DOCSLIB.ORG

Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping: Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping: Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Reviewers: Species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Wiegand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project. Citation: Slattery, Britt E., Kathryn Reshetiloff, and Susan M. Zwicker. 2003, 2005. Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping: Chesapeake Bay Watershed. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office, Annapolis, MD. 82 pp. Document may also be found online at: http://www.nps.gov/plants/pubs/chesapeake/ First printing, 2003 Second printing, 2005 Third printing, 2009 Fourth printing 2012 The Native Plant Center Citizens, schools, nonprofit organizations, and government agencies use this resource to select native plants to create landscapes to attract wildlife and reduce pollutants going into the Chesapeake Bay. To reach even more citizens, the Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service created an online version of this guide, the Native Plant Center -- Chesapeake Region, www.nativeplantcenter.net. This online guide includes a geo-locator feature to quickly identify plants suited to your location. Table of Contents Introduction Benefits of Conservation Landscaping ..........................................................................................3 Why Use Native Plants .................................................................................................................4 Other Conservation Landscaping Elements...................................................................................4 How to Choose Plants ..................................................................................................................6 Where to Find Native Plants .........................................................................................................6 How To Use This Guide Plant Names and Types ................................................................................................................7 Characteristics .............................................................................................................................7 Growth Conditions ........................................................................................................................8 Habitat .........................................................................................................................................9 Native To (Where to Use) .............................................................................................................9 Wildlife Value ...............................................................................................................................9 Notes .........................................................................................................................................10 Plant Information Pages Ferns .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Grasses & Grasslike Plants ......................................................................................................... 14 Herbaceous Plants ...................................................................................................................... 18 Herbaceous Emergents ..............................................................................................................41 Shrubs ........................................................................................................................................ 45 Trees .......................................................................................................................................... 54 Vines .......................................................................................................................................... 64 Plants with a Purpose Plants for Coastal Dunes ............................................................................................................ 66 Plants for Saltwater or Brackish Water Marshes ........................................................................ 66 Plants for Freshwater Wetlands and Other Wet Sites ................................................................ 67 Plants Appropriate for Bogs or Bog Gardens ............................................................................... 68 Plants for Dry Meadows ............................................................................................................. 68 Plants for Wet Meadows ...........................................................................................................69 Plants for Forest or Woodland Plantings ..................................................................................... 69 Solutions for Slopes ................................................................................................................... 71 Evergreens ................................................................................................................................. 72 Plants to Use as Groundcovers ................................................................................................... 72 Plants for Spring and Fall Color ................................................................................................... 