DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the European Commission's Co-Operation With

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the European Commission's Co-Operation With Evaluation of the European Commission’s Co-operation with Thailand Final Report Volume 2 October 2009 Evaluation for the European Commission This evaluation was commissioned by: Italy the Evaluation Unit common to: Aide à la Décision Economique Belgium EuropeAid Co-operation Office, Directorate-General for Development and PARTICIP GmbH Germany Directorate-General for External Relations Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik Germany Overseas Development Institute United Kingdom European Institute for Asian Studies Belgium Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales Spain The evaluation was carried out by Particip GmbH within a consortium led by DRN. The external evaluation team was composed of Max Hennion (team leader), Jörn Dosch, Steven Ney, Florence Burban, Claudio Schuftan, René Madrid, Christopher Veit, Marcel Goeke, Tino Smaïl. Particip GmbH was the evaluation contract manager. The evaluation was managed by the evaluation unit who also chaired the reference group composed by members of the services (EuropeAid, DG Dev, DG Relex), the EC Delegations to Thailand and representatives of the Royal Thai Embassy in Brussels. Full reports of the evaluation can be obtained from the evaluation unit website: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/evaluation/evaluation_reports/index_en.htm The opinions expressed in this document represent the authors’ points of view, which are not necessarily shared by the European Commission or by the authorities of the countries concerned. Evaluation of European Commission’s Cooperation with Thailand Country Level Evaluation Final Report The report consists of 2 volumes: Volume I: FINAL report Volume II: Annexes VOLUME I: FINAL REPORT 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Background 4. Findings 5. Conclusions 6. Recommendations VOLUME II: ANNEXES 1. Field mission information collection plan 2. List of people met 3. List of documents consulted 4. Information Matrix 5. List of EC projects TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNEX I: FIELD MISSION INFORMATION COLLECTION PLAN..................................................1 ANNEX II: LIST OF PEOPLE MET....................................................................................................9 ANNEX III: LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONSULTED .........................................................................11 ANNEX IV: INFORMATION MATRIX ............................................................................................20 ANNEX V: LIST OF EC PROJECTS ...............................................................................................142 Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with Thailand DRN-ADE-PARTICIP-DIE-ODI-EIAS- ICEI ANNEX I: FIELD MISSION INFORMATION COLLECTION PLAN The field phase is designed to generate additional evidence which can be used to fill gaps in the preliminary findings above, as well as test and probe whether the preliminary findings and conclusions based on them are sound. In the case of Thailand, a relatively large number of project final evaluations and Mid-term Reviews are already available, many of which involved substantial collection and analysis of statistical data and the use of focus groups at the level of beneficiaries. This information has already, for the most part, been incorporated into the Desk Report although one aspect of the field mission will, of course, be the search for additional documentation. In this Country Strategy Evaluation, therefore, the main tool applied in the field will be the semi- structured interview, either at the level of the EC Delegation, Government, or the project (see following chart). In order to give a framework for these interviews, a set of working hypotheses to be probed has been constructed (see pages following). A combination of Bangkok and province / district-based interviews are planned, covering EC Delegation officials in Bangkok, in Government ministries, at the level of Provincial government, in districts were projects have been implemented, in various bilateral and multilateral partner offices, and in project units (see pages following). Because of the limited number of field days available, provincial interviews will be carried out in one province, to be identified with the Delegation. Final Report October 2009 Page 1 Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with Thailand DRN-ADE-PARTICIP-DIE-ODI-EIAS- ICEI Sources and respondents Project Bene‐ MSs & EC Delegation Ministries NSAs management ficiaries donors 1 To what extent have the Commission's interventions contributed to improved trade and main economic partnership with the country? 2 To what extent have the Commission's interventions in the sector of higher education main contributed to increase mutual understanding and awareness? 