China Vs. Democracy the Greatest Game

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

China Vs. Democracy the Greatest Game CHINA VS. DEMOCRACY THE GREATEST GAME A HANDBOOK FOR DEMOCRACIES By Robin Shepherd, HFX Vice President ABOUT HFX HFX convenes the annual Halifax International Security Forum, the world’s preeminent gathering for leaders committed to strengthening strategic cooperation among democracies. The flagship meeting in Halifax, Nova Scotia brings together select leaders in politics, business, militaries, the media, and civil society. HFX published this handbook for democracies in November 2020 to advance its global mission. halifaxtheforum.org CHINA VS. DEMOCRACY: THE GREATEST GAME ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, HFX acknowledges Many experts from around the world the more than 250 experts it interviewed took the time to review drafts of this from around the world who helped to handbook. Steve Tsang, Director of the reappraise China and the challenge it China Institute at the School of Oriental poses to the world’s democracies. Their and African Studies (SOAS) in London, willingness to share their expertise and made several important suggestions varied opinions was invaluable. Of course, to early versions of chapters one and they bear no responsibility, individually or two. Peter Hefele, Head of Department collectively, for this handbook’s contents, Asia and Pacific, and David Merkle, Desk which are entirely the work of HFX. O!cer China, at Germany’s Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung made a number of This project began as a series of meetings very helpful suggestions. Ambassador hosted by Baroness Neville-Jones at the Hemant Singh, Director General of the U.K. House of Lords in London in 2019. Delhi Policy Group (DPG), and Brigadier At one of those meetings, Baroness Arun Sahgal (retired), DPG Senior Fellow Neville-Jones, who has been a stalwart for Strategic and Regional Security, friend and supporter since HFX began in provided vital perspective from India. 2009, pointedly declared that there was Ambassador Kenichiro Sasae, President no common strategy among the world’s of the Japan Institute of International democracies with regard to China, A"airs, did the same from Japan. Roland and that there ought to be one. This Paris, Professor of International A"airs at handbook seeks to contribute toward the University of Ottawa, made several building that common strategy. important suggestions from Canada. Admiral Mike Rogers (retired), former The handbook itself was authored by Director of the United States National Robin Shepherd, HFX Vice President, in Security Agency (NSA) and former cooperation with a team of colleagues Commander of U.S. Cyber Command, and collaborators including Paz Magat, made similarly helpful comments; as did Director of HFX’s Peace With Women John Mullen, former Assistant Director of Fellowship, who led the research, the CIA for East Asia & Pacific. Andrew Fishbein, HFX Head of Policy Relations, who coordinated the project, While this handbook benefited and Michael R. Auslin, the Payson J. significantly from the observations of Treat Distinguished Research Fellow the above experts, none of them bears in Contemporary Asia at the Hoover any responsibility for its shortcomings. Institution and HFX’s Senior Advisor for Each has a unique view on China. Some Asia, who provided general oversight. of the di"erences between these views John Gans joined the team as editor of are significant while in other cases it is far the handbook late in the process. HFX is more nuanced. In no sense should they grateful to John for his expert guidance be regarded as endorsing the handbook’s and magnificent teamwork. contents or its conclusions. CHINA VS. DEMOCRACY: THE GREATEST GAME TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword by Peter Van Praagh 2 Executive Summary 4 Introduction: Lost in Translation 7 Chapter 1: Home Rules 16 Chapter 2: Democracies in the Crosshairs 24 Chapter 3: The Business of Tyranny 34 Chapter 4: China’s Tech Authoritarianism 42 Chapter 5: Strategic Calculation 50 Chapter 6: Stronger Together 60 HFX China Principles 70 Appendix • Interviewees 72 • Notes 80 A HANDBOOK FOR DEMOCRACIES 1 FOREWORD: PETER VAN PRAAGH FOREWORD PETER VAN PRAAGH This is a handbook. It is a handbook its enormous population and economy about China for democracies. It is exerted comprehensive global influence. perhaps the first comprehensive The new conventional wisdom concludes compendium of vital information about that surrendering to this dark destiny is the very serious and urgent test that not an option. now confronts the world’s democracies. It delivers an overwhelming body Working in concert, the world’s of evidence to explain why people democracies have overwhelming around the world, and their democratic advantages that China cannot meet. The governments, have, perhaps belatedly, challenge is no longer about trying to woken up to the hard reality that Beijing cooperate with a rising China governed is not our friend. by autocrats. The real China challenge for the world’s democracies is how to HFX spent the past decade calling cooperate e"ectively