DOCSLIB.ORG

Nutrition Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nutrition Program Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized SENEGAL A Decade of World Bank Support to Senegal’s Nutrition Program Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 110290 DECEMBER 21, 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized © 2016 International Bank for Reconstruction This work is a product of the staff of The World RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS and Development / The World Bank Bank with external contributions. The findings, The material in this work is subject to copyright. 1818 H Street NW interpretations, and conclusions expressed in Because The World Bank encourages Washington DC 20433 this work do not necessarily reflect the views of dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be Telephone: 202-473-1000 The World Bank, its Board of Executive reproduced, in whole or in part, for Internet: www.worldbank.org Directors, or the governments they represent. noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The Any queries on rights and licenses, including boundaries, colors, denominations, and other subsidiary rights, should be addressed to information shown on any map in this work do World Bank Publications, The World Bank not imply any judgment on the part of The Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC World Bank concerning the legal status of any 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: territory or the endorsement or acceptance of [email protected]. such boundaries. ` Report No.: 110290 PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT SENEGAL NUTRITION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM ( IDA CREDIT NO. 36190) NUTRITION ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IN SUPPORT OF THE SECOND PHASE OF THE NUTRITION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM ( IDA CREDIT NO. 42450) ADDITIONAL FINANCING FOR THE SECOND PHASE OF THE NUTRITION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM ( IDA CREDIT NO. 50840) RAPID RESPONSE CHILD-FOCUSED SOCIAL CASH TRANSFER AND NUTRITION SECURITY PROJECT ( IDA CREDIT NO. 46050) & AND MULTIDONOR TRUST FUND FOR THE GLOBAL FOOD PRICE CRISIS RESPONSE PROGRAM (TF 94372) DECEMBER 21, 2016 Human Development and Economic Management Independent Evaluation Group ii Currency Equivalents (Annual Averages) Currency Unit = CFA Franc (CFAF) 2002 US$1.00 CFAF 664.54 2003 US$1.00 CFAF 628.93 2004 US$1.00 CFAF 551.27 2005 US$1.00 CFAF 516.19 2006 US$1.00 CFAF 539.44 2007 US$1.00 CFAF 503.03 2008 US$1.00 CFAF 447.77 2009 US$1.00 CFAF 479.02 2010 US$1.00 CFAF 473.00 2011 US$1.00 CFAF 481.81 2012 US$1.00 CFAF 490.53 2013 US$1.00 CFAF 507.49 2014 US$1.00 CFAF 483.60 2015 US$1.00 CFAF 500.67 Abbreviations and Acronyms APL Adaptable Program Loan PAD Project Appraisal Document CAS Country Assistance Strategy PDO project development objective CEA Community Executing Agency PPAR Project Performance Assessment Report CLM Cellule de Lutte contre la Malnutrition PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper CNP Community Nutrition Project SDR special drawing rights CPS Country Partnership Strategy SMART Standardized Monitoring and DHS Demographic and Health Survey Assessment of Relief and HNP Health, Nutrition, and Population Transitions ICR Implementation Completion and Results UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund Report USAID U.S. Agency for International Development IEG Independent Evaluation Group WFP World Food Programme IMCI Integrated Management of Childhood WHO World Health Organization Illness KPC Knowledge, Practice, Coverage NEP Nutrition Enhancement Program NGO nongovernmental organization Fiscal Year Government: January 1 – December 31 Director-General, Independent Evaluation Ms. Caroline Heider Director, Human Development and Economic Management Mr. Zeljko Bogetic (Acting) Manager, Corporate and Human Development Mr. Rasmus Heltberg (Acting) Task Manager Ms. Susan A. Caceres iii Contents Principal Ratings ............................................................................................................... vii Key Staff Responsible...................................................................................................... viii Preface................................................................................................................................ xi Summary .......................................................................................................................... xiii 1. Background and Context................................................................................................. 1 General Background ....................................................................................................... 1 Nutrition .......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Nutrition Enhancement Program .................................................................................... 5 Objectives, Design, and Relevance ................................................................................. 5 Project Development Objectives................................................................................. 5 Relevance of Objective ............................................................................................... 6 Project Design ............................................................................................................. 9 Relevance of Design ................................................................................................... 9 Implementation ............................................................................................................. 11 Factors Affecting Implementation ............................................................................ 12 Achievement of Objectives ........................................................................................... 13 Objective 1 ................................................................................................................ 13 Objective 2 ................................................................................................................ 15 Efficiency ...................................................................................................................... 18 Ratings .......................................................................................................................... 19 Project Outcome........................................................................................................ 19 Risk to Development Outcome ................................................................................. 