DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX I Scenic Visual Analysis and Historic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APPENDIX I Scenic Visual Analysis and Historic • APA Visual Impact Analysis Methodology I2-3 • National Historic Landmark Designation I4-12 • Scenic Byway Designation: State Highway Law, Article 12-C, Section 349 I13-21 I- 1 Visual Impact Assessment Methodology Agency and Department staff will consult on the need for a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA). Typically, VIAs would only be required in major reconstruction projects where there is a substantial visual change proposed in the highway corridor, or where the Department is proposing new or out-of-kind replacement buildings, bridges or other structures, or where there is significant vegetative cutting along State highways. The Department (and its Consultants, as appropriate) shall prepare a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) of significant visual resources in accordance with current NYSDOT visual assessment policy. The VIA shall be prepared by or under the direct guidance of a registered landscape architect experienced in VIA preparation. In addition to the general methodology and subtasks outlined below, the Department shall consult with the Agency regarding any project-specific methodology and subtasks before starting the work. The Department shall prepare appropriate viewshed mapping for existing conditions, each design alternative, and the null alternative (wherever null alternative viewsheds at the design year would differ significantly from existing conditions) to define the physical limits of the affected visual environment. Delineate the relevant viewsheds on a 7.5 minute topographic map: Foreground (0 to 0.5 mile), middleground (0.5 to 3.5 miles) and background (3.5 to 5 miles). Indicate the location of all public use areas on this map. The Department shall identify each viewer group within the project area and determine the viewer exposure and viewer sensitivity of each group. The Department shall consult with the Agency to identify the key views and the range of significant visual resources for each viewer group. Agency staff should be present of any in-field analysis. Key views shall include the views of the project that best represent the visual environment for each design alternative. The Department shall prepare high quality representative photographs from each identified viewing location (i.e., photo station) keyed to the maps and showing both existing and proposed/simulated views. At least two, 8-1/2 inch x 11 inch photographs using 55mm and 85mm camera lenses should be provided from each photo station. Also provide GPS coordinates for each station. A third photograph using a 120mm or greater camera lens is recommended for each photo station to aid in the development of simulations. Higher camera lenses are also useful to simulate closer views from bodies of water when boats are not available or practical to take actual photographs from the water. All photographs should be labeled or indexed to a table describing the location the photograph was taken from and the size (mm) of the camera lens used. I- 2 The Department shall consult with the Agency to determine what constitutes sufficient detail for producing quality simulations, e. g., pavement delineation, guide rail, traffic control devices (overhead signs, signals, etc.), structure type (truss vs. contemporary), sidewalks, side roads, and any enhancements. Based on this information the Department shall produce the visual simulations and shall review initial drafts of them with the Agency before they are finalized. The Department shall assess the visual impacts of each design alternative and the null alternative, including changes to significant visual resources and probable viewer response to these changes. As agreed to in advance with Agency staff, separate representative line of sight profiles of actual visibility from each viewing location/photo station depicting the proposed structure, existing topography and heights of intervening vegetation may be required. The VIA shall include measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate negative visual impacts and to enhance positive impacts. Descriptions and costs of these measures shall be in sufficient detail for incorporation into the preliminary design and for use in evaluating relative advantages and disadvantages among the alternatives. The Department shall document this study in a Visual Impact Assessment report, to be presented as a technical appendix to the application made to the Agency. This report shall include color copies of the simulations. When mutually agreed