DOCSLIB.ORG

Pavement Preservation Program 2015-2016 Project Solicitation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pavement Preservation Program 2015-2016 Project Solicitation Adirondack / Glens Falls Transportation Council Pavement Preservation Program 2015‐2016 Project Solicitation Introduction The Adirondack / Glens Falls Transportation Council is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Planning and Programming Area that includes Warren County, Washington County, and the Town of Moreau and Village of South Glens Falls In Saratoga County. MPOs are responsible for administering a cooperative and continuing regional transportation planning process. A principal component of that process is capital programming for federally‐ funded transportation improvement projects. A/GFTC is seeking project candidates for its Pavement Preservation Program. This program consists of annual funding setasides dedicated for maintenance and preservation projects intended to prevent the deterioration of roadways that are presently in good to fair condition. The intent of the program is to encourage municipalities to actively engage in preventative maintenance strategies that reduce the need for more costly infrastructure replacement and major rehabilitation projects. Programming Levels A/GFTC has programmed $1,591,000 in matched federal Surface Transportation Program funds for pavement preservation projects that are to be obligated during Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2015‐2016. Additionally, $164,000 in matched funds has been programmed for FFY 2014‐2015 for any required design associated with the selected projects. A local match of 20% is required in order to access design and construction funds. The potential availability of Marchiselli funding, a State program that covers 75% of the required local match for federal aid transportation projects, could reduce the required local match to 5% of the overall project cost. Eligible Roadways All projects must be sponsored by a local municipality (Village, City, Town or County). Program eligibility is limited to the federal aid ‐ eligible roadway network. A listing of those roadways by municipality is attached as Appendix B. Please note that the State‐owned highways listed in Appendix B are not to be included in this solicitation; a separate setaside has been established to fund preservation projects on the State system. Questions regarding roadway eligibility should be directed to A/GFTC staff. Eligible Activities The range of eligible activities is limited to preventative maintenance and preservation projects that are primarily intended to address pavement surface conditions that are beginning to decline from good to fair condition but have not yet substantially deteriorated. In most cases, pavement that is already in poor condition is not likely to benefit from any of the treatments that are available under this program. Example of eligible activities include: crack seal / joint seal permanent pavement repairs chip seal diamond grinding only slurry seal PCC slab / joint repairs microsurfacing single course hot mix overlay w/repairs and paver‐paced surface treatment (NovaChip) T&L 6.3 mm overlay Mill and Fill single course hot mix asphalt overlay cold recycling with single course overlay hot in‐place recycling Pavement Preservation Program 2015‐ 2016 Page 1 Roadways that require corrective or major rehabilitation or reconstruction are not eligible for funding under this program. Examples of ineligible activities include: × multi‐course overlays × full concrete pavement restoration × white topping × concrete overlays × crack and seat × rubblizing These lists are illustrative and not necessarily exhaustive. Questions regarding project eligibility should be directed to A/GFTC staff. Project Cost and Management It is important to note that the Pavement Preservation Program is a reimbursement program. Project sponsors will be required to first secure construction authorization from NYSDOT Region 1 and then first‐instance project costs prior to receiving reimbursement for the Federal share. Reimbursement will not be available for costs incurred by the project sponsor prior to project authorization, such as those resulting from preliminary design. PLEASE NOTE: all construction projects must conform to applicable FHWA standards for materials, installation, and construction inspection. It is important to consider the administrative requirements attached to federal funding programs. Such requirements can be a burden to municipalities without dedicated staff or experience with the federal reimbursement process. Project sponsors should carefully weigh the benefits and costs of federal funding when deciding to pursue assistance through the Pavement Preservation Program. Project Evaluations A selection committee comprised of A/GFTC Technical Advisory Committee members and staff will