19 World Bank Performance ......................................................................................... 20 Borrower Performance .............................................................................................. 21 Monitoring and Evaluation ....................................................................................... 22 3. Nutrition Enhancement Project in Support of the Second Phase of the Nutrition Enhancement Program ...................................................................................................... 24 Objectives, Design, and Relevance ............................................................................... 24 Project Development Objectives............................................................................... 24 Relevance of Objective ............................................................................................. 25 Project Design ........................................................................................................... 26 This report was prepared by Denise Anne Vaillancourt, who assessed the project in April 2016, with the technical input of Amadou Hassane Sylla, Senegalese consultant. The report was peer reviewed by Ziauddin Hyder and panel reviewed by Judyth Twigg. Aline Dukuze provided administrative support. iv Relevance of Design ................................................................................................. 26 Implementation ............................................................................................................. 29 Factors Affecting Implementation ............................................................................ 29 Achievement of Objectives ........................................................................................... 30 Objective 1 ................................................................................................................ 31 Efficiency ...................................................................................................................... 35 Ratings .......................................................................................................................... 36 Project Outcome........................................................................................................ 36 Risk to Development Outcome ................................................................................. 36 World Bank Performance ......................................................................................... 37 Borrower Performance .............................................................................................. 38 Monitoring and Evaluation ....................................................................................... 40 4. Rapid Response Child-Focused Social Cash Transfer and Nutrition Security Project 42 Objectives, Design, and Relevance ............................................................................... 42 Project Development Objectives..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Livelihood Zone Descriptions
    Government of Senegal COMPREHENSIVE FOOD SECURITY AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS (CFSVA) Livelihood Zone Descriptions WFP/FAO/SE-CNSA/CSE/FEWS NET Introduction The WFP, FAO, CSE (Centre de Suivi Ecologique), SE/CNSA (Commissariat National à la Sécurité Alimentaire) and FEWS NET conducted a zoning exercise with the goal of defining zones with fairly homogenous livelihoods in order to better monitor vulnerability and early warning indicators. This exercise led to the development of a Livelihood Zone Map, showing zones within which people share broadly the same pattern of livelihood and means of subsistence. These zones are characterized by the following three factors, which influence household food consumption and are integral to analyzing vulnerability: 1) Geography – natural (topography, altitude, soil, climate, vegetation, waterways, etc.) and infrastructure (roads, railroads, telecommunications, etc.) 2) Production – agricultural, agro-pastoral, pastoral, and cash crop systems, based on local labor, hunter-gatherers, etc. 3) Market access/trade – ability to trade, sell goods and services, and find employment. Key factors include demand, the effectiveness of marketing systems, and the existence of basic infrastructure. Methodology The zoning exercise consisted of three important steps: 1) Document review and compilation of secondary data to constitute a working base and triangulate information 2) Consultations with national-level contacts to draft initial livelihood zone maps and descriptions 3) Consultations with contacts during workshops in each region to revise maps and descriptions. 1. Consolidating secondary data Work with national- and regional-level contacts was facilitated by a document review and compilation of secondary data on aspects of topography, production systems/land use, land and vegetation, and population density.
    [Show full text]
  • SENEGAL Work Plan FY 2017 Project Year 6
    SENEGAL Work Plan FY 2017 Project Year 6 October 2016‒September 2017 ENVISION is a global project led by RTI International in partnership with CBM International, The Carter Center, Fred Hollows Foundation, Helen Keller International, IMA World Health, Light for the World, Sightsavers, and World Vision. ENVISION is funded by the US Agency for International Development under cooperative agreement No. AID-OAA-A-11-00048. The period of performance for ENVISION is September 30, 2011 through September 30, 2019. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ENVISION PROJECT OVERVIEW The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)’s ENVISION project (2011‒2019) is designed to support the vision of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its member states by targeting the control and elimination of seven neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), including lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis (OV), schistosomiasis (SCH), three soil-transmitted helminths (STH; roundworm, whipworm, and hookworm), and trachoma. ENVISION’s goal is to strengthen NTD programming at the global and country levels and support Ministries of Health (MOHs) to achieve their NTD control and elimination goals. At the global level, ENVISION—in close coordination and collaboration with WHO, USAID, and other stakeholders—contributes to several technical areas in support of global NTD control and elimination goals, including the following: • drug and diagnostics procurement where global donation programs are unavailable • capacity strengthening • management and implementation of ENVISION’s Technical Assistance Facility (TAF) • disease mapping • NTD policy and technical guideline development • NTD monitoring and evaluation (M&E).
