DOCSLIB.ORG

FACT SHEET of Environmental Quality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FACT SHEET of Environmental Quality SEPTEMBER 2013 Arizona Department FACT SHEET of Environmental Quality Janice K. Brewer, Governor • Henry R. Darwin, Director Publication Number: FS 13-11 Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Upper Hassayampa Basin: A 2003-2009 Baseline Study – June 2013 Introduction A baseline groundwater quality study of the Upper Hassayampa basin was con- ducted from 2003 to 2009 by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Ambient Groundwater Monitor- ing Program. ADEQ carried out this task pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes §49-225 that mandates ongoing moni- toring of waters of the state including its aquifers. This fact sheet is a synopsis of the ADEQ Open File Report 13-03.1 The Upper Hassayampa groundwater basin covers approximately 787 square miles within Maricopa and Yavapai counties and is located about 60 miles Map 1 – Sample sites in the northwest of Phoenix (Map 1). The basin Upper Hassayampa basin is characterized by mid-elevation moun- are color-coded according to their water quality status: No tains and had an estimated population Water Quality Exceedences, 2 of 10,479 in 2000. The largest popula- Secondary MCLs Exceedences, Primary MCL Exceedances, and Primary and Secondary MCL Exceedances. (Map by Jean Ann Rodine) tion center is the Town of Wickenburg. tions range from approximately 7,000 Other communities include Congress feet above mean sea level (amsl) in the and Groom Creek. Low-intensity livestock Bradshaw Mountains to 1,900 feet amsl grazing is the predominant land use and along the Hassayampa River about five most ranches have limited acreages of ir- miles south of Wickenburg. The basin is rigated pasture to raise additional animal comprised of federal land managed by feed. There are no surface water diver- the U.S. Forest Service (25 percent) and sions or impoundments besides small Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (21 stock ponds within the basin.2 Ground- percent), State Trust lands (38 percent) water is the only source for public water and private land (16 percent).2 supply, domestic, irrigation and industrial purposes. Public water supply uses the Hydrology 2 most groundwater in the basin. The basin is drained by the Hassayampa The basin is bounded on the north by the River which flows from north to south. Weaver Mountains, on the northwest by The river is intermittent over much of its the Date Creek Mountains, on the south course but has perennial flow in its upper reaches in the Bradshaw Mountains and Figure 1 – The storage tank of the “ML Windmill” also by the Vulture Mountains, and on the serves as a sign post along the rugged Wagoner Road. east by the Bradshaw Mountains. Eleva- where bedrock brings groundwater to OUR MISSION To protect and enhance public health and the environment in Arizona. OUR VISION To lead Arizona and the nation in protecting the environment and improving the quality of life for the people of our FACT SHEET state. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality the surface a few miles south of Wicken- Methods of Investigation enforceable standards are based on a burg. Some of its tributaries, – including daily lifetime (70 years) consumption of To characterize regional groundwater 3 Antelope Creek, Ash Creek, Minnehaha PRINCIPLEStwo liters. AND VALUES Primary MCLs were exceeded quality, samples were collected from 34 Creek, and Weaver Creek – have limited We atadvocate nine for Arizona of the’s envi 34ronment. sites (27 percent). 2 sites (27 wells and seven springs). Of the We adhere to the highest standards of stretches of perennial flow. technicalConstituents professionalism. exceeding Primary MCLs 27 wells, 20 had submersible pumps, six We includecommit to the highestarsenic standards (one site), gross alpha Groundwater is found primarily in the of ethical behavior. were windmills, and one was a monitor- We (fiveare committed sites), to openness, and honesty nitrate (four sites). basin-fill sediments found in the south- ing well. and transparency. We foster relationships built on respect, east portion of the basin. The aquifer courtesyPublic and service. drinking water systems are Samples for inorganic constituents