DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 3 Contempt of Court in Malaysia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Durham e-Theses Durham E-Theses THE CONTEMPT POWER: A SWORD OR A SHIELD? A STUDY OF THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT IN MALAYSIA. MOHD-SHERIFF, SHUKRIAH How to cite: MOHD-SHERIFF, SHUKRIAH (2010) THE CONTEMPT POWER: A SWORD OR A SHIELD? A STUDY OF THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT IN MALAYSIA., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/536/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE CONTEMPT POWER: A SWORD OR A SHIELD? – A STUDY OF THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT IN MALAYSIA. SHUKRIAH MOHD SHERIFF A DOCTORAL THESIS SUBMITTED TO DURHAM UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (LAW) 2010 Dedication To my dearest parents: The Late Dato’ Hj. Mohd Sheriff Puteh & Hajjah Wan Sepiah Wan Ibrahim For giving all the love, support and encouragement throughout the duration of my studies To my beloved husband: Muhammad Syahmi Mohd Karim For your love, sacrifices, support and tolerance given whilst you were also struggling with your Ph.D To my dearest daughters: Hanan Afiqah Muhammad Syahmi Hanan Insyirah Muhammad Syahmi For all the love and understanding given whilst I was completing my thesis. Indeed, they have made my life meaningful during my academic journey in Durham. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Alhamdulillah, all praise to Allah, the most gracious and the most merciful for the guidance and blessing in realising my goal to achieve this success in my studies. The process of accomplishing this thesis has gone through numerous challenges in which many parties have been involved directly or indirectly in giving assistance, support and encouragement. I wish to express my utmost gratitude to all of them for their willingness to assist me in the process of completing this thesis. In researching this rather complicated area of law, I had the exceptional privilege of having Professor Michael Bohlander as my main supervisor. His wide interest and experience have been particularly helpful in tackling the problems I encountered during the course of this thesis writing. The encouragement he generously gave me at every stage of this work made the whole task extremely interesting. I am indebted to him for his source of motivation and continuous support. The amount of knowledge and experience that I gained is invaluable. Professor Ian Leigh as my second supervisor also deserves similar appreciation and gratitude for his help, guidance and encouragement. I am also indebted to him. I am also thankful to the staff of Durham Law School for their help. It is also my pleasure to dedicate my special thanks and appreciation to my sponsors – International Islamic University Malaysia and the Government of Malaysia for giving all the financial support throughout the duration of my studies. Most of all, my special gratitude to all my family members especially to my husband; Muhammad Syahmi, my daughters; Hanan Afiqah and Hanan Insyirah, my mother; Hajjah Wan Sepiah; my mother in law; Hajjah Pon and my sisters; Faizah and Mashitah. They have supported me with their endless love, moral support, prayers and encouragement. This work is especially dedicated to my late father; Dato’ Hj. Mohd Sheriff Puteh who passed away while I was in the midst of completing my thesis. My father had always been my source of strength and had never failed to inspire me in my academic pursuits. Last but not least, thanks to all my friends who in their different ways have all encouraged me to complete my studies. May Allah always give His blessings to them in this world and the hereafter. Ameen. ii DECLARATION I hereby declare that no portion of the work that appears in this study has been used in support of an application of another degree in qualification to this or any other university or institutions of learning Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No extract from it should be published without her prior written consent, and all information derived from it should be acknowledged iii ABSTRACT The issue relating to contempt of court has caught the attention of people from all walks of life in Malaysia, particularly, after the controversial incidents of the removal of Tun Salleh Abbas, the then Lord President, in 1988 and the dismissal of the former Deputy Prime Minister, Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim, in 1998. The judiciary is attacked and its independence is questioned. The lawyers are placed under the threat of contempt proceedings