    [Show full text]
  • Drylands Research Working Paper 13
    Drylands Research Working Paper 13 RÉGION DE DIOURBEL : LES ASPECTS DÉMOGRAPHIQUES Abdourahmane Barry Fallou Ndiaye, Salif Ndiaye Mary Tiffen 2000 Drylands Research Crewkerne Somerset TA18 8BJ Royaume-Uni Ce document a été présenté pour la première fois à l’Atelier sur les rapports entre politiques gouvernementales et investissements paysans dans les régions semi-arides, tenu à Bambey et Dakar (Sénégal) du 12 au 14 janvier 2000. Les recherches présentées dans le présent document de travail s’inscrivent dans le cadre d’une étude sur les Rapports entre les politiques gouvernementales et les investissements paysans en Afrique semi-aride, financée par le Programme de recherche sur les politiques en matière de ressources naturelles du Department for International Development (DFID), ministère britannique du développement (Projet R 7072 CA). Les informations fournies et opinions exprimées n’engagent en aucune manière le DFID. ISSN 1470-9384 Drylands Research 2000 Mise en page: Drylands Research. Impression: Press-tige Print, Crewkerne. Tous droits réservés. Aucune partie de cette publication ne peut être reproduite, stockée dans un système de recherche documentaire ni transmise sous une forme ou par un moyen quelconque (électronique, mécanique, photocopie, enregistrement ou autre) sans l’autorisation préalable et écrite de l’éditeur. ii Préface Les documents de travail du groupe Recherche sur les zones semi-arides présentent en version préliminaire les résultats d’études entreprises en association avec des chercheurs et institutions partenaires. Le présent document de travail s’inscrit dans le cadre d’une étude visant à établir les liens entre modifications à long terme de l’environnement, croissance démographique et évolutions technologiques, et à repérer les politiques et les institutions aptes à favoriser un développement durable.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Investing in Senegal
    SENegal – COUNTRY Profile Contents 1 Background 2 6.6 Right to private ownership and establishment 8 6.7 Protection of property rights 9 2 Population 2 2.1 Population figures 2 6.8 Transparency of the regulatory system 9 2.2 Population growth rate 2 6.9 Efficient capital markets and portfolio investment 9 2.3 Age structure (2012 estimates) 2 6.10 Political violence 9 2.4 Gender ratios (2012 estimates) 2 6.11 Corruption 9 2.5 Life expectancy (2012 estimates) 2 6.12 Bilateral investment agreements 10 2.6 Ethnic groups 2 6.13 Labour 10 2.7 Language 2 6.14 Foreign trade zones / free ports 10 2.8 Religion 3 6.15 Major foreign investors 10 2.9 Education 3 6.16 Setting up a company 10 2.10 Health 3 7 Country risk summary 10 7.1 Sovereign risk 10 3 Economy 3 3.1 Latest Economic indicators 4 7.2 Currency risk 10 3.2 Five-year forecast summary 4 7.3 Banking sector risk 11 3.3 Annual trends 5 7.4 Political risk 11 7.5 Economic structure risk 11 4 Government and Politics 5 4.1 Political structure 5 8 Country Outlook: 2012 – 2016 11 8.1 Political stability 11 5 Transport and Communications 6 8.2 Election watch 11 5.1 Roads 6 8.3 International relations 11 5.2 Railways 6 8.4 Policy trends 11 5.3 Ports and harbours 6 8.5 Economic growth 11 5.4 Airports 6 8.6 Inflation 11 5.5 Telecommunications 6 8.7 Exchange rates 12 6 Investing in Senegal 7 8.8 External sector 12 6.1 Openness to foreign investment 7 A Appendix - sources of information 12 6.2 Conversion and transfer policies 7 6.3 Expropriation and compensation 8 6.4 Dispute settlement 8 6.5 Performance requirements and incentives 8 © 2012 KPMG Services Proprietary Limited, a South African company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayesian Spatial Models Applied to Malaria Epidemiology
