Thèse De Doctorat ALI ALMOUSSAWI

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thèse De Doctorat ALI ALMOUSSAWI Thèse de Doctorat Mention Sciences écologiques Spécialité Ecologie, Evolution et Biodiversité présentée à l'Ecole Doctorale en Sciences Technologie et Santé (ED 585) de l’Université de Picardie Jules Verne par ALI ALMOUSSAWI pour obtenir le grade de Docteur de l’Université de Picardie Jules Verne Importance relative des processus de dispersion et de recrutement dans la dynamique d’assemblage des communautés végétales en paysage agricole Soutenue le 06 Septembre 2019, après avis de rapporteurs, devant le jury d’examen : Mme Sophie Nadot, Professeur (Université Paris-Sud 11) President me M Estelle Forey, Maître de Conférences HDR (Université du Rouen) Rapporteur M. Michel-Pierre Faucon, Maître de Conférences HDR (UniLaSalle) Rapporteur M. Fréderic Dubois, Professeur (UPJV) Examinateur M. Guillaume Decocq, Professeur (UPJV) Directeur M. Jonathan Lenoir, Chargé de Recherche CNRS-UPJV Co-encadrant PhD Thesis Ecological Sciences Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity Presented for The Doctoral School in Science, Technology and Health (ED 585) Of the University of Picardie Jules Verne By ALI ALMOUSSAWI To obtain the degree of Doctor from the University of Picardie Jules Verne Dispersal limitation vs recruitment limitation in local assembly rules of plant communities within agricultural landscapes Defended on 06 September 2019, after the review of the reviewers and in front of the examination Board: Mme Sophie Nadot, Professor President me M Estelle Forey, Assistant Professor Reviewer M. Michel-Pierre Faucon, Assistant Professor Reviewer M. Fréderic Dubois, Professor Examiner M. Guillaume Decocq, Professor Director M. Jonathan Lenoir, Senior Researcher Co-director This thesis was prepared within the research unit “Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés” EDYSAN, UMR CNRS 7058, 1 rue des Louvels 80037 Amiens Cedex إلى أمي وأبي........ إلى أخوتي حسين وﻻء فاطمة محمد.......... إلى قطعتي قلبي عباس وعلي............ “Rise and rise again and again like the Phoenix from the ashes; until the lambs have become lions.” ― Maitreya Acknowledgements At the end of three astonishingly unforgettable years, I would like to thank everyone who contributed in one way or another to the success of this work. First and foremost, I would like to thank the jury members for accepting to evaluate this work. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my Director, Prof. Guillaume DECOCQ, for giving me the chance to work on this project. Your enthusiasm and encouragement in good times and in bad will always be appreciated. Thank you for inspiring my research and allowing me to grow as a scientist. Had it not been for your patience and those numerous discussions, I would not have been as fortunate to be where I am today. Simply, if it were not for you, I would not have had the chance to embark on this journey and experience the sweet taste of fruitful efforts. In other respects, I would like to express my profound appreciation for my co-director Dr. Jonathan LENOIR, or as I like to call him “BOSS”. I am deeply and eternally grateful for the tremendous amount of time and effort you have put into this project. Although it was never easy working with the perfectionist within you, I am honestly thankful for you forcing me to never accept anything less than whole. Your passion for research and your unwavering vision are truly inspiring, even contagious. With your supervision and guidance, I managed to turn the tide every single time. Your counsel has been the cornerstone I leaned on for support throughout my odyssey. I thank my luck I had the chance to work with you. For Prof. Ahmad KOBEISSI, my co-supervisor and masters coordinator, Thanks for your patience, your listening, your availability and your support without fault. You were an exceptional supervisor and without you, I would not get the chance to be a PhD student. Dr. Déborah CLOSSET-KOPP or the SHERIF ;), the kindest and most caring scientist I had ever met, I am very glad of having unforgettable moments with you being the center of every event. Thank you for your encouragement and unlimited kindness. I would like to thank Dr. Naim BOUSTANY and Dr. Zeinab ASSAGHIR for their continuous support and you were always believing in me. It is a chance for me to gift you my efforts in this report and to express for you my gratitude for being a part of this success. What I have been vainly trying to convey with words does not come close to expressing the amount of admiration I hold for all four of you. I genuinely cannot find enough words to thank you as I must and you deserve. My heartfelt