Daim, Kasitah Angkat Sumpah Jawatan Menteri (BH 27/06/1998)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Daim, Kasitah Angkat Sumpah Jawatan Menteri (BH 27/06/1998)

27/06/1998 Daim, Kasitah angkat sumpah jawatan menteri KUALA LUMPUR, Jumaat - Penasihat Ekonomi Kerajaan, Tun Daim Zainuddin, mengangkat sumpah jawatan Menteri Tugas-Tugas Khas di Jabatan Perdana Menteri di hadapan Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Tuanku Ja'afar, di Istana Negara, hari ini. Turut mengangkat sumpah ialah Tan Sri Kasitah Gaddam, yang dilantik menganggotai semula Kabinet sebagai Menteri Tanah dan Pembangunan Koperasi. Antara yang hadir pada upacara itu ialah Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad dan timbalannya, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Hadir sama ialah Menteri Pengangkutan, Datuk Seri Dr Ling Liong Sik; Menteri Perusahaan Utama, Datuk Seri Dr Lim Keng Yaik; Menteri Kerja Raya, Datuk Seri S Samy Vellu; Ketua Setiausaha Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Halim Ali; Ketua Hakim Negara, Tun Eusoff Chin; dan Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Mohtar Abdullah. Pelantikan Daim dan Kasitah diumumkan oleh Pejabat Perdana Menteri dua hari lalu. Daim, 60, yang juga Pengarah Eksekutif Majlis Tindakan Ekonomi Negara (MTEN), pernah memegang jawatan Menteri Kewangan dari 1984 hingga 1991 sebelum dilantik menjadi Penasihat Ekonomi Kerajaan. Perdana Menteri sebelum ini menjelaskan pelantikan Daim khusus berhubung pembangunan ekonomi dan usaha membantu menangani kegawatan ekonomi. Pelantikan Daim juga tidak akan menjejaskan dua kementerian lain iaitu Kementerian Kewangan dan Kementerian Perdagangan Industri dan Antarabangsa (Miti). Kasitah, 51, yang dilahirkan di Ranau, Sabah juga adalah Ketua Umno bahagian Kinabalu. Beliau mengangkat sumpah sebagai anggota Dewan Negara, semalam. Beliau sebelum ini pernah memegang jawatan Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri dari 1986 hingga 1988 dan Menteri Kemajuan Tanah dan Kemajuan Wilayah dari 1989 hingga 1990. (END).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Journal Malaysian Judiciary
JOURNAL JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY MALAYSIAN THE OF JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY January 2018 January 2018 Barcode ISSN 0127-9270 JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY January 2018 JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY MODE OF CITATION Month [Year] JMJ page ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE Publication Secretary, Judicial Appointments Commission Level 5, Palace of Justice, Precinct 3, 62506 Putrajaya www.jac.gov.my Tel: 603-88803546 Fax: 603-88803549 2018 © Judicial Appointments Commission, Level 5, Palace of Justice, Precinct 3, 62506 Putrajaya, Malaysia. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any material form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. Views expressed by contributors in this Journal are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Malaysian Judiciary, Judicial Appointments Commission or Malaysian Judicial Academy. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure that the information contained in this work is correct, the publisher, the editor, the contributors and the Academy disclaim all liability and responsibility for any error or omission in this publication, and in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done by any person in reliance, whether wholly or partially, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this publication.
[Show full text]
Chapter II the Method of Appointment of Judges to the Superior Courts of Malaysia Under the Federal Constitution and the Judicia
Chapter II The Method of Appointment of Judges to the Superior Courts of Malaysia Under the Federal Constitution and the Judicial Appointments Commission Despite the fact that the question of performing judicial functions independently by judges comes after their appointment, the method of appointment of judges is the crucial and dominant factor to ensure their substantive independence, the independence which greatly depends upon the independent character, integrity, equanimity, legal knowledge and keen intellect of the persons who would hold the office of judges. For, the appointment of a judge on account of political allegiance in utter disregard to the questions of his qualifications, merit, ability, competency, integrity and earlier performance as an advocate or judicial officer may bring in, to use the words of President Roosevelt, ‘Spineless Judges’ who can hardly be expected to dispense justice independently according to law and their own sense of justice without regard to the wishes and desire of the government of the day. There is a great possibility that such a judge may remain ‘indebted to those responsible for his designation ...., the beneficiary is exposed to the human temptation to repay his debt by a pliable conduct of his office’137 especially when the executive itself is a litigant. As H. J. Laski aptly said, ‘It is not necessary to suggest that there will be conscious unfairness; but it is .... possible that such judges will, particularly in cases where the liberty of the subject is concerned’, find themselves unconsciously biased through over-appreciation of executive difficulty...’138 Therefore, ‘in appointing judges, a government owes a duty to the people ..