when they tried to exercise their right to freedom of speech and expression and to exercise their duty to act for their clients without fear or favour. The Bar feels that the right to freedom of speech and expression is infringed. The Bar perceives that the contempt power was being misused by the judges. The Malaysian law of contempt of court is derived from the English common law tradition and is characterised by substantial flexibility. This flexibility results in variable approaches and perceptions by judges that leave uncertainties in this area of law. Consequently, a draft of Contempt of Court Act 1999 has been proposed to the Malaysian government with the main intention of overcoming uncertainties in the law. Placing the comprehensive rules in a statute will allow easier access to and greater clarity of the law because all the rules and procedures would be found in one piece of legislation. This thesis aims to state and explain the law and the practice of contempt of court in Malaysia. This study will examine the anomalies that derived from the substantial flexibility approaches by the judges in this area of law. Thorough examination and analysis would help identifying the problems and dilemma and the way that the draft Contempt of Court Act 1999 could provide remedies for the predicaments. To illuminate the understanding of the actual practical problem, this study incorporates in-depth interviews together with questionnaire surveys. A total of 15 in-depth interviews have been conducted among the Malaysian judicial officers, advocates and prosecutors. This is further complemented by postal questionnaires sent to these selected legal actors chosen at random in accordance with their seniority, aiming at eliciting their knowledge and opinion on the subject matter at hand. The combinations of theoretical discussion on contempt of court, together with the empirical study, have proved to yield a valuable insight into the re-evaluation of the Malaysian law and practice of contempt of court. This research reveals that the uncertainties in the law of contempt of court in Malaysia were ‘caused’ by the inconsistencies in the application and approaches by the judges. The judges have unfettered discretion in determining contempt cases. The majority of the Malaysian legal actors support the idea of placing the law of contempt in a piece of legislation in order to overcome these arbitrariness and uncertainties. They hold that to have credence, the law of contempt would have to be well-defined, as in the absence of any clear guidelines it would be unmerited to imprison anyone for contempt. iv DEDICATION i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii DECLARATION iii ABSTRACT iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF CASES viii LIST OF TABLES xvi LIST OF DIAGRAM xvii ABBREVIATIONS xviii Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Background Research and Statements of the Problem 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study 3 1.3 Research Question 4 1.4 Research Methodology 4 1.5 Literature Review 5 1.6 Outline of Chapters 8 Chapter 2: The Malaysian Legal System 2.1 THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENTS OF THE EXISTING 12 MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM 2.1.1 The Legal System in the Post-Independence Period 14 2.2 THE JUDICIARY AND THE PRESENT MALAYSIAN LEGAL 16 SYSTEM 2.2.1 The Judiciary and the Sources of Law 18 2.2.2 The Courts and the Legal Actors 24 2.2.2.1 The Structure and the Jurisdiction of the Courts 24 2.2.2.2 The Legal Actors 31 2.3 FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND CONTEMPT OF COURT: AN INTRODUCTION TO FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES AND 40 HUMAN RIGHTS IN MALAYSIA 2.3.1 Malaysia and Human Rights 43 Chapter 3: Contempt of Court in Malaysia 3.1 THE MALAYSIAN LAW OF CONTEMPT OF COURT 50 3.1.1 Jurisdiction 50 3.1.2 Definition of Contempt 52 3.1.2.1 Civil Contempt versus Criminal Contempt 54 3.1.2.2 Classification of Contempt 57 3.1.3 Mens Rea or Intent 82 3.1.4 Mode of Trial or Procedures 84 3.1.4.1 Procedures in the Superior Courts 85 3.1.4.2 Procedures in the Subordinate Courts 89 3.1.5 Sanctions and Remedies 91 v 3.2 MAIN AREAS OF CONCERN IN THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF 93 CONTEMPT OF COURT IN MALAYSIA 3.2.1 What is Contempt and Its Classification: Actus Reus and its Test 93 of Liability 3.2.2 Mens Rea and Defences 97 3.2.3 Mode of Trial or Procedures 100 3.2.4 Sanctions and Remedies 103 3.2.5 Judges and Judicial Approach 104 3.2.5.1 Inconsistencies
Recommended publications
  • Malaysia Pacific Land Berhad 12200-M

