Winter 1999 Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Winter 1999 Vol A PERIODICAL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS WINTER 1999 VOL. 29, NUMBER 3 FEATURES Editors 2 GOLDEN STARDUST RENE DONALDSON, BILL KIRK The ISOLDE facility at CERN is being used to study how lighter elements are forged Contributing Editors into heavier ones in the furnaces of the stars. MICHAEL RIORDAN, GORDON FRASER JUDY JACKSON, AKIHIRO MAKI James Gillies PEDRO WALOSCHEK 8 NEUTRINOS HAVE MASS! Editorial Advisory Board The Super-Kamiokande detector has found a PATRICIA BURCHAT, DAVID BURKE LANCE DIXON, GEORGE SMOOT deficit of one flavor of neutrino coming GEORGE TRILLIN G, KARL VAN BIBBER through the Earth, with the likely HERMAN WINICK implication that neutrinos possess mass. Illustrations John G. Learned TERRY AN DERSON 16 IS SUPERSYMMETRY THE NEXT Distribution LAYER OF STRUCTURE? C RYSTAL TILGHMAN Despite its impressive successes, theoretical physicists believe that the Standard Model is The Beam Line is published quarterly by the incomplete. Supersymmetry might provide Stanford Linear Accelerator Center the answer to the puzzles of the Higgs boson. Box 4349, Stanford, CA 94309. Telephone: (650) 926-2585 Michael Dine EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: (650) 926-4500 Issues of the Beam Line are accessible electronically on the World Wide Web at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/beamline. SLAC is operated by Stanford University under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. The opinions of the authors do not necessarily reflect the policies of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Cover: The Super-Kamiokande detector during filling in 1996. Physicists in a rubber raft are polishing the 20-inch photomultipliers as the water rises slowly. See John Learned’s article on page 8. (Courtesy ICRR, University of Tokyo) Printed on recycled paper CONTENTS 22 CERN’s Low Energy Antiproton Ring L•E•A•R CERN’s Low Energy Antiproton Ring is remembered for its transformations, experimental results, and remarkable machine physics performance. ~ Gordon Fraser DEPARTMENTS d d 28 THE UNIVERSE AT LARGE Astrophysics Faces the Millennium Virginia Trimble 37 FROM THE EDITORS’ DESK 38 CONTRIBUTORS 40 DATES TO REMEMBER m m ~ t g t co g 1 by JAMES GILLIES HERE DO GOLD earrings come from? A simple answer is the local jewelry “It is the stars, The stars shop, but if you really want to know in above us, govern our Wdepth, you’ll have to dig a lot further. Gold is, quite literally, stardust. About half of it is forged in stars that burn normal- conditions”; ly, while the rest comes from large stars at the ends of their lives—in the cataclysmic explosions called supernovae. That (King Lear, Act IV, Scene 3) much we know. But exactly how gold and all other elements but perhaps heavier than iron are formed is still unclear. A new series of experiments at the ISOLDE facility at the European Labora- “The fault, dear Brutus, tory for Particle Physics, CERN, in Geneva aims to find out. The history of the elements is as old as the Universe itself. is not in our stars, But In the beginning, at the Big Bang, only the very lightest in ourselves.” elements—hydrogen, helium, and a little lithium—were formed. Since then, so little heavier material has been (Julius Caesar, Act I, Scene 2) created that even today hydrogen and helium make up over 99 percent of all the matter in the Universe. Everything else [Reprinted from “Synthesis of the Elements in Stars” by E. M. Bur- amounts to just a tiny fraction of 1 percent. bidge, G. R. Burbidge, W. A. Fowler, After the Big Bang, a billion years passed before any heav- and F. Hoyle, Reviews of Modern ier elements appeared. They had to wait until the formation Physics 29, 547 (1957)] of stars, when gravity squeezed the light elements so tightly that they fused, igniting the stellar furnaces that forge heav- ier elements from lighter ones. In the normally burning part of their lives, these stars build elements as heavy as iron, producing energy from fusion as they do so. But then the process stops, because anything heavier than iron takes more energy to make than fusion gives out. That doesn’t mean such elements can’t be made in stars—the fusion process just uses some of the energy released by light-element fusion— 2 WINTER 1999 but the Universe simply hasn’t been around long enough for all the heavy elements we observe to have been produced that way. Another process must be at work. In 1957 the husband and wife team of Margaret and Geoffrey Burbidge working with Willy Fowler and the maverick British astronomer Fred Hoyle figured out what it could be. They pub- lished a