DOCSLIB.ORG

1 `Anna Di Robilant Property and Deliberation. the Numerus Clausus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 `Anna Di Robilant Property and Deliberation. the Numerus Clausus `Anna di Robilant Property and Deliberation. The Numerus Clausus Principle, New Property Forms and New Property Values. draft Introduction The numerus clausus principle means that property law recognizes only a limited menu of mandatory forms. In the United States, first year law students spend significant time mastering the limited menu of estates in land. In France or in Italy, every first year student learns that the “real rights” are ownership, emphyteusis, superficies, real servitudes, the right of usufruct, the right of use and the right of habitation. The numerus clausus principle exists in both the civil law and the common law, but, comparative law scholars warn, its nature and scope differ. In the civil law, the numerus clausus is a rigid rule with a long historical pedigree. It has structured the property system since Roman law. It is either explicitly stated or implied in the civil code. The menu of recognized forms is a relatively short one, comprising less than ten items. It is also significantly stable, with few variations from Justinian to the present. By contrast, in the common law, the numerus clausus has attracted the attention of property scholars only recently. It is a more flexible rule of judicial self-governance. The menu is a richer one, comprising forms, such as the trust, that civil law scholars have long envied. The fact that the numerus clausus is a near universal feature of property systems has not made it less puzzling to private law scholars. Isn’t private law’s very function to provide individuals with flexible legal devices that allow them to reach any desired economic outcome?1 If flexibility and customization are what private law promises, then why do virtually all modern legal systems provide a restricted list of recognized forms? In recent years, property experts have proposed a variety of possible explanations for the numerus clausus principle. For some, it serves the purposes of preventing the excessive fragmentation of property entitlements, which would preclude, or make more difficult, the efficient productive use of valuable resources. For others, the function of the numerus clausus principle is to lower the information costs incurred by third parties who seek to acquire property rights or to avoid violating them. Still others suggest that the numerus clausus principle works as filter of the content of property forms, allowing the legislature and courts to deny the status of property rights (i.e. validity against the world) to forms that are at odds with contemporary values. This rich strand of recent numerus clausus scholarship has focused mostly on the common law, leaving undisputed the traditional view as to the rigidity and stability of the numerus clausus principle in the civil law. This article presents a new understanding of 1 See Bernard Rudden, Economic Theory v Property Law: The Numerus Clausus Problem, in OXFORD ESSAYS IN JURISPRUDENCE, JOHN EEKELAAR & JOHN BELL EDS (1987) 239-263 (at 239, “ the issue to be discussed is the apparent conflict between a modern economic theory of property rights and the law”). Law & economics antipathy for numerus clausus principle 1 the numerus clausus principle in civil law systems. It focuses on an aspect of the operation of the numerus clausus principle in the civil law that has received virtually no attention. If we look at the list of recognized property forms in a historical perspective, yet another numerus clausus puzzle emerges. Not only is the list dynamic, in the sense that new property forms are occasionally recognized, but we can observe an interesting type of dynamism.2 Property forms have been, first, eliminated from and, then, re- admitted to the list. The article examines two recent instances where an old form was re- introduced. The right of emphyteusis (a type of long lease) was a form widely used until the 17th century. It was dropped from the list of the 19th century civil codes and was recently legislatively re-introduced in France and in the Netherlands. Ownership of res communes omnium (ownership of commons) was a form recognized in Roman law and later dropped from 19th century civil codes. It is now being revived by French and Italian property lawyers and is the object of recent legislatives proposals. The article draws from these two recent episodes of dynamism in the list of recognized property forms two ideas. First, the numerus clausus operates in much the same way in the common law and the civil law. The numerus clausus is yet another instance where the alleged stark difference between common law property and civil law property has been largely overstated. In both systems, the numerus clausus is a flexible principle that allows for significant