upon, the Department shall submit a draft of this VIA report to the Agency in advance for preliminary review. The Department shall revise the draft report per Agency review comments before incorporating it into the application and Design Approval Document. I- 3 I- 4 I- 5 I- 6 I- 7 I- 8 I- 9 I- 10 I- 11 I- 12 Scenic Byway Designation: State Highway Law, Article 12-C, Section 349 Adirondack Trail Adirondack Trail Route Segments: Route I.D.: From: To: Route: Length: 30 22061 0.00 83.80 NY 30 83.80 30 72071 0.00 1.24 NY 30 1.24 30A21032 0.00 3.23 NY 30A 3.23 30A21031 0.00 0.65 NY 30A 0.65 30A21034 0.00 5.62 NY 30A 5.62 30A21033 0.00 1.26 NY 30A 1.26 30 72091 0.00 66.82 NY 30 66.82 30 75081 0.00 0.59 NY 30 0.59 30 21051 9.70 22.55 NY 30 12.85 30A25021 13.70 16.15 NY 30A 2.45 New York State Highway Law: Portion of State Highway System to be designated and known as the "Adirondack Trail": All that portion of the State Highway System beginning at Malone, traveling south on Route 30 through Lake Clear, Tupper Lake, Long Lake and Speculator; continuing from Speculator south on Route 30 through Wells and Northville to Riceville; continuing south from Riceville on Route 30A terminating at Route 5 in Fonda. I- 13 Scenic Byway Designation: State Highway Law, Article 12-C, Section 349 Central Adirondack Trail Central Adirondack Trail Route Segments: Route I.D.: From: To: Route: Length: 365 26013 0.00 11.95 NY 365 11.95 28 17101 0.00 21.43 NY 28 21.43 28 23081 0.00 20.78 NY 28 20.78 28 22091 0.00 49.30 NY 28 49.30 9 17102 0.00 17.09 US 9 17.09 L00058 0.00 1.27 L00058 1.27 28 26071 4.93 30.03 NY 28 25.10 46 26022 5.02 5.15 NY 46 0.13 365 26012 7.02 9.59 NY 365 2.57 New York State Highway Law: Portion of State Highway System to be designated and known as the "Central Adirondack Trail": All that portion of the State Highway System beginning at the Hudson River Bridge on Route 9 between the village of Glens Falls and the City of Glens Falls, continuing north on Route 9 to Lake George; continuing north from Lake George on Route 9 through Warrensburg; continuing northwest from Warrensburg on Routes 9 and 28 through North Creek and North River to Indian Lake; continuing west from Indian Lake on Routes 28 and 30 to Blue Mountain Lake; continuing southwest on Route 28 from Blue Mountain Lake through Inlet, Eagle Bay, Old Forge and Thendara to Woodgate; continuing southwest from Woodgate on Route 28 through Forestport to Alder Creek; continuing south from Alder Creek on Routes 28 and 12 to Barneveld; continuing southwest from Barneveld on Route 365 through Holland Patent to Rome, terminating at the Route 46, 69, 49 overlap in Rome. I- 14 Scenic Byway Designation: State Highway Law, Article 12-C, Section 349 Roosevelt Marcy Trail Roosevelt - Marcy Memorial Highway Segments: Route I.D.: From: To: Route: Length: 28N17031 0.00 4.54 NY 28N 4.54 28N12021 0.00 26.81 NY 28N 26.81 28N22011 10.60 19.60 NY 28N 9.00 New York State Highway Law: Portion of State Highway System to be designated and known as the "Roosevelt - Marcy Memorial Highway": All that portion of the State Highway System identified as running from the hamlet of North Creek in the county of Warren through the hamlets of Minerva and Newcomb in the county of Essex to the hamlet of Long Lake in the county of Hamilton shall be designated and known as the "Roosevelt - Marcy Memorial Highway". I- Olympic15 Byway Scenic Byway Designation: State Highway Law, Article 12-C, Section 349 Olympic Byway Segments: Route I.D.: From: To: Route: Length: 3 74041 0.00 11.43 NY 3 11.43 3 73033 0.00 10.78 NY 3 10.78 3 73032 0.00 4.20 NY 3 4.20 3 72061 0.00 25.41 NY 3 25.41 9N71041 0.00 11.82 NY 9N 11.82 86 12021 0.00 26.71 NY 86 26.71 3A73011 0.00 5.18 NY 3A 5.18 3 75051 0.00 54.89 NY 3 54.89 86 72011 12.40 12.46 NY 86 0.06 3 73033 20.58 26.15 NY 3 5.57 3 73031 23.62 29.25 NY 3 5.63 9N12031 61.41 67.39 NY 9N 5.98 New York State Highway Law: Portion of State Highway System to be designated and known as the "Olympic Byway": All that portion of the State Highway System beginning at the intersection of Route 180 and Route 3, continuing east on Route 3 through Watertown to Deferiet; continuing east from Deferiet on Route 3A to Fargo; continuing northeast from Fargo on Route 3 through Natural Bridge, Harrisville, Fine, Star Lake, and Cranberry Lake to Tupper Lake; continuing northeast from Tupper Lake on Route 3 to Saranac Lake; continuing east on Route 86 from Saranac Lake through Ray Brook; Lake Placid, and Jay; continuing northeast from Jay on Route 9N and terminating at Route 9 in Keeseville.
Recommended publications
  • Bovina Township Delaware County New York Burial Data Compiled from the Papers of David F. Hoy & Howard F. Davidson The

