Pannotia to Pangaea: Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic Orogenic Cycles in the Circum-Atlantic Region: a Celebration of the Career of Damian Nance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pannotia to Pangaea: Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic Orogenic Cycles in the Circum-Atlantic Region: a Celebration of the Career of Damian Nance Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 Pannotia to Pangaea: Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic Orogenic Cycles in the Circum-Atlantic Region: A celebration of the career of Damian Nance J. Brendan Murphy1,2*, Robin A. Strachan3 and Cecilio Quesada4 1Department of Earth Sciences, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, B2G 2W5, Canada 2Earth Dynamics Research Group, the Institute for Geoscience Research (TIGeR), School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, WA 6845, Australia 3School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3QL, UK 4Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (IGME), C/Ríos Rosas, 23, 28003 Madrid, Spain JBM, 0000-0003-2269-1976 *Correspondence: [email protected] Special Publication 503 celebrates the career of between tectonic events and biogeochemical cycles, R. Damian Nance. It features 27 articles, with more as exemplified in the late Neoproterozoic–Early than 110 authors based in 18 different countries. Cambrian by the amalgamation of Gondwana span- The wide range of topics presented in this volume ning a time interval characterized by dramatic climate mirrors the breadth and depth of Damian’s contribu- swings, profound changes in the chemistry of the tions, interests and expertise. Like Damian’s papers, oceans and atmosphere, and the evolution of multi- the contributions range from the predominantly con- cellular animals (see Hoffman 1991; Hoffman et al. ceptual to detailed field work, but all are targeted at 1998; Narbonne 2010; Knoll 2013). understanding important tectonic processes. Their As reconstructions became more refined, scope not only varies in scale from global to regional several authors proposed that Gondwana was part to local, but also in the range of approaches required of a larger entity called Pannotia that included Lau- to gain that understanding. Thus, there are contribu- rentia, Baltica and possibly Siberia (e.g. Stump tions on the processes responsible for the formation 1987; Dalziel 1997). Recent syntheses have con- and breakup of supercontinents, the controversial tested the status of Pannotia as an Ediacaran super- amalgamation of Pannotia, the generation and continent because of its small size relative to destruction of Paleozoic oceans, and the development Pangaea (about half) and limited duration (it was of the Appalachian–Ouachitan–Caledonide–Varis- probably breaking up in its centre as continents can orogens (Fig. 1). In addition to field work, the were colliding with its margins). Rodinia, which approaches to gain that understanding include exam- amalgamated during global-scale c. 1.1–0.9 Ga oro- ining the relationships between stratigraphy and genesis, is arguably the most widely accepted of the structural geology, precise geochronology, geo- pre-Pangaean supercontinents (McMenamin and chemical and isotopic fingerprinting, geodynamic McMenamin 1990; Li et al. 2008). Many syntheses modelling, regional syntheses, palaeogeographic claim that the transition from Rodinia to Pangaea modelling, and plain, old-fashioned arm-waving! represents a single supercontinent cycle (e.g. Li et al. 2019). Resolution of the ‘Pannotia contro- versy’ is fundamental to understanding the supercon- The Pannotia controversy tinent cycle. If the transition from Rodinia to Pangaea represents a single supercontinent cycle, When Damian with Tom Worsley and Judith Moody then Pangaea probably formed by extroversion, i.e. proposed the existence of a supercontinent cycle with predominantlysubductionof the exterior oceansystem a series of papers in the 1980s (Nance et al. 1986; that surrounded Rodinia (Li et al. 2019). In contrast, Moody et al. 1988), the amalgamation of Gondwana Murphy and Nance (2008) maintain that Pannotia in the Neoproterozoic, as evidenced by the collisional formed by the amalgamation of the ocean exterior to Pan-African orogenic events, was arguably their best Rodinia (extroversion), but that Pangaea was formed defined pre-Pangaean supercontinent. These early from Pannotia by closure of the interior Iapetus and publications examined the potential relationship Rheic oceans (introversion). From: Murphy, J. B., Strachan, R. A. and Quesada, C. (eds) 2020. Pannotia to Pangaea: Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic Orogenic Cycles in the Circum-Atlantic Region. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 503, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP503-2020-213 © 2020 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Published by The Geological Society of London. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 J. B. Murphy et al. Gondwanan margin beginning at c. 0.6 Ga. Candi- dates for plume magmatism are identified that require testing by detailed field, geochemical and isotopic studies. Heron et al. (2020) present 3-D global convec- tion models showing increased core–mantle heat flux during the convergence that led to Pan-African collisions and amalgamation of Pannotia. This heat flux is similar in magnitude to that associated with convergence and assembly of Rodinia and Pangaea, implying that Pannotia assembly may have impacted mantle circulation patterns in a similar manner. Evans (2020) argues against the existence of Pannotia as a landmass, claiming that its existence is not supported by either the geological record or indirect proxies (e.g. biological diversity, palaeo- climate, sea-level, magmatism and palaeoenviron- mental indicators). Evans does agree with Murphy Fig. 1. Palaeocontinental reconstruction (c. 500 Ma; at al. and Heron et al. that the assembly of Gondwana after Domeier 2016) showing the relative locations of was probably a geodynamically significant event on the contributions to this volume. Events in many of the a global scale and merits the status of ‘semi- papers span a considerable duration of time, or may supercontinent’ (see Evans et al. 2016). deviate in time from c. 500 Ma so that the location et al. shown on this map is not necessarily intended to Kroner (2020) test the hypothesis of a provide a geological context for tectonic events Pannotian supercontinent by combining geological documented in the papers. Papers 1–4 (Murphy et al., and palaeogeographical constraints from different Heron et al., Evans and Kroner et al.) are global studies regions. They reconstruct the Paleozoic kinematics and their locations are not shown. 5, Hoffman; 6, van of Laurentia, Gondwana, Siberia and the peri- Staal et al.; 7, Arenas et al.; 8, Lindner et al.; 9, Errami Gondwanan terranes relative to the East European et al.; 10, Andresen; 11, Dalslåen et al.; 12, Slagstad Craton (including Baltica). Their approach is to et al.; 13, Walker et al.; 14, McConnell et al.; 15, ‘back-rotate’ from a Pangaea-A configuration to Archibald and Murphy; 16, Schofield et al.; 17, Dostal et al.; 18, Hildebrand and Whalen; 19, Piper and accommodate the Paleozoic opening of the Iapetus, Pe-Piper; 20, Park and Hinds; 21, Dennis, 22., Rheic and Paleo-Arctic oceans. These back rotations Juárez-Zúñiga et al.; 23, Álvaro et al.; 24, Sánchez achieve a Pannotia configuration, thus supporting Martinez et al.; 25, Gutiérrez-Alonso et al.; 26, their interpretation of its status as a supercontinent Paslawski et al.; 27, Pereira et al. Abbreviations: FA, and indicating that the transition from Rodinia to Pan- Famatina; MX, Mexico; CA, Carolinia; WA, West gaea represents two complete supercontinent cycles. Avalonia; EA, East Avalonia; IB, Iberia; AM, They also identify two fundamental phases of Iapetus Armorica; CH, Clew Bay-Highland Border; MV, Ocean opening and closure. Midland Valley–South Mayo; DW, Dashwoods; LB, Lushes Bight; PI, Eastern Piedmont; CU, Cuyania. Regional Neoproterozoic tectonics In this volume, four papers (Murphy et al., Heron et al., Evans and Kroner et al.) tackle the con- The Neoproterozoic Era was characterized by colli- troversial status of Pannotia as an Ediacaran super- sional (Pan-African) orogenic belts as Gondwana continent. Murphy et al. (2020) point out that an amalgamated, and by subduction-related orogenesis over-arching question is whether the assembly of along its periphery. In the Pan-African collisional the Gondwanan portion of Pannotia influenced belt of Namibia, Hoffman (2020) describes the global-scale mantle convection patterns (Nance and stratigraphic and structural record of a lithospheric Murphy 2019; Pastor-Galán et al. 2019). Such pat- cusp (or syntaxis). Such cusps (where arcs are terns, if they existed, must be factored