[Show full text]
Unjust Order: Malaysia's Internal Security Act
Fordham International Law Journal Volume 26, Issue 5 2002 Article 1 Unjust Order: Malaysia’s Internal Security Act Nicole Fritz∗ Martin Flahertyy ∗ y Copyright c 2002 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Unjust Order: Malaysia’s Internal Security Act Nicole Fritz and Martin Flaherty Abstract This Report represents the culmination of a year-long project undertaken by the Crowley Pro- gram to update the study of the use and impact of the Internal Security Act (ISA) in Malaysia in light of international law obligations. We reference ﬁrst those international commitments that Malaysia has expressly adopted. However, these are very few–reﬂecting the antipathy felt by the Malaysian government for international obligations of this sort. Additionally, we have made ref- erence to the generally-accepted international law provisions applicable in this context–intended both to demonstrate the extent to which the ISA deviates from widely-upheld international norms, even if those norms are not ones expressly accepted by Malaysia. We have also referenced the extent to which other States, contemplating reviving or enacting similar laws, will fall afoul of their more readily undertaken international obligations in doing so. SPECIAL REPORT UNJUST ORDER: MALAYSIA'S INTERNAL SECURITY ACT Nicole Fritz* & Martin Flaherty** INTRODUCTION The Petronas Towers - two soaring office blocks in the heart of Kuala Lumpur - rise cleanly from their base. Few neighboring skyscrapers hem their space and it is this contrast to their surrounding landscape that makes them, arguably, even more arresting than the Twin Towers they so obviously recall.
[Show full text]
For Justice, Freedom & Solidarity
For Justice, Freedom & Solidarity PP3739/12/2007 ISSN 0127 - 5127 RM4.00 2007:Vol.27No.7 ~ page8page8~ Aliran Monthly : Vol.27(7) Page 1 ~ page40page40~ COVER STORY Redeem the judiciary: Appoint Royal Commission of Inquiry If we love justice, honour the rule of law; if fairness and truth means anything to us; then we must pay heed to the saying, “There is always time to make right what is wrong.” by P Ramakrishnan n independent judiciary AA is critical to the success AAA of the nation. It is an in- dependent judiciary that commands the respect and confi- dence of the people of a country and ensures the rule of law. With- out an independent judiciary there will be no fairness, no jus- tice, no truth, no accountability. It is for these reasons that we must insist on a judiciary that is not beholden to any individual or powers-that-be. A democracy is but a name and a sham without an independent ju- diciary. All the trappings of a de- mocracy and judiciary do not ‘All the guarantee justice or democracy. We have what is claimed as the trappings biggest courtroom buildings re- ferred to as the Palace of Justice of a and an imposing parliamentary democracy building termed as a first-class luxury. and judiciary But, as the explosive Lingam do not videoclip has revealed to the country, we do not have a ‘first guarantee class’ justice or democracy. It is justice or only a perception, an illusion and nothing more - no matter what democracy.’ Datuk Nazri may claim! Aliran Monthly : Vol.27(7) Page 2 EDITOR'S NOTE What are we focusing on in this issue? Correct! Cor- rect! Correct! It’s the explosive Lingam video clip CONTENTS and the impact it has had on Malaysian society.
