Report Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report Template Ethiopia-Sudan Power System Interconnection Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Final Report CONTENTS Table of Contents Abbreviations Acknowledgements Executive Summary 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Previous Studies ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Present Study ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Scope and Objectives of ESIA................................................................................... 2 1.5 Methodology and ESIA Resourcing ........................................................................... 3 1.5.1 Overview ...................................................................................................... 3 1.5.2 Option C ...................................................................................................... 3 1.5.3 Option B (B1/B2) ......................................................................................... 4 1.5.4 Option A ....................................................................................................... 5 1.5.5 ESIA Resourcing ......................................................................................... 5 2 Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework......................................... 6 2.1 Ethiopia ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 The Federal Constitution ............................................................................. 6 2.1.2 Environmental Policy of Ethiopia ................................................................. 7 2.1.3 Sectoral Policies .......................................................................................... 7 2.1.4 Institutional Arrangement for Environmental Protection .............................. 8 2.1.5 Environmental Impact Assessment Proclamation ....................................... 8 2.1.6 Environmental Pollution Control Proclamation ............................................ 9 2.1.7 Legislation on Expropriation of Land and Compensation............................ 9 2.1.8 Legislation on Preservation of Cultural Heritage ....................................... 10 2.1.9 Environmental Guidelines ......................................................................... 10 2.1.10 Institutional and Administrative Framework .............................................. 11 2.1.11 Adequacy of Environmental Procedures and Guidelines .......................... 12 2.2 Sudan .......................................................................................................................13 2.2.1 The Interim National Constitution .............................................................. 13 2.2.2 Legislative Framework............................................................................... 15 2.2.3 Relevant Policies and Institutions .............................................................. 18 2.3 Institutional Capacity within Ethiopian and Sudanese Power Authorities ...............19 2.3.1 EEPCO ...................................................................................................... 19 Ethiopia-Sudan Power System Interconnection ESIA: Final: October 2006 i in Association with ACP Consulting Engineers 2.3.2 NEC ........................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Private Sector Capacity ...........................................................................................19 2.5 World Bank ..............................................................................................................20 2.5.1 Environment .............................................................................................. 20 2.5.2 Rural Development .................................................................................... 20 2.5.3 Social Development ................................................................................... 20 2.6 International Agreements .........................................................................................21 3 Project Description ................................................................................. 23 3.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................23 3.2 Location and Justification ........................................................................................23 3.3 Route Description Option C .....................................................................................24 3.4 Description of Proposed Works ...............................................................................24 3.5 Ancillary Facilities and Services ..............................................................................25 3.6 Operation and Maintenance Activities .....................................................................25 3.7 Area of Impact .........................................................................................................25 3.8 Project Implementation ............................................................................................26 3.9 Project Cost .............................................................................................................26 4 Baseline Data .......................................................................................... 27 4.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................27 4.2 Physical Environment ..............................................................................................27 4.2.1 Topography and Geology .......................................................................... 27 4.2.2 Soils ........................................................................................................... 29 4.2.3 Climate....................................................................................................... 29 4.2.4 Surface and Groundwater Resources ....................................................... 31 4.3 Biological Environment ............................................................................................32 4.3.1 Vegetation ................................................................................................. 32 4.3.1.1 Vegetation of Option C ...............................................................32 4.3.1.2 Vegetation of Option B (B1/B2) ..................................................34 4.3.1.3 Vegetation of Option A ...............................................................35 4.3.2 Wildlife ....................................................................................................... 35 4.3.2.1 Wildlife of Option C .....................................................................36 4.3.2.2 Wildlife of Option B (B1/B2) .......................................................36 4.3.2.3 Wildlife of Option A .....................................................................37 4.3.3 Areas of Ecological Importance ................................................................. 37 4.4 Socio-cultural Environment ......................................................................................37 4.4.1 Administrative Framework ......................................................................... 