into models joined end-to-end) are features of modern arc sys- for the amalgamation of Pangaea. Deducing the tems, associated with the buckling of subducted mantle legacy (mantle convection patterns) of Pan- slabs, but are rarely identified in the geological notia’s amalgamation is fundamental to resolving record. Hoffman describes a potential cusp where this controversy. Murphy et al. propose a testable sce- the Kaoko belt and the Damara orogen meet at nario involving feedback between the supercontinent right angles. In the vicinity of the hypothesized cycle and global mantle convection patterns. This cusp, the regional stratigraphy dominated by marine predicts upwellings beneath the Gondwanan portion carbonates was uplifted to form a megakarst land- of Pannotia and the arrival of plumes along the entire scape with associated mass slides and was then Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/
Recommended publications
  • Assembly, Configuration, and Break-Up History of Rodinia
    Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Precambrian Research 160 (2008) 179–210 Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis Z.X. Li a,g,∗, S.V. Bogdanova b, A.S. Collins c, A. Davidson d, B. De Waele a, R.E. Ernst e,f, I.C.W. Fitzsimons g, R.A. Fuck h, D.P. Gladkochub i, J. Jacobs j, K.E. Karlstrom k, S. Lu l, L.M. Natapov m, V. Pease n, S.A. Pisarevsky a, K. Thrane o, V. Vernikovsky p a Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia b Department of Geology, Lund University, Solvegatan 12, 223 62 Lund, Sweden c Continental Evolution Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia d Geological Survey of Canada (retired), 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0E8 e Ernst Geosciences, 43 Margrave Avenue, Ottawa, Canada K1T 3Y2 f Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton U., Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6 g Tectonics Special Research Centre, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia h Universidade de Bras´ılia, 70910-000 Bras´ılia, Brazil i Institute of the Earth’s Crust SB RAS, Lermontova Street, 128, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia j Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway k Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northrop Hall University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA l Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, CGS, No.
    [Show full text]
  • The North-Subducting Rheic Ocean During the Devonian: Consequences for the Rhenohercynian Ore Sites
    Published in "International Journal of Earth Sciences 106(7): 2279–2296, 2017" which should be cited to refer to this work. The north-subducting Rheic Ocean during the Devonian: consequences for the Rhenohercynian ore sites Jürgen F. von Raumer1 · Heinz-Dieter Nesbor2 · Gérard M. Stampfli3 Abstract Base metal mining in the Rhenohercynian Zone activated Early Devonian growth faults. Hydrothermal brines has a long history. Middle-Upper Devonian to Lower Car- equilibrated with the basement and overlying Middle-Upper boniferous sediment-hosted massive sulfide deposits Devonian detrital deposits forming the SHMS deposits in the (SHMS), volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits (VHMS) southern part of the Pyrite Belt, in the Rhenish Massif and and Lahn-Dill-type iron, and base metal ores occur at sev- in the Harz areas. Volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits eral sites in the Rhenohercynian Zone that stretches from the (VHMS) formed in the more eastern localities of the Rheno- South Portuguese Zone, through the Lizard area, the Rhen- hercynian domain. In contrast, since the Tournaisian period ish Massif and the Harz Mountain to the Moravo-Silesian of ore formation, dominant pull-apart triggered magmatic Zone of SW Bohemia. During Devonian to Early Carbonif- emplacement of acidic rocks, and their metasomatic replace- erous times, the Rhenohercynian Zone is seen as an evolv- ment in the apical zones of felsic domes and sediments in ing rift system developed on subsiding shelf areas of the the northern part of the Iberian Pyrite belt, thus changing the Old Red continent. A reappraisal of the geotectonic setting general conditions of ore precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Tectonic Evolution of the Acatlán Complex, Southern Mexico
