DOCSLIB.ORG

60 Geoffrey Scott, 1914

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
60 Geoffrey Scott, 1914 Geoffrey Scott, 1914. 60 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/1526381041165494 by guest on 27 September 2021 Geoffrey Scott and the Dream-Life of Architecture MARK CAMPBELL When the English aesthete Geoffrey Scott sat down in the spring of 1918 to continue the “history of taste” he had begun four years earlier with the Architecture of Humanism, he was struck by a frustratingly sudden attack of writer’s block. The severity of this attack was even more pronounced given his long-standing plans to add to this history; yet in spite of his initial enthu- siasm, Scott’s daughter-in-law, the writer Iris Origo, vividly remembered the scene in his study, where a large piece of foolscap . lay for many weeks upon the centre of his desk, bearing, in his fine scholar’s hand, the following words, and these only: A HISTORY OF TASTE Volume I Chapter I “It is very difficult . .”1 Origo was alluding not only to Scott’s difficulty with writing, however, but to the gravity of his “black moods,” which left him “incapable of doing any work” and would ultimately result in his complete nervous breakdown later that year.2 Following his doctor’s concerned advice, Scott traveled to Switzerland, where he was treated in the Lausanne clinic of Dr. Roger Vittoz (1863–1925), one of the preeminent psychologists of the period and the author of the mag- isterial Treatment of Neurasthenia by Teaching of Brain Control.3 With a perfunctory sweep of his hand, Vittoz proclaimed Scott a neurasthenic, his much-preferred diagnosis, and prescribed a lengthy course of treatment. This regime, another famous patient noted, was “a system of mental control and concentration,” in which Vittoz advocated “the habit of eliminating unnec- essary thoughts and worries from one’s mind [by] practic[ing] eliminating letters from words, or one number from a set of numbers.”4 Although it is impossible to know how closely Scott followed this regime—given that the second volume of his history ended where it had begun, with the taunting ellipsis that followed the phrase “It is very difficult . .”—it can be suggested that he was more than adept in the elimination of letters from words and had progressed to the subtraction of words from sentences and, perhaps, even Grey Room 15, Spring 2004, pp. 60–79. © 2004 Grey Room, Inc. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology 61 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/1526381041165494 by guest on 27 September 2021 the erasure of ideas from arguments. Like his “incapacity to do anything,” however, Scott’s writer’s block was more selective than it was all-consuming. And it was during these days recu- perating in the Swiss air that he worked on the poems he would publish as A Box of Paints in 1924 and Poems in 1932.5 In a strange coincidence, Vittoz’s treatment seems to have been especially conducive to writing poetry, as the experience of yet another patient, T.S. Eliot confirms. Following his own nervous collapse in 1921, Eliot sought refuge in Lausanne. His treatment successfully cured his writer’s block, and when he returned to London the following year, he carried with him the by-product of his stay: the first complete draft of The Waste Land.6 Together with their love of verse, it seems that Scott and Eliot shared an appreciation of Vittoz’s treatment with a tempered understanding of the consequences implicit in Eliot’s immortal line, “My nerves are bad to-night. Yes, bad.”7 But the question here is what form did Scott’s nerves take? Or—to be more precise—what influence did his famously fragile nerves have over his argu- ment in the Architecture of Humanism and its description, following a con- temporaneous notion of aesthetic empathy, of how architectural inhabitants projected their emotions on the walls that enclosed them? Again, this is a question that can be addressed through another line of Eliot’s poetry, one that foreshadowed the complications that lay behind Scott’s account of the inhabitation of space. Although Scott described this process in the Architecture of Humanism in consciously positivistic terms, noting that it was an exchange that was “true and reliable,” his own immedi- ate experience suggested that these correspondences were decidedly more nuanced and uncertain than he had allowed. “As Eliot had written of such an ambivalence in 1911, these were physical states that were projected . as if a magic lantern threw the nerves in patterns on a screen.”8 For Scott, this screen was not only the interior surfaces of architecture but the blank expanses of the page that followed after his frustrating ellipsis. And the diaphanous pat- terns that his nerves cast were composed not only of his sensory perceptions of architecture but of his image of architectural history. While Eliot’s self- awareness of his nerves resulted in some of the masterpieces of modernism, Scott’s nervousness consoled itself with his turn to an anachronism of