Forestry Best Forest Service Intermountain Management Practices: Research Station General Technical Report INT-GTR-339 Compilation of Research October 1996 on Their Effectiveness

Kathleen A. Seyedbagheri The Author Wise, Jay O'Laughlin, and George Belt of the University of ldaho was appreciated. Finally, I would like to thank all those Kathleen A. Seyedbagheri is a Hydrologist at the Intermoun-. who offered personal and professional support, and the many tain Research Station's Forestry Sciences Laboratory in Boise, contacts in government, industry, and academia who shared ID. She attended Boise State University, the University of Notre their time and expertise. Dame, and Utah State University, and holds bachelor's de- grees in anthropology, mathematics, and watershed science. She received an interdisciplinary master's degree in environ- Contents mental studies in 1994. She served as a forestry aide, forestry Page technician, and hydrologic technician at the Boise Laboratory Introduction ...... 1 between 1974 and 1980, and has been in her present position Background and Need ...... 3 since 1980. The Best Management Practices Project ...... 3 Format ...... 4 Rule 3. Timber Harvesting...... 5 Research Summary Rule 3.c. Soil Protection ...... 7 A search was conducted for quantitative ldaho research Research Results by Best Management results on the effectiveness of the ldaho Forest Practices Act Practice ...... 9 rules and regulations pertaining to timber harvest and forest Rule 3.d. Location of Landings, Skid Trails, and Fire Trails 17 road construction and maintenance. These rules and regula- ...... tions are designated as the "best management practices" for Research Results by Best Management Practice 17 the prevention of nonpoint source pollution from silviculture ...... under provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act. For each Rule 3.e. Drainage Systems ...... 18 practice, the relevant research results are summarized; more Research Results by Best Management general summaries for related groups of practices are also Practice ...... 18 20 provided. Rule 3.f. Treatment of Waste Materials ...... Research Results by Best Management Practice ...... 21 Rule 3.9. Stream Protection ...... 22 Research Results by Best Management I would like to thank my cooperators at the ldaho Division of Practice ...... 22 Environmental Quality (DEQ): Geoff Harvey, Steve Bauer, Rule 3.h. Maintenance of Productivity and Donna Rodman, and Bob Steed. Michael Mclntyre of the Related Values ...... 24 Division of Environmental Quality took special interest in the Research Results by Best Management project; his suggestions and time were greatly appreciated. Practice ...... 24 Special thanks go to my supervisors at the lntermountain Rule 4. Road Construction and Maintenance ...... 27 Research Station: Walt Megahan, Jack King, and Jim Clayton, Rule 4.b. Road Specifications and Plans ...... 29 for sharing their extensive knowledge of "best management Research Results by Best Management practices" research and for providing their support during this Practice ...... 33 project. Rule 4.c. Road Construction ...... 46 I am particularly grateful to Dannielle Treadwell of the Inter- Research Results by Best Management mountain Research Station for her cheerful assistance in many Practice ...... 50 of the more tedious aspects of the effort. The Forest Service's Rule 4.d. Road Maintenance ...... 65 FS INFO-Intermountainlibrary system in Ogden, UT, and the Research Results by Best Management University of ldaho library in Moscow were of great help locating Practice ...... 68 copies of publications. Iwould also like to thank Jim Colla of the General Erosion Research Summary ...... 77' ldaho Department of Lands for providing information on best References ...... 85 management practices interpretation.The cooperation of Carla

The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service.

Intermountain Research Station 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 Idaho Forestry Best Management Practices: Introduction Compilation of Research on Their Effectiveness I Kathleen A. Seyedbagheri

Rule 3. Timber Harvesting I

Rule 4. Road Construction and Maintenance I

General Erosion Research Summary I

References I Introduction I Idaho Forestry Best Management Practices: Compilation of Research on heir Effectiveness Kathleen A. Seyedbagheri

Background and Need Section 208 of the Federal Clean Water Act. This plan identified the rules and regulations associated with In 1972, Section 208 of the Federal Clean Water Act the Idaho Forest Practices Act, with recommended Amendments established the regulatory framework modifications, as the approved silvicultural BMP's. for nonpoint source pollution control through use of The Idaho Division of Environmental Quality is del- "best management practices" (BMPs). The responsi- egated authority to implement the Section 208 re- bility for developing BMP's was delegated to the States. quirements, with primary responsibility for evaluat- Best management practices are defined in the Idaho ing whether the BMP's adequately protect beneficial Water Quality Standards and Wastewater Treatment uses. The Idaho Department of Lands is the desig- Requirements (Idaho Administrative Procedures Act nated management agency for State and private lands. 16.01.2003,01) as "a practice or combination of prac- The Forest Service and the U.S. Department of the tices determined by the Department [of Health and Interior, Bureau of Land Management are the desig- Welfare] to be the most effective and practicable means nated management agencies for Federal lands. In of preventing or reducing the amount of pollution 1980, the Idaho Water Quality Standards were generated by nonpoint sources" (Idaho Department of amended to identify the Forest PracticesrAct rules and Health and Welfare 1989). regulations as the silviculturd BMP's for Idaho (Idaho Idaho was among the first five States to adopt a Department of Health and Welfare 1985,1989). comprehensive modern forest practices act in 1974 Although Idaho had regulated forest practices (Henly and Ellefson 1986). The act's purpose was to through the Forest PracticesAct rules and regulations provide authority for rules "...designed to assure the since 1976, and although much research had been continuous growing and harvesting of tree species and done in Idaho related to the effectiveness of various to protect and maintain the forest