review all applications based upon the following criteria: Is the roadway federal aid‐eligible? Is a preservation project proposed? Is the proposed candidate suitable for preservation, based upon its condition? Is the proposed cost consistent with the proposed treatment? In addition, the following characteristics will be considered during the project selection process: traffic volumes system redundancy multimodal utility geographic and demographic equity of project distribution project extent Project Application The required application form is attached as Appendix A. The form is also available under "Publications" on A/GFTC's website. Pavement Preservation Program 2015‐ 2016 Page 2 Project applications should be delivered to A/GFTC via e‐mail or letter by no later than Monday, April 13, 2015 using the contact information below: Adirondack / Glens Falls Transportation Council 11 South Street, Suite 203 Glens Falls, NY 12801 Phone: 518‐223‐0086 Fax: 518‐223‐0584 Email: [email protected] Pavement Preservation Program 2015‐ 2016 Page 3 Appendix A Program Application A/GFTC Pavement Preservation Program Project Application Form Project Information: Road Name / Route Number: Location: Segment: Segment Length: Project Sponsor: Project Applicant/Contact: Name: Title: Address: Phone: Fax: E‐mail: Funds Requested: Total Project Cost: Total Construction Cost: Total Design Cost: Federal Funds (80% max) Local Match (20% min) Please complete this application in its entirety. Attach extra sheets as necessary to provide maps, cost estimates, and additional materials. Please provide three copies of the application and related materials to A/GFTC via mail or email, at: Adirondack/Glens Falls Transportation Council 11 South Street, Suite 203 Glens Falls, NY 12801 P: (518) 223‐0086 F: (518) 223‐0584 [email protected] 1 Existing Pavement Condition: Describe the condition of the pavement proposed for repair. Attach additional maps and project photos as necessary. Proposed Treatment: Describe the type of repair that is proposed to correct the deficient conditions. 2 Project cost and match: Identify and list construction and, if necessary, design costs. List each as 80/20 shares (20% local match required). Describe the match to be provided by the project sponsor. If available, include or attach a cost estimate. Priority: If your municipality is submitting multiple project applications, please indicate the priority ranking of this project: Rank:_____________ of 3 Appendix B Listing of Federal Aid ‐Eligible Roads List of Federal Aid ‐ Eligible Roadways by Municipality ‐ Saratoga County Town of Moreau Butler Road Feeder Dam Road (9 to Tanglewood) Harrison Avenue Harrison Avenue Extension New York State Route 32 New York State Route 197 Nolan Road ( 9 to Tanglewood) Potter Road Reservoir Road Saratoga County Route 24 (Spier Falls Road ‐ 9 to Potter) Saratoga County Route 27 (Bluebird Road / Fenimore Bridge) Saratoga County Route 28 (Fort Edward Road) Saratoga County Route 31 (Fortsville Road) US Route 9 Van Buren Street Village of South Glens Falls Ferry Boulevard Fifth (5th) Street ‐ Main to Ferry Harrison Avenue (Main St to Moreau) Hudson Street Main Street New York State Route 32 US Route 9 Van Buren Street List of Federal Aid ‐ Eligible Roadways by Municipality ‐ Warren County Town of Bolton Town of Lake George Interstate 87 Interstate 87 New York State Route 9N New York State Route 9L New York State Route 9N Town of Chester US Route 9 Interstate 87 Warren County Route 6 (Beach Road) Natural Stone Bridge Road (between 87 and 9) Warren County Route 59 (Bloody Pond Road) New York State Route 8 Warren County Route 69 (West Brook Road) New York State Route 28N US Route 9 Village of Lake George Warren County Route 19 (Olmstedville Road) Warren County Route 51 (Beach Road) US Route 9 City of Glens Falls Bay Street Town of Lake Luzerne Broad Street New York State Route 9N Chester Street Warren County Route 16 (East River Drive ‐ south of CR 32) Cooper Street (north of Dix Avenue) Warren County Route 32 (Call Street) Crandall Street Dix Avenue Town of Queensbury Elm Street Aviation Road (87 to Mountain View Lane) Garfield Street Cronin Road Glen Street Dixon Road Grant Avenue Interstate 87 Haskell Avenue Luzerne Road Hudson Avenue Mountain View Lane Kensington Road New York State Route 32 (Lower Warren, Highland, Dix Ave) Knight Street New York State Route 254 (Aviation, River) Lawrence Street Potter Road Lexington Avenue Sanford Street Extension Lincoln Avenue Sherman Avenue Maple Street US Route 9 McDonald Street (from Maple to Warren) Warren County Route 7 (Bay Road ‐ south of 149) Mohican Street Warren County Route 17 (Round Pond, Blind Rock, Haviland) Murray Street Warren County Route 23 (Gurney Lane Road) Oakland Avenue Warren County Route 28 (Corinth Road, Main Street) Platt Street Warren