thanks go to Emilie GALLET-MORON-Moron (the kindest person you can ever meet on this planet), and I would like to tell you that you were a symptom of optimism in my life during all my stay at GEP. Fabien SPICHER, or the botanist with no limits and the mobile botanical library, I would like to thank you for all your efforts in helping me during the fieldwork, lab work and analysis. I would like to show a big thank to all the permanent staff, doctoral students, trainees and secretary and to the former colleagues whom I was able to work with during my thesis and who contributed to the good atmosphere that prevails at EDYSAN: Lamine (My brother) thank you for your encouragement and help when I needed it! Thank you for all the discussions, first of all, professionals, who opened up to me many new doors, as well as for our long discussions and debates about different topics. Tarek (or the ARTIST) thank you for launching me in this world of R. Thanks also to my office mates: Olivia; Pedro; Benoit; Camille; Mederic; Vincent; Sabrina; Marine; Aude; and Arnaud. I wish to thank Frédéric BERQUIN for all administrative procedures. I have really bothered you a lot with my questions. Olivier, Hélène, Boris, Sylvie, Jérôme, Frédéric, and Alexandre: thank you all for everything. I would also like to thank all the co-authors of the various projects for their very valuable comments, their motivations and encouragement. I especially want to thank Aurélien, Safaa and Carol. Many thanks to all the other members of the research unit. My sincere thanks are addressed first to Prof. Frédéric DUBOIS (for allowing me to work at the UFR science and allowing me to borrow the screen and for being a member of my thesis committee), and Prof. Arnaud AMELINE (for allowing me to use stereoscopes during seed preparation). Thank you all the members of the EDYSAN research unit who are so numerous and I am not going to name you all, but you will recognize yourselves. During my stay in Amiens, I was also fortunate to make many friends from Amiens and outside France. I am glad I met each and every one of you guys: Abdel-Rahman, Khaled, Johanna, Afaf, Ranim, Douaa, Soukaina, Layal, Ghaya, Maya A, Maya, Rosa, Kareem, Fatima, Rana, Abbass, Walaa, Hussein, Ahmad, Hawraa N., Ihsan, Tarek, Nisrine, Sami, Hiba S., Leila, Zakaria, Hawraa A. Jeanne, Hawraa I., Zeinab, Fayez, Manar, Ali T., Ali N., Ali M. All of you were there since day one, supporting and helping me in every way possible, and thank you for your encouragement, compassion, and the times we spent arguing and discussing ideas, and I hope you all reach what you are aiming for. Louay & Reya I treasure your kindness and the way you care about others, it is truly heart-warming. Hamza, it is said that true friends are never of the same height, which is the case with me and you but be happy that we share the passion for food. This has brought us even closer as friends and guaranteed that we always have something to talk about. Ali J. Thank you for being the brother that I can count on during my whole stay in Amiens, and for being my first guide in every problem I had faced in France. You were the ace in every situation and not just for me but for all the Lebanese students. May God Keep your spirit high and may your wishes (what we share) come true DOCTOR ALI ;). I was also blessed to have friends outside the lab, amazing people with whom I shared countless moments and being more like family than friends: Mohammad A., Ali C, Ali J. Mahmoud, Mohammad R., Majd R. Nassim, Issam, Mohammad N., Khaled, Azad, Assi, Amar H., Alaa M. I am grateful to have you as a cousin and as a BIG brother AMYSM where I fearlessly chased all my BIG dreams knowing that my BIG brother will always look out for me. I will never be able to be a BIG bro to you but the least I can do is start by saying a BIG ‘Thank You’. To the people who never believed in me, who thought I was not good enough to have any chance to be successful without their presence. I have to thank you because proving you wrong has been my greatest incentive. Thanks again for providing me with the challenge I set out to conquer. To my family, the people who never stopped believing in me; thank you for the unconditional love and support. To my grandparents, aunts and uncles with whom I grew up, thank you for instilling in me compassion, forgiveness and the love for others, for making me believe that the best way to predict the future is to create it myself, and that education makes the possibilities endless. Finally, to my parents, brother and my little angel (Loulou), mere words cannot begin to unravel how much you mean to me, but I promise to not let you down and to always be by your side whenever needed.