soil, air, and water BMP's, this research had never been assembled. The resources, and wildlife and aquatic habitat" (Idaho Division of Environmental Quality entered into Col- Forest Practices Act, Title 38, Chapter 13, Idaho lection Agreement INT-9084CA with the Forest Ser- Code). Regulated forest practices include timber har- vice's IntermountainResearch Station in Boise to locate vest, road construction and maintenance, reforesta- and assemble the available Idaho researchinformation; tion, use of chemicals, and slash management. this report is based on the results of that project. Rules and regulations (Idaho Administrative Proce- dures Act 20.15) are drafted by a Forest Practices Advisory Committee consisting of eight members rep- The Best Management Practices resenting forest land or timber owners, timber opera- Project tors, fisheries biologists, and informed citizens. Ex- officiomembers include representatives of the Idaho According to the agreement, only quantitative re- Division of Environmental Quality, the U.S. Depart- search data collected in Idaho were to be used, and ment of Agriculture, Forest Service, the Idaho Farm only BMP's inRules 3 and4 (TimberHarvest andRoad Bureau, nonindustrial forest landowners, environ- Construction/Maintenance) were tobe evaluated. This mental groups, and resource consultants. Executive was solely a compilation of existing research, not a authority over the rules and regulations is held by the new research study. The requirement that only Idaho Idaho Board of Land Commissioners, which includes data were to be used had advantages and drawbacks. the Governor, attorney general, secretary of state, The advantages were in limiting the project's scope state auditor, and superintendent of public instruc- and in making sure the data had direct applicability. tion. Rules and regulations are reviewed yearly and The disadvantage was that a great deal of research changes are made as necessary. The first set of rules done in other States was automatically eliminated and regulations was issued in 1976. from consideration. The Idaho Forest Practices Water Quality Manage- The forest practice water quality BMP's in RuIes 3 ment Plan was completed in 1979 in accordance with and 4 were subdivided into individual components to the extent possible. A search for Idaho research re- Forest Practices Act Rules and Regulations; refer to sults on these individual BMP7swas conducted. This the Rules and Regulations for exact wording. included literature searches as well as personhl con- More recent versions of the Rules and Regulations tacts with individuals representing State and Federal (May 1992) included a few rules (regarding culvert agencies, universities, private industry, and others. size and winter operations)that were not included in A bibliography of potentially useful references was this report, they were not promulgated when the established. References in the bibliography (including literature searches were conducted. Other rules may literature citations) were screened for applicability. have been added since that time or may be addedin the Generally, research measurements onsite or at a nearby future. For the most part, however, the rules remained downstream point were required. Although instream constant over the course ofthis project. Insertion ofthe monitoring studies are useful, they seldom provide a culvert size rule resulted in a renumbering oftwo rules direct measure of the effectiveness of a particular following it (stream crossings and reuse of existing BMP, due to complex channel processes and cumula- roads). The old numbering system is used in this tive effects. For each individual BMPlistedunder each report, these rules are designated 4.b.vi. and 4.b.vii., subrule, the information relevant to that BMP was respectively. The winter operations rules were added extracted from the references and included in the at the end of the road maintenance section, and no report. renumbering of old rules was involved. Although nei- The literature searches and interviews revealed ther culvert size nor winter operations were included that little BMP effectiveness research had been done in the literature search, I do not recall seeing any in Idaho with the exception of the work done by the Idaho research on these topics. Intermountain Research Station. (The Station has For each BMP, all research studies considered rel- done research on the effects of various logging and evant to it are listed in chronological order (and alpha- road construction techniques since the 1950's.) betically by author within years). The authors and Fewer than 100 references that actually give quan- date are listed first, followed by the study site location. titative effectiveness data on specific BMP's were Background information on the study and relevant found; the majority of these were based on Intermoun- research results are summarized. Page numbers are tain Research Station data. Many BMP7s have not given. Although this is somewhat of a departure from been researched at all in Idaho. Many studies had the usual scientific reporting style, I felt that this important implications for various BMP's, but did not format would be most useful in a reference context. provide quantitative effectiveness data. For each BMP, Following all the listing of research studies for an this report gives effectiveness data when available, individual BMP, cross-referencesmay be provided. At and may also give relevant information from other the beginning of each subrule (Rule 3.c., Rule 3.d., research studies.This report includes both English etc.), a summary of the section is provided. and metric units of measure, depending on the units used in the original research. General Erosion Research Summary The first draft of this report was completed in July 1992. Therefore, relevant research reports written in The most common cross-reference is to the General 1992 or afterward are generally not included in this Erosion Research Summary. This section follows the report. BMP summaries. The research studies summarized there have implications for one or more of the BMP's, but may not address any particular BMP directly. Format Parts of the information presented there, or other information from the same reference, may also appear BMP Summaries under specific BMP's. The information in this section Individual BMP's from Rules 3 and 4 of the April generally addresses general erosion processes, time 1990 Rules and