but partially solved, and who, holding in his hand the clue which shall guide him onwards, sees in each new place that he visits fresh opportunities of discovery.” J. Traherne Moggridge Harvesting Ants and Trap-door Spiders, page 180 Saville, Edwards and Co., London 1874 University of Alberta Composition and structure of spider assemblages in layers of the mixedwood boreal forest after variable retention harvest by Jaime H. Pinzón A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Wildlife Ecology and Management Department of Renewable Resources ©Jaime H. Pinzón Fall 2011 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Arboreal Spiders (Araneae) on Balsam Fir and Spruces I N East-Central Maine
    Jennings, D . T. and J. B. Dimond. 1988. Arboreal spiders (Araneae) on balsam fir and spruces i n East-Central Maine . J. Arachnol ., 16:223-235 . ARBOREAL SPIDERS (ARANEAE) ON BALSAM FIR AND SPRUCES IN EAST-CENTRAL MAIN E Daniel T. Jennings Northeastern Forest Experiment Statio n USDA Building, University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 USA and John B. Dimond Department of Entomology University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 USA ABSTRACT Spiders of 11 families, 22 genera, and at least 33 species were collected from crown foliage samples of Abies balsamea (L .) Mill., Picea rubens Sarg., and Picea glauca (Moench) Voss in east-central Maine. For both study years (1985, 1986), spider species composition varied by foraging strategy (we b spinner, hunter) and among 10 study sites . Numbers, life stages, and sex ratios of spiders also differe d between study years. Spider densities per m 2 of foliage area generally were greater (P 0 .05) o n spruces Cit. = 16.3 ± 1 .1) than on fir (X = 10.9 ± 1 .0). Estimates of absolute populations of arboreal spiders ranged from 35,139 to 323,080/ha ; of spruce budworm from 271,401 to 6,122,919/ha. Spider- budworm densities/ha covaried significantly (P 5 0.001) each year (r = 0.84, 1985 ; r = 0.71, 1986). None of the measured forest-stand parameters (basal area, tree species percentage) were reliabl e predictors of spider populations/ha . INTRODUCTION Recent devastating outbreaks of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumife- rana (Clem.), have renewed interest in determining potential natural enemies o f this defoliator of northeastern spruce-fir forests .
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Categorisation of Anthonomus Quadrigibbus
    SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 22 March 2018 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5245 Pest categorisation of Anthonomus quadrigibbus EFSA Panel on Plant Health (EFSA PLH Panel), Michael Jeger, Claude Bragard, David Caffier, Thierry Candresse, Elisavet Chatzivassiliou, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Gianni Gilioli, Jean-Claude Gregoire, Josep Anton Jaques Miret, Maria Navajas Navarro, Bjorn€ Niere, Stephen Parnell, Roel Potting, Trond Rafoss, Vittorio Rossi, Gregor Urek, Ariena Van Bruggen, Wopke Van der Werf, Jonathan West, Stephan Winter, Ciro Gardi and Alan MacLeod Abstract The Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the weevil Anthonomus quadrigibbus Say, (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), for the EU. A. quadrigibbus is a well-defined and distinguishable species, recognised as an occasional pest of apples, pears and sour cherries in North America where it also feeds on a range of wild rosaceous plants such as Crataegus and Amelanchier. Adults feed on leaves, flowers and fruit. Feeding damage to fruit reduces quality. Females oviposit into young fruit, causing surface blemishes and resulting in distortion as the fruit develops. Marketability is subsequently reduced. Larvae and pupae develop within host fruit. Most infested fruit fall prematurely, reducing yield. A. quadrigibbus was regarded as a more serious pest in the early 20th century. A. quadrigibbus is not known to occur in the EU and is listed in Annex IIAI of Council Directive 2000/29/EC under the synonym Tachypterellus quadrigibbus. Host plants for planting and infested fruit could potentially provide a pathway into the EU. Considering the climatic similarities between North America and Europe, and that wild and commercial hosts occur widely within the EU, A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spiders of Prince Edward Island: Experts and Citizen Scientists Collaborate for Faunistics