paper which has since become legendary in the field of theoretical astro- physics and is known to aficionados sim- ply as B2FH. In it, the Burbidges, Fowler, and Hoyle show how neutrons could pro- vide the route to the heavier elements. B2FH describes the so-called s- and r- processes through which slow neutron absorption in stars could generate about half the present abundance of heavier- than-iron elements, with rapid neutron absorption, thought to occur in super- Left to right, Margaret and Geoffrey Burbidge, William Fowler, and Fred Hoyle, authors of the famous 1957 paper, “Synthesis of Ele- novae, making up the balance. ments in Stars.” (Courtesy Astronomical Society of the Pacific) The reason why neutrons can take over where fusion leaves off is that they are uncharged. There is no electrical repulsion resisting their entry into nuclei, and they can slip in more-or-less unnoticed. But only up to a point. When a nucleus becomes too neutron-rich it also becomes unstable and decays—nuclei tend to rearrange themselves into more energy-efficient configurations. Beta-decay turns a neutron into a proton, throwing out an electron in the process. The result is a nucleus with the same total number of constituent particles, but with one more proton and one fewer neutron. In normally burning stars neutrons are released when helium nuclei fuse with other elements. There are relatively few of them around, and the proba- bility that a nucleus will encounter one is consequently small. That’s why B2FH named the neutron-capture process in stars the slow, or s-process: heavier-than-iron elements are built up slowly. What happens is that the BEAMLINE3 neutron-capture chain marches The s-process is responsible for steadily through the stable neutron- a lot of heavy elements, but it can’t rich versions of an element until it account for them all. There are many reaches an unstable one. That nu- stable heavy elements which are cleus then decays before it has a highly neutron rich. To reach them chance to absorb another neutron involves passing through unstable and the march towards heavier ele- isotopes on the way. That means that ments resumes in the element with neutrons have to be so abundant that one more proton. an unstable nucleus can absorb sev- eral before it gets a chance to decay, and that is where the rapid r-process comes in. R-process element gener- Right, electrons orbit nuclei at well- + Ei A + e ation happens in places where the defined energies which are unique to Selective 41.11 eV each element. The laser ion source Ionization neutron density is staggering—the (below) works by firing three laser sort of places, in fact, which are only pulses at a cloud of atoms in quick suc- w3 found in certain stars when they cession. The pulses are tuned so that reach the ends of their lives in the the first lifts an electron from one orbit to most violent explosions known in another, the second lifts it again, and the w2 the Universe—supernovae. third knocks it out completely. The com- bination of pulses is unique to the ele- Most stars finish their careers in ment required. Below, Michine Viatch- unspectacular fashion, retiring peace- eslav and Ulli Köster adjust the light Present: Ag, Mn, Be, Cu w1 fully from energy production before bench for CERN’s laser ion source. slowly fading away into darkness. Our own Sun is one of these. It has enough fuel to burn its way up to car- bon, and in a few billion years from now it will end its days as a slowly cooling lump of ash. Heavier stars don’t all go so quietly, and some of them, the James Deans of the cos- mos, instead go out in spectacular style. A supernovae happens when a heavy star has completely burned up its insides. With its fuel source ex- hausted, there is nothing left to sup- port it and the star collapses in on it- self. Protons in the star resist the collapse because of the repulsive elec- tric force between them, but the grav- itational pull of all the matter in the dead star is stronger and the charge is literally squeezed out of the pro- tons in the form of positive electrons (positrons), turning them into neu- trons. The star’s collapse generates a shock-wave traveling outwards 4 WINTER 1999 which blows the outer layers of the in a lock by selecting just the ele- star out into space in an explosion ment of interest. At ISOLDE a beam accompanied by copious neutrons. of protons strikes a target. The im- What Makes an In this extremely neutron-rich envi- pact causes a range of unstable atoms Element an Element? ronment, an unstable nucleus has a to be created. These are evaporated good chance of catching another from the target and allowed to find N ATOM IS MADE UP neutron before it decays.