experimentalism in property law. But, in both systems, there are limits to this experimentalism. Because property rights are in rem, i.e. valid against the world, we want to limit the information costs incurred by third parties who seek to acquire rights or avoid violating them. And, because the in rem nature of property rights confers on them a “public” quality, we want to exercise some control over the content of property forms. Second, these recent instances in which an old property form was re-admitted into the standard list suggests something important about the emerging normative commitments of property law. The numerus clausus list tells us a great deal about the values we associate with property. But qualitative studies of the numers clausus list are still largely missing.3 In other words, there has been little investigation of what these values are and how they have changed over time. Moments of dynamism in the list of property forms tend to be moments of significant social and economic change, as well as change in private and public values. Property scholars and historians agree that the pruning and expansion of the property list that happened in the early 19th century, when modern industrial society was just taking shape, reflected the rejection of feudal hierarchies and the commitment to negative freedom and the free alienability of property in the market. But what do recent changes in the list suggest? Is there anything new in the plurality of clashing normative ideals we seek to pursue through property? I argue that emphyetusis and ownership of res communes omnium have been, or are in the process of being, re-admitted into the list because they have an important quality. In both, decisions over the use and management of resources that involve important public interests, such water, scarce urban land or cultural institutions, are made through a participatory 2 I borrow the term “dynamism” to describe changes in the list from Nestor M. Davidson, Standardization and Pluralism in Property Law, 61 VAND. L. REV. 1597 (2008). 3 with the exception of Joseph W. Singer, Democratic Estates: Property Law in a Free and Democratic Society, 94 CORNELL L. REV. 1009 (2008-2009)(focusing on changes in the list of property forms in the US over the course of the 20th century and on the rejection of feudal hierarchies.) 2 deliberative process. Both property forms have mechanisms of deliberative democracy built in. They suggest that decisions over certain resources should be made not by one private or public owner, but through a deliberative process open to all. 1. The “Numerus Clausus” principle in the civil law and the common law a. The conventional wisdom: the numerus clausus as a rigid design principle of civil law systems. The numerus clausus principle means that the legal system limits the creation of property rights by providing a fixed menu of standard property rights. The principle has two dimensions. First, it limits the number of property rights parties can create (Typenzwang). Second, it precludes customizing the content of the allowed property rights. Parties cannot freely shape the content of the allowed property rights but rather have to stick to legislatively predetermined terms (Typenfixierung). Comparative property scholars have long viewed the numerus clausus principle as one of the features marking a stark contrast between common law and civil law property.4 They suggest that, while the numerus clausus principle exists in both property systems, its nature and scope differ. First, the numerus clausus principle has a long pedigree in civil law systems but a relatively recent history in the common law. In civil law systems, the numerus clausus principle has been a near constant feature since Roman law.5 The numerus clausus principle was explicitly formulated for the first time in 19th century German property theory, but scholars have traced its presence back to Roman law, where it took the form of a numerus clausus of property actions.6 By contrast, in the common law, the numerus clausus principle has attracted significant scholarly attention only in relatively recent times.7 Comparative property scholars had long argued that the numerus clausus 4 FW. Frachter, INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF COMPARATIVE LAW (1973) vi ch 11, n 109 (arguing that civil law codes contain a rigid numerus clausus principle, an exclusive list of recognized real rights which prevents the recognition of the trust form); Others go even further and argue that the numerus clausus principle is known only to civil law systems and is a legacy of Roman law see RENE DAVID & th C.JAUFFRET-ESPINOSI, LES GRANDS SYSTEMES DE DROIT CONTEMPORAINE (10 ed. 1992) n 310. 5 BRAM AKKERMANS, THE PRINCIPLE OF NUMERUS CLAUSUS IN EUROPEAN PROPERTY LAW (2008) p 19-80 (tracing the history of the numerus clausus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Property and Democratic Deliberation: the Numerus Clausus Principle and Democratic Experimentalism in Property Law Anna Di Robilant Boston University School of Law