Regulations are listed sequentially in trends, or seasonal trends. Because this section was the report. Each is identified by its subrule designa- not anticipated during the literature search, only tion within the rules and regulations (for example, general information from references that met the Rule 4.c.vii.i). These designations are not unique, be- original screening criteria is included. cause several BMP's might be listed under a given subde.Therefore, each BMP was also assigned allnique References sequential number to facilitate cross-referencing. These The last section of the report lists complete refer- numbers have no significance outside this report. The ences for all citations. When applicable, the BMP's wording of the BMP's is not taken verbatim from the where the reference was cited are listed. Rule 3. Timber Harvesting Rule 3.c. Soil Protection Research in the Creek Study Area in the Middle Fork of the drainage evaluated Nine BMP's (1through 9) were evaluated. BMP 1is surface erosion associated with helicopter logging and general rule 3.c.: "For each harvesting operation, se- broadcast burning (Clayton 1981; Megahan 1987; lect the logging method and type of equipment adapted Megahan and others 1995). Clayton (1981, p. 6) re- to the given slope, landscape, and soil properties in ported that accelerated erosion in the first 2 years order to minimize erosion." after logging was limited to 2 percent of the cutting The remaining BMP's are more specific, and deal unit area. He estimated that 40 to 60 percent of the with six major concepts: erosion volumes of 6.0 and 4.0 tons per acre in the first Choice of yarding system, specifically, ground and second years (respectively)were due to mechani- versus aerial yarding (BMP's 2 and 3); cal associated with logging (pp. 5-6). The Skid trail gradient (BMP 4); total erosion volumes represented an increase over Skid trail width (BMP 5); natural erosion of about one order of magnitude (p. 6). Number of skid trails (BMP 6); Megahan and others (1995)reported accelerated sedi- Tractor size (BMP 7); mentation (averaging 97 percent) at the watershed Uphill versus downhill cable yarding (BMP 8) and mouth persisting for 10 years after treatment. How- downhill yarding techniques (BMP 9). ever, this increase was primarily attributed to the effects of broadcast burning on the harsh south aspect Idaho Batholith site. Ground Skidding Versus Aerial Yarding Soil disturbance is an indicator of the potential for In addition to yarding method, BMP's 2 and 3 also surface erosion. However, soil disturbance is also address soil properties (stability, saturation, ease of considered beneficial for regeneration under compaction, and erosion potential), slope gradient some circumstances. Six studies investigated soil dis- (less than or greater than 45 percent), and proximity turbance associated with various yarding systems. to streams. Tractor and tractor-jammer units in the South Fork Twenty references were found that address direct or drainage had 88 percent of transect indirect impacts for different yarding systems. Of points disturbed, and 40 percent of the points had bare these, only one (Carlton and others 1982) actually soil (Krassel Ranger District 1983, p. 9). tested for ground skiddingversus aerial yarding. This In the Silver Creek Study Area, Clayton (1990, p. 3) study found no significant difference in onsite surface reported soil displacement on 33.5 and 28.5 percent of erosion between skyline- and tractor- logged areas, or the total area ofunits logged with crawler tractors and even between logged and unlogged areas in the Gospel rubber-tired skidders, respectively. Helicopter log- Hump area near Grangeville (p. 18). The percentage of ging in the study area caused soil mixing on less than bare ground was the best predictor of surface erosion 3 percent of the cutting unit area (Clayton 1981, p. 6). on logged and unlogged areas, regardless of yarding Leverick (1980, pp. 91-94) and Rummer (1982, p. method (p. 23). 107) evaluated mineral soil exposure associated with Seven other references addressed surface erosion use of a rubber-tired miniskidder in the University of associated with various yarding systems. Arnold and Idaho Experimental Forest near Moscow. In both Lundeen (1968) evaluated skid trail erosion in the studies, soil was exposed on about 12 percent of the drainage. The estimated area. Bellito's research in the same forest (1985, pp. average annual erosion depth for 5 years after crawler 39-41,46,49,69) found that deep soil disturbance was tractor logging was 0.1 foot (p. 138). McGreer (1981) generally limited to the corridors for both the KoIler measured 1-year erosion rates on skid trails near the (skyline) and KWIK (jammer or high lead) yarding town of Headquarters. The values varied from 0.003 to systems. He felt erosion potential was greater on the 0.583 inches, depending on exposure of subsoil, cover KWIK units due to a greater number of corridors; provided by litter or slash, and skid trail gradient (p. 9). disturbance due to the Koller system could be con- No significant difference in onsite surface erosion trolled to accommodate natural regeneration. was found between skyline and jammer systems in Mass erosion due to yarding systems is less of a research reported by Packer (1966, p. 695) and by concern than is surface erosion. However, a general Megahan and Kidd (1972b, p. 139).Megahan and Kidd statement in one publication could be interpreted to noted, however, that the skyline system in this study address this issue. Based on a survey of landslides in was not used under optimal conditions. Each logging the Middle Fork Payette River and on the Clearwater system increased sedimentation in ephemeral drain- National Forest, Megahan and others (1979, p. 132) ages by 0.6 times natural rates over a 7-year period recommended that logging methods minimize dis- (Megahan and Kidd 1972b, p. 140). turbance to the understory to reduce mass erosion frequency. Soil compaction may decrease productivity or in- Froehlich and others (1985, pp. 1016-1017) showed crease erosion. Seven studies were found that evalu- significant and long-lasting compaction associated ated compaction effects ofvarious yarding systems. In with ground skidding on volcanic and granitic soils the University of Idaho Experimental Forest Bellito near McCall, for periods ranging from 0 to 25 years (1985, pp. 36,46-47, 59) found minimal or no signifi- after logging