with each other. attention to the challenge China poses through panel discussions at our annual Demand calls for a comprehensive global Forum in Halifax. But it was not until strategy among the world’s democracies 2020, with the emergence of the global outlining what to do with regard to China, coronavirus pandemic that began in and how to do it. Before that strategy, Wuhan, China, and all the uncertainty however, there has to be common that accompanied it, that people understanding of what confronts the around the world began to understand democratic community of nations. the real threat—to our supply chains, to international organizations, to the This handbook contributes to building open exchange of information, to the that necessary common understanding. protection of confidential information, and to freedom of the seas and skies. Through conversations with more than 250 experts from around the The 2020 paradigm shift in people’s world, including cabinet secretaries attitudes toward China was a concrete from the Clinton, Bush, and Obama change from the old conventional administrations, HFX prepared an wisdom that an economically vibrant overwhelming case for increased China would progress toward more cooperation. freedom for its people, to the new conventional wisdom that the Chinese For its part, this handbook concludes Communist Party is, in fact, the virus that with a set of principles that HFX will endangers the world. be championing around the world. I respectfully invite you to join your voice Old conventional wisdom also suggested with ours in defending the values that that if demography was indeed destiny, it underpin our democratic societies. was only a matter of time until China and Peter Van Praagh President, HFX 2 CHINA VS. DEMOCRACY: THE GREATEST GAME FOREWORD: PETER VAN PRAAGH “THE REAL CHINA CHALLENGE FOR THE WORLD’S DEMOCRACIES IS HOW TO COOPERATE EFFECTIVELY WITH EACH OTHER.” A HANDBOOK FOR DEMOCRACIES 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The year 2020 witnessed a paradigm challenge and result in continued policy shift in the world’s understanding of mistakes. China. Democracies have acknowledged implicitly and explicitly that their All leading human rights organizations approach to Beijing over the last testify that oppression is intensifying three decades, and especially under in China, but it is clear that the CCP’s the leadership of Xi Jinping, General ambitions do not stop at China’s borders. Secretary of the Chinese Communist The CCP’s global ambitions are evident in Party, amounted to a foreign policy several critical ways: miscalculation of historic proportions. The central error was the assumption that • The CCP aims to make the world as China would eventually liberalize, uphold a whole safe for authoritarianism. Xi and the rules-based international order, and the CCP have demonstrated this ambition cooperate with the democratic world in both word and deed, as a now as it accrued the benefits of capitalist overwhelming body of evidence amply economics. Rather than moderate its demonstrates. behavior at home and abroad, however, modern-day China has emerged as the • Accordingly, the PRC is intent on most powerful authoritarian state in undermining democracy abroad. While history and the major challenger to the the CCP continues to target democracies liberal world. such as the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Germany, India, Japan, and To help democracies move past these Australia, it is Hong Kong and Taiwan mistakes and rethink the challenge that stand on the frontline of the PRC’s that China poses around the world, global assault on democracy; their very Halifax International Security Forum existence as democracies now hangs (HFX) conducted in-depth interviews precariously in the balance. with more than 250 global experts and policy- and decision-makers between • The CCP’s global ambitions are February and October 2020. In addition, undergirded by what is fast becoming the exclusive polling for HFX by Ipsos Public world’s largest economy. In prosecuting A"airs suggests that, following Beijing’s these ambitions, the multi-trillion-dollar censorship of the outbreak of COVID-19, global infrastructure project known China’s favorability ratings among the as the One Belt One Road Initiative is global public, particularly in democracies, complemented by the use of major have plunged. Chinese companies like Huawei, which are beholden to the CCP’s interests and The key to understanding the nature of instructions. the China challenge is to recognize that Beijing’s worldview is guided, above • The CCP under Xi is committed to all else, by the interests of a Chinese technological authoritarianism at home Communist Party (CCP) that is Leninist to and abroad. China is aware of its current the core. Failure to internalize this central technological shortcomings. To overcome point will lead to misdiagnosing the them, the CCP has carefully thought-out 4 CHINA VS. DEMOCRACY: THE GREATEST GAME EXECUTIVE SUMMARY plans, which include cyber espionage and the continued theft of intellectual property. China intends to emerge as the dominant tech power in the twenty-first century.