    TECTONICS, VOL. 28, TC4008, doi:10.1029/2007TC002159, 2009 Click Here for Full Article Structural and tectonic evolution of the Acatla´n Complex, southern Mexico: Its role in the collisional history of Laurentia and Gondwana Ricardo Vega-Granillo,1 Thierry Calmus,2 Diana Meza-Figueroa,1 Joaquı´n Ruiz,3 Oscar Talavera-Mendoza,4 and Margarita Lo´pez-Martı´nez5 Received 24 May 2007; revised 22 January 2009; accepted 10 March 2009; published 25 July 2009. [1] Correlation of deformational phases and thermal opening. Citation: Vega-Granillo, R., T. Calmus, D. Meza- events in the Acatla´n Complex permits definition of Figueroa, J. Ruiz, O. Talavera-Mendoza, and M. Lo´pez-Martı´nez nine major tectonic events. Seven events are related to (2009), Structural and tectonic evolution of the Acatla´n Complex, the evolution of the Iapetus and Rheic oceans. By the southern Mexico: Its role in the collisional history of Laurentia Early Ordovician, the Xayacatla´n suite of Laurentian and Gondwana, Tectonics, 28, TC4008, doi:10.1029/ affinity was metamorphosed to eclogite facies and 2007TC002159. exhumed before colliding with the El Rodeo suite. From the Late Ordovician to Silurian, the Upper 1. Introduction Ordovician Ixcamilpa suite with peri-Gondwanan affinity was metamorphosed to blueschist facies, [2] The Acatla´n Complex basement of the Mixteco exhumed, and subsequently was overthrust by the terrane contains the largest exposure of eclogites, high-P Xayacatla´n–El Rodeo block. Part of the Esperanza garnet amphibolites, blueschists and eclogitized granitoids of Paleozoic age in Mexico. In a strict sense, the Mixteco suite is an Early Silurian intra-Iapetian continental arc terrane must be considered a superterrane composed of that collided with and subducted beneath continental thrust sheets containing Mesoproterozoic to Paleozoic pet- crust, generating a Silurian eclogitic event.
    [Show full text]
  • Proterozoic East Gondwana: Supercontinent Assembly and Breakup Geological Society Special Publications Society Book Editors R
    Proterozoic East Gondwana: Supercontinent Assembly and Breakup Geological Society Special Publications Society Book Editors R. J. PANKHURST (CHIEF EDITOR) P. DOYLE E J. GREGORY J. S. GRIFFITHS A. J. HARTLEY R. E. HOLDSWORTH A. C. MORTON N. S. ROBINS M. S. STOKER J. P. TURNER Special Publication reviewing procedures The Society makes every effort to ensure that the scientific and production quality of its books matches that of its journals. Since 1997, all book proposals have been refereed by specialist reviewers as well as by the Society's Books Editorial Committee. If the referees identify weaknesses in the proposal, these must be addressed before the proposal is accepted. Once the book is accepted, the Society has a team of Book Editors (listed above) who ensure that the volume editors follow strict guidelines on refereeing and quality control. We insist that individual papers can only be accepted after satis- factory review by two independent referees. The questions on the review forms are similar to those for Journal of the Geological Society. The referees' forms and comments must be available to the Society's Book Editors on request. Although many of the books result from meetings, the editors are expected to commission papers that were not pre- sented at the meeting to ensure that the book provides a balanced coverage of the subject. Being accepted for presentation at the meeting does not guarantee inclusion in the book. Geological Society Special Publications are included in the ISI Science Citation Index, but they do not have an impact factor, the latter being applicable only to journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkatach Hypothesis: a New Model for the Evolution of the Pacific, Tethyan, and Paleo-Asian Oceanic Domains
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Balkatach hypothesis: A new model for the evolution of the Pacific, Tethyan, and Paleo-Asian oceanic domains 1,2 2 GEOSPHERE, v. 13, no. 5 Andrew V. Zuza and An Yin 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA 2Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567, USA doi:10.1130/GES01463.1 18 figures; 2 tables; 1 supplemental file ABSTRACT suturing. (5) The closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean in the early Permian was accompanied by a widespread magmatic flare up, which may have been CORRESPONDENCE: avz5818@gmail .com; The Phanerozoic history of the Paleo-Asian, Tethyan, and Pacific oceanic related to the avalanche of the subducted oceanic