    Malaysia Pacific Land Berhad 12200-M

    Malaysia Pacific Land Berhad 12200-M Unlocking our hidden POTENTIAL in pursuit of continuous GROWTH Annual Report 2003 EM & J ...we will continue our effort to improve the occupancy rate by focusing on our marketing strategies and approach. Contents Notice of Annual General Meeting 2 Statement Accompanying Notice of Annual General Meeting 3 Corporate Information 4 Board of Directors & Profile 5 Chairman’s Statement 8 Board Audit & Risk Management Committee 11 Corporate Governance 14 Statement on Internal Control 18 Financial Statements 19 Other Information 51 Form of Proxy cover rationale The theme which focuses on a hand holding a key represents the approach MPL carried out throughout its operations and the role our people play. Setting clear and inspiring goals and introducing the necessary changes, we always strive to surpass ourselves to maintain as a trusted partner and acquire an advantage best positioned to weather the regions prevailing economic storm & flourish in the new operating environment that is beginning to emerge. Our top priority is to provide value to our customers and ultimately gain profitable returns to our shareholders.Thus, unlocking the hidden potential of the Group and bringing out new opportunities that are waiting to be explored. Notice of Annual General Meeting NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Thirty-First Annual General Meeting of MALAYSIA PACIFIC LAND BERHAD (the “Company”) will be held at the Theatrette, Level 1,Wisma Hong Leong, 18 Jalan Perak, 50450 Kuala Lumpur on Tuesday, 23 December 2003 at 10.30 a.m. in order: 1. To receive and consider the audited financial statements together with the reports of the Directors and Auditors thereon for the year ended 30 June 2003.
  • Papers Published in 2018 1. Diviya Santhanes

    Papers Published in 2018 1. Diviya Santhanes

    Papers published in 2018 1. Diviya Santhanes; Che Pui Yong; Yan Ye Yap; Sulaiman, Pui San Saw; Khan, TM; Factors influencing intention to obtain the HPV vaccine in South East Asian and Western Pacific regions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Scientific reports 10.1038/s41598-018-21912-x. Nature Publishing 2. Aftab, Raja Ahsan; Khan, Amer Hayat; Adnan, Azreen Syazril; Sulaiman, Syed Azhar Syed; Khan, TM; Safety and Efficacy of Losartan 50 mg in Reducing Blood Pressure among Patients with Post-Dialysis Euvolemic Hypertension: A Randomized Control Trial. Nature Scientific reports 7(1)(2018) 17741. Nature Publishing 3. Salmasi, Shahrzad; Wimmer, Barbara C; Khan, Khan, TM; Patel, Rahul P; Ming, Long Chiau; Quantitative exploration of medication errors among older people: a systematic review. Drugs & Therapy Perspectives (2018). Springer International Publishing 4. Salmasi, Shahrzad; Lee, Kah Seng; Ming, Long Chiau; Neoh, Chin Fen; Elrggal, Mahmoud E; Khan, Khan, TM; Hadi, Muhammad Abdul; Pricing appraisal of anti-cancer drugs in the South East Asian, Western Pacific and East Mediterranean Region. BMC cancer 17(1) 2018(903). 5. Bukhsh, Allah; Rehman, Habib-ur; Rehman, Inayat Ur; Khan, TM; Mallhi, Tauqeer Hussain; Parents’ Attitude, Awareness and Behaviour towards Influenza Vaccination in Pakistan. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. (2018) Taylor & Francis. 6. Ma, Dexter Swee Liang; Hern, Teng; Loh, Tan; Chan, Kok Gan; Yap, Wei Hsum; Chuah, Lay-Hong; Khan, TM; Lee, Learn-Han; Goh, Bey Hing; Resveratrol–potential antibacterial agent against foodborne pathogens. Frontiers in Pharmacology 9(2018) 102 7. Mahmoud, Mansour Adam; Alsowaida, Yazed; Alshammari, Thamir; Khan, Tahir Mehmood; Alrasheedy, Alian; Hasssali, Mohamad Azmi; Aljadhey, Hisham.
  • King in Critical Condition but Stable, Istana Negara Says