Recommended publications
  • Celerino Castillo III, Dave Harmon
    Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the following people: Celerino Castillo III: My parents, Celerino and Angie Castillo, for teaching me what life is all about; my sisters, Diana, Melinda, and San Juanita for being there when I needed them; Brian Casey for pointing me to the right person; Chris Doyle for first discovering my story; Chief Raul Garza for teaching me what it takes to be the best; Juan Perez for guiding me against the Gestapo; Mike Levine for his endless encouragement; Rosa Granados for holding my hand for the past two years (some wounds are not visible); and all the undercover agents now being abused - "Nothing is forever" Dave Harmon: The proofreading squad, for their sharp eyes and vigorous encouragement: Laura E. Keeton, Dan and Diana Dworin, Jamie McIlvain, and Lisa DeCuir; the stalwart supporters: Steve Grey, Sonia Sellers, Jerry and Kale Clark, Darryl Pruett, Dave "Big Daddy" McLeod, Oscar and Tami Hinojosa, Avrel Seale, Beth Bryant, Rob Dennett, and Robert and Viola Garza; Dr. Henry Dietz of the University of Texas for pointers on recent Peruvian history; the Rio Grande Book Co. for letting me run amok on their office machines. And, most of all, Richard Derus for bringing it all together. FOREWORD by Michael Levine Now that you've read this far I advise you to cancel any appointments you may have scheduled during the next several hours. You are not going to be able to put this book down. It will mesmerize you, enrage you and change your attitude toward the people in government whom we have entrusted with our safety and security.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian-Georgian War: Implications for the Un and Collective Security
    OAKA Cilt:4, Sayı: 7, ss. 29-43, 2009 THE RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN WAR: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UN AND COLLECTIVE SECURITY RUSYA-GÜRCİSTAN SAVAŞI’NIN KOLLEKTİF GÜVENLİK VE BM ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ Roman MUZALEVSKY 1 ABSTRACT This paper examines UN’s involvement in Georgia following the dissolution of the Soviet Union and analyzes implications of the 2008 Russian-Georgian War for the international state system, the UN itself and collective security. It presents definitions of humanitarian intervention, self-defense, sovereignty and territorial integrity promoted by the UN as correct notions in theory but frequently conflicting concepts in practice. The war between Russia and Georgia, along with the cases of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, serves as a case study demonstrating the difficulties of regional dispute resolution when international principles conflict and geopolitics comes into play. The paper shows that the UN’s role in providing for international security after the Russian-Georgian war has been undermined and that there is a clear need for reforms within the UN, realignment of its vision, purposes, and especially principles. Better reconciling, legally and practically, the frequently exclusive conceptions of territorial integrity and self-determination, state sovereignty and humanitarian intervention is essential to help prevent or mitigate breaches of international law and collective security the UN positions but not quite serves as a sole guarantor of. Key Words: UN, Russia, Georgia, Security, International Law ÖZET Bu çalışma Sovyetlerin dağılmasını takiben Birleşmiş Milletler’in Gürcistan’a yönelik politikalarını incelemekte ve 2008 Rus-Gürcü Savaşı’nın uluslararası devlet sistemi, kollektif güvenlik ve Birleşmiş Milletler açısından etkilerini analiz etmektedir. Makale Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından desteklenen insancıl müdahale, meşru müdafaa, egemenlik ve bölgesel bütünleşme gibi kavramları teoride doğru ancak pratikte sık sık çatışan nosyonlar olarak değerlendirmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia
    Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson SILK ROAD PAPER January 2018 Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center American Foreign Policy Council, 509 C St NE, Washington D.C. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council and the Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of
    [Show full text]
  • UK-US Trade Relations
    House of Commons International Trade Committee UK-US Trade Relations Second Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 25 April 2018 HC 481 Published on 1 May 2018 by authority of the House of Commons International Trade Committee The International Trade Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for International Trade and its associated public bodies. Current membership Angus Brendan MacNeil MP (Scottish National Party, Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (Chair) Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Mr Marcus Fysh MP (Conservative, Yeovil) Mr Ranil Jayawardena MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Mr Chris Leslie MP (Labour (Co-op), Nottingham East) Emma Little Pengelly MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast South) Julia Lopez MP (Conservative, Hornchurch and Upminster) Stephanie Peacock MP (Labour, Barnsley East) Faisal Rashid MP (Labour, Warrington South) Catherine West MP (Labour, Hornsey and Wood Green) Matt Western MP (Labour, Warwick and Leamington) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this Report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Mariam Keating (Committee Assistant), Lydia Menzies (Clerk), George Perry (Media Officer), Dr Gabriel Siles-Brügge (ESRC IAA/POST Parliamentary Academic Fellow), David Turner (Committee Specialist), Luke Villiers (Committee Specialist), Andrew Wallace (Senior Committee Assistant), and Joanna Welham (Second Clerk).
