Flaxleaf Aster (Ionactis Linariifolia)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Flaxleaf aster (Ionactis linariifolia) For definitions of botanical terms, visit en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_botanical_terms. Flaxleaf aster is a petite perennial wildflower that occurs in the sandhill and pine flatwoods communities of Florida’s Panhandle. It blooms primarily in October and November, but may bloom as early as September. The flowers attract a variety of pollinators, particularly bees and butterflies. Flaxleaf aster’s small (about 1 inch in diameter), compound flowers are born in clusters atop thin, rigid stems that branch out from a single base. Each flower consists of many lavender to whitish-purple ray florets Photo by Uli Lorimer (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) arranged around a center of yellow to reddish-orange disk florets. Leaves are relatively long (1–1½ inches), stiff and needle-like. Leaf arrangement may be alternate or whorled. The genus name Ionactus is from the Greek iódis, meaning “violet,” referring to the bloom color. The species epithet linariifolia is from the Latin linearis, or “linear,” and folium, meaning “leaves.” Flaxleaf aster was originally classified by Carolus Linnaeus as Aster linariifolius, but was later moved to its own genus. Family: Asteraceae (Aster, composite or daisy family) Native range: Panhandle, from Wakulla County west, and Nassau County To see where natural populations of Flaxleaf aster have been vouchered, visit www.florida.plantatlas.usf.edu. Hardiness: Zones 8A–9B Soil: Dry to moist, well-drained sandy soils Exposure: Full sun to partial shade Growth habit: < 2’ tall Flaxleaf aster may occasionally be available from nurseries that specialize in Florida native plants. Visit www.PlantRealFlorida.org to find a nursery in your area. Florida Wildflower Foundation • 225 S. Swoope Ave., Suite 110, Maitland, FL 32751 • 407-622-1606 • www.FlaWildflowers.org.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
[Show full text]
Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
[Show full text]
State of New York City's Plants 2018
STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
[Show full text]
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
[Show full text]
Native Plants Which Support Insects
Native Meadow Plants for Butterflies, Moths and Other Insects Dry Meadow Perennials Agastache foeniculum (Anise hyssop) Allium cernuum (Nodding onion) Antennaria spp. (Pussy-toes) Aquilegia canadensis (Columbine) Aruncus dioicus (Goats beard) Asclepias spp. (Milkweed) Ionactis linariifolia (Flax-leaf white top aster) Baptisia tinctoria (Yellow wild indigo) Callirhoe spp. (Poppy mallow) Campanula rotundifolia (Thread-leaf bellflower) Chrysopsis villosa (Golden hairy aster) Coreopsis verticillata (Tickseed) Dicentra spp. (Bleeding heart) Echinacea spp. (Coneflower) Eryngium yuccifolium (False Yucca) Geranium maculatum (Wild geranium) Helianthus mollis (Sunflower) Heliopsis helianthoides (Oxeye) Lupinus perennis (Sundial lupine) Monarda punctata (Horsemint) Opuntia humifusa (Eastern prickly pear) Penstemon digitalis (Foxglove beardtongue) Pycnanthemum tenuifolium (Narrow leaf mountain mint) Ratibida spp. (Mexican hat) Rudbeckia spp. (Black-eyed Susan) Solidago spp. (Goldenrod) Vernonia letermannii (Ironweed) Viola pedata (Birds foot violet) Courtesy of Dan Jaffe Propagator and Stock Bed Grower New England Wild Flower Society [email protected] Native Meadow Plants for Butterflies, Moths and Other Insects Moist Meadow Perennials Amsonia spp. (Blue star) Asclepias incarnata (Swamp milkweed) Boltonia asteroides (False aster) Chelone glabra (White turtlehead) Conradina verticillata (False rosemary) Eutrochium spp. (Joe-Pye weed) Filipendula rubra (Queen of the prairie) Gentiana clausa (Bottle gentian) Liatris novae-angliae (New England
[Show full text]
The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014
The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014 In the pages that follow are treatments that have been revised since the publication of the Jepson eFlora, Revision 1 (July 2013). The information in these revisions is intended to supersede that in the second edition of The Jepson Manual (2012). The revised treatments, as well as errata and other small changes not noted here, are included in the Jepson eFlora (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html). For a list of errata and small changes in treatments that are not included here, please see: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/JM12_errata.html Citation for the entire Jepson eFlora: Jepson Flora Project (eds.) [year] Jepson eFlora, http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html [accessed on month, day, year] Citation for an individual treatment in this supplement: [Author of taxon treatment] 2014. [Taxon name], Revision 2, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, [URL for treatment]. Accessed on [month, day, year]. Copyright © 2014 Regents of the University of California Supplement II, Page 1 Summary of changes made in Revision 2 of the Jepson eFlora, December 2014 PTERIDACEAE *Pteridaceae key to genera: All of the CA members of Cheilanthes transferred to Myriopteris *Cheilanthes: Cheilanthes clevelandii D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris clevelandii (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes cooperae D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris cooperae (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes covillei Maxon changed to Myriopteris covillei (Maxon) Á. Löve & D. Löve, as native Cheilanthes feei T. Moore changed to Myriopteris gracilis Fée, as native Cheilanthes gracillima D.
