Journal Malaysian Judiciary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Journal Malaysian Judiciary JOURNAL JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY MALAYSIAN THE OF JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY January 2018 January 2018 Barcode ISSN 0127-9270 JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY January 2018 JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY MODE OF CITATION Month [Year] JMJ page ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE Publication Secretary, Judicial Appointments Commission Level 5, Palace of Justice, Precinct 3, 62506 Putrajaya www.jac.gov.my Tel: 603-88803546 Fax: 603-88803549 2018 © Judicial Appointments Commission, Level 5, Palace of Justice, Precinct 3, 62506 Putrajaya, Malaysia. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any material form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. Views expressed by contributors in this Journal are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Malaysian Judiciary, Judicial Appointments Commission or Malaysian Judicial Academy. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure that the information contained in this work is correct, the publisher, the editor, the contributors and the Academy disclaim all liability and responsibility for any error or omission in this publication, and in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done by any person in reliance, whether wholly or partially, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this publication. ISSN 0127-9270 (bi-annually) Published by Judicial Appointments Commission Level 5, Palace of Justice, Precinct 3, 62506 Putrajaya, Malaysia. Editing, design and layout by for RDA Press Sdn Bhd THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIAL Academy Chairman The Rt. Hon. Tun Raus Sharif Chief Justice MEMBers The Rt. Hon. Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin President of the Court of Appeal The Rt. Hon. Tan Sri Dato’ Sri Ahmad bin Haji Maarop Chief Judge of Malaya The Rt. Hon. Tan Sri Datuk Seri Panglima Richard Malanjum Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Justice Tan Sri Datuk Zainun binti Ali Judge of the Federal Court Justice Tan Sri Dato’ Sri Azahar bin Mohamed Judge of the Federal Court Justice Tan Sri Zaharah binti Ibrahim Judge of the Federal Court Justice Dato’ Sri Balia Yusof bin Haji Wahi Judge of the Federal Court Justice Tan Sri Dato’ Wira Aziah binti Ali Judge of the Federal Court Justice Datuk Nallini Pathmanathan Judge of the Court of Appeal Justice Datuk Dr. Badariah binti Sahamid Judge of the Court of Appeal Secretary Mr. Wan Khairilanwar bin Wan Muhammad Secretary, Judicial Appointments Commission PUBlication COMMITTEE OF THE Malaysian Judicial Academy ManaGING EDITOR Justice Tan Sri Datuk Zainun binti Ali Judge of the Federal Court MEMBers Justice Dato’ Alizatul Khair binti Osman Khairuddin Judge of the Federal Court Justice Tan Sri Idrus bin Harun Judge of the Court of Appeal Justice Datuk Nallini Pathmanathan Judge of the Court of Appeal Justice Datuk Dr. Badariah binti Sahamid Judge of the Court of Appeal Mr. Wan Khairilanwar bin Wan Muhammad Secretary, Judicial Appointments Commission Ms. Adibah Al-Husna binti Abdul Rahim Deputy Secretary, Judicial Appointments Commission Secretary Ms. Suraiya binti Mustafa Kamal Judicial and Legal Officer Officers Ms. Azniza binti Mohd Ali Judicial and Legal Officer Ms. Maimoonah binti Aid Judicial and Legal Officer PANEL OF REFEREES Justice I Gusti Agung Sumanatha, S.H., M.H. Hakim Agung Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Justice Madan Bhimarao Lokur Judge of the Supreme Court India Justice Belinda Ang Judge of the Supreme Court Singapore Justice Brian W Lennox Judge of the Ontario Court of Justice Canada Associate Professor Dr Johan Shamsuddin Sabaruddin Dean, Faculty of Law Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Professor Leong Wai Kum National University of Singapore Singapore David Pittaway QC Head of Hailsham Chambers, London United Kingdom Associate Professor Low Chee Keong CUHK Business School Hong Kong Preface We are on the cusp of an exciting time ahead, because