Against Marine Fish Hatcheries: Ironies of Fishery Politics in the Technological

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Against Marine Fish Hatcheries: Ironies of Fishery Politics in the Technological MACCALL: AGAINST MARINE FISH HATCHERIES CalCOFl Rep., Vol. 30,1989 AGAINST MARINE FISH HATCHERIES: IRONIES OF FISHERY POLITICS IN THE TECHNOLOGICAL ERA ALEC D MACCALL Southwest Fisheries Center 3150 Paradise Drive Tiburon, California 94920 ABSTRACT likely to solve the problem of declining fish stocks. Marine fish hatcheries have a long history of ex- Rather, consideration of artificial propagation is pensive operation with no demonstrable positive making fishery resource problems worse. effect on the resource. It is exceedingly difficult to detect hatchery-produced fish. Although very ex- HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE pensive, full hatchery operation may be necessary The “hatchery solution” has a long history of to determine effectiveness. Modern techniques of attempted marine application, and from that his- genetic marking and fingerprinting provide new tory we should be able to learn a few lessons. Cod tools for determining hatchery success. Unfortu- (Gudu~mouhua) larvae were released into the Atlan- nately, legislation to fund research on hatcheries is tic Ocean for nearly a hundred years, beginning in forestalling vitally needed legislation to stop further the late nineteenth century. In the United States, deterioration of fish stocks. Popular interest in ma- some 50 billion cod larvae were released between rine fish hatcheries is having a deleterious rather 1890 and 1950, but it wasn’t until 1952 that the op- than beneficial effect on the resources. eration was terminated due to lack of evidence that any worthwhile benefits had been obtained (Dun- RESUMEN can and Meehan 1954). Las piscifactorias marinas poseen una larga his- The history of the Norwegian cod hatchery ini- toria de costosas operacioiies que no han demon- tiated by Captain Dannevig at Fbdevigen (re- strado UII efecto positivo sobre el recurso pesquero. viewed by Solemdal et al. 1984) provides further Resulta excesivamente dificultoso detectar peces de evidence that wishful thinking can postpone ra- criaderos. A pesar del alto costo, tal vez sea necesa- tional decisions almost indefinitely. The Norwe- rio mantener criaderos totalniente fuiicionales por gian hatchery operation was not closed until 1971, UII tienipo prolongado para deterniinar su eficacia. despite decades of research that failed to demon- Las ticiiicas modernas de niarcacion genktica e iden- strate any effect on the fish population. In 1911, Jo- tificacion individual (equivaleiite a1 us0 de impre- han Hjort and a minority faction of a government siones digitales) proveen nuevas herramientas para comniittee issued an opinion that the question con- deterniinar el &xito de un determiiiado criadero. cerning the benefit from the Flerdevigen hatchery Nos urge la necesidad de una legislacion que legisle was unsolvable, and that the hatchery should be la disponibilidad de foiidos para la investigacion de discontinued. The majority of the committee ad- piscifactorias para evitar o frenar el deterioro de las vised against the hatchery’s termination, but did poblaciones de peces. point out that current methods needed to be re- placed by unspecified “more complete” methods INTRODUCTION (cited in Solemdal et al. 1984). Ironically, the result Several of California’s marine fish stocks have was conversion of the Flerdevigen hatchery from a declined severely over the past 70 years. Recrea- privately funded operation to a government opera- tional and coniniercial fishermen have become in- tion, which was to continue in virtually the same creasingly vocal about rights to the dwindling mode of operation for 60 more years. supply of fish. 111 California, the concept of niariiie It is interesting to read portions of Solemdal et al. fish hatcheries was successfully promoted in the (1984) in view of currently renewed hatchery inter- state legislature as a painless answer to this problem. est in Norway. Whereas the former practice was to A well-meaning California politician explained that release early larvae, the new approach is to raise the instead of fighting over smaller and smaller slices of fish to somewhat larger size and release them as the pie, we now have the opportunity to increase juveniles; this is similar to the California plan. the size of the pie itself. A modern technological The seemingly obtuse custom ofintroducing a practice solution to a politically difficult problem is hard to prior to investigating its effect, as was the convention in argue against. Yet I doubt that niariiie hatcheries are Flcadevigen in the 1880’s may in fact have been a necessity 46 MACCALL: AGAINST MARINE FISH HATCHERIES CalCOFl Rep., Vol. 30,1989 during those pioneer days of small scientific staff and reational species. But without the second kind of little experience. With our knowledge, experience and evidence, there is no way of knowing whether the well established research institutions the scientific inves- resource itself is being enhanced, which is the