    Bovina Township Delaware County New York Burial Data Compiled from the Papers of David F. Hoy & Howard F. Davidson The

    BOVINA TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY NEW YORK BURIAL DATA COMPILED FROM THE PAPERS OF DAVID F. HOY & HOWARD F. DAVIDSON & THE BOVINA CEMETERY ASSOCIATION Prepared By The Davidson Brothers: Edwin, Allan, Richard 01 February 2004 Up-dated September 13, 2015 M/S Word – Bovina Cemeteries Intro Page 1 09/27/15 This data has been transcribed with the utmost care - however no guarantee of accuracy is given. This information has been gleaned from various tombstone readings, Bovina New UP interment records (from 1910), 1855 and 1905 Bovina Census and the genealogy notes from the sources provided in “Early Bovina Families & their Descendants”. A few individuals appear to be buried in two locations. When David F. Hoy did his readings (1914-1918) I am certain that the tombstones were there. Some families moved their loved ones to the new cemetery before the Cemetery Association incorporated (1910) and no known record of the transfer exists, but the tombstones were read in the Bovina New UP Cemetery also. Please check this information against your other sources. We dedicate this database to the memory of our brother Allan Lloyd Davidson - 23 Oct 1925 – 10 Feb 2004 GPS Coordinates of Bovina Burial Sites M/S Word – Bovina Cemeteries Intro Page 2 09/27/15 * = Vacated [UPDATED Using Google Earth using Degrees-Minutes-Seconds] Elevation 1 - ARCHIBALD CEMETERY 42º 16’ 56.93” N 074º 42’ 09.66” W 2056 Feet 2 - BALLENTYNE CEMETERY 42º 16’ 34.06” N 074º 44’ 18.04” W 1975 Feet 3 - BLACK CEMETERY (Approx) 42º 15’ 11.13” N 074º 45’ 40.38” W 1949 Feet 4 - BRUSH CEMETERY
  • WSP Report 2012

    WSP Report 2012

    Watershed Stewardship Program Summary of Programs and Research 2012 Watershed Stewardship Program Report # AWI 2013-01 Executive Summary and Introduction 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary and Introduction........................................................................................................... 4 West-Central Adirondack Region Summary ............................................................................................... 17 Staff Profiles ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Chateaugay Lake Boat Launch Use Report ................................................................................................. 29 Cranberry Lake Boat Launch Use Study ...................................................................................................... 36 Fourth Lake Boat Launch Use Report ......................................................................................................... 45 Lake Flower and Second Pond Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................. 58 Lake Placid State and Village Boat Launch Use Study ................................................................................. 72 Long Lake Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................................................. 84 Meacham Lake Campground Boat Launch Use Study ...............................................................................
  • Visit Hunter/Tannersville!

    Visit Hunter/Tannersville!