38 4.4.1.1 Option C .....................................................................................38 4.4.1.2 Option B1/B2 ..............................................................................39 4.4.1.3 Option A .....................................................................................40 4.4.2 Demographic Features .............................................................................. 40 4.4.2.1 Option C .....................................................................................40 4.4.2.2 Option B1/B2 ..............................................................................42 Ethiopia-Sudan Power System Interconnection ESIA: Final: October 2006 ii in Association with ACP Consulting Engineers 4.4.2.3 Option A .....................................................................................45 4.4.3 Education ................................................................................................... 47 4.4.3.1 Option C .....................................................................................47 4.4.3.2 Option B1/B2 ..............................................................................48 4.4.3.3 Option A .....................................................................................48 4.4.4 Health ........................................................................................................ 50 4.4.4.1 Option C .....................................................................................50 4.4.4.2 Option B1/B2 ..............................................................................51 4.4.4.3 Option A .....................................................................................52 4.4.5 Cultural Heritage ........................................................................................ 52 4.5 Economic Activities ..................................................................................................54
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Epidemiological Study of Bovine Trypanosomosis in Wenbera
    Epidemiological Study Of Bovine Trypanosomosis In Wenbera District, Metekal Zone Of Benishagul Gumuz Regional State, Western Ethiopia [1] Dawit Tesfaye, [1] Tesfa Feleke and [2] Derara Birasa 1 National Tsetse flies and Trypanosomosis Control and Eradication Institute of Ethiopia, Assosa 2 Jimma University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, P. O. Box 307, Jimma, Ethiopia Corresponding author: [email protected]; phone: +251910186937/+251910186937 Abstract: Cross-sectional study was conducted in Wanbera district of Benishangul-Gumuz Regional State, Western Ethiopia from February, 2019 to April 2019 to assess the prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis and association risk factors. During this survey, blood samples of 384 randomly selected cattle (Bosindicus) were examined using Buffy coat techniques. The packed cell volume (PCV) value of each animal was measured using hematocrit reader. Descriptive statistics was held to analyze the findings using STATA version 14.0 software packages. Chi square test was used to determine the association between different risk factors (age, sex, Body condition and location) and trypanosomosis infection. Out of 384 cattle examined, 8(2.08%) were found positive for trypanosomosis. The highest prevalence was revealed in Bagondy village 4 (50%) followed by Muz village 3(37.5%) and the lowest was recorded in Zamatiya village 1(12.5%). Trypanosome congolense (75%) was the most dominant trypanosome species identified followed by T. vivax (25%). The mean packed cell volume (PCV) value of infected animals was 17.92%±3.356 for trypanosome positive animals and 27.22%±2.748 for non-infected animals. Similarly, the highest prevalence (87.5%) of trypanosomosis infection was registered in animals with poor body condition score.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report Includes Results from Tigray Response
    Ethiopia Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report Includes results from Tigray Response © UNICEF Ethiopia/2021/Nahom Tesfaye Situation in Numbers Reporting Period: May 2021 12.5 million Highlights children in need of humanitarian assistance (HNO 2021) In May, 56,354 new medical consultations were conducted in Afar, Somali and Tigray regions through the 79 UNICEF- supported Mobile Health and Nutrition Teams (MHNTs), 23.5 million 11,692 of these in Tigray through the 30 active MHNTs. people in need UNICEF reached 412,647 people in May and 2,881,630 (HNO 2021) people between January to May 2021 throughout Ethiopia with safe water for drinking, cooking, and personal hygiene 2 through the rehabilitation of non-functional water systems, 3.6 million water treatment, and water trucking; of these, 1,228,921 were internally displaced people (DTM, in Tigray 2021) Since the beginning of the Tigray crisis, UNICEF has delivered 2,352 metric tons of multi-sectoral supplies to nine 806,541 partners (including Regional Bureaus) working in the region, valued at US$ 4.6 million. registered refugees (UNHCR,31 May 2021) In May, UNICEF supported the treatment of 38,032 under 5 children with Severe Acutely Malnutrition (SAM) in Ethiopia (1,723 in Tigray); 40.6 per cent of these were in Oromia, 20.7 per cent in Somali, 15.4 percent in SNNP/Sidama, 12.7 percent in Amhara and 4.5 per cent in Tigray. A total of UNICEF Revised HAC Appeal 152,413 children in the country have been treated for SAM between January – April 2021 with UNICEF direct support 2021
    [Show full text]
  • From Dust to Dollar Gold Mining and Trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia Borderland
    From Dust to Dollar Gold mining and trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia borderland [Copy and paste completed cover here} Enrico Ille, Mohamed[Copy[Copy and and paste paste Salah completed completed andcover cover here} here} Tsegaye Birhanu image here, drop from 20p5 max height of box 42p0 From Dust to Dollar Gold mining and trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia borderland Enrico Ille, Mohamed Salah and Tsegaye Birhanu Cover image: Gold washers close to Qeissan, Sudan, 25 November 2019 © Mohamed Salah This report is a product of the X-Border Local Research Network, a component of the FCDO’s Cross- Border Conflict—Evidence, Policy and Trends (XCEPT) programme, funded by UKaid from the UK government. The programme carries out research work to better understand the causes and impacts of conflict in border areas and their international dimensions. It supports more effective policymaking and development programming and builds the skills of local partners. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official policies. The Rift Valley Institute works in Eastern and Central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. Copyright © Rift Valley Institute 2021. This work is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE REPORT 2 Contents Executive summary 5 1. Introduction 7 Methodology 9 2. The Blue Nile–Benishangul-Gumuz borderland 12 The two borderland states 12 The international border 14 3. Trade and mobility in the borderlands 16 The administration of trade relations 16 Constraints on mobility 18 Price differentials and borderland trade 20 Borderland relations 22 4.
