RESILIENT HURRICANE RECOVERY PLANNING PRACTICES Tai Harley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RESILIENT HURRICANE RECOVERY PLANNING PRACTICES Tai Harley THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS: RESILIENT HURRICANE RECOVERY PLANNING PRACTICES Tai Harley A capstone thesis paper submitted to the Executive Director of the Urban & Regional Planning Program at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Masters of Professional Studies in Urban & Regional Planning. Faculty Advisor: Scott Davis Academic Advisor: Uwe S. Brandes © Copyright 2018 by Tai Harley All Rights Reserved 2 ABSTRACT This thesis paper explores new urban planning practices for resilient recovery of the United States Virgin Islands on the basis of lessons learned from the 2017 hurricanes Irma and Maria. The findings of this research highlight how climate change requires the US Virgin Islands to forge new practices for efficient resilient planning and development. Without effective rebuilding practices, every future hurricane season will pose as a threat on the US Virgin Island’s economy and residents’ welfare. This paper argues that resilient planning initiatives can reduce the disruption of tourism revenue due to loss of infrastructure, telecommunications, and electricity. KEYWORDS United States Virgin Islands, Hurricane, Disaster Preparedness, Climate Change, Resilient Urban Planning, Sustainability, Tourism, Infrastructure, Building Codes 3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS Research question #1 What are the lessons learned from the recent hurricanes Irma and Maria? Research question #2 What are the current best practices for resilience planning in the United States Virgin Islands? Research question #3? Have current best practices incorporated the full spectrum of lessons- learned from recent hurricanes? 4 DEDICATION To my family, friends, and residents of the United States Virgin Islands (my hometown). This thesis paper is dedicated to the recovery efforts of hurricanes Irma and Maria that has forever changed the way of life, for better or for worst. As the territory rebuilds a resilient community, I present my paper as a guide for sustainable practices that can ensure recovery efforts are not misguided, effective, and are of the highest standards. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am overwhelmed with joy that my decision to invest in myself by advancing my professional attributes has become the pillar to true fulfillment and happiness. I am honored and humbled to be a part of Georgetown University’s Urban & Regional Program, and to now be a part of the urban planning fabric of this dynamic city I live in, Washington, DC. I owe tremendous love and gratitude to my parental units: Cheryl & Dennis Chance & John and Lorna Harley. Thank you for instilling perseverance, confidence, strength, and a passion for education throughout my entire life. I am a reflection of your love, and I am forever thankful for having you throughout this existence. To my support system that has encouraged, advised, supported, and pushed me to be my best self when I doubted my own abilities, I thank you tremendously: Jackie George, Jacques Harley, Chere Harley, Cadilla George, Tischer Lockhart-Burrows, Dr. J’Ana Brady, Alana Abednego, and Bernita Boxill. To Shanika DeWindt, I am forever grateful for that day you informed me of the information session for Georgetown University’s Urban & Regional Planning Program. I attended the information session because of you, and it has forever changed the course of my life. Huge thanks Shani!!! I am thankful for learning from ALL my professors throughout this program! Your professionalism, expertise, and passion for the urban planning discipline has inspired my own passion and has given me guidance on how to successfully navigate my career in this field. To my advisor for this project Scott Davis: thank you for helping me see the full potential of my vision. I am appreciative of your time and expertise which has been a tremendous component in completing this project. Thank you to all my classmates that were in the trenches with me over these past two years completing group projects, studying for finals, and completing homework assignments. We did it! We made it! Finally, to Georgetown University: thank you for selecting me and giving me this opportunity for my professional advancement. I am forever thankful for being a part of this prestigious institution. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract and Keywords ....................................................................................................................2 Research Questions .........................................................................................................................3 Dedication ........................................................................................................................................4 Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................................5 Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................6 List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................7 List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................9 Chapter One: Literature Review ....................................................................................................13 