usual tigations should precede the practice. We are specially stated goal of these operations. There is no reason thinking of the mass production of cod 0-group and the to believe a priori that the hatchery-reared fish is possibilities of restocking depleted populations. capable of natural reproduction in the wild; the fact Though the consistency of fry production still has to is that we just don’t know, and have little chance of be demonstrated it is obvious that mass production will be a reality within some years. The fry produced can be finding out. used either in intense farming or released into the sea as a As a scientific problem, the null hypothesis is not method for population restocking. Many people have a clear. We could choose either H,:hatchery fish are strong belief in the latter concept, while others are more not reproductively viable, or H,:hatchery fish are skeptical. In fact, the situation is about the same as when reproductively viable. The extreme difficulty of Captain Dannevig was applying for support in the early testing either hypothesis suggests that the null hy- 1880’s. pothesis, whichever it is, will not be rejected. The primary difference is that today the development Therefore, I submit that this either is bad science or is mostly an official task and therefore should be both it is not science at all. Moreover, without a substan- under scientific and economic control. But the American tial technological breakthrough, it is fraudulent to hatcheries which were also developed within the official system, show that this is not a guarantee for the proper, claim that a marine hatchery program can be eval- logical and sound development of a project. The most uated “scientifically.” obvious pitfalls today are lack of knowledge by the Fortunately, such a breakthrough may have oc- administration, too optimistic statements by scientists curred. About the only conclusive way to answer quoted by mass media, the general tendency of “fashion these questions is to mark and count the fish that are thinking” among administrators and scientists, and released from the hatchery, and monitor their re- probably also critical funding from outside sources, e.g. capture. Physical tags or markings can pose a hand- the oil industry. icap to survival in the wild, and could bias the These statements apply equally to the marine fish results; they also provide no information on repro- hatchery program in California. To the credit of the ductive success. Only through genetic marking, a California program, there is an explicit research technology that recently has become practically fea- component that is supposed to examine the effec- sible, can effective reproduction be tested. A genetic tiveness of such a program. However, determining strain, as well as its offspring, should be detectable the survival rate of hatchery-produced fish requires by genetic fingerprinting methods. Again, devel- such a large output of those fish that a hatchery opment of a genetic strain requires a long time and program must be fully implemented in order to de- a large investment in hatchery facilities, before the termine its effectiveness! Thus the ideal of investi- program’s potential effectiveness can be determined. gation preceding practice may not be achievable. Although evaluating a marine hatchery program Yet, as history has shown, the momentum gener- may now be feasible, it remains extremely difficult ated is very hard to stop, despite lack of evidence and expensive. And that very expense bodes ill for that the program is effective. In fact, our technol- an objective accounting of cost-effectiveness. ogy for demonstrating positive effect in the open The few cases where marine hatcheries seem to ocean is little better than it was at the turn of the have produced recoverable fish have been associ- century when Hj ort deemed the question unsolvable. ated with estuarine rather than open-ocean fisheries (e.g., Rutledge 1989). Application to a slow- SCIENCE AND HATCHERY EVALUATION growing, late-maturing, long-lived oceanic fish The fundamental requirements for evaluating such as white seabass (Atvactoscion nobilis), as is stock enhancement by means of a hatchery opera- being considered in California, strains biological tion are twofold: first, we must be able to identify and economic credibility. These fish will not be- hatchery-produced fish in subsequent catches, and come vulnerable to the commercial fishery for second, we must be able to identify the genes of nearly ten years, which entails a substantial discount hatchery-produced fish in subsequent wild popula- in economic value as well as attrition by natural tions. The remaining information needed to evalu- mortality. The recreational fishery may encounter ate a hatchery program is relatively trivial. If a these fish somewhat younger, and values are un- sufficient fraction of hatchery fish live long enough doubtedly higher to this segment of the fishery, but to be harvested, it may be possible to justify a put- relative fishing pressures indicate that the bulk of and-take operation, as is often done for inland rec- the catch will be taken by the commercial fishery.