3 To what extent have the Commission's interventions in the sector of public health and health main services contributed to the universal health care coverage? 4 To what extent were the EC programmes in the country consistent with the global objectives of EC response to global challenges main faced by ASEAN, particularly environment issues? 5 To what extent has EC mainstreaming of gender, governance and human rights into main its cooperation programmes resulted in enhanced governance in the country? 6 To what extent did the EC assessed and considered (i) the government’s priorities, (ii) the needs of the country and, (iii) the evolving context main in programming its strategic response, including the follow-up of the implementation strategy? 7 To what extent did the combination of instruments, approaches, financing modalities and/or channels main of disbursement used by the EC contributed to achieve EC aid objectives? 8 To what extent has the EC coordinated and cooperated with EU Member states and IFIs intending to main improve the complementarity of their interventions? 9 To what extent did the EC approach result in progress toward a balanced economic partnership between Thailand and the EU that would not main have occurred absent EC co- operation programmes? Final Report October 2009 Page 2 Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with Thailand DRN-ADE-PARTICIP-DIE-ODI-EIAS- ICEI Projects proposed for analysis Case studies in bold. 1 To what extent have the Commission's Small Projects Facility, ECAP, TREATY, interventions contributed to improved trade and economic partnership with the country? 2 To what extent have the Commission's AsiaLink, AUNP, FWP (particularly the INCO programmes), Erasmus interventions in the sector of higher education Mundus contributed to increase mutual understanding and awareness? 3 To what extent have the Commission's HlthCareRefProj(HCRP641);Wom+ChCare+SuppHighHIVPrev(815);M interventions in the sector of public health and igrHlthProj(912);ThaiVillHlthProjMSariang(612); health services contributed to the universal ComprCare+SuppPersons HIV+families(2320). health care coverage? 4 To what extent were the EC programmes in the COGEN, EAEF, ProEco projects (EcoToursim), CHARM, Asia Urbs country consistent with the global objectives of EC response to global challenges faced by ASEAN, particularly environment issues? 5 To what extent has EC mainstreaming of gender, All major programmes/projects + CCIs oriented ones governance and human rights into its cooperation (refugees/governance) programmes resulted in enhanced governance in the country? 6 To what extent did the EC assessed and All major programmes/projects such as SPF, Health Care Reform, considered (i) the government’s priorities, (ii) the etc.. needs of the country and, (iii) the evolving context in programming its strategic response, including the follow-up of the implementation strategy? 7 To what extent did the combination of All major programmes/projects such as SPF, Health Care Reform, instruments, approaches, financing modalities etc.. and/or channels of disbursement used by the EC contributed to achieve EC aid objectives? 8 To what extent has the EC coordinated and All major programmes/projects such as SPF, Health Care Reform, cooperated with EU Member states and IFIs etc.. intending to improve the complementarity of their interventions? 9 To what extent did the EC approach result in Trade policy dialogue, SPF progress toward a balanced economic partnership between Thailand and the EU that would not have occurred absent EC co-operation programmes? Hypothesis to be checked 1 To what extent have the Commission's interventions contributed to improved trade and economic partnership with the country? • The favourable trade regime had been negotiated in Brussels and are not the direct result of the EC’s cooperation programme; • Individual SPF projects had a specific impact on trade relations; • EC interventions and the Delegation contribute to achieving effective policy/legislative responses by the RTG; Final Report October 2009 Page 3 Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with Thailand DRN-ADE-PARTICIP-DIE-ODI-EIAS- ICEI • The most significant push for Europe’s visibility has been Thailand’s ASEM membership (and the pro-active role that Thailand has played in the forum); • There are no specific programmes with an explicit focus on the promotion of European FDI and improvement of investment conditions. 2 To what extent have the Commission's interventions in the sector of higher education contributed to increase mutual understanding and awareness? • EC interventions have been successful in constructing functional and effective institutional vehicles of exposure and interaction; • these programmes are administered in small doses with beneficial effects
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic Districts For
