Whitman's Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whitman's Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family Volume 17 Number 3 ( 2000) pps. 91-120 "Don't let us talk of that anymore": Whitman's Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family Joann P. Krieg ISSN 0737-0679 (Print) ISSN 2153-3695 (Online) Copyright © 2000 Joann P Krieg Recommended Citation Krieg, Joann P. ""Don't let us talk of that anymore": Whitman's Estrangement from the Costelloe- Smith Family." Walt Whitman Quarterly Review 17 (Winter 2000), 91-120. https://doi.org/ 10.13008/2153-3695.1579 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by Iowa Research Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review by an authorized administrator of Iowa Research Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "DON'T LET US TALK OF THAT ANYMORE": WHITMAN'S ESTRANGEMENT FROM THE COSTELLOE-SMITH FAMILY JOANN P. KruEG IN THE SUMMER of 1891 Dr. Richard M. Bucke visited England on two matters of business: the possible manufacture there of a gas and water meter invented by his brother-in-law, and a volume of essays on Walt Whitman for which he hoped to find a publisher. While there, he made use of a letter of introduction provided by Whitman to meet Alfred Tennyson and visited some of Whitman's English friends. The circle of friends included the family of Robert Pearsall Smith (1827-1898) and his married daughter Mary Costelloe (pronounced with the accent on the first syllable), to whom Whitman had been close when the family lived in Pennsylvania. After visiting the Smiths and Costelloes in Lon­ don, Bucke wrote to Whitman and Horace Traubel. His letters hint darkly at an alteration in their affections for Whitman and promise a fuller explanation to be given in person. 1 Whitman had suspected such an alteration, for there had been no letters from any of the Smiths for four months prior to the doctor's visit. 2 His suspicions gave rise to various speculations: perhaps his in­ advertent omission of their names from a Lippincott's article that men­ tioned some of his ardent supporters, or perhaps evil stories, of the type he insisted had followed him for years, were circulating in England and had caused them to turn away (WWC 8:394-395). But when the doctor told Whitman in person the particulars of his encounters with various members of the family, there was still no definite answer as to why they had changed, only the fact that they had done so. Except for one very friendly letter sUDsequent to Bucke's visit, from the son Logan Smith, there was never again any exchange between the family and the poet.3 Bucke's letters and his report tell us just as much as Whitman ever knew of the matter, and the Smiths have existed for Whitman scholars mainly in footnotes that offer only sketchy outlines of this remarkable family.4 To Whitman, however, they loomed large, and the loss of their friendship hurt him deeply. With the recent publication of the final books of Horace Traubel's record of conversations with Whitman, we can gauge for the first time the depth of that hurt as we trace the poet's recurring references to the matter and his confusion concerning it. Traubel's ac- 91 count ofBucke's report runs for almost four pages, describing Whitman as close to tears and finally bursting out, like Lear bemoaning Cordelia's banishment, "Don't let us talk of that anymore."5 To Traubel he had already admitted that the matter was "painful," but he knew he had to put it behind him without mourning since there was "not a beam of light" by which he could illuminate it: "It is, I suppose, one of the sev­ eral mysteries you fellows will one day, many days, have to clean up for me" (WWC 8:414). Readers of Whitman's correspondence, his daybooks, and his con­ versations with Horace Traubel, can piece together the story of this aborted friendship but are left as bewildered as the poet himself was by its abrupt termination, unable to "clean up" the mystery. Only by ven­ turing beyond the Whitman-related materials does one learn that the members of the Smith family authored at least forty published works and are the subjects of almost a dozen volumes. The attention that has been lavished on them oy biographers is not undeserved for they were, for the most part, remarkable individuals, and the number and extent of their contacts with notable persons in England and on the continent foreshorten the now current adage that only six degrees of separation exist between any two supposed strangers. To enter the world of the Pearsall Smiths is to stumble unawares into the most select literary and political society of the modem period. But since our purpose here is to elucidate the break-up of the relationship between the Smiths and Whit­ man, we shall only tangentially trace Whitman's influence on some in the wide circle of their kindred and friends. As to method, it would seem most useful to follow Dr. Bucke's analytical mode and, using some of his own words, consider the possible motive of each member of the family for the change of heart that ended the friendship between the Smiths and Whitman, before revealing the actual cause. 