for the first time, the JMJ invites writers from outside the small niche of judges from our Judiciary. The depth and weight this has added to our publication is invaluable. In this, one is reminded of the remark made by Lord Cooke of Thorndon (New Zealand Court of Appeal and Lord of Appeal in the House of Lords), that we can now “enjoy the luxurious advantage of the freedom to ransack the case laws of the larger English speaking jurisdictions”, and in this we can afford to be eclectic. We have yet another first; in that the Chief Justice, in recognising the allure of having referees to advise, influence, reform and refine the shape of our nascent publication, has invited eminent personalities to be members of the JMJ’s Panel of Referees. Their input promises to give it profundity and élan. The thrill derived from the range of all these diverse talents is, one hopes, the appeal of our publication. Justice Zainun Ali Managing Editor CONTENTS Royal Address by His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Almarhum Sultan Iskandar, the Sultan of Johor, at the Opening Ceremony of the Muar Court Complex on Thursday, January 18, 2018 ...........................1 Shaping the Future of Arbitration in Malaysia The Rt. Hon. The Chief Justice Tun Raus Sharif .................................................5 To Intervene or Not to Intervene Justice Dato’ Mary Lim Thiam Suan .................................................................15 Freedom of Contract and Legislative Intervention: Determining Common Properties in Strata Development Justice Dato’ Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera ...........................................................32 Lifting of the Corporate Veil Justice S Nantha Balan ......................................................................................57 Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Justice Azizul A Adnan ....................................................................................107 Cyber Defamation in Malaysia: An Overview Justice Mohamed Zaini bin Mazlan .................................................................124 Skinning the Cat: Claims against Private Healthcare Providers David Pittaway QC ..........................................................................................145 The Business Judgment Rule: A Safe Harbour for Directors? Associate Professor Low Chee Keong and Low Tak Hay ..................................159 The Shine on Semenyih Jaya: Resurrecting Judicial Power Dato’ Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar .........................................................................192 Of Public Interest, Freedom of Speech and the Law of Defamation Darryl SC Goon ...............................................................................................206 Royal Address by His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Almarhum Sultan Iskandar, the Sultan of Johor, at the Opening Ceremony of the Muar Court Complex on Thursday, January 18, 2018 Ladies and Gentlemen, The Federal Constitution is the supreme law of Malaysia. It is an all encompassing living instrument which has taken into account the interests of all parties as well as the historical background of this country. Our Constitution is based upon the Westminster system of democracy with a constitutional monarchy. The Federal Constitution came into effect in 1957 and continues to be the source of governance in Malaysia. Nevertheless, there have been amendments and improvements made to the Federal Constitution since its inception, to cater to the prevailing needs and requirements of the country at various points in time. If those amendments prove to be detrimental today, I must then suggest that the matter be rectified for the sake of the country’s stability and the people’s well-being. The State of Johor was the first government in Malaysia to have a written Constitution and to practise the system of constitutional monarchy. It began when the late Sultan Abu Bakar declared the Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Johor on September 14, 1895. Up till today, the Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Johor, which