    Historic Districts for All - India a social and human approach for sustainable revitalisation Historic Districts for All - India a social and human approach for sustainable revitalisation Manual for City Professionals March 2010 Historic Districts for All - India a social and human approach for sustainable revitalisation Manual for City Professionals March 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The authors are responsible for the choice and the presenta- tion of the facts contained in this book and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the written permission of UNESCO. Any communication concerning this publication may be addressed to: Marina Faetanini Social and Human Sciences UNESCO New Delhi Office B-5/29 Safdarjung Enclave New Delhi 110029, India Tel: +91 11 26713000 Fax: +91 11 267 13001, 13002 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Website: www.unesco.org/newdelhi Any request for permission to reproduce or translate any material in the work should be directed to: UNESCO Publishing Email: [email protected] Website: http://publishing.unesco.org Edited by: Marina Faetanini Cover and page layout: Saurabh Tewari Printed by: Colorcom Advertising Photography ©UNESCO/M. Faetanini, ©UNESCO/M. Hainry, ©UNESCO/L.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the European Union's Regional Co-Operation With
    Evaluation of the European Union’s regional co-operation with Asia Final Report Volume 2 March 2014 ___________ Evaluation carried out on behalf of the European Commission DevelopmentDevelopment andand Cooperation Cooperation EuropeAidEuropeAid Consortium composed by DRN, ECDPM, Ecorys, Particip Leader of the Consortium: DRN mail@drn­network.com Contract No EVA 2011/Lot 4 Specific contract No 2012/305114 This evaluation was commissioned by the Evaluation Unit of the Directorate General for Development and Cooperation – EuropeAid (European Commission) The opinions expressed in this document represent the authors’ points of view which are not necessarily shared by the European Commission or by the authorities of the concerned countries. This report has been prepared by Merzhauser Str. 183 79100 Freiburg, Germany Phone: +49 761 790 740 Fax: +49 761 790 7490 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.particip.de The evaluation team consisted of Jörn Dosch (Team Leader), Landis MacKellar, Jan Douwe Meindertsma, Steven Ney (senior evaluation experts), Chhaya Jha and Jatswan Singh (senior thematic experts). The team has been supported by: Georg Ladj (QA director), Christopher Dent (expert on Asia political economy), Virorth Doung, Natthanan Kunnamas, Vu Ngoc Uyen, Win Win Kyi (country specific experts), Julia Schwarz and Sarah Seus (project manager), Daniel Claus and Meike Pollakowski (supporting expert). The author accepts sole responsibility for this report, drawn up on behalf of the Commission of the European Union. The report does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission. Cover Picture sources: SWITCH Asia, FLEGT Asia, EuropeAid Multimedia Library, Jörn Dosch & Jan Douwe Meindertsma Evaluation of the European Union’s regional co-operation with Asia Final Report The report consists of 3 volumes: Volume I: Main report Volume II: Detailed information matrix Volume III: Annexes VOLUME I: MAIN REPORT 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation for the European Commission
    EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S CO-OPERATION AND PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA COUNTRY LEVEL EVALUATION Final Synthesis Report April 2007 Evaluation for the European Commission This evaluation is commissioned by: the Evaluation Unit common to: EuropeAid Co-operation Office, Directorate General for Development and External Relations Directorate-General This evaluation is carried out by: EGEval II EEIG Landis MacKellar was the team leader (and covering the trade sector), Markus Taube (trade and economic and social reform - graphs and data provided by THINK!DESK), Carsten Hüttche (environment), Serani Siegel and Liu Kaiming (governance, human rights and rule of law). The evaluation is managed by the evaluation unit who also chaired the reference group composed by members of the services (EuropeAid, DG Relex, DG Trade, Environment and ECOFIN and the EC Delegation in China) and the Embassy of China in Belgium The opinions expressed in this document represent the authors’ points of view which are not necessarily shared by the European Commission or by the authorities of the countries concerned. Any enquiries about this evaluation should be addressed to: European Commission/ EuropeAid/ Evaluation Unit Rue de la Loi, 41, Office: 03/83, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium, Email: [email protected] Full reports can be obtained from the evaluation unit website: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/evaluation/eval_reports/country_region.htm Evaluation of EC Cooperation & Partnership with China, Final Synthesis Report Acknowledgements: The evaluation of the EC's engagement with a large country at a particularly dynamic stage of its development, and of its evolving relationship to Europe is challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • ASIA UR%S Programme