[Show full text]
Aliran Monthly 20(4) Page 1 PP3739/12/2000 ISSN 0127
PP3739/12/2000 ISSN 0127 - 5127 / RM3.00 / 2000:20(4) Aliran Monthly 20(4) Page 1 COVER STORY When The Quitting Gets Tough Would Ling Liong Sik’s resignation really matter? by Khoo Boo Teik hen he realized last year that Barisan Nasional’s WWW political fortune rested heavily on non-Malay (read Chinese) support, Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad favourably compared the Chinese with the Malays. Unlike the Malays, said he, the Chinese were rational and unemotional and knew what was good (BN) and what was bad (opposition) for them. Arguably BN’s retention of a large proportion of Chinese support in the November 1999 general elec- tion suggested that there were enough Chinese who were flat- replaceable loss’, ‘irreparable the United Malays National Or- tered thus by Mahathir. But damage’ or ‘betrayal of trust’. ganization (UMNO)? should anyone be persuaded that the Chinese are more rational and This emotional outflow was not If, however, Ling’s aim was to less emotional than ‘people of matched by rational or persuasive shield MCA against any fallout other races’? answers to key questions raised from a rumoured investigation by Ling’s announcement. linking his son, Lim Hee Leong, Chinese Opera with the latter’s ex-business part- Why, for example, should the MCA ner and now fugitive, Soh Chee Watch the ‘Chinese reactions’ to president quit his Cabinet post Wen – an ‘evil lie that can only the little opera the Malaysian Chi- now when his party had just per- come out of an evil mind’, accord- nese Association has been enact- formed very well in two succes- ing to Ling – why should the MCA ing since 22 May 2000, when sive general elections, something leadership so anxiously reject it? MCA president, Dr Ling Liong Sik, MCA had not been able to accom- announced he would resign as plish before November 1999? Divided And Minister of Transport.
[Show full text]
PARLIMEN KESEMBILAN Ninth Parliament PENGGAL KEDUA
PARLIMEN KESEMBILAN Ninth Parliament PENGGAL KEDUA Second Session MESYUARAT KETIGA Third Meeting Jilid II Bil. 64 Hari Isnin 18hb. November 1996 _________________________________________________________________ K A N D U N G A N JAWAPAN-JAWAPAN MULUT BAGI PERTANYAAN- PERTANYAAN (Ruangan 1) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG DIBAWA KE DALAM MESYUARAT (Ruangan 40) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG: Rang Undang-undang Perbekalan 1997 (Ruangan 40) Jawatankuasa: Jadual - Maksud B.1, B2, B.3, B.4, B.5, B.6, B.7, B.8, B.9, B.10, B.11, B. 12 dan B.13. (Ruangan 43) USUL: Anggaran Pembangunan 1997 Jawatankuasa: Maksud P.7 dan P.8 (Ruangan 43) Oktober, 1996. DEWAN RAKYAT YANG KESEMBILAN PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN Penggal Yang Kedua AHLI-AHLI DEWAN RAKYAT Yang Berhormat Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Tan Sri Dato’ Mohamed Zahir bin Haji Ismail, P.M.N., S.P.M.K., D.S.D.K. J.M.N. Yang Amat Berhormat Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Dato’ Seri Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, D.K.I., D.U.K., S.S.D.K., S.S.A.P., S.P.M.S., S.P.M.J., D.P., D.U.P.N., S.P.N.S., S.P.D.K., S.P.C.M., S.S.M.T., D.U.N.M., P.I.S. (Kubang Pasu) Yang Amat Berhormat Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan, Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim, D.U.P.N., S.S.A.P., S.S.S.A., D.G.S.M., S.P.N.S., S.P.D.K., D.M.P.N. (Permatang Pauh) Yang Berhormat Menteri Pengangkutan, Dato’ Seri Dr.