provides for the manner of governance and rules on how the government should be administered, is still used without much amendment. Ladies and Gentlemen, To maintain the country’s stability, our system of separation of powers must be protected. The three main components of Government, namely the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary, must be independent and each must have the right to decide on matters falling within its own jurisdiction. No component holds absolute power. If the power to administer, to enact laws and to adjudicate disputes is bestowed 2 Journal of the Malaysian Judiciary January [2018] JMJ on a single individual or component, it will encourage autocratic governance. There will then be no check and balance. The jurisdiction of Parliament is only to enact laws. A law which is to be enforced must be passed by three entities, namely the Dewan Rakyat (House of Representatives), the Dewan Negara (Senate) and the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. These three entities must be given freedom to exercise their functions in decision-making so as to ensure a complete process in the enacting of laws. The Executive, on the other hand, must administer in accordance with enacted laws. Whenever there is dispute in relation to administration,
Recommended publications
  • 09 Lim Index.Indd 142 5/16/08 3:10:49 PM Index 143
    INDEX 1982 Federal election, 82 Anwar Ibrahim, 66, 69, 109 1994 Sabah State elections, 81 Anti-Corruption Agency, 62 Asek bin Pintar, 96 A Assistant Residents, 21 ABC system, 84–86, 99–100, 120 Association for the Relief of A. G. Sahari, Datuk Haji, 106 Calamity, 36 Abell, Anthony (Sir), 57 Abdilah Hassan, 80 B Abdul Rahman (Tunku), see Tunku Bajau, 16 Abdul Rahman hostility with Kadazan-Dusun Abdul Razak (Tun), see Tun Abdul communities, 18 Razak Bank Islam Malaysia, 69 Aceh, 12 Bank Kerjasama Rakyat, 62 Adat rituals, 113 Banten, 12 Administration of Muslim Law Barisan Nasional, 1, 6, 53 Enactment, 109 constitutional amendments, 54 Advisory Council for Native Affairs expulsion of USNO from, 77–78 (ACNA), 31 Basel Church, 30 membership, 32, 34 BERJAYA administration, 63, 68 Affendi Stephen, Haji, 80 developmentalist approach to Ahmad Raffae, Pangiran Haji, 50 Islamization, 122 Alcock, Rutherford (Sir), 20, 39 economic transformation under, Aliuddin, A.K., 63 82–86 Amanah Saham Nasional, 120 failing to live up to multiracial Amanah Saham Rakyat Sabah, 89, pledges, 122 99 financial allocation for Islamic Amanah Saham Rakyat, 89 activities, 107 Amanah Saham Tun Hj Datu Islamization drive, 120 Mustapha, 88 political economy, 84–86 Angkatan Belia Islam (ABIM), 69 setting up of training courses, 94 142 09 Lim Index.indd 142 5/16/08 3:10:49 PM Index 143 BERJAYA Corporate Governance C institutional expansion of, Chartered Company Territory, 39 87–89 China BERJAYA party, 7, 56 education curriculum, 30 1981 State Elections, 78 China Borneo Company,
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia 2019 Human Rights Report
    MALAYSIA 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Malaysia is a federal constitutional monarchy. It has a parliamentary system of government selected through regular, multiparty elections and is headed by a prime minister. The king is the head of state, serves a largely ceremonial role, and has a five-year term. Sultan Muhammad V resigned as king on January 6 after serving two years; Sultan Abdullah succeeded him that month. The kingship rotates among the sultans of the nine states with hereditary rulers. In 2018 parliamentary elections, the opposition Pakatan Harapan coalition defeated the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition, resulting in the first transfer of power between coalitions since independence in 1957. Before and during the campaign, then opposition politicians and civil society organizations alleged electoral irregularities and systemic disadvantages for opposition groups due to lack of media access and malapportioned districts favoring the then ruling coalition. The Royal Malaysian Police maintain internal security and report to the Ministry of Home Affairs. State-level Islamic religious enforcement officers have authority to enforce some criminal aspects of sharia. Civilian authorities at times did not maintain effective control over security forces. Significant human rights issues included: reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings by the government or its agents; reports of torture; arbitrary detention; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; reports of problems with
