DOCSLIB.ORG

Asteraceae – Aster Family

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Asteraceae – Aster Family ASTERACEAE – ASTER FAMILY Plant: herbs (annual or perennial), some shrubs, rarely vines or trees. Stem: Root: Often with tubers, rhizomes, stolons, or fleshy roots Leaves: mostly simple, some compound, alternate or opposite, rarely whorled. Flowers: flower head supported by an involucre (whorl of green bracts or phyllaries); each head composed of small flowers (composite) of flat ray-like (ligulate) flowers on the outside (ray flowers) and central tube-like flowers (disk flowers) – some species may have only one or the other. Calyx absent or modified into hairs, bristles, scales or a crown (pappus); 5 stamens (syngenesious -united by anthers); 5 united petals (sympetalous), receptacle may also have hairs or bristles. Both pappus and receptacle hairs/bristles may be used in ID. Fruit: achene (small, one-seeded, inferior ovule, 2 carpels, hard shell fruit) often with persisting crowned pappus which helps with seed dispersal. Other: Very large family, divided into sub-families and tribes, once named Compositae; 1-2,000 genera, 20,000+ species. Dicotyledons Group WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive ASTERACEAE – ASTER FAMILY Straggler Daisy; Calyptocarpus vialis Less. (Introduced) Nodding [Plumeless] Thistle; Carduus nutans L. (Introduced) Garden Cornflower [Bachelor’s Button; Blue Bottle]; Centaurea cyanus L. (Introduced) Spotted Knapweed; Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek (Introduced) Woody [Bush] Goldenrod; Chrysoma pauciflosculosa (Michx.) Greene (Solidago pauciflosculosa) Green and Gold; Chrysogonum virginianum L. Soft Goldenaster; Chrysopsis pilosa Nutt. Chicory; Cichorium intybus L. (Introduced) Tall Thistle; Cirsium altissimum (L.) Hill Canada Thistle; Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Soft [Carolina] Thistle; Cirsium carolinianum (Walter) Fernald & B.G. Schub. Field [Pasture]Thistle; Cirsium discolor (Muhl. ex Willd.) Spreng. Yellow [Bristly; Horrid] Thistle; Cirsium horridulum Michx. var. horridulum Swamp [Fen] Thistle; Cirsium muticum Michx. Marsh [European] Swamp Thistle; Cirsium palustre (L.) Scop. (Introduced) Bull Thistle; Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. [Blue] Mist Flower; Conoclinium coelestinum (L.) DC. (Eupatorium coelestinum L.) Horseweed; Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. var. canadensis Dwarf Horseweed [Fleabane]; Conyza Conyza ramosissima Cronquist (Erigeron divaricatus Michx.) Largeflower Tickseed; Coreopsis grandiflora Hogg ex Sweet Lanceleaf [Sand] Tickseed [Coreopsis]; Coreopsis lanceolata L. Stiff Tickseed [Prairie Coreopsis]; Coreopsis palmata Nutt. Star Tickseed; Coreopsis pubescens Ell. Golden Tickseed [Coreopsis]; Coreopsis tinctoria Nutt. Tall Coreopsis [Tickseed]; Coreopsis tripteris L. Garden Cosmos; Cosmos bipinnatus Cav. (Introduced) Straggler Daisy USDA Calyptocarpus vialis Less. (Introduced) Asteraceae (Aster Family) San Antonio,Texas Note: ray flowers yellow, small (up to 1 cm) and notched, disk flowers yellow, bracts pointed, hairy; leaves ovate to more often deltoid, short petiolate, slightly toothed, densely hairy; stem with dense appressed hairs; often a sprawling lawn pest; summer to early fall [V Max Brown, 2010] Nodding [Plumeless] Thistle USDA Carduus nutans L. (Introduced) Asteraceae (Aster Family) Oak Opening Metropark, Lucas County, Ohio Notes: discoid; flower heads solitary, often nodding, pinkish-purple, bracts wide and spine-tipped, outer ones usually bent back (down), flower stalk is NOT winged; leaves deeply lobed and with spines; stem winged and spiny; summer to fall [V Max Brown, 2008] Garden Cornflower USDA [Bachelor’s Button; Blue Bottle] Centaurea cyanus L. (Introduced) Asteraceae (Aster Family) Friedrich Wilderness Park, Bexar County, Texas Notes: discoid; florets usually blue but can also be pink or white, bracts ovate lanceolate with triangular teeth (not spine-tipped), flower solitary on tips of branches; lower leaves with linear lobes, upper leaves mostly linear; stem and leaves very hairy especially when young; summer to early fall [V Max Brown, 2010] Spotted Knapweed USDA Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek (Introduced) Asteraceae (Aster Family) Newport, North Carolina Notes: discoid; white, pink or purple thistle-like flowers, solitary on tips of branches, base of flower covered with black-tipped fringed bracts (no spines); leaves divided into 2-4 pairs of narrow or linear segments, reduced upward; stem hairy especially when