and for soil depths from 5.1 to 30.5 cant compaction associated with cable logging (Koller centimeters. Initial compaction was about twice as or KWIK yarders) in dry weather. However, in a much on volcanic soils; recovery rates were similar on shelterwood cut logged during wet weather with the the two soil types. KWIK ground lead (double drum jammer configura- The most important consideration in the choice of tion), 21 percent of the area was compacted (a bulk yarding system may be the road system required for density increase of 0.12 grams per cubic centimeter in support. Several papers addressed the indirect effects the corridors), and productivity losses could be ex- related to supporting road systems. Packer (1966, p. pected. The Koller skyline did not cause compaction in 695) and Megahan and Kidd (197213, p. 140) reported wet weather logging except when the skyline cable that roads supporting jammer logging resulted in was not high enough above the slope to keep the logs much higher total erosion rates from a jammer-logged from dragging on the ground. A single drum jammer watershed than &om a skyline-logged watershed with near the town of Smith's Ferry resulted in significant no roads. Kidd and Kochenderfer (1973) noted that compaction on the disturbed areas, with a bulk density jammers required parallel roads every 200 to 400 feet, increase of 0.29 grams per cubic centimeter or 37.6 the correspondingfigure for mobile spars for skyline or percent. Reduced productivity was expected (Bellito high lead logging was 1,500 to 2,000 feet. Burroughs 1985, p. 38). and others (1972, p. 11) reported jammer densities In the South Fork Salmon River drainage, an aver- exceeding 10linear miles per square mile, and stressed age of 40 percent of sampling points on tractor and the critical need to provide proper drainage for the tractor-jammer logged units appeared to be compacted. overland flow and subsurface seepage intercepted by The compacted sites showed a 26 percent increase in the roads. bulk density, with some loss of productivity expected Megahan (1988, p. 337) summarized existing re- (Krassel Ranger District 1983, p. 9). search to compare the percent of area in roads for Clayton (1990, pp. 3-4) measured bulk density various logging systems. The percent of the area in changes associated with crawler tractors and rubber- roads ranged from 2.6 to 3.9 percent for skyline log- tired skidders operating in the Silver Creek Study ging, from 1.0 to 4.3 percent for tractor logging, and Area near Crouch. He found significant increases in from 25 to 30 percent for jammer logging. Hartsog and bulk density, ranging from 15 to 29 percent, on all Gonsior (1973, p. 13) observed that tractor and jam- main and secondary skid trails; differences between mer skidding can cause disturbance and damage to the two skidder types were not significant. Productiv- road prism components, (cutslope, fillslope, tread, and ity losses due to compaction were expected on at least ditch), and prevent correct functioning of the road two of the three cutting units sampled. A landing in drainage system. one of the units showed a 32 percent increase in bulk density. Skid Trail Gradient Lenhard (1978, pp. 10,13)found significant changes Best management practice 4 says that skid trail in bulk density (14 to 34 percent) associated with 4 to gradient should be limited to a maximum of 30 percent 32 passes of a rubber-tired skidder on volcanic-ash on geologically unstable, saturated, highly erodible, or influenced soils near Potlatch; one to two passes did easily compacted soils. Two Idaho studies evaluated not result in statistically significant changes. skid trail gradient on three soil types: granitic, basalt, Leverick (1980, pp. xv, 91) and Rummer (1982, pp. and volcanic ash cap. McGreer (1981, p. 6) measured 64, 83, 105) assessed the impacts of rubber-tired l-year surface erosion rates on skid trail plots near miniskidders operating in the University of Idaho Headquarters. For comparable plots, increases in slope Experimental Forest. Three of four stands had signifi- from 15percent to 40 or 45 percent increased erosion. cant increases in bulk density on skid trails. However, At the steeper gradients, erosion increased by factors the skid trails covered only 5 to 7 percent of the stand of 1.2 for the ash-with-litter plots, 1.7 for the ash- area; compaction was limited to the upper 6 inches of without-litter plots, and 3.7 for exposed subsoil plots. the soil profile; the bulk density values were in the However, the effects of the soils, litter, and slash lower half of the critical range, or that range of esti- variables were much greater than those of slope. mated threshold values for root growth inhibition. In Kidd's study on four sites in west-central Idaho Therefore, productivity losses were expected to be (1963, pp. 4-5) slope gradient class (20 to 30,40 to 50, minimal. or 60 to 70 percent) was not sigzllficant in the analysis of variance of quantitative erosion data. However, the areas averaged 34 acres per square mile in skid trails interaction of soil (basalt or granitic) and slope gradi- and 19 acres per square mile in haul roads for large ent was significantin analysis of qualitative ratings of tractors (D-8),compared to 17 acres per square mile in erosion control structure effectiveness. Kidd (1963, p. skid trails and 33 acres per square mile in haul roads 6) recommended spacing erosion control structures for small tractors (D-4). The relationships between more closely as skid trail gradient increased. Kidd's road area and skid trail area for the two tractor sizes study (1963, pp. 4-5) showed that more skid trail varied among silvicultural systems; tractor size ef- erosion occurred in ravines than on hillsides, and that fects were not apparent for group selection but were skid trail erosion was greater on soils derived from for stem selection. granite than on those derived from basalt. Leverick (1980, p. 97) and Rurnmer (1982) tested rubber-tired miniskidders in the University of Idaho Skid Trail Width and Number of Skid Trails Experimental Forest. The Case-Davis Fleethoe 30 was not durable enough for skidding small-diameter In an early study in the Boise Basin Experimental trees, but the Case-Davis DH-4 functioned adequately Forest near Idaho City, reported by Haupt (1960, pp. with minimal site impact (including compaction and 635-638) and Haupt and Kidd (1965, pp. 665, 668), soil disturbance). See BMP's 