    Bayesian spatial models applied to malaria epidemiology INAUGURALDISSERTATION zur Erlangung der W¨urdeeines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at der Universit¨atBasel von Federica Giardina aus Pescara, Italien Basel, December 2015 Original document stored on the publication server of the University of Basel edoc.unibas.ch Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨atauf Antrag von Prof. Dr. M. Tanner, P.D. Dr. P. Vounatsou, and Prof. Dr. A. Biggeri. Basel, den 10 December 2013 Prof. Dr. J¨orgSchibler Dekan Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house. (Henri Poincar´e) iv Summary Malaria is a mosquito-borne infectious disease caused by parasitic protozoans of the genus Plasmodium and transmitted to humans via the bites of infected female Anopheles mos- quitoes. Although progress has been seen in the last decade in the fight against the disease, malaria remains one of the major cause of morbidity and mortality in large areas of the developing world, especially sub-Saharan Africa. The main victims are children under five years of age. The observed reductions are going hand in hand with impressive increases in international funding for malaria prevention, control, and elimination, which have led to tremendous expansion in implementing national malaria control programs (NMCPs). Common interventions include indoor residual spraying (IRS), the use of insecticide treated nets (ITN) and environmental measures such as larval control. Specific targets have been set during the last decade. The Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 6 aims to halve malaria incidence by 2015 as compared to 1990 and to achieve universal ITN coverage and treatment with appropriate antimalarial drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2016 Health Program Health System Strengthening Component
    2011-2016 HEALTH PROGRAM HEALTH SYSTEM STRENGTHENING COMPONENT: QUARTERLY REPORT JULY-SEPTEMBER 2014 November 2014 This report is a deliverable under contract # AID-685-A-11-00002, Health System Strengthening Component (HSS) of the USAID/Senegal Health Program, 2011-2016 The Health System Strengthening Component of the Health Program consists of technical assistance to the Government of Senegal implemented by Abt and financed by USAID under contract # AID-685-A-I I -00002 Submitted to: Babacar Lo USAID DAKAR Abt Associates 1 Immeuble Abdoulaye Seck 1 Rue de Fatick X Bd du Sud 1 Point E1 Dakar www.abtassociates.com HEALTH SYSTEM STRENGTHENING COMPONENT: QUARTERLY REPORT JULY-SEPTEMBER 2014 WARNING The authors' views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. iii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................... v 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................... 7 1.1 SUMMARY 7 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................7 1.3 KEY RESULTS OF THE QUARTER 8 1.4 KEY CHALLENGES 9 2 RESULTS OF THE QUARTER ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Demographics of Senegal: Ethnicity and Religion (By Region and Department in %)
    Appendix 1 Demographics of Senegal: Ethnicity and Religion (By Region and Department in %) ETHNICITY Wolof Pulaar Jola Serer Mandinka Other NATIONAL 42.7 23.7 5.3 14.9 4.2 13.4 Diourbel: 66.7 6.9 0.2 24.8 0.2 1.2 Mbacke 84.9 8.4 0.1 8.4 0.1 1.1 Bambey 57.3 2.9 0.1 38.9 0.1 0.7 Diourbel 53.4 9.4 0.4 34.4 0.5 1.9 Saint-Louis: 30.1 61.3 0.3 0.7 0.0 7.6 Matam 3.9 88.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.0 Podor 5.5 89.8 0.3 0.3 0.0 4.1 Dagana 63.6 25.3 0.7 1.3 0.0 10.4 Ziguinchor: 10.4 15.1 35.5 4.5 13.7 20.8 Ziguinchor 8.2 13.5 34.5 3.4 14.4 26.0 Bignona 1.8 5.2 80.6 1.2 6.1 5.1 Oussouye 4.8 4.7 82.4 3.5 1.5 3.1 Dakar 53.8 18.5 4.7 11.6 2.8 8.6 Fatick 29.9 9.2 0.0 55.1 2.1 3.7 Kaolack 62.4 19.3 0.0 11.8 0.5 6.0 Kolda 3.4 49.5 5.9 0.0 23.6 17.6 Louga 70.1 25.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.4 Tamba 8.8 46.4 0.0 3.0 17.4 24.4 Thies 54.0 10.9 0.7 30.2 0.9 3.3 Continued 232 Appendix 1 Appendix 1 (continued) RELIGION Tijan Murid Khadir Other Christian Traditional Muslim NATIONAL 47.4 30.1 10.9 5.4 4.3 1.9 Diourbel: 9.5 85.3 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.3 Mbacke 4.3 91.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 Bambey 9.8 85.6 2.9 0.6 0.7 0.4 Diourbel 16.0 77.2 4.6 0.7 1.2 0.3 Saint-Louis: 80.2 6.4 8.4 3.7 0.4 0.9 Matam 88.6 2.3 3.0 4.7 0.3 1.0 Podor 93.8 1.9 2.4 0.8 0.0 1.0 Dagana 66.2 11.9 15.8 0.9 0.8 1.1 Ziguinchor: 22.9 4.0 32.0 16.3 17.1 7.7 Ziguinchor 31.2 5.0 17.6 16.2 24.2 5.8 Bignona 17.0 3.3 51.2 18.5 8.2 1.8 Oussouye 14.6 2.5 3.3 6.1 27.7 45.8 Dakar 51.5 23.4 6.9 10.9 6.7 0.7 Fatick 39.6 38.6 12.4 1.2 7.8 0.5 Kaolack 65.3 27.2 4.9 0.9 1.0 0.6 Kolda 52.7 3.6 26.0 11.1 5.0 1.6 Louga 37.3 45.9 15.1 1.2 0.1 0.5 Source:
    [Show full text]
  • Is GAFSP Reaching Small-Scale Food Producers in Senegal?