[Show full text]
Imagereal Capture
A FRAGILE BASTION UNDER SIEGE - THE 1988 CONVULSION IN THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY BY H. P. LEE* INTRODUCTION Every government in the world swears belief in the independence of the judiciary, but some governments work subtly to undermine it.' In 1988 a constitutional drama with disturbing implications for constitutional- ism unfolded in Malay~ia.~For the first time in Malaysian legal history, the highest judicial officer in the land was suspended and, after an inquiry to determine whether he should be removed for alleged 'misbehaviour', was subsequently rem~ved.~Following in the wake of this shocking development, two other senior judges of the Supreme Court were, after an inquiry by a second tribunal, also removed from office. The high drama should be seen in the context of a 'high stakes' political struggle within the ranks of the United Malay National Organisation or * LL.B., LL.M., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Law, Monash University. I benefited from the award of an Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee Fellowship which enabled me to conduct the research for this article in Malaysia and Singapore from December 1988-January 1989. I wish to record my gratitude to the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore for receiving me during that period as a Visiting Research Scholar. 1 Tun Mohamed Suffian, 'The Role of the Judiciary' [I9871 2 Malayan Law Journal xxiii, xxiv. 2 See, generally, Tun Salleh Abas, The Role of the Independent Judiciary (The Sir John Foster Galaway Memorial Lecture delivered at University College, London, on 4 November 1988). The Lecture was published in book form by Promarketing Publications in 1989; Tun Salleh Abas with Das, K., May Day for Justice (1989); Hickling, R.
[Show full text]
The New Brooms by Malik Imtiaz Sarwar
The new brooms By Malik Imtiaz Sarwar We have a new team heading the judiciary. Congratulations to Chief Justice Tan Sri Ariffin Zakaria, President of the Court of Appeal Tan Sri Md Raus Sharif and Chief Malik Imtiaz Sarwar Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin. They are all men with many years of experience in the judicial and legal services. They are also men who, having started their careers as judges in the High Court, have had the opportunity to gain invaluable insights into not only the mechanics of being a judge, but also the workings of the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. I believe they are fully equipped to deal with the challenge of managing one of the most important institutions of the nation and wish them well in their endeavour. It is my hope that these three judges and their colleague, Chief Judge Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri Richard Malanjum, see in this ''changing of the guard'' the opportunity that presents itself to make major inroads into restoring public confidence in the judiciary and seize it. For this to happen, however, they must acknowledge, even if only to themselves, that public confidence is not as high as it ought to be and as it was in the late 1980s, and that steps need be taken to address the situation. In some quarters, there are those who, admittedly somewhat cynically, suggest that although in the early days of the new appointments there will be some attempt to play to the gallery, such efforts will soon fade into obscurity.
[Show full text]
Tan Ying Hong V Tan Sian San &
Tan Ying Hong v Tan Sian San & Ors [2010] 2 MLJ 1 A Tan Ying Hong v Tan Sian San & Ors FEDERAL COURT (KUALA LUMPUR) — CIVIL APPEAL NO 02(F)-19 OF 2009(C) B ZAKI AZMI CHIEF JUSTICE, ALAUDDIN PCA, ARIFIN ZAKARIA CJ (MALAYA), ZULKEFLI AND JAMES FOONG FCJJ 21 JANUARY 2010 C Land Law — Indefeasibility of title and interests — Forged charge — Proper construction to be accorded to s 340(1), (2) and (3) of the National Land Code — Whether Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd v Boonsom Boonyanit @ Sun Yoke Eng [2001] 1 MLJ 241 case should be followed — Whether proviso after s 340(3) D applied to other provisions of s 340 — National Land Code s 340(1), (2) & (3) The plaintiff/appellant (‘appellant’) was the registered owner of a piece of land situated in Kuantan, Pahang (‘the land’) which was charged to the E United Malayan Banking Corp, the third respondent, to secure loans amounting to RM300,000 made in favour of Cini Timber Industries Sdn Bhd, the second respondent. The ﬁrst respondent, who was purporting to act under a power of attorney, had executed the charges in favour of the third respondent bank. The appellant only became aware of the charges when he F received a notice of demand from the third respondent. The appellant claimed that he had not signed the power of attorney, that it was forged and that the charge instruments executed in favour of the third respondent were void. The appellant then ﬁled a claim in the High Court seeking, inter alia, a declaration that the said charges were void, an order expunging from the G register and the issue document of title the memorial of charges against the land and an order directing the third respondent to deliver up to him the issue document of title to the land.