    (8523($1&200,66,21 $6,$85%63URJUDPPH *XLGHOLQHVIRU$SSOLFDQWV (&EXGJHWOLQH% $VLD8UEV3URJUDPPH *XLGHOLQHVIRU$SSOLFDQWV 7$%/(2)&217(176 1 The Asia Urbs Programme...........................................................................................................3 1.1 Objectives of the programme and priority issues for 2000 ......................................................3 1.2 Size of financial support by the European Community ...........................................................3 2 Rules concerning the present Call for proposals..........................................................................4 2.1 criteria for eligibility ................................................................................................................4 2.1.1 Eligibility of applicants: who may apply .........................................................................4 2.1.2 Partnership and eligibility of partners .................................................................................5 2.1.3 Eligibility of projects: projects for which an application may be made...........................5 Size of Projects.........................................................................................................................5 Geographical areas ...................................................................................................................6 Type of activities......................................................................................................................6 Ineligible types of activities
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the European Commission's Co
    Evaluation of the European Commission’s Co-operation with Thailand Final Report Volume 1 October 2009 Evaluation for the European Commission This evaluation was commissioned by: Italy the Evaluation Unit common to: Aide à la Décision Economi- que Belgium EuropeAid Co-operation Office, Directorate-General for Development and PARTICIP GmbH Germany Directorate-General for External Relations Deutsches Institut für Ent- wicklungspolitik Germany Overseas Development Insti- tute United Kingdom European Institute for Asian Studies Belgium Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales Spain The evaluation was carried out by Particip GmbH within a consortium led by DRN. The external evaluation team was composed of Max Hennion (team leader), Jörn Dosch, Steven Ney, Florence Burban, Claudio Schuftan, René Madrid, Christopher Veit, Marcel Goeke and Tino Smaïl. Particip GmbH was the evaluation contract manager. The evaluation was managed by the evaluation unit who also chaired the reference group composed by members of the services (EuropeAid, DG Dev, DG Relex), the EC Delegations to Thailand and representatives of the Royal Thai Embassy in Brussels. Full reports of the evaluation can be obtained from the evaluation unit website: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/evaluation/evaluation_reports/index_en.htm The opinions expressed in this document represent the authors’ points of view, which are not necessarily shared by the European Commission or by the authorities of the countries concerned. Evaluation of European Commission’s Cooperation with Thailand Country Level Evaluation Final Report The report consists of 2 volumes: Volume I: FINAL report Volume II: Annexes VOLUME I: FINAL REPORT 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Background 4. Findings 5. Conclusions 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanization and Sustainability in Asia
    Urbanization and Sustainability in Asia AADB_Prelims_i-xvi.inddDB_Prelims_i-xvi.indd i 111/22/20061/22/2006 112:28:462:28:46 PPMM AADB_Prelims_i-xvi.inddDB_Prelims_i-xvi.indd iiii 111/22/20061/22/2006 112:28:492:28:49 PPMM Urbanization and Sustainability in Asia Case Studies of Good Practice Edited by Brian Roberts and Trevor Kanaley AADB_Prelims_i-xvi.inddDB_Prelims_i-xvi.indd iiiiii 111/22/20061/22/2006 112:28:492:28:49 PPMM © 2006 Asian Development Bank All rights reserved. Published 2006. Printed in the Philippines. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Available Publication Stock No. 051206 Asian Development Bank Case studies on urban development 1. Asian Development Bank. 2. Urban development. The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not neces- sarilyreflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. The Asian Development Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data in- cluded in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence oftheir use. Use of the term „country‰ does not imply any judgment by the authors or the Asian Development Bank as to the legal or other status of any territorial entity. AADB_Prelims_i-xvi.inddDB_Prelims_i-xvi.indd iivv 111/22/20061/22/2006 112:28:502:28:50 PPMM Table of Contents 1. Overview . 1 Urbanization and Sustainable Development . 1 Good Practice Approaches to Urban Development . 5 Framework for Analyzing Good Practice in Asia . 6 Global Good Practice Case Studies . 8 Conclusion . 8 2. Urbanization and Sustainabilityin Asia . 13 The Scale and Scope of Urbanization .