    King in Critical Condition but Stable, Istana Negara Says

    20 NOV 2001 Agong-Critical KING IN CRITICAL CONDITION BUT STABLE, ISTANA NEGARA SAYS KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 20 (Bernama) -- The Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, who is being treated further at the Gleneagles Intan medical centre here, is in critical condition but is still stable, an Istana Negara statement said today. "According to medical specialists treating his majesty, the King is now in critical condition and requires intensive care. However his majesty is still stable," said the statement signed by Istana Negara coordinator Datuk Ishak Ahmad. Sultan Salahuddin is undergoing further treatment at the medical centre since Sunday upon being treated for almost two months at the Mount Elizabeth Hospital in Singapore. "Let us all Malaysians pray to God the Almighty for his majesty's well-being and recovery," the statement said. According to the statement, Sultan Azlan Shah of Perak and the Raja Permaisuri of Perak Tuanku Bainun, the Raja Muda of Perak and the King's son the Regent of Selangor were among the Malay Rulers who visited his majesty today. Yesterday's visitors include the Deputy Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin and Permaisuri Nur Zahirah, the Yang Dipertuan Besar Negeri Sembilan Tuanku Ja'afar and Tuanku Ampuan Najihah, the Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad and wife Datin Seri Dr Siti Hasmah Mohamed Ali. The Menteri Besar of Selangor Datuk Seri Dr Mohamad Khir Toyo and wife Datin Zaharah Kechik had also visited the King. His majesty continued to receive a stream of visitors up till late afternoon, including members of the royalty notably his younger brother Tengku Besar Putra Azam and the Tengku Mahkota of Pahang Tengku Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah.
  • Arms Procurement Decision Making Volume II: Chile, Greece, Malaysia

    Arms Procurement Decision Making Volume II: Chile, Greece, Malaysia

    4. Malaysia Dagmar Hellmann-Rajanayagam* I. Introduction Malaysia has become one of the major political players in the South-East Asian region with increasing economic weight. Even after the economic crisis of 1997–98, despite defence budgets having been slashed, the country is still deter- mined to continue to modernize and upgrade its armed forces. Malaysia grappled with the communist insurgency between 1948 and 1962. It is a democracy with a strong government, marked by ethnic imbalances and affirmative policies, strict controls on public debate and a nascent civil society. Arms procurement is dominated by the military. Public apathy and indifference towards defence matters have been a noticeable feature of the society. Public opinion has disregarded the fact that arms procurement decision making is an element of public policy making as a whole, not only restricted to decisions relating to military security. An examination of the country’s defence policy- making processes is overdue. This chapter inquires into the role, methods and processes of arms procure- ment decision making as an element of Malaysian security policy and the public policy-making process. It emphasizes the need to focus on questions of public accountability rather than transparency, as transparency is not a neutral value: in many countries it is perceived as making a country more vulnerable.1 It is up 1 Ball, D., ‘Arms and affluence: military acquisitions in the Asia–Pacific region’, eds M. Brown et al., East Asian Security (MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1996), p. 106. * The author gratefully acknowledges the help of a number of people in putting this study together.
  • Muslim Father's Rights in Determining His Minor Child's Conversion to Islam in Malaysia

    Muslim Father's Rights in Determining His Minor Child's Conversion to Islam in Malaysia