Recommended publications
  • CERN Courier–Digital Edition
    CERNMarch/April 2021 cerncourier.com COURIERReporting on international high-energy physics WELCOME CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the March/April 2021 issue of CERN Courier. Hadron colliders have contributed to a golden era of discovery in high-energy physics, hosting experiments that have enabled physicists to unearth the cornerstones of the Standard Model. This success story began 50 years ago with CERN’s Intersecting Storage Rings (featured on the cover of this issue) and culminated in the Large Hadron Collider (p38) – which has spawned thousands of papers in its first 10 years of operations alone (p47). It also bodes well for a potential future circular collider at CERN operating at a centre-of-mass energy of at least 100 TeV, a feasibility study for which is now in full swing. Even hadron colliders have their limits, however. To explore possible new physics at the highest energy scales, physicists are mounting a series of experiments to search for very weakly interacting “slim” particles that arise from extensions in the Standard Model (p25). Also celebrating a golden anniversary this year is the Institute for Nuclear Research in Moscow (p33), while, elsewhere in this issue: quantum sensors HADRON COLLIDERS target gravitational waves (p10); X-rays go behind the scenes of supernova 50 years of discovery 1987A (p12); a high-performance computing collaboration forms to handle the big-physics data onslaught (p22); Steven Weinberg talks about his latest work (p51); and much more. To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://comms.iop.org/k/iop/cerncourier To subscribe to the magazine, please visit: https://cerncourier.com/p/about-cern-courier EDITOR: MATTHEW CHALMERS, CERN DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY IOP PUBLISHING ATLAS spots rare Higgs decay Weinberg on effective field theory Hunting for WISPs CCMarApr21_Cover_v1.indd 1 12/02/2021 09:24 CERNCOURIER www.
    [Show full text]
  • Very High Energy Emission from Blazars Interpreted Through Simultaneous Multiwavelength Observations
    UNIVERSITA` DEGLI STUDI DI SIENA FACOLTA` DI SCIENZE MATEMATICHE, FISICHE E NATURALI Dipartimento di Fisica Very High Energy emission from blazars interpreted through simultaneous multiwavelength observations Relatore/Supervisor: Candidato/Candidate: Dr. Antonio Stamerra Giacomo Bonnoli Tutore/Tutor: Prof. Riccardo Paoletti Ph.D. School in Physics Cycle XXI December 2010 Abstract In the framework of Astroparticle Physics the understanding of the particle acceleration process and related high energy electromagnetic emission within astrophysical sources is an issue of fundamental importance to unravel the structure and evolution of many classes of celestial objects, on different scales from micro{quasars to active galactic nuclei. This has an important role not only for astrophysics itself, but for many related topics of cosmic ray physics and High Energy physics, such as the search for dark matter. Also cosmology is interested, as deepening our knowledge on Active Galactic Nuclei and their interaction with the environment can help to clarify open issues on the formation of cosmic structures and evolution of universe on large scales. The present view on sources emitting high energy radiation is now gaining new insight thanks to multiwavelength observations. This approach allows to explore the spectral energy distribution of the sources all across the electromagnetic spectrum, therefore granting the best achievable understanding of the physical processes that originate the radiation that we see, and their mutual relationships. Our theories model the sources in terms of parameters that can be inferred from the observables quantities measured, and the multiwavelength observations are a key instrument in order to rule out or support some selected models out of the many that compete in the effort of describing the processes at work.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics and Evolution of Supermassive Black Holes in Merging Galaxies