Recommended publications
  • DYNAMIC HABITAT USE of ALBACORE and THEIR PRIMARY PREY SPECIES in the CALIFORNIA CURRENT SYSTEM Calcofi Rep., Vol
    MUHLING ET AL.: DYNAMIC HABITAT USE OF ALBACORE AND THEIR PRIMARY PREY SPECIES IN THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT SYSTEM CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 60, 2019 DYNAMIC HABITAT USE OF ALBACORE AND THEIR PRIMARY PREY SPECIES IN THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT SYSTEM BARBARA MUHLING, STEPHANIE BRODIE, MICHAEL JACOX OWYN SNODGRASS, DESIREE TOMMASI NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory University of California, Santa Cruz Boulder, CO Institute for Marine Science Santa Cruz, CA CHRISTOPHER A. EDWARDS ph: (858) 546-7197 Ocean Sciences Department [email protected] University of California, Santa Cruz, CA BARBARA MUHLING, OWYN SNODGRASS, YI XU HEIDI DEWAR, DESIREE TOMMASI, JOHN CHILDERS Department of Fisheries and Oceans NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center Delta, British Columbia, Canada San Diego, CA STEPHANIE SNYDER STEPHANIE BRODIE, MICHAEL JACOX Thomas More University, NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center Crestview Hills, KY Monterey, CA ABSTRACT peiods, krill, and some cephalopods (Smith et al. 2011). Juvenile north Pacific albacore Thunnus( alalunga) for- Many of these forage species are fished commercially, age in the California Current System (CCS), supporting but also support higher-order predators further up the fisheries between Baja California and British Columbia. food chain, such as other exploited species (e.g., tunas, Within the CCS, their distribution, abundance, and for- billfish) and protected resources (e.g., marine mammals aging behaviors are strongly variable interannually. Here, and seabirds) (Pikitch et al. 2004; Link and Browman we use catch logbook data and trawl survey records to 2014). Effectively managing marine ecosystems to pre- investigate how juvenile albacore in the CCS use their serve these trophic linkages, and improve robustness of oceanographic environment, and how their distributions management strategies to environmental variability, thus overlap with the habitats of four key forage species.
    [Show full text]
  • California Sea Lion Interaction and Depredation Rates with the Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Fleet Near San Diego
    HANAN ET AL.: SEA LIONS AND COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING VESSELS CalCOFl Rep., Vol. 30,1989 CALIFORNIA SEA LION INTERACTION AND DEPREDATION RATES WITH THE COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING VESSEL FLEET NEAR SAN DIEGO DOYLE A. HANAN, LISA M. JONES ROBERT B. READ California Department of Fish and Game California Department of Fish and Game c/o Southwest Fisheries Center 1350 Front Street, Room 2006 P.O. Box 271 San Diego, California 92101 La Jolla, California 92038 ABSTRACT anchovies, Engraulis movdax, which are thrown California sea lions depredate sport fish caught from the fishing boat to lure surface and mid-depth by anglers aboard commercial passenger fishing fish within casting range. Although depredation be- vessels. During a statewide survey in 1978, San havior has not been observed along the California Diego County was identified as the area with the coast among other marine mammals, it has become highest rates of interaction and depredation by sea a serious problem with sea lions, and is less serious lions. Subsequently, the California Department of with harbor seals. The behavior is generally not Fish and Game began monitoring the rates and con- appreciated by the boat operators or the anglers, ducting research on reducing them. The sea lion even though some crew and anglers encourage it by interaction and depredation rates for San Diego hand-feeding the sea lions. County declined from 1984 to 1988. During depredation, sea lions usually surface some distance from the boat, dive to swim under RESUMEN the boat, take a fish, and then reappear a safe dis- Los leones marinos en California depredan peces tance away to eat the fish, tear it apart, or just throw colectados por pescadores a bordo de embarca- it around on the surface of the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontmatter Final.Qxd