Recommended publications
  • № 1 2015 End.Indd
    Contents Quinoa as a promising pseudocereal crop for Ukraine S. L. Mosyakin, V. V. Schwartau 3 Breeding and usage of sugar beet cultivars and hybrids resistant to sugar beet nematode Heterodera schachtii L. A. Pylypenko, K. A. Kalatur 12 The importance of agroecology in the process of well-balanced agrosphere formation O. І. Furdуchko, O. S. Demyanуuk 23 Recent data on the causative agent of pale green dwarf (Acholeplasma laidlawii var. granulum incertae sedis) in Ukraine: pathogenicityand virulence factors and host reactions K. S. Korobkova, V. P. Patyka 30 Regulation of nitrogen-carbon interactions in agroecosystems in the forest-steppe zone of Ukraine V. A. Velichko, О. V. Demidenko 35 Soil Spatial Heterogeneity and Systems of Agriculture V. V. Medvedev 50 Detection of antibiotics, active against Bacillus subtilis, in grain and feed O. V. Trufanov, А. M. Kotyk, V. A. Trufanova, О. V. Tereshchenko, О. M. Zhukorskiy 60 Transforming growth factor β1, pituitary-specifi c transcriptional factor 1 and insulin-like growth factor I gene polymorphisms in the population of the Poltava clay chicken breed: association with productive traits R. A. Kulibaba, A. V. Tereshchenko 67 Infl uence of humus acids on mobility and biological availability of iron, zinc and copper A. I. Fateev, D. O. Semenov, K. B. Smirnova, A. M. Shemet 73 © The National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Agricultural Science and Practice, 2015 ВІДКРИТО ПЕРЕДПЛАТУ НА 2015 РІК Національна академія аграрних наук України видає науковий журнал «Agricultural science and practice» У журналі «Agricultural science and practice» публікуються результати фундаментальних і прикладних досліджень з питань ґрунтознавства, землеробства, рослинництва, ветерина- рії, тваринництва, кормовиробництва, генетики, селекції та біотехнології, механізації, агроекології, радіології, меліорації, переробки та зберігання сільськогосподарської про- дукції, економіки, інноваційної діяльності.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Plants of South Norwood Country Park
    Flowering Plants Of South Norwood Country Park Robert Spencer Introduction South Norwood Country Park relative to its size contains a wide range habitats and as a result a diverse range of plants can be found growing on site. Some of these plants are very conspicuous, growing in great abundance and filling the park with splashes of bright colour with a white period in early May largely as a result of the Cow Parsley, this is followed later in the year by a pink period consisting of mainly Willow herbs. Other plants to be observed are common easily recognisable flowers. However there are a great number of plants growing at South Norwood Country Park that are less well-known or harder to spot, and the casual observer would likely be surprised to learn that 363 species of flowering plants have so far been recorded growing in the park though this number includes invasive species and garden escapes. This report is an update of a report made in 2006, and though the site has changed in the intervening years the management and fundamental nature of the park remains the same. Some plants have diminished and some have flourished and the high level of diversity is still present. Many of these plants are important to other wildlife particularly in their relationship to invertebrate pollinators, and some of these important interactions are referenced in this report. With so many species on the plant list there is a restriction on how much information is given for each species, with some particularly rare or previously observed but now absent plants not included though they appear in the index at the back of the report including when they were last observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to the New Flora of Vermont