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bovina Township Delaware County New York Burial Data Compiled from the Papers of David F. Hoy & Howard F. Davidson The
    BOVINA TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY NEW YORK BURIAL DATA COMPILED FROM THE PAPERS OF DAVID F. HOY & HOWARD F. DAVIDSON & THE BOVINA CEMETERY ASSOCIATION Prepared By The Davidson Brothers: Edwin, Allan, Richard 01 February 2004 Up-dated September 13, 2015 M/S Word – Bovina Cemeteries Intro Page 1 09/27/15 This data has been transcribed with the utmost care - however no guarantee of accuracy is given. This information has been gleaned from various tombstone readings, Bovina New UP interment records (from 1910), 1855 and 1905 Bovina Census and the genealogy notes from the sources provided in “Early Bovina Families & their Descendants”. A few individuals appear to be buried in two locations. When David F. Hoy did his readings (1914-1918) I am certain that the tombstones were there. Some families moved their loved ones to the new cemetery before the Cemetery Association incorporated (1910) and no known record of the transfer exists, but the tombstones were read in the Bovina New UP Cemetery also. Please check this information against your other sources. We dedicate this database to the memory of our brother Allan Lloyd Davidson - 23 Oct 1925 – 10 Feb 2004 GPS Coordinates of Bovina Burial Sites M/S Word – Bovina Cemeteries Intro Page 2 09/27/15 * = Vacated [UPDATED Using Google Earth using Degrees-Minutes-Seconds] Elevation 1 - ARCHIBALD CEMETERY 42º 16’ 56.93” N 074º 42’ 09.66” W 2056 Feet 2 - BALLENTYNE CEMETERY 42º 16’ 34.06” N 074º 44’ 18.04” W 1975 Feet 3 - BLACK CEMETERY (Approx) 42º 15’ 11.13” N 074º 45’ 40.38” W 1949 Feet 4 - BRUSH CEMETERY
    [Show full text]
  • WSP Report 2012
    Watershed Stewardship Program Summary of Programs and Research 2012 Watershed Stewardship Program Report # AWI 2013-01 Executive Summary and Introduction 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary and Introduction........................................................................................................... 4 West-Central Adirondack Region Summary ............................................................................................... 17 Staff Profiles ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Chateaugay Lake Boat Launch Use Report ................................................................................................. 29 Cranberry Lake Boat Launch Use Study ...................................................................................................... 36 Fourth Lake Boat Launch Use Report ......................................................................................................... 45 Lake Flower and Second Pond Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................. 58 Lake Placid State and Village Boat Launch Use Study ................................................................................. 72 Long Lake Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................................................. 84 Meacham Lake Campground Boat Launch Use Study ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Local Law # 1 of 2020
    SCOZ Incorporation in the Town of Ancram Zoning Law of November 2014 LOCAL LAW NO. 1 OF THE'YEAR 2020 A Local Law amending Article V of the Town of Ancram Zoning Law to incorporate the supplementary regulations for the Town’s Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning District from Local Law No. 1 of 2003 and repealing Local Law No. 1 of 2003. Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Ancram, Columbia County, New York, as follows: SECTION I - TITLE OF LOCAL LAW This law shall be entitled “A Local Law proposing an amendment to Article V of the Town of Ancram Zoning Law to incorporate the supplementary regulations for the Town’s Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning District from Local Law No. 1 of 2003, and then repeal Local Law No. 1 of 2003.” SECTION II - LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE Subsequent to the adoption of the 2010 Town of Ancram Comprehensive Plan, the Town Board of the Town of Ancram updated and adopted a new Zoning Law on November 20, 2014. The 2014 Zoning Law included establishment and definition of a zoning district called the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, which was previously established by Town of Ancram Local Law 1 of 2003. The purpose of the amendment proposed in this resolution is to incorporate into the Town’s Zoning Law adopted on November 20, 2014 the provisions of Local Law No. 1 of 2003 which Local Law established supplementary regulations for a zoning district called the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. Those supplementary regulations were not incorporated into the Town’s Zoning Law when it was adopted in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit Hunter/Tannersville!