    [Show full text]
  • S P E C I a L R E P O
    S P E C I A L R E P O R T FAO/WFP CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT MISSION TO ETHIOPIA (Phase 2) Integrating the Crop and Food Supply and the Emergency Food Security Assessments 27 July 2009 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, ROME WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME, ROME - 2 - This report has been prepared by Mario Zappacosta, Jonathan Pound and Prisca Kathuku, under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP Secretariats. It is based on information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned if further information is required. Henri Josserand Mustapha Darboe Deputy Director, GIEWS, FAO Regional Director for Southern, Eastern Fax: 0039-06-5705-4495 and Central Africa, WFP E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 0027-11-5171634 E-mail: : [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web (www.fao.org ) at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ The Special Alerts/Reports can also be received automatically by E-mail as soon as they are published, by subscribing to the GIEWS/Alerts report ListServ. To do so, please send an E-mail to the FAO-Mail-Server at the following address: [email protected] , leaving the subject blank, with the following message: subscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L To be deleted from the list, send the message: unsubscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L Please note that it is now possible to subscribe to regional lists to only receive Special Reports/Alerts by region: Africa, Asia, Europe or Latin America (GIEWSAlertsAfrica-L, GIEWSAlertsAsia-L, GIEWSAlertsEurope-L and GIEWSAlertsLA-L).
    [Show full text]
  • Original Research
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/star.v3i4.1 ISSN: 2226-7522(Print) and 2305-3372 (Online) Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J., Oct-Dec 2014, 3(4): 01-09 Journal Homepage: http://www.starjournal.org/ Original Research Correlation and Divergence Analysis for Phenotypic Traits in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes Gadisa Hika1, Negash Geleta2* and Zerihun Jaleta2 1Arjo Preparatory school, P.O. Box: 10, Arjo, East Wollega, Ethiopia 2Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Wollega University, P.O. Box: 395, Nekemte, Ethiopia Abstract Article Information A study was conducted to determine the magnitude of associations of traits and genetic Article History: divergence among the 64 sesame genotypes. The genotypes were arranged in 8 x 8 simple Received : 19-10-2014 lattice design and grown in Arjo district, Western Ethiopia during 2013 cropping season. Data were recorded for 12 phenotypic traits and analyzed using SAS software version 9.20 (2002, Revised : 21-12-2014 USA). The results showed that seed yield had positive and significant genotypic and Accepted : 27-12-2014 phenotypic correlations with all traits, indicating they are important yield components and can be used for yield improvement in sesame breeding program except for PH and BY. Further Keywords: analysis by path coefficient method indicated that at genotypic level DM, CFP and HI exerted Correlation high positive direct effects on seed yield and strong and positive correlation with seed yield. Divergence analysis Similarly, at phenotypic level positive and high direct effects were exerted by CFP, NPB and HI on seed yield and these traits had also strong positive associations with SY.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordination Meeting (Federal)
    Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordination Meeting (Federal) Date of Meeting April 09, 2021 Time 10:00 AM Minutes prepared by: Cluster Location Webinar chaired by Shelter Cluster Attendees IRC, SWAN, Samaritan's Purse, FIDO, DPO, People in Need (PIN), SCI, IOM, ANE, Dorcas Aid International, ASDEPO, NRC, IOM/RRF, SCA/HEKS-EPER, UNHCR, LWF, MCMDO, WVI, CRS, AIDRO, ZOA, FIDO, NDRMC, ADPC, Islamic Relief, ACAPS, USAID/BHA, CARE Agenda 1. Review of action points of previous meeting 2. Overall response and Pipeline update 3. The current humanitarian situation in country and expectation from ESNFI 4. ESNFI Situation Update and Response in Tigray 5. Emergency Response Mechanisms, how it works 6. HLP assessment in West Tigray Zone AOB 1st round of EHF Agenda and notes. Decisions, issues 