    Gilman, A.V. Additions to the New Flora of Vermont. Phytoneuron 2016-19: 1–16. Published 3 March 2016. ISSN 2153 733X ADDITIONS TO THE NEW FLORA OF VERMONT ARTHUR V. GILMAN Gilman & Briggs Environmental 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5, Barre, Vermont 05641 [email protected] ABSTRACT Twenty-two species of vascular plants are reported for the state of Vermont, additional to those reported in the recently published New Flora of Vermont. These are Agrimonia parviflora, Althaea officinalis , Aralia elata , Beckmannia syzigachne , Bidens polylepis , Botrychium spathulatum, Carex panicea , Carex rostrata, Eutrochium fistulosum , Ficaria verna, Hypopitys lanuginosa, Juncus conglomeratus, Juncus diffusissimus, Linum striatum, Lipandra polysperma , Matricaria chamomilla, Nabalus racemosus, Pachysandra terminalis, Parthenocissus tricuspidata , Ranunculus auricomus , Rosa arkansana , and Rudbeckia sullivantii. Also new are three varieties: Crataegus irrasa var. irrasa , Crataegus pruinosa var. parvula , and Viola sagittata var. sagittata . Three species that have been reported elsewhere in 2013–2015, Isoetes viridimontana, Naias canadensis , and Solidago brendiae , are also recapitulated. This report and the recently published New Flora of Vermont (Gilman 2015) together summarize knowledge of the vascular flora of Vermont as of this date. The New Flora of Vermont was recently published by The New York Botanical Garden Press (Gilman 2015). It is the first complete accounting of the vascular flora of Vermont since 1969 (Seymour 1969) and adds more than 200 taxa to the then-known flora of the state. However, the manuscript for the New Flora was finalized in spring 2013 and additional species are now known: those that have been observed more recently, that have been recently encountered (or re-discovered) in herbaria, or that were not included because they were under study at the time of finalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae/ Amaranthaceae): Implications for Evolution and Taxonomy
    Fruit and Seed Anatomy of Chenopodium and Related Genera (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae/ Amaranthaceae): Implications for Evolution and Taxonomy Alexander P. Sukhorukov1,2*, Mingli Zhang1,3 1 Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresource in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China, 2 Department of Higher Plants, Biological Faculty, Moscow Lomonosov State University, Moscow, Russia, 3 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Abstract A comparative carpological study of 96 species of all clades formerly considered as the tribe Chenopodieae has been conducted for the first time. The results show important differences in the anatomical structure of the pericarp and seed coat between representatives of terminal clades including Chenopodium s.str.+Chenopodiastrum and the recently recognized genera Blitum, Oxybasis and Dysphania. Within Chenopodium the most significant changes in fruit and seed structure are found in members of C. sect. Skottsbergia. The genera Rhagodia and Einadia differ insignificantly from Chenopodium. The evolution of heterospermy in Chenopodium is discussed. Almost all representatives of the tribe Dysphanieae are clearly separated from other Chenopodioideae on the basis of a diverse set of characteristics, including the small dimensions of the fruits (especially in Australian taxa), their subglobose shape (excl. Teloxys and Suckleya), and peculiarities of the pericarp indumentum. The set of fruit and seed characters evolved within the subfamily Chenopodioideae is described. A recent phylogenetic hypothesis is employed to examine the evolution of three (out of a total of 21) characters, namely seed color, testa-cell protoplast characteristics and embryo orientation. Citation: Sukhorukov AP, Zhang M (2013) Fruit and Seed Anatomy of Chenopodium and Related Genera (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae/Amaranthaceae): Implications for Evolution and Taxonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • VIII 2014.Pdf
