DOCSLIB.ORG

The Route and Purpose of Champlain's Journey to the Petun in 1616

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Document généré le 24 sept. 2021 08:18 Ontario History The Route and Purpose of Champlain’s Journey to the Petun in 1616 Charles Garrad Volume 107, numéro 2, fall 2015 Résumé de l'article Dans cet essai, nous revisitons l’expédition entreprise par Samuel de URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1050633ar Champlain, lors de laquelle il rencontra les Odawas, les Petuns, ainsi que des DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1050633ar délégations de Neutres qui se trouvaient dans la région. Tout en confirmant les conclusions déjà établies, nous émettons de nouvelles hypothèses sur les Aller au sommaire du numéro raisons pourquoi la poursuite de la route qui conduirait vers les Neutres et ensuite vers l’Orient n’a pas eu lieu.. Éditeur(s) The Ontario Historical Society ISSN 0030-2953 (imprimé) 2371-4654 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Garrad, C. (2015). The Route and Purpose of Champlain’s Journey to the Petun in 1616. Ontario History, 107(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.7202/1050633ar Copyright © The Ontario Historical Society, 2015 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ 59 The Route and Purpose of Champlain’s Journey to the Petun in 1616 by Charles Garrad Intended for the celebration of Champlain’s 400th anniversary in 2015-2016 Introduction ong before Champlain was born, the belief was established in Eu- rope that the New World was part Lof a fabled and wealthy Asia. In 1524, an expedition commissioned by the king of Abstract The route1 taken by Samuel de Champlain and France, Francis 1, was undertaken spe- party in 1616, during which he encountered cifically to “discover a western passage to Cheveux-relevés-Odawa and Petun-Wyandot Cathay.”2 Ten years later, Jacques Cartier peoples, and also some visiting Neutrals, is again considered. Previous conclusions are confirmed. explored the Gulf of the St. Lawrence riv- That Champlain’s purpose was to proceed to er with the same purpose. He returned in the Neutrals, and possibly further to China, 1535 and entered the St. Lawrence river. and his reasons for not doing so, are suggested. “Here, at last, concluded Cartier, was the Résumé: Dans cet essai, nous revisitons passage he was seeking.” On his return to l’expédition entreprise par Samuel de Champlain, France, Cartier speculated to the King lors de laquelle il rencontra les Odawas, les Pe- that the river “might lead to Asia.”3 It was tuns, ainsi que des délégations de Neutres qui se trouvaient dans la région. Tout en confirmant les therefore likely that long before Cham- conclusions déjà établies, nous émettons de nouv- plain himself reached the St. Lawrence elles hypothèses sur les raisons pourquoi la pour- he “allowed himself to be persuaded that suite de la route qui conduirait vers les Neutres et the Asian Sea was not far away.”4 ensuite vers l’Orient n’a pas eu lieu.. 1 Map 1 is adapted from Champlain’s 1632 map Carte de le Nouvelle France, amended to show areas of contrasting accuracy, as indicating where Champlain was and where he was not. Both Maps 1 and 2 are taken from Charles Garrad, Champlain and the Petun, Research Bulletin 13, December 1997 (Toronto: Petun Research Institute, 1997) . <www.wyandot.org/petun>. 2 JR = Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents 1896-1901 (hereafter JR), ed. Reuben G. Thwaites, 73 volumes, (Cleveland: The Burrows Brothers Company, Publishers), 3: 291-92, note 5. 3 Marcel Trudel, “Cartier, Jacques,” Dictionary of Canadian Biography, Vol. 1 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1966), 165-172, 167, 168. 4 Marcel Trudel, “Champlain, Samuel de,” Dictionary of Canadian Biography, Vol. 1 (Toronto: Uni- Ontario History / Volume CVII, No. 2 / Autumn 2015 OH autumn 2015.indd 159 08/09/2015 10:21:04 PM 60 ONTARIO HISTORY Map 1 - Part of Cham- plain’s “Carte de la Nouv- elle France” 1632, showing the contrasts in accuracy as indicating where he actu- ally visited and where he did not. Champlain’s Mandate and the The Commission was the result of Cham- plain’s lobbying, so it is possible that its Route to China wording was actually Champlain’s own, n 1612, the year that Henri de Bour- and reflected what Champlain thought Ibon, the Prince de Condé, was ap- he was most likely to be able to achieve at pointed the Viceroy of New France, that time. To find Indian tribes and ally Champlain received a mandate by Royal and establish trade with them was