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship Spring 2014 Property and Democratic Deliberation: The Numerus Clausus Principle and Democratic Experimentalism in Property Law Anna di Robilant Boston University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Anna di Robilant, Property and Democratic Deliberation: The Numerus Clausus Principle and Democratic Experimentalism in Property Law, 62 American Journal of Comparative Law 367 (2014). Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/77 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROPERTY AND DEMOCRATIC DELIBERATION: THE NUMERUS CLAUSUS PRINCIPLE AND DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENTALISM IN PROPERTY LAW 62 American Journal of Comparative Law 301 (Issue 2 / Spring 2014) Boston University School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Paper No. 14-27 (June 19, 2014)) Anna di Robilant Boston University School of Laww This paper can be downloaded without charge at: http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/scholarship/workingpapers/2014.html Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2456658 \\jciprod01\productn\C\COM\62-2\COM203.txt unknown Seq: 1 18-FEB-14 8:34 ANNA DI ROBILANT* Property and Democratic Deliberation: The Numerus Clausus Principle and Democratic Experimentalism in Property Law† ABSTRACT First-year law students soon become familiar with the numerus clausus principle in property law.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Threshold of the Holocaust: Anti-Jewish Riots and Pogroms In
    Geschichte - Erinnerung – Politik 11 11 Geschichte - Erinnerung – Politik 11 Tomasz Szarota Tomasz Szarota Tomasz Szarota Szarota Tomasz On the Threshold of the Holocaust In the early months of the German occu- volume describes various characters On the Threshold pation during WWII, many of Europe’s and their stories, revealing some striking major cities witnessed anti-Jewish riots, similarities and telling differences, while anti-Semitic incidents, and even pogroms raising tantalising questions. of the Holocaust carried out by the local population. Who took part in these excesses, and what was their attitude towards the Germans? The Author Anti-Jewish Riots and Pogroms Were they guided or spontaneous? What Tomasz Szarota is Professor at the Insti- part did the Germans play in these events tute of History of the Polish Academy in Occupied Europe and how did they manipulate them for of Sciences and serves on the Advisory their own benefit? Delving into the source Board of the Museum of the Second Warsaw – Paris – The Hague – material for Warsaw, Paris, The Hague, World War in Gda´nsk. His special interest Amsterdam, Antwerp, and Kaunas, this comprises WWII, Nazi-occupied Poland, Amsterdam – Antwerp – Kaunas study is the first to take a comparative the resistance movement, and life in look at these questions. Looking closely Warsaw and other European cities under at events many would like to forget, the the German occupation. On the the Threshold of Holocaust ISBN 978-3-631-64048-7 GEP 11_264048_Szarota_AK_A5HC PLE edition new.indd 1 31.08.15 10:52 Geschichte - Erinnerung – Politik 11 11 Geschichte - Erinnerung – Politik 11 Tomasz Szarota Tomasz Szarota Tomasz Szarota Szarota Tomasz On the Threshold of the Holocaust In the early months of the German occu- volume describes various characters On the Threshold pation during WWII, many of Europe’s and their stories, revealing some striking major cities witnessed anti-Jewish riots, similarities and telling differences, while anti-Semitic incidents, and even pogroms raising tantalising questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Property
    THE LAW OF PROPERTY SUPPLEMENTAL READINGS Class 14 Professor Robert T. Farley, JD/LLM PROPERTY KEYED TO DUKEMINIER/KRIER/ALEXANDER/SCHILL SIXTH EDITION Calvin Massey Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law The Emanuel Lo,w Outlines Series /\SPEN PUBLISHERS 76 Ninth Avenue, New York, NY 10011 http://lawschool.aspenpublishers.com 29 CHAPTER 2 FREEHOLD ESTATES ChapterScope -------------------­ This chapter examines the freehold estates - the various ways in which people can own land. Here are the most important points in this chapter. ■ The various freehold estates are contemporary adaptations of medieval ideas about land owner­ ship. Past notions, even when no longer relevant, persist but ought not do so. ■ Estates are rights to present possession of land. An estate in land is a legal construct, something apart fromthe land itself. Estates are abstract, figments of our legal imagination; land is real and tangible. An estate can, and does, travel from person to person, or change its nature or duration, while the landjust sits there, spinning calmly through space. ■ The fee simple absolute is the most important estate. The feesimple absolute is what we normally think of when we think of ownership. A fee simple absolute is capable of enduringforever though, obviously, no single owner of it will last so long. ■ Other estates endure for a lesser time than forever; they are either capable of expiring sooner or will definitely do so. ■ The life estate is a right to possession forthe life of some living person, usually (but not always) the owner of the life estate. It is sure to expire because none of us lives forever.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Shared Historical Memory in Israeli and Polish Education Systems. Issues and Trends
    Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas. Pedagogika, ss. 273-293 Oryginalny artykuł naukowy Original article Data wpływu/Received: 16.02.2019 Data recenzji/Accepted: 26.04.2019 Data publikacji/Published: 10.06.2019 Źródła finansowania publikacji: Ariel University DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.2311 Authors’ Contribution: (A) Study Design (projekt badania) (B) Data Collection (zbieranie danych) (C) Statistical Analysis (analiza statystyczna) (D) Data Interpretation (interpretacja danych) (E) Manuscript Preparation (redagowanie opracowania) (F) Literature Search (badania literaturowe) Nitza Davidovitch* Eyal Levin** THE ROLE OF SHARED HISTORICAL MEMORY IN ISRAELI AND POLISH EDUCATION SYSTEMS. ISSUES AND TRENDS INTRODUCTION n February 1, 2018, despite Israeli and American criticism, Poland’s Sen- Oate approved a highly controversial bill that bans any Holocaust accusations against Poles as well as descriptions of Nazi death camps as Polish. The law essentially bans accusations that some Poles were complicit in the Nazi crimes committed on Polish soil, including the Auschwitz-Birkenau extermination camp. Once the leg- islation was signed into law, about a fortnight later, by Polish President Andrzej Duda, anyone convicted under the law could face fines or up to three years in jail. Critics of the bill, including the US State Department and Israeli officials, feared that it would infringe upon free speech and could even be used to target Holocaust survivors or historians. In Israel, the reaction was fierce. “One cannot change history, * ORCID: 0000-0001-7273-903X. Ariel University in Izrael. ** ORCID: 0000-0001-5461-6634. Ariel University in Izrael. ZN_20_2019_POL.indb 273 05.06.2019 14:08:14 274 Nitza Davidovitch, Eyal Levin and the Holocaust cannot be denied,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: the Numerus Clausus Principle
    Article Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle Thomas W. Merrill, and Henry E. Smith" CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 3 II. THE NUMERUS CLAUSUS IN THE COMMON LAW OF PROPERTY .............. 9 A. The Numerus Clausus as a Norm of JudicialSelf-Governance ....... 9 B. The Common Law's Standardizationof Property....................... 12 1. Estates in Land ................................................................... 12 2. ConcurrentInterests ........................................................... 14 3. Nonpossessory Interests....................................................... 16 4. Interests in PersonalProperty ............................................ 17 5. Intellectual Property........................................................... 19 C. JudicialRecognition of the Numerus Clausus ........................... 20 D . Sum m ary..................................................................................... 23 t John Paul Stevens Professor of Law, Northwestern University. t" Associate Professor of Law, Northwestern University. The authors would like to thank Charlotte Crane, Bob Ellickson, Richard Epstein, Clay Gillette, David Haddock, Henry Hansmann, Michael Heller, Jim Krier, John Langbein, Richard McAdams, Fred McChesney, Eric Posner, Eric Rasmusen, Carol Rose, Bob Scott, Marshall Shapo, Dick Speidel, Jim Speta, Debra Stark, and the participants at a Northwestern faculty workshop and at the 2000 annual
    [Show full text]
  • Peregrination in the Age of the Numerus Clausus: Hungarian