1. "The truth is, there is little change, except in Mrs. Costelloe."6 Mary Smith (1864-1945)-or, as the family preferred, Mary Whitall Smith-first read Leaves of Grass with no small degree of shock while studying at Smith College. There is a revealing glimpse of the way the book was passed from woman to woman in the 1880s in Mary's admis­ sion that it was one of her tutors who lent her the book, but with the caution not to speak of having read it. Mary piously informed her mother that, having been forewarned, she was able to avoid reading the worst parts. A few months later, however, she read the entire book and in a rush of enthusiasm began to extol its author in letters to her parents. Some years later, after she had married, Mary wrote in a letter to her mother how after reading Whittnan she solemnly took as her motto, "Henceforth I ordain myself loosed of all limits and imaginary lines / Going where I list, my own Master, total and absolute."7 It was a motto she acted upon. 92 Numerous published versions exist of how the first meeting be­ tween Whitman and the Smith family came about. One version, told by one of Mary's great granddaughters, says that Robert Smith had invited Whitman to lunch at their Germantown home in the suburbs of Phila­ delphia because he wished to please his daughter when she came home for a Christmas break.8 Mary's brother Logan, however, writing in 1937, remembers it as an Easter visit in 1882 that lasted a month!9 Henry Bryan Binns's 1905 biography of Whitman pays considerable attention to the friendship between Whitman and the Smith family, which may be the result of a personal acquaintance, since members of the family had by then been living in Binns's native England for some time. Binns claims that at Mary's insistence her father drove her to Camden, where Whitman, in the Stevens Street home of George and Louisa Whitman, received Mary's adulation "with a kindly, affectionate amusement. "10 And, according to Binns, the invitation to come to Germantown that very day for an extended visit was spontaneously offered. Whitman is said to have yielded at least partly because of the handsome horse and carriage the Smiths had left waiting and which he glimpsed from the front window. A letter from Mary to her mother the following March, 1883, expresses her wish "to have W.W. one night with us," and recalls her excitement at going to meet him for the first time: "Theophile Gautier, when he first went to see Victor Hugo, fainted at his front doorstep. I did not faint on the marble steps of the little Camden house, but I shall never forget my feelings" (MB 25). Whatever the circumstances of that first meeting, a short stay in Germantown at Christmas, 1882, followed by another at the arrival of the new year are indicated in Whitman's daybook and in his correspon­ dence. 11 They were the first of many such visits, one for as long as a month (which accounts for Logan Smith's remembrance), most insti­ gated by Mary and her father, as in November of 1884 when Robert asked Mary what he could do to make her Thanksgiving vacation happy, and Mary responded, "Persuade Mr. Whitman to come over!"12 Mary's mother, Hannah Whitall Smith (1832-1911), remained as disapproving of the poet of Leaves of Grass as she had been when she first warned her daughter against reading his work, claiming he "must be perfectly horrid as a man." Hannah's feelings about men-that they were generally "horrid"-led her to further counsel Mary against ad­ mitting to having read Whitman for fear she would incite "impure" thoughts of herself in the minds of "some young men." "If thee knew," she wrote, "more of men and their overpowering passions thee would understand how inflammatory such things as W. W. has written must necessarily be to many men, in fact to most."13 Mary defended her hero's morality by pointing out that "he means that the sexual act should never take place except with direct reference to the child who is to be 93 the result.