    ISSN 2072-8816 Российская академия наук Russian Academy of Sciences Самарский научный центр Samara scientific center Институт экологии Волжского бассейна Institute of ecology of the Volga river basin Тольяттинское отделение Русского ботанического общества Togliatti branch of Russian Botanical society Кафедра ЮНЕСКО Изучение и сохранение UNESCO chair on the Study and conservation биоразнообразия экосистем Волжского бассейна of biodiversity of ecosystems of the Volga basin ФИТОРАЗНООБРАЗИЕ ВОСТОЧНОЙ ЕВРОПЫ / PHYTODIVERSITY OF EASTERN EUROPE 2014 Т. VIII, № 1 Основан в 2006 г. Научный руководитель издательского проекта Scientific Director of the publishing project д.б.н., проф. С.В. Саксонов (Тольятти) Dr. of Biology, Prof. S.V. Saksonov (Togliatti) Главный редактор: к.б.н. С.А. Сенатор (Тольятти) Editor-in-Chief: Cand. of Biology S.A. Senator (Togliatti) Редакционная коллегия Editorial board академик НАН Беларуси, д.б.н., проф. Academician of NAS of Belarus, Dr. of Biology, В.И. Парфёнов (Минск), Prof. V.I. Parfyonov (Minsk), чл.-корр. РАН, д.б.н., проф. Corresponding member of RAS, Dr. of Biology, Г.С. Розенберг (Тольятти), Prof. G.S. Rozenberg (Togliatti), д.б.н., проф. Л.М. Абрамова (Уфа), Dr. of Biology, Prof. L.M. Abramova (Ufa), д.б.н., проф. Р.И. Бурда (Киев), Dr. of Biology, Prof. R.I. Burda (Kyiv), д.б.н., проф. В.Б. Голуб (Тольятти), Dr. of Biology, Prof. V.B. Golub (Togliatti), д.б.н. В.Ю. Нешатаева (Санкт-Петербург), Dr. of Biology V.Y. Neshataeva (Saint-Petersburg), д.б.н. А.В. Щербаков (Москва), Dr. of Biology A.V. Shcherbakov (Moscow), к.б.н. Д.И. Третьяков (Минск) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 BC Conservation Status Rank Review and Changes
    2019 BC Conservation Status Rank Review and Changes Vascular Plants There were 31 vascular plants added to the BC flora, a few native or potentially native species, five native hybrids, one hybrid cultivar, and 17 Exotic species (including European grape and salt-cedar). Amongst the native or potentially native are Kluane cinquefoil (a native species that is not yet ranked), a new false bind-weed (Unknown BC List status due to uncertain provenance), the Columbia River monkey-flower (Unknown status due insufficient data to rank), and a goosefoot with taxonomic uncertainty (Chenopodium incognitum). There were 23 vascular plant taxa removed from the BC Flora. These are no longer considered part of the flora of BC due to re-identifications of herbarium specimens, taxonomic changes, and lack of specimens to adequately document the presence in the province. A total of 107 scientific names were changed involving taxonomic splits and lumps (e.g., Crepis atribarba subspecies, and Lloydia serotina respectively), genus transfers (e.g. Trientalis to Lysimachia, Coeloglossum to Dactylorhiza), and relocations of infraspecific ranks (i.e. from variety to subspecies or subspecies to variety)(Flora of North of America Editorial Committee (1997, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2014, 2015), Jepson e- flora, and variety of primary literature listed below). There were a significant number of provincial conservation status rank changes this year to support the work of the program on the General Status of Species in Canada: 2132 native species were reviewed and 1146 were adjusted. Macrolichens Twenty-two taxonomic and nomenclatural changes were made to the CDC database this year, including eleven additions, ten removals from the lichen list for BC and one name change.