    Catskill Mountain Region AUGUST 2018 COMPLIMENTARY GUIDE catskillregionguide.com SPECIAL SECTION: VISIT HUNTER/TANNERSVILLE! August 2018 • GUIDE 1 TABLE OF www.catskillregionguide.com CONTENTS VOLUME 33, NUMBER 8 August 2018 PUBLISHERS Peter Finn, Chairman, Catskill Mountain Foundation Sarah Finn, President, Catskill Mountain Foundation EDITORIAL DIRECTOR, CATSKILL MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION Sarah Taft ADVERTISING SALES Rita Adami, Barbara Cobb Steve Friedman CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Anne Donovan, Stephanie Goff, Harry G. Jameson III, Heather Rolland, Jeff Senterman & Robert Tomlinson ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE Candy McKee Justin McGowan & Isabel Cunha PRINTING Catskill Mountain Printing Services DISTRIBUTION Catskill Mountain Foundation On the cover: Sam’s Point Trail in Ellenville, Ulster County. Photo courtesy of Ulster County Tourism EDITORIAL DEADLINE FOR NEXT ISSUE: August 10 The Catskill Mountain Region Guide is published 12 times a year by the Catskill Mountain Foundation, Inc., Main Street, PO Box 4 THE ARTS 924, Hunter, NY 12442. If you have events or programs that you would like to have covered, please send them by e-mail to tafts@ catskillmtn.org. Please be sure to furnish a contact name and in- 8 SECOND ANNUAL WOMEN’S EXPO AT ST. THERESA’S clude your address, telephone, fax, and e-mail information on all correspondence. For editorial and photo submission guidelines IN WINDHAM THIS AUGUST By Anne Donovan & Stephanie Goff send a request via e-mail to [email protected]. The liability of the publisher for any error for which it may be held legally responsible will not exceed the cost of space ordered FALLA! Two Masterpieces by the Great Spanish Composer or occupied by the error.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Economic Impact Study of the Gore Mountain Interconnect
    APPENDIX 1 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY OF THE GORE MOUNTAIN INTERCONNECT OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER Econotnic ltnpact Study of the Gore Mountain Interconnect Ala11 G. Hevesi : TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 Ski Industry History and Trends 4 Gore Mountain 5 Economic Impact Analysis 7 Development in the Adirondacks 9 Environmental Considerations 10 Appendix A - Skier Visits by Region 11 Appendix B - Skier Visits by Ski Resort 12 Appendix C - Weather and the Ski Industry 13 Appendix D - Land Use Definition and Intensity Guidelines 15 Appendix E - The UMP Process 16 Appendix F - Adirondack Park Agency Response 17 Appendix G - OSC Contacts 22 EcoNoMic l:MPACT STUDY OF THE GoRE MoUNTAIN "INTERCONNECT" Executive Summary The purpose ofthis study is to evaluate the economic impact ofthe construction and development of the ski lifts and trails that will, in effect, "interconnect" the Hamlet of North Creek, NY, with the main trail network of Gore Mountain Ski Center. Our study makes projections, based on ski industry statistical data, assessing the monetary impact of the development on the regional economy, which appears to be significant. It does not contain an analysis of the cost of constructing the interconnect. The Hamlet of North Creek and Gore Mountain have a rich skiing history. Many ofthe first ski trails were created from the old tote roads used to extract lumber and garnet ore on the area now referred to as the "Ski Bowl." This section ofthe mountain, opening in 1932, became one ofthe first ski areas in the country. In this era, skiers from Manhattan and beyond were delivered to North Creek by ski train.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 9.29: Town of Waterford
    SECTION 9.29: TOWN OF WATERFORD 9.29 TOWN OF WATERFORD This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of Waterford. A.) HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Paul McInerney/Dispatcher Supervisor Harry Martel/Highway Superintendent 65 Broad St., Waterford NY 12188 35 South St., Waterford NY 12188 (518) 237-3341 (518) 376-1678 [email protected] [email protected] B.) TOWN PROFILE Population 8,573 (estimated 2007 U.S. Census) Location The Town of Waterford, formed on April 17, 1816, is located in the southeastern corner of Saratoga County, north of the City of Troy. Its area is the smallest of any of the twenty towns in the county, being but seven square miles. It is bounded on the north by Halfmoon, on the east by the Hudson River and on the south and west by the Mohawk River. The Town of Waterford contains a village, also called Waterford. The east town line, defined by the Hudson River, is the border of Rensselaer County, and the south town line, defined by the Mohawk River, is the border of Albany County. The easternmost section and locks of the Erie Canal, which connects with the Hudson River pass through the town. The "Waterford flight" of locks is one of the highest in the world. The Erie Canal is linked to the Champlain Canal at Waterford. US Route 4, partly conjoined with New York State Route 32, is a north-south highway through eastern Waterford. According to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Draft Amendment to the Blue Ridge Wilderness