the nineteenth-century: aesthetic connoisseurship. Within this turn, however, Scott’s promotion of an architecture that would “construct, within the world as it is, a pattern of the world,”9 and his theorization of the inhabitation of space, would be complicated by that least diagnostically convincing of dis- eases, neurasthenia. As he outlined his project in 1914, Scott explained that his original intention 62 Grey Room 15 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/1526381041165494 by guest on 27 September 2021 to “formulate the principles of classical [architectural] design” had been thwarted by the “present state of thought.” “While there may be a lack of architectural taste,” he bemoaned, “there is, unfortunately, no lack of archi- tectural opinion.”10 Scott felt that the Victorian era’s eclectic “revivals” had perverted “architectural taste,” and he further argued that a series of critical misconceptions—which he famously labeled as the “romantic, ethical, tech- nical, and biological fallacies”—had unduly confused “architectural thought.”11 In the first—“destructive”—part of the Architecture of Humanism, he sought to disprove these fallacies and argue for a return to classical architectural principles, as they were expressed in such works as his own luxurious house, the Villa Medici by Giuliano da Sangallo (constructed 1458–1461). However, Scott did not simply base his argument for this return on a promotion of the Renaissance as a “style,” although he certainly advocated that, but on a new form of criticism that considered the inhabitant’s spatial “reaction” to archi- tecture, a form that allowed him to argue that Renaissance works provided the highest “satisfaction of aesthetic delight.”12 In the book’s second—“constructive”—part, Scott explained how this “sat- isfaction” took place through a “psychological” investment in architecture: a “humanization” that he believed could restore “taste.” Scott imagined that the inhabitants wrote themselves into architectural space, and in this way he argued that architecture became a sort of biographic composite of their emo- tional states. While his conception of this process suggested that architecture reaffirmed biographic existence, his explanation of it assumed that architec- ture remained subservient to its subjective aestheticism (in the sense that it was a product of this process), and his historical idealization of the Renaissance collapsed its three-dimensional object into his pictorial memory. As Scott’s friend the English writer Vernon Lee had written of such an aesthetic sensi- bility, what mattered was not a concern with the “actual thing,” in all its three-dimensional complexity, but rather a “contemplation of the Aspect,” an idolization of the two-dimensional image.13 In this way Scott’s ideals were commensurate with the aestheticism of his mentor and erstwhile employer, the American art connoisseur Bernard Berenson, as well as with the ideals of an expatiate Anglo-American society whose members lived in turn-of-the-century Florence and celebrated the Renaissance as the epitome of artistic creation. Scott worked as Berenson’s private secretary from 1908 to 1912 while he labored on the Architecture of Humanism, and, as several critics have noted, he was heavily influenced by Berenson’s examination of the art-work from “the point of view of the aesthetic spectator.”14 Giuliano da Sangallo. Villa Medici, 1458–1461. Campbell | Geoffrey Scott and the Dream-Life of Architecture 63 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/1526381041165494 by guest on 27 September 2021 Of course, this viewpoint was synonymous with that of the connoisseur, and such an appreciation of architecture, like Berenson’s delectation of art, was as invested with connoisseurial ambition as it was infused with “human- ist” sentiment. Interestingly, Berenson’s own conflation of the humanist with the aesthetic is particularly evident in his only meditation on architecture, “A Word for Renaissance Churches,” written in 1893 and published in 1902. As he described the church of Santa Maria della Consolazione at Todi, Berenson noted that he found it almost inconceivable that “the purpose of the building was other than the realization of a beautiful dream of space. It suggests no ulterior motive . Such a buildings sings not to the glory of God, but the Godhead of man.”15 (Or, it can be suggested, praised the Godhead of Berenson.) Although Berenson preferred to take his humanism in Renaissance paintings, his influence over Scott suggests that the Architecture of Humanism can be productively considered as Scott’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mary Lago Collection Scope and Content Note