    Catskill Mountain Region AUGUST 2018 COMPLIMENTARY GUIDE catskillregionguide.com SPECIAL SECTION: VISIT HUNTER/TANNERSVILLE! August 2018 • GUIDE 1 TABLE OF www.catskillregionguide.com CONTENTS VOLUME 33, NUMBER 8 August 2018 PUBLISHERS Peter Finn, Chairman, Catskill Mountain Foundation Sarah Finn, President, Catskill Mountain Foundation EDITORIAL DIRECTOR, CATSKILL MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION Sarah Taft ADVERTISING SALES Rita Adami, Barbara Cobb Steve Friedman CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Anne Donovan, Stephanie Goff, Harry G. Jameson III, Heather Rolland, Jeff Senterman & Robert Tomlinson ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE Candy McKee Justin McGowan & Isabel Cunha PRINTING Catskill Mountain Printing Services DISTRIBUTION Catskill Mountain Foundation On the cover: Sam’s Point Trail in Ellenville, Ulster County. Photo courtesy of Ulster County Tourism EDITORIAL DEADLINE FOR NEXT ISSUE: August 10 The Catskill Mountain Region Guide is published 12 times a year by the Catskill Mountain Foundation, Inc., Main Street, PO Box 4 THE ARTS 924, Hunter, NY 12442. If you have events or programs that you would like to have covered, please send them by e-mail to tafts@ catskillmtn.org. Please be sure to furnish a contact name and in- 8 SECOND ANNUAL WOMEN’S EXPO AT ST. THERESA’S clude your address, telephone, fax, and e-mail information on all correspondence. For editorial and photo submission guidelines IN WINDHAM THIS AUGUST By Anne Donovan & Stephanie Goff send a request via e-mail to [email protected]. The liability of the publisher for any error for which it may be held legally responsible will not exceed the cost of space ordered FALLA! Two Masterpieces by the Great Spanish Composer or occupied by the error.
  • Appendix 1 Economic Impact Study of the Gore Mountain Interconnect

    Appendix 1 Economic Impact Study of the Gore Mountain Interconnect

    APPENDIX 1 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY OF THE GORE MOUNTAIN INTERCONNECT OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER Econotnic ltnpact Study of the Gore Mountain Interconnect Ala11 G. Hevesi : TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 Ski Industry History and Trends 4 Gore Mountain 5 Economic Impact Analysis 7 Development in the Adirondacks 9 Environmental Considerations 10 Appendix A - Skier Visits by Region 11 Appendix B - Skier Visits by Ski Resort 12 Appendix C - Weather and the Ski Industry 13 Appendix D - Land Use Definition and Intensity Guidelines 15 Appendix E - The UMP Process 16 Appendix F - Adirondack Park Agency Response 17 Appendix G - OSC Contacts 22 EcoNoMic l:MPACT STUDY OF THE GoRE MoUNTAIN "INTERCONNECT" Executive Summary The purpose ofthis study is to evaluate the economic impact ofthe construction and development of the ski lifts and trails that will, in effect, "interconnect" the Hamlet of North Creek, NY, with the main trail network of Gore Mountain Ski Center. Our study makes projections, based on ski industry statistical data, assessing the monetary impact of the development on the regional economy, which appears to be significant. It does not contain an analysis of the cost of constructing the interconnect. The Hamlet of North Creek and Gore Mountain have a rich skiing history. Many ofthe first ski trails were created from the old tote roads used to extract lumber and garnet ore on the area now referred to as the "Ski Bowl." This section ofthe mountain, opening in 1932, became one ofthe first ski areas in the country. In this era, skiers from Manhattan and beyond were delivered to North Creek by ski train.
  • 2018 Draft Amendment to the Blue Ridge Wilderness