72 Deer Resistant Plants .................................................................................................................73 Photo Credits ...............................................................................................................................74 References ...................................................................................................................................75 Index ...............................................................................................................................................79 1 To the Reader The use of native plants in landscaping and of course habitat restoration is certainly not new. In fact, their use has grown exponentially in recent years. Natural resources professionals in turn have been flooded with requests for information on native plants to use in various types of planting projects. Communities, schools, businesses, nonprofit organizations, watershed groups, local governments, state and federal agencies and many others are enhancing and restoring habitat, solving ecological problems, reducing maintenance, or just beautifying surroundings, all using locally native plants. Natural resources professionals, in turn, have been flooded with requests for information on native plants to use in various types of planting projects. There are many excellent resources available on native plants - some more technical than others, some more comprehensive than others. The frustration voiced most frequently by users is the lack of color photographs of the plants. After all, it is the striking visual quality of these plants that is their best “selling point.” This publication includes those pictures as well as user-friendly information on native species appropriate for planting in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and adjacent coastal regions. Although one guide cannot furnish the answers to every question, we have included as much useful information as possible in a limited space. Although the large number of species of plants included here may overwhelm some readers, this guide displays the great diversity of plants available. We hope you will bypass the over-used, non-native and sometimes invasive ornamental plants, and select the equally and often more attractive native plants. Pour through this guide the same way you look through nursery catalogs. Use it to plan and design your next planting, whether it’s a small corner of your front yard, a two-acre meadow seeding, or 100 acres of wetland restoration. 2 Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping: Chesapeake Bay Watershed Introduction “Conservation landscaping” refers to landscaping with specific goals of reducing pollution and improving the local environment. In the Chesapeake Bay watershed (the land that drains to the Bay and its many tributaries), this style of landscaping is sometimes called “BayScaping,” or beneficial landscaping. Conservation landscaping provides habitat for local and migratory animals,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Diplycosia Indica (2009) to Gaultheria Akaensis (2006)
    Panda, S., J.L. Reveal, and M. Sanjappa. 2012. Reduction of Diplycosia indica (2009) to Gaultheria akaensis (2006). Phytoneuron 2012-35: 1–7. Published 23 April 2012. ISSN 2153 733X REDUCTION OF DIPLYCOSIA INDICA (2009) TO GAULTHERIA AKAENSIS (2006) (ERICACEAE) SUBHASIS PANDA Taxonomy & Biosystematics Laboratory, Post-Graduate Department of Botany Darjeeling Government College, Darjeeling-734101 INDIA [email protected] JAMES L. REVEAL L.H. Bailey Hortorium, Department of Plant Biology Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-4301 USA [email protected] MUNIVENKATAPPA SANJAPPA Former Director, Botanical Survey of India Presently at Botanical Garden, University of Agricultural Sciences GKVK, Bengaluru-560064 INDIA ABSTRACT Diplycosia indica M.R. Debta & H.J. Chowdhery is reduced to synonymy under Gaultheria akaensis Panda & Sanjappa due to a misinterpretation of immature floral features of the type material used by Debta and Chowdhery to establish their new species. KEY WORDS : nomenclature, synonymy, India, Singalelah National Park Diplycosia indica was described by Debta and Chowdhery (2009) based on two specimens collected by M.R. Debta in the Singalelah National Park area of the Darjeeling Himalaya. During the course of recent field studies (mid-December 2011) at different locations in Singalelah National Park as part of post-revisionary work in Indian Ericaceae, specimens of a species of Gaultheria L. were collected near Megma, Megma-Tonglu road and in the Kainyakata-Kalapokhri area on rocky slopes near adjacent road sides. The Gaultheria was identified as G. akaensis Panda & Sanjappa (2006), a critically endangered species then known only from Aka Hill in the Arunachal Himalaya. This expression of G. akaensis from the Singalelah National Park then proved to be identical to the type of D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Coptis Trifolia Conservation Assessment
    CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT for Coptis trifolia (L.) Salisb. Originally issued as Management Recommendations December 1998 Marty Stein Reconfigured-January 2005 Tracy L. Fuentes USDA Forest Service Region 6 and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT FOR COPTIS TRIFOLIA Table of Contents Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 2 Summary........................................................................................................................................ 4 I. NATURAL HISTORY............................................................................................................. 6 A. Taxonomy and Nomenclature.......................................................................................... 6 B. Species Description ........................................................................................................... 6 1. Morphology ................................................................................................................... 6 2. Reproductive Biology.................................................................................................... 7 3. Ecological Roles ............................................................................................................. 7 C. Range and Sites