diffi- Commission: cult enough. To find the way to China by to bring into subjection, submission and exploring the St. Lawrence and the rivers full obedience all the people of the said which flowed into it would prove impos- land (New France), to trade and traffic ami- ably and peacefully, to have carried out... sible, but his mandate of 1612 gave him discoveries and reconnaissance of the said the task of finding it. After four fruitless lands and notably from the said place called years, and certainly at some point, he Quebec... to extend upwards from this place, might have begun to doubt that China in the interior of the lands and rivers which was to be reached through New France. discharge into the said Saint Lawrence river, to try to find the easy route to pass through It is possible that Champlain reached the said country to the country of China and this point during his visit to the Petun the East Indies.5 Country in early 1616 and, after conver- versity of Toronto Press, 1966), 186-199, 188. 5 Samuel de Champlain, The Works of Samuel de Champlain,” 6 volumes and a portfolio of maps, (To- ronto: The Champlain Society, 1922-1936), 1925 2: 241-47; Cornelius J. Jaenen (ed.),The French Regime in the Upper Canada Country of Canada during the Seventeenth Century (Toronto: The Champlain Soci- ety, 1996), 54-56; Trudel, Histoire, 1186. OH autumn 2015.indd 160 08/09/2015 10:21:05 PM CHAMPLAIN’S JOURNEY TO THE PETUN 6 Map 2 - Champlain’s Route through the Gens de Petun in 1616? sations with Neutral visitors there (whose country he had intended to visit next after the Petun), he then intended to proceed further, perhaps with their help. Certain- ly at some point his objective of reaching China, or at least the route to it, “seems to have inter- ested Champlain less and less, or else he no longer had the lei- sure to concern himself with it.”6 Champlain then adopted a policy of heavily emphasising in detail his successes in other fields, such as exploration, promoting trade, alliances and warfare, and finding reasons not to pursue the task of finding China. However, if this is true it has yet to be explained why Cham- plain continued in later years to promote the idea he could reach China, or at least Asia. In Febru- were repeated in 1621. A revised mandate ary 1618 he assured the King “that by way of 1625 simply “encouraged him to look of New France one could easily reach the for the route to China.” Finally the same Kingdom of China and the East Indies” arguments were again presented in 1630 specifically “by way of the river St. Law- when the King Louis XIII began lobby- rence... which... issues from a lake , from ing for the restoration of New France fol- which flows a river that empties into the lowing the Kirke brothers’ occupation.8 said South Sea.” He was careful to avoid Given that after 1616 the possibility of being held responsible for this informa- his reaching China and its unbounded tion by stating it was “according to the riches was always advanced under ex- account given... by a number of people” treme conditions when he had nothing from “divers peoples and nations,” whom to lose, and he could always blame the he had discovered..7 The same arguments aboriginal people for misinforming him, 6 Trudel, “Champlain, Samuel de,” 186-199, 195. 7 Champlain, Works, 2: 326, 330. 8 Trudel, “Champlain, Samuel de,” 186-199, 196. OH autumn 2015.indd 161 08/09/2015 10:21:07 PM 62 ONTARIO HISTORY Champlain felt confident in continuing found that the Father was planning to to associate himself with the possibility visit the neighbouring Petun, as he had of finding the route to China even if he also “thought of doing.”11 Such a journey had privately developed doubts. His pro- would be entirely within his mandate. posal that the “river St. Lawrence... issues They, presumably with other Frenchmen from a lake, from which flows a river that who were not mentioned in the 1619 empties into the said South Sea” may par- text, set off from Huronia together and tially explain why a river which is shown reached the Petun Country in two days. on his 1616 map as having no particu- There he again met the band of Odawa lar significance appears in his 1632 map (Ottawa) he had previously encountered hugely enlarged and labelled “Grande on the French River,12 whom he had nick- riviere qui vient du midy” (Big river that named the Cheveux-relevés, into whose comes from the south) even though it winter territory the Petun had moved, flows in the wrong direction, and it, and and also some visiting Neutrals.
Recommended publications
  • Green Door #3