and We value creativity, innovation consists of gravel, sand, silt and clay and andencouraged performance. by the SDWA to meet is capable of yielding several hundred isotopes (oxygen and deuterium) were Weunenforceable, turn challenges into opportunities. aesthetics-based water collected from each site while radon We value our employees gallons per minute. Smaller alluvial de- andquality work as a team. guidelines, called Secondary posits are found along the Hassayampa (17 sites) and radionuclide (12 sites) MCLs, when supplying water to their River in the northern part of the basin. samples were collected at selected sites. customers. Water exceeding Second- Groundwater is also found in limited Sampling protocol followed the ADEQ ary MCLs may be unpleasant to drink amounts in the consolidated crystalline Quality Assurance Project Plan (see and/or create unwanted cosmetic or and sedimentary rocks that constitute www.azdeq.gov/function/programs/lab/). laundry effects but is not considered most of the basin.2 The effects of sampling equipment and a health concern.3 Secondary MCLs procedures were not significant based were exceeded at 13 of the 34 sites Groundwater movement mirrors surface on quality assurance/quality control (38 percent). Constituents exceeding flow, going from north to south. Depth evaluations. Secondary MCLs include chloride (one to groundwater varies across the basin, Water Quality Sampling Results site), fluoride (four sites), iron (two sites), ranging from just a few feet below land manganese (four sites), sulfate (one surface along some stretches of the Has- Groundwater sample results were site), and TDS (eight sites). sayampa River to more than 1,000 feet compared with the Safe Drinking Water below land surface in the center of the Radon is a naturally occurring, inter- Act (SDWA) health and aesthetics-based basin. Natural recharge for the basin is mediate breakdown product from the water quality standards. estimated to be 8,000 acre-feet per year radioactive decay of uranium-238 to Public drinking water systems must while groundwater use is estimated to lead-206. Of the 17 sites sampled for 2 meet health-based, water quality be 3,900 acre-feet per year. radon, none exceeded the proposed standards, called Primary Maximum 4,000 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) stan- Contaminant Levels (MCLs), when sup- dard that would apply if Arizona estab- plying water to their customers. These lishes a multimedia program to address the health risks from radon in indoor air.3 Eight sites (47 percent) exceeded the proposed 300 pCi/L standard that would apply if Arizona does not develop a multimedia program.3 Groundwater Composition Groundwater composition varied throughout the basin in the following ways: • Groundwater chemistry in the basin is most commonly calcium-bicarbonate or mixed-bicarbonate. • Levels of pH measured in the field were slightly alkaline (above seven standard units) except for five sample sites that were slightly acidic (below seven standard units). • Total dissolved solids (TDS) concentra- tions were considered fresh (below Figure 2 – Intermittent flow in the Hassayampa River Figure 3 – An unused aqueduct, the Leppe Wash 999 mg/L) at 32 sites and slightly sa- at the Wagoner Road Bridge. The stream is perennial flume, is located on the historic TK Bar Ranch along at higher and lower elevations in the basin. the Hassayampa River near Kirkland, Arizona. line (1,000 – 3,000 mg/L) at two sites. OUR MISSION To protect and enhance public health and the environment in Arizona. OUR VISION To lead Arizona and the nation in protecting the environment and improving the quality of life for the people of our FACT SHEET state. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality • Hardness concentrations were moder- probably result from human activities commonly impacted the acceptability ately hard (75 - 150 mg/L) at two sites, (four sites > 10 mg/L).4 of water for drinking purposes were hard (151 - 300 mg/L) at 22 sites, very gross alpha and nitrate. • Most trace elements such as alumi- PRINCIPLES AND VALUES hard (301 – 600 mg/L) at eight sites, We advocate for Arizona’s environment. num, antimony, arsenic, beryllium, Gross alpha exceeded health-based, and extremely hard (above 600 mg/L) We adhere to the highest standards of boron, cadmium, chromium, iron, technicalwater professionalism. quality standards in radionuclide at two sites. We commit to the highest standards lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, of ethsamplesical behavior. collected from five sites. Radio- We are committed to openness, honesty • Nitrate (as nitrogen) concentrations at selenium, silver, and thallium were andnuclide transparency. samples were collected how- most sites may have been influenced rarely detected. Only barium, fluo- We foster relationships built on respect, courtesyever, and atservice. only 12 of the 34 sites, so gross by human activities and were divided ride, and zinc were detected at more We value creativity, innovation andalpha performance. had a 42 percent water quality into natural background (eight sites than one-third of the sites. Westandard turn challenges into exceedance opportunities. rate. This finding is at <0.2 mg/L) may or may not indicate We value our employees andnot work asunexpected a team. as large portions of the human influence (20 sites at 0.2 – 3.0 Oxygen and deuterium isotope values at most sites appear to be a product of basin consist of granitic geology and a mg/L) ), may result from human activi- few sites were in the vicinity of historic ties (two sites at 3.0 – 10 mg/L), and the elevation at which the sample sites were located. The five samples that mining activity, both of which are as- sociated with elevated radionuclide Recharge Group experienced little evaporation were 6 characterized as depleted and were concentrations in groundwater. Based collected from sites located high in the on these results, future basin studies Bradshaw Mountains.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology, Geology, and Listric Normal Faulting of the Vulture Mountains, Maricopa County, Arizona
    Arizona Geological Society Digest, Volume XII, 1980 89 Geochronology, Geology, and Listric Normal Faulting of the Vulture Mountains, Maricopa County, Arizona by WA. Rehrigi, M. Shafiqullah2, and P.E. Damon2 Abstract Geologic mapping and geochronologic studies in the Vulture Mountains near Wickenburg, Arizona, have led to the recognition of a large, northeast-trending batholith of 68.4-m.y. age that intrudes complex gneissic and granitic rocks of probably Precambrian age. Over- lying the denuded crystalline terrane is a sequence of late Oligocene to Miocene ( .'26 to 16 m.y.) volcanic rocks (vitrophyres, ash-flow tuffs, welded tuffs, breccias, agglomerates, and lava flows) that vary locally. Nearby source areas are suggested. A swarm of north- to north-northwest-trending porphyritic dikes intrudes the volcanics and crystalline basement. Overlying this volcanic sequence in angular unconformity is a thin section of basal conglom- erate and basalt lava flows dated at 13.5 m.y. B.P. The older, tuffaceous sequence is generally calc-alkalic but with a high proportion of rhyolites that are exceptionally rich in potassium and silica. These silicic units are peral- kaline or nearly so, and those with K20/Na2O >3 are ultrapotassic. Initial strontium ratios average 0.7081, whereas an initial ratio for the younger basalt sequence is significantly lower at 0.7054. The silicic volcanics have been severely tilted on multiple, low-angle listric normal faults. The youngest basalt flows are relatively flat lying and postdate this deformation. By geo- logic and radiometric criteria, the transition from tilted silicic volcanics to untilted basalts occurred between about 16 and 14 m.y.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Missing Linkages (US-93: Wickenburg to Santa Maria River Linkage Design)
    ARIZONA MISSING LINKAGES US-93: Wickenburg to Santa Maria River Linkage Design Paul Beier, Daniel Majka submitted July 2006 last revised March 14, 2007 US-93: WICKENBURG TO SANTA MARIA RIVER LINKAGE DESIGN Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. We thank Dr. Phil Rosen, Matt Good, Chasa O’Brien, Dr. Jason Marshal, Ted McKinney, and Taylor Edwards for parameterizing models for focal species and suggesting focal species. Catherine Wightman, Fenner Yarborough, Janet Lynn, Mylea Bayless, Andi Rogers, Mikele Painter, Valerie Horncastle, Matthew Johnson, Jeff Gagnon, Erica Nowak, Lee Luedeker, Allen Haden, and Shaula Hedwall helped identify focal species and species experts. Robert Shantz provided photos for many of the species accounts. Shawn Newell, Jeff Jenness, Megan Friggens, and Matt Clark provided helpful advice on analyses and reviewed portions of the results. Funding This project was funded by a grant from Arizona Game and Fish Department to Northern Arizona University. Recommended Citation Beier, P., and D. Majka. 