[Show full text]
A Nomenclator of Diplostephium (Asteraceae: Astereae): a List of Species with Their Synonyms and Distribution by Country
32 LUNDELLIA DECEMBER, 2011 A NOMENCLATOR OF DIPLOSTEPHIUM (ASTERACEAE: ASTEREAE): A LIST OF SPECIES WITH THEIR SYNONYMS AND DISTRIBUTION BY COUNTRY Oscar M. Vargas Integrative Biology and Plant Resources Center, 1 University Station CO930, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712 U.S.A Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Abstract: Since the description of Diplostephium by Kunth in 1820, more than 200 Diplostephium taxa have been described. In the absence of a recent revision of the genus, a nomenclator of Diplostephium is provided based on an extensive review of the taxonomic literature, herbarium material, and databases. Here, 111 species recognized in the literature are listed along with their reference citations, types, synonyms, subspecific divisions, and distributions by country. In addition, a list of doubtful names and Diplostephium names now considered to be associated with other taxa is provided. Resumen: Desde la descripcioń del genero Diplostephium por Kunth en 1820, mas de 200 nombres han sido publicados bajo Diplostephium. En ausencia de un estudio taxono´mico actualizado, se presenta una lista de nombres de Diplostephium basada en una revisioń extensiva de la literaura taxono´mica, material de herbario y bases de datos. En este estudio se listan las 111 especies reconocidas hasta ahora, incluyendo informacioń acerca de la publicacioń de la especie, tipos, sinońimos, divisioń subgene´rica y distribuciones por paı´s. Adicionalmente se provee una lista de nombres dudosos y nombres de Diplostephium que se consideran estar asociados con otros taxones. Keywords: Asteraceae, Astereae, Diplostephium, nomenclator. Diplostephium is a genus of small trees, (ROSMARINIFOLIA,FLORIBUNDA,DENTICU- shrubs, and sub-shrubs that range from LATA,RUPESTRIA, and LAVANDULIFOLIA 5 Costa Rica to northern Chile.
[Show full text]
The Magazine of the Arnold Arboretum VOLUME 77 • NUMBER 3
The Magazine of the Arnold Arboretum VOLUME 77 • NUMBER 3 The Magazine of the Arnold Arboretum VOLUME 77 • NUMBER 3 • 2020 CONTENTS Arnoldia (ISSN 0004–2633; USPS 866–100) 2 A Cottage Flora is published quarterly by the Arnold Arboretum Cat Meholic of Harvard University. Periodicals postage paid at Boston, Massachusetts. 6 Beyond the Trees: An Herbaceous Shift Subscriptions are $20.00 per calendar year at the Arnold Arboretum domestic, $25.00 foreign, payable in advance. Brendan Keegan Remittances may be made in U.S. dollars, by check drawn on a U.S. bank; by international 14 A Lily from the Valley money order; or by Visa, Mastercard, or American Michael S. Dosmann Express. Send orders, remittances, requests to purchase back issues, change-of-address notices, 26 Confronting Climate Change at an Urban and all other subscription-related communica- Grassland: Preserving and Restoring the tions to Circulation Manager, Arnoldia, Arnold Grasslands at Green-Wood Arboretum, 125 Arborway, Boston, MA 02130- Joseph Charap, Sara Evans, 3500. Telephone 617.524.1718; fax 617.524.1418; and Frank S. Rossi e-mail [email protected] Arnold Arboretum members receive a subscrip- 32 Each Year in the Forest: Winter tion to Arnoldia as a membership benefit. To Andrew L. Hipp become a member or receive more information, Illustrated by Rachel D. Davis please call Wendy Krauss at 617.384.5766 or email [email protected] 40 Promise of Bark: Eucommia ulmoides Postmaster: Send address changes to Kathryn Richardson Arnoldia Circulation Manager Front and back cover: Urban grasslands are a dominant The Arnold Arboretum feature in cities like Boston and New York.