    [Show full text]
  • Amaranthaceae (Formerly Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae)
    A GUIDE TO PIGWEEDS, GOOSEFOOTS, ORACHES AND THEIR RELATIVES IN HAMPSHIRE Issue 2: September 2016 The family Amaranthaceae (formerly Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae) This group of plants, now all included within the one family in the 3rd edition of Stace’s New Flora of the British Isles on the basis of molecular genetics, is one that many people shy away from. With their mostly dull-coloured, small flowers, weedy and sometimes lumpish overall appearance, from a distance they offer few of the visual charms of other families; but close up they can be as attractive, fascinating or even downright weird as orchids or other popular groups. Several genera (particularly the Pigweeds, Goosefoots and Glassworts) offer serious challenges for identification. Characteristics of the family are an absence of stipules; a flower that has no distinction between sepals and petals (and so they are often referred to as tepals); a perianth of 0-5 tepals in a flower; 1-5 stamens; 2-3 styles; and a 1- celled ovary placed above (superior) or embedded at the level of (semi-inferior) the perianth. Inflorescences are densely clustered in many genera. Some genera, such as Amaranthus (Pigweeds) and Atriplex (Oraches), have distinctive bracts subtending the individual flowers, hence often referred to as bracteoles. An extract from Lena Strouwer, 2009, “Field identification of the 50 most common plant families in temperate regions”, available online at www.sci.sdsu.edu/plants/plantsystematics/Identifying_50_major_plant_families.pdf 1 A key to the genera 1 Succulent
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography - Flora of Newfoundland and Labrador
    Bibliography - Flora of Newfoundland and Labrador AAGAARD, S.M.D. 2009. Reticulate evolution in Diphasiastrum (Lycopodiaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden. AAGAARD, S.M.D., J.C. VOGEL, and N. WILKSTRÖM. 2009. Resolving maternal relationships in the clubmoss genus Diphasiastrum (Lycopodiaceae). Taxon 58(3): 835-848. AARSSEN, L.W., I.V. HALL, and K.I.N. JENSEN. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 76. Vicia angustifolia L., V. cracca L., V. sativa L., V. tetrasperma (L.) Schreb., and V. villosa Roth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66: 711-737. ABBE, E.C. 1936. Botanical results of the Grenfell-Forbes Northern Labrador Expedition. Rhodora 38(448): 102-161. ABBE, E.C. 1938. Phytogeographical observations in northernmost Labrador. Spec. Publ. Amer. Geogr. Soc. 22: 217-234. ABBE, E.C. 1955. Vascular plants of the Hamilton River area, Labrador. Contrib. Gray Herb., Harvard Univ. 176: 1-44. ABBOTT, J.R. 2009. Phylogeny of the Polygalaceae and a revision of Badiera. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Florida. 291 pp. ABBOTT, J.R. 2011. Notes on the disintegration of Polygala (Polygalaceae), with four new genera for the flora of North America. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 5(1):125-138. ADAMS, R.P. 2004. The junipers of the world: The genus Juniperus. Trafford Publ., Victoria, BC. ADAMS, R.P. 2008. Juniperus of Canada and the United States: Taxonomy, key and distribution. Phytologia 90: 237-296. AESCHIMANN, D., and G. BOCQUET. 1983. Étude biosystématique du Silene vulgaris s.l. (Caryophyllaceae) dans le domaine alpin. Notes nomenclaturales. Candollea 38: 203-209. AHTI, T. 1959. Studies on the caribou lichen stands of Newfoundland.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNALI DI BOTANICA Ann