1. Review of Action Action Point Further Action Point • Partners should communicate their planned activities to On-going the sub-national Cluster and the regional ECC before addressing the beneficiaries • Partners should report age/sex disaggregated data for On-going completed activities from the actual distribution list, not a calculation of beneficiaries using the average household size. On-going • Partners are encouraged to share sector-specific funding of the year 2021 to the FTS website. The cluster will share the FTS template with link On-going • Coordination with the sub-national Cluster highly encouraged for any response 2. Information Please refer to the Shelter Cluster Presentation for more detail Management Updates(Overall • Response - Overall: In the first quarter of 2021, the cluster through its partners reached response and 357,424 beneficiaries with ESNFI kits, NFI kits, cash for rent and construction of communal Pipeline update) and emergency shelters by considering females, children, and people with different vulnerability.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Journal of Ethnobiology and provided by PubMed Central Ethnomedicine BioMed Central Research Open Access Ethnomedical survey of Berta ethnic group Assosa Zone, Benishangul-Gumuz regional state, mid-west Ethiopia Teferi Flatie1, Teferi Gedif1, Kaleab Asres*2 and Tsige Gebre-Mariam1 Address: 1Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and 2Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Email: Teferi Flatie - [email protected]; Teferi Gedif - [email protected]; Kaleab Asres* - [email protected]; Tsige Gebre- Mariam - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 1 May 2009 Received: 17 June 2008 Accepted: 1 May 2009 Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2009, 5:14 doi:10.1186/1746-4269-5-14 This article is available from: http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/5/1/14 © 2009 Flatie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Traditional medicine (TM) has been a major source of health care in Ethiopia as in most developing countries around the world. This survey examined the extent and factors determining the use of TM and medicinal plants by Berta community. One thousand and two hundred households (HHs) and fourteen traditional healers were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaires and six focused group discussions (FGDs) were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report June – July 2019
    ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report June – July 2019 This report is produced by OCHA Ethiopia in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period June - July 2019. The next report will be issued around September - October 2019. OVERVIEW IUS • In June - July, Ethiopia experienced an at- TIGRAY 276 Access incidents reported tempted government overthrow in Amhara, Western socio-political unrest in Sidama (SNNPR), North Gondar Wag Hamra Central Gondar and a rise in security incidents in Southwest- Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu) AFAR ern Oromia and Gambella. The quality of ac- Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) cess declined, limiting assistance to people AMHARA No. o incidents by one South Wello Metekel in need, against a backdrop of massive gov- Oromia East Gojam BENISHANGUL Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) 4 13 35 49 AsosaGUMUZ Siti ernment-led returns of IDP to areas of origin. Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) North Shewa(O) North Shewa(A) Kemashi Dire Dawa urban West Wellega East Wellega DIRE DAWA West Shewa Fafan • Hostilities between Ethiopian Defense Forc- ADDIS ABABA Kelem Wellega East Hararge Finfine Special West Hararge es (EDF) and Unidentified Armed Groups Buno Bedele East Shewa Etang Special Ilu Aba Bora Jarar OROMIA Erer (UAGs) as well as inter-ethnic, remained the GAMBELA Jimma Agnewak main access obstacle, with 197 incidents Doolo Nogob West Arsi SOMALI (out of 276), mostly in Southwestern Oromia SNNP Sidama Bale Korahe (110). The Wellegas, West Guji (Oromia), and Gedeo Shabelle Gambella, were the most insecure areas for Segen Area P. West Guji Guji aid workers. Liban Borena • In June, conflict in the Wellegas scaled up, Daawa with explosive devices attacks causing ci- Source: Access Incidents database vilian casualties in urban centres.