young, somewhat angled; summer to early fall [V Max Brown, 2006] Woody [Bush] Goldenrod USDA Chrysoma pauciflosculosa (Michx.) Greene (Solidago pauciflosculosa) Asteraceae (Aster Family) Point Washington State forest, Walton County, Florida Notes: evergreen shrub; ray and disc flowers yellow, disc tubular, inflorescence in dense terminal clusters above leaves; leaves alternate, sessile, entire, somewhat elliptical, glandular dotted, with a single vein; stem erect, woody and branched; most often in dunes and sand hills; spring to fall [V Max Brown, 2012] Green and Gold USDA Chrysogonum virginianum L. Asteraceae (Aster Family) Close Memorian Park, Greene County, Springfield, Missouri Note: ray flowers yellow, small (up to 1.5+ cm) and notched at tip (usually “toothed”), fertile, disk flowers yellow (sterile), 2 series of 5 bracts pointed, hairy; leaves opposite, ovate to lanceolate-ovate, crenate, and hairy, petioles hairy; fruit a black nutlet; often a sprawling plant; spring to early summer (a transplant to the gardens) [V Max Brown, 2014] Soft Goldenaster USDA Chrysopsis pilosa Nutt. Asteraceae (Aster Family) Alley Springs, Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Shannon County, Missouri Notes: ray flowers yellow (15-30),disc flowers yellow, bracts in 3-4 series, linear and sharp pointed; leaves alternate, oblong-lanceolate, pubescent, sessile to somewhat clasping, a few teeth or entire, more with teeth toward base of plant; stem with lines (grooved), short to long pubescent, some glandular; plant often somewhat “sticky”; summer to fall [V Max Brown, 2007] Chicory USDA Cichorium intybus L. (Introduced) Asteraceae (Aster Family) Maumee River Metroparks, Lucas County, Ohio Notes: ligulate; flowers sessile to very short-stalked, blue (rarely white or pink), many bracts in 2 series; basal and lower leaves lanceolate, sometimes shallowly lobed, toothed, somewhat pubescent to glabrous, much reduced upward; stem angled, slightly pubescent or not; summer to fall [V Max Brown, 2004] Tall Thistle USDA Cirsium altissimum (L.) Hill Asteraceae (Aster Family) Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield, Greene County, Missouri Notes: discoid; flower pink to purple, solitary, bracts with short spines, on short leafy pedicel; leaves lanceolate, with teeth or shallow lobes but not usually pinnatifid, margins with spines, white wooly beneath, mostly glabrous above or with some pubescence; stem ridged and pubescent but not winged or woolly pubescent; late summer to fall [V Max Brown, 2010] Canada [Field] Thistle USDA Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Asteraceae (Aster Family) Maumee River Metroparks, Lucas County, Ohio Notes: discoid; flower heads small and numerous in somewhat flat- topped clusters, pink to purple (rarely white), bracts with minute spines; leaves lanceolate to ovate-lanceolate, mostly lobed, usually with spines, leafy up the stem, pubescence variable; stem glabrous to somewhat hairy, NOT winged; plants often colonial; summer to fall [V Max Brown, 2004] Soft [Carolina] Thistle USDA Cirsium carolinianum (Walter) Fernald & B.G. Schub. Asteraceae (Aster Family) Greers Ferry Lake area, Cleburne County, Arkansas Notes: discoid; flower purple, solitary, bracts with short spines, on long pedicels; leaves lanceolate, with very shallow teeth or lobes and spines, white wooly beneath, mostly glabrous or slightly hairy above, most leaves in basal half; stem ridged and glabrous to slightly hairy but not winged or woolly; late spring to summer [V Max Brown, 2011] Field [Pasture] Thistle USDA Cirsium discolor (Muhl. ex Willd.) Spreng. Asteraceae (Aster Family) Oak Openings Metropark, Lucas County, Ohio Notes: discoid; flower pink to purple (sometimes white), solitary, bracts with spines; leaves deeply lobed, spiny, wooly white beneath, mostly glabrous above or with some hairs, small leaves often at base of flower; stem ridged and somewhat hairy, NOT winged or woolly; summer to fall [V Max Brown, 2005] Yellow [Bristly; Horrid] Thistle USDA Cirsium horridulum Michx. var. horridulum Asteraceae (Aster Family) Amelia Island, Nassau County, Florida Notes: discoid; flower creamy yellow to pink, purple and/or white, solitary, involucre bracts with spines (often tinged in red); leaves basal and cauline, pinnatifid, abundant spines, matted wooly white hairs above and below; stem not winged, leaf bases somewhat decurrent, stem with dense white wooly hairs (tomentose); erect plant; flatwoods to beaches and other environments; spring to summer [V Max Brown, 2013] Swamp [Fen] Thistle USDA Cirsium muticum Michx. Asteraceae (Aster Family) Oak Openings Metropark, Lucas County, Ohio Notes: discoid; flower pink to purple (rarely white), solitary on long pedicels, bracts without spines, usually covered with a cobweb-like pubescence; leaves deeply lobed or pennatifid, somewhat spiny on margins, green and somewhat hairy beneath, mostly glabrous above or with some hairs, leaves reduced upward on stem; stem ridged but not winged or woolly pubescent; tall plant (1-2 m); fens and wetter areas; late summer to fall [V Max Brown, 2008] Marsh [European] Swamp Thistle USDA Cirsium palustre (L.) Scop. (Introduced) Asteraceae (Aster