    Green Door #3

    The Green Door Citizens Supporting Ontario's Prosperous and Sustainable Future The Yorklands Green Hub Newsletter | April 2015 | No. 3 Greetings from the YGH Board We see YGH as part of the change- making. We have been assured that if GREAT NEWS: we can show enough public support for Yorklands Green Hub it will OUR FIRST happen. YOUR support is therefore critical to the Yorklands Green A.G.M.! Hub. Food and water security as The Yorklands Green Hub community health concerns, and will be holding its first sustainable urban agriculture (as The Superintendent's house Annual General Meeting on outlined in the Ontario Local Food Thursday, April 23rd at Act) will be central to our focus and We have important news to share with Innovation Guelph research. our supporters and members! 111 Farquhar St. Our renewable energy demon- Last fall we were informed by the strations will be the third pillar of our 7:00 PM Ministry of Infrastructure Ontario that outreach. Lifestyle changes are the Yorklands Green Hub lands and coming, and achieving carbon buildings will not be for lease, but BECOME A MEMBER TODAY! neutrality in our municipalities is a will only be for sale. We are now key overall goal. fundraising to purchase the Super- YGH is now a The “adaptive reuse” and “signifi- intendent's house and approximately membership cant natural area” designations on our 47 acres of the former Guelph organization. chosen site are important for us. Correctional Centre heritage site. This is a huge step for YGH, but one which will give us a more secure footing for We need a strong membership our eco-centre for the public good.
  • Glendale Solar Project Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment October, 2011

    Glendale Solar Project Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment October, 2011

    Glendale Solar Project Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment October, 2011 Disclaimer This report has been prepared by or on behalf of Northland Power Inc. for submission to the Ontario Ministry of the Environment as part of the Renewable Energy Approval process. The content of this report is not intended for the use of, nor is it intended to be relied upon by, any other person. Neither Northland Power Inc. nor any of its directors, officers, employees, agents or consultants has any liability whatsoever for any loss, damage or injury suffered by any third party arising out of, or in connection with, their use of this report. Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment Glendale Solar Project (FIT –FAH1BFV) Township of South Glengarry United Counties of Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry Prepared for Hatch Ltd. 4342 Queen Street, Suite 500, Niagara Falls, ON, L2E 7J7 Tel: (905) 374-0701 ext. 5313 Fax: (905) 374-1157 & The Ontario Ministry of Tourism and Culture By P. Hoskins, B.A. and T. Stilling, M.A. Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. 97 Gatewood Road, Kitchener, ON N2M 4E3 Tel: (519) 835-4427 Fax: (519) 954-4797 Reviewed by P.J. Racher, M.A. CAHP Ontario Ministry of Tourism and Culture Licence# P-007 Project # P007-245 PIF# P007-245-2010 August 2010 Revised January 2011 Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment, Glendale Solar Project (FIT – FAH1BFV), South Glengarry Township, Ontario. ii ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Location
  • Feasibility Study on a Potential Susquehanna Connector Trail for the John Smith Historic Trail

    Feasibility Study on a Potential Susquehanna Connector Trail for the John Smith Historic Trail

    Feasibility Study on a Potential Susquehanna Connector Trail for the John Smith Historic Trail Prepared for The Friends of the John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail November 16, 2009 Coordinated by The Bucknell University Environmental Center’sNature and Human Communities Initiative The Susquehanna Colloquium for Nature and Human Communities The Susquehanna River Heartland Coalition for Environmental Studies In partnership with Bucknell University The Eastern Delaware Nations The Haudenosaunee Confederacy The Susquehanna Greenway Partnership Pennsylvania Environmental Council Funded by the Conservation Fund/R.K. Mellon Foundation 2 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Recommended Susquehanna River Connecting Trail................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 6 Staff ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Criteria used for Study................................................................................................................. 6 2. Description of Study Area, Team Areas, and Smith Map Analysis ...................................... 8 a. Master Map of Sites and Trails from Smith Era in Study Area........................................... 8 b. Study
  • Huron-Wendat and Anthropological Perspectives