    2018 Draft Amendment to the Blue Ridge Wilderness

    BLUE RIDGE WILDERNESS Draft Amendment to the 2006 Blue Ridge Wilderness Unit Management Plan NYS DEC, REGION 5, DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS 701 South Main St., Northville, NY 12134 [email protected] www.dec.ny.gov November 2018 Introduction The Blue Ridge Wilderness Area (BRWA) is located in the towns of Indian Lake, Long Lake, Arietta, and Lake Pleasant and the Village of Speculator within Hamilton County. The unit is 48,242 acres in size. A Unit Management Plan (UMP) for this area was completed in 2006. This UMP Amendment contains one proposal: Construction of the Seventh Lake Mountain – Sargent Ponds Multiple-Use Trail. Management Proposal Construction of the Seventh Lake Mountain – Sargent Ponds Multiple-Use Trail Background: During the planning efforts that led to the drafting and adoption of the Moose River Plains Wild Forest (MRPWF) UMP, it was realized that there is a great need for new, land-based snowmobile trail connections in the area. As a result, the 2011 MRPWF UMP put forth a conceptual proposal for a snowmobile trail leading eastward and north of MRPWF that would connect to the Sargent Ponds Wild Forest (SPWF) trail system—pending the adoption of a SPWF UMP. Ultimately, the Seventh Lake Mountain – Sargent Ponds Multiple-Use Trail will provide a land-based connection between the communities of Indian Lake, Raquette Lake, Inlet, and Long Lake. The proposed trail system will greatly reduce rider’s risk associated with lake crossings and traveling along and crossing major roads. Management Action: This UMP amendment proposes construction of a portion of the Seventh Lake Mountain – Sargent Ponds Multiple-Use Trail and its maintenance as a Class II Community Connector Trail.
  • Shandaken Wild Forest Unit Management Plan

    Shandaken Wild Forest Unit Management Plan

    SHANDAKEN WILD FOREST Draft Unit Management Plan NYSDEC, REGION 3, DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS 21 South Putt Corners Rd, New Paltz, NY 12561 [email protected] www.dec.ny.gov August 2020 This page intentionally left blank Preface The draft revision to the 2005 Shandaken Wild Forest Unit Management Plan has been developed pursuant to, and is consistent with, relevant provisions of the New York State Constitution, the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL), the Executive Law, the Catskill State Park State Land Master Plan (CPSLMP), New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“Department”) rules and regulations, Department policies and procedures and the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The State lands that are the subject of this draft Unit Management Plan (UMP) are Forest Preserve lands protected by Article XIV, Section1 of the New York State Constitution. This Constitutional provision, which became effective on January 1,1885 provides in relevant part: “The lands of the state, now owned or hereafter acquired, constituting the Forest Preserve as now fixed by law, shall be forever kept as wild forest lands. They shall not be leased, sold or exchanged, or be taken by any corporation, public or private, nor shall the timber thereon be sold, removed or destroyed.” ECL§3-030 (1)(d) and 9-0105(1) provides the Department with jurisdiction to manage Forest Preserve lands. The Catskill Park State Land Master Plan (Master Plan) places State land within the Catskill State Park into the following classifications: Wilderness, Wild Forest, Primitive Bicycle Corridor, Intensive Use and State Administrative and sets forth management guidelines for the lands falling within each major classification.
  • Long Lake • Raquette Lake • Blue Mountain • Newcomb • Tupper Lake • Indian Lake

    Long Lake • Raquette Lake • Blue Mountain • Newcomb • Tupper Lake • Indian Lake

    North Country Regional Economic Development Council Tourism Destination Area Nomination Workbook New York’s North Country Region North Country New York [TOURISM DESTINATION AREA NOMINATION WORKBOOK] Why is tourism important to the North Country? Tourism offers the most viable opportunity to diversity and ignite the North Country economy by capitalizing on existing demand to attract a wide variety of private investment that will transform communities. Tourism is already a $1 billion industry in the North Country and with its low upfront investment cost and quicker return on investment that many other industries, it is well- positioned to drive a new North Country economy as well as complement other strategic clusters of economic activity. Year-round tourism promotes a more sustainable, stable economy and more jobs; it’s the most likely growth industry for this region and will help recruit other types of investment. The region has a history of hospitality and several successful tourism hubs in place and exceptional four-season outdoor recreational opportunities are poised to leverage private investment in lodging, restaurant, attraction and other types of tourism related venues. Recognizing the transformative potential that tourism has in the North Country, the Regional Economic development Council is advancing the following strategies: Put tools in place to attract private investment in tourism which will drive demand to revitalize and diversity communities and create a climate that will allow entrepreneurs to flourish. Develop tourism infrastructure to transform the Region by driving community development and leveraging private investment in tourism destination area communities and corridors. The key to these strategies is that they recognize and focus attention on the need to attract and foster development in attractions, facilities and infrastructure conducive to attracting the 21st century traveling public.
  • Essex Chain Lakes Management Complex Plan