    Dynamics and Evolution of Supermassive Black Holes in Merging Galaxies Fazeel Mahmood Khan Astronomisches Rechen-Institut Zentrum f¨urAstronomie der Universit¨atHeidelberg Heidelberg 2011 Cover picture: Gemini image of NGC 5426-27 (Arp 271). Dissertation submitted to the Combined Faculties for the Natural Sciences and for Mathematics of the Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg, Germany for the degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences Put forward by Fazeel Mahmood Khan Born in: Azad Kashmir, Pakistan Oral examination: January 25, 2012 Dynamics and Evolution of Supermassive Black Holes in Merging Galaxies Referees: PD Dr. Andreas Just Prof. Dr. Volker Springel Abstract Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) are ubiquitous in galaxy centers and are correlated with their hosts in fundamental ways, suggesting an intimate link between SMBH and galaxy evolution. In the paradigm of hierarchical galaxy formation this correlation demands prompt coalescence of SMBH binaries, presumably due to dynamical friction, interaction of stars and gas with the binary and finally due to gravitational wave emission. If they are able to coalesce in less than a Hubble time, SMBH binaries will be a promising source of gravitational waves for gravitational wave detectors. However, it has been suggested that SMBH binaries may stall at a separation of 1 parsec. This stalling is sometimes referred to as the \Final Parsec Problem (FPP)". This study uses N-body simulations to test an improved formula for the orbital decay of SMBHs due to dynamical friction. Using a large set of N-body simulations, we show that the FPP does not occur in galaxies formed via mergers. The non spherical shape of the merger remnants ensures a constant supply of stars for the binary to interact with.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 APS Prize and Award Recipients
    APS Announces 2018 Prize and Award Recipients The APS would like to congratulate the recipients of these APS prizes and awards. They will be presented during APS award ceremonies throughout the year. Both March and April meeting award ceremonies are open to all APS members and their guests. At the March Meeting, the APS Prizes and Awards Ceremony will be held Monday, March 5, 5:45 - 6:45 p.m. at the Los Angeles Convention Center (LACC) in Los Angeles, CA. At the April Meeting, the APS Prizes and Awards Ceremony will be held Sunday, April 15, 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. at the Greater Columbus Convention Center in Columbus, OH. In addition to the award ceremonies, most prize and award recipients will give invited talks during the meeting. Some recipients of prizes, awards are recognized at APS unit meetings. For the schedule of APS meetings, please visit http://www.aps.org/meetings/calendar.cfm. Nominations are open for most 2019 prizes and awards. We encourage members to nominate their highly-qualified peers, and to consider broadening the diversity and depth of the nomination pool from which honorees are selected. For nomination submission instructions, please visit the APS web site (http://www.aps.org/programs/honors/index.cfm). Prizes 2018 APS MEDAL FOR EXCELLENCE IN PHYSICS 2018 PRIZE FOR A FACULTY MEMBER FOR RESEARCH IN AN UNDERGRADUATE INSTITUTION Eugene N. Parker University of Chicago Warren F. Rogers In recognition of many fundamental contributions to space physics, Indiana Wesleyan University plasma physics, solar physics and astrophysics for over 60 years.
    [Show full text]
  • TASI Lectures on Emergence of Supersymmetry, Gauge Theory And
    TASI Lectures on Emergence of Supersymmetry, Gauge Theory and String in Condensed Matter Systems Sung-Sik Lee1,2 1Department of Physics & Astronomy, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton ON L8S4M1, Canada 2Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. N., Waterloo ON N2L2Y5, Canada Abstract The lecture note consists of four parts. In the first part, we review a 2+1 dimen- sional lattice model which realizes emergent supersymmetry at a quantum critical point. The second part is devoted to a phenomenon called fractionalization where gauge boson and fractionalized particles emerge as low energy excitations as a result of strong interactions between gauge neutral particles. In the third part, we discuss about stability and low energy effective theory of a critical spin liquid state where stringy excitations emerge in a large N limit. In the last part, we discuss about an attempt to come up with a prescription to derive holographic theory for general quantum field theory. arXiv:1009.5127v2 [hep-th] 16 Dec 2010 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Emergent supersymmetry 2 2.1 Emergence of (bosonic) space-time symmetry . .... 3 2.2 Emergentsupersymmetry . .. .. 4 2.2.1 Model ................................... 5 2.2.2 RGflow .................................. 7 3 Emergent gauge theory 10 3.1 Model ....................................... 10 3.2 Slave-particletheory ............................... 10 3.3 Worldlinepicture................................. 12 4 Critical spin liquid with Fermi surface 14 4.1 Fromspinmodeltogaugetheory . 14 4.1.1 Slave-particle approach to spin-liquid states . 14 4.1.2 Stability of deconfinement phase in the presence of Fermi surface... 16 4.2 Lowenergyeffectivetheory . .. .. 17 4.2.1 Failure of a perturbative 1/N expansion ...............