    [Show full text]
  • Chamaecyparis Lawsoniana: Lawson Falsecypress1 Edward F
    ENH313 Chamaecyparis lawsoniana: Lawson Falsecypress1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 Introduction General Information Often seen at 40 to 60 feet tall by 15 feet wide in its culti- Scientific name: Chamaecyparis lawsoniana vated form, this North American native can soar to heights Pronunciation: kam-eh-SIP-uh-riss law-so-nee-AY-nuh of 100 to 150 feet in the wild. The massive, thick trunk and Common name(s): Lawson falsecypress, Port Orford cedar formal, upright, conical silhouette is softened by the gently Family: Cupressaceae weeping tips of the short, upright branches. The flattened, USDA hardiness zones: 5B through 7B (Fig. 2) dark blue-green branchlets have a delicate, almost fern-like Origin: native to North America appearance, and are nicely complemented by the rough, Invasive potential: little invasive potential deeply furrowed, reddish-brown bark. Available in a wide Uses: specimen; screen; bonsai variety of forms and bluish foliage colors, Lawson falsecy- Availability: not native to North America press still remains today an important timber trees from the Pacific Northwest. But it is rare in the nursery trade and probably not well adapted to most landscapes. Figure 2. Range Description Height: 40 to 60 feet Spread: 15 to 25 feet Crown uniformity: symmetrical Figure 1. Mature Chamaecyparis lawsoniana: Lawson Falsecypress 1. This document is ENH313, one of a series of the Environmental Horticulture, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date November 1993. Reviewed May 2014. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Edward F. Gilman, professor, Environmental Horticulture Department; Dennis G. Watson, former associate professor, Agricultural Engineering Department, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville FL 32611.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Native Trees and Large Shrubs for the Washington, D.C. Area
    Green Spring Gardens 4603 Green Spring Rd ● Alexandria ● VA 22312 Phone: 703-642-5173 ● TTY: 703-803-3354 www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/greenspring NON - NATIVE TREES AND LARGE SHRUBS ­ FOR THE WASHINGTON, D.C. AREA ­ Non-native trees are some of the most beloved plants in the landscape due to their beauty. In addition, these trees are grown for the shade, screening, structure, and landscape benefits they provide. Deciduous trees, whose leaves die and fall off in the autumn, are valuable additions to landscapes because of their changing interest throughout the year. Evergreen trees are valued for their year-round beauty and shelter for wildlife. Evergreens are often grouped into two categories, broadleaf evergreens and conifers. Broadleaf evergreens have broad, flat leaves. They also may have showy flowers, such as Camellia oleifera (a large shrub), or colorful fruits, such as Nellie R. Stevens holly. Coniferous evergreens either have needle-like foliage, such as the lacebark pine, or scale-like foliage, such as the green giant arborvitae. Conifers do not have true flowers or fruits but bear cones. Though most conifers are evergreen, exceptions exist. Dawn redwood, for example, loses its needles each fall. The following are useful definitions: Cultivar (cv.) - a cultivated variety designated by single quotes, such as ‘Autumn Gold’. A variety (var.) or subspecies (subsp.), in contrast, is found in nature and is a subdivision of a species (a variety of Cedar of Lebanon is listed). Full Shade - the amount of light under a dense deciduous tree canopy or beneath evergreens. Full Sun - at least 6 hours of sun daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants at the UHCC
    Flora Checklist Texas Institute for Coastal Prairie Research and Education University of Houston Donald Verser created this list by combining lists from studies by Grace and Siemann with the UHCC herbarium list Herbarium Collections Family Scientific Name Synonym Common Name Native Growth Accesion Dates Locality Comments Status Habit Numbers Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis fringeleaf wild petunia N forb 269 10/9/1973 Acanthaceae Ruellia nudiflora violet wild petunia N forb Agavaceae Manfreda virginica false aloe N forb Agavaceae Polianthes sp. polianthes ? forb 130 8/3/1971 2004 roadside Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron radicans eastern poison ivy N woody/vine Apiaceae Centella erecta Centella asiatica erect centella N forb 36 4/11/2000 Area 2 Apiaceae Daucus carota Queen Anne's lace I forb 139-142 1971 / 72 No collections by Dr. Brown. Perhaps Apiaceae Eryngium leavenworthii Leavenworth's eryngo N forb 144 7/20/1971 wooded area in pipeline ROW E. hookeri instead? Apiaceae Eryngium yuccifolium button eryngo N forb 77,143,145 71, 72, 2000 Apiaceae Polytaenia texana Polytaenia nuttallii Texas prairie parsley N forb 32 6/6/2002 Apocynaceae Amsonia illustris Ozark bluestar N Forb 76 3/24/2000 Area 4 Apocynaceae Amsonia tabernaemontana eastern bluestar N Forb Aquifoliaceae Ilex vomitoria yaupon N woody Asclepiadaceae Asclepias lanceolata fewflower milkweed N Forb Not on Dr. Brown's list. Would be great record. Asclepiadaceae Asclepias longifolia longleaf milkweed N Forb 84 6/7/2000 Area 6 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias verticillata whorled milkweed N Forb 35 6/7/2002 Area 7 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias viridis green antelopehorn N Forb 63, 92 1974 & 2000 Asteraceae Acmella oppositifolia var.