    DOI: 10.14754/CEU.2019.10 PEREGRINATION IN THE AGE OF THE NUMERUS CLAUSUS: HUNGARIAN JEWISH STUDENTS IN INTERWAR EUROPE Ágnes Katalin Kelemen A DISSERTATION In History Presented to the Faculties of the Central European University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Budapest, Hungary 2019 Supervisors Victor Karády CEU eTD Collection Michael Laurence Miller DOI: 10.14754/CEU.2019.10 Copyright in the text of this dissertation rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European University Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. I hereby declare that this dissertation contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions and no materials previously written and/or published by another person unless otherwise noted. CEU eTD Collection II DOI: 10.14754/CEU.2019.10 Abstract This dissertation investigates the dynamics between academic antisemitism, Jewish social mobility and Jewish migration through the case study of the “numerus clausus exiles” – as Jewish students who left interwar Hungary due to the antisemitic numerus clausus law (Law XXV of 1920) were called by contemporaries and historians. After a conceptual and historiographic introduction in the first chapter embedding this work in the contexts of Jewish studies, social history and exile studies; interwar Hungarian Jewish peregrination is examined from four different aspects in four chapters based on four different types of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Evaluating Recreational Easements-New Norms for the Twenty-First
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Pascoe, Susan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8618-2842 (2019) Re-evaluating recreational easements- new norms for the twenty-first century? In: Modern Studies in Property Law. McFarlane, Ben and Agnew, Sinéad, eds. Modern Studies in Property Law, 10 . Hart Publishing, pp. 167-186. ISBN 9781509921379, e-ISBN 9781509921409, e-ISBN 9781509921393, e-ISBN 9781509921386. [Book Section] (doi:10.5040/9781509921409.ch-010) Final accepted version (with author’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/25568/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis Rosenberg and the Origins of the Socio-Demographic Study of Jews in Canada
    Louis Rosenberg and the Origins of the Socio-Demographic Study of Jews in Canada Morton Wemfeld. * Louis Rosenberg's Canada's Jews: A Social and Economic Study of the Jews in Canada, published in 1939, was a pioneering if unfortunately neglected classic of Canadian ethnic demography and sociology. Its republication in a new edition in 1993, by McGill-Queen's Press, has particular relevance for the community of social scientists devoted to the study of Diaspora Jewish communities, using socio­ demographic data. Canada's Jews has persisting value as a superb quantitative social history of Canadian Jews in the 1930s. It also is in many ways an unmatched prototype of a study of the ethnic demography of any Canadian minority group. Louis Rosenberg's work was a product of his personal biography, the current socio-political context, and the customs and norms of his discipline. This is the case for those carrying on his work. What follows is a brief and far from exhaustive treatment of the man, the times, and the work. The Man Louis Rosenberg was born in Gonenz, Poland, in 1893. His family was shaped by traditional and secular elements of Jewish culture in Eastern Europe at the turn of the century. When he was three his parents emigrated to England from Lithuania, settling in Leeds, Yorkshire, which had at the time an estimated 12,000 Jews. (Rosenberg, 1968). While his parents spoke Yiddish at home, Rosenberg's language of choice was English; he learned to speak Yiddish fluently only after arriving in Canada. Rosenberg graduated from elementary school in Leeds, won a scholarship for secondary school, and later a scholarship tenable at Leeds University.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary and the Holocaust Confrontation with the Past
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Hungary and the Holocaust Confrontation with the Past Symposium Proceedings W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Hungary and the Holocaust Confrontation with the Past Symposium Proceedings CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2001 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Third printing, March 2004 Copyright © 2001 by Rabbi Laszlo Berkowits, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Randolph L. Braham, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Tim Cole, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by István Deák, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Eva Hevesi Ehrlich, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Charles Fenyvesi; Copyright © 2001 by Paul Hanebrink, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Albert Lichtmann, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by George S. Pick, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum In Charles Fenyvesi's contribution “The World that Was Lost,” four stanzas from Czeslaw Milosz's poem “Dedication” are reprinted with the permission of the author. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Nestor Davidson Standardization
