DOCSLIB.ORG

THE POLITICS of AESTHETICISM: PATER's “IMAGINATIVE” SYNTHESIS of EMPIRICISM and IDEALISM THROUGH HERACLITUS and KANT Kanar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE POLITICS of AESTHETICISM: PATER's “IMAGINATIVE” SYNTHESIS of EMPIRICISM and IDEALISM THROUGH HERACLITUS and KANT Kanar THE POLITICS OF AESTHETICISM: PATER’S “IMAGINATIVE” SYNTHESIS OF EMPIRICISM AND IDEALISM THROUGH HERACLITUS AND KANT Kanarakis Yannis ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI School of English Language and Literature CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER I: PATER AND THE EMPIRICAL PARADIGM OF HERACLITUS 1.1. The Spirit of the Age and Heraclitean Flux 17 1.2. The Heraclitean Doctrine 24 1.3. Heraclitus and Science in the “Conclusion” 33 1.4. Heraclitean Empiricism: Associationism and Sensationalism in the “Conclusion” 47 1.5. The Materialistic Ethics of Heraclitean Flux and Relativity 62 1.6. The Aesthete and the Scientist 71 1.7. Pater, Darwin, and Heraclitus 78 1.8. The Science of Imaginative Prose: Darwin and the Essay 84 1.9. The “Relish” of Flux: Abstraction in the Renaissance 95 1.10. Heraclitus and Abstraction 103 CHAPTER II: PATER AND THE IDEALIST PARADIGM OF KANT 2.1. The Paradigm of J. S. Mill 115 2.2. Kant’s “Empiricism”: Victorian Responses to the German Philosopher 120 2.3. Pater and the “Least Transcendental Parts of Kant” 131 2.4. The A Priori and Herbert Spencer 143 2.5. Aesthesis and Aesthetics 155 2.6. The Centripetal and the Centrifugal 162 2.7. The Purposiveness of Pater’s “Imaginative Reason” 171 2.8. A Model for the Individual 182 2.9. The Form of Copernican Revolution 191 2.10. Empirical Relativity and Idealist Functionalism 202 2.11. The Last Romantic 210 2.12. Heraclitus and Kant: Classicism and Romanticism 216 CHAPTER III: PATER’S SYNTHETIC VISION: MARIUS THE EPICUREAN, AND THE “BEATA URBS” 3.1. “Beauty” and “Pain”: The Corrective Revision of Pater’s “Imaginative” Work and the “Child in the House” 222 3.2. Formal Aspects of Marius the Epicurean 238 3.3. The “Age of Religious Revival” and Pater’s “Fourth Phase” 248 3.4. Of “Sensations”: Heraclitus, Cyrenaicism, and J. S. Mill 258 3.5. Of “Ideas”: Kant, Stoicism, and Pater’s “Second Thoughts” 272 3.6. Stoic and Idealist Shortcomings 288 3.7. “Eye” and “Duty”: The Synthetic Paradigm of Early Christianity 298 3.8. “Visible Symbolism” and “Unseen Morality”: Beauty as the Symbol of Morality 310 3.9. “Religious Beauty”: The Metaphysics of Aesthetics 323 CONCLUSION 337 WORKS CITED 341 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to thank the Institution of National Scholarships (IKY) for its financial support, which made this study possible. I would also like to express my gratitude to my family and Elias for their understanding and patience, and for making it easier for me to concentrate on this project. Last, but not least, I would like to thank my supervising committee, the source of inspiration and realization of this work. INTRODUCTION In 1877, G. G. Zerffi, a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, 1 published in the fifth volume of the Transactions of the Royal Historical Society the first of his four essays on “The Historical Development of Idealism and Realism,” where he acknowledged that [f]rom the very first dawn of consciousness man tried to solve the phenomena surrounding him in two divergent ways, which up to our times have been followed by two opposed parties. The controversy between idealists and realists, or materialists, is as old as man’s power of thinking. The history of man’s intellectual development in a wider sense is but the struggle between the two (I, 120). Zerffi’s interest in the topic was not accidental, since the critic was addressing, in the light of the historical research typical of his time, a phenomenon that had decisively shaped the character of 19th-century thought. This phenomenon involved the intellectual turmoil engendered by the “struggle” between the 19th- century “realists” on the one hand, as represented by Bentham’s political economy, Mill’s inductive empiricism, Comte’s positivism, Darwin’s evolutionism, and Tyndall and Huxley’s agnostic materialism, and the 19th-century “idealists” on the other, following the work of writers like Coleridge, Carlyle, Ruskin, Newman, and T. H. Green, who were influenced by Continental philosophy and upheld the importance of deductive thought, the return to religion, and the dynamic participation of the human mind in the production of knowledge. The marks of this “controversy” between the advocates of scientific relativism, naturalism