    5-14 Committee Rept final:5-9 Committee Rept 11/8/08 6:11 PM Page 5 COMMITTEE REPORT CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 49, 2008 Part I REPORTS, REVIEW, AND PUBLICATIONS REPORT OF THE CALCOFI COMMITTEE NOAA HIGHLIGHTS The David Starr Jordan will conduct operations in the Southern California Bight in San Diego and stations CalCOFI Cruises from Point Conception north to San Francisco, Cali- The CalCOFI program completed its fifty-eighth year fornia. The Miller Freeman will synoptically conduct sim - with four successful quarterly cruises. All four cruises ilar operations over the northern section of the CCE, were manned by personnel from both the NOAA in Port Townsend, Washington, and south to San Fran- Fisheries Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC) cisco. An additional California Current Ecosystem sur - and Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO). The fall vey will be conducted in July 2008. 2007 cruise was conducted on the SIO RV New Horizon and covered the southern lines of the CalCOFI pattern. CalCOFI Ichthyoplankton Update The winter and spring 2007 cruises were conducted on The SWFSC Ichthyoplankton Ecology group made the NOAA RV David Starr Jordan . The Jordan covered progress on a multi-year project to update larval fish lines 93 to line 60 just north of San Francisco. The sum - identifications to current standards from 1951 to the pre - mer 2007 cruise was on the SIO RV New Horizon , and sent, which will ultimately provide taxonomic consis - covered the standard CalCOFI pattern. tency throughout the CalCOFI ichthyoplankton time Standard CalCOFI protocols were followed during series. The group updated samples collected during the the four quarterly cruises.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Instructions
    Final Project Instructions Date Submitted: November 16, 2012 Platform: NOAA Ship Bell M. Shimada Project Number: SH-13-01 (OMAO), 1301SH (SWFSC) Project Title: CalCOFI Survey, Fisheries Resources Division. Project Dates: January 4, 2013 to February 7, 2013 Prepared by: ________________________ Dated: _November 16,_2012_ David Griffith Chief Scientist SWFSC Approved by: ________________________ Dated: __________________ Russ Vetter , Ph.D. Fisheries Resources Director SWFSC Approved by: ________________________ Dated: __________________ Francisco E. Werner, Ph.D. Science and Research Director SWFSC Approved by: ________________________ Dated: ________________ Captain Wade J. Blake, NOAA Commanding Officer Marine Operations Center - Pacific 1 I. Overview A. Brief Summary and Project Period Survey the distributions and abundances of pelagic fish stocks, their prey, and their biotic and abiotic environments in the area of the California Current between San Francisco, California and San Diego, California during the period of January 9 to February 2, 2013. B. Service Level Agreements Of the 33 DAS scheduled for this project, 0 DAS are funded by the program and 33 DAS are funded by OMAO. This project is estimated to exhibit a medium Operational Tempo. C. Operating Area 2 D. Summary of Objectives Survey the distributions and abundances of pelagic fish stocks, their prey, and their biotic and abiotic environments in the area of the California Current between San Francisco, California and San Diego, California. The following are specific objectives for the Winter CalCOFI. I.D.1. Continuously sample pelagic fish eggs using the Continuous Underway Fish Egg Sampler (CUFES). The data will be used to estimate the distributions and abundances of spawning hake, anchovy, mackerel, and early spawning Pacific sardine.