    The spiders of Prince Edward Island: experts and citizen scientists collaborate for faunistics JosEPh J. B owdEn 1, * , K ylE M. K nysh 2, G ErGIn A. B lAGoEv 3, r oBB BEnnETT 4, M ArK A. ArsEnAulT 5, CAlEB F. h ArdInG 2, r oBErT w. h ArdInG 6, and rosEMAry CurlEy 6 1Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, P.O. Box 960, Corner Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador A2H 6J3 Canada 2University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 4P3 Canada 3Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 579 Gordon Street, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 Canada 4Royal British Columbia Museum, 675 Belleville Street, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 9W2 Canada 5Prince Edward Island Department of Community, Lands and Environment, P.O. Box 2000, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 7N8 Canada 6Nature PEI, P.O. Box 2346, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 8C1 Canada *Corresponding author: [email protected] Bowden, J.J., K.M. Knysh, G.A. Blagoev, R. Bennett, M.A. Arsenault, C.F. Harding, R.W. Harding, and R. Curley. 2018. The spiders of Prince Edward Island: experts and citizen scientists collaborate for faunistics. Canadian Field-Naturalist 132(4): 330 –349. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v132i4.2017 Abstract Although lists of spider species have been compiled for all of Canada’s provinces and territories, the spider fauna of Prince Edward Island (PEI) is poorly known. Based on the efforts of citizen scientists, naturalists, and scientists on PEI and researchers at the Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, we present the first comprehensive list of spider species on the island, increasing the known number from 44 to 198.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae) of the Prairies Ecozone in Canada
    143 Chapter 4 Weevils (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae) of the Prairies Ecozone in Canada Robert S. Anderson Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1P 6P4 Email: [email protected] Patrice Bouchard* Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 Email: [email protected] *corresponding author Hume Douglas Entomology, Ottawa Plant Laboratories, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Building 18, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0C6 Email: [email protected] Abstract. Weevils are a diverse group of plant-feeding beetles and occur in most terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. This chapter documents the diversity and distribution of 295 weevil species found in the Canadian Prairies Ecozone belonging to the families Dryophthoridae (9 spp.), Brachyceridae (13 spp.), and Curculionidae (273 spp.). Weevils in the Prairies Ecozone represent approximately 34% of the total number of weevil species found in Canada. Notable species with distributions restricted to the Prairies Ecozone, usually occurring in one or two provinces, are candidates for potentially rare or endangered status. Résumé. Les charançons forment un groupe diversifié de coléoptères phytophages et sont présents dans la plupart des écosystèmes terrestres et dulcicoles. Le présent chapitre décrit la diversité et la répartition de 295 espèces de charançons vivant dans l’écozone des prairies qui appartiennent aux familles suivantes : Dryophthoridae (9 spp.), Brachyceridae (13 spp.) et Curculionidae (273 spp.). Les charançons de cette écozone représentent environ 34 % du total des espèces de ce groupe présentes au Canada. Certaines espèces notables, qui ne se trouvent que dans cette écozone — habituellement dans une ou deux provinces — mériteraient d’être désignées rares ou en danger de disparition.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnida: Araneae) of the Canadian Prairies
    75 Chapter 4 Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of the Canadian Prairies Héctor Cárcamo Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB Jaime Pinzón Department of Renewable Resources, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton Robin Leech 10534, 139 St NW, Edmonton AB John Spence Department of Renewable Resources, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton Abstract. Spiders are the seventh most diverse order of arthropods globally and are prominent predators in all prairie habitats. In this chapter, a checklist for the spiders of the Prairie Provinces (767 recorded species and 44 possible species) is presented along with an overview of all 26 families that occur in the region. Eighteen of the species from the region are adventive. Linyphiidae is by far the dominant family, representing 39% of all species in the three provinces. Gnaphosidae and Lycosidae each represent 8% and three other families (Salticidae, Dictynidae, and Theridiidae) each account for 7%. A summary of biodiversity studies conducted in the Prairies Ecozone and from transition ecoregions is also provided. The Mixed Grassland Ecoregion has the most distinctive assemblage; Schizocosa mccooki and Zelotes lasalanus are common only in this ecoregion. Other ecoregions appear to harbour less distinctive assemblages, but most have been poorly studied. Lack of professional opportunities for spider systematists in Canada remains a major barrier to the advancement of the taxonomy and ecology of spiders. Résumé. Les aranéides forment le septième ordre le plus diversifi é d’arthropodes dans le monde; ce sont des prédateurs très présents dans tous les habitats des Prairies.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropod Community Associated with the Webs of the Subsocial Spider Anelosimus Studiosus