slabs of the Paleo-Asian azuza@unr .edu domains is important for unraveling the tectonic evolution of the Eurasian Ocean across the 660 km phase boundary in the mantle. (6) The closure of the and Laurentian continents. The validity of existing models that account for Paleo-Tethys against the southern margin of Balkatach proceeded diachro- CITATION: Zuza, A.V., and Yin, A., 2017, Balkatach hypothesis: A new model for the evolution of the the development and closure of the Paleo-Asian and Tethyan Oceans criti- nously, from west to east, in the Triassic–Jurassic. Pacific, Tethyan, and Paleo-Asian oceanic domains: cally depends on the assumed initial configuration and relative positions of Geosphere, v. 13, no. 5, p. 1664–1712, doi:10.1130 the Precambrian cratons that separate the two oceanic domains, including /GES01463.1. the North China, Tarim, Karakum, Turan, and southern Baltica cratons.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping a Hidden Terrane Boundary in the Mantle Lithosphere with Lamprophyres
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06253-7 OPEN Mapping a hidden terrane boundary in the mantle lithosphere with lamprophyres Arjan H. Dijkstra 1 & Callum Hatch1,2 Lamprophyres represent hydrous alkaline mantle melts that are a unique source of information about the composition of continental lithosphere. Throughout southwest Britain, post-Variscan lamprophyres are (ultra)potassic with strong incompatible element enrich- 1234567890():,; ments. Here we show that they form two distinct groups in terms of their Sr and Nd isotopic compositions, occurring on either side of a postulated, hitherto unrecognized terrane boundary. Lamprophyres emplaced north of the boundary fall on the mantle array with εNd −1 to +1.6. Those south of the boundary are enriched in radiogenic Sr, have initial εNd values of −0.3 to −3.5, and are isotopically indistinguishable from similar-aged lamprophyres in Armorican massifs in Europe. We conclude that an Armorican terrane was juxtaposed against Avalonia well before the closure of the Variscan oceans and the formation of Pangea. The giant Cornubian Tin-Tungsten Ore Province and associated batholith can be accounted for by the fertility of Armorican lower crust and mantle lithosphere. 1 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK. 2 Department of Core Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD UK. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.H.D. (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2018) 9:3770 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06253-7 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06253-7 ilson’s cycle1 of the opening and closing of ocean typically form 10 cm to m-wide dykes and other types of minor Wbasins throughout Earth history was based on the intrusions cutting across Variscan foliations in Carboniferous and similarity of Early Palaeozoic faunal assemblages in Devonian rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic 3: Alabama in the Paleozoic
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA GY 112: Earth History Paleozoic 3: Alabama in the Paleozoic Instructor: Dr. Douglas W. Haywick Last Time The Paleozoic Part 2 1) Back to Newfoundland 2) Eastern Laurentian Orogenies (Appalachians) 3) Other Laurentian Orogenies (Antler, Ouachita) (web notes 25) Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Even though this coastline of Laurentia was a passive continental margin, a plate tectonic boundary was rapidly approaching… A B A B Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The resulting Taconic Orogeny first depressed the seafloor Laurentia (localized transgression) and A Island arc then pushed previously deposited passive continental B margin sediments up into thrust fault mountains. Baltica There was only minimal metamorphism and igneous A intrusions. B Middle Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Laurentia Baltica Middle Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Laurentia Baltica Middle Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The next tectonic event (the Acadian Orogeny) was caused Laurentia by the approach of Baltica A B Baltica A B Baltica Baltica Late Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The Acadian Orogeny was more extensive and more intense (metamorphism and A lots of igneous intrusions) B A B Early Devonian Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The Acadian Orogeny was more extensive and more intense (metamorphism and lots of igneous intrusions) Early Devonian Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Lastly, along comes Gondwanna and…. …well you get the idea. A B B A B Mississippian Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Lastly, along comes Gondwanna and…. …well you get the idea. A B B A B Pennsylvannian Suture zone Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Lastly, along comes Gondwanna and…. …well you get the idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Suprasubduction Zone Setting for the Youngest Rheic Ocean Floor