    [Show full text]
  • Views Concerning Use of the Living Resources of the California Current
    Calif. JIw. Res. Comna., CalCOFI Rept., 13 : 91-94, 1969 VIEWS CONCERNING USE OF THE LIVING RESOURCES OF THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT GERALD V. HOWARD, Regional Director Pacific Southwest Region Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Terminal Island, California I have been asked to express the views of the Bu- ‘wetfish ’ ’ fisheries which harvest mackerels, anchovies reau of Commercial Fisheries concerning the legal, and bonito ; and the “ bottomfish ” fisheries which har- economic, sociological and technological problems im- rest, though not exclusiuely, species taken by trawl- peding the best use of the living resources of the ing. California Current and how they can be resolved. Californians generally do not think of the tropical The impediments are generally rather well knowii. It tunas as a resource of the California Current, prob- is their resolution which presents the challenge. ably because they occur in its southern extension off A rnajor objective of the programs of the Bureau Baja California and rarely in commercial quantities of Commercial Fisheries is to seek the resolution of off southern California. I have included them not only problems which handicap the economic well-being of because they support California’s most important the domestic fishing industry and hinder the best use fishery, but because the long-range tuna fleet’s experi- of the fishery resources. Success of Bureau research ence in overcoming economic difficulties has been more and service programs, however, depends on close col- successful than that of other elements of the Cali- laboration and cooperation with other parties, espe- fornia fishing fleet. I especially wish to mention cially State agencics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Review of Fisheries Statistics and Environmental and Societal Influences Off the Palos Verdes Peninsula, California
    STULL ET AL. : PALOS VERDES SPORT AND COMMERCIAL FISHERY CalCOFI Rep., Vol. XXVIII, 1987 A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF FISHERIES STATISTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIETAL INFLUENCES OFF THE PALOS VERDES PENINSULA, CALIFORNIA JANET K. STULL, KELLY A. DRYDEN PAUL A. GREGORY Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts California Department of Fish and Game P.O. Box 4998 245 West Broadway Whittier. California 90607 Long Beach, California 90802 ABSTRACT peracion ambiental significativa y puede estar aso- A synopsis of partyboat and commercial fish and ciado con una reducci6n en la contaminacion del invertebrate catches is presented for the Palos medio ambiente marino costero. Verdes region. Fifty years (1936-85) of partyboat catch, in numbers of fish and angler effort, and 15 INTRODUCTION years (1969-83) of commercial landings, in Our goals were to summarize long-term fish and pounds, are reviewed. Several hypotheses are invertebrate catch statistics gathered by the Cali- proposed to explain fluctuations in partyboat fornia Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) for (commercial passenger fishing vessel) and com- the Palos Verdes Peninsula, to infer relative fish mercial fishery catches. Where possible, compari- abundance and human consumption rates, and, sons are drawn to relate catch information to envi- where possible, to better understand influences ronmental and societal influences. This report from natural and human environmental perturba- documents trends in historical resource use and tions. We examined total catches and common and fish consumption patterns, and is useful for re- economically important species, in addition to spe- gional fisheries management. The status of several cies with reported elevated body burdens of con- species has improved since the early to mid-1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Forcing on Fish Abundance in the Southern California Current System
    Received: 19 May 2016 | Accepted: 8 December 2017 DOI: 10.1111/fog.12267 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Physical forcing on fish abundance in the southern California Current System Lia Siegelman-Charbit1 | J. Anthony Koslow2 | Michael G. Jacox3,4 | Elliott L. Hazen3 | Steven J. Bograd3 | Eric F. Miller5 1Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France Abstract 2Scripps Institution of Oceanography, The California Current System (CCS) is an eastern boundary current system with University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, strong biological productivity largely due to seasonal wind-driven upwelling and CA, USA 3National Oceanic and Atmospheric transport of the California Current (CC). Two independent, yet complementary time Administration, Monterey, CA, USA series, CalCOFI ichthyoplankton surveys and sampling of southern California power 4 Institute of Marine Sciences, University of plant cooling-water intakes, have indicated that an assemblage of predominantly California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA 5MBC applied Environmental Sciences, cool-water affinity fishes spanning nearshore to oceanic environments in the south- Costa Mesa, CA, USA ern CCS has declined dramatically from the 1970s to the 2000s. We examined Correspondence potential oceanographic drivers behind this decline both within and north of the L. Siegelman-Charbit CalCOFI survey area in order to capture upstream processes as well. Empirical Email: [email protected] orthogonal function (EOF) analyses using output from a data-assimilative regional ocean model revealed significant relationships
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Reefs: Nothing More Than Benthic Fish Aggregators Jeffrey J
    POLOVINA: ARTIFICIAL REEFS: BENTHIC FISH AGGREGATORS ColCOFl Rep., Vol. 30,1989 ARTIFICIAL REEFS: NOTHING MORE THAN BENTHIC FISH AGGREGATORS JEFFREY J. POLOVINA Southwest Fisheries Center Honolulu Laboratory National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA 2570 Dole Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96822-2396 ABSTRACT lieve the real benefit of the reefs is that they aggre- The potential for artificial reefs to substantially gate wide-ranging fishes close to shore so they can increase standing stock of marine resources is con- be harvested by fishermen with small vessels and sidered. Three sources - the Japanese artificial reef thus keep the fleet of small vessels economically program; relationships between fishery production viable. and the area of natural habitat for several fisheries; Outside of Japan, artificial reefs have not been and population dynamics - offer evidence that ar- deployed on a large enough scale to evaluate their tificial reefs do not substantially increase the stand- effectiveness in increasing standing stocks. How- ing stock of marine resources. ever, examining the relationship between habitat and fishery production can provide estimates of the RESUMEN level of fishery yield per area of habitat that might be expected from appropriately designed and sited Se considera el potencial de 10s arrecifes artifi- artificial reefs. One example is penaeid shrimp: ciales para aumentar sustancialmente el stoc4 dis- worldwide fishery yields range from 8 to 200 kg/ ponible de 10s recursos marinos. Tres fuentes de hectare of intertidal nursery habitat (Turner 1977). evidencia: el programa de arrecifes artificiales ja- pods, la relaci6n entre producci6n y Area del hAbi- In the case of artificial reefs, yields are measured in production per unit of reef volume.