    [Show full text]
  • (Incorporated in Malaysia) (Company No
    (Incorporated in Malaysia) (Company No. 3907-W) [This page is intentionally left blank] CONTENTS 2 Corporate Information 3 - 5 Profile of Board of Directors 6 Group Financial Highlights 7 - 9 Chairman’s Statement 10 - 13 Audit and Risk Management Committee Report 14 - 16 Statement On Corporate Governance 17 Statement On Internal Control 18 - 54 Financial Statements 55 List of Properties/Material Contracts 56 Statement of Directors’ Shareholdings 57 - 59 Statistics of Shareholdings 60 - 62 Notice of Annual General Meeting Form of Proxy CORPORATE INFORMATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUDITORS Tan Sri Datuk Amar Chong Siew Fai Ernst & Young - Chairman Chartered Accountants Level 23A, Menara Milenium Chan Kien Sing Jalan Damanlela Mark Wee Liang Yee Pusat Bandar Damansara Robert Yong Kuen Loke 50490 Kuala Lumpur Derek Chin Chee Seng Lim Meng Kwong REGISTERED OFFICE Heng Kiah Choong John Ko Wai Seng 11th Floor, Menara Berjaya (Alternate Director to Mark Wee Liang Yee) KL Plaza, 179 Jalan Bukit Bintang 55100 Kuala Lumpur SECRETARIES Tel: 03-2935 8888 Fax: 03-2935 8043 Su Swee Hong (MAICSA No. 0776729) Wong Pooi Cheong (MAICSA No. 0782043) PRINCIPAL BANKERS AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Berhad Bumiputra-Commerce Bank Berhad Tan Sri Datuk Amar Chong Siew Fai - Chairman/Independent Non-Executive Director STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING Chan Kien Sing Main Board of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange - Non-Independent/Non-Executive Director STOCK SHORT NAME Heng Kiah Choong - Independent Non-Executive Director MATRIX (3239) SHARE REGISTRARS PLACE OF INCORPORATION AND DOMICILE Berjaya Registration Services Sdn Bhd Malaysia Lot C1-C3, Block C 2nd Floor, KL Plaza 179 Jalan Bukit Bintang 55100 Kuala Lumpur Tel: 03-2145 0533 Fax: 03-2145 9702 MATRIX INTERNATIONAL BERHAD Incorporated in Malaysia (Company No.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Court Criminal Appeal No: 05(Hc)-153-11/2020 (W)
    FEDERAL COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 05(HC)-153-11/2020 (W) High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur Criminal Application No. WA-44-207-10/2020 ZAIDI BIN KANAPIAH … APPELLANT AND 1. ASP KHAIRUL FAIROZ BIN RODZUAN 2. MAJISTRET MAHKAMAH MAJISTRET KUALA LUMPUR 3. KETUA POLIS NEGARA MALAYSIA 4. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA … RESPONDENTS Heard together with FEDERAL COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 05(HC)-155-11/2020 (W) High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur Criminal Application No. WA-44-206-10/2020 MOHD HAIRY BIN MOHAMMAD … APPELLANT AND 1. ASP KHAIRUL FAIROZ BIN RODZUAN 1 | Page 2. MAJISTRET MAHKAMAH MAJISTRET KUALA LUMPUR 3. KETUA POLIS NEGARA MALAYSIA 4. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA … RESPONDENTS And FEDERAL COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 05(HC)-156-11/2020 (W) High Court of Malaya at Kuala Lumpur Criminal Application No. WA-44-208-10/2020 MUHAMAD AMIN NUR RASHID BIN MOHAMED PUAD … APPELLANT AND 1. ASP KHAIRUL FAIROZ BIN RODZUAN 2. MAJISTRET MAHKAMAH MAJISTRET KUALA LUMPUR 3. KETUA POLIS NEGARA MALAYSIA 4. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA … RESPONDENTS 2 | Page CORAM TENGKU MAIMUN TUAN MAT, CJ VERNON ONG LAM KIAT, FCJ ZALEHA YUSOF, FCJ HASNAH MOHAMMED HASHIM, FCJ RHODZARIAH BUJANG, FCJ SUMMARY OF GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT [1] The central issue in these appeals is the constitutionality of Section 4 of the Prevention of Crime Act 1959 (" POCA"). The Federal Constitution (‘FC”) is the heartbeat of this great Nation defining the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary parameters, intricately woven yet profoundly independent of each other. The sanctity of the FC must be respected, jealously protected, staunchly