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chrysoma Pauciflosculosa Woody Goldenrod
    SGEB-75-4 Chrysoma pauciflosculosa woody goldenrod Asteraceae vegetative apical stem cuttings from summer softwood or winter hardwood root without auxin, but a 5,000 ppm IBA (Indole-3-butyric acid) application will increase root numbers and root length (Wilson et al. 2010). Propagation from seed for woody goldenrod has been accomplished with wild-collected seed. Seeds prefer cooler temperatures (20/10°C alternating day/night temperatures) to warmer ones (Wilson et al. 2010). Outplanting Rooted cuttings or seedlings may be grown in a variety of coarse production substrates and a variety of container sizes. Credit: Mack Thetford, UF/IFAS Smith et al. (2014) produced woody goldenrod in substrates such as Atlas 3000, Atlas 7000, Fafard 3B, and Metro Mix Woody goldenrod is found in beach dunes, scrub, and 300 while the authors have grown them in a 100% pine-bark sandhill plant communities. It occurs in the Panhandle of substrate amended with lime and slow-release fertilizer. Florida and more broadly in the southeastern United States Plants grown in 1-gal containers were evaluated for poten- west to Mississippi and northeast to North Carolina. This tial use in home landscapes with high transplant success plant may leach chemicals into the soil that inhibit seed (Smith et al. 2014). Peak flowering for the trial plants germination of gulf bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium occurred in November. var. scoparium) (Fischer et al. 1994). Woody goldenrod is an underused landscape plant with a prolific fall color from Literature Cited flowers that attract numerous pollinators. Fischer, N.H., G.B. Williamson, J.D. Weidenhamer, and General Description D.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province
    Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province Including the states of: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia And parts of: Georgia, Kentucky, and North Carolina, NAPPC South Carolina, Tennessee Table of CONTENTS Why Support Pollinators? 4 Getting Started 5 Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest 6 Meet the Pollinators 8 Plant Traits 10 Developing Plantings 12 Far ms 13 Public Lands 14 Home Landscapes 15 Bloom Periods 16 Plants That Attract Pollinators 18 Habitat Hints 20 This is one of several guides for Check list 22 different regions in the United States. We welcome your feedback to assist us in making the future Resources and Feedback 23 guides useful. Please contact us at [email protected] Cover: silver spotted skipper courtesy www.dangphoto.net 2 Selecting Plants for Pollinators Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Ecological Region of the Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province Including the states of: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia And parts of: Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee a nappc and Pollinator Partnership™ Publication This guide was funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the C.S. Fund, the Plant Conservation Alliance, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Bureau of Land Management with oversight by the Pollinator Partnership™ (www.pollinator.org), in support of the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC–www.nappc.org). Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest – Coniferous Forest – Meadow Province 3 Why support pollinators? In theIr 1996 book, the Forgotten PollInators, Buchmann and Nabhan estimated that animal pollinators are needed for the reproduction “ Farming feeds of 90% of flowering plants and one third of human food crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Barcoding the Asteraceae of Tennessee, Tribe Coreopsideae