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by EPrints Complutense Care6n ophiolite, NW Spain: Suprasubduction zone setting for the youngest Rheic Ocean floor Sonia Sanchez Martfnez "" Departamento de Petrologla y Geoqulmlca, Unlversldad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain R·Icar d 0 Arenas } Florentino Dfaz Garcfa Departamento de Geologia, Unlversldad de OVledo, 33005 OVledo, Spain Jose Ram6n Martfnez Catalan Departamento de Geologia, Unlversldad de Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain Juan G6mez-Barreiro Department of Earth & Planetary SCiences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA Julian A. Pearce School of Earth, Ocean and Planetary SCiences, Cardiff University, CFto 3YE Cardiff, UK ABSTRACT included in the GSA Data Repository.l The The Careon ophiolite (Galicia, NW Iberian MassiO shows lithological and geochemical geochemical features of these samples (Fig. 2; features suggestive of an origin in a suprasubduction zone setting. As with other Devonian Fig. DRI [see footnote I]) show that most of the ophiolites in the European Variscan belt, it was generated within a contracting Rheic Ocean. studied metabasites have compositions equiva­ This setting and the general absence of large Silurian-Devonian volcanic arcs on both of the lent to tholeiitic basalts (Fig. DRIA). Average Rheic Ocean margins strongly suggest that this ocean was closed by intraoceanic subduction rare earth element (REE) contents (Rg. DRl B) directed to the north. This subduction removed the older normal (N) mid-oceanic-ridge basalt of most rock types have concentrations around (MORB) oceanic lithosphere and gave rise to a limited volume of new suprasubduction zone ten times the chondrite abundances and ahnost oceanic lithosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making and Unmaking of a Supercontinent: Rodinia Revisited
    Tectonophysics 375 (2003) 261–288 www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto The making and unmaking of a supercontinent: Rodinia revisited Joseph G. Meerta,*, Trond H. Torsvikb a Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, 241 Williamson Hall, PO Box 11210 Gainesville, FL 32611, USA b Academy of Sciences (VISTA), c/o Geodynamics Center, Geological Survey of Norway, Leif Eirikssons vei 39, Trondheim 7491, Norway Received 11 April 2002; received in revised form 7 January 2003; accepted 5 June 2003 Abstract During the Neoproterozoic, a supercontinent commonly referred to as Rodinia, supposedly formed at ca. 1100 Ma and broke apart at around 800–700 Ma. However, continental fits (e.g., Laurentia vs. Australia–Antarctica, Greater India vs. Australia– Antarctica, Amazonian craton [AC] vs. Laurentia, etc.) and the timing of break-up as postulated in a number of influential papers in the early–mid-1990s are at odds with palaeomagnetic data. The new data necessitate an entirely different fit of East Gondwana elements and western Gondwana and call into question the validity of SWEAT, AUSWUS models and other variants. At the same time, the geologic record indicates that Neoproterozoic and early Paleozoic rift margins surrounded Laurentia, while similar-aged collisional belts dissected Gondwana. Collectively, these geologic observations indicate the breakup of one supercontinent followed rapidly by the assembly of another smaller supercontinent (Gondwana). At issue, and what we outline in this paper, is the difficulty in determining the exact geometry of the earlier supercontinent. We discuss the various models that have been proposed and highlight key areas of contention. These include the relationships between the various ‘external’ Rodinian cratons to Laurentia (e.g., Baltica, Siberia and Amazonia), the notion of true polar wander (TPW), the lack of reliable paleomagnetic data and the enigmatic interpretations of the geologic data.