    [Show full text]
  • (A Division of Reed Elsevier (S) Pte Ltd) the Malayan Law Journal PDF
    Page 1 3 of 993 DOCUMENTS © 2009 LexisNexis Asia (a division of Reed Elsevier (S) Pte Ltd) The Malayan Law Journal PDF Print Format Takako Sakao (f) v Ng Pek Yuen (f) & Anor [2009] 6 MLJ 751 CIVIL APPEAL NO 02(f)-20 OF 2009(W) FEDERAL COURT (PUTRAJAYA) DECIDED-DATE-1: 16 OCTOBER 2009 RICHARD MALANJUM CJ (SABAH AND SARAWAK), ZULKEFLI AND GOPAL SRI RAM FCJJ CATCHWORDS: Evidence - Adverse inference - Failure of first respondent to give evidence refuting appellant's testimony - Whether appellant's evidence should be presumed to be true - Whether there was misdirection on part of lower courts to address this omission - Whether misdirection amounted to miscarriage of justice that warranted interference Trusts and Trustees - Constructive trusts - Intention to create a trust - Pre- existing fiduciary relationship between appellant and first respondent - Arrangement to jointly own property - Whether constructive trust had arisen by operation of law - Whether appellant acquired any enforceable rights against respondents - Whether s 433B of the National Land Code applied to constructive trusts Trusts and Trustees - Trustees - Characteristics of trustee - Whether constructive trustee had acted in breach of her fiduciary duties - Whether appellant acquired any enforceable rights against respondents HEADNOTES: The appellant, a Japanese citizen and the first respondent were business partners in a restaurant. Sometime in September 1992, they decided to acquire the shop house ('the property') in which they operated their restaurant business. According to the appellant the property was to be purchased and registered in the joint names of herself and the first respondent in equal shares and she had provided RM194,610 as her contribution towards the purchase price.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Judiciary in Environmental Dispute Resolution
    TTT Developing Environmental Law Champions Program ‘The Role of the Judiciary in Environmental Dispute Resoluon’ Presenter: Tan Sri Datuk Seri Panglima Richard Malanjum Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak cum Federal Court Judge Federal Court Malaysia 13.07.2017 Contents • Introducon • Environmental disputes – nature, pares, scope, etc. • Types of dispute resoluons • Domesc Judicial Resoluon channel on environmental disputes – conservave and progressive local experience in enhancing domesc judicial resoluon on environment • Challenges on the judiciary in environmental disputes resoluon at domesc level • Conclusion Introducon • Praccal and non- academic approach • The Judiciary – Third arm of government – Determined by Constuon and judicial personnel • Role – crical role as arbiter and non-arbiter in enforcement of environmental laws – statutory and non- statutory • Excessive reliance on the Execuve through its departmental agencies on environment in enforcement • Arbitral aspect – criminal, civil and administrave • Focus on arbitral aspect with reference to Malaysian experience Introducon • Environmental courts – a judicial arbiter specializing in adjudicang environmental, resource development, land use, and related disputes – The Encyclopedia of Environmental Law, by Jusne Thornton (United Kingdom) • Recent origin 1972 – Stockholm Declaraon • Japan, Denmark, Ireland • 1992 Rio Declaraon Principle 10 • Aarhus Convenon – Arcle 9 Introducon • Paris Agreement on Climate Change • UNEP REPORT- May 2017: Courts Are An ‘Important Tool’ To Impose Global Warming Laws • Paris Agreement “enables ligants to construe governments’ commitments and acons as being adequate or inadequate.” • “The Paris Agreement by its own terms does not provide ligants with a cause of acon or impose enforceable limits on member countries’ naonal emissions”. “But it makes it possible for ligants to place the acons of their governments or private enes into an internaonal climate change policy context.” Environmental disputes – nature, pares, scope, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • MOHAMAD EZAM MOHD NOOR V. KETUA POLIS NEGARA & OTHER