    Essex Chain Lakes Management Complex Plan

    ESSEX CHAIN LAKES MANAGEMENT COMPLEX PLAN Unit Management Plans Essex Chain Lakes Primitive Area Pine Lake Primitive Area Unit Management Plan Amendments 1995 Blue Mountain Wild Forest Unit Management Plan 2005 Vanderwhacker Mountain Wild Forest Unit Management Plan River Area Management Plans Hudson River Cedar River Final Environmental Impact Statement NYS DEC, REGION 5, DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS 232 Golf Course Road, Warrensburg, NY 12885 [email protected] www.dec.ny.gov March 2016 This page intentionally left blank OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER New York State Department of £:nvironm ental Conservation 625 Broadway, 14th Floor. Albany. New York 12233•1010 P: (518) 402·8545 I F: (518) 402·8541 ww·w.dec.ny.gov M E M O R A N D U M TO: The Record FROM: Basil Seggos SUBJECT: Essex Chain Lakes Management Complex The Essex Chain Lakes Management Complex Plan has been completed. The Plan serves as a Unit Management Plan for the Essex Chain Lakes Primitive Area and the Pine Lake Primitive Area, and as an amendment to Unit Management Plans for the Blue Mountain Wild Forest and the Vanderwhacker Mountain Wild Forest. The Adirondack Park Agency has found the Plan to be in conformance with the Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan. The Plan is consistent with Environmental Conservation Law, and Department Rules, Regulations and Policies and is hereby approved and adopted. ______________________________________________ Basil Seggos Acting Commissioner New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Date: __________________________ EWYORK Department of ..........."°' Envlronmenttal 4 Conservation This page intentionally left blank wvoRK TEOF Adirondack oAruN,rv.
  • Pavement Preservation Program 2015-2016 Project Solicitation

    Pavement Preservation Program 2015-2016 Project Solicitation

    Adirondack / Glens Falls Transportation Council Pavement Preservation Program 2015‐2016 Project Solicitation Introduction The Adirondack / Glens Falls Transportation Council is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Planning and Programming Area that includes Warren County, Washington County, and the Town of Moreau and Village of South Glens Falls In Saratoga County. MPOs are responsible for administering a cooperative and continuing regional transportation planning process. A principal component of that process is capital programming for federally‐ funded transportation improvement projects. A/GFTC is seeking project candidates for its Pavement Preservation Program. This program consists of annual funding setasides dedicated for maintenance and preservation projects intended to prevent the deterioration of roadways that are presently in good to fair condition. The intent of the program is to encourage municipalities to actively engage in preventative maintenance strategies that reduce the need for more costly infrastructure replacement and major rehabilitation projects. Programming Levels A/GFTC has programmed $1,591,000 in matched federal Surface Transportation Program funds for pavement preservation projects that are to be obligated during Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2015‐2016. Additionally, $164,000 in matched funds has been programmed for FFY 2014‐2015 for any required design associated with the selected projects. A local match of 20% is required in order to access design and construction funds. The potential availability of Marchiselli funding, a State program that covers 75% of the required local match for federal aid transportation projects, could reduce the required local match to 5% of the overall project cost. Eligible Roadways All projects must be sponsored by a local municipality (Village, City, Town or County).
  • 2015 03 10 Truck Book April 2015 Final.Pdf