    Huron-Wendat and Anthropological Perspectives

    6 Ontario Archaeology No. 96, 2016 Understanding Ethnicity and Cultural Affiliation: Huron-Wendat and Anthropological Perspectives Mariane Gaudreau and Louis Lesage It is a well-known fact that archaeological cultures constructed by archaeologists do not always overlap with actual past ethnic groups. This is the case with the St. Lawrence Iroquoians of the Northeast. Up until re- cently, conventional narratives viewed this group as distinct from all other historic Iroquoian populations. However, the Huron-Wendat and the Mohawk consider themselves to be their direct descendants. Our paper is an attempt to reconcile oral history and archaeological interpretations by suggesting that part of the dis- parity between Huron-Wendat and archaeological conceptions of the group identity of the St. Lawrence Iro- quoians lies in differential understandings of the very nature of ethnicity by each party. Introduction For more than a century now, archaeologists have Indigenous peoples’ own conceptions of sought to establish correlates between material themselves and of their ancestors—or even with culture and ethnic groups (see Trigger 2006). ancient peoples’ conceptions of group identity, Unlike cultural anthropologists, who can access which sometimes contribute to alienate the emic perspectives on contemporary group communities from their past (e.g., Warburton and identity, archaeologists are often limited to Begay 2005; see also Voss 2015:659, 665). These extrapolating ethnicity from the material culture broader issues have engendered much discussion
  • Waterdown Village Historic Context Statement, Draft

    Waterdown Village Historic Context Statement, Draft

    Historic Context Statement Draft – August 2020 Waterdown Village Historic Context Statement The Village of Waterdown, incorporated in 1878, is a significant historic settlement area in the community of Flamborough in the City of Hamilton. Located in the former Township of East Flamborough, Waterdown’s early Euro-Canadian settlement was influenced by the construction of the military road, known as Dundas Street, and the area’s natural topography. The area now known as Waterdown was first developed in the early-nineteenth century as a thriving industrial and agricultural area. It functioned as an important transportation centre for the flow of people and goods by providing a gentle route up the Escarpment, acting as a hub for early stage coach routes and connecting to water transport at Brown’s Wharf (now LaSalle Park in the City of Burlington). The village continues to play an important role in the interconnected Greater Toronto Hamilton Area, resulting in significant volumes of pass-through traffic. Though many of Waterdown’s residents no longer work in the village, many of the commercial, residential industrial and institutional buildings on which the village was founded remain, as does its historic character and charm. Village residents have continued to demonstrate their commitment and interest in conserving their collective history through the adaptive reuse and preservation of historic structures, an active and involved historical society and local heritage advocacy group, and the creation of the heritage conservation district in
  • Indexes to Petun-Wyandot References in the Jesuit Relations

    Indexes to Petun-Wyandot References in the Jesuit Relations

    INDEXES TO PETUN-WYANDOT REFERENCES IN THE JESUIT RELATIONS compiled by Charles Garrad INTRODUCTION: The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents published between 1896 and 1901 in seventy-three volumes by The Burrows Brothers Company, edited by Reuben Gold Thwaites, contain many references to the Petun (Wyandot) in the seventeenth century, both by original contemporary observers, and as added editorial introduction and explanatory endnotes. The following text is intended to be a finding aid to Petun references. In the first section, references are noted by volume, and in the second section by subject. It is not always possible to identify post-Dispersal Petuns as such. Petun captives among the Iroquois after 1650 (the earlist known being taken at St. Jean in December 1649) are usually referred to as Hurons. When `Hurons' are clearly Petuns, as in the far west after 1652, the text use of Huron may be changed to Petun, allowing the term Huron to apply to those Wyandots who went to Quebec. Some original spellings and grammatical eccentricities are retained in quotations (which may not be indicated as such), others are anglicised through Spell-Check, or to conform to current Canadian usage (e.g. Odawa for Ottawa, Outaouatac, etc.). Other minor modifications occur. REFERENCES BY VOLUME PETUN REFERENCES IN JR1: located south-west of Hurons 1:21-22; cultivate tobacco 1:22; barter with other tribes 1:22; Charles Garnier & Isaac Jogues go to Petuns 1:24; Hurons flee to Petuns 1:26; Charles Garnier and Noel Chabanel killed 1:26, Louis Honare,enhak (not named) 1:26; presence of Jesuits a curse 1:26; Jesuits 1:26; Petuns destroyed by Iroquois 1:27; Iroquois 1:27; tattooing 1:279; St.
  • Articles the Spectre in the Archive: Truth, Reconciliation, and Indigenous Archival Memory J.J

    Articles the Spectre in the Archive: Truth, Reconciliation, and Indigenous Archival Memory J.J