    Mohamad Ezam Mohd Noor v. [2002] 4 CLJ Ketua Polis Negara & Other Appeals 309 MOHAMAD EZAM MOHD NOOR a v. KETUA POLIS NEGARA & OTHER APPEALS FEDERAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR b MOHAMED DZAIDDIN CJ WAN ADNAN ISMAIL PCA STEVE SHIM CJ (SABAH & SARAWAK) ABDUL MALEK AHMAD FCJ SITI NORMA YAAKOB FCJ c [BIL: 05-8-2001(W), 05-9-2001(W), 05-10-2001(W), 05-11-2001(W) & 05-12-2001(W)] 6 SEPTEMBER 2002 EVIDENCE: Fresh or further evidence - Additional evidence - Criminal appeals, power of Federal Court to take additional evidence - Courts of d Judicature Act 1964, s. 93(1) - “if it thinks additional evidence to be necessary” - Whether means additional evidence ‘necessary or expedient in the interests of justice’ - Requirements of ‘non-availability’, ‘relevance’ and ‘reliability’ - Ladd v. Marshall e CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Judge - Recusal - Bias - Test to be applied - Real danger of bias test - Reasonable apprehension of bias test - Whether judge was right in refusing to recuse himself PREVENTIVE DETENTION: Internal Security Act - Application and scope of - Whether enacted specifically and solely to deal with threat of f communism in Malaysia - Whether to deal with all forms of subversion - Federal Constitution, art. 149 - Internal Security Act 1960, long title and preamble PREVENTIVE DETENTION: Internal Security Act - Detention - Internal Security Act 1960, s. 73(1) - Exercise of discretion by police officer - g Whether justiciable - Whether amenable to judicial review - Preconditions in s. 73(1), whether objective or subjective - ‘Reason to believe’ - Whether objectively justiciable - Whether court can examine sufficiency and reasonableness of police officer’s ‘reason to believe’ - Whether burden on police to show compliance with preconditions in s.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE -.: School of Humanities, USM
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE 1 PERSONAL DATA Name: CHAN NGAI WENG Gender: Male Date of Birth: 17th April 1954 Citizenship: Malaysian Marital Status: Married Children: 3 Current Position: Professor Field of Specialisation: Hydroclimatology, Water Resources and Hazards Management 2 EDUCATION & TRAINING College/University Qualification/Degree Date University of Malaya B.A. (Hons) Geography, 2nd Class Upper 1977 University of Malaya M.A. (Climatology and Meteorology) 1981 Middlesex University (UK) PhD (Environmental Hazards Management) 1995 Awarding Organisation Certificates/Diplomas Date American Red Cross (Mid- Adult, Infant & Child CPR 2001 South Chapter) American Red Cross (Mid- Community, First Aid & Safety 2001 South Chapter) Japan International Certificate in “Capacity Building For Environmental 2003 Cooperation Agency (JICA) NGOs” The Malaysian Environmental Certificate in “Conflict Management and 2006 NGO (MENGO) Consensus Building” 3 WORKING EXPERIENCE Position Organisation/Department Date Tutor University of Malaya 1977-1986 Lecturer Universiti Sains Malaysia 1986-1996 Tutor (Part-Time) Middlesex University (UK) 1991-1995 Associate Professor Universiti Sains Malaysia 1996-2001 Visiting Professor (Fulbright) The University of Memphis 2000-2001 Professor Grade C (VK7) Universiti Sains Malaysia 2001-2008 Professor Grade B (VK6) Universiti Sains Malaysia 2009-2017 Professor (Flexible Retired Scholar Scheme) 2017 2 Academic Assessor Environmental Management Programme 2005 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Visiting Professor Urban Environmental Management Department 2006-2007 Asian Institute of Technology Academic Assessor Assessing Panel for Environmental Management 2007 Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Panel Assessor Malaysian Qualification Agency 2008 Externer Assessor University of Malaya Staff Promotion Panel 2011 4 AWARDS, SCHOLARSHIPS, PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS, AFFILIATIONS AND ACADEMIC RECOGNITION AWARDS: Certificate of Service Excellence – Awarded by Universiti Sains Malaysia to the top 5 % of employees.