2,and 3 for details. skid trails were reused whenever possible. Ninety percent of skid trail areas had 50 percent or more Uphill and Downhill Cable Yarding mineral soil exposed. However, skid trail soil distur- bance is beneficial for regeneration of ponderosa pine. No studies actually provided a quantitative com- Most of the material eroded from skid trail surfaces parison of uphill versus downhill cable yarding. was contained in erosion control structures; skid trails Craddock(1967,p. 25) and Megahan and Kidd (1972a, stabilized within 4 years. In some cases, there were p. 139) noted that downhill cable yarding in the Zena tradeoffs between area in skid trails and area in roads. Creek Logging Study Area near McCall increased soil Road erosion was a much greater source of stream disturbance and surface erosion. Jensen and Finn sedimentation, and roads provided poorer sites for (1966, pp. 8,32,59), based on their hydrologic analysis regeneration. of the same study area, recommended that road build- Based on his research on skid trail surface erosion ing be limited largely to ridge tops on the decomposed rates on volcanic ash cap soils near Headquarters, granitic landtype. Logging on these areas would re- McGreer (1981, p. 10)recommendedlirnitingthewidth quire uphill yarding or roadless logging systems. of blading of skid trails due to higher erosion rates on No references were found specific to BMP 9, lifting exposed subsoils and on soils without litter or slash leading ends of logs when downhill cable yarding. layers. Clayton (1990, p. 7) and Froehlich and others (1985, p. 1017)recommendedlimiting the total areain Research Results by Best Management skid trails due to the significant levels of soil compac- Practice tion observed on skid trails on granitic and volcanic soils. BMP 1-Rule 3.c. For each harvesting operation, Clayton (1990, pp. 2,4) found no significant differ- select the logging method and type of equipment ence in bulk density between main and secondary skid adapted to the given slope, landscape, and soil proper- trails (where secondary skid trails had an estimated 3 ties to minimize erosion. to 10 passes), for either rubber-tired skiddersor crawler See Rule 3.c.i. (BMP's 2 and 3) and Rule 3.c.iii., tractors. Lenhard (1978, pp. 10,22) found significant tractor size (BMP 7). changes in bulk density on volcanic-ash influenced BMP 2Rule3.c.i. Use other than tracked or wheel soils near Potlatch after 4 to 32 passes ofarubber-tired skidding on geologically unstable, saturated, or easily skidder, but not after one to two passes. He recom- compacted soils. mended that skidder operators disperse their move- ments rather than concentratethem when working on BMP 3-Rule 3.c.i. Use other than tractor or wheel similar soils. Similarly, Leverick (1980, pp. 88-89) skidding on slopes exceeding 45 percent gradient and found that bulk densities increased with the number immediately adjacent to a class I or class 11 stream, of passes (from 0 to 30) of a rubber-tired miniskidder, unless the operation can be done without causing accel- with the first 10 trips producing the greatest changes. erated erosion. These two rules will be considered together, with Tractor Size slope gradients indicated. Only one study actually compared the impacts of Packer 1966, Zena Creek Logging StudyArea, Payette small andlargetradors. In the Boise Basin Experimental National Forest, 67 percent slope gradient-Erosion Forest, Haupt (1960, pp. 636-638) found that bared did not differ on lands logged with jammer and mobile spar high-lead systems 2 years after logging. How- changes (ranging i?om 14to 34 percent) in bulk density ever, the watershed logged with jammers had almost after 4 to 32 passes; one to two passes did not produce seventimes more sediment insubdrainages beckuse of significant changes (pp. 10, 13). Bulk densities in- the road system needed to support thejammer (p. 695). creased from one to four passes; after four passes, bulk See Megahan and Kidd (1972b) for this study's densities were relatively constant (pp. 15-16). Bulk completion report. densities did not differ significantly between the treat- Arnold andLundeen 1968, SouthFork SalmonRiver, ment year and 1year afterward, except for the one- variable slopegradients, many inexcess of 45percent- and four-pass treatments. The one-pass treatment Average annual erosion on skid trails was estimated to showed anincrease in bulk density between years, and be 0.1 foot for the first 5 years aRer crawler tractor the four-pass treatment showed a decrease (p. 11). logging (p. 138). Four passes may be a threshold beyond which rapid recovery does not occur (p. 17). Burroughs and others 1972, Idaho-Montana border The pore-size distribution index was significantly near Lolo Pass, 23 percent slope gradient-Studies altered by all treatments except the one-pass treat- indicatedthat 1mile of roadin the deep snowpackzone ment (p. 12). The data indicate a redistribution of flow would intercept 310 acre-feet of overland flow and channels for treatments with more than four passes subsurface seepage during the spring snowmelt pe- (p. 18). This entails a reduction in macropores critical riod. Draining the intercepted water is critical, espe- for plant growth and atration processes (p. 22). cially in areas to be logged with jammers, because densities ofjammer roads offen exceed 10 linear miles Megahan and others 1979, Clearwater National per square mile (p. 11). Forest and Middle Fork Payette River Drainage, Boise National Forest, variable slope gradients-Landslide Megahan and Kidd 1972b, Deep Creek Drainage, occurrence tended to increase as either tree or Zena Creek Logging Study Area, Payette National crown cover decreased. When crown covers were less Forest (Control Watersheds Oompaul, Hamilton, than 80 percent, landslide occurrence appeared to be Tailholt and Circle End Creeks), slope gradient 67 more sensitive to reductions in shrub crown cover than percent-No significant difference was found in onsite to reductions in tree crown cover. The authors recom- erosion between skyline andjammer logging. Skyline mended using timber harvest procedures that mini- logging probably caused more disturbance than usual mize the disturbance of understory vegetation (p. 132). because the slopes were straight to convex and be- cause the logs were skidded downhill (p. 139). Leverick 1980, University of Idaho Experimental Jammer and skyline skidding increased sediment Forest, West Hatter Creek and Flat Creek Units, slope deposition in ephemeral drainages an average of 0.04 gradient not specified-Soil compaction and soil dis- tons per square mile per day from November 1960 to turbance were evaluated for a Case-Davis Fleethoe 30 September 1967. This represented 0.6 times more converted to a rubber-tired miniskidder for skidding sediment than measured on the control watersheds. small-diameter trees. On 13 percent of the area min- However, the roads supporting the jammer logging eral soil was exposed enough for erosion to occur (pp. caused large increases in sediment, 750 times that 91-94). Bulk density increased significantly in the top measured on the control watersheds (p. 140). 