and laissez-faire liberalism, who 1 Gustavus George Zerffi (1820-1892) was a very interesting 19th century figure. He was a Hungarian journalist and a secret service agent of Austria, who moved to London in 1853 becoming a member of the Royal Medical College and a secretary of the German National Association. Later on, he became a lecturer at the National Art Training School in South Kensington writing extensively on history and art. 2 envisioned a radical disruption from traditional values, and the idealists or humanists, who struggled to salvage what was left of the “old” world, can be detected in nearly all facets of 19th-century thought. Indicative of this conflicting atmosphere was the intellectual climate at the University of Oxford, where there were two influences: “the one, in more or less cordial alliance with Comte’s positive philosophy; the other, the more theoretical philosophy which connects itself with the names of Kant and Hegel” (Young 13).2 Zerffi’s study, nevertheless, which was finished in 1880 with the publication of the fourth and last essay on the topic, also reflected a catalytic shift that was gradually taking place at the time in the course of this long-standing “struggle.” It was the significance of this specific shift, as we shall see, that Zerffi’s historical emphasis on the development of the phenomenon actually underscored. During the last quarter of the 19th century, the profound consolidation of the idea of evolution in the Victorian imaginary, along with the spread of Hegelian historicism, gave birth to a new cultural viewpoint, which, as the historian puts it, did not “isolate phenomena in nature, facts in history, words in languages, art-forms in aesthetics, diseases in medicine” (I, 143), but rather strove to attest “union and harmony” among “discordant voices” (I, 120).3 This reconciliatory trend, just before the expiration of the 19th 2 This intriguing coexistence of conflicting outlooks, just before the advent of modernism, has been characterized as typical of 19th century thought by a series of studies, which offer a multiplicity of perspectives on the complexity of the topic.The conflict between the two schools of thought in terms of philosophic speculation is the object of Wendell V. Harris’ The Omnipresent Debate (1981). There are certain other studies which touch on the issue by implication. I can indicatively mention here Emory Neff’s Carlyle and Mill (1926), David DeLaura’s Hebrew and Hellene in Victorian England (1969), Edward Alexander’s Mathew Arnold and John Stuart Mill (1965) and Mathew Arnold, John Ruskin, and the Modern Temper (1973). 3 As Zerffi claims, “[s]cientific universal history becomes the more necessary the more the different special branches of science increase in details. History has to connect the apparently isolated facts, to trace in the discordant voices of generations and their complicated actions union and harmony” (I, 120). Later on in the same essay, after presenting “Darwin’s theory” as a principle of “union and harmony” too, he introduces Darwin as the first synthesizer of “realism and idealism”: “[t]he most important historical fact in the development of idealism and realism is undoubtedly Darwin’s theory. It is as influential as the astronomical discovery of Copernicus, the laws of Kepler or Newton’s theory of gravitation. It has been attacked as gross realism, and still the very basis of Darwin’s theory of descent 3 century, decisively affected the course of the long “controversy” between the two rival schools of thought, making Zerffi optimistically envision its ending by asserting in his study that “down to our times […] realism and idealism, speculation and experience, are trying to form the only possible united basis of our future scientific and historical progress” (I, 143). Paradigmatic of this climate of compromise was a series of late-19th-century thinkers, coming from different disciplines, who endorsed a radical form of reconciliation between the traditionally conceived “opposed parties:” Herbert Spencer, for example, fused a posteriori stimuli and a priori inherited mental formations so as to come up with “evolutionary Kantianism,” T. H. Green and F. H. Bradley grounded their absolute form of morality on an empiricist conception of feeling, G. H. Stout, H. Strut and H. Rashdall propounded a form of “empirical idealism,” H. S. Maine, W. Bagehot, W. K. Clifford, Leslie Stephen and D. Ritchie synthesized evolutionary biology, utilitarianism and Kantian criticism, whereas H. Sidwick blended utilitarian and idealist premises, following the