2006. Arizona Missing Linkages: US-93: Wickenburg to Santa Maria River Linkage Design. Report to Arizona Game and Fish Department. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ I LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES...............................................................................................................................II
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue, Vol. 53 No. 2
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 53 Number 2 Article 15 6-4-1993 Full Issue, Vol. 53 No. 2 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation (1993) "Full Issue, Vol. 53 No. 2," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 53 : No. 2 , Article 15. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol53/iss2/15 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. T H E GREATR EAT BASINbaab7a S I1 N MTURALISTNA afufta FISTlyom llemoe ak VOLUME 53 n2na 2 JUNE 1993 BRIGHAM YOUNG university GREAT BASIN naturalist editor JAMES 11 BARNES 290 MLBM brigham young university provo utah 84602 associate editors MICHAEL A BOWERS BRIAN A MAURER blandy experimental farm university of department ofzoology brigham YoungyounguniversityyoungiuniversityUniversity virginia box 175 boyce virginia 22620 provo utah 84602 J R CALLAHAN JIMMIE R PARRISH museum of southwestern biology university of BIOWESTBIO WEST inc 1063 west 1400 north logan new mexico albuquerque new mexico utah 84321 mailing address box 3140 hemet california 92546 PAUL T TUELLER department of range wildlife and forestry JEANNE C CHAMBERS university of nevada reno 1000 valley road USDA forest service research university of ne reno nevada 89512 vada reno 920 valley road reno nevada 89512 ROBERT
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium in the Basin and Range Province of Arizona
    Cenozoic Sediments, Volcanics, and Related Uranium in the Basin and Range Province of Arizona Jan C. Wilt J. C.Wilt & Co. TLcson, Arizona Robert B. Scarborough University of Arizona TLcson, Arizona Concentrations of uranium in Cenozoic deposits of Arizona occur with carbonaceous and siliceous matter in light-colored, calcareous mudstones or fetid carbonates that were deposited in lacustrine, paludal or low= energy floodplain environments. Although uranium was deposited throughout the Cenozoic, the largest uranium resources in the state occur in the Date Creek basin in fine-grained sediments associated with ig- nimbrite volcanism of the mid-Tertiary orogeny. This concentration may be related to the coincidence of three factors: low-energy environments where fine grained, carbonaceous, lacustrine or paludal sediments were accumulating; exposure of large areas of alkalic Precambrian granite; and, extrusion of large volumes of relatively alkalic and silicic volcanics of the mid.Tertiary ignimbrites. In 1975, Union Oil Co. announced that the Anderson 1979). That investigation consisted of a survey of the mine in southern Yavapai County, Arizona, contained literature describing various Xrtiary formations, ex- 80 million pounds of uranium buried beneath rocks of amination of outcrops of uraniferous Tertiary sedi- the Date Creek basin (Sherborne and others, 1979; Eng. ments, and determination of ages of intercalated vol- Min. Jour., 1978). This discovery, coupled with the in- canics. creased price of uranium, touched off a flurry of explora- Earlier papers by Cooley and Davidson (1963), Heindl tion activity throughout the Basin and Range province (1962), and Sell (1968) correlated Cenozoic rock units of Arizona (Peirce, 1977). Much of the leasing and claim according to rock type, structural involvement, and se- staking was directed at the Date Creek basin and sur- quence.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Department of Water Resources Depth to Water and Water - Level Altitude, Sheet 1 of 3