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Biographies
    BIOGRAPHIES OF SPEAKERS 1 Prof. Osamu Arakaki Professor, International Christian University Tokyo, Japan Osamu Arakaki is a professor at International Christian University (ICU), Japan, and an expert of international law and international relations. He received a PhD in Law from Victoria University of WellinGton, New Zealand, and an MA in Political Science from the University of Toronto, Canada. Before he beGan servinG at ICU, he was a junior expert of the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). He was also a visitinG fellow at Harvard Law School, USA, visitinG associate professor at the University of Tokyo, Japan, and professor at Hiroshima City University, Japan. His main works include “East Asia: ReGional RefuGee ReGimes” (co-author) in Costello and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International RefuGee Law (Oxford University Press, forthcominG), “International Law ConcerninG Infectious Diseases: International Sanitary Conventions in the 1940s” in HoGakushirin, 118:2, (2020), Statelessness Conventions and Japanese Laws: Convergence and Divergence (UNHCR Representation in Japan, 2015) and RefuGee Law and Practice in Japan (AshGate, 2008). Source: https://acsee.iafor.org/dvteam/osamu-arakaki/ 2 Laurie Ashton Of Counsel, Keller Rohrback Phoenix, Arizona Laurie Ashton is Of Counsel to Keller Rohrback. Prior to becominG Of Counsel, she was a partner in the Arizona affiliate of Keller Rohrback. Early in her career, as an adjunct professor, she tauGht semester courses in LawyerinG Theory and Practice and Advanced Business Reorganizations. She also served as a law clerk for the Honorable Charles G. Case, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, for the District of Arizona for two years. An important part of Laurie’s international work involves the domestic and international leGal implications of treaty obliGations and breaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party Leaders and Officials Since 1975
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 07154, 6 February 2020 Conservative Party and Compiled by officials since 1975 Sarah Dobson This List notes Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975. Further reading Conservative Party website Conservative Party structure and organisation [pdf] Constitution of the Conservative Party: includes leadership election rules and procedures for selecting candidates. Oliver Letwin, Hearts and Minds: The Battle for the Conservative Party from Thatcher to the Present, Biteback, 2017 Tim Bale, The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron, Polity Press, 2016 Robert Blake, The Conservative Party from Peel to Major, Faber & Faber, 2011 Leadership elections The Commons Library briefing Leadership Elections: Conservative Party, 11 July 2016, looks at the current and previous rules for the election of the leader of the Conservative Party. Current state of the parties The current composition of the House of Commons and links to the websites of all the parties represented in the Commons can be found on the Parliament website: current state of the parties. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975 Leader start end Margaret Thatcher Feb 1975 Nov 1990 John Major Nov 1990 Jun 1997 William Hague Jun 1997 Sep 2001 Iain Duncan Smith Sep 2001 Nov 2003 Michael Howard Nov 2003 Dec 2005 David Cameron Dec 2005 Jul 2016 Theresa May Jul 2016 Jun 2019 Boris Johnson Jul 2019 present Deputy Leader # start end William Whitelaw Feb 1975 Aug 1991 Peter Lilley Jun 1998 Jun 1999 Michael Ancram Sep 2001 Dec 2005 George Osborne * Dec 2005 July 2016 William Hague * Dec 2009 May 2015 # There has not always been a deputy leader and it is often an official title of a senior Conservative politician.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Journal of International Law [Vol 21(1)
    Advance Copy REMEDYING THE LIMITATIONS OF THE CTBT? TESTING UNDER THE TREATY ON THE PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS Remedying the Limitations of the CTBT CHRISTOPHER P EVANS* Various limitations on the testing of nuclear weapons already exist within international law, including the Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapons Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water of 1963, along with further restrictions on where testing is permitted and the maximum yield of such tests. Yet it was not until 1996 that the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (‘CTBT’) was adopted, representing the first globally reaching prohibition of all forms of testing that result in a nuclear weapon ‘explosion’. The CTBT does not, however, cover subcritical and computer simulated nuclear tests, which can ensure the safety and reliability of existing stockpiles, thus undermining the CTBT’s implications for nuclear disarmament. More importantly, due to the onerous entry-into-force requirements under art XIV, the CTBT is not yet binding on states and is unlikely to become so in the near future. A further contribution to the legal restrictions on nuclear weapon testing has recently been provided by the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (‘TPNW’), which was adopted in July 2017. Under art 1(1)(a), states party undertake never, under any circumstances, to ‘develop’ or ‘test’ nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. Given the challenges facing the CTBT, this article seeks to analyse the extent of the testing prohibition established under art 1(1)(a) as well as the scope of the prohibition of development in order to determine whether the TPNW closes the testing ‘loophole’ established by the CTBT by including subcritical and computer simulated testing within either of these prohibitions.