early example of J, S. Mill’s union of Benthamite reason and Coleridgean feeling. The impact of this ground-breaking shift in perspective that Zerffi portrays was also reflected in the literature of the time. One of the first writers who responded with his multifaceted work to this reconciliatory climate was Walter Pater, the father of British Aestheticism. As an Oxford don, Pater spent most of his life in the university, where he was directly exposed to the intellectual shifts and debates of the time. He was extremely well-read in both philosophical traditions due to his fascination with contemporary thought, as Billie Andrew Inman’s invaluable study of is, as his greatest antagonist, Agassiz, has acknowledged, an ideal theory, a thought engendered a priori” (I, 142). Zerffi’s whole consideration is actually permeated by the Darwinian and the historical perspective as his diction (“dawn of consciousness,” “surrounding,” “struggle,” “history,” “development”) clearly manifests. 4 his readings and library borrowings has demonstrated,4 and responded to the intellectual anxieties of the time with work which, from his first essay in 1864 to his death in 1894, extended over a period of time that distinctively overlapped with this stormy period.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Walter Pater's Aesthetic Historicism
    Transfigured World · CAROLYN WILLIAMS · Transfigured World · WALTER PATER'S AESTHETIC HISTORICISM · Cornell University Press ITHACA AND LONDON Copyright © 1989 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850, or visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. First published 1989 by Cornell University Press. First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2016. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Williams, Carolyn, 1950– Transfigured world: Walter Pater’s aesthetic historicism / Carolyn Williams p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-8014-2151-8 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-5017-0724-7 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Pater, Walter, 1839–1894—Aesthetics. 2. Pater, Walter, 1839–1894— Knowledge—History. 3. Historicism. I. Title. PR5138.A35W5 1989 824'.8—dc20 89-42883 The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ For Cecil Lang Contents Acknowledgments ix Abbreviations xi Introduction I Part One • Opening Conclusions II I. "That Which Is Without" 14 2. "The Inward World of Thought and Feeling" 18 3. Aestheticism 26 4. Answerable Style 37 5. Iiistoricism 46 6. Aesthetic Iiistoricism and "Aesthetic Poetry" 57 7. The Poetics of Revival 68 Part Two • Figural Strategies in Th e Renaissance 79 I. Legend and Iiistoricity 82 2. Myths of Iiistory: Th e Last Supper 94 3. The Iiistoricity of Myth 103 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Pater's Portraits
    [Expo. 3.1 (2009) 23–40] Expositions (print) ISSN 1747-5368 doi:10.1558/expo.v3i1.23 Expositions (online) ISSN 1747-5376 Pater’s Portraits: The Aesthetic Hero in 1890 (Part II) GERALD MONSMAN University of Arizona [email protected] Abstract In conjunction with Walter Pater’s unfinished manuscript, “Gaudioso, the Second,” recently published in Expositions (Monsman 2008), a sec- ond manuscript fragment from among Pater’s papers is now also printed here for the first time: “Tibalt the Albigense” (circa 1890). Not long after Pater began research for his never-finished second novel,Gaston de Latour (1888/1995), he simultaneously began reading for his imaginary portrait of “Tibalt,” dealing with the prelude to the bloody Albigensian crusade. Like Gaston, “Tibalt” was to be set in France against the turbulent back- ground of religious warfare. But in contrast to the brutality of sectarian slaughter in Gaston, Pater elevates aesthetic experience to a mystical and Platonically mythic level of enchantment. From his first aesthetic portrait, “The Child in the House” (1878)—a defense of his aestheticism inStudies in the History of the Renaissance (1873)—to “Tibalt the Albigense,” Pater’s fascination with the transformative power of beauty at the turning- points of religious/cultural history is the major thrust of all his writings. Keywords: Albigensian Heresy, Aesthetic Hero, Walter Pater, Aestheticism, Medieval France Walter Pater, essayist and critic, began publishing fiction belatedly in his career, in his thirty-eighth year, when he wrote the poetically evocative allegory of “The Child in the House” (1878). It is a covert self-portrait of his fascination with beauty and pain that developed as he grew up in a quintessentially Victorian home.