    ISSN 2411-9563 (Print) European Journal of Social Sciences May-August 2015 ISSN 2312-8429 (Online) Education and Research Volume 2, Issue 3 Muslim Father’s Rights in Determining His Minor Child’s Conversion to Islam in Malaysia Dr Zuliza Mohd Kusrin ([email protected]) Senior Lecturer of Department of Shariah, Faculty of Islamic Studies, The National University of Malaysia (UKM) Affiliation in Comparative Family Law and Constitutional Human Rights Associate Professor Dr Salasiah Hanin Hamjah ([email protected]) Associate Professor of Department of Dakwah, Faculty of Islamic Studies, The NationaI University of Malaysia (UKM) Affiliation in Islamic Counselling Associate Professor Dr Fariza Md Sham ([email protected]) Associate Professor of Department of Dakwah, Faculty of Islamic Studies, The NationaI University of Malaysia (UKM) Affiliation in Dakwah Psychology among Adolescents Abstract Freedom of religion is guaranteed by the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. For children, their rights to freedom of religion are mentioned in Article 12(4) of the Federal Constitution. However, there is conflict of law, i.e. between the civil law and Sharia Law, in some cases involving the child’s conversion to Islam, following the conversion of his or her parents. This article aims to discuss on provisions of the Federal Constitution on the child’s right to the freedom of religion. The discussion also elucidate on the father’s right in determining his minor child’s conversion to Islam. The methodology used in gathering relevant data is content analysis. Data was gathered from Sharia Laws, legal provisions, law journals and reported cases relevant to the issue.
  • OL MYS 6/2018 28 December 2018

    OL MYS 6/2018 28 December 2018

    PALAIS DES NATIONS • 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression REFERENCE: OL MYS 6/2018 28 December 2018 Excellency, I have the honour to address you in my capacity as Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 34/18. Your Excellency’s Government has made several important and encouraging commitments to restore and protect freedom of expression in Malaysia. In light of these commitments, I am writing to provide a preliminary analysis of proposed and adopted legislation in the areas of sedition, press freedom, defamation, “fake news,” official secrets and film censorship, taking into consideration your Excellency’s Government’s obligations to respect, protect and promote the right to freedom of expression under international human rights law. I. INTRODUCTION Upon the election of the Pakatan Harapan coalition in May 2018, your Excellency’s Government promised to fight corruption and to “abolish laws that are oppressive and unfair”. In addition, the new Government has communicated to me its intention to reform laws and policies widely viewed as inconsistent with the country’s obligations under international human rights law. For instance, in June 2018, your Government responded to a communication concerning the Anti-Fake News Act of 2018 (ref. no MYS 1/2018), assuring this mandate that the Government had already begun the process of repealing the Act. At present, I understand that several laws that restrict freedom of opinion and expression in Malaysia remain in force.
  • (Incorporated in Malaysia) (Company No

    (Incorporated in Malaysia) (Company No

    (Incorporated in Malaysia) (Company No. 3907-W) [This page is intentionally left blank] CONTENTS 2 Corporate Information 3 - 5 Profile of Board of Directors 6 Group Financial Highlights 7 - 9 Chairman’s Statement 10 - 13 Audit and Risk Management Committee Report 14 - 16 Statement On Corporate Governance 17 Statement On Internal Control 18 - 54 Financial Statements 55 List of Properties/Material Contracts 56 Statement of Directors’ Shareholdings 57 - 59 Statistics of Shareholdings 60 - 62 Notice of Annual General Meeting Form of Proxy CORPORATE INFORMATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUDITORS Tan Sri Datuk Amar Chong Siew Fai Ernst & Young - Chairman Chartered Accountants Level 23A, Menara Milenium Chan Kien Sing Jalan Damanlela Mark Wee Liang Yee Pusat Bandar Damansara Robert Yong Kuen Loke 50490 Kuala Lumpur Derek Chin Chee Seng Lim Meng Kwong REGISTERED OFFICE Heng Kiah Choong John Ko Wai Seng 11th Floor, Menara Berjaya (Alternate Director to Mark Wee Liang Yee) KL Plaza, 179 Jalan Bukit Bintang 55100 Kuala Lumpur SECRETARIES Tel: 03-2935 8888 Fax: 03-2935 8043 Su Swee Hong (MAICSA No. 0776729) Wong Pooi Cheong (MAICSA No. 0782043) PRINCIPAL BANKERS AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Berhad Bumiputra-Commerce Bank Berhad Tan Sri Datuk Amar Chong Siew Fai - Chairman/Independent Non-Executive Director STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING Chan Kien Sing Main Board of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange - Non-Independent/Non-Executive Director STOCK SHORT NAME Heng Kiah Choong - Independent Non-Executive Director MATRIX (3239) SHARE REGISTRARS PLACE OF INCORPORATION AND DOMICILE Berjaya Registration Services Sdn Bhd Malaysia Lot C1-C3, Block C 2nd Floor, KL Plaza 179 Jalan Bukit Bintang 55100 Kuala Lumpur Tel: 03-2145 0533 Fax: 03-2145 9702 MATRIX INTERNATIONAL BERHAD Incorporated in Malaysia (Company No.
  • 1988 Crisis: Salleh Shot Himself in the Foot? Malaysiakini.Com Apr 23, 2008 P Suppiah