    ANNALI DI BOTANICA Ann. Bot. (Roma), 2018, 8: 67–74 Journal homepage: http://annalidibotanica.uniroma1.it STUDIES ON CHENOPODIUM ALBUM S. L. (CHENOPODIACEAE / AMARANTHACEAE S. L.): CHENOPODIUM PEDUNCULARE IAMONICO D.1,*, MOSYAKIN S.L.2 1 Department PDTA, University of Rome Sapienza, 00196 Rome, Italy; 2 M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 01004 Kyiv (Kiev), Ukraine *Corresponding author: Telephone: +390649919368; email: [email protected] (RECEIVED 19 JANUARY 2018; RECEIVED IN REVISED FORM 25 APRIL 2018; ACCEPTED 26 APRIL 2018) ABSTRACT – Chenopodium album s. l. is one of the most taxonomically difficult groups of taxa in the genusChenopodium s. s. due to its high phenotypic variability and possible ancient and current hybridization which led to numerous nomenclatural problems and misapplication of names. Proper application of many names in Chenopodium (especially taxa described in the 18–19th centuries) still remains uncertain. As currently accepted in recent publications, several subspecies can be considered under C. album for the European flora, i.e C. album L. subsp. album, C. album subsp. pedunculare (Bertol.) Arcang., and C. album subsp. borbasii (Murr) Soó. Bertoloni’s C. pedunculare (basionym of C. album subsp. pedunculare) appears still poorly understood taxonomically. The present contribution is based on field surveys, analyses of the relevant literature (protologues included), and examination of specimens preserved in several herbaria. The name C. pedunculare was lectotypified by Dvořák (1984) on a specimen deposited at BOLO. Based on morphology and chorology considerations, that taxon can be recognizes at species rank. For nomenclatural purposes, the names C. concatenatum Thuillier (and sensu Aellen), C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chenopodiaceae)
    Mosyakin, S.L. 2013. New nomenclatural combinations in Blitum , Oxybasis , Chenopodiastrum , and Lipandra (Chenopodiaceae). Phytoneuron 2013-56: 1–8. Published 12 August 2013. ISSN 2153 733X NEW NOMENCLATURAL COMBINATIONS IN BLITUM , OXYBASIS, CHENOPODIASTRUM , AND LIPANDRA (CHENOPODIACEAE) SERGEI L. MOSYAKIN M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2 Tereshchenkivska Street Kiev (Kyiv), 01601 Ukraine [email protected] ABSTRACT Following the recent recognition of several genera segregated from Chenopodium sensu lato (Chenopodiaceae), new nomenclatural combinations are proposed in the genera Blitum L. (sect. Atriplicina (Aellen) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Blitum capitatum L. subsp. hastatum (Rydb.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Blitum × tkalcsicsii (H. Melzer) Mosyakin, comb. nov. = B. bonus-henricus × B. virgatum ), Oxybasis Kar. & Kir. (sect. Pseudoblitum (Hook. f.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; sect. Glauca (Standl.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; sect. Urbica (Standl.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; sect. Thellungia (Aellen) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Oxybasis antarctica (Hook. f.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Oxybasis erosa (R. Br.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Oxybasis glauca (L.) S. Fuentes, Uotila, & Borsch subsp. ambigua (R. Br.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Oxybasis glauca subsp. amurensis (Ignatov) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Oxybasis glauca subsp. salina (Standl.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Oxybasis rubra (L.) S. Fuentes, Uotila, & Borsch var. humilis (Hook.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Oxybasis × schulzeana (Murr) Mosyakin, comb. nov. = O. glauca × O. rubra ), Chenopodiastrum S. Fuentes, Uotila, & Borsch (sect. Grossefoveata (Mosyakin) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Chenopodiastrum fasciculosum (Aellen) Mosyakin, comb. nov.; Chenopodiastrum fasciculosum var. schimperi (Asch.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.), and Lipandra (Lipandra polysperma (L.) S. Fuentes, Uotila, & Borsch var. acutifolia (Sm.) Mosyakin, comb. nov.). The name × Lipastrum Mosyakin is proposed for intergeneric hybrids Chenopodiastrum × Lipandra , as well as the new combination × Lipastrum perhybridum (Ponert) Mosyakin, comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Chenopodium Sensu Lato Nella Flora Italiana 85