    [Show full text]
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many Thanks to My Advisor Dr. Stern for Her
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to my advisor Dr. Stern for her dedication to this project over the months of its development. It is safe to say that without her guidance and nigh-saintly patience I would still be hacking through the thicket, so to speak. I would also like to extend my gratitude to Ng Yun Sian and Dr. Whalen-Bridge. Without their support, I would not have been able to even undertake this project. Finally, it is necessary to express my deep appreciation for those figures who, despite their tenancy in those shadowy borderlands we call Fancy, ultimately shaped this project more than I have. I refer, of course, to those unreal interlocutors who so graciously offered up their aesthetic theories and spiritual experiences for vivisection. Thanks to Marius, Lord Henry, Gilbert and Ernest, Baldwin, Olivia, and Althea. i Il voulait, en somme, une œuvre d’art et pour ce qu’elle était par elle-même et pour ce qu’elle pouvait permettre de lui prêter ; il voulait aller avec elle, grâce à elle, comme soutenu par un adjuvant, comme porté par un véhicule, dans une sphère où les sensations sublimées lui imprimeraient une commotion inattendue et dont il chercherait longtemps et même vainement à analyser les causes. —J.K Huysmans, À Rebours ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....1 “This World’s Delightful Shows:” The Sensuous and the Spiritual in Marius the Epicurean………………………………..……………………………………………………………………………………..5 “Where I Walk There are Thorns:” The Aesthetics of Sorrow in Oscar Wilde……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………24 “The Use of the Soul:” Vernon Lee’s Supernatural and Social Project…………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………42 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………58 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………60 iii Introduction Situated at the end of the 19th century, the late Victorian era occupies a particularly vital position in the development of western literature and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus
    The meditations of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Originally translated by Meric Casaubon About this edition Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus was Emperor of Rome from 161 to his death, the last of the “Five Good Emperors.” He was nephew, son-in-law, and adoptive son of Antonius Pius. Marcus Aurelius was one of the most important Stoic philosophers, cited by H.P. Blavatsky amongst famous classic sages and writers such as Plato, Eu- ripides, Socrates, Aristophanes, Pindar, Plutarch, Isocrates, Diodorus, Cicero, and Epictetus.1 This edition was originally translated out of the Greek by Meric Casaubon in 1634 as “The Golden Book of Marcus Aurelius,” with an Introduction by W.H.D. Rouse. It was subsequently edited by Ernest Rhys. London: J.M. Dent & Co; New York: E.P. Dutton & Co, 1906; Everyman’s Library. 1 Cf. Blavatsky Collected Writings, (THE ORIGIN OF THE MYSTERIES) XIV p. 257 Marcus Aurelius' Meditations - tr. Casaubon v. 8.16, uploaded to www.philaletheians.co.uk, 14 July 2013 Page 1 of 128 LIVING THE LIFE SERIES MEDITATIONS OF MARCUS AURELIUS Chief English translations of Marcus Aurelius Meric Casaubon, 1634; Jeremy Collier, 1701; James Thomson, 1747; R. Graves, 1792; H. McCormac, 1844; George Long, 1862; G.H. Rendall, 1898; and J. Jackson, 1906. Renan’s “Marc-Aurèle” — in his “History of the Origins of Christianity,” which ap- peared in 1882 — is the most vital and original book to be had relating to the time of Marcus Aurelius. Pater’s “Marius the Epicurean” forms another outside commentary, which is of service in the imaginative attempt to create again the period.2 Contents Introduction 3 THE FIRST BOOK 12 THE SECOND BOOK 19 THE THIRD BOOK 23 THE FOURTH BOOK 29 THE FIFTH BOOK 38 THE SIXTH BOOK 47 THE SEVENTH BOOK 57 THE EIGHTH BOOK 67 THE NINTH BOOK 77 THE TENTH BOOK 86 THE ELEVENTH BOOK 96 THE TWELFTH BOOK 104 Appendix 110 Notes 122 Glossary 123 A parting thought 128 2 [Brought forward from p.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Pater: Humanist