[Show full text]
RELIGIOUS CASES in the MALAYSIAN COURTS1 by Aston Paiva2
RELIGIOUS CASES IN THE MALAYSIAN COURTS1 by Aston Paiva2 “In a multi-racial and multi religious society like yours and mine, while we judges cannot help being Malay or Chinese or Indian; or being Muslim or Buddhist or Hindu or whatever, we strive not to be too identified with any particular race or religion – so that nobody reading our judgement with our name deleted could with confidence identity our race or religion, and so that the various communities, especially minority communities, are assured that we will not allow their rights to be trampled underfoot.” Tun Mohamed Suffian Lord President, Braddel Memorial Lecture (1982)3 1 This paper seeks to ascertain the role of the Malaysian Judiciary in constitutional rights cases, the propriety and effect of certain Malaysian court decisions on religious apostasy and the reforms that ought to be made to resolve the uncertainties created by the said court decisions 2 Barrister-at-Law (Grays), Advocate & Solicitor of the High Court in Malaya (Malaysia) practising at Messrs Bon. The author is on the legal team of Muhamad Juzaili [2015] 1 CLJ 954 (CA), Indira Gandhi [2015] 6 CLJ 35 (HC) and Maqsood Ahmad & 38 Ors v Majlis Agama Islam Selangor & 4 ors, High Court Kuala Lumpur, Application for Judicial Review No. 25-129-07/2014 (HC) (pending) (http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/after-years-of-persecution-ahmadiyya- followers-seek-redress-at-civil-court)) (See also: ‘Syariah’ in Malaysia; http://www.loyarburok.com/2015/09/23/syariah-malaysia/) 3 The Constitution of Malaysia, F A Trindale and H P Lee (1986), pp.
[Show full text]
Towering Figures, Forgotten Heroes
PP3739/12/2005 ISSN 0127 - 5127 / RM4.00 / 2005:Vol.25No.1 ToweringToweringTowering Figures,Figures,Figures, ForgottenForgottenForgotten HeroesHeroesHeroes Water Must Not Fall IntoFall Into Private Hands Aceh:Aceh:Aceh: Picking Up The Pieces Aliran Monthly : Vol.25(1) Page 1 A personal account COVER STORY Towering figures and forgotten heroes People like the former Auditor-General Tan Sri Ahmad Noordin should be held up as a role model by Mustafa K Anuar ost of us, young and old, MM yearn for our own heroes MMM or role models to provide much-needed inspira- tion and informal guidance in our daily lives. These ‘super humans’ can take the form of personalities such as Spiderman, Sting, Mother Teresa and Gandhi. It is the same for a community or a nation: we look for our heroes, people who can propel us to greater heights. In the early 1980s, Malaysians were encouraged to ‘Look East’ to emulate the supposedly good work ethics and other virtues of the industrialised Japanese and Koreans. Not too long after that, the Mahathir administration in- troduced the notion of Melayu Baru, or New Malay. It was a con- scious attempt to prepare a group of Malays to undergo mental and cultural transformation and aban- don the feudalism of the old Malay culture in the face of a challeng- ing industrialised, capitalistic world. Looking in the wrong places Recently, as if to suggest the fail- Forgotten heroes (from top left): Usman Awang, Tan Chee Khoon, Ahmad Noordin, ure of his predecessor in his re- people of Tambunan and Papan protestors Aliran Monthly : Vol.25(1) Page 2 EDITOR'S NOTE The cover story by Mustafa Anuar reflects on the PM’s call to Malays to look for towering CONTENTS figures in their community who could inspire others.
[Show full text]
Chapter 3 Contempt of Court in Malaysia
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Durham e-Theses Durham E-Theses THE CONTEMPT POWER: A SWORD OR A SHIELD? A STUDY OF THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT IN MALAYSIA. MOHD-SHERIFF, SHUKRIAH How to cite: MOHD-SHERIFF, SHUKRIAH (2010) THE CONTEMPT POWER: A SWORD OR A SHIELD? A STUDY OF THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT IN MALAYSIA., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/536/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE CONTEMPT POWER: A SWORD OR A SHIELD? – A STUDY OF THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT IN MALAYSIA. SHUKRIAH MOHD SHERIFF A DOCTORAL THESIS SUBMITTED TO DURHAM UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (LAW) 2010 Dedication To my dearest parents: The Late Dato’ Hj.
[Show full text]