Recommended publications
  • 60 Geoffrey Scott, 1914
    Geoffrey Scott, 1914. 60 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/1526381041165494 by guest on 27 September 2021 Geoffrey Scott and the Dream-Life of Architecture MARK CAMPBELL When the English aesthete Geoffrey Scott sat down in the spring of 1918 to continue the “history of taste” he had begun four years earlier with the Architecture of Humanism, he was struck by a frustratingly sudden attack of writer’s block. The severity of this attack was even more pronounced given his long-standing plans to add to this history; yet in spite of his initial enthu- siasm, Scott’s daughter-in-law, the writer Iris Origo, vividly remembered the scene in his study, where a large piece of foolscap . lay for many weeks upon the centre of his desk, bearing, in his fine scholar’s hand, the following words, and these only: A HISTORY OF TASTE Volume I Chapter I “It is very difficult . .”1 Origo was alluding not only to Scott’s difficulty with writing, however, but to the gravity of his “black moods,” which left him “incapable of doing any work” and would ultimately result in his complete nervous breakdown later that year.2 Following his doctor’s concerned advice, Scott traveled to Switzerland, where he was treated in the Lausanne clinic of Dr. Roger Vittoz (1863–1925), one of the preeminent psychologists of the period and the author of the mag- isterial Treatment of Neurasthenia by Teaching of Brain Control.3 With a perfunctory sweep of his hand, Vittoz proclaimed Scott a neurasthenic, his much-preferred diagnosis, and prescribed a lengthy course of treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Lago Collection Scope and Content Note
    Special Collections 401 Ellis Library Columbia, MO 65201 (573) 882-0076 & Rare Books [email protected] University of Missouri Libraries http://library.missouri.edu/specialcollections/ Mary Lago Collection Scope and Content Note The massive correspondence of E. M. Forster, which Professor Lago gathered from archives all over the world, is one of the prominent features of the collection, with over 15,000 letters. It was assembled in preparation for an edition of selected letters that she edited in collaboration with P. N. Furbank, Forster’s authorized biographer. A similar archive of Forster letters has been deposited in King’s College. The collection also includes copies of the correspondence of William Rothenstein, Edward John Thompson, Max Beerbohm, Rabindranath Tagore, Edward Burne-Jones, D.S. MacColl, Christiana Herringham, and Arthur Henry Fox-Strangways. These materials were also gathered by her in preparation for subsequent books. In addition, the collection contains Lago’s extensive personal and professional correspondence, including correspondence with Buddhadeva Bose, Penelope Fitzgerald, P.N. Furbank, Dilys Hamlett, Krishna Kripalani, Celia Rooke, Stella Rhys, Satyajit Ray, Amitendranath Tagore, E.P. Thompson, Lance Thirkell, Pratima Tagore, John Rothenstein and his family, Eric and Nancy Crozier, Michael Holroyd, Margaret Drabble, Santha Rama Rau, Hsiao Ch’ien, Ted Uppmann, Edith Weiss-Mann, Arthur Mendel, Zia Moyheddin and numerous others. The collection is supplemented by extensive files related to each of her books, proof copies of these books, and files related to her academic career, honors, awards, and memorabilia. Personal material includes her journals and diaries that depict the tenuous position of a woman in the male-dominated profession of the early seventies.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Colby