    INFORMATORE BOTANICO ITALIANO, 45 (1) 83-88, 2013 83 Chenopodium sensu lato (Chenopodiaceae, Chenopodioideae) nella flora vascolare italiana: chiave analitica dei generi D. IAMONICO ABSTRACT – Chenopodium sensu lato (Chenopodiaceae, Chenopodiaceae) in the Italian vascular flora: analytical key of the genera – Recent molecular studies clearly show that the genus Chenopodium L. is not monophyletic and six inde- pendent lineages resulted. Among the ten genera recognized, seven (Blitum L., Chenopodium L., Chenopodiastrum S.Fuentes, Uotila & Borsch, Dysphania R.Br., Lipandra Moq., Oxybasis Ker. & Kir. and Teloxys Moq.) are included in the Italian flora. With the aim to favour a correct identification of the taxa, we here propose an analytic key and detailed descriptions of the seven genera. Key words: Anserineae, Atripliceae, Blitum, Chenopodiastrum, Dysphania, Dysphanieae, Italy, Lipandra, Oxybasis, Teloxys Ricevuto il 15 Gennaio 2013 Accettato il 12 Maggio 2013 INTRODUZIONE Il genere Chenopodium L. (Chenopodiaceae Vent., viene confermata l’autonomia di Dysphania R.Br. Chenopodioideae Burnett), nella sua formulazione [come già supposto da MOSYAKIN, CLEMANTS (2002, tradizionale, comprende circa 150 specie, molte delle 2008)] e Teloxys Moq. (KADEREIT et al., 2010), men- quali ad ampia distribuzione, alcune da considerare tre nelle Anserineae e nelle Atripliceae sono resuscita- esotiche (FUENTES-BAZAN et al., 2012a). ti i generi Blitum L., Lipandra Moq. e Oxybasis Kar. La storia nomenclaturale di questo taxon è comples- & Kir., e descritto Chenopodiastrum S.Fuentes, sa1 e vari autori hanno proposto differenti classifica- Uotila & Borsch. zioni infrageneriche. Il primo studio comprensivo si Riguardo all’Italia, PIGNATTI (1982) e CONTI et al. deve ad AELLEN (1960-61), che riconobbe tredici (2005, 2007) accettano il solo genere Chenopodium, sezioni.
    [Show full text]
  • P. Angelini, E. Bricchi, D. Gigante, S. Poponessi, A. Spina & R
    Fl. Medit. 24: 247-272 doi: 10.7320/FlMedit24.247 Version of Record published online on 30 December 2014 P. Angelini, E. Bricchi, D. Gigante, S. Poponessi, A. Spina & R. Venanzoni Pollen morphology of some species of Amaranthaceae s. lat. common in Italy Abstract Angelini, P., Bricchi, E., Gigante, D., Poponessi, S., Spina, A. & Venanzoni, R.: Pollen mor- phology of some species of Amaranthaceae s. lat. common in Italy. — Fl. Medit. 24: 247-272. 2014. — ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online. Comparative studies on the pollen grains biometry and morphology of the most common species of Amaranthaceae s. lat. (incl. Chenopodiaceae) relieved in the Italian territory were carried out by Light Microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope in order to compare simi- larities and differences among them. Many pollen characters like diameter, volume, exine thick- ness, number of pores, pore density, interpore distance, pore size were considered and analyzed from statistical points of view. Fisher’s Least Significant Difference Test allowed clustering of groups and ordination analysis of taxa. Pollen analysis does not allow easy distinction of the pollen grains of the considered taxa. However, in spite of the many similarities shared by the two groups, some morphological and biometrical traits still allow the distinction of some taxa: interpore distance, exine thickness and above all microechinae density on pollen surface. These spinulous processes are more densely arranged on pollen from species of Amaranthus than from those formerly referred to Chenopodiaceae. The results obtained support the inclusion of the former Chenopodiaceae into Amaranthaceae. Key words: Chenopodiaceae, biometry, SEM, taxonomy. Introduction Chenopodiaceae Vent.
    [Show full text]