The Rise of Climate Change ..............................................................................................13 Lessons Learned from Past Storms ...................................................................................14 Disaster Preparedness and Risk Management ..................................................................17 Resilient Planning Practices ..............................................................................................18 100 Rockefeller Resilient Cities Program .........................................................................19 Chapter Two: Professional Best Practice Review .........................................................................21 Case Study: Bermuda ........................................................................................................21 Bermuda Building Code ....................................................................................................23 Bermuda Image: The Bermuda Roof .................................................................................25 Chapter Three: Research Methodology .........................................................................................29 Methodology .....................................................................................................................29 Literature Review/Primary Data/Secondary Sources .......................................................29 Chapter Four: Research Findings and Analysis .............................................................................31 Hurricane Marilyn September 1995 ..................................................................................31 Hurricane Irma September 2017 .......................................................................................35 Hurricane Maria September 2017 .....................................................................................38 Chapter Five: Thesis Articulation ..................................................................................................42 United States Virgin Islands First-Year Progress Report (Irma & Maria) .......................42 USVI Hurricane Recovery and Resilience Task Force Report 2018 .................................46 Resilient Urban Planning Recommendations ....................................................................47 Chapter Six: Conclusion ................................................................................................................48 Appendix: Interview with Beverly Nicholson-Doty, Commissioner of Tourism ..........................49 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................51 7 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.7: Cement Boards Windspeed Criteria ….……………………………………………...28 Table 4.5: Highest Hurricanes Wind Speed Comparison ……………………………………….36 Table 4.13: Mainland United States Tropical Cyclones Causing at Least 1 Billion Dollars in Damage, 1990-2017(Not Adjusted for Inflation) ……………………………………………….41 Table 5.1: Household Income Distribution for the USVI and United States……………………43 Table 5.3: Future Climate Hazards in the US Virgin Islands……………………………………46 8 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Puerto Rico Shocks and Stresses…………………………………………………… 20 Figure 2.1: Property Damage of Hurricane Fabian in Bermuda…………………………………22 Figure 2.2: Horizontal Support to Masonry Buildings…………………………………………..24 Figure 2.3: Reinforced Concrete/Connecting Walls……………………………………………..25 Figure 2.4: EPS Bermuda Profile Roof………………………………………………………….26 Figure 2.5: EPS Bermuda Profile Roof………………………………………………………….27 Figure 2.6: EPS Bermuda Roof Installation……………………………………………………..27 Figure 4.1: Best Track Positions for Hurricane Marilyn………………………………………...32 Figure 4.2: Hurricane Marilyn Devastation……………………………………………………...33 Figure 4.3: Hurricane Marilyn Devastation……………………………………………………...33 Figure 4.4: Hurricane Marilyn Devastation……………………………………………………...34
Recommended publications
  • 2014 North Atlantic Hurricane Season Review
    2014 North Atlantic Hurricane Season Review WHITEPAPER Executive Summary The 2014 Atlantic hurricane season was a quiet season, closing with eight 2014 marks the named storms, six hurricanes, and two major hurricanes (Category 3 or longest period on stronger). record – nine Forecast groups predicted that the formation of El Niño and below consecutive years average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the Atlantic Main – that no major Development Region (MDR)1 through the season would inhibit hurricanes made development in 2014, leading to a below average season. While 2014 landfall over the was indeed quiet, these predictions didn’t materialize. U.S. The scientific community has attributed the low activity in 2014 to a number of oceanic and atmospheric conditions, predominantly anomalously low Atlantic mid-level moisture, anomalously high tropical Atlantic subsidence (sinking air) in the Main Development Region (MDR), and strong wind shear across the Caribbean. Tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic basin was also influenced by below average activity in the 2014 West African monsoon season, which suppressed the development of African easterly winds. The year 2014 marks the longest period on record – nine consecutive years since Hurricane Wilma in 2005 – that no major hurricanes made landfall over the U.S., and also the ninth consecutive year that no hurricane made landfall over the coastline of Florida. The U.S. experienced only one landfalling hurricane in 2014, Hurricane Arthur. Arthur made landfall over the Outer Banks of North Carolina as a Category 2 hurricane on July 4, causing minor damage. While Mexico and Central America were impacted by two landfalling storms and the Caribbean by three, Bermuda suffered the most substantial damage due to landfalling storms in 2014.Hurricane Fay and Major Hurricane Gonzalo made landfall on the island within a week of each other, on October 12 and October 18, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Global Tropical Cyclone Wind Footprints
    https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-207 Preprint. Discussion started: 2 July 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Modelling Global Tropical Cyclone Wind Footprints James M. Done1,2, Ming Ge1, Greg J. Holland1,2, Ioana Dima-West3, Samuel Phibbs3, Geoffrey R. Saville3, and Yuqing Wang4 5 1National Center for Atmospheric Research, 3090 Center Green Drive, Boulder CO 80301, US 2Willis Research Network, 51 Lime St, London, EC3M 7DQ, UK 3Willis Towers Watson, 51 Lime St, London, EC3M 7DQ, UK 4International Pacific Research Center and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, HI 96822, US. 10 Correspondence to: James M. Done ([email protected]) Abstract. A novel approach to modelling the surface wind field of landfalling tropical cyclones (TCs) is presented. The modelling system simulates the evolution of the low-level wind fields of landfalling TCs, accounting for terrain effects. A two- step process models the gradient-level wind field using a parametric wind field model fitted to TC track data, then brings the winds down to the surface using a full numerical boundary layer model. The physical wind response to variable surface drag 15 and terrain height produces substantial local modifications to the smooth wind field provided by the parametric wind profile model. For a set of U.S. historical landfalling TCs the simulated footprints compare favourably with surface station observations. The model is applicable from single event simulation to the generation of global catalogues. One application demonstrated here is the creation of a dataset of 714 global historical TC overland wind footprints.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazus Hurricane Wind for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
    Hazus Hurricane Wind for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands May 2021 Hazus Hurricane Wind for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. vi List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. viii Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................... x Section 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 1-1 Section 2. Adapting the Hazus Model for Caribbean Territories ........................................................ 2-1 2.1 A Need for Hazus following Hurricanes Irma and Maria.............................................................. 2-1 2.2 Leveraging Damage Inspections and Local Caribbean Conditions Data ................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Topographic Differences ....................................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.2 Differences in the Built Environment ................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.2.1 Residential
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspective
    kZ ­­_!% L , Ti Historical Perspective 2.1 Introduction CROSS REFERENCE Through the years, FEMA, other Federal agencies, State and For resources that augment local agencies, and other private groups have documented and the guidance and other evaluated the effects of coastal flood and wind events and the information in this Manual, performance of buildings located in coastal areas during those see the Residential Coastal Construction Web site events. These evaluations provide a historical perspective on the siting, design, and construction of buildings along the Atlantic, Pacific, Gulf of Mexico, and Great Lakes coasts. These studies provide a baseline against which the effects of later coastal flood events can be measured. Within this context, certain hurricanes, coastal storms, and other coastal flood events stand out as being especially important, either Hurricane categories reported because of the nature and extent of the damage they caused or in this Manual should be because of particular flaws they exposed in hazard identification, interpreted cautiously. Storm siting, design, construction, or maintenance practices. Many of categorization based on wind speed may differ from that these events—particularly those occurring since 1979—have been based on barometric pressure documented by FEMA in Flood Damage Assessment Reports, or storm surge. Also, storm Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT) reports, and effects vary geographically— Mitigation Assessment Team (MAT) reports. These reports only the area near the point of summarize investigations that FEMA conducts shortly after landfall will experience effects associated with the reported major disasters. Drawing on the combined resources of a Federal, storm category. State, local, and private sector partnership, a team of investigators COASTAL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL 2-1 2 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE is tasked with evaluating the performance of buildings and related infrastructure in response to the effects of natural and man-made hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • What Happened? Irma and Maria -- the Back-To-Back Category 5 Hurricanes of September 2017 in the US Virgin Islands