    Is GAFSP reaching small-scale food producers in Senegal? 1 Introduction: The GAFSP supported PASA Lou-Ma- Kaf in Senegal In Senegal, the proportion of people living in extreme poverty dropped from 55.2% in 2001 to 46.7% in 20111. Poverty remains high in rural areas (57.3%), where the majority of the 13 million Senegalese population lives. The deficit of productive jobs in rural areas is fueling an exodus of young people and women to urban centers both inside the country and abroad. Food insecurity remains high (16% of the population in 20142) and affects primarily farm households and poor families. Although contributing less than 13% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)3, the agricultural sector supports more than half of Senegal’s population. Less than 2% of the cultivated farmland is irrigated4. The livestock sub-sector employs about 3 million people and accounts for about 35% of the GDP in the agricultural sector5. Local grain production can cover only half of basic food needs, and the country imports 70% of its food6, particularly large quantities of white rice. The Food Security Support Project (PASA) in the regions of Louga, Matam and Kaffrine (Lou-Ma-Kaf) is receiving US$40 million from the public sector window of the multi-donor trust fund of the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP). The Senegalese government’s contribution is US$5.8 million. This five-and-a-half-year project (2013-2018) aims to improve rural food security and incomes by facilitating access for small-scale producers, women, and their organizations to rural roads, agricultural and livestock infrastructures, as well as to technologies, services and specially adapted training.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: PAD236 Public Disclosure Authorized INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 52.1 MILLION (US$80 MILLION EQUIVALENT) Public Disclosure Authorized AND A PROPOSED GRANT FROM THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY TRUST FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF US$6 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE AGRIBUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT November 22, 2013 This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Public Disclosure Authorized Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective October 31, 2013 Currency Unit = CFA Francs CFA 482.71 = US$1 US$1 = SDR 0,65017815 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAA Analytic and Advisory Activities AGS Accelerated Growth Strategy AFD French Development Agency AfDB African Development Bank AGEROUTE Works and Road Management Agency/Agence des Travaux et de Gestion des Routes AIDP Agriculture Insurance Development Project ANCAR National Agency for Agricultural and rural Advisory Services/Agence Nationale du Conseil Agricole et Rural ANGMV National Agency for the Great Green Wall/Agence Nationale de la Grande Muraille Verte APIX Private Investment Promotion Agency/Agence de promotion des Investissements et des Grands Travaux ARMP Public Procurement Regulatory Authority ASER Senegalese
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Rural Hunger: the Case of Senegal
    ENDING RURAL HUNGER The case of Senegal October 2017 www.endingruralhunger.org Ibrahima Hathie, Boubacar Seydi, Lamine Samaké, and Souadou Sakho- Jimbira Dr. Ibrahima Hathie is the Research Director at the Initiative Prospective Agricole et Rurale (IPAR) in Senegal. Boubacar Seydi is a statistician at IPAR. Lamine Samaké is a research assistant at IPAR. Souadou Sakho-Jimbira is a senior researcher at IPAR. Author’s note and acknowledgements This report was prepared by Dr. Ibrahima Hathie, Boubacar Seydi, Lamine Samaké, and Souadou Sakho- Jimbira of the Initiative Prospective Agricole et Rurale as part of the Ending Rural Hunger project led by Homi Kharas. The team at the Africa Growth Initiative within the Global Economy and Development program of the Brookings Institution, led by Eyerusalem Siba and comprising Amy Copley, Christina Golubski, Mariama Sow, and Amadou Sy, oversaw the production of the report. Christina Golubski provided design and editorial assistance. John McArthur provided invaluable feedback on the report. Data support was provided by Lorenz Noe, Krista Rasmussen, and Sinead Mowlds. The authors wish to thank Mariama Kesso Sow, Isseu Dieye, Yacor Ndione, Ahmadou Ly, Ndeye Mbayang Kébé and Mayoro Diop for their support in data collection and in interviews with key stakeholders. We are also grateful to many people (civil servants, donors, technical assistance) who have graciously accepted to share their views. This study was supported by a grant from Brookings. This paper reflects the views of the author only and not those of the Africa Growth Initiative. The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Senegal Country Portfolio