    1988 Crisis: Salleh Shot Himself in the Foot? Malaysiakini.Com Apr 23, 2008 P Suppiah

    1988 crisis: Salleh shot himself in the foot? Malaysiakini.com Apr 23, 2008 P Suppiah The personalities involved in the entire episode are as follows: * The then Yang Di Pertuan Agong (the King), now the Sultan of Johor * Tun Salleh Abas, who was then the Lord President * The prime minister (Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who was then Datuk Seri Dr), * The then attorney-general, Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman, now Suhakam chief. The whole episode started with Salleh writing a letter to the King dated March 26, 1988, copies of which were sent to the Malay rulers. On May 27, 1988 the prime minister in the presence of high-ranking government officials informed Salleh that the King wished him to step down (to retire as Lord President) because of the said letter. Salleh on May 28, 1988 sent a letter of resignation: the next day he withdrew it and subsequently held a press conference. On June 9, 1988 the prime minister made a second representation to the King alleging further misconduct on the part of Salleh based on his undignified use of the press to vent his grievances – such as requesting for a public hearing of the tribunal and asking for persons of high judicial standing to sit on the tribunal. On June 11, 1988, members of the tribunal were appointed pursuant to the Federal Constitution by the King. On June 14, 1988, Salleh was served with the list of charges against him. On June 17, 1988, Salleh was served with a set of rules to govern the tribunal procedure.
  • Ong Boon Hua @ Chin Peng & Anor V. Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negri

    Ong Boon Hua @ Chin Peng & Anor V. Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negri

    The Malaysian Bar Ong Boon Hua @ Chin Peng & Anor v. Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negri, Malaysia & Ors 2008 [CA] Friday, 20 June 2008 09:11PM ONG BOON HUA @ CHIN PENG & ANOR V. MENTERI HAL EHWAL DALAM NEGERI, MALAYSIA & ORS COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA [CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-01-87-2007] LOW HOP BING JCA; ABDUL MALIK ISHAK JCA; SULAIMAN DAUD JCA 15 MAY 2008 JUDGMENT Abdul Malik Ishak JCA: The Background Facts 1. Cessation of armed activities between the Government of Malaysia and the Communist Party of Malaya was a welcome news for all Malaysians. It became a reality on 2 December 1989. On that date, an agreement was entered between the Government of Malaysia (the fourth respondent/defendant) and the Communist Party of Malaya (the second appellant/applicant) to terminate armed hostilities between the parties (hereinafter referred to as the "agreement"). With the signing of the agreement, armed hostilities between the parties ended and peace prevailed. The terms of the agreement can be seen at p. 235 of the appeal record at Jilid 1 (hereinafter referred to as "ARJ1"). There were four articles to that agreement and the relevant ones read as follows: Article 3 - Residence In Malaysia 3.1 Members of the Communist Party of Malaya and members of its disbanded armed units, who are of Malaysian origin and who wish to settle down in Malaysia, shall be allowed to do so in accordance with the laws of Malaysia. 3.2 Members of the Communist Party of Malaya and members of its disbanded armed units, who are not of Malaysian origin, may be allowed to settle down in MALAYSIA in accordance with the laws of MALAYSIA, if they so desire.
  • FAUZILAH SALLEH V. UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA TERENGGANU HIGH