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Literature in English, British Isles English Language and Literature 1970 Walter Pater: Humanist Richmond Crinkley Folger Shakespeare Library Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Crinkley, Richmond, "Walter Pater: Humanist" (1970). Literature in English, British Isles. 31. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_english_language_and_literature_british_isles/31 WALTER PATER: HUMANIST This page intentionally left blank WALTER PATER: HUMANIST J.: :1 Richmond Crinkley The University Press of Kentucky Standard Book Number 8131-1221-4 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 70-ll98ll COPYRIGHT© 1970 BY THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY A statewide cooperative scholarly publishing agency serving Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, Kentucky State College, Morehead State University, Murray State University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. Editorial and Sales Offices: Lexington, Kentucky 40506 CONTENTS Preface tx CHAPTER ONE The Renaissance I CHAPTER TWO The Critic of Form 33 CHAPTER THREE The Living & the Dead 69 CHAPTER FOUR The House Beautiful & the Cathedral
    [Show full text]
  • The Pater Newsletter
    THE PATER NEWSLETTER A PUBLICAT I ON OF T HE INTERNATION A L WAL TER PATER SOCIETY EDITOR Mcgan Becker-Leckronc, University of Ncvacla, Las Vcgas EDITORIAL BOARD James Eli Adams, Cornell University Barfie Bullen, University of Reading Laurel Brake, Birkbeck College, University of London Lesley Higgins, York University Bi ll ic Anclrew l nman, University of Arizona, Emerita Franco Marucci, Universita dcgli Studi di Venezia Catherine MaxweIJ, <2.!Jeen Mary College, University of London Noriyuki Nozue, Osaka City University Robert Seiler, University of Calgary Paul Tucker, Universita degli Studi cli Pis a Hayden Wa rd, West Virgin ia University, Emeritus BOOK REVI E W EDI T OR Carolyn Williams, Rutgers University BIBLIOGRAPHER Kenneth Daley, Columbia College, C hi cago ANNOTATORS Kit Andrews,Western Oregon University Kenneth Dale)" Columbia College, Chicago Andrew Eastham, j(jng's College, University of London Mcghan A. Freeman, Tu1ane University Noriyuki Nozue, Osaka City Univers ity EDITORIAL C ORRESPONDEN C E Megan Becker- Leckrone, Department of English, Box 455011 , 4505 Maryland Parkway, UNLV, Las Vegas, NV 89154-5011 e-mail [email protected] lel 702895 1244 l ax 702 895 4801 IWPS OFFICERS President, Laurel Brake, Birkbeck College, University of London Vice-President, Lesley Higgins, York University INTERNATIONAL WALTER PATER SOCIETY CORRESPONDEN C E Laurel Brake, Centre for Extramural Studies, Birkbeck College Russell Square, London, UK WCIB 5DQ e-mail [email protected] lax 44207631 6688 Lesley Higgins, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada e-mai/[email protected] le! 4167362100, x22344 lax 4167365412 The Paler N ewsletter (ISSN 0264- 8342) is published twice yearly by the 1nternationaI W aIter Pater Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Readings on Augmented Reality, Ekphrasis, and Michael Field Robert P
    West Chester University Digital Commons @ West Chester University Sight and Song Augmented: Painting and Poetry in Sight and Song Mixed Reality Spring 5-23-2017 Selected Readings on Augmented Reality, Ekphrasis, and Michael Field Robert P. Fletcher West Chester University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/sight_song_series Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, Digital Humanities Commons, Interdisciplinary Arts and Media Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, Other Film and Media Studies Commons, Performance Studies Commons, Reading and Language Commons, and the Visual Studies Commons Recommended Citation Fletcher, R. P. (2017). Selected Readings on Augmented Reality, Ekphrasis, and Michael Field. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/sight_song_series/8 This Bibliography is brought to you for free and open access by the Sight and Song at Digital Commons @ West Chester University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sight and Song Augmented: Painting and Poetry in Mixed Reality by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ West Chester University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sight and Song Augmented: Poetry and Painting in Mixed Reality Selected Readings on Augmented Reality, Ekphrasis, and Michael Field Augmented Reality Barba, Evan, Blair MacIntyre and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. “Here We Are! Where Are We? Locating Mixed Reality in the Age of the Smartphone.” Proceedings of the IEEE 100.4 (April 2012): 929-936. Berry, Marsha and Omega Goodwin. “Poetry 4 U: Pinning poems under/over/through the streets.” New Media and Society 15.6 (2012): 909-929. Print. Bolter, Jay David and Maria Engberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Pater (1839-1894)