    [Show full text]
  • A British Agenda for Europe Designing Our Own Future
    A B r i t i s h A g e n d a f o r E u r o p e : D e s i g n i n g o u r o w n f u t u r e A British Agenda for Europe Designing our own future A Chatham House Commission Report Chatham House, 10 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LE T: +44 (0)20 7957 5700 E: [email protected] www.chathamhouse.org.uk F: +44 (0)20 7957 5710 www.chathamhouse.org.uk Charity Registration Number: 208223 A British Agenda for Europe Designing Our Own Future The Chatham House Commission Report on Europe after Fifty: Policy Implications for Britain Chair: Sir Stephen Wall 1 www.chathamhouse.org.uk Chatham House has been the home of the Royal Institute of International Affairs for over eight decades. Our mission is to be a world-leading source of independent analysis, informed debate and influential ideas on how to build a prosperous and secure world for all. © Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2008 Chatham House (the Royal Institute of International Affairs) is an independent body which promotes the rigorous study of international questions and does not express opinion of its own. The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Business West Infographic Full
    Business West Many Faces. Many Successes. What would you like to see? Story Support Voice of Business West for business of business OUR AIM To make this the best place to: Live Learn Work Prosper WHO WE ARE We work with 20,000 businesses All sectors LARGE and all sizes MEDIUM SMALL 95% of corporates in our region are members OUR COMPANY A not-for-dividend We are Owned and governed by company non-political business community 225 £13m sta turnover We’re the largest Chamber of Commerce in the UK and established 1823 We’re award winning Enterprising Best Business Development Britain Award and Job Creation Project for Export 2017 Best job creation ICC project Best International Project European Sunday Times Enterprise Top 100 2018, Promotion 2017 & 2016 Awards Finalist OUR REACH In 2017 our media comments reached 10,000 followers 16.1m on LinkedIn 18,000 followers on Twitter What else would you like to see? Support Voice for business of business OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS WE HELPED create 4,400 JOBS 1,400 £650m 85,000 helped start-up, export sales from export documents scale-up and 700 exporters processed innovate WE DELIVER CONTRACTS FOR WE WORK WITH ‘Business West is hands down the best business support organisation I've worked with in the UK, delivering results where other regional services simply haven't.’ Robert Sugar, MD at Urban Hawk & Crocotta What else would you like to see? Story Voice of Business West of business OUR TRACK RECORD The driving force behind: Redevelopment of Creation of Cabot Supporting City Harbour Circus Gloucestershire 2050 Evolution of Switch Reducing train journey Influencing skills and on to Swindon times to London training in the region We created successful spin o organisations: OUR INFLUENCE For 200 years we’ve worked with diverse partners to create a region rich in culture, with equality and opportunity for all.