    Articles The Spectre in the Archive: Truth, Reconciliation, and Indigenous Archival Memory J.J. GHADDAR RÉSUMÉ Cet article place la science archivistique en dialogue avec les études autochtones et les théories raciales critiques afin d’explorer deux cas de cour liés aux documents d’archives et à la Commission de vérité et réconciliation au Canada. Il examine sur quelle base la cour pouvait conclure que certains documents devaient être produits, d’autres conservés de façon temporaire, et d’autres encore, détruits. En tenant compte des études récentes qui préconisent un changement de la rhétorique au sujet des droits humains et de la diversité dans le discours archivistique, je soutiens que la disparition discursive ou la « spectralisation » des peuples autochtones joue un rôle crucial dans le processus de dépossession de leurs terres, de leurs ressources et de leur héritage culturel. En prenant note des tensions qui existent entre le désir d’être inscrit dans la mémoire et l’envie d’être oublié, j’affirme que l’incorporation de docu- ments créés par des peuples autochtones ou à leur sujet dans les archives nationales du colonisateur demeure cruciale à la constitution de la mémoire historique archivis- tique de ce dernier (au détriment d’une mémoire historique archivistique autochtone), qui transforme la honte et la culpabilité nationales canadiennes en gloire et honneur nationaux. En conceptualisant le centre d’archives national canadien comme un lieu hanté par la crainte et le désir, et par la culpabilité et le triomphe nationaux, je montre comment les cas de cour de la Commission de vérité et réconciliation révèlent ou mettent en évidence les histoires de violence coloniale.
  • Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing

    Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing

    Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing The Aboriginal Healing Foundation Research Series © 2004 Aboriginal Healing Foundation Published by: Aboriginal Healing Foundation 75 Albert Street, Suite 801, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5E7 Phone: (613) 237-4441 Toll-free: (888) 725-8886 Fax: (613) 237-4442 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ahf.ca Design & Production: Aboriginal Healing Foundation Printed by: Anishinabe Printing (Kitigan-Zibi) ISBN 0-9733976-9-1 Unauthorized use of the name “Aboriginal Healing Foundation” and of the Foundation’s logo is prohibited. Non-commercial reproduction of this document is, however, encouraged. Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Table of Contents Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing Prepared for The Aboriginal Healing Foundation by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D. This project was funded by the Aboriginal Healing Foundation (AHF) but the views expressed in this report are the personal views of the author(s). 2004 Table of Contents Table of Contents Definitions---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i Executive Summary --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 The Scope of the Study ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Historical Background --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11
  • THE GROWTH of BRITISH INFLUENCE AMONG the SENECA to 1768 John R

    THE GROWTH of BRITISH INFLUENCE AMONG the SENECA to 1768 John R

    THE GROWTH OF BRITISH INFLUENCE AMONG THE SENECA TO 1768 John R. Sahli eighteenth century saw the British gain the trade and political advantages formerly held by the French over the powerful Seneca Thein what is now western New York. The strategic position of Niagara in French hands, the influence of Chabert de Joncaire, 1 and the distance between the Seneca nation and the centers of British in- fluence were removed by the French and Indian War. At its end the possession of Niagara, the influence of Sir William Johnson, 2 and the aroused Indian anger against the westward expansion of the Americans gave the British those advantages formerly held by the French. The unhampered British position enabled them to increase their influence and the Seneca finally entered the Revolution against the Americans. To understand the reasons for this change-over, one must recog- nize the factors responsible for the French influence and the methods used by the British in winning the loyalty of the Seneca. This analysis must begin with the French occupation of the Seneca country. The Spread of French Influence among the Seneca In the latter part of the seventeenth century, the Iroquois Con- federacy, in an imperialistic struggle for the rich fur trade that gave itnot only a commodity that insured it desirable trade advantages with Dr. Sahli is professor of—Social Science at Indiana University of Pennsyl- vania, Indiana, Pennsylvania. Ed. 1 Louis Thomas de Joncaire, seigneur of Chabert, commandant at Niagara, 1720-30, came to Canada in 1687 and was shortly afterwards taken prisoner by the Seneca.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    THE WINDSOR BORDER REGION INTRODUCTION A. VISITORS BEFORE 1700 THIS historical survey is intended to serve as an introduction to a series of documents relating to the exploration and settlement of Canada's southernmost frontier. A glance at the map of Canada suffices to locate that frontier-the Detroit River region.1 At 42° latitude the eye quickly focuses on a 20-by-30-mile rectangular peninsula whose south, west, and north shores are washed by the waters of Lake Erie, the Detroit River, and Lake St. Clair respec- tively. Today this peninsula is Essex County in the Province of Ontario. Local Chambers of Commerce refer to it as the Sun Parlour of Canada. A recent book which records the development of the county and its chief city, Windsor, during the past century is entitled Garden Gateway to Canada. These last two appellations indicate its frontier position, its mild climate, and its fertile fields. The exploration of the Detroit River region was retarded by the warring expeditions of the Father of New France. In 1609 and 1615, when Champlain accompanied Algonquin and Huron Indians on forays against their Iroquois enemies, whose strongholds were located between the Hudson and Genesee rivers in the present State of New York, he sealed the friendship between the French and the Hurons and Algonquins. At the same time, however, he provoked later alignments of the Iroquois with their Dutch and English neighbours of the Atlantic seaboard, because the savages became convinced that the French were the allies of their Indian enemies. Because of this enmity of the Iroquois for the French, for half a century the French explorers and missionaries could not follow the St.
  • {PDF} Petun to Wyandot : the Ontario Petun from the Sixteenth Century