    BLUE RIDGE WILDERNESS Draft Amendment to the 2006 Blue Ridge Wilderness Unit Management Plan NYS DEC, REGION 5, DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS 701 South Main St., Northville, NY 12134 [email protected] www.dec.ny.gov November 2018 Introduction The Blue Ridge Wilderness Area (BRWA) is located in the towns of Indian Lake, Long Lake, Arietta, and Lake Pleasant and the Village of Speculator within Hamilton County. The unit is 48,242 acres in size. A Unit Management Plan (UMP) for this area was completed in 2006. This UMP Amendment contains one proposal: Construction of the Seventh Lake Mountain – Sargent Ponds Multiple-Use Trail. Management Proposal Construction of the Seventh Lake Mountain – Sargent Ponds Multiple-Use Trail Background: During the planning efforts that led to the drafting and adoption of the Moose River Plains Wild Forest (MRPWF) UMP, it was realized that there is a great need for new, land-based snowmobile trail connections in the area. As a result, the 2011 MRPWF UMP put forth a conceptual proposal for a snowmobile trail leading eastward and north of MRPWF that would connect to the Sargent Ponds Wild Forest (SPWF) trail system—pending the adoption of a SPWF UMP. Ultimately, the Seventh Lake Mountain – Sargent Ponds Multiple-Use Trail will provide a land-based connection between the communities of Indian Lake, Raquette Lake, Inlet, and Long Lake. The proposed trail system will greatly reduce rider’s risk associated with lake crossings and traveling along and crossing major roads. Management Action: This UMP amendment proposes construction of a portion of the Seventh Lake Mountain – Sargent Ponds Multiple-Use Trail and its maintenance as a Class II Community Connector Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Traffic Data Report for New York State
    2007 TRAFFIC DATA REPORT FOR NEW YORK STATE New York State Department of Transportation Table of Contents Page Chapter 1: Introduction.........................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Traffic Data Collecting Program Overview........................................................2 Chapter 3: Accuracy of Traffic Data Section 3.1 Data Collection Equipment Requirements.............................................3 Section 3.2 Data Quality Control Checks.................................................................4 Chapter 4: Continuous Count Program Section 4.1 Introduction............................................................................................7 Section 4.2 Maps of Continuous Count Sites by Region..........................................8 Section 4.3 Map of High Speed Weigh-In-Motion Sites, Statewide .......................19 Section 4.4 Traffic Monitoring Site Details and Specifications ..............................20 Chapter 5: Coverage Count Program Section 5.1 Volume, Speed and Classification Counts............................................21 Section 5.2 Highway Performance Monitoring System ..........................................24 Section 5.3 Annual Traffic Monitoring Workshop..................................................24 Section 5.4 Mobile Traffic Monitoring Platforms ...................................................25 Section 5.5 County Counter Initiative .....................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Charging Station Plan
    h Capital District Electric Vehicle Charging Station Plan PREPARED BY: IN COLLABORATION WITH: WITH SUPPORT FROM: March 2016 III Capital District Electric Vehicle Charging Station Plan NOTICE This report was prepared by Capital District Clean Communities and Energetics Incorporated in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no representation that the use of any product, apparatus, process, method, or other information will not infringe privately owned rights and will assume no liability for any loss, injury, or damage resulting from, or occurring in connection with, the use of information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. NYSERDA makes every effort to provide accurate information about copyright owners and related matters in the reports we publish. Contractors are responsible for determining and satisfying copyright or other use restrictions regarding the content of reports that they write, in compliance with NYSERDA’s policies and federal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Background and Planning Context
    Chapter 1: Background and Planning Context 1.1 INTRODUCTION Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (“Metro-North” or the “Project Sponsor”) is proposing the construction of a new, expanded parking garage at 50 Haarlem Avenue (formerly referred to as 525 North Broadway) in White Plains, Westchester County, New York. The Project Sponsor is seeking a Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) grant from the Federal Transit Administration for the design and construction of the proposed garage (the “Proposed Action”). The purpose of the Proposed Action is to accommodate the projected future demand for parking at the North White Plains railroad station, allowing Metro-North to better serve its existing customers and to accommodate future railroad customers. The provision of adequate parking at this location would encourage the use of mass transit at a station that has frequent service. 