    [Show full text]
  • From Dust to Dollar Gold Mining and Trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia Borderland
    From Dust to Dollar Gold mining and trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia borderland [Copy and paste completed cover here} Enrico Ille, Mohamed[Copy[Copy and and paste paste Salah completed completed andcover cover here} here} Tsegaye Birhanu image here, drop from 20p5 max height of box 42p0 From Dust to Dollar Gold mining and trade in the Sudan–Ethiopia borderland Enrico Ille, Mohamed Salah and Tsegaye Birhanu Cover image: Gold washers close to Qeissan, Sudan, 25 November 2019 © Mohamed Salah This report is a product of the X-Border Local Research Network, a component of the FCDO’s Cross-Border Conflict Evidence, Policy and Trends (XCEPT) programme, funded by UK aid from the UK government. XCEPT brings together leading experts to examine conflict-affected borderlands, how conflicts connect across borders, and the factors that shape violent and peaceful behaviour. The X-Border Local Research Network carries out research to better understand the causes and impacts of conflict in border areas and their international dimensions. It supports more effective policymaking and development programming and builds the skills of local partners. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official policies. The Rift Valley Institute works in Eastern and Central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. Copyright © Rift Valley Institute 2021. This work is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE REPORT 2 Contents Executive summary 5 1. Introduction 7 Methodology 9 2. The Blue Nile–Benishangul-Gumuz borderland 12 The two borderland states 12 The international border 14 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Land Deals to Livelihood Security and Natural Resource Management in Benshanguel Gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia by Maru Shete
    Implications of land deals to livelihood security and natural resource management in Benshanguel Gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia by Maru Shete Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing 6-8 April 2011 Organised by the Land Deals Politics Initiative (LDPI) in collaboration with the Journal of Peasant Studies and hosted by the Future Agricultures Consortium at the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex Implications of land deals to livelihood security and natural resource management in Benshanguel Gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia 1 (Draft not for citation) Maru Shete Future Agricultures Consortium Research Fellow, P.O.Box 50321, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Email: [email protected] Abstract The Federal Government of Ethiopia (FGE) is leasing out large tracts of arable lands both to domestic and foreign investors in different parts of the country where land is relatively abundant. While the FGE justifies that it is part of the country’s strategy to achieve food security objective, critics have been forwarded from different directions. This research aims at studying the implications of land deals to livelihood security and natural resource management in Benshanguel Gumuz Regional State. Exploratory study was done and data were collected through interviewing 150 farm households in two districts of the region. Key informants interview and focus group discussions were also held to generate required data. Primary data were complemented with secondary data sources. Preliminary findings suggest that there is weak linkage, monitoring and support of investment activities from federal, regional and district levels, weak capacity of domestic investors, accelerated degradation of forest resources, and threatened livelihood security of community members.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Data/Projections, 1999 & 2000
    Census data/Projections, 1999 & 2000 Jan - June and July - December Relief Bens., Supplementary Feeding Bens. TIGRAY Zone 1994 census 1999 beneficiaries - May '99 2000 beneficiaries - Jan 2000 July - Dec 2000 Bens Zone ID/prior Wereda Total Pop. 1999 Pop. 1999 Bens. 1999 bens % 2000 Pop. 2000 Bens 2000 bens Bens. Sup. July - Dec Bens July - Dec Bens ity Estimate of Pop. Estimate % of Pop. Feeding % of pop 1 ASEGEDE TSIMBELA 96,115 111,424 114,766 1 KAFTA HUMERA 48,690 56,445 58,138 1 LAELAY ADIYABO 79,832 92,547 5,590 6% 95,324 7,800 8% 11,300 12% Western 1 MEDEBAY ZANA 97,237 112,724 116,106 2,100 2% 4,180 4% 1 TAHTAY ADIYABO 80,934 93,825 6,420 7% 96,639 18,300 19% 24,047 25% 1 TAHTAY KORARO 83,492 96,790 99,694 2,800 3% 2,800 3% 1 TSEGEDE 59,846 69,378 71,459 1 TSILEMTI 97,630 113,180 37,990 34% 116,575 43,000 37% 15,050 46,074 40% 1 WELKAIT 90,186 104,550 107,687 Sub Total 733,962 850,863 50,000 6% 876,389 74,000 8% 15,050 88,401 10% *2 ABERGELE 58,373 67,670 11,480 17% 69,700 52,200 75% 18,270 67,430 97% *2 ADWA 109,203 126,596 9,940 8% 130,394 39,600 30% 13,860 58,600 45% 2 DEGUA TEMBEN 89,037 103,218 7,360 7% 106,315 34,000 32% 11,900 44,000 41% Central 2 ENTICHO 131,168 152,060 22,850 15% 156,621 82,300 53% 28,805 92,300 59% 2 KOLA TEMBEN 113,712 131,823 12,040 9% 135,778 62,700 46% 21,945 67,700 50% 2 LAELAY MAYCHEW 90,123 104,477 3,840 4% 107,612 19,600 18% 6,860 22,941 21% 2 MEREB LEHE 78,094 90,532 14,900 16% 93,248 57,500 62% 20,125 75,158 81% *2 NAEDER ADET 84,942 98,471 15,000 15% 101,425 40,800 40% 14,280 62,803 62% 2
    [Show full text]