    1 Palaces Eternal and Serene: The Vision of Altamura and Isabella Stewart Gardner’s Fenway Court* Robert Colby The 8 December 1907 edition of the Boston Herald claimed to have solved the mystery of a new building at Isabella Gardner’s Fenway Court: “STOREHOUSE BUILT COSTLY AS PALACE.” It went on to explain how the building was erected to house works of art for which there was no room in the museum that had been completed only four years before. Its curious and monumental design, the paper noted, was based on that of a monastery. Like most everything at Fenway Court, the whimsical structure with its baroque detail, austere walls, and oversized trellises was the subject of intense speculation, although its chief practical function was to house carriages and motorcars. Gardner died in 1924, and over the course of the twentieth century the building fell into disrepair. The once-high walls were incrementally lowered and the trellises dismantled, leaving the impression of a stand-alone outbuilding: “the carriage house.” In July of 2009, the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum demolished what remained of the structure in order to build a new addition. In its original design, the building referred to Altamura, an aesthetic utopia that was the subject of an essay conceived of by Bernard Berenson, Mary Smith Costelloe, and Logan Pearsall Smith.1 “Altamura” appeared in 1898 in the trio’s self-published “little periodical,” the Golden Urn, and described the yearlong liturgy of a fictive English monastery dedicated to “St. Dion” in an indeterminate Italian locale. The essay outlines a new religion, expressing the full measure of aestheticism’s philosophical potential as Epicurean materialism that was yet possessed of a transcendent dimension.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Barbara Strachey and Jayne Samuels, Eds., Mary Berenson, a Self-Portrait from Her Lett
    Reviews Mariechen's self-knowledge by Andrew Brink Mary Berenson, A Self-Portrait from her Letters & Diaries. Edited by Barbara Strachey and Jayne Samuels. London: Victor Gollancz, 1983. Pp. 319; 49 photographs. £12·95· BARBARA STRACHEY, AUTHOR of Remarkable Relations (1980), rightly thinks that our wish for greater depth of portrayal of the Pearsall Smith family is yet to be satisfied. In Mary Berenson, A Self-Portrait, edited by Barbara Strachey and Jayne Samuels, the Pearsall Smiths' eldest daugh­ ter Mary speaks 'for herself. Mary Berenson was a gifted correspondent and what she has to say is often remarkable both for its poignancy and its cultural significance. As wife and collaborator of the great scholar of Italian Renaissance art, Bernard Berenson, she has much to add to the history ofculture. But it is for her own tangled life that Mary Berenson's posthumous epistolary narrative is most significant: there is much we had not known. Mary Berenson, A Self-Portrait overlaps and amplifies Chap­ ters 6, 9 and 13 of Remarkable Relations, speaking for herself in elation and in despair, building empires in the world of art-dealing while the world of personal relationships disintegrates around her. The editors remain unobtrusive, letting Mary's voice intone its changes from girl­ hood to old age, from excited hope to disillusionment. They provide only the necessary informative links between and within the chapters of extracts from letters and diaries. The cumulative effect is powerful, making a documentary from which everyone interested in the rise of modernism and its personal consequences can learn.
    [Show full text]
  • International Virginia Woolf Society Bibliography of Woolf Studies Published in 2005 (With Addenda for Previous Years). Compiled
    International Virginia Woolf Society Bibliography of Woolf Studies Published in 2005 (with addenda for previous years). Compiled by Mark Hussey Please send additions and corrections to Celia Marshik, Historian/Bibliographer: [email protected] BOOKS (including those with significant reference to Woolf) Alter, Robert. Imagined Cities: Urban Experience and the Language of the Novel. New Haven: Yale UP, 2005. [see chapter 6 “Woolf: Urban Pastoral”] Bivar, Antonio. Bivar na Corte de Bloomsbury. Sao Paulo: A Girafa Editoria, 2005. Briggs, Julia. Virginia Woolf: An Inner Life. Orlando: Harcourt, 2005 Caine, Barbara. From Bombay to Bloomsbury: A Biography of the Strachey Family. NY: Oxford UP, 2005. Castle, Terry. The Literature of Lesbianism: A Historical Anthology from Ariosto to Stonewall. NY: Columbia UP, 2005. Curtis, Vanessa. The Hidden Houses of Virginia Woolf and Vanessa Bell. London: Robert Hale, 2005. Dalrymple, Theodore. Our Culture, What’s Left of It: The Mandarins and the Masses. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2005. Froula, Christine. Virginia Woolf and the Bloomsbury Avant-Garde: War, Civilization, Modernity. NY: Columbia UP, 2005. Gruber, Ruth. Virginia Woolf: The Will to Create as a Woman. NY: Carroll & Graf, 2005. Hall, Sarah M. Before Leonard: Virginia Woolf’s Unsuitable Suitors. London: Peter Owen 2005. Humm, Maggie. Snapshots of Bloomsbury: The Private Lives of Virginia Woolf and Vanessa Bell. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2005. Kostkowska, Justyna. Virginia Woolf's Experiment in Genre and Politics 1926-1931: Visioning and Versioning The Waves. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, 2005. Kottler, Jeffrey. Divine Madness: Ten Stories of Creative Struggle. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005. Kukil, Karen V., ed. Woolf in the Real World: Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Conference on Virginia Woolf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smith, H.W. Mss., 1817-1987, Consist Primarily of Letters Of
    The Smith, H.W. mss., 1817-1987, consist primarily of letters of Hannah (Whitall) Smith,1832-1911, her two daughters Mary (Smith) Berenson, 1864-1945, and Alys Whitall Pearsall (Smith) Russell, 1867-1951, and Mary's two daughters Ray (Costelloe) Strachey, 1887- 1940, and Karin (Costelloe) Stephen, 1889-1953. Hannah and her husband Robert settled in the Quaker community of Germantown, Pennsylvania after their marriage in 1851. Hannah began preaching and writing on religious subjects, and later became involved in the temperance and suffrage movements. When Mary married an English barrister in 1888, the family moved to England where Hannah continued her work. It was there that Alys married philosopher Bertrand Russell. Alys joined her mother in working for women's rights and had a keen interest in political issues. Meanwhile Mary's marriage to Frank Costelloe failed soon after the birth of their second daughter Karin. Mary left England to tour the museums and cathedrals of Europe with her future husband, art critic Bernard Berenson. Mary's daughters Ray and Karin stayed in England with their father and thrived under the influence of their grandmother Hannah. Ray became the third generation of "Whitall" women to devote her life to women's issues, while Karin became a pioneer in Freudian psychoanalysis and one of Britain's first psychoanalysts. The circle of friends and relatives broadened further when Ray married into the Strachey family and Karin wed Virginia Woolf's brother Adrian Stephen. The correspondence is mostly among these five women, but included is correspondence with other members of the Smith family, extended relations and friends both in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannah Whitall Smith ARC1983 -002 - Finding Aid Hannah Whitall Smith
    Asbury Theological Seminary ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange Finding Aids Special Collections 2012 Hannah Whitall Smith ARC1983 -002 - Finding Aid Hannah Whitall Smith Follow this and additional works at: http://place.asburyseminary.edu/findingaids Recommended Citation Smith, Hannah Whitall, "Hannah Whitall Smith ARC1983 -002 - Finding Aid" (2012). Finding Aids. Book 49. http://place.asburyseminary.edu/findingaids/49 This Finding Aid is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Asbury Theological Seminary Information Services Special Collections Papers of Hannah Whitall Smith ARC1983 -002 Asbury Theological Seminary Information Services Special Collections Papers of Hannah Whitall Smith ARC1983 -002 Introduction The Hannah Whitall Smith Papers (1847-1960) include personal materials that relate to Hannah Whitall Smith’s career as an evangelist, author, feminist, and temperance reformer. The Papers cover especially her adult years, from 1850 until her death in 1911. Her family has added a few pieces to the collection throughout the years following her death. The papers are composed of correspondence sent to Hannah W. Smith; subject files, including a large section of clippings, pamphlets, books, and broadsides about fanaticisms of her day, which she herself collected; literary productions, including her journal (1849-1880); printed materials; and photographic materials. The Special Collections Department of the B.L. Fisher Library received the Hannah Whitall Smith Papers collection, which contains 4.8 cubic feet of manuscript materials, in 1983 from Barbara M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smiths - a Biographical Sketch with Selected Items from the Collection