    {PDF} Petun to Wyandot : the Ontario Petun from the Sixteenth Century

    PETUN TO WYANDOT : THE ONTARIO PETUN FROM THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Charles Garrad | 656 pages | 12 May 2014 | University of Ottawa Press | 9780776621449 | English | Ottawa, Canada Petun to Wyandot : The Ontario Petun from the Sixteenth Century PDF Book The next year, the seat of the alliance shifts to the Wyandot town of Brownstown just outside of Detroit. Another century later, there were fewer than 1, Abenaki remaining after the american revolution. Township maps, portraits and properties have been scanned, with links from the property owners' names in the database. After a ten-day siege, Chonnonton and Ottawa take and sack one of the main towns of the Asistagueronon. JS: Tell us about your working space, why it serves you well and how you might improve it. The other presenter using slides and I were amazed at the Power Point presentations given by the students and other young people. Seven years later, an unknown epidemic struck, with influenza passing through the following year. Each man had different hunting territories inherited through his father. In , the French attacked the Mohawks and burned all the Mohawk villages and their food supply. The Anishinaabe defended this territory against Haudenosaunee warriors in the seenteenth century and its integrity was at the core of the peace they concluded in Montreal in , a key element of which was the Naagan ge bezhig emkwaan, or Dish with One Spoon. JS: I know you love science fiction, for one, so how about you describe some of you favourite films, books, and TV shows of any genre and tell us why they interest you.
  • Champlain and the Petun

    Champlain and the Petun

    CHAMPLAIN AND THE PETUN Charles Garrad Abstract Samuel de Champlain's account of his visit to the Petun is examined, and reconciled with the archaeologyof the Petun ArchaeologicalZone of Ontario. La visite de Samuel de Champlain chez les Petun est examinee, et reconcilee avec I'archeologie de la Zone Petun Archeologique de /'Ontario. Fiaure and MaRs followin~ Figure 1: Second Title-Page of the 1619 edition of Champlain's "Voyages" Figure 2: Part of Champlain's "Carte de la Nouvelle France" 1632, showing areas of varying accuracy Figure 3: Champlain's Route through the Gens de Petun in 1616 a.d, p.11 Q.!1 Sources Champlain's account of his visit to the Petun was first published as "Voyages et Descowertvresfaites en la Nowelle France, depuis !'annee 1615, iufques a la fin de !'annee 1618", Paris 1619 (Figure 1). This work was reprinted in 1620 and 1627 with variants of uncertain origin and reliability. In 1632, republished with variants in 1640, the account was substantially repeated in a composite historical summary covering the period 1603 to 1629, "Les Voyages de la Nouvelle France occidentale, dicte canada, faits par Ie Sf: de Champlain ..", Paris 1632, supposedly the work of Champlain at least in part (J. Home Cameron (in) Champlain III:xi-xii, IV:viii). The controversy as to the authorship of the variants, changes, and side-notes, and the motive for them, particularly the deletion of references to the Recollets from the 1632 work, is yet unresolved, but need not be investigated here. It is sufficient that Champlain unexpectedly spent the whole of the year 1619 in France, and "During this enforced leisure" (Trudel 1966:194) he there wrote his "Voyages ...", for the period 1615 to 1618, and saw the book published in 1619 while he was still there (Figure 1).