    A.D.W.R HYDROLOGIC MAP SERIES REPORT NO. 35 PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES DEPTH TO WATER AND WATER - LEVEL ALTITUDE, SHEET 1 OF 3 R. 4 E. T. 9 N. CAREFREE EXPLANATION FOUNTAIN HILLS LAKE PLEASANT R. 5 E. UPPER NUMBER, 95, IS DEPTH TO 95 WELL IN WHICH DEPTH TO WATER WAS MEASURED IN 1997-1998 AND 2002-2003. HASSAYAMPA WATER IN FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE. LOWER NUMBER,1084, IS THE ALTITUDE OF THE WATER LEVEL IN FEET R. 3 E. 112 00 1084 ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL. DATUM IS REFERENCED TO THE NATIONAL VERTICAL GEODETIC DATUM OF 1929. R. 3 W. WEST SALT RIVER VALLEY T. BASIN-FILL DEPOSITS, (SILT, SAND, CLAY, GRAVEL, CONGLOMERATE, SANDSTONE, MUDSTONE, EVAPORITES, AND 112 30 VOLCANICS). 8 EAST SALT RIVER VALLEY N. 34 00 34 00 R. 2 E. HARDROCK (GRANITIC, METAMORPHIC, VOLCANIC OR CONSOLIDATED SEDIMENTARY ROCK - WATER MAY OCCUR IN RAINBOW VALLEY R. 2 W. WEATHERED OR FRACTURED ZONES, JOINT SYSTEMS, OR FLUVIAL DEPOSITS OVERLYING BEDROCK). R. 4 W. T. 7 INDIAN RESERVATIONS Sub-Basins in the Phoenix AMA N. NEW RIVER MOUNTAINS R. 5 W. R. 6 W. MAJOR HIGHWAY 112 45 R. 6 E. R. 1 W. R. 7 W. R. 1 E. MAJOR WATERWAY R. 8 W. 111 45 T. HIEROGLYPHIC MOUNTAINS 1650 GENERAL DIRECTION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW IN THE PRIMARY PART OF THE MAIN AQUIFER 113 00 VULTURE MOUNTAINS 6 N. 2150 112 15 BOUNDARY BETWEEN HARDROCK AND BASIN FILL 1600 2200 1500 1550 Cave Creek 1300 1450 WATER LEVEL CONTOURS - SHOWS THE APPROXIMATE ALTITUDE OF THE WATER-LEVEL.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E.12 Geology, Soils, and Prime and Unique Farmlands
    FHWA-AZ-EIS-19-01-D Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix E12, Geology, Soils, and Prime and Unique Farmlands Technical Memorandum March 2019 Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S ADOT Project No. 999 SW 0 M5180 01P This page intentionally left blank I-11 Corridor Draft Tier 1 EIS Appendix E12. Geology, Soils, and Prime and Unique Farmlands Technical Memorandum 1 Table of Contents 2 E12 Affected Environment ..................................................................................................... E12-1 3 E12.1 Geology ........................................................................................................E12 -1 4 E12.1.1 Study Area Overview and Methodology ...................................... E12-1 5 Local Geology ............................................................................. E12-1 6 Land Subsidence and Earth Fissures .......................................... E12-2 7 Active Faults and Seismicity........................................................ E12-2 8 E12.1.2 South Section Geology ............................................................... E12-3 9 Local Geology (South Section) .................................................... E12-3 10 Land Subsidence and Earth Fissures (South Section) ................ E12-4 11 Active Faults and Seismicity (South Section) .............................. E12-4 12 E12.1.3 Central Section Geology ............................................................. E12-8 13 Local Geology (Central Section) ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of the Phrynosoma Douglasii Species Complex (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae)
    Zootaxa 4015 (1): 001–177 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4015.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6C577904-2BCC-4F84-80FB-E0F0EEDF654B ZOOTAXA 4015 A taxonomic revision of the Phrynosoma douglasii species complex (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae) RICHARD R. MONTANUCCI1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0314. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by A. Bauer: 16 Jun. 2015; published: 11 Sept. 2015 RICHARD R. MONTANUCCI A taxonomic revision of the Phrynosoma douglasii species complex (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae) ( Zootaxa 4015) 177 pp.; 30 cm. 11 Sept. 2015 ISBN 978-1-77557-789-8 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-790-4 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2015 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2015 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 4015 (1) © 2015 Magnolia Press MONTANUCCI Table of contents Abstract . 3 Introduction . 3 Materials and methods . 5 Results and discussion .