    [Show full text]
  • Round Table Talk: Conversation with Nathan Seiberg
    Round Table Talk: Conversation with Nathan Seiberg Nathan Seiberg Professor, the School of Natural Sciences, The Institute for Advanced Study Hirosi Ooguri Kavli IPMU Principal Investigator Yuji Tachikawa Kavli IPMU Professor Ooguri: Over the past few decades, there have been remarkable developments in quantum eld theory and string theory, and you have made signicant contributions to them. There are many ideas and techniques that have been named Hirosi Ooguri Nathan Seiberg Yuji Tachikawa after you, such as the Seiberg duality in 4d N=1 theories, the two of you, the Director, the rest of about supersymmetry. You started Seiberg-Witten solutions to 4d N=2 the faculty and postdocs, and the to work on supersymmetry almost theories, the Seiberg-Witten map administrative staff have gone out immediately or maybe a year after of noncommutative gauge theories, of their way to help me and to make you went to the Institute, is that right? the Seiberg bound in the Liouville the visit successful and productive – Seiberg: Almost immediately. I theory, the Moore-Seiberg equations it is quite amazing. I don’t remember remember studying supersymmetry in conformal eld theory, the Afeck- being treated like this, so I’m very during the 1982/83 Christmas break. Dine-Seiberg superpotential, the thankful and embarrassed. Ooguri: So, you changed the direction Intriligator-Seiberg-Shih metastable Ooguri: Thank you for your kind of your research completely after supersymmetry breaking, and many words. arriving the Institute. I understand more. Each one of them has marked You received your Ph.D. at the that, at the Weizmann, you were important steps in our progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron-Ion Collider at Jlab: Conceptual Design, and Accelerator R&D
    Electron-Ion Collider at JLab: Conceptual Design, and Accelerator R&D Yuhong Zhang for JLab Electron-Ion Collider Accelerator Design Team DIS 2013 -- XXI International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scatterings and Related Subjects, Marseille, France, April 22-28, 2013 1 Outline • Introduction • Machine Design Baseline • Anticipated Performance • Accelerator R&D Highlights • Summary 2 Introduction • A Medium energy Electron-Ion Collider (MEIC) at JLab will open new frontiers in nuclear science. • The timing of MEIC construction can be tailored to match available DOE- ONP funding while the 12 GeV physics program continues. • MEIC parameters are chosen to optimize science, technology development, and project cost. • We maintain a well defined path for future upgrade to higher energies and luminosities. • A conceptual machine design has been completed recently, providing a base for performance evaluation, cost estimation, and technical risk assessment. • A design report was released on August, 2012. Y. Zhang, IMP Seminar3 3 MEIC Design Goals Base EIC Requirements per INT Report & White Paper • Energy (bridging the gap of 12 GeV CEBAF & HERA/LHeC) – Full coverage of s from a few 100 to a few 1000 GeV2 – Electrons 3-12 GeV, protons 20-100 GeV, ions 12-40 GeV/u • Ion species – Polarized light ions: p, d, 3He, and possibly Li, and polarized heavier ions – Un-polarized light to heavy ions up to A above 200 (Au, Pb) • Up to 2 detectors • Luminosity – Greater than 1034 cm-2s-1 per interaction point – Maximum luminosity should optimally be around √s=45 GeV • Polarization – At IP: longitudinal for both beams, transverse for ions only – All polarizations >70% desirable • Upgradeable to higher energies and luminosity – 20 GeV electron, 250 GeV proton, and 100 GeV/u ion Y.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSY, Landscape and the Higgs