2 inches of the most heavily traveled skid trail of the Flat Creek unit, but not at soil depths of 4 to 6 inches Hartsog and Gonsior 1973, China Glenn Road, South or 8 to 10 inches. This minimal effect on bulk density Fork Salmon River drainage, , was attributed to dry soil conditions at the time of most slopes less than 50percentgradient-Tractor and treatment (p. xv, 91). A controlled experiment on the jammer skidding can cause disturbance and damage West Hatter Creek unit (with soil moisture varying to road prism components (cutslope, fillslope, tread, from 20.38 to 25.32 percent) indicated that compaction and ditch) and prevent correct functioning of the road was limited to the upper 6 inches of soil (p. xv). drainage system, thus causing serious sedimentation problems (p. 13). Clayton 1981, Silver Creek Study Area, Control Creek Watershed, Boise National Forest, 30 to 50 Kidd andKochenderfer 1973, literature review, slope percent slope gradients-Helicopter yarding with gradients not specified--Jammer logging required broadcast burning accelerated erosion on 2 percent of parallel contour roads every 200 to 400 feet (16 miles the area, with a short-term increase in erosion volume per section), mobile spar every 1,500 to 2,000 feet (3 of approximately one order of magnitude (p. 6). One miles per section) (p. 285). year after logging, 40 percent of the 6.0 tons per acre Lenhard 1978, near Potlatch, slope gradient not oferosionvolume was attributed to mechanical distur- specified-A Clark 666 rubber-tired skidder operating bance associated with logging; 32 percent was attrib- on volcanic-ash influenced soils produced significant uted to burning; 19 percent was associated with disturbance but not attributed to a single cause; and 9 variable alone (p. 23). Predictive equations for sea- percent was attributed to natural causes. During the sonal erosion and recovery time for natural mitigation following year, erosion volume was 4.0 tons per acre, of accelerated erosion (versus percent bare ground) with the percentages attributed to the various~causes were developed (pp. 24-26). about the same as in the first year (pp. 5-6). Rummer 1982, University of Idaho Experimental On 3 percent of the total area, soil horizon mixing Forest, Hatter Creek and Flat Creek Units, slopes 10 to was observed. This was attributed to a combination of 20 percent-A Case DH4 backhoe was converted to a rodent activity and mechanical disturbance associ- rubber-tired miniskidder to be tested for removing ated with logging (p. 6). thinning residues. Site impacts were evaluated as McGreer 1981, near Headquarters, slope gradients part of the study. Three of four stands showed signifi- up to 60percent, skid trailgradients 15 to 50percent- cant increases in bulk density, confined to the upper One-year erosion rates were measured on skid trail 6 inches of the soil profile on skid trails (that averaged plots established with a D-6 Caterpillar tractor. The 5 to 7 percent of the total stand area). Average bulk following tabulation was adapted from table 2, (p. 9): density values for the upper 6 inches of soil on skid Skid trail trails ranged from 1.11 to 1.43 grams per cubic centi- gradient Soil cover Erosion rate meter, in the lower half of the critical range (undis- Tons/ Area turbed areas in the Flat Creekunits had bulk densities Percent acre inches ranging from 0.93 to 1.12 grams per cubic centimeter 15 Ash with litter 0.28 0.003 in the upper 6 inches). Based on the depth, areal 45 Ash with litter 0.30 0.004 extent, and degree of compaction, the author con- 15 Ash without litter 1.00 0.012 cluded that there was minimal damage in terms of 45 Ash without litter 1.86 0.022 reduced site productivity (pp. 64,83,105). 15 Exposed subsoil 20.46 0.164 Soil disturbance studies showed that an average of 40 Exposed subsoil 72.60 0.583 79 percent of the total stand area (ranging from 70 to 50 Subsoil covered with slash 1.08 0.013 89 percent) was in the categories "undisturbed" or "litter disturbed but still in place" (p. 107). McGreer defined "area inches" as follows: "Area This study is a followup to Leverick (1980) and inches assumes an even distributionof erosion through- incorporates some of Leverick's data. out the area (plot), which in reality is seldom, if ever, the case. However, the measure is useful as an easy Krassel Ranger District, Payette National Forest 1983, way to visualize the unit." Teapot Timber Sale, fiassel Ranger District, Payette The author concluded that "ash topsoils are resis- National Forest, slope gradients rwt specifid-Line tant to erosion but exposure of underlying subsoils transects of three tractor- and tractor-jammer logged results in erosion rates severe enough to reduce long- units showed 81 to 100 (average 88) percent of the term soil productivity and to create stream sedimenta- sampling points were disturbed, 14to 54 (average 40) tion. Organic litter or slash effectively prevent ero- percent had bare soil (compared to 2 percent in undis- sion." [Abstract] turbed control transects), and 30 to 47 (average 40) Plots with ash horizons were approaching a zero percent appeared to be compacted. The compacted erosion rate by the end of the first year (p. 6); although sites showed a 26 percent increase in bulk density. erosion rates were decreasing, erosion from plots with Some loss of productivity was expected as a result of exposed subsoils was expected to remain high for at compaction (p. 9). least the second year (p. 7). Bellito 1985, Flat Creek Unit of the University of Recommendations (p. 10) included: Idaho Experimental Forest, slope gradient 20 to 40 Avoid bladed skid trails if possible percent, and near Smith's Ferry, slope gradient 80 to Minimize width and depth ofbladingwhere blading 