    What Happened? Irma and Maria -- the back-to-back Category 5 Hurricanes of September 2017 in the US Virgin Islands OCEAN AND COASTAL OBSERVING – VIRGIN ISLANDS, INC. (OCOVI) WWW.OCOVI.ORG Two weeks apart, hurricanes Irma (September 6th) and Maria (September 20th) followed paths that sandwiched the Virgin Islands. Both remained Category 5 storms as they transited the VI region. Irma set a record of ~ 3¼ days in Category 5. What makes our region particularly prone to tropical storms or hurricanes? Abundant warm ocean water, Temperature ≥ 80◦F (26.5◦C) --the ocean water’s heat provides the energy for convection which creates storms; Start-up moisture and spin from pre-existing systems (e.g., waves coming from the African continent); Favorable distance from the equator in order to maximize the spin (Latitude > 4◦ is necessary to maintain the necessary spin; the VI is located around 18◦ N); Remoteness from competing continental systems which can deplete atmospheric moisture; Remoteness from sources of wind shear; Wind shear disrupts Minimal land surface (less debilitating friction, less convection deprivation of moisture). columns Who are we? Where are we? Hurricanes since 1851 Significant quote Alexander Hamilton describing the 1772 hurricane on St. Croix in the Royal Danish American Gazette, August 31,1772: … Good God! what horror and destruction—it's impossible for me to describe—or you to form any idea of it…. A great part of the buildings throughout the Island are levelled to the ground—almost all the rest very much shattered—several persons killed and numbers utterly ruined …our harbour is entirely bare…”.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Damage Report & Dive Sector Needs Assessment Commonwealth of Dominica, Post Hurricane Maria Funded By
    Marine Damage Report & Dive Sector Needs Assessment Commonwealth of Dominica, Post Hurricane Maria Funded by OAS Consultant Arun Madisetti Independent Marine Biologist Needs Assessment for Commonwealth of Dominica Following Hurricane Maria Introduction The Commonwealth of Dominica is known for experiencing extreme weather conditions and earthquakes. The island lies within the hurricane belt and has been impacted by many hurricanes and tropical storms. The most damaging storms in recent years include Hurricane David in 1979, Hurricane Hugo in 1989, Hurricane Marilyn in 1995, Hurricane Lenny in 1999, and Tropical Storm Erika in 2015.2 On August 27, 2015, Tropical Storm Erika hit Dominica. Rainfall of approximately 38 centimeters was recorded in southern Dominica, but because of the peaked topography of the island, it is likely that even higher levels of rainfall occurred in the interior of Dominica due to Tropical Storm Erika. The large amount of rainfall over such a short period caused landslides and flash-floods which resulted in carnage throughout much of the country—the most severe of which was reported on the western and south-eastern coasts. Tragically, 31 people died as a result of the storm and many more were displaced or experienced property loss or damage. The total estimated damage from T.S. Erika in Dominica alone was $483 million USD. The extensive impact of Tropical Storm Erika on Dominica emphasized the significance of hazard preparedness and climate change risk management, particularly at the government level.2 Most recently, Hurricane Maria (Figure 1) struck Dominica the evening of September 18, 2017 and bisected the island from southeast to northwest (Figure 2) during a period of about 8 hours with sustained wind speeds of 160 miles per hour (mph) and wind gusts well in excess of 250 mph (Figure 3).
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2003
    1744 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 133 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2003 MILES B. LAWRENCE,LIXION A. AVILA,JOHN L. BEVEN,JAMES L. FRANKLIN,RICHARD J. PASCH, AND STACY R. STEWART Tropical Prediction Center, National Hurricane Center, NOAA/NWS, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 30 April 2004, in final form 8 November 2004) ABSTRACT The 2003 Atlantic hurricane season is described. The season was very active, with 16 tropical storms, 7 of which became hurricanes. There were 49 deaths directly attributed to this year’s tropical cyclones. 1. Introduction hurricane, and Isabel’s category-2 landfall on the Outer There were 16 named tropical cyclones of at least Banks of North Carolina brought hurricane conditions tropical storm strength in the Atlantic basin during to portions of North Carolina and Virginia and record 2003, 7 of which became hurricanes. Table 1 lists these flood levels to the upper Chesapeake Bay. Elsewhere, tropical storms and hurricanes, along with their dates, Erika made landfall on the northeastern Mexico’s Gulf maximum 1-min wind speeds, minimum central sea Coast as a category-1 hurricane, Fabian was the most level pressures, deaths, and U.S. damage. Figure 1 destructive hurricane to hit Bermuda in over 75 yr, and shows the “best tracks” of this season’s storms. Juan was the worst hurricane to hit Halifax, Nova The numbers of tropical storms and hurricanes dur- Scotia, in over 100 yr. ing 2003 are above the long-term (1944–2003) averages This season’s tropical cyclones took 49 lives in the of 10 named storms, of which 6 become hurricanes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Atlantic Hurricane Season
    NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER ANNUAL SUMMARY 2014 ATLANTIC HURRICANE SEASON Richard J. Pasch 1 May 2015 NASA MODIS VISIBLE IMAGE OF HURRICANE GONZALO AT 1745 UTC 16 OCTOBER 2014 ABSTRACT The 2014 Atlantic hurricane season was below average in several respects. Although the number of hurricanes, six, equaled the long-term average, there were two major hurricanes (category 3 or higher intensity on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) and eight named storms, compared to the long- term averages of three and 12, respectively. The NOAA Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) index, which is a measure of the strength and duration of (sub)tropical storms and hurricanes, was about 72% of the long-term median. Although most of the tropical cyclone activity occurred well east of the east coast of the United States, Hurricane Arthur made landfall on the North Carolina coast in July. Bermuda was hit by two hurricanes, Fay and Gonzalo, in less than a week’s time in October. 2014 Atlantic Hurricane Season 2 OVERVIEW Tropical cyclone activity was somewhat below average in the Atlantic basin during 2014. Eight tropical storms formed, of which six became hurricanes, and two intensified into major hurricanes. In comparison the long-term (1981-2010) averages are 12 named storms, 6 hurricanes, and 3 major hurricanes. The NOAA Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) index for 2014 was 72% of the long-term median. While most land areas were spared from tropical cyclones in 2014, Hurricane Arthur made landfall on the North Carolina coast, and Bermuda was struck by Hurricanes Fay and Gonzalo within a six-day period.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Season Briefing
    2007 Hurricane Season Briefing Dr. Mark Guishard Director, Bermuda Weather Service An Effective End-to-End Warning System Predict / monitor TC development/progress using best science available Produce / deliver timely and accurate warnings in well understood formats via different channels A receptive, prepared and resourceful community Background - Intensity Tropical Storm — winds 39-73 mph (34-63 kt) e.g. Karen, Oct. 2001 Category 1 Hurricane — winds 74-95 mph (64-82 kt) e.g. Florence, Sept. 2006, Emily, Sept. 1987 Category 2 Hurricane — winds 96-110 mph (83-95 kt) Category 3 Hurricane — winds 111-130 mph (96-113 kt) e.g. Fabian, Sept. 2003 Category 4 Hurricane — winds 131-155 mph (114-135 kt) Category 5 Hurricane — winds 156 mph and up (135+ kt) The Saffir-Simpson Scale Tropical Storm — winds 39-73 mph (34-63 kt) – e.g. Franklin, Harvey 2005 TS Franklin July 26 2005 Source: NOAA The Saffir-Simpson Scale Tropical Storm — winds 39-73 mph (34-63 kt) – e.g. Franklin, Harvey 2005 45 1016 TS Harvey, August 4 2005 40 1014 TS Harvey, August 4 2005 35 1012 30 1010 Speed 25 1008 Gust SLP 20 1006 15 1004 10 1002 5 1000 032355Z 040152Z 040355Z 040618Z 040707Z 040755Z 040824Z 040855Z 040942Z 041055Z 041155Z 041336Z 041455Z 041655Z 041855Z 042055Z 042255Z 040507Z Source: BWS The Saffir-Simpson Scale Category 1 Hurricane — winds 74-95 mph (64-82 kt) Hurricane Emily September 27 1987 Rapidly turned towards Bermuda and intensified to a Hurricane. Direct hit, with eye passing over the island. Tornadoes embedded: Widespread roof damage & power outages Source:Unisys.com Source: NOAA The Saffir-Simpson Scale Category 1 Hurricane — winds 74-95 mph (64-82 kt) Hurricane Florence September 11, 2006 Another recurving hurricane Very large wind field Evidence of tornado damage Bermuda Source: BWS The Saffir-Simpson Scale Category 2 Hurricane — winds 96-110 mph (83-95 kt) Category 3 Hurricane — winds 111-130 mph (96-113 kt) e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Forecasting of Tropical Cyclones Storm Surges at Meteo-France
    OPERATIONAL FORECASTING OF TROPICAL CYCLONES STORM SURGES AT METEO-FRANCE PIERRE DANIEL 1; BRUNO HAIE 2; XAVIER AUBAIL 3 1DPREVI/MAR, Météo-France 42 Av Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse Cedex, FRANCE e-mail: [email protected] 2Direction InterRégionale de la Réunion, Météo-France B.P. 4, 97491 – Sainte Clotilde Cedex, Réunion e-mail: [email protected] 3Direction InterRégionale de la Nouvelle Calédonie, Météo-France 1, rue Vincent Auriol, BP 151 – 98845 Nouméa Cedex, Nouvelle-Calédonie e-mail: [email protected] A depth-averaged, numerical storm-surge model has been developed and configured to provide a stand-alone system to forecast tropical cyclone storm-surges. The primary data requirement for modelling storm surges is accurate surface wind and atmospheric pressure fields, in particular in the vicinity of maximum winds. These fields are inferred from an analytical-empirical