    Schilling, E.E., N. Mattson, and A. Floden. 2014. Barcoding the Asteraceae of Tennessee, tribe Coreopsideae. Phytoneuron 2014-101: 1–6. Published 20 October 2014. ISSN 2153 733X BARCODING THE ASTERACEAE OF TENNESSEE, TRIBE COREOPSIDEAE EDWARD E. SCHILLING, NICHOLAS MATTSON, AARON FLODEN Herbarium TENN Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Results from barcoding studies of tribe Coreopsideae for the Tennessee flora using the nuclear ribosomal ITS marker are presented and include the first complete reports for 2 of the 20 species of the tribe that occur in the state, as well as updated reports for several others. Sequence data from the ITS region separate most of the species of Bidens in Tennessee from one another, but species of Coreopsis, especially those of sect. Coreopsis, have ITS sequences that are identical (or nearly so) to at least one congener. Comparisons of sequence data to GenBank records are complicated by apparent inaccuracies of older sequences as well as potentially misidentified samples. Broad survey of C. lanceolata from across its range showed little variability, but the ITS sequence of a morphologically distinct sample from a Florida limestone glade area was distinct in lacking a length polymorphism that was present in other samples. Tribe Coreopsideae is part of the Heliantheae alliance and earlier was often included in an expanded Heliantheae (Anderberg et al. 2007) in which it was usually treated as a subtribe (Crawford et al. 2009). The tribe shows a small burst of diversity in the southeastern USA involving Bidens and Coreopsis sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Coreopsideae Daniel J
    Chapter42 Coreopsideae Daniel J. Crawford, Mes! n Tadesse, Mark E. Mort, "ebecca T. Kimball and Christopher P. "andle HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND PHYLOGENY In a cladistic analysis of morphological features of Heliantheae by Karis (1993), Coreopsidinae were reported Morphological data to be an ingroup within Heliantheae s.l. The group was A synthesis and analysis of the systematic information on represented in the analysis by Isostigma, Chrysanthellum, tribe Heliantheae was provided by Stuessy (1977a) with Cosmos, and Coreopsis. In a subsequent paper (Karis and indications of “three main evolutionary lines” within "yding 1994), the treatment of Coreopsidinae was the the tribe. He recognized ! fteen subtribes and, of these, same as the one provided above except for the follow- Coreopsidinae along with Fitchiinae, are considered ing: Diodontium, which was placed in synonymy with as constituting the third and smallest natural grouping Glossocardia by "obinson (1981), was reinstated following within the tribe. Coreopsidinae, including 31 genera, the work of Veldkamp and Kre# er (1991), who also rele- were divided into seven informal groups. Turner and gated Glossogyne and Guerreroia as synonyms of Glossocardia, Powell (1977), in the same work, proposed the new tribe but raised Glossogyne sect. Trionicinia to generic rank; Coreopsideae Turner & Powell but did not describe it. Eryngiophyllum was placed as a synonym of Chrysanthellum Their basis for the new tribe appears to be ! nding a suit- following the work of Turner (1988); Fitchia, which was able place for subtribe Jaumeinae. They suggested that the placed in Fitchiinae by "obinson (1981), was returned previously recognized genera of Jaumeinae ( Jaumea and to Coreopsidinae; Guardiola was left as an unassigned Venegasia) could be related to Coreopsidinae or to some Heliantheae; Guizotia and Staurochlamys were placed in members of Senecioneae.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2021 Volume 38, Number 4
    April 2021 Volume 38, Number 4 This is an online meeting. We will send you a link the day before the meeting. We will be back with in-person meetings as soon as our venues are open and safe. April 21, 7:00 pm Program Carex By Randy Mears The genus Carex is contained within the Family Cyperaceae (Sedge Family). Ironically, it is one of the least known genera to most people and happens to be the largest genus of flowering plants in the United States with more than 500 species represented. The unifying character of all Carex species is a structure called the perigynium which is a modified scale with fused margins which surrounds the pistillate flowers and is only open at the tip. This structure is paramount for separating all Carex species from one another. There are currently 73 species known to occur within the state of Florida. This presentation will, in large part, be a photographic introduction to most of the species that occur in Florida. Randy Mears is a Florida native born in Plant City. He has been studying Florida native plant species for more than 30 years and has become especially interested in grasses and sedges. He is a wonderful person to have show up a field trip since his knowledge of the sedge- family plants comes with lots of field experience. Randy is a Perigynia on Carex intumescens. Photo by Shirley member of the Suncoast chapter. Denton. 1 Plant Sale at USF Botanical Garden USF again had to cancel its plant sale. We have been invited by the USF Botanical Gardens to have our own Suncoast Chapter plant sale at the botanical gardens on April 10.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialist Foragers in Forest Bee Communities Are Small, Social Or Emerge Early