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Fall 2008 Anthropod Community Associated with the Webs of the Subsocial Spider Anelosimus Studiosus Sarah Natalie Mock Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Recommended Citation Mock, Sarah Natalie, "Anthropod Community Associated with the Webs of the Subsocial Spider Anelosimus Studiosus" (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 702. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/702 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE WEBS OF THE SUBSOCIAL SPIDER ANELOSIMUS STUDIOSUS by SARAH N. MOCK (Under the Direction of Alan Harvey) ABSTRACT Anelosimus studiosus (Theridiidae) is a subsocial spider that has a diverse arthropod fauna associated with its webs. From south Georgia, I identified 1006 arthropods representing 105 species living with A. studiosus , and 40 species that were prey items from 250 webs. The arthropods seen in A. studiosus webs represented a distinct community from the arthropods on the tree. I found that Barronopsis barrowsi (Agelenidae) and Frontinella pyramitela was similar to A. studiosus in web structure and that B. barrowsi webs contained multiple arthropods. Also, previously known as asocial, B. barrowsi demonstrated sociality in having multiple adults per web. Lastly, the inquiline communities in the webs of A.studiosus and B.barronopsis contained many different feeding guilds, including herbivores, omnivores, generalist predators, kleptoparasites, and aranievores.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Literature Relevant to the Monitoring of Regulated Plant Health Pests in Europe
    13_EWG_ISPM6_2015_Sep Agenda item 4.2 Appendix C to Supporting Publications 2014-EN-676 Appendix C to the final report on: Plant health surveys for the EU territory: an analysis of data quality and methodologies and the resulting uncertainties for pest risk assessment (PERSEUS) CFP/EFSA/PLH/2010/01 available online at http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/doc/676e.pdf A Review of the Literature Relevant to the Monitoring of Regulated Plant Health Pests in Europe Work Package 1. November 2013 Howard Bell1, Maureen Wakefield1, Roy Macarthur1, Jonathan Stein1, Debbie Collins1, Andy Hart1, Alain Roques2, Sylvie Augustin2, Annie Yart2, Christelle Péré2, Gritta Schrader3, Claudia Wendt3, Andrea Battisti4, Massimo Faccoli4, Lorenzo Marini4, Edoardo Petrucco Toffolo4 1 The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, York, UK 2 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Avenue de la Pomme de Pin, Orléans, France 3 Julius Kühn-Institut, 27 Erwin-Baur-Str, Quedlinburg, Germany 4 Universita Degli Studi di Padova (UPAD), Via 8 Febbraio 1848 No. 2, 35100, Padova, Italy DISCLAIMER The present document has been produced and adopted by the bodies identified above as author(s). In accordance with Article 36 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, this task has been carried out exclusively by the author(s) in the context of a grant agreement between the European Food Safety Authority and the author(s). The present document is published complying with the transparency principle to which the Authority is subject. It cannot be considered as an output adopted by the Authority. The European Food Safety Authority reserves its rights, view and position as regards the issues addressed and the conclusions reached in the present document, without prejudice to the rights of the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Maine Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae)