    2015 03 10 Truck Book April 2015 Final.Pdf

    OFFICIAL DESCRIPTION OF DESIGNATED QUALIFYING AND ACCESS HIGHWAYS IN NEW YORK STATE APRIL 2015 New York State Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Safety & Mobility 50 Wolf Road, POD 53 Albany, New York 12232 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 ALLOWABLE WIDTHS AND LENGTHS REFERENCE CHART ............................................ 2 53’ TRAILER ROUTES IN NEW YORK CITY ........................................................................... 3 2015 NYC LAW EXPANDING 53’ TRAILER ROUTES IN NYC ............................................. 4 COUNTIES AND REGIONAL OFFICES ..................................................................................... 5 COMMUNICATION DIRECTORY .............................................................................................. 6 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ 7 ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION............................................................................. 7 RESTRICTION CODES ................................................................................................................ 8 NATIONAL NETWORK (i.e. QUALIFYING HIGHWAYS) ...................................................... 9 QUALIFYING AND ACCESS HIGHWAYS - INTERSTATE ROUTES ................................. 16 QUALIFYING AND ACCESS HIGHWAYS
  • 3. Affected Environment

    3. Affected Environment

    Draft Champlain Hudson Power Express EIS 3. Affected Environment This section provides a description of the existing environment within the proposed CHPE Project area. To facilitate discussion, this EIS divides the approximately 336-mile (541-km) proposed transmission line route into four segments: Lake Champlain Segment (Section 3.1), Overland Segment (Section 3.2), Hudson River Segment (Section 3.3), and New York City Metropolitan Area Segment (Section 3.4). This division is based on geographical and environmental similarities along the route, as described in Section 2.4.1. The Lake Champlain and Hudson River segments contain primarily aquatic corridors, the Overland Segment contains primarily terrestrial corridors, and the New York City Metropolitan Area Segment is a combination of aquatic and terrestrial corridors. The potential impacts associated with constructing and operating the proposed CHPE Project are discussed in Chapter 5 based on the environmental resource areas described in the following sections. Brief definitions of each resource area; laws, regulations, and guidelines potentially applicable to the resource; and existing conditions are discussed for each segment, as appropriate. A region of influence (ROI) for each resource area in which impacts would likely occur is also defined. The ROIs were determined based on regulatory requirements, where applicable, combined with the expected maximum area of measurable construction or operational impacts for that particular resource. 3.1 Lake Champlain Segment 3.1.1 Land Use 3.1.1.1 Background on the Resource Area This section describes existing land uses in the vicinity of the proposed CHPE Project route, and land use plans and policies applicable to the proposed CHPE Project area.
  • Raquette River Corridor Blueway Trail Plan

    Raquette River Corridor Blueway Trail Plan

    peter j. smith & company, inc. Raquette River Corridor Blueway Trail Plan Acknowledgements Advisory Committee Members The following individuals provided guidance for this project by attending Advisory Committee meetings and by providing comments on draft products: Louise Bixby – Raquette River River Corridor Project, Advisory Committee Member Joann E. Ferris – Coordinator, Raquette River Corridor Project, Town of Colton Sally Gross – The Wild Center Fred Hanss – Village of Potsdam Sue Ellen Herne – Akwesasne Museum and Cultural Center Jon Kopp – Tupper Lake Historian Jim McFaddin – St. Lawrence County Legislator; Norwood Lake Association Ruth McWilliams – Catamount Lodge & Forest, LLC James Murphy – Department of Economic Development, Village of Potsdam Dan Parker – Brookfield Renewable Power Mike Prescott – Guide, Northern Forest Canoe Trail Bill Swafford – Supervisor, Town of Colton John Tenbusch – St. Lawrence County Planning Board Mary Jane Watson – Grantwriter; Raquette River Historian Special Thanks To: Andrew Labruzzo – NYS Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources Prepared by: peter j. smith & company, inc. This document was prepared for the Planners, Landscape Architects New York State Department of State Buffalo, New York with funds provided under Title 11 of Fort Erie, Ontario the Environmental Protection Fund. Raquette River Corridor Blueway Trail Plan peter j. smith & company, inc. Raquette River Corridor Blueway Trail Plan peter j. smith & company, inc. Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ..............................................................................................