    SUSY, Landscape and the Higgs Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz Workshop: Nature Guiding Theory, Fermilab 2014 Michael Dine SUSY, Landscape and the Higgs A tension between naturalness and simplicity There have been lots of good arguments to expect that some dramatic new phenomena should appear at the TeV scale to account for electroweak symmetry breaking. But given the exquisite successes of the Model, the simplest possibility has always been the appearance of a single Higgs particle, with a mass not much above the LEP exclusions. In Quantum Field Theory, simple has a precise meaning: a single Higgs doublet is the minimal set of additional (previously unobserved) degrees of freedom which can account for the elementary particle masses. Michael Dine SUSY, Landscape and the Higgs Higgs Discovery; LHC Exclusions So far, simplicity appears to be winning. Single light higgs, with couplings which seem consistent with the minimal Standard Model. Exclusion of a variety of new phenomena; supersymmetry ruled out into the TeV range over much of the parameter space. Tunings at the part in 100 1000 level. − Most other ideas (technicolor, composite Higgs,...) in comparable or more severe trouble. At least an elementary Higgs is an expectation of supersymmetry. But in MSSM, requires a large mass for stops. Michael Dine SUSY, Landscape and the Higgs Top quark/squark loop corrections to observed physical Higgs mass (A 0; tan β > 20) ≈ In MSSM, without additional degrees of freedom: 126 L 124 GeV H h m 122 120 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000 14 000 HMSUSYGeVL Michael Dine SUSY, Landscape and the Higgs 6y 2 δm2 = t m~ 2 log(Λ2=m2 ) H −16π2 t susy So if 8 TeV, correction to Higgs mass-squred parameter in effective action easily 1000 times the observed Higgs mass-squared.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2005.08389V1 [Physics.Acc-Ph] 17 May 2020
    Proceedings of the 2018 CERN–Accelerator–School course on Beam Instrumentation, Tuusula, (Finland) Beam Diagnostic Requirements: an Overview G. Kube Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg, Germany Abstract Beam diagnostics and instrumentation are an essential part of any kind of ac- celerator. There is a large variety of parameters to be measured for observation of particle beams with the precision required to tune, operate, and improve the machine. In the first part, the basic mechanisms of information transfer from the beam particles to the detector are described in order to derive suitable per- formance characteristics for the beam properties. However, depending on the type of accelerator, for the same parameter, the working principle of a monitor may strongly differ, and related to it also the requirements for accuracy. There- fore, in the second part, selected types of accelerators are described in order to illustrate specific diagnostics needs which must be taken into account before designing a related instrument. Keywords Particle field; beam signal; electron/hadron accelerator; instrumentation. 1 Introduction Nowadays particle accelerators play an important role in a wide number of fields, the number of acceler- ators worldwide is of the order of 30000 and constantly growing. While most of these devices are used for industrial and medical applications (ion implantation, electron beam material processing and irradia- tion, non-destructive inspection, radiotherapy, medical isotopes production, :::), the share of accelerators used for basic science is less than 1 % [1]. In order to cover such a wide range of applications different accelerator types are required. As an example, in the arts, the Louvre museum utilizes a 2 MV tandem Pelletron accelerator for ion beam anal- ysis studies [2].