    Special Collections 401 Ellis Library Columbia, MO 65201 (573) 882-0076 & Rare Books [email protected] University of Missouri Libraries http://library.missouri.edu/specialcollections/ Mary Lago Collection Scope and Content Note The massive correspondence of E. M. Forster, which Professor Lago gathered from archives all over the world, is one of the prominent features of the collection, with over 15,000 letters. It was assembled in preparation for an edition of selected letters that she edited in collaboration with P. N. Furbank, Forster’s authorized biographer. A similar archive of Forster letters has been deposited in King’s College. The collection also includes copies of the correspondence of William Rothenstein, Edward John Thompson, Max Beerbohm, Rabindranath Tagore, Edward Burne-Jones, D.S. MacColl, Christiana Herringham, and Arthur Henry Fox-Strangways. These materials were also gathered by her in preparation for subsequent books. In addition, the collection contains Lago’s extensive personal and professional correspondence, including correspondence with Buddhadeva Bose, Penelope Fitzgerald, P.N. Furbank, Dilys Hamlett, Krishna Kripalani, Celia Rooke, Stella Rhys, Satyajit Ray, Amitendranath Tagore, E.P. Thompson, Lance Thirkell, Pratima Tagore, John Rothenstein and his family, Eric and Nancy Crozier, Michael Holroyd, Margaret Drabble, Santha Rama Rau, Hsiao Ch’ien, Ted Uppmann, Edith Weiss-Mann, Arthur Mendel, Zia Moyheddin and numerous others. The collection is supplemented by extensive files related to each of her books, proof copies of these books, and files related to her academic career, honors, awards, and memorabilia. Personal material includes her journals and diaries that depict the tenuous position of a woman in the male-dominated profession of the early seventies.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Barbara Strachey and Jayne Samuels, Eds., Mary Berenson, a Self-Portrait from Her Lett
    Reviews Mariechen's self-knowledge by Andrew Brink Mary Berenson, A Self-Portrait from her Letters & Diaries. Edited by Barbara Strachey and Jayne Samuels. London: Victor Gollancz, 1983. Pp. 319; 49 photographs. £12·95· BARBARA STRACHEY, AUTHOR of Remarkable Relations (1980), rightly thinks that our wish for greater depth of portrayal of the Pearsall Smith family is yet to be satisfied. In Mary Berenson, A Self-Portrait, edited by Barbara Strachey and Jayne Samuels, the Pearsall Smiths' eldest daugh­ ter Mary speaks 'for herself. Mary Berenson was a gifted correspondent and what she has to say is often remarkable both for its poignancy and its cultural significance. As wife and collaborator of the great scholar of Italian Renaissance art, Bernard Berenson, she has much to add to the history ofculture. But it is for her own tangled life that Mary Berenson's posthumous epistolary narrative is most significant: there is much we had not known. Mary Berenson, A Self-Portrait overlaps and amplifies Chap­ ters 6, 9 and 13 of Remarkable Relations, speaking for herself in elation and in despair, building empires in the world of art-dealing while the world of personal relationships disintegrates around her. The editors remain unobtrusive, letting Mary's voice intone its changes from girl­ hood to old age, from excited hope to disillusionment. They provide only the necessary informative links between and within the chapters of extracts from letters and diaries. The cumulative effect is powerful, making a documentary from which everyone interested in the rise of modernism and its personal consequences can learn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smiths - a Biographical Sketch with Selected Items from the Collection
    The Smiths - a Biographical Sketch with Selected Items from the Collection by Melvin E. Dieter Hannah Whitall Smith, her husband Robert Pearsall Smith, and their children have presented a stark anomaly to the many biographers and historians who have tried to tell their story. Because of the radical dichotomies which must be wrestled with in the telling, the story of this remarkable Quaker family often has not been told with balance, depth of understanding, and wholeness. The generations of Smiths who followed Hannah and Robert were completely immersed in a world of intellectual ability and literary talent. This assured that records of these exceptional people would be published and widely read. The philosophical ambience of that milieu, however, was strongly agnostic, contributing to more negative representations of the religious movements with which the Smiths were involved than might have been reported by interpreters with a transcendental view of reality. Mrs. Barbara Strachey Halpern, the Smiths' great-granddaughter, is the first to look at the history from a broader perspective. Mrs. Halpern's interest in a view from "another side" encouraged me to research in the family collection at her home in Oxford last fall. Her generosity also made it possible for Asbury Theological Seminary to purchase the "religious collection" section of the Smith family papers for the B.L. Fisher Library. The anomaly presented by this family's history is created by the two, almost mutually contradictory, historical images which Robert and Hannah seemed to reflect as they played out their public roles in two quite different nineteenth century worlds.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameron, Ritchie, Stephen and Woolf's Construc
