Approved April 17, 2018 1 California Library Services Board Meeting 2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 Approved April 17, 2018 2 California Library Services Board Meeting 3 October 17, 2017 4 5 California State Capitol 6 Room 2040 7 Sacramento, CA 8 9 Welcome and Introductions 10 President Bernardo called the California Library Services Board meeting to order on 11 October 17, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. 12 Board Members Present: Anne Bernardo, Brandy Buenafe, Gary Christmas, Aleita 13 Huguenin, Florante Ibanez, Paymaneh Maghsoudi, Peter Mindnich, Elizabeth Murguia, 14 Eric Schockman, Sandra Tauler, and Connie Williams. 15 California State Library Staff Present: State Librarian Greg Lucas, Deputy State 16 Librarian Narinder Sufi, Natalie Cole, Janet Coles, Wendy Hopkins, Lena Pham, Monica 17 Rivas, Annly Roman, and Mark Webster. 18 Adoption of Agenda 19 It was moved, seconded (Maghsoudi/Ibanez) and carried 20 unanimously that the California Library Services Board adopts the 21 agenda of the October 17, 2017 meeting. 22 23 Approval of April 2017 Board Minutes 24 It was moved, seconded (Maghsoudi/Ibanez) and carried 25 unanimously that the California Library Services Board approves the 26 draft minutes of the April 25, 2017 meeting. 27 Board Resolutions 28 It was moved, seconded (Schockman/Ibanez) and carried 29 unanimously that the California Library Services Board adopts 30 California Library Services Board Resolution 2017-02 for Penny 31 Kastanis (Attached as Exhibit A). 32 It was moved, seconded (Ibanez/Tauler) and carried unanimously 33 that the California Library Services Board adopts California Library 34 Services Board Resolution 2017-03 for Gregory McGinity (Attached 35 as Exhibit B). 1 It was moved, seconded (Murguia/Maghsoudi) and carried 2 unanimously that the California Library Services Board adopts 3 California Library Services Board Resolution 2017-04 for Dr. Kevin 4 Starr (Attached as Exhibit C). 5 Election of Board Officers 6 Member Williams reported that the Nominating Committee asked which Board 7 members would be interested in running for President and Vice-President. Anne 8 Bernardo and Paymaneh Maghsoudi agreed to run. An email Board election ballot was 9 sent to all Board members. Based on those ballots the Nominating Committee put 10 forward Anne Bernardo for President and Paymaneh Maghsoudi for Vice President. 11 President Bernardo called for nominations from the floor. There were none. 12 It was moved, seconded (Williams/Ibanez) and carried unanimously 13 that the California Library Services Board elects Anne Bernardo as 14 President of the California Library Services Board for the year 2018. 15 16 It was moved, seconded (Williams/Ibanez) and carried unanimously 17 that the California Library Services Board elects Paymaneh 18 Maghsoudi as Vice-President of the California Library Services 19 Board for the year 2018. 20 21 Board Meeting Date for Spring 2018 22 Annly Roman reported that the Board had already discussed meeting in April, in 23 person, in Sacramento. Member Ibanez requested to include the Joint Conference of 24 Librarians of Color in Albuquerque, New Mexico, September 26-30 to the 2018 events 25 calendar. Member Williams requested adding the California School Libraries 26 Association Conference on February 1-4 at the Tenaya Lodge in Yosemite. 27 Roman asked when the Board would like to hold their fall meeting and would they 28 prefer a conference call or meeting in-person. Member Schockman said that he would 29 prefer an in-person meeting at the end of September or early October. Member Buenafe 30 said she preferred that time-period but suggested a teleconference. All other members 31 indicated they preferred an in-person meeting. 32 REPORTS TO THE BOARD 33 Board President’s Report 34 President Bernardo reported that she ended her terms as a member of the 35 Legislative Committee for the Council of California County Law Librarians and as the 2 1 County Law Libraries’ liaison on the Executive Committee of the Law Practice 2 Management and Technology section of the State Bar of California. 3 She was working on developing a “Lawyers in the Library” program at her library and 4 expanding that program throughout other colleague libraries in the county. 5 Board Vice-President’s Report 6 Vice-President Maghsoudi said that she had been working on a ballot measure for 7 the construction and remodel of their central library. 8 Chief Executive Officer’s Report 9 State Librarian Lucas reported that the State Library had added a new Deputy State 10 Librarian, Narinder Sufi. 11 The state budget, approved in June, provided $3 million in one-time funding for 12 career online high school, which allowed people to get a high school diploma online. 13 The program was administered by libraries and 44 or 45 library jurisdictions already 14 participated. The intent was to spend the funds over a three year period on about 2500 15 seats. 