    [Show full text]
  • TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server hep-th/0011376 SCIPP-00/30 TASI Lectures on The Strong CP Problem Michael Dine Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, Santa Cruz CA 95064 Abstract These lectures discuss the θ parameter of QCD. After an introduction to anomalies in four and two dimensions, the parameter is introduced. That such topological parameters can have physical effects is illustrated with two dimensional models, and then explained in QCD using instantons and current algebra. Possible solutions including axions, a massless up quark, and spontaneous CP violation are discussed. 1 Introduction Originally, one thought of QCD as being described a gauge coupling at a particular scale and the quark masses. But it soon came to be recognized that the theory has another parameter, the θ parameter, associated with an additional term in the lagrangian: 1 = θ F a F˜µνa (1) L 16π2 µν where 1 F˜a = F ρσa. (2) µνρσ 2 µνρσ This term, as we will discuss, is a total divergence, and one might imagine that it is irrelevant to physics, but this is not the case. Because the operator violates CP, it can contribute to the neutron electric 9 dipole moment, dn. The current experimental limit sets a strong limit on θ, θ 10− . The problem of why θ is so small is known as the strong CP problem. Understanding the problem and its possible solutions is the subject of this lectures. In thinking about CP violation in the Standard Model, one usually starts by counting the parameters of the unitary matrices which diagonalize the quark and lepton masses, and then counting the number of possible redefinitions of the quark and lepton fields.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical 1900 and 1913 Outbursts of the Binary Blazar Candidate OJ287
    A&A 559, A20 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219323 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics The historical 1900 and 1913 outbursts of the binary blazar candidate OJ287 R. Hudec1,2, M. Bašta3,P.Pihajoki4, and M. Valtonen5 1 Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Fricovaˇ 298, 251 65 Ondrejov,ˇ Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected] 2 Czech Technical University, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technicka 2, 160 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic 3 Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, University of Economics, 130 67 Prague, Czech Republic 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, 21500 Piikkio, Finland 5 Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO, University of Turku, 21500 Piikkio, Finland Received 31 March 2012 / Accepted 14 February 2013 ABSTRACT We report on historical optical outbursts in the OJ287 system in 1900 and 1913, detected on archival astronomical plates of the Harvard College Observatory. The 1900 outburst is reported for the first time. The first recorded outburst of the periodically active quasar OJ287 described before was observed in 1913. Up to now the information on this event was based on three points from plate archives. We used the Harvard plate collection, and added another seven observations to the light curve. The light curve is now well covered and allows one to determine the beginning of the outburst quite accurately. The outburst was longer and more energetic than the standard 1983 outburst. Should the system be strictly periodic, the period determined from these two outbursts would be 11.665 yr. However, this does not match the 1900 outburst or other prominent outbursts in the record.
    [Show full text]
  • IAU Symp 269, POST MEETING REPORTS
    IAU Symp 269, POST MEETING REPORTS C.Barbieri, University of Padua, Italy Content (i) a copy of the final scientific program, listing invited review speakers and session chairs; (ii) a list of participants, including their distribution on gender (iii) a list of recipients of IAU grants, stating amount, country, and gender; (iv) receipts signed by the recipients of IAU Grants (done); (v) a report to the IAU EC summarizing the scientific highlights of the meeting (1-2 pages). (vi) a form for "Women in Astronomy" statistics. (i) Final program Conference: Galileo's Medicean Moons: their Impact on 400 years of Discovery (IAU Symposium 269) Padova, Jan 6-9, 201 Program Wednesday 6, location: Centro San Gaetano, via Altinate 16.0 0 – 18.00 meeting of Scientific Committee (last details on the Symp 269; information on the IYA closing ceremony program) 18.00 – 20.00 welcome reception Thursday 7, morning: Aula Magna University 8:30 – late registrations 09.00 – 09.30 Welcome Addresses (Rector of University, President of COSPAR, Representative of ESA, President of IAU, Mayor of Padova, Barbieri) Session 1, The discovery of the Medicean Moons, the history, the influence on human sciences Chair: R. Williams Speaker Title 09.30 – 09.55 (1) G. Coyne Galileo's telescopic observations: the marvel and meaning of discovery 09.55 – 10.20 (2) D. Sobel Popular Perceptions of Galileo 10.20 – 10.45 (3) T. Owen The slow growth of human humility (read by Scott Bolton) 10.45 – 11.10 (4) G. Peruzzi A new Physics to support the Copernican system. Gleanings from Galileo's works 11.10 – 11.35 Coffee break Session 1b Chair: T.
    [Show full text]