    Notes Introduction: ‘Born into a Large Connection’ 1. Briggs employs genetic theory in her biography Virginia Woolf: An Inner Life (London: Allen Lane, 2005). She was also instrumental in setting up the Time Passes Project, an interactive genetic exploration of Woolf’s texts. See www.woolfonline.com. 1 ‘And Finally Virginia’: Cameron, Ritchie, Stephen and Woolf’s Constructs of her Ancestry 1. There are many different versions of his origins, exploits and even his name, which changed further as it was handed down through the generations. ‘The Chevalier de l’Étang (1757–1840) and his Descendants, the Pattles’ by Hugh Orange, revised by John Beaumont (2001) is useful but contains inaccuracies. Ronald Lessens (2009 and 2010) fills some gaps and reveals misconceptions by Woolf and other biographers. More remains to be uncovered of this colourful story. 2. Woolf suggests the term ‘Pattledom’ was coined by Henry Taylor (E4: 280, 377). Beaumont attributes it to Thackeray (unpublished research paper, ‘Thackeray in Pattledom’, Dimbola Museum, Freshwater, Isle of Wight), as does Brian Hill (1973: 19). 3. The best recent biography of Cameron is by Victoria Olsen (2003). Wolf (1998) and Ford (2003) have excellent introductions to her life and work. 4. There is currently no full biography of Stephen. Diane Gillespie and Elizabeth Steele ( JDS) have a useful biographical introduction. 5. Winifred Gérin’s (1981) biography of Ritchie is useful as is the more quirky Anny (2004) by Henrietta Garnett. John Aplin’s (2010; 2011) biography of the Thackeray family makes extensive use of previously unpublished material. 6. For discussion of the Freshwater Circle see Elizabeth Hutchings (1998), Veronica Gould (2006) and Charlotte Boyce et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitman's Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family
    Walt Whitman Quarterly Review http://ir.uiowa.edu/wwqr ”Don’t let us talk of that anymore”: Whitman’s Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family Joann P. Krieg Volume 17, Number 3 (Winter 2000) pps. 91-120 Stable URL: http://ir.uiowa.edu/wwqr/vol17/iss3/2 ISSN 0737-0679 Copyright c 2000 by The University of Iowa. ”Don’t let us talk of that anymore”: Whitman’s Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family Joann P. Krieg Abstract Traces Whitman’s long and complex relationship with Robert Pearsall Smith, his wife Hannah Whitall Smith, and their children, Logan Pearsall Smith, Alys Pearsall Smith, and Mary Whitall Smith Costelloe, and suggests that Mary’s love affair with Bernard Berenson in 1891 was a ma- jor reason for the cooling of the family’s affection for Whitman, a change in attitude noticed by Richard Maurice Bucke on his visit that year to the Smiths and Costelloes in England and com- municated by him to Whitman. "DON'T LET US TALK OF THAT ANYMORE": WHITMAN'S ESTRANGEMENT FROM THE COSTELLOE-SMITH FAMILY JOANN P. KruEG IN THE SUMMER of 1891 Dr. Richard M. Bucke visited England on two matters of business: the possible manufacture there of a gas and water meter invented by his brother-in-law, and a volume of essays on Walt Whitman for which he hoped to find a publisher. While there, he made use of a letter of introduction provided by Whitman to meet Alfred Tennyson and visited some of Whitman's English friends. The circle of friends included the family of Robert Pearsall Smith (1827-1898) and his married daughter Mary Costelloe (pronounced with the accent on the first syllable), to whom Whitman had been close when the family lived in Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Woolf in the Real World
    Woolf in the Real World Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Conference on Virginia Woolf Woolf in the Real World Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Conference on Virginia Woolf Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts 5–8 June 2003 Edited by Karen V. Kukil A full-text digital version of this book is available on the Internet, at the Center for Vir- ginia Woolf Studies, California State University, Bakersfield. Go to http://www.csub.edu/ woolf_center and click the Publications link. Works produced at Clemson University by the Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing, including The South Carolina Review and its themed series “Virginia Woolf International,” may be found at our Web site: http://www. clemson.edu/caah/cedp. Contact the director at 864-656-5399 for information. Copyright 2005 by Clemson University ISBN 0-9771263-2-3 Published by Clemson University Digital Press at the Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina. Produced at CEDP using Adobe Photoshop Elements CS, Adobe InDesign CS, and Micro- soft Word 2000. This book is set in Adobe Garamond Pro and was printed by University Printing Services, Office of Publications and Promotional Services, Clemson University. Copy editing and layout at the press by Christi Conti, assisted by Charis Chapman and Wayne Chapman (Executive Editor). To order copies, contact the Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing, Strode Tower, Box 340522, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0522. An order form is available at the digital press Web site (see above) under “SCROLL” and linked to the themed issue page entitled “Virginia Woolf International.” Front cover illustration: Vanessa Bell (British 1879-1961) Virginia Woolf, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitman's Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family