    [Show full text]
  • DR LOURDES DAVA RAJ CURUZ DURAI RAJ V. DR MILTON LUM SIEW WAH & ANOR
    JE34/2020 10 September 2020 Dr Lourdes Dava Raj Curuz Durai Raj [2020] 5 MLRA v. Dr Milton Lum Siew Wah & Anor 333 DR LOURDES DAVA RAJ CURUZ DURAI RAJ v. DR MILTON LUM SIEW WAH & ANOR Federal Court, Putrajaya Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat CJ, Rohana Yusuf PCA, Azahar Mohamed CJM, David Wong Dak Wah CJSS, Nallini Pathmanthan FCJ [Civil Appeal No: 02(i)-118-12-2018(W)] 29 July 2020 Administrative Law: Judicial review — Judicial review proceedings — Rules of natural justice — Adverse order made against person directly affected who was deprived of his right to be heard — Whether rules of natural justice breached — Whether order a nullity and ought to be set aside — Whether principle in Hong Leong Bank Bhd v. Staghorn Sdn Bhd & Other Appeals applied — Rules of Court 2012, O 15 r 6, O 53 r 4(2) The appellant (‘Dr Lourdes’) was, at the material time, the Chief Medical Service Officer and person in charge of Assunta Hospital. The 1st respondent (‘Dr Milton’) was then a Visiting Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist at the same hospital while the 2nd respondent was the Malaysian Medical Council (‘MMC’). Pursuant to a complaint by Dr Milton, the MMC charged Dr Lourdes with infamous conduct in a professional respect. An inquiry was carried out and, by a majority, the MMC found that Dr Lourdes had no case to answer. Dr Milton was dissatisfied with the outcome of the inquiry and proceeded to institute judicial review proceedings for an order of certiorari against the MMC’s majority decision. Dr Milton additionally sought a declaration that Dr Lourdes was guilty of the charge against him and that the MMC be ordered to hear his plea in mitigation and for the imposition of an appropriate sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • ANG GAME HONG & ANOR V. TEE KIM TIAM &
    JE 20/20 2 January 2020 Ang Game Hong & Anor [2019] 6 MLRA v. Tee Kim Tiam & Ors 477 ANG GAME HONG & ANOR v. TEE KIM TIAM & ORS Federal Court, Putrajaya Ahmad Maarop PCA, Zaharah Ibrahim CJM, Aziah Ali, Alizatul Khair Osman Khairuddin, Rohana Yusuf FCJJ [Civil Appeal No: 01(f)-41-09-2017 (B)] 15 October 2019 Civil Procedure: Jurisdiction — Judgment of the High Court — Orders — Judgment in default and consent order entered by another High Court of concurrent jurisdiction — Setting aside — Whether following the decision of Badiaddin Mohd Mahidin & Anor v. Arab Malaysian Finance Bhd and Serac Asia Sdn Bhd v. Sepakat Insurance Brokers Sdn Bhd, a High Court can set aside an order of another High Court of concurrent jurisdiction that have been obtained in breach of rules of natural justice This was an appeal against the High Court’s decision allowing, among others, the plaintiff/1st respondent’s action for a declaration that he was a bona fide purchaser and proprietor of a piece of land which he had purchased pursuant to a Sale and Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) between him and the 1st defendant/2nd respondent. The land was registered under the 1st defendant’s father’s name, Tan Yew Lin (“TYL”) and upon TYL’s death, the 1st defendant inherited the land. TYL had a brother by the name of Tan Tuan Kam (“TTK”), who married the 2nd defendant and had a son who was the 3rd defendant. TTK had also passed away. The 2nd and 3rd defendants contended, inter alia, that the land was registered under TYL’s name although TTK was the one who bought it, because TTK wanted to help TYL who was then unemployed; and upon a promise made by TYL that he would later transfer the land to TTK.