16 In California there had been an 88% completion rate. Part of that high success rate 17 was an up-front assessment to determine if prospective participants had the dedication, 18 work ethic, etc. to complete the program since if a participant does not complete the 19 program that scholarship could not be reused. $50,000 would go to the company that 20 created the program to conduct intake and assessment. 21 Under the existing program, each library that received a scholarship had to provide 22 funding for an additional scholarship, so the program had the potential to help 5000 23 people. 24 State Librarian Lucas reported that the State Library also received $3 million in one- 25 time funding, to be spent over three years, for the California Civil Liberties Education 26 Program. The original program was centered on Japanese internment. New language 27 was added to the program statute that allowed consideration of projects that could also 28 address other violations of civil liberties. Lucas reported that staff would probably 29 request program ideas in mid-November. 3 1 Member Schockman asked if the State Library could take some of the Civil Liberties 2 Education Program money and examine the roll of sanctuary cities in California as a 3 civil liberties issue. State Librarian Lucas stated that the past program had allowed 4 potential grantees to present ideas and State Library staff assessed the proposals to 5 see which fit within the law. Lucas stated that there had been some conversations; 6 particularly by the Assemblyman who carried the bill, about channeling larger chunks of 7 the funding into bigger projects. For example, in 2017 the State Library had allocated 8 half of the one-time grant money for projects that had budgets of $100,000 or higher. 9 One of them was a KCET media campaign to talk about all sorts of civil liberties 10 violations. Lucas stated he someone could put in a similar grant proposal dealing with 11 the sanctuary city issue. 12 State Librarian Lucas stated that $3 million in on-going public education funding to 13 provide online resources (databases) to the state’s public school kids has also been 14 included. California was the only state in the Country not to offer some sort of a state 15 sponsored suite of online content for local districts. The State Library was unsure if $3 16 million was enough for a state the size of California. 17 Lucas reported that he had involved Member Williams in the process and had done 18 some research for them into other states’ processes. He hoped there would be no 19 objections to Member Williams represent the Board on the working group that would be 20 created to make decisions on how the $3 million was spent due to her expertise in 21 education. The library had been working with the education community to put together 22 an RFP. One of the stipulations Lucas wanted included in the RFP was the databases 23 be available to public libraries so kids doing their homework at the library could access 24 the same databases after school. 25 The State Library received funds to upgrade its digital asset management system. 26 Through that upgrade the library added the Rosetta digital preservation repository. State 27 Librarian Lucas reported that it would take about a year to get that up and running. 28 Member Schockman stated that, since CLSA budgets originated from the 29 Governor’s office and the Department of Finance, he was interested in the Board 30 interviewing the candidates for Governor. He felt they needed to look ahead as a 4 1 community and assess who would continue helping fulfill the mandate for libraries in 2 California. 3 Member Buenafe said that John Chiang would be the keynote speaker at the 4 California Library Association conference in May so librarians would be able to get a 5 feel for his position. Member Schockman said that while the Board was not political they 6 each had their circles of influence and he wondered how they could go about vetting the 7 best choice going forward. He felt the next Governor had a big role to play in libraries 8 and he hoped the Board would continue to monitor that race 9 Lighting up Libraries: Broadband Update report 10 Natalie Cole reported that the project goal was to bring high-speed broadband to all 11 California public libraries by connecting them to the California Research and Education 12 Network (CalREN), a statewide, high-speed, high-bandwidth network, managed by the 13 Corporation for Education Network Initiative in California (CENIC). 14 Cole reported that the project was going very well. 139 of California’s 184 15 jurisdictions were connected or in the process of connecting and 110 of those were fully 16 connected, including 100% of all the libraries that joined in year one and 33 of the 17 libraries that joined in year two.