    Volume 17 Number 3 ( 2000) pps. 91-120 "Don't let us talk of that anymore": Whitman's Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family Joann P. Krieg ISSN 0737-0679 (Print) ISSN 2153-3695 (Online) Copyright © 2000 Joann P Krieg Recommended Citation Krieg, Joann P. ""Don't let us talk of that anymore": Whitman's Estrangement from the Costelloe- Smith Family." Walt Whitman Quarterly Review 17 (Winter 2000), 91-120. https://doi.org/ 10.13008/2153-3695.1579 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by Iowa Research Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review by an authorized administrator of Iowa Research Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "DON'T LET US TALK OF THAT ANYMORE": WHITMAN'S ESTRANGEMENT FROM THE COSTELLOE-SMITH FAMILY JOANN P. KruEG IN THE SUMMER of 1891 Dr. Richard M. Bucke visited England on two matters of business: the possible manufacture there of a gas and water meter invented by his brother-in-law, and a volume of essays on Walt Whitman for which he hoped to find a publisher. While there, he made use of a letter of introduction provided by Whitman to meet Alfred Tennyson and visited some of Whitman's English friends. The circle of friends included the family of Robert Pearsall Smith (1827-1898) and his married daughter Mary Costelloe (pronounced with the accent on the first syllable), to whom Whitman had been close when the family lived in Pennsylvania. After visiting the Smiths and Costelloes in Lon­ don, Bucke wrote to Whitman and Horace Traubel.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES in King's College Library, Cambridge
    Pro uesf Start here. This volume is a finding aid to a ProQuest Research Collection in Microform. To learn more visit: www.proquest.com or call (800) 521-0600 About ProQuest: ProQuest connects people with vetted, reliable information. Key to serious research, the company has forged a 70-year reputation as a gateway to the world's knowledge- from dissertations to governmental and cultural archives to news, in all its forms. Its role is essential to libraries and other organizations whose missions depend on the delivery of complete, trustworthy information. 789 E. Eisenhower Parkw~y • P.O Box 1346 • Ann Arbor, M148106-1346 • USA • Tel: 734.461.4700 • Toll-free 800-521-0600 • www.proquest.com A catalogue of the papers of JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES in King's College Library, Cambridge A catalogue of the papers of JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES in KING'S COLLEGE LIBRARY, CAMBRIDGE II.•• CHADWYCK-HEALEY LTD © 1995 Chadwyck-Healey Ltd All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written permission. Published by: Distributed in North America by: Chadwyck-Healey Ltd Chadwyck-Healey Inc. The Quorum 1101 King Street Barnwell Road Alexandria, VA 22314 Cambridge CBS SSW USA UK A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 85964 233 X Printed by Bookcraft Ltd, Midsomer Norton, UK CONTENTS Introductory notes IX Abbreviations Xl GENERAL SUBJECTS lA India Office Clerk 1906-8 1
    [Show full text]
  • Bloomsbury's Byzantium and the Writing of Modern Art
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2018 Bloomsbury's Byzantium and the Writing of Modern Art Elizabeth Sarah Berkowitz The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2537 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] BLOOMSBURY’S BYZANTIUM AND THE WRITING OF MODERN ART by ELIZABETH SARAH BERKOWITZ A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Art History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2018 © 2018 Elizabeth Sarah Berkowitz All Rights Reserved ii Bloomsbury’s Byzantium and the Writing of Modern Art by Elizabeth Sarah Berkowitz This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Art History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________ ________________________________________ Rose-Carol Washton Long Date Chair of Examining Committee _________________ ________________________________________ Rachel Kousser Date Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Jennifer Ball Rosemarie Haag Bletter Mark Hussey THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Bloomsbury’s Byzantium and the Writing of Modern Art by Elizabeth Berkowitz Advisor: Rose-Carol Washton Long “Bloomsbury’s Byzantium and the Writing of Modern Art” examines the role of Byzantine art in Bloomsbury art critics Roger Fry’s and Clive Bell’s narratives of aesthetic Modernism.