    Received: 5 November 2018 | Accepted: 2 April 2019 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13003 RESEARCH ARTICLE Specialist foragers in forest bee communities are small, social or emerge early Colleen Smith1,2 | Lucia Weinman1,2 | Jason Gibbs3 | Rachael Winfree2 1GraDuate Program in Ecology & Evolution, Rutgers University, New Abstract Brunswick, New Jersey 1. InDiviDual pollinators that specialize on one plant species within a foraging bout 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution, and transfer more conspecific and less heterospecific pollen, positively affecting plant Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey reproDuction. However, we know much less about pollinator specialization at the 3Department of Entomology, University of scale of a foraging bout compared to specialization by pollinator species. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanaDa 2. In this stuDy, we measured the Diversity of pollen carried by inDiviDual bees forag- Correspondence ing in forest plant communities in the miD-Atlantic United States. Colleen Smith Email: [email protected] 3. We found that inDiviDuals frequently carried low-Diversity pollen loaDs, suggest- ing that specialization at the scale of the foraging bout is common. InDiviDuals of Funding information Xerces Society for Invertebrate solitary bee species carried higher Diversity pollen loaDs than Did inDiviDuals of Conservation; Natural Resources social bee species; the latter have been better stuDied with respect to foraging Conservation Service; GarDen Club of America bout specialization, but account for a small minority of the worlD’s bee species. Bee boDy size was positively correlated with pollen load Diversity, and inDiviDuals HanDling EDitor: Julian Resasco of polylectic (but not oligolectic) species carried increasingly Diverse pollen loaDs as the season progresseD, likely reflecting an increase in the Diversity of flowers in bloom.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Plant Patent (10) Patent N0.: US PP19,306 P2 Hawks (45) Date of Patent: Oct
    USO0PP19306P2 (12) United States Plant Patent (10) Patent N0.: US PP19,306 P2 Hawks (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 7, 2008 (54) CHRYSOGONUM PLANT NAMED ‘QUINN’S (52) US. Cl. ..................................................... .. Plt./373 GOLD’ (58) Field of Classi?cation Search .... .. Flt/373 See application ?le for complete search history. (50) Latin Name: Chrysogonum virginianum _ _ Varietal Denomination: Quinn’s Gold Prlmary ExamnferiAnnene H Para_ Asszslanl Exammeris. B. McCormick-Ewoldt (76) Inventor: Kimberly T. Hawks, 2056 Crawford (74) A210" "6)’; Agent) 0" Firmipenny J~ Aguirre 0‘) Notice? sublectfo any di5C1aimer,_thetermOfthi5 A new cultivar of Chrysogonum virginianum, ‘Quinn’s Pawnt 15 extended Or adlusted under 35 Gold’, characterized by its ?owers that emerge gold in color U-S~C~ 154(1)) by 0 days- and change with maturity to yellow and creamy white imparting the appearance of multicolored ?owers, its long (21) Appl. No.: 11/906,656 blooming habit, its vigorous growth habit, its ease of _ _ propagation, its drought tolerance and its hardiness in at (22) Flled' Oct‘ 4’ 2007 least U.S.D.A. Zones 5 to 9. (51) Int. Cl. A01H 5/00 (2006.01) 2 Drawing Sheets 1 2 Botanical classi?cation: Chrysogonum virginianum. 6. ‘Quinn’s Gold’ is cold hardy at least in U.S.D.A. Zones Variety denomination: ‘Quinn’s Gold’. 5 to 9. The new Chrysogonum is unique in comparison to other BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION cultivars and species of Chrysogonum known to the inventor. 5 The parent plants, unnamed plants of Chrysogonum The present mvent1on relates to a new and d1 stmct cultivar virginianum, produce ?owers that are gold throughout devel of Chrysogonum virginianum and will be referred to hereaf opment and do not lighten to yellow and creamy white as ter by its cultivar name, ‘Quinn’s Gold’.
    [Show full text]