    WALTER PATER (1839-1894) Walter Horatio Pater was, along with A. C. Swinburne, Simeon Solomon, and Whistler, one of the controversial nineteenth-century English aesthetes. Like them he was much influenced by continental ideas and art, and like Swinburne he began publishing as a critic in the journals in the 1860s. Valuing the form and architectonics of art and life, and the aesthetic experience they allegedly offered above any moral or religious messages in his early work, Pater explicitly resisted Matthew Arnold’s and John Ruskin’s spiritual Elliott & Fry. Walter Pater. and political agendas. Pursuing his notion of the Half-plate glass copy “aesthetic critic” (1873), Pater created a unique series of negative. Circa 1890s, National Portrait Gallery, article-essays in the press from 1866, first on aesthetics London. and on modern English poets (Coleridge and William Morris), and then, from 1869, on Renaissance art, philosophy, and literature. In 1873 he shaped a Macmillan book out of some of these. Studies in the History of the Renaissance, despite its title, deployed the last section of the Morris article as its Conclusion and spanned the twelfth century to the eighteenth. Notable for their artfully honed prose, its chapters, like a modern-day Vasari, conflated biography, history, and character to develop a genre that Pater later called “imaginary portraits” and “appreciations.” Likewise in the 1880s he explicated the aesthetics of prose in “Style” (1888), an article indebted to his recent review of Flaubert. With Studies 1 Pater attracted both admiration and revulsion, resulting in a gap of a dozen years before publication of his next book, an historical novel, Marius the Epicurean, an attempt to explain the hedonism for which Studies had been castigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Brasenose College Archives Walter Horatio Pater
    BRASENOSE COLLEGE ARCHIVES WALTER HORATIO PATER Biographical information 4 Aug 1839 Born at 1 Honduras Terrace, Commercial Road, Stepney, London Son of Dr Richard Glode Pater and Maria Hill 1853-1858 Educated at King's School, Canterbury 11 Jun 1858 Matriculated at Queen’s College, Oxford, aged 18 1862 Awarded 2 Class in Literae Humaniores and B.A. 5 Feb 1864 Elected to a (Founders) Fellowship at Brasenose College, Oxford 1865 Awarded M.A. 1867-1883 Tutor at Brasenose College (Classics) 1885 Curator of the University Galleries 30 Jul 1894 Died; memorial in Brasenose College Chapel Works included: Winckelmann, 1867 Aesthetic Poetry, 1868 Notes on Leonardo da Vinci, 1869 Fragment on Sandro Botticelli, 1870 Michelangelo, 1871 Studies in the History of the Renaissance, 1873 Marius the Epicurean, 1885 Imaginary Portraits, 1887 Appreciations, with an Essay on Style, 1889 Emerald Uthwart (New Review), 1892 Plato and Platonism, 1893 Apollo in Picardy (Harper’s Magazine), 1893 The Child in the House, 1894 Some Churches in France (19th Century), 1894 Miscellaneous Studies, 1895 Greek Studies, 1895 Pascal (Contemporary Review), 1895 Gaston de la Tour (Macmillan’s Magazine, June to October 1888), 1896 Essays in the Guardian, 1896 Collected Works (Edition de Luxe) 1900-01 BRASENOSE COLLEGE ARCHIVES WALTER HORATIO PATER See also: Brasenose Quartercentenary Monograph XIV.2 ‘Nine Brasenose Worthies’ by John Buchan (Walter Horatio Pater, pp. 23-30) Brasenose College Library Records (not yet catalogued): 2 – Register of Library Library Borrowers, with
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Cultural Divide: Walter Pater, Wilkie Collins, and the Legacies of Wordsworthian Aesthetics
    Rethinking the Cultural Divide: Walter Pater, Wilkie Collins, and the Legacies of Wordsworthian Aesthetics NOEL B. JACKSON Massachusetts Institute of Technology In discussions of the division between high art and mass culture, few notions have secured more consensus than that concerning the basis upon which we generally make such distinctions in the first place. In an argument that has proved exceedingly influential for our theoretical understanding of the so-called cultural divide, Pierre Bourdieu in Dis- tinction (1979) described as the defining characteristic of elite aesthetics “a refusal of ‘impure’ taste and of aisthesis (sensation), the simple, prim- itive form of pleasure reduced to a pleasure of the senses.”1 On this (widely shared) account, the refusal of sensation represents not merely a site but the primary source of the cultural divide, which has both its origin and its strongest basis in the rupture between sensuous and re- flective aesthetic experience. If the distinction