    [Show full text]
  • (Acadian) Orogenic Events in Scotland John R Mendum British Geological Survey, Edinburgh
    Late Caledonian (Scandian) and Proto-Variscan (Acadian) orogenic events in Scotland John R Mendum British Geological Survey, Edinburgh Abstract The later tectonic phases of the Caledonian Orogeny reflect the collision of Baltica and Laurentia. The result was the Scandian event in Silurian times, and the oblique docking of Eastern Avalonia with Scotland, generating deformation and metamorphism in the Southern Uplands. The exhumation of the Caledonide Orogen was then accompanied by sinistral transtensional faulting and emplacement of granitoid plutons. The Iapetus Ocean was finally closed, and subduction activity had migrated south to the Rheic Ocean by early Devonian times. Continental rifting and deposition of the Lower Old Red Sandstone fluvial-lacustrine succession, accompanied by basaltic-andesitic volcanism, occurred across Scotland. Deposition commenced in the late Silurian and continued through to Emsian times, when it was interrupted by the short-lived, northward-directed Acadian event. The resultant deformation and folding, a product of sinistral transpression, were focussed along the major pre-existing faults and shear zones. Evidence for Acadian transpressional movements along the Great Glen Fault (GGF) is found near Rosemarkie, where Moine psammites and semipelites are interleaved with Lewisianoid gneisses in a structural inlier. These lithologies are intruded by pink leucogranite veins that themselves show evidence of two phases of ductile deformation and folding. U-Pb monazite and zircon ages show that the leucogranites were emplaced at c. 399 Ma. Leucogranite intrusion and subsequent deformation are interpreted to have occurred during oblique extrusion of the inlier as an elongate ‘pip’, generated at a northwestward step-over that developed on the GGF during the Acadian Event.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth History
    Earth History Geography 106 LRS Doug Fischer Introduction – Overview of geologic history • Plate positions over time • Major biogeographic events Earth’s tectonic history • Gondwanaland – Southern continents – Formed 650mya Precambrian • Laurasia – Northern Continents – Most converged in Devonian 400mya as “old sandstone continent” • Formation of Pangaea – Late Permian ~ 275 mya Breakup of Pangaea • Started 180 mya (early Jurassic) – Prior to breakup, great mixing of biota – However, regionalization did still occur as it does on (smaller) continents today Breakup of Laurasia • Separated Europe & N. America 100 mya • Beringia rejoined them 75 mya • Intermittent connection via Greenland & Beringia through Tertiary Breakup of Gondwanaland • 180-160mya Gondwanaland started to split – Mesozoic (Triassic/Jurassic) • Mostly finished by 90 mya 152 mya 94 mya Central America and Antilles • Caribbean Plate was sandwiched between N&S America between 80 and 20 mya • Formed ring of islands • Landbridge closed ~ 3.5 mya – Great American Interchange 14 mya Biogeographic consequences of plate tectonics • Fragmentation and dispersal of ancestral biota (vicariance) • Changing barriers and coridors – biotic interchange • Speciation and extinction – changing physical and biological conditions Tour of Geologic History The geologic time scale • Phanerozoic starts with Cambrian explosion of species with hard body parts – (Some multi- cellular algae and animals lived at the end of the Precambrian) Paleozoic Paleozoic Cambrian • Animals with hard-shells appeared in great numbers for the first time • The continents were flooded by shallow seas. • The supercontinent of Gondwana had just formed and was located near the South Pole. Ordivician • ancient oceans separated the barren continents of Laurentia, Baltica, Siberia and Gondwana. • The end of the Ordovician was one of the coldest times in Earth history.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Pangea B and the Late Paleozoic Ice Age ⁎ D.V. Kenta,b, ,G.Muttonic a Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA b Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA c Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra 'Ardito Desio', Università degli Studi di Milano, via Mangiagalli 34, I-20133 Milan, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Editor: Thomas Algeo The Late Paleozoic Ice Age (LPIA) was the penultimate major glaciation of the Phanerozoic. Published compi- Keywords: lations indicate it occurred in two main phases, one centered in the Late Carboniferous (~315 Ma) and the other Late Paleozoic Ice Age in the Early Permian (~295 Ma), before waning over the rest of the Early Permian and into the Middle Permian Pangea A (~290 Ma to 275 Ma), and culminating with the final demise of Alpine-style ice sheets in eastern Australia in the Pangea B Late Permian (~260 to 255 Ma). Recent global climate modeling has drawn attention to silicate weathering CO2 Greater Variscan orogen consumption of an initially high Greater Variscan edifice residing within a static Pangea A configuration as the Equatorial humid belt leading cause of reduction of atmospheric CO2 concentrations below glaciation thresholds. Here we show that Silicate weathering CO2 consumption the best available and least-biased paleomagnetic reference poles place the collision between Laurasia and Organic carbon burial Gondwana that produced the Greater Variscan orogen in a more dynamic position within a Pangea B config- uration that had about 30% more continental area in the prime equatorial humid belt for weathering and which drifted northward into the tropical arid belt as it transformed to Pangea A by the Late Permian.
    [Show full text]