cyclone model which require only cyclone position, intensity and size. The model has been adapted to run on a personal computer in a few minutes. The storm-surge model was tested in hindcast mode on tropical cyclones which gave significant surges over the French overseas territories over the period 1975- 1990. The system has been operated since the 1990s in the French Antilles, New Caledonia, the French Polynesia and La Reunion. The model can be used in two different ways. In real-time mode as a tropical cyclone is approaching an island or in climatological mode: a cyclone climatology is used to prepare a data base of pre-computed surges. Keywords : storm surge, tropical cyclone, operational model 1. Introduction Strong winds, heavy rains and storm surges are the three dangerous effects of tropical cyclones.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations and Analyses of Upper Ocean Responses to Tropical Storms and Hurricanes in the Vicinity of Bermuda W
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, C08009, doi:10.1029/2007JC004358, 2008 Click Here for Full Article Observations and analyses of upper ocean responses to tropical storms and hurricanes in the vicinity of Bermuda W. J. Black1 and T. D. Dickey1 Received 6 June 2007; revised 10 December 2007; accepted 11 February 2008; published 6 August 2008. [1] A circular region within a radius of 400 km of Bermuda has been struck by 188 tropical storms or hurricanes from 1851 through 2005 and by 20 since 1995. Here we describe new direct and remote sensing observations and analyses of recent events near the Bermuda Testbed Mooring including Hurricane Fabian (2003), Tropical Storm Harvey (2005) and Hurricane Nate (2005). The most impressive upper ocean response of the recent events was produced by Hurricane Fabian when SST cooling exceeded 3.5°C, vertical mixing occurred to a depth of greater than 130 m, and upper ocean currents reached 100 cm sÀ1. Fabian also triggered an ocean color event visible in SeaWiFS satellite images. Related implications include improved estimates of the roles of tropical cyclones in driving meridional overturning circulation (MOC) and testing of hypotheses concerning warming of the tropical oceans which could cause more intense tropical storms and hurricanes. Citation: Black, W. J., and T. D. Dickey (2008), Observations and analyses of upper ocean responses to tropical storms and hurricanes in the vicinity of Bermuda, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C08009, doi:10.1029/2007JC004358. 1. Introduction infer wind speed, sea surface temperature, sea surface and wave height, and ocean color is proving to be extremely [2] Recent hurricane events such as those observed dur- valuable, but there are serious limitations such as restriction ing the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, and in particular to surface expressions, cloudiness, and measurement reso- Hurricane Katrina, have focused the attention of both the lution [e.g., Babin et al., 2004; Scharroo et al., 2005; Son et scientific community and society in general on the connec- al., 2006].
    [Show full text]
  • The CBLAST-Hurricane Program and the Next- Generation Fully Coupled Atmosphere–Wave–Ocean Models for Hurricane Research and Prediction by SHUYI S
    The CBLAST-Hurricane Program and the Next- Generation Fully Coupled Atmosphere–Wave–Ocean Models for Hurricane Research and Prediction BY SHUYI S. CHEN, JAMES F. PRICE, WEI ZHAO, MARK A. DONELAN, AND EDWARD J. WALSH he record-setting 2005 hurricane season has sphere–wave–ocean modeling system that is capable highlighted the urgent need for a better under- of resolving the eye and eyewall at ~1-km grid resolu- T standing of the factors that contribute to hurri- tion, which is consistent with a key recommendation cane intensity, and for the development of correspond- for the next-generation hurricane-prediction models ing advanced hurricane prediction models to improve by the NOAA Science Advisor Board Hurricane intensity forecasts. Th e lack of skill in present forecasts Intensity Research Working Group. It is also the Na- of hurricane intensity may be attributed, in part, to de- tional Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) fi ciencies in the current prediction models—insuffi cient plan for the new Hurricane Weather Research and grid resolution, inadequate surface and boundary-layer Forecasting (HWRF) model to be implemented op- formulations, and the lack of full coupling to a dynamic erationally in 2007–08. ocean. Th e extreme high winds, intense rainfall, large ocean waves, and copious sea spray in hurricanes push AIR–SEA INTERACTION AND HURRI- the surface-exchange parameters for temperature, water CANES. Hurricanes rarely reach their maximum vapor, and momentum into untested regimes. potential intensity (MPI, as defi ned by Kerry Emanuel Th e Coupled Boundary Layer Air–Sea Transfer and Greg Holland). Many factors can prevent a given (CBLAST)-Hurricane program is aimed at develop- storm from reaching MPI, including environmental ing improved parameterizations using observations vertical wind shear, distribution of troposphere water from the CBLAST-Hurricane field program (de- vapor, hurricane internal dynamics, and air–sea in- scribed by Peter Black and colleagues elsewhere in teractions.
    [Show full text]