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T
    Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(s): T. H. Kearney Source: Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1964), pp. 94-103 Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022366 Accessed: 21/05/2010 20:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=anas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. http://www.jstor.org ARIZONA LOCALITIESOF INTEREST TO BOTANISTS Compiled by T.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals of Arizona Report
    MINERALS OF ARIZONA by Frederic W. Galbraith and Daniel J. Brennan THE ARIZONA BUREAU OF MINES Price One Dollar Free to Residents of Arizona Bulletin 181 1970 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA TUCSON TABLE OF CONT'ENTS EIements .___ 1 FOREWORD Sulfides ._______________________ 9 As a service about mineral matters in Arizona, the Arizona Bureau Sulfosalts ._. .___ __ 22 of Mines, University of Arizona, is pleased to reprint the long-standing booklet on MINERALS OF ARIZONA. This basic journal was issued originally in 1941, under the authorship of Dr. Frederic W. Galbraith, as Simple Oxides .. 26 a bulletin of the Arizona Bureau of Mines. It has moved through several editions and, in some later printings, it was authored jointly by Dr. Gal­ Oxides Containing Uranium, Thorium, Zirconium .. .... 34 braith and Dr. Daniel J. Brennan. It now is being released in its Fourth Edition as Bulletin 181, Arizona Bureau of Mines. Hydroxides .. .. 35 The comprehensive coverage of mineral information contained in the bulletin should serve to give notable and continuing benefits to laymen as well as to professional scientists of Arizona. Multiple Oxides 37 J. D. Forrester, Director Arizona Bureau of Mines Multiple Oxides Containing Columbium, February 2, 1970 Tantaum, Titanium .. .. .. 40 Halides .. .. __ ____ _________ __ __ 41 Carbonates, Nitrates, Borates .. .... .. 45 Sulfates, Chromates, Tellurites .. .. .. __ .._.. __ 57 Phosphates, Arsenates, Vanadates, Antimonates .._ 68 First Edition (Bulletin 149) July 1, 1941 Vanadium Oxysalts ...... .......... 76 Second Edition, Revised (Bulletin 153) April, 1947 Third Edition, Revised 1959; Second Printing 1966 Fourth Edition (Bulletin 181) February, 1970 Tungstates, Molybdates.. _. .. .. .. 79 Silicates ...
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation Geologic Map of the Daisy Mountain 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona
    Compilation Geologic Map of the Daisy Mountain 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona by Robert S. Leighty Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-22 August, 1998 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85701 Includes 30 page text and 1 :24,000 scale geologic map. This report was supported by the Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency, with funds provided by the u.s. Environmental Protection Agency through the State Indoor Radon Grant Program, the U.S. Geological Survey via the STATEMAP program, and the Arizona Geological Survey. This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards INTRODUCTION The Daisy Mountain Quadrangle, located along the northernmost fringe of the Phoenix metropolitan area, straddles the physiographic boundary between the Basin and Range and Transition Zone (Figure 1). The quadrangle lies between 1-17 and Cave Creek and is bordered on the south by the northwestern end of Paradise Valley and rugged, high-relief terrain of the New River Mountains to the north. The Daisy Mountain Quadrangle includes the community of New River, which is undergoing rapid population growth and is becoming increasingly urbanized. Thus, the knowledge of the distribution and character of bedrock and surficial deposits is important to make informed decisions concerning management of the land and its resources. This project was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency through the State Indoor Radon Grant Program, and the Arizona Geological Survey. PREVIOUS STUDIES Over the last two decades various workers have conducted geologic mapping investigations in the Daisy Mountain Quadrangle.
    [Show full text]