    A CHECKLIST OF MAINE SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) By Daniel T. Jennings Charlene P. Donahue Forest Health and Monitoring Maine Forest Service Technical Report No. 47 MAINE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION AND FORESTRY September 2020 Augusta, Maine Online version of this report available from: https://www.maine.gov/dacf/mfs/publications/fhm_pubs.htm Requests for copies should be made to: Maine Forest Service Division of Forest Health & Monitoring 168 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0168 Phone: (207) 287-2431 Printed under appropriation number: 013-01A-2FHM-52 Issued 09/2020 Initial printing of 25 This product was made possible in part by funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest health programs in the Maine Forest Service, Department of Agriculture Conservation and Forestry are supported and conducted in partnership with the USDA, the University of Maine, cooperating landowners, resource managers, and citizen volunteers. This institution is prohibited from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. 2 A CHECKLIST OF MAINE SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) 1 2 DANIEL T. JENNINGS and CHARLENE P. DONAHUE ____________________________________ 1 Daniel T. Jennings, retired, USDA, Forest Service, Northern Forest Experiment Station. Passed away September 14, 2020 2 Charlene P. Donahue, retired, Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry – Maine Forest Service. Corresponding Author [email protected] 4 Table of Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Figure 1. Map of State of Maine
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Korea
    Technical information which needs to be provided to the UK NPPO before 01/01/21 The following information needs to be provided by third countries exporting to the UK, it must be submitted before 01 January 2021. Please chose one of the following option when completing the table: y = information communicated to United Kingdom x = information not provided n/a = not applicable Name of country submitting the information: The Republic of Korea Table 1: Please refer to Annex 7 part A of the Plant Health (Phytosanitary Conditions) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 when completing these tables Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire Plant species 50 – pest free Date of latest Review areas communication 50 Plants, other than fruit and Fraxinus L n/a January 7, 2021 seeds, of Fraxinus L., Juglans Juglans ailantifolia Carrière. n/a January 7, 2021 ailantifolia Juglans mandshurica n/a January 7, 2021 Carrière., Juglans mandshurica Maximowicz. Maximowicz., Ulmus davidiana Ulmus davidiana Planchon n/a January 7, 2021 Planchon. and Pterocarya Pterocarya rhoifolia Siebold & n/a January 7, 2021 rhoifolia Zuccarini. Siebold & Zuccarini. originating in Belarus, Canada, China, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Japan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, the Republic of Korea, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine and the USA Note: Fraxinus sp., Juglans sp. and Ulmus sp. are prohbited under Annex 6 part B of Plant Health (Phytosanitary Conditions) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 Botryosphaeria kuwatsukai (Hara) G.Y. Sun and E. Tanaka Plant species 97 (a) –country 97 (b) – pest 97 (c) - pest 97 (d) - Date of latest freedom free areas free place of systems communication / production approach Review 97 Fruits of Malus Mill., Pyrus L.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 14(2): 1 1 1-206
    2005. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 14(2): 1 1 1-206 THE SPIDER SPECIES OF THE GREAT LAKES STATES 1 2 3 4 Petra Sierwald , Michael L. Draney , Thomas Prentice , Frank Pascoe , Nina 1 5 2 1 Sandlin , Elizabeth M. Lehman , Vicki Medland , and James Louderman : 'Zoology, The Field Museum, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605; 2Department of Natural and Applied Sciences and Cofrin Center for Biodiversity, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, 2420 Nicolet Drive, Green Bay, Wisconsin 3 5431 1; Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521; 4Biology, College of St. Francis, 500 Wilcox Street, Joliet, Illinois 60435: 5 Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 ABSTRACT. Critical analysis of existing spider species lists for Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio. Indiana and Illinois reveals 900 species recorded from the five-state region (284 genera, 40 families). All non- native, Palearctic, or otherwise questionable species records were scrutinized, and their status is discussed. The most speciose families in the region are the Linyphiidae (almost 24% of species), Salticidae (10.3%), Theridiidae (8.9%), Lycosidae (8.8%), and Araneidae (7.7%). All sources used for spider species names and species records are unambiguously quoted. Spider species records are presented in tables allowing comparison of family composition among the states, and prediction of number of heretofore unrecorded species. Richness among states is analyzed and found to be dependent on varying degrees of sampling effort. As a new tool, a Spider Species Name Concordance Table allows tracking previously published spider species names to the currently valid name of every species record.
    [Show full text]