    FAUZILAH SALLEH V. UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA TERENGGANU HIGH

    Fauzilah Salleh v. [2012] 4 CLJ Universiti Malaysia Terengganu 601 A FAUZILAH SALLEH v. UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA TERENGGANU B HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA TERENGGANU MOHD YAZID MUSTAFA J [CIVIL SUIT NO: 22-02-2009] 16 OCTOBER 2011 C ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Rules of natural justice - Right to be heard - Breach of - Revocation of Master’s Degree by University due to allegation of plagiarism - Whether there was a violation of the university’s constitution - Whether University partly contributed to commission of plagiarism - Whether plaintiff accorded right to be heard D The plaintiff was awarded a Master’s Degree in Marketing Science from the defendant University. She was then offered by the defendant University a three-years PhD course commencing on 23 July 2006 and ending on 22 July 2009. On 22 January 2007, an inquiry was held by the Jawatankuasa Penyiasatan (‘the E inquiry’) where the plaintiff appeared as a witness before a committee. After a lapse of one year, the plaintiff received a letter dated 22 January 2008 from the Registrar of the defendant University informing her that the Chancellor of the defendant University, on the recommendation of the board of the University, F had revoked her Master’s Degree under cl. 57(1)(b) and cl. 2 of the constitution of the defendant university on the ground that she had committed plagiarism. Aggrieved, the plaintiff filed the present suit claiming that the revocation of her Master’s Degree by the defendant University was in violation of cl. 57 of the said G constitution and the principle of natural justice. She also asked for a declaration that the revocation was invalid and an order for the return of the degree to her, damages, interests and costs.
  • Laws of Malaysia

    Laws of Malaysia

    Banking and Financial Institutions 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 372 BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT 1989 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 IN COLLABORATION WITH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BHD 2006 2 BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT 1989 Date of Royal Assent ………… 23 August 1989 Date of publication in the Gazette … 24 August 1989 PREVIOUS REPRINT First Reprint ... ... ... ... ... 2001 3 LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 372 BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT 1989 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Functions, powers and duties of Bank PART II LICENSING OF BANKING, FINANCE COMPANY, MERCHANT BANKING, DISCOUNT HOUSE AND MONEY-BROKING BUSINESSES 4. Banking, finance company, merchant banking, discount house and money- broking businesses to be carried on only under licence 5. Submission of application for licence to the Bank 6. Grant or refusal of application by Minister 7. Revocation of licence 8. Imposition of restrictions in lieu of revocation of licence 9. Power to impose new conditions and to vary or revoke conditions imposed on licence under subsection 6(4) or this section 10. Notice of revocation of licence, imposition of restrictions, or variation or revocation of conditions, or imposition of new conditions 11. Mandatory revocation of licence and restriction of licence in cases of emergency 12. Surrender of licence 4 Laws of Malaysia ACT 372 Section 13. Prohibition on carrying on of licensed business upon revocation, expiry of duration, or surrender, of licence 14.
  • Journal Malaysian Judiciary

    Journal Malaysian Judiciary

    JOURNAL JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY MALAYSIAN THE OF JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY January 2018 January 2018 Barcode ISSN 0127-9270 JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY January 2018 JOURNAL OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY MODE OF CITATION Month [Year] JMJ page ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE Publication Secretary, Judicial Appointments Commission Level 5, Palace of Justice, Precinct 3, 62506 Putrajaya www.jac.gov.my Tel: 603-88803546 Fax: 603-88803549 2018 © Judicial Appointments Commission, Level 5, Palace of Justice, Precinct 3, 62506 Putrajaya, Malaysia. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any material form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. Views expressed by contributors in this Journal are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Malaysian Judiciary, Judicial Appointments Commission or Malaysian Judicial Academy. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure that the information contained in this work is correct, the publisher, the editor, the contributors and the Academy disclaim all liability and responsibility for any error or omission in this publication, and in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done by any person in reliance, whether wholly or partially, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this publication.