    The Smiths - a Biographical Sketch with Selected Items from the Collection by Melvin E. Dieter Hannah Whitall Smith, her husband Robert Pearsall Smith, and their children have presented a stark anomaly to the many biographers and historians who have tried to tell their story. Because of the radical dichotomies which must be wrestled with in the telling, the story of this remarkable Quaker family often has not been told with balance, depth of understanding, and wholeness. The generations of Smiths who followed Hannah and Robert were completely immersed in a world of intellectual ability and literary talent. This assured that records of these exceptional people would be published and widely read. The philosophical ambience of that milieu, however, was strongly agnostic, contributing to more negative representations of the religious movements with which the Smiths were involved than might have been reported by interpreters with a transcendental view of reality. Mrs. Barbara Strachey Halpern, the Smiths' great-granddaughter, is the first to look at the history from a broader perspective. Mrs. Halpern's interest in a view from "another side" encouraged me to research in the family collection at her home in Oxford last fall. Her generosity also made it possible for Asbury Theological Seminary to purchase the "religious collection" section of the Smith family papers for the B.L. Fisher Library. The anomaly presented by this family's history is created by the two, almost mutually contradictory, historical images which Robert and Hannah seemed to reflect as they played out their public roles in two quite different nineteenth century worlds.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameron, Ritchie, Stephen and Woolf's Construc
    Notes Introduction: ‘Born into a Large Connection’ 1. Briggs employs genetic theory in her biography Virginia Woolf: An Inner Life (London: Allen Lane, 2005). She was also instrumental in setting up the Time Passes Project, an interactive genetic exploration of Woolf’s texts. See www.woolfonline.com. 1 ‘And Finally Virginia’: Cameron, Ritchie, Stephen and Woolf’s Constructs of her Ancestry 1. There are many different versions of his origins, exploits and even his name, which changed further as it was handed down through the generations. ‘The Chevalier de l’Étang (1757–1840) and his Descendants, the Pattles’ by Hugh Orange, revised by John Beaumont (2001) is useful but contains inaccuracies. Ronald Lessens (2009 and 2010) fills some gaps and reveals misconceptions by Woolf and other biographers. More remains to be uncovered of this colourful story. 2. Woolf suggests the term ‘Pattledom’ was coined by Henry Taylor (E4: 280, 377). Beaumont attributes it to Thackeray (unpublished research paper, ‘Thackeray in Pattledom’, Dimbola Museum, Freshwater, Isle of Wight), as does Brian Hill (1973: 19). 3. The best recent biography of Cameron is by Victoria Olsen (2003). Wolf (1998) and Ford (2003) have excellent introductions to her life and work. 4. There is currently no full biography of Stephen. Diane Gillespie and Elizabeth Steele ( JDS) have a useful biographical introduction. 5. Winifred Gérin’s (1981) biography of Ritchie is useful as is the more quirky Anny (2004) by Henrietta Garnett. John Aplin’s (2010; 2011) biography of the Thackeray family makes extensive use of previously unpublished material. 6. For discussion of the Freshwater Circle see Elizabeth Hutchings (1998), Veronica Gould (2006) and Charlotte Boyce et al.