    Senegal Country Portfolio Overview: Country program established in 1986. USADF currently U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: ACA (Association manages a portfolio of 18 projects. Total commitment is $2 million. Country Program Coordinator: Mamadou Ba Conseil pour l’Action) Villa No. 8333 Sacre Coeur 1 Ibrahima Yade, Executive Director Country Strategy: The program focuses on marginalized Dakar, Senegal Tel.: + 221 338 69 8100 community groups, particularly projects with value-adding Tel.: +221 33 825 93 80 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] processing in Senegal. Grantee Duration Value Summary Economic Interest Group (GIE) 2013-2017 $153,927 Sector: Agro-Processing (Millet and Corn) Takku Town/City: Yembeul, Dakar 2855-SEN Summary: The project funds will be used to improve the level of the group’s productivity through the building of a production center, increase working capital, and modernize equipment so that the entire group can work daily, meet its production targets, and more efficiently satisfy its orders. GIE Malal Yero Gueye 2013-2017 $182,048 Sector: Food Production (Rice) 2890-SEN Town/City: Richard-Toll, Saint-Louis region Summary: The project funds will be used to improve the level of productivity for GIE Malal Yero Gueye through the rehabilitation of existing land and procurement of a tractor that will help expand the area under production. They will also establish a revolving fund to also purchase paddy directly from out- grower producers, thereby increasing the production levels of the existing rice processing center. Federation of Community 2013-2017 $181,942 Sector: Food Storage (Cereal Bank) Development Associations Town/City: Battal, Diama Thiendou, Keur Mory Ndiaye, Gad Dior, and Darou Nguer, Thies region (Fédération des Associations de Summary: The project funds will be used to construct cereal banks, stock their production, improve Développement Communautaire marketing options, reduce speculation on grains, improved post-harvest losses and improve food (FADEC/SUD) security.
    [Show full text]
  • LEÏDI LABORATORY "Territorial Dynamics and Development
    GASTON BERGER UNIVERSITY LEÏDI LABORATORY "Territorial Dynamics and Development REPORT OF THE RESEARCH COMMITTEE FOR THE REALIZATION OF AN INVENTORY OF DATA AND TOOLS IN THE CADASTRAL SECTOR IN SENEGAL Presented by Mouhamadou Mawloud DIAKHATÉ Full Professor of Universities Laboratory Director October, 2020 CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS INTRODUCTION I/ HISTORY OF THE EVOLUTION OF THE ORGANIZATION OF STATE STRUCTURES II/ INVENTORY OF STAKEHOLDERS AND EXISTING DATA III/ RESPONSIBILITIES AND COMMITMENT OF THE ACTORS IN THE COLLECTION OF CADASTRAL DATA IV/ RELIABLE CADASTRAL DATA AND MONITORING OF ODDS V/ ROADMAP FOR STRENGTHENING THE CADASTRAL ECOSYSTEM V.1 Objectives of strengthening the cadastral ecosystem V.2 Contribution of spatial remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) and statistics to the modernization of the national cadastre V.2.1. Implementation of a multi-purpose cadastre in Senegal V.2.2. Thematic maps V.2.3. 2D and 3D Carto. V.2.4. Statistical modelling V.2.5. Methodology for the elaboration of the comic book V.3 Content of the roadmap V.4. Priority and Roadmap Agenda CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY ITEMS 2 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ANDS : National Agency of Statistics and Demography ArcGIS: Suite of geographic information software developed by Esri ADB: African Development Bank BAGDOC: Office of General Affairs and Documentation BD TOPO: Topographic data bank BLC: Office of Legislation and Litigation PRB: Public Relations Office CAGF: Framework for analysis of land governance CGE: Center for Large Enterprises
    [Show full text]