    [Show full text]
  • CDU/CSU): Vielen Dank, Liebe Kolleginnen Und Kollegen
    TOP 1 Auswärtiges Amt 111. Sitzung, 11. September 2019 Roderich Kiesewetter (CDU/CSU): Vielen Dank, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen. – Herr Präsident! Meine sehr geehrten Damen und Herren! Meinen Geburtstag habe ich seinerzeit 2001 tatsächlich in den USA verbracht und nicht so gute Erinnerungen daran. Danke, dass ich meinen Geburtstag heute in der Runde von Kolleginnen und Kollegen begehen darf. Viele von Ihnen haben heute die Besorgnis kundgetan, dass die internationale regelbasierte Ordnung unter Druck steht. Diese Besorgnis sollten wir wenden und es als unsere Aufgabe verstehen, als Aufgabe Deutschlands in Europa, als Aufgabe der Europäischen Union, uns sehr stark für den Erhalt und die Wiederherstellung der regelbasierten internationalen Ordnung einzusetzen – für Menschenrechte, Rechtsstaatlichkeit, freien Welthandel, aber auch für koordinierte Entwicklungszusammenarbeit –, und wir sollten unsere Kraft dafür einsetzen, dass die, die in den letzten Jahren davon abgewichen sind, auf den Pfad der regelbasierten Ordnung zurückgeführt werden. (Beifall bei der CDU/CSU und der SPD) Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, ich möchte das am Beispiel Russlands deutlich machen. Putin hat im Juli 2018 in London kurz vor dem G-20-Gipfel sehr deutlich gesagt, der Liberalismus sei abgenutzt. Lassen Sie uns das als Ermahnung begreifen. Aber er ist nicht abgenutzt; vielmehr müssen wir uns neu sortieren. Lassen Sie mich drei Herausforderungen ansprechen, mit denen uns Russland konfrontiert und über deren Umgang auch in diesem Hause keine Einigkeit erzielt werden kann. Die erste der drei Herausforderungen ist aus meiner Sicht der Mythos, dass Russland in einer Opferrolle sei, weil ost- und mitteleuropäische Staaten sich für NATO und EU entschieden haben. Dem sollten wir – und das ist die feste Auffassung der Union – gegenhalten.
    [Show full text]
  • China Task Force Report
    SEPTEMBER 2020 CHINA TASK FORCE REPORT CHAIRMAN MICHAEL McCAUL U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTEENTH CONGRESS TIMELINE: 40 YEARS OF U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS 1972 2015 President Richard Nixon visits the People’s Republic President Obama hosts Chairman Xi for a state visit, of China (PRC) in February and meets with Chairman where the PRC pledges they do “not intend to pursue Mao Zedong militarization” of the South China Sea 1979 2018 Then-President Jimmy Carter grants full diplomatic In response to IP theft and other harmful trade relations with the PRC practices, President Donald Trump begins to place taris on imports from the PRC. The PRC retaliates with taris of their own, kicking o a trade war 1984 President Ronald Reagan visits the PRC 2019 March: Hong Kongers begin to protest the Hong Kong 1989 extradition bill Tiananmen Square massacre May: U.S. Commerce Department places Huawei on its 1993 “Entity List,” restricting its access to U.S. technology Clinton launches what’s known as “constructive engagement” with the PRC November: In response to the brutal crackdown by the police, President Trump signs the Hong Kong Human 1996 Rights and Democracy Act The PRC attempts to influence the 1996 election through illegal campaign donations 2020 The CCP covers up the coronavirus outbreak, allowing 2000 the virus to turn into a pandemic U.S. and the PRC normalize trade relations and the PRC joins the World Trade Organization June 30th: The PRC passes a new national security law imposing severe punishments for anyone both inside 2008 and outside Hong Kong for encouraging democratic The PRC becomes the largest foreign holder of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2017 No. 178 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was firming President Trump’s outstanding GARDNER. When he introduced his called to order by the President pro nominations to the Federal courts. Al- former professor before the Judiciary tempore (Mr. HATCH). ready this week, we have confirmed Committee, Senator GARDNER noted f two strong, smart, and talented women how much she cared about ‘‘robust de- to serve on our Nation’s circuit courts. bates and hearing the views of others.’’ PRAYER Today we will consider two more well- ‘‘Justice Eid,’’ he said, ‘‘was open to The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- qualified nominees: Allison Eid and their views, engaging with them, and fered the following prayer: Stephanos Bibas. [was] never biased against different Let us pray. First, we will confirm Allison Eid, perspectives.’’ Eternal King, You are great and mar- whom the President has nominated to Later, Justice Eid was appointed to velous. Without Your wondrous deeds, serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for serve as Colorado’s solicitor general our lawmakers, our Nation, and our the Tenth Circuit. Justice Eid has big and, in 2006, to the Colorado Supreme planet could not survive. Lord, let the shoes to fill in taking that seat—it be- Court. Two years later, 75 percent of nations You have made acknowledge came vacant when Neil Gorsuch as- Coloradans voted to retain her.
    [Show full text]