    [Show full text]
  • J. J. Wilson Sonoma State College
    00 Number 10 Spring and Summer 1978 Having explored the entire experimental gamut of TO THE READERS modernism in one astonishing decade, 1910 to 1920, it remained to him to attempt to resolve that apparent dualism It has been a special pleasure editing this issue of the Virginia between representational and non-representational art which Woolf Miscellany during my stay in England. Though it meant he considered misleading and culturally inhibiting. This belief delaying the publication considerably, the perspectives added effectively left him in a situation of semi-exile on the outskirts make VWM more truly international. We hope that writers from of the 'official' British art world with which, in any case, he abroad will continue to enrich our understanding of Virginia had little sympathy. His influence was consistently felt Woolf and invite them to send any brief written contribution (no however for over half a century, both as a teacher - though no more than 1200 words) to VWM'snext editor, Jane Marcus, The teacher was ever less didactic - and as a prime mover behind Newberry Library, 60 W.Walton St., Chicago, Illinois 60610. Her the development of such institutions as C.E.M.A., the A.I.A., deadline will have to be soon (October 2), if we are to return to The Euston Road School, and the Arts Council of Great the regular publishing schedule. Britain. There are so many old and new books that need reviewing, so Duncan was a great encourager. He got people to do things. many notes and queries we all have, as well as jokes, diatribes, In this respect an example which characterizes a lifetime's poems, art work, etc., "so much still to be pondered about," as work is provided by the Omega Workshops, where, while the Washington ST AR recently said in a review of Bloomsbury Roger Fry was out chatting up patrons, he assembled a host of books, that every issue, even enormous ones like Winter 1977, has talented and under-employed painters to the task of to leave out a lot of good material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marriage of Bertrand Russell and Alys Pearsall Smith by Sheila Turcon
    A Quaker wedding: the marriage of Bertrand Russell and Alys Pearsall Smith by Sheila Turcon "EVERYONE IS CONSUMED with curiosity about a Quaker wed­ ding", an excited Alys wrote to Bertie on 25 November 1894, only a few weeks before their marriage at the Friends Meeting House in St. Martin's Lane, Westminster. She went on to say that she was "very sorry to make a sensation" by insisting on the Quaker ceremony. Her concern about the ceremony, however, could not obscure her delight in their approaching marriage. She was ex­ tremely happy that she was finally to be married in a religious service to a man of dazzling intellect whom she loved so deeply that her love was a form of worship-a man who had already renounced organized religion but who had agreed to the arrange­ ments at her insistence. The story of Alys and Bertie's reliltion­ ship, including their troubled and time-tested 'courtship, their first happy years of married life, their marital problems which led to estrangement, separation and finally divorce, has been re­ counted elsewhere.! Here the reader will learn of only one I See Barbara Strachey, Remarkable Relations: The Story of the Pearsall Smith Family (London: Victor Gollancz, 1980); Ronald W. Clark, The Life ofBer­ trand Russell (London: Jonathan Cape and, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1975); Andrew Brink, "Love and Conflict in Bertrand Russell's Letters", Queen's Quarterly, 86 (1979): 1-15. I would like to thank Edward Milligan and Malcolm Thomas of Friends House Library, Mrs. Barbara Halpern (nee Strachey) ofOxford, and Stephen A.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitman's Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family
    Walt Whitman Quarterly Review http://ir.uiowa.edu/wwqr ”Don’t let us talk of that anymore”: Whitman’s Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family Joann P. Krieg Volume 17, Number 3 (Winter 2000) pps. 91-120 Stable URL: http://ir.uiowa.edu/wwqr/vol17/iss3/2 ISSN 0737-0679 Copyright c 2000 by The University of Iowa. ”Don’t let us talk of that anymore”: Whitman’s Estrangement from the Costelloe-Smith Family Joann P. Krieg Abstract Traces Whitman’s long and complex relationship with Robert Pearsall Smith, his wife Hannah Whitall Smith, and their children, Logan Pearsall Smith, Alys Pearsall Smith, and Mary Whitall Smith Costelloe, and suggests that Mary’s love affair with Bernard Berenson in 1891 was a ma- jor reason for the cooling of the family’s affection for Whitman, a change in attitude noticed by Richard Maurice Bucke on his visit that year to the Smiths and Costelloes in England and com- municated by him to Whitman. "DON'T LET US TALK OF THAT ANYMORE": WHITMAN'S ESTRANGEMENT FROM THE COSTELLOE-SMITH FAMILY JOANN P. KruEG IN THE SUMMER of 1891 Dr. Richard M. Bucke visited England on two matters of business: the possible manufacture there of a gas and water meter invented by his brother-in-law, and a volume of essays on Walt Whitman for which he hoped to find a publisher. While there, he made use of a letter of introduction provided by Whitman to meet Alfred Tennyson and visited some of Whitman's English friends. The circle of friends included the family of Robert Pearsall Smith (1827-1898) and his married daughter Mary Costelloe (pronounced with the accent on the first syllable), to whom Whitman had been close when the family lived in Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]