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION The Proposed Action is located on the site of the existing customer parking garage at 50 Haarlem Avenue between Glenn and Bond Streets in the City of White Plains. It would be sited to the east and across Haarlem Avenue from the existing North White Plains station (see Figure 1-1). 1.2.1 EXISTING STATION The North White Plains railroad station is located along Metro-North’s Harlem Line on Haarlem Avenue west of New York State Route 22 (Route 22) and east of the Bronx River Parkway, about ¼ mile north of Interstate 287 (I-287), in the northern section of the City of White Plains, Westchester County, New York (see Figure 1-2). The station is located near the municipal boundaries of the City of White Plains and the Towns of North Castle and Greenburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • May 25, 2013 Karen Thornton, American Viticultural Area
    May 25, 2013 Karen Thornton, American Viticultural Area Designations Regulations and Rulings Division Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 1310 G Street NW Washington DC, 20220 [email protected] Dear Ms. Thornton, Please find included here a revised petition for the declaration of a new American Viticultural Area, entitled the Champlain Valley AVA. This petition was created on behalf of the Lake Champlain Grape Growers Association. I previously included an endorsement from our local congressional representative, Bill Owens, whose interest is in the economic development of this region and through his participation as a member of the House Agricultural Committee. Finally, I include a set of USGS maps that define the trail. I believe I have addressed the items you have requested in this revise and resubmit. Most importantly, I provided extensive climatological data to show how this region is differentiated from the Adirondack and western foothills region to the west, the Hudson Valley to the south, and Vermont to the east. Each of these regions has a growing season averaging two weeks longer than we do, and hence can grow the Vitis vinifera grapes that cannot be grown in this proposed region. Hence, the characteristic of grapes in the proposed region is almost exclusively North American hybrid. It is this factor that most profoundly defines and differentiates our proposed region. Should you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Colin Read North Star Vineyard 1383 North Star Road, Mooers, NY, 12958 Telephone 518-561-3828 Email [email protected] Regulations and Rulings Division Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 1310 G Street NW Washington DC, 20220 A Petition to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau of the Department of the Treasury to Establish the: Champlain Valley AVA (American Viticultural Area) Submitted by: An Association of Wineries in the Champlain Valley of New York State (1)Name Evidence [i] Name Usage The name of the viticultural area described is the Champlain Valley of New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Lake • Raquette Lake • Blue Mountain • Newcomb • Tupper Lake • Indian Lake
    North Country Regional Economic Development Council Tourism Destination Area Nomination Workbook New York’s North Country Region North Country New York [TOURISM DESTINATION AREA NOMINATION WORKBOOK] Why is tourism important to the North Country? Tourism offers the most viable opportunity to diversity and ignite the North Country economy by capitalizing on existing demand to attract a wide variety of private investment that will transform communities. Tourism is already a $1 billion industry in the North Country and with its low upfront investment cost and quicker return on investment that many other industries, it is well- positioned to drive a new North Country economy as well as complement other strategic clusters of economic activity. Year-round tourism promotes a more sustainable, stable economy and more jobs; it’s the most likely growth industry for this region and will help recruit other types of investment. The region has a history of hospitality and several successful tourism hubs in place and exceptional four-season outdoor recreational opportunities are poised to leverage private investment in lodging, restaurant, attraction and other types of tourism related venues. Recognizing the transformative potential that tourism has in the North Country, the Regional Economic development Council is advancing the following strategies: Put tools in place to attract private investment in tourism which will drive demand to revitalize and diversity communities and create a climate that will allow entrepreneurs to flourish. Develop tourism infrastructure to transform the Region by driving community development and leveraging private investment in tourism destination area communities and corridors. The key to these strategies is that they recognize and focus attention on the need to attract and foster development in attractions, facilities and infrastructure conducive to attracting the 21st century traveling public.
    [Show full text]