    [Show full text]
  • End-To-End Modeling of Sardine and Anchovy in the California Current System Calcofi Rep., Vol
    ROSE ET AL.: END-TO-END MODELING OF SARDINE AND ANCHOVY IN THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT SYSTEM CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 56, 2015 END-TO-END MODELING OF SARDINE AND ANCHOVY IN THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT SYSTEM KENNETH A. ROSE, SEAN CREEKMORE MIGUEL BERNAL DavE CHECKLEY Department of Oceanography General Fisheries Commission Scripps Institution of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences for the Mediterranean (GFCM) University of California, San Diego Louisiana State University FAO of the United Nations 9500 Gilman Drive Baton Rouge, LA 70803 Fisheries and Aquaculture Department La Jolla, CA 92093 ph: (225) 578-6346 Palazzo Blumenstihl [email protected] fax: (225) 578-6513 Via Vittoria Colonna 1 - 00193, Rome, Italy [email protected] [email protected] TONY KOSLOW [email protected] Scripps Institution of Oceanography, CalCOFI ALAN HAYNIE, 9500 Gilman Drive, Department 0218 JEROME FIECHTER BERNARD A. MEGREY (deceased) La Jolla, CA 92093 Institute of Marine Sciences Alaska Fisheries Science Center-NOAA [email protected] University of California, Santa Cruz 7600 Sand Point Way NE Santa Cruz, CA 95064 Seattle, WA 98115 SAM MCCLATCHIE, [email protected] [email protected] FRANCISCO WERNER Southwest Fisheries Science Center-NOAA ENRIQUE N. CURCHITSER SHIN-ICHI ITO 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive Department of Environmental Sciences Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute La Jolla, CA 92037-1508 and Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences University of Tokyo [email protected] Rutgers University Kashiwa-city, Chiba 277-8564, Japan [email protected] 14 College Farm Road [email protected] New Brunswick, NJ 08901 ALEC MacCALL [email protected] SalvadOR LLUCH-COTA Southwest Fisheries Science Center-NOAA CIBNOR 110 Shaffer Road KATE HEDSTROM Mar Bermejo #195 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Institute of Marine Science Col.