[Show full text]
SELECTED NATIVE PLANTS for BIRDS and POLLINATORS in THE
SELECTED NATIVE PLANTS FOR BIRDS and POLLINATORS IN THE PIEDMONT AREA OF NORTH CAROLINA 12/31/2020 NC NC Wild Tend to # of Sun/ Soil Flower & fruit Drought Benefit to Audubon Flower of Common name Scientific name Height Width be deer caterpillars Special Notes Shade moisture dates tolerant Wildlife plant of the Year resistant supported the year Trees Maples Acer spp. NE,SE, LH 254 Red A. rubrum 40-75' 20-50' s-ps w,m Jan-Mar; Apr-Jul x x Southern Sugar A.floridanum 40-60' 40-60' s-ps m Apr-May; Jun-Oct 2018 Northern Sugar A. saccarum 60-80 25-60' s-ps m Apr-Jun; Jun-Sep 2018 Northern is drought sensitive Chalk A. leucoderme (native) 20-30' 15-25' s-ps m, d Mar-Apr; Apr-Sep x Pawpaws Asimina spp. BE, LH 12 Need more than one Common A. triloba, 8-35' 6-10' ps-sh m Mar-May; Aug-Oct x genetic strain for best fruit set. Dwarf A. parviflora 3-12' 2-6' s-ps m,d Apr–May; Jul–Sep x Species is drought sensitive. River birch Betula nigra 40-80' 15-25' s-ps w, m Mar-Apr; May-Jun x x LH, SE 299 Ironwood, Carpinus caroliniana 15-35' 12-18' s-sh w, m Mar-Apr; Sep-Oct SE, LH 71 Drought sensitive American hornbeam Size, growing conditions vary by Hickories Carya spp. 60-100' s-ps w, m, d Apr-May; Oct SE, LH 242 species Hackberries Celtis spp NE,BE,LH 47 Southern C.
[Show full text]
Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
[Show full text]
Missouriensis Volume 25, 2004 (2005)
Missouriensis Volume 25, 2004 (2005) In this issue: The Flora and Natural History of Woods Prairie, a Nature Reserve in Southwestern Missouri Andrew L. Thomas, Sam Gibson, and Nels J. Holmberg ....... 1 Plant Changes for the 2005 “Missouri Species and Communities of Conservation Concern Checklist” Timothy E. Smith .......................................................................... 20 How Faster to Master the Aster Disaster: A Primer on the Changing Nomenclature of Missouri Asters George Yatskievych ...................................................................... 26 Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society Missouriensis, Volume 25 2004 [2005] 1 THE FLORA AND NATURAL HISTORY OF WOODS PRAIRIE, A NATURE RESERVE IN SOUTHWESTERN MISSOURI Andrew L. Thomas Southwest Research Center, University of Missouri–Columbia 14548 Highway H, Mt. Vernon, MO 65712 Sam Gibson Department of Biology (retired) Missouri Southern State University, Joplin, MO 64801 Nels J. Holmberg 530 W Whiskey Creek Rd, Washington, MO 63090 Woods Prairie is a scenic and rare refuge of unplowed native tallgrass prairie on the northwestern fringe of the Ozarks bioregion in southwestern Missouri. This isolated 40-acre prairie remnant near the town of Mt. Vernon was part of a 1,700-acre homestead settled in 1836 by John Blackburn Woods of Tennessee. For four generations, the Woods family carefully managed the prairie while protecting it from the plow as all other nearby prairies were destroyed. By 1999, less than 40 acres of the original vast prairie remained, and John’s great granddaughter, Mary Freda (Woods) O’Connell, sold it to the Ozark Regional Land Trust (ORLT, Carthage, MO), to be protected in perpetuity as a nature reserve for public study and enjoyment. ORLT, a non-profit conservation organization founded in 1984 to protect the unique natural features of the Ozarks, completed the purchase on May 27, 1999 through a unique, complex scheme detailed in Thomas and Galbraith (2003).
[Show full text]
Progress and Results Report Task 7: Covered Species Population Trends and Ecosystem Health Tracking
Project Name: Science Advisor Project Number: 2005-DRI-574A-P Deliverable Number: D14 Reporting Period: October 1, 2007 – March 31, 2008 Project Contact Name and Information: Mark Stone, Division of Hydrological Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 775 E Flamingo Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89119. [email protected], 702 862 5457. Progress and Results Report Task 7: Covered Species Population Trends and Ecosystem Health Tracking INTRODUCTION The Desert Research Institute (DRI) is under contract to Clark County (County) to provide programmatic analysis and science advice to the Desert Conservation Program (DCP) and the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Implementing Agreement signatory agencies. The activity undertaken under this contract will place the DCP and County in compliance with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Section 10 Incidental Take Permit (#TE 034927-0) requirement that the Adaptive Management Program have an objective, science-based adaptive management consultant providing independent assessment of MSHCP implementation. Progress accomplished for Task 7 is described below; this task includes two components: 1— Covered Species Population Trends and 2—Ecosystem Health Tracking. Covered Species Population Trends In June, 2007, the County provided DRI with all available species data in ArcMap personal geodatabase format. This database contains sensitive data and is not to be externally circulated or made available. Other data provided by the County at this time included a snail database, the Virgin Rivers data, and Arc files containing reference data. Based on available data, DRI was asked to develop a template for future projects relating to covered species population tracking, and provide a prototype of a tool for tracking population data containing information on 12 of the covered species.
[Show full text]