    [Show full text]
  • HANNAH WHITALL SMITH Women’S History Review, Vol
    HANNAH WHITALL SMITH Women’s History Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1998 Representation and Self-representation: Hannah Whitall Smith as family woman and religious guide [1] KERRI ALLEN University of Adelaide, Australia ABSTRACT This article focuses upon representations of Hannah Whitall Smith (1832-1911) and finds that most accounts of her portray her as a family woman, despite the fact that she was a social and political activist who wrote two best- selling religious guides based upon her own experience. But the author finds that in these works Hannah Whitall Smith represents herself as a domestic woman and denies any theological intent rather seeking to gain a voice by using a strategy of theological naivety. Hannah Whitall Smith (1832-1911) was a mother, grandmother and great-grandmother, a wife, a daughter, a sister and an aunt, a feminist, a Quaker, a preacher, a writer, a social activist, a friend. She was the matriarch of a family many of whose members became famous. One of Hannah’s daughters, Mary Berenson, was a feminist and an art critic whose second husband was Bernard Berenson. Her other daughter, Alys Russell, feminist and social activist, was Bertrand Russell’s first wife. Her son, Logan Pearsall Smith, was a well-known man of letters. Mary’s daughters, Hannah’s granddaughters, Ray Costelloe Strachey, feminist author and social activist, and Karin Costelloe Stephen, one of the first Freudian psychoanalysts and Cambridge lecturer, married into the Bloomsbury Group. Hannah Whitall Smith’s female-centred life included her sister Mary Whitall Thomas and her niece M. Carey Thomas, a feminist educator who became the first Dean and the second President of Bryn Mawr College for women in Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • Expatriate Gardens in Tuscany: Planting Ideas of Nationality
    Expatriate Gardens in Tuscany: Planting Ideas of Nationality Jessica Brown B.A. in Art and Design Columbia College Chicago, 2013 Thesis Committee: Michael Lee Lisa Reilly Anatole Tchikine A Thesis Presented to the Faculty Of the Department of Architectural History In the School of Architecture At the University of Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Master of Architectural History December 2017 2 Expatriate Gardens in Tuscany: Planting Ideas of Nationality An Evaluation of Three Gardens in the Anglo-American Creation of a Renaissance-Defined Nation 3 Contents Acknowledgements 4 List of Illustrations 5 1 Introduction 8 2 Villa Gamberaia 17 3 Villa I Tatti 26 4 La Foce 33 5 Conclusion 45 Bibliography 49 Illustrations 54 4 Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my thesis committee for their guidance, support, and patience. To Michael Lee, for heading the charge and to whom I owe the due credit of bringing me fully into the landscape world; Lisa Reilly for keeping me grounded and hammering home the details; and Anatole Tchikine, for lending his landscape passion and archival investigation skills. These three made the entire process possible, graciously giving of their time and efforts to help me succeed, and for a prolonged period than originally planned. My eternal gratitude for their flexibility and willingness to continue the journey with me even when on sabbatical. A good thesis is nothing without research, and for that, I thank Rebecca Cooper Coleman and her invaluable library assistance and sanity maintenance. Without my academic family, and the support of my family at home, this would never have happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychoanalysis and the Bloomsbury Group 1
    PSYCHOANALYSIS AND THE BLOOMSBURY GROUP 1 Psychoanalysis and the Bloomsbury Group Douglass W. Orr, M.D. ! Edited by Wayne K. Chapman 2 DOUGLASS W. ORR A full-text digital version of this book is available on the Internet, in addition to other works of the press and the Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing, including The South Carolina Review and The Upstart Crow:A Shakespeare Journal. See our Web site at www.clemson.edu/caah/cedp, or call the director at 864-656-5399 for information. Copyright 2004 by Clemson University Published by Clemson University Digital Press at the Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing (CEDP), College of Architecture, Arts and Humanities, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina. Produced by CEDP at Clemson University using Adobe Photoshop 5.5 , Adobe PageMaker 7, OmniPage Pro, and Microsoft Word 2000. This book is set in Garamond to allow on- demand printing by University Printing Services, Office of Publications and Promotional Services, Clemson University. Copy editing and layout at the press by Wayne K. Chapman (Executive Editor), assisted by Charis Chapman and Patrick Morton. To order copies, contact the Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing, Strode Tower, Box 340522, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0522. Acknowledgments We thank Nancy Orr Adams for making this publication possible. " This monograph is based on a 52-page paper read by the author, on April 21, 1978, to members of the San Diego Psychoanalytic Society in La Jolla, California. Intended for Psychoanalytic Quarterly, the paper has not been published until now even though it anticipated Orr’s posthumous book, Virginia Woolf’s Illnesses (2004), also available in this series.
    [Show full text]