    [Show full text]
  • Keynote Speech Yb Tuan Chong Chieng Jen Deputy Minister of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs
    KEYNOTE SPEECH YB TUAN CHONG CHIENG JEN DEPUTY MINISTER OF DOMESTIC TRADE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS IN MALAYSIAN AEON FOUNDATION CHARITY GALA DINNER 2018 ‘UNDER OUR WINGS’ ON 7 SEPTEMBER 2018 (FRIDAY) AT GRAND SUNWAY CONVENTION CENTRE MALAYSIAN AEON FOUNDATION CHARITY GALA DINNER 2018 ‘UNDER OUR WINGS’ [KEYNOTE SPEECH] Thank you Master of Ceremony; Good Evening and Konbanwa. -Salutation- Distinguish guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, 1. First and foremost I would like to take this 2 MALAYSIAN AEON FOUNDATION CHARITY GALA DINNER 2018 ‘UNDER OUR WINGS’ [KEYNOTE SPEECH] opportunity to convey a message from Yang Berhormat Minister, Dato’ Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. He said, “Congratulations AEON Foundation for being able to organize this wonderful and remarkable event” 3 MALAYSIAN AEON FOUNDATION CHARITY GALA DINNER 2018 ‘UNDER OUR WINGS’ [KEYNOTE SPEECH] 2. YB Minister is unable to join us tonight due to other commitment and responsibilities hence I will represent him to officiate the event tonight. Congratulations again to the Committee Members of the Malaysian AEON Foundation in organizing 4 MALAYSIAN AEON FOUNDATION CHARITY GALA DINNER 2018 ‘UNDER OUR WINGS’ [KEYNOTE SPEECH] and hosting the Charity Gala Dinner 2018, as well as many others who have given their support and co-operation to ensure the success of this annual fund raising event. Ladies and Gentlemen, 3. I made to understand that the fund will be 5 MALAYSIAN AEON FOUNDATION CHARITY GALA DINNER 2018 ‘UNDER OUR WINGS’ [KEYNOTE SPEECH] utilise for all the activities of the Foundation and will be benifitted to all Malaysian especially the children and youth regardless of race, religion or creed.
    [Show full text]
  • Offer Malaysiakini.Com Feb 8, 2014 Sarawak DAP Wants the Police To
    Shocked by PM's silence over 'money for slap' offer MalaysiaKini.com Feb 8, 2014 Sarawak DAP wants the police to act against the NGO that offered a cash reward for slapping Seputeh MP Teresa Kok. “It has never happened in Malaysia where a person offers a reward to commit crime,” Sarawak DAP chairperson Chong Chieng Jen said. Chong, who is the MP for Bandar Kuching, urged this after lodging a report at the Simpang Tiga police station in Kuching yesterday against the NGOs which slaughtered four chickens in Kuala Lumpur and smeared the blood on a banner bearing photographs of opposition leaders. At the protest, the Muslim Consumers Association of Malaysia (PPIM) offered a reward of RM500 - and later increased it to RM1,200 - to anyone who slaps the MP and provides photographic evidence of this. Speaking to the media after filing the police report, Chong said: “The offer itself is an act of crime that is intended to criminally intimidate as well as intended to commit violence. “We want the police to take action. We have given them 12 hours from 3pm today (yesterday) to take action, failing which the police will be accused of condoning such acts of violence,” said Chong, who is also a lawyer. “Moreover, if anything happens to the MP for Seputeh, the police will be held responsible for their act of nonfeasance (failure to perform their duty as required by the law),” he said. More police reports A rather annoyed Chong said even more than 24 hours after the money-for-slap offer had been made and publicised, Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, his deputy Muhyiddin Yassin and Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi were all keeping mum, as if they were condoning the crime.
    [Show full text]