    [Show full text]
  • Pages 121-166
    Cost Analysis Figure 21. Estimated Unit Costs for Installation and Maintenance Procedures (2004) Costs are based on average conditions calculated from research plot applications. Costs can vary considerably depending on specific site conditions. These examples are intended for comparison purposes and should not be used as bid prices. Note: Estimated costs do not include bark mulch applied as a continuous bed. If that is the desired treatment, an additional mulch materials and application cost would apply. Estimated costs do not include plant or installation warranties. Enhancing Delaware Highways Cost Analysis 122 Figure 21. Estimated Costs for Installation and Maintenance, for comparison (2004) Drilling holes prior to planting quart containers. Note: Estimated costs do not include bark mulch applied as a continuous bed. If that is the desired treatment, an additional mulch materials and application cost would apply. Estimated costs do not include plant or installation warranties. Enhancing Delaware Highways Cost Analysis 124 Appendix A: Checklists–Inventory of Site Conditions 2. Roadway Limitations Checklist Check the roadside zone(s) included in the location to be landscaped: J Back slope or cut slope J Swale or ditch zone 1. Climate and Growth Conditions Checklist J Approach or shoulder zone J Edge or border zone J Front or fill slope Check the appropriate clear zone requirement: Check the appropriate cold hardiness zone: J Standard 30 feet J Other ( feet) J Zone 6 or J Zone 7 Presence of guard rail and/or barrier curb: Guard rail
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Plants For
    Perennials, Ground Covers, Annuals & Bulbs Scientific name Common name Achillea millefolium Common Yarrow Alchemilla mollis Lady's Mantle Aster novae-angliae New England Aster Astilbe spp. Astilbe Carex glauca Blue Sedge Carex grayi Morningstar Sedge Carex stricta Tussock Sedge Ceratostigma plumbaginoides Leadwort/Plumbago Chelone glabra White Turtlehead Chrysanthemum spp. Chrysanthemum Convallaria majalis Lily-of-the-Valley Coreopsis lanceolata Lanceleaf Tickseed Coreopsis rosea Rosy Coreopsis Coreopsis tinctoria Golden Tickseed Coreopsis verticillata Threadleaf Coreopsis Dryopteris erythrosora Autumn Fern Dryopteris marginalis Leatherleaf Wood Fern Echinacea purpurea 'Magnus' Magnus Coneflower Epigaea repens Trailing Arbutus Eupatorium coelestinum Hardy Ageratum Eupatorium hyssopifolium Hyssopleaf Thoroughwort Eupatorium maculatum Joe-Pye Weed Eupatorium perfoliatum Boneset Eupatorium purpureum Sweet Joe-Pye Weed Geranium maculatum Wild Geranium Hedera helix English Ivy Hemerocallis spp. Daylily Hibiscus moscheutos Rose Mallow Hosta spp. Plantain Lily Hydrangea quercifolia Oakleaf Hydrangea Iris sibirica Siberian Iris Iris versicolor Blue Flag Iris Lantana camara Yellow Sage Liatris spicata Gay-feather Liriope muscari Blue Lily-turf Liriope variegata Variegated Liriope Lobelia cardinalis Cardinal Flower Lobelia siphilitica Blue Cardinal Flower Lonicera sempervirens Coral Honeysuckle Narcissus spp. Daffodil Nepeta x faassenii Catmint Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive Fern Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon Fern Pelargonium x domesticum Martha Washington
    [Show full text]
  • Podalonia Affinis on the Sefton Coast in 2019
    The status and distribution of solitary bee Stelis ornatula and solitary wasp Podalonia affinis on the Sefton Coast in 2019 Ben Hargreaves The Wildlife Trust for Lancashire, Manchester & North Merseyside October 2019 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to Tanyptera Trust for funding the research and to Natural England, National Trust and Lancashire Wildlife Trust for survey permissions. 2 CONTENTS Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 Aims and objectives………………………………………………………………………….6 Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………..6 Results……………………………………………………………………………………………..7 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Follow-up work………………………………………………………………………………11 References……………………………………………………………………………………..11 3 SUMMARY The Wildlife Trust for Lancashire, Manchester & North Merseyside (Lancashire Wildlife Trust) were commissioned by Liverpool Museum’s Tanyptera project to undertake targeted survey of Nationally Rare (and regionally rare) aculeate bees and wasps on various sites on the Sefton Coast. Podalonia affinis is confirmed as extant on the Sefton Coast; it is definitely present at Ainsdale NNR and is possibly present at Freshfield Dune Heath. Stelis ornatula, Mimesa bruxellensis and Bombus humilis are not confirmed as currently present at the sites surveyed for this report. A total of 141 records were made (see attached data list) of 48 aculeate species. The majority of samples were of aculeate wasps (Sphecidae, Crabronidae and Pompilidae). 4 INTRODUCTION PRIMARY SPECIES (Status) Stelis ornatula There are 9 records of this species for VC59 between 1975 and 2000. All the records are from the Sefton Coast. The host of this parasitic species is Hoplitis claviventris which is also recorded predominantly from the coast (in VC59). All records are from Ainsdale National Nature Reserve (NNR) and Formby (Formby Point and Ravenmeols Dunes). Podalonia affinis There are 15 VC59 records for this species which includes both older, unconfirmed records and more recent confirmed records based on specimens.
    [Show full text]