100percent4te impacts, including compaction and is necessary soil disturbance, were evaluated for a Koller Model Top and limb trees on skid trails to the extent K-300 (small skyline yarder), and for a KWIK yarder feasible. rigged as a ground lead (double drum jammer) and as a live skyline (in effect a high lead) on the experimen- Carlton and others 1982, Gospel Hump, slopegradi- tal forest. Compaction associated with use of a single ents of logged plots varied from 9 to 53 percent-No drum jammer near Smith's Ferry was also evaluated. significant differences in erosion rates were found No appreciable compaction occurred during dry between skyline- and tractor-logged plots, or between weather cable yarding with either the Koller or the logged and undisturbed plots (p. 18). Surface erosion KWIK (clearcuts in units 1,2, and 3 of the experimental was adequately explained by a "percent bare ground" forest). Some compaction did occur in the Koller corri- ground-skidded, partial-cut areas, and nearby undis- dors but the area of impact was limited to about 1 turbed areas. Samples were taken at depths of 5.1, percent of the total unit (pp. 46-47). For the two 15.2, and 30.5 centimeters at sites rangingfrom 0 to 25 clearcut units yarded with the Koller skyline, there years since logging (sampled in 5-year age classes). was a small (0.07 grams per cubic centimeter) but Compaction was significant and highly persistent significant (alpha = 0.10) increase in bulk density at on both soil types. The only samples showing full the corridor centers. Bulk density changes were not recovery were the three oldest age classes at a depth of significant at 5 or 10 feet on either side of the corridor 5.1 centimeters on granitic soils. Nearly all other age centers (pp. 35, 62). In the worst case, this would be classes and soil depths showed highly significant differ- only 1.2 percent of the total area of the unit having ences (p < 0.01) between skid trails and undisturbed significant compaction (pp. 35,36,62). The author felt areas, for both soils. A trend toward recovery was that no productivity losses due to compaction occurred indicated by a significant relationship between time in the units logged in dry weather (p. 46). since logging and differences in bulk density (skid trail However, compaction was apparent on units logged versus undisturbed) for all but one combination of soil, during wet weather (shelterwood in units 4 and 5 of age, and depth. Recovery was faster at the 5.1 centime- the experimental forest). The section yarded with the ter depth than at the other depths sampled (pp. 1016- KWIK ground lead had a measured bulk density 1017). increase of 0.12 grams per cubic centimeter in the The difference in bulk density between skid trails corridors, which was significant at alpha = 0.05. Be- and undisturbed areas was significantly greater (p < cause the ground lead logging system required more 0.01) on the volcanic soils than on the granitic soils. skiddingcorridors than the skyline system, 21percent Initial compaction (percent difference in bulk density of the total area of the ground lead section was com- between skid trails and undisturbed areas) was sig- pacted, which would probably result in a loss of pro- nificantly (nearly two times) greater on the volcanic ductivity(~.36,46,59). CompactionintheKollerskyline soil than on the granitic soil, but recovery rates for the section of the shelterwood was limited to one corridor two soil types were not significantly different. There- where lack of deflection resulted in a yarding situation fore, the volcanic soils can be expected to take longer similar to a ground lead (p. 46). Higher soil moisture to achieve full recovery (p. 1017). contents during the ground lead yarding may have Megahan 1987, Silver Creek Study Area, Control contributed to the differences in compaction (p. 46). Creek and Eggers Creek Watersheds, Boise National All of the experimental forest units except one of two Forest, average slope gradient 50percent-& heli- Koller clearcuts had enough exposed mineral soil to copter yarding and prescribed burning, annual sedi- accommodatenatural regeneration. Deep disturbance ment yields increased sigmficantly (based on a paired was generally limited to the corridors (p. 46). Concen- watershed study). The increases, averaging 100 per- tration of disturbance in the numerous corridors of the cent, continued to persist 9 years after logging. Years clearcut unit yarded with the KWIK skyline resulted with the highest sediment yields in the control water- in a higher potential for erosion and sedimentation shed showed the greatest acceleration of sedimenta- than in the Koller clearcuts, even though one of these tion in the logged watershed. The increases in sedi- had significantly more exposed mineral soil (pp. 39-41, ment were attributed to surface and mass erosion in 69). the cutting units; no increases were measured in At the Smith's Ferry site, bulk density increased channel erosion or streamflow (p. 260). 0.29 grams per cubic centimeter (37.6 percent) in This paper does not separate logging and burning areas where the single drum jammer was used. Bulk effects; see Clayton (1981) and Megahan and others densities of samples from the logged area were signifi- (1995) for estimation of the relative influences of cantly higher (alpha = 0.05) than samples from adja- logging and burning. Megahan and others (1995) is a cent undisturbed areas. It was concludedthat reduced more complete report of the same study. productivity was likely (p. 38). The author concluded that the Koller skyline was Megahan 1988, literature review, variable slope preferable to the ground lead systems in this study, gradients-The amount of area in roads, skid trails, because it caused no significant compaction on either and landings for various logging systems was com- wet or dry soils when used properly, and had the pared, based on published studies. The Idaho data capability of creating the desired degree of soil distur- included: tractor-selection, tractor-group selection, bance depending on site conditions (p. 49). tractor-partial clearcut, jammer-group selection, and skyline-partial clearcut. For tractor logging, the area Froehlich and others 1985, two sites near McCall, in roads varied fkom 1.0 to 4.3 percent, and the area in s1opegradients:granitic soils 10to 45percent; volcanic skid trails varied fkom 6.7 to 6.8 percent. For jammer soils 10 to 35 percent-Bulk densities