    DRAFT: PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE WITHOUT AUTHOR’S PERMISSION (BUT ALL COMMENTS ARE WELCOME) STANDARDIZATION AND PLURALISM IN PROPERTY LAW Nestor Davidson Standardization in property law—the near universal tendency of property interests to be found in a limited list of mandatory forms—poses an intriguing puzzle for property theory. If property law is meant to bolster autonomy and enhance the efficiency that private ordering can bring to economic relations, then how to account for a persistent feature of the law that seems consistently to undermine these goals? A number of scholars have attempted to tackle this problem in recent years. Some have focused on what might actually be efficiency enhancing about standardization. Others have argued that standardization instead reflects inherent categories of social or external meaning. These accounts, however, are ultimately limited. Efficiency theories overemphasize the structure of standardization with little interest in the content of the forms, while explanations focused on content fail to account for the persistence of the underlying structure of standardization in disparate legal systems. This Article proposes a theory of standardization in property law that focuses on the particular patterns of pluralism inherent in the standard forms. This pluralism brings to the fore the essentially regulatory function that the standard forms play. Even as standardization remains a consistent feature of property law, legal systems constantly tinker with the standard list and with the mandatory content of the forms themselves. This process produces a menagerie of forms that set the ex ante conditions under which property can be held while leaving a range of choice to private ordering as a matter of regulatory design.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principle of Numerus Clausus in European Property Law
    The Principle of Numerus Clausus in European Property Law Ius Commune Europaeum Bram Akkermans PhD-thesis The Principle of Numerus Clausus in European Property Law ISBN-13: 978-90-5095-824-0 D/2008/7849/65 NUR 822 © 2008 Intersentia Antwerp – Oxford – Portland www.intersentia.com No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photo copy, micro- film or any other means, without written permission from the author. PREFACE It is a great joy to finish a project after having worked on it for a period of four years. The work in this book is the result of research on my Ph.D. thesis at the Faculty of Law of Maastricht University, undertaken in the period from February 2004 until December 2007. During my research I have had the honour and pleasure to discuss my work with various property law and comparative law experts across the world. Some of them deserve a special word of thanks. First and foremost I owe gratitude to my supervisor Prof. dr. Sjef van Erp. Few in the world are patient enough to sit and listen to a beginning researcher and always make time to think and reflect with him. Many thanks for opening his incredible network for me. In the past years I have very much enjoyed working together, a cooperation I hope to continue for many more years. Second, the members of the Ius Commune Casebook Team on Property law must be mentioned. William Swadling of Brasenose College, Oxford University, for hosting me, both in the early as well as in the more advanced stages of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • One Thousand Years of the Polish Jewish Experience
    PREPARED BY One Thousand Years of the Polish Jewish Experience I. Jewish Settlement: 10th – 15th centuries 960-965 A Jewish merchant from Spain, Ibrahim IbnYaqub (Abraham benYaakov), travels to Arthur Szyk,“Visual History th th of Poland,” NewYork,1946.” Poland and writes the first description of the country. During the 10 and 11 centuries, Jewish merchants and artisans settle in Poland, where they are granted asylum from the persecution of the Crusades. First Jewish merchants referred to as Radhanites. 1097-1098 Jews banished from Prague, Bohemia and Germany settle in Silesia. 1100s Post-crusade migrations continue to Poland 1206 First Polish coins minted, with Hebrew inscriptions 1264 Statute of Kalisz issued by Boleslaus the Pious, Duke of Kalisz.The Statute establishes The General Charter of Jewish Liberties in Poland, which becomes a legal foundation of Jewish presence in Poland. 1273-1295 Statute of Kalisz privileges Turn of the 13th and 14th centuries marks the extended to Silesian Jews. end of feudal disintegration in Poland. New Polish 1267 Catholic backlash creates segregated rulers encourage Jewish migration to Poland. Jewish quarters through the Council of The 14th century also saw anti-Jewish riots in Silesia, which reached a climax during the Black Arthur Szyk,“Samuel Wroclaw, Jews ordered to wear special Anointing Saul,” New emblems, and banned them from holding Death, for which Jews were falsely blamed. Canaan, 1947. public offices higher than Christians. 1349 Pogroms in Silesia result in Jewish migration to Poland. 1310-1370 King Kazimierz (Casmir the Great) Wielki extends Jewish secular and the Statute of Kalisz (in 1334), and broadens Jewish privileges religious culture thrives.
    [Show full text]