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing a Euro-Asia Network in Design and Manufacture Through Eu Projects
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, ICED’07 28 - 31 AUGUST 2007, CITE DES SCIENCES ET DE L'INDUSTRIE, PARIS, FRANCE ESTABLISHING A EURO-ASIA NETWORK IN DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE THROUGH EU PROJECTS Xincai Tan1, Xiu-Tian Yan1, Benoit Eynard2, Chengyu Jiang3， Neal P Juster1 ， and William J Ion1 1Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management, James Weir Building, University of Strathclyde, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Technology Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie - BP2060, 10010 Troyes Cedex – France 3Northwestern Polytechnical University, Youyi Xi Lu, Xian, - China Tel: +44141 548 2852, Fax: +44141 552 0557, Email: [email protected]. ABSTRACT In an era of rapid economic growth and industrial development in developing countries in Asia, engineering education systems in these countries are under increasing pressure to meet the demands of the local labour markets. At the same time there is a lack of interest from students in engineering in Europe. With support from the Asia-Link Programme of European Commission, three projects on engineering design and manufacture, led by the University of Strathclyde, have been undertaken by eleven Institutions in nine countries in both Europe and Asia. These projects aim at establishing a European and Asian (EUROASIA) network in engineering design and manufacture, contributing to the demands of today’s multinational engineering industries, and promoting local development through engineering education for both Asia and Europe. One project has been successfully completed, and the other two projects are still ongoing. Overall, this network in engineering design and manufacture has been successfully built up; the proposed deliverables and achievements have been made; and the impact in the engineering sectors of Asian partner countries is positive and remarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia URBS Programme — Call for Proposals for Projects Co-Financed by the European Commission (EC) — 1B/AMS/328
    22.9.98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 293/15 Asia URBS programme — Call for proposals for projects co-financed by the European Commission (EC) — 1B/AMS/328 (98/C 293/08) 1.ÙIntroduction and objectives of the Asia URBS (h) to ensure the visibility and the dissemination of the programme programme’s achievements. The EU Asia URBS programme was approved by the Commission in December 1995. 2.ÙEligible countries The programme is a new framework for decentralised Eligible countries in Asia are: Bangladesh, Bhutan, cooperation between Europe and Asia. Its broad Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Lao objective is to promote partnerships between local People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Maldives, governments and communities in Europe and in South Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, and South-East Asia. Thailand and Vietnam. Decentralised cooperation is seen as a way to strengthen All the European Union Member States are eligible. local government’s capacity in an era of globalisation and fiscal constraints. It is now increasingly recognised that cities and towns, local governments and other insti- 3.ÙParticipants tutions have a major potential contribution to make to international programmes of development cooperation through decentralised channels. The core of the programme focuses on direct coop- eration between local governments in Europe and in Asia in close partnership. Local governments from the 15 This programme arrives at a time when the relationships European Union countries and from the 16 eligible Asian between Asia and Europe are growing in volume and countries, with a legal status in their respective countries, quality, and has the following objectives: are the appropriate bodies to prepare project proposals, make financial requests and implement the related activities.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Indicative Programme
    THE NATIONAL INDICATIVE PROGRAMME 2005-2006 VIETNAM Country/Region: Vietnam Budget Years: 2005-2006 Budget Lines: 1910 Legal Base: ALA Regulation (Council Regulation (EEC) 443/92 of 25/02/1992) Cost of Order: NIP 2005 – 2006: € 34 million Programming Service: DG Relex H5 Head of Unit: Pierre Amilhat Co-ordinator: Renate Hahlen 1 Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................3 1. PREAMBLE .............................................................................................................................................................4 1.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................4 1.1.1 THE ALA REGULATION ..............................................................................................................................4 1.1.2 THE COUNTRY STRATEGY PAPER (CSP) 2002 - 2006 .................................................................................4 1.1.3 EC-VIETNAM REGIONAL COOPERATION AND SUPPORT THROUGH THEMATIC BUDGET LINES ............................4 1.1.4 THE POLICY FRAMEWORK: THE EUROPE-ASIA STRATEGY (2001) AND THE NEW PARTNERSHIP WITH SOUTH EAST ASIA (2003)..................................................................................................................................................4 1.1.5 THE NIP 2002 - 2004..................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for Environmental Project Funding