between elite and popular culture is now com- monly regarded as having its theoretical basis in the refusal of sensa- tion, critics are just as united in dating this refusal to the period of European Romanticism. In the widely cited “Postscript” to Distinction, Bourdieu finds the theoretical grounding for “high” literary aesthetics in Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Judgment (1790), particularly in Kant’s insistence that the basis for the subjective universal validity of aesthetic experience resides not in bodily sense but rather in the higher cognitive For valuable assistance with this essay, I wish to thank Marshall Brown, Jim Chandler, Bo-Mi Choi, Charles Rzepka, Jon Sachs, the editors of and peer reviewers for Modern Philology, and the audiences at several forums in which I presented early versions of this work, including the 2002 International Conference on Romanticism in Tallahas- see, Florida, the MIT History/Literature Workshop, and the Romantic Literature and Culture Seminar at Harvard University.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Sort of Chivalrous Conscience”
    Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice Series C Faculty of Humanities 10 (2004) Michael M. KAYLOR ‘Tempting Suggestible Young Men’: Pater, Pedagogy, Pederasty This article considers biographical and textual materials relating to the Victorian pederastic pedagogy of Walter Pater, an Oxford don, author, and aesthetic critic. Emphasis is placed on the ways that his novel ‘Marius the Epicurean’ and essay ‘Winckelmann’ serve to elucidate this merging of pederasty and pedagogy, as well as the influence of this merging on his former student and later friend Gerard Manley Hopkins, one of the premier Victorian poets, a poet whose ‘Epithalamion’ provides the fullest Uranian encapsulation of Pater’s elaborate and decadent pedagogy. I will not sing my little puny songs. […] Therefore in passiveness I will lie still, And let the multitudinous music of the Greek Pass into me, till I am musical. (Digby Mackworth Dolben, ‘After Reading Aeschylus’)1 Puzzled by the degree of intimacy between ‘a shy, reticent scholar-artist’ and ‘a self-silenced, ascetic priest-poet’, David Anthony Downes speculates: ‘It has been frequently said that Gerard Manley Hopkins and Walter Pater were friends. The statement is a true one, though exactly what it means, perhaps, will never be known’.2 Apprehensive that such speculations might lead to elaboration on their erotic sensibilities, Linda Dowling cautions that ‘Given the fragmentary biographical materials we possess about both Hopkins and Pater, any assertion about the “homoerotic” nature of their experience or imagination may seem at best 1 The Poems of Digby Mackworth Dolben, ed. by Robert Bridges, 1st edn (London: Oxford University Press, 1911), p.23.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen, October 2011
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Copenhagen University Research Information System Walter Pater and the Language of Sculpture Østermark-Johansen, Lene Publication date: 2012 Document version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (APA): Østermark-Johansen, L. (2012). Walter Pater and the Language of Sculpture. København: Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 08. apr.. 2020 Lene Østermark-Johansen Summary of Walter Pater and the Language of Sculpture (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), 364 pp, 109 illustrations Submitted for the degree of Dr. Phil. at the Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, October 2011 Walter Pater and the Language of Sculpture is both a monograph on the Victorian writer Walter Pater (1839-94) and an attempt to place his writings and his ideas of art and style within the context of the history of aesthetics from the Renaissance until the late nineteenth century. As indicated by its title, the book is interdisciplinary: the visual arts and literature, both prose and fiction. My juxtaposition of language and sculpture in the title encompasses a range of different aspects of the literary and the sculptural in Pater’s writings: Sculpture as an art form The plasticity of language and prose style Sculpture as metaphor The critical language employed in discussions of individual works of sculpture Sculpture as a state of mind, an image of the process of thought The etymological and semantic stratification of language as essentially sculptural My definition of sculpture is broad and covers far more than three-dimensional sculpture in the round.
    [Show full text]