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRIBUTION of LARVAL SQUID, Lollgo OPALESCENS, in VARIOUS NEARSHORE LOCATIONS
    RECKSIEK AND KASHIWADA: DISTRIBUTION OF NEARSHORE LOLIGO OPALESCENS CalCOFI Rep., Vol. XX, 1979 DISTRIBUTION OF LARVAL SQUID, LOLlGO OPALESCENS, IN VARIOUS NEARSHORE LOCATIONS CONRAD W. RECKSIEK AND JERRY KASHIWADA Moss Landing Marine Laboratories P.O. BOX 223. Moss Landing, CA 95039 ABSTRACT estimated using an inclinometer and metered block. Three distinct sampling efforts employing different Mesh size decreased from about 6 mm at the mouth to a plankton-collecting gears aimed at collecting California cod-end liner of 1 mm. This gear was fished from Moss market squid, Loligo opalescens, in nearshore waters Landing Marine Laboratories research vessels Artemia from San Diego to Monterey Bay are described. Larval and Oconostota. Loligo opalescens occurrence in the hauls was low and Nearshore oblique tows in the upper 100 m were taken patchy, corroborating the experience of past workers. from San Diego to Morro Bay (Figure 1) in an attempt to Over the Monterey Jpawning grounds, the use of a spec- define geographical concentrations of larvae. These tows ially designed bottom-fishing plankton net was fouid to were made with a continuously open net similar in design be more generally effective than the other gears. to that used in Monterey Bay but with slightly larger mesh. In the case of operation in shallow water, the max- INTRODUCTION imum safe operation depth was shifted upward. In gen- The early life history of Loligo opalescens is unclear. eral, the net was allowed no lower than about 25 m from Fields (1965) suggests that the newly hatched larvae the bottom. Mesh sizes decreased from 9 mm to a cod- may be carried long distances by coastal currents.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Research and the Twentieth-Century Fishing Industry
    McEVOY: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE 20TH-CENTURY FISHING INDUSTRY CalCOFI Rep., Vol. XXIII, 1982 SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE TWENTIETH-CENTURY FISHING INDUSTRY ARTHUR F. McEVOY’ The 1981-82 California Sea Grant College Program Among natural scientists, Ciriacy-Wantrup set a directory includes two projects devoted to the history similar example in a 1952 text on resource conser- of public policymaking for the fisheries.’ This indi- vation, defining conservation as a dynamic process cates, I think, a new and salutary trend in the study influenced by social, economic, and political institu- and management of natural resources in the public tions as much as by the character of the resources domain. Long isolated in their various specializations, themselve~.~More recently, Richard A. Walker ad- scientists and scholars interested in natural resources monished us not to forget that we do not address re- have, since the 1960s, begun to look across discipli- source policy questions innocent of history, politics, nary boundaries for new perspectives on problems that or of “commitments to pre-existing threads of ideol- draw their common concern. They have also begun to ogy passed down from those who have grappled with examine their own role in the making of policy- similar problems before. ”6 Walker trenchantly ob- analyzing the ways in which scientists and other served that effective resource management requires scholars, successfully or not, have tried at various the understanding and manipulation of the human stages in our history to contribute their expertise to processes that lead people to use nature in particular developing government policy for resource use.
    [Show full text]
  • Calcofi Data Management, White Paper. Karen I
    UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography Technical Report Title CalCOFI Data Management, White Paper Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gr058dq Authors Stocks, Karen I Baker, Karen S Publication Date 2005-09-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California CalCOFI Data Management White Paper Karen I. Stocks1 and Karen S. Baker2 1San Diego Supercomputer Center, UCSD 2 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD Scripps Institution of Oceanography Technical Report September 2005 Table of Contents Purpose 1 Acknowledgements 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Current Management of CalCOFI Data 6 2.1 Hydrographic "bottle" dataset 6 2.2 Ichthyoplankton 8 2.3 Zooplankton 9 3. Evaluation of CalCOFI Data Management, Recommendations, and Recent Activities 10 3.1 Database software and organization 10 3.2 Backup and Archive 10 3.3 Metadata and Data Documentation 10 3.4 Data acquisition and processing 13 4. Developing an Integrated Access System 15 4.1 Organizational Considerations 15 Coordination of Development and Collaborative Design 16 Community Communication 16 4.2 Technical Considerations 18 Common Database Elements for Integration 18 Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Compatibility 19 Centralized Versus Distributed Systems 20 Data Contribution, Use, and Acknowledgement Policies 20 Standards 21 Assessing Available Tools 21 Hardware and Software 23 4.3 A Prototype Online Access System 24 5. Expanding Beyond Focus Data 25 5.1 Data Types 25 Discrete Data Acquired on CalCOFI Cruises on CalCOFI Stations 25 Continuous Data Acquired on CalCOFI Cruises on CalCOFI Stations 26 Continuous Data Acquired on CalCOFI Cruises between CalCOFI Stations 26 Raster/Grid Data in the CalCOFI Region 27 5.2 Data Inventory 28 6.
    [Show full text]