    Handbook for Environmental Project Funding i funding_handbook CONTENTS PREFACE IV Acknowledgement v Legal Notice v Contacts v Useful Links v INTRODUCTION 1 Information on the European Union 1 Who should read this Handbook 1 Purpose and Objectives 1 Background 2 Structure of the Handbook 3 ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRATION 5 Introduction 5 Cohesion Fund 7 European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) 8 European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) 9 European Social Fund 10 Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance 11 Innovative Actions 12 INTERREG III 13 LEADER + 15 URBAN II 16 CORE ENVIRONMENTAL FINANCING 18 Environment Funding from the European Union 18 Civil Protection Assistance Interventions 19 Community Action Programme in the Field of Civil Protection 20 Environmental Awareness 21 Financial Support for European ENVIROnMENTAL Organisations 22 General Call for Environmental Proposals 23 LIFE III (LIFE- Nature, LIFE- Environment and LIFE- Third countries) 24 Marine Pollution 26 Sustainable Urban Development 27 ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNAL FINANCING 28 ii funding_handbook Introduction 28 Asia Pro Eco 29 Asia Urbs 31 Border Regions – Pilot Projects 33 Co-financing with NGOs 36 Environment in Developing Countries 37 ISPA 39 MEDA II 41 PHARE 43 SAPARD 44 SMAP 45 TACIS 47 Tropical Forest Management 48 URB-AL- Local Urban Development in Latin America 50 ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH FINANCING 52 The 6th RTD Framework Programme 53 ENVIRONMENTAL FINANCING THROUGH EDUCATION, VOCATIONAL TRAINING, CULTURAL AND YOUTH PROGRAMMES 55 Culture 2000 56 Leonardo da Vinci 58 Socrates 60 Youth 62 LOAN FINANCING BY THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK AND EUROPEAN INVESTMENT FUND 64 European Investment Bank 64 SME Guarantee Facility 66 List of Figures Figure 1 - Local stakeholders get involved 2 Figure 2 - Format of information 3 Figure 3 - The Structural Funds and Rural Development 6 iii funding_handbook PREFACE Over 2 years have past since the publication of the White Paper on European Governance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Follow-Up Study on Integrated Master Plan for Sustainable Development of Siem Reap City in the Kingdom of Cambodia
    Siem Reap Provincial Government Kingdom of Cambodia The Follow-up Study on Integrated Master Plan for Sustainable Development of Siem Reap City in the Kingdom of Cambodia Final Report June 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY PACET CORPORATION NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. For the Currency Conversion, in case necessary, Exchange rate in May 2010 is applied: 1 KHR = 0.022 JPY 1 USD = 94.06 JPY PREFACE In response to a request from the Royal Government of Cambodia, the Government of Japan decided to conduct “The Study on Integrated Master Plan for Sustainable Development of Siem Reap/Angkor Town in the Kingdom of Cambodia” and entrusted the Study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). The Study was completed in March 2006. As a follow-up cooperation of the above mentioned study, JICA conducted the Follow-up Study on Integrated Master Plan for Sustainable Development of Siem Reap City in the Kingdom of Cambodia. JICA sent a study team headed by Mr. Kanao ITOH of PACET Corp. to Cambodia from February 2010 to May 2010. The team held discussions with the officials concerned in the Royal Government of Cambodia, and conducted field surveys in the study area. Upon returning to Japan, the team conducted further studies and prepared this final report. I hope that this report will contribute to sustainable development of Siem Reap City and to the enhancement of friendly relationship between our two countries. Finally, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials of the Government and those concerned in Cambodia for the close cooperation they have extended to the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia-Invest Programme Introduction
    Building partnerships between EU & Asian companies The European Union’s Asia-Invest Programme 1 Introduction • Asia-Invest is a European Commission regional co- operation initiative with Asia • Aims to strengthen mutual trade and investment flows between the EU and Asia • Is market-driven, providing financial support to business intermediary organisations for high-quality projects submitted under a range of co-financing activities. These organisations include: – Chambers of Commerce – Sector-specific trade and industrial associations – Agencies promoting trade and investment – Business and professional associations – Technology, management, standards and quality institutes2 1 Regional co-operation Eligible countries Asia: Afghanistan EU: Bangladesh Austria Bhutan Belgium Cambodia Denmark China Finland East Timor France India Germany Indonesia Greece Lao PDR Ireland Malaysia Italy Maldives Luxembourg Nepal Netherlands Pakistan Portugal Philippines Spain Sri Lanka Sweden Thailand United Kingdom Vietnam 3 Asia-Invest II Instruments Call for Proposals Match-making Private sector Institutional activities development capacity building Asia Venture Asia-Invest Asia-Interprise Asia-Invest Alliance Technical Assistance Asia-Partenariat Separate Award Procedure Asia-Invest Forum Asia Investment & Trade Facilitation Studies 4 2 Asia-Interprise Business match-making • Medium-scale business to business encounters organised in the EU or Asia, around one or several sectors • Involving at least 30 hosting companies and 20 visiting companies in one or
    [Show full text]