of granitic logging, 25 to 30 percent of the area was in roads. For and volcanic soils were evaluated on skid trails of skyline logging, 2.6 to 3.9 percent of the area was in Encourage operators to string cables'to logs in- roads (p. 337). stead of driving to them. Clayton 1990, Silver Creek Study Area, Central Megahan and others 1995, Silver Creek Study Area, Watersheds, Boise National Forest, slope gradients Control Creek and Eggers Creek Watersheds, Boise generally less than dopercent-Three sites were stud- National Forest, cutting unit gradients 24 to 97 per- ied for impacts of ground skidding on soils: one with a cent, averaging 47 percent-For the 10 years after designated main skid trail, logged by Caterpillar trac- (clearcut) helicopter logging and prescribed burning, tor; one with a designated main skid trail, logged by total sediment yield increased significantly (p < 0.05), rubber-tired skidder; and one 'loggers' choice," with no an average of 97 percent. Greatest effects were ob- restrictions other than adhering to BMP's. served during years with the highest sediment yields. $oil displacement was evaluated for main and sec- Active erosion within the cutting units was the ondary skid trails, landings, firelines, and "other" apparent source of the accelerated sediment. One categories. Total soil displacementwas similar for the progressive mass failure contributed a maximum of 6 three units, but the distribution among the categories percent of the total. The remainder was attributed to varied. The loggers' choice unit had the least skid trail accelerated surface erosion resulting from exposure of disturbance due to its more circular shape. Total skid bare soil on the cutting units. Vegetative cover of trail disturbance was equal for the skidder and tractor and herbs was still below predisturbance levels units (25 percent); however, there was less displace- 10 years after logging; this was due to the effects of ment in the "other" category for the skidder unit (3.5 prescribed burning on the harsh south aspect Idaho percent) than for the tractor (8.5 percent) and loggers' Batholith site (pp. 22-24). Accelerated erosion and choice (10 percent). This difference was attributed to sedimentation generated by prescribed burning on the additional displacement associated with maneu- such sites tends to outweigh the benefits gained by vering the tractor. Total area with soil displacement helicopter yarding. was 33.5 percent for the tractor unit, 28.5 percent for The accelerated sedimentation in this study was the skidder unit, and 27 percent for the loggers' choice primarily attributed to burning, not logging. This is a unit (p. 3). This can be compared with 1.5 percent more complete report ofthe study described inMegahan displacement (exclusiveof landings constructed away (1987). from cutting units) associated with helicopter logging See the General Erosion Research Summary for in the adjacent ControlCreekwatershed(C1ayton1981). additional information. Significant increases (ranging from 15to 29 percent) BMP &Rule 3.c.ii. Limit the grade of constructed in bulk density occurred in all skid trail areas of each skid trails on geologically unstable, saturated, highly unit. A significant increase (32 percent) in bulk den- erodible, or easily compacted soils to a maximum of 30 sity also occurred in the landing of the loggers' choice percent. unit (the only landing included in the study). Other areas showed only slight changes in bulk density Kiolcl 1963, four sites on the Boise and Payette Na- (pp. 3,4). Differences between bulk densities on trac- tional Forests-Three sites were selectedwithg tor and skidder skid trails were not statistically sig- soil parent material, and one with nificant at the 95 percent level (p. 6). basalt soil parent material. Quantitative and qualita- Penetrometer measurements of the tractor and tive evaluations were made of erosion on skid trail skidder main skid trails and the loggers' choice land- segments and effectiveness of various erosion control ing (the only areas tested) all showed significant measures (slash dams, log water bars, lop-and-scatter changes in both surface (0 to 7.5 centimeters) and slash). All skid trails were seeded after the control subsurface (7.5 to 17.5 centimeters) soils (p. 5). measures were applied. Skid trail slopes varied from The author concluded that multiple passes with 20 to 90 percent (p. 2). either type of ground skidder (rubber-tired skidders or The quantitative data were used to evaluate how the crawler tractors) resulted in significant soil compac- measured erosion volumes varied with slope gradient, tion on coarse-textured granitic soils. On at least two structure spacing, and soil parent material. Slope of the three cutting units, the increases in bulk densi- gradient class (20 to 30,40to 50, or 60 to 70 percent)was ties for skid trails and landings fell into the monitoring not found significant in the analysis of variance (p. 4). category of "detrimentally compacted," and productiv- Analysis of the qualitative structure performance ity losses might be expected. In the third unit, the ratings indicated that more skid trail erosion occurred value fell outside the 95 percent confidence interval. in ravines than on hillsides, and that all the structure The author recommended the following techniques types tended to be ineffective in ravines. This was true to minimize the area impacted by ground skidding: for both soil types. However, the structure rating value analysis showed that the basaltic soil skid trails Restrict skidding to marked trails showed less erosion than those on granitic soils, with Require directional felling the difference almost significant atthe 1-percentlevel. volumes, tractor size). If we assume that skid trail This may be due to inherent erodibility and productiv- width is partially dependent on tractor size, this re- ity characteristics (pp. 4-5). According to the 'author, search has implications for BMP 5. See discussion of "The structure rating values were lower on basalt; this the effects of tractor size under this reference in BMP suggests that basaltic soil is inherently less erodible 7 (Rule 3.c.iii., tractor size rule). and more productive in growing ground cover that is McGreer 1981, near Headquarters-One-year ero- effective in controlling erosion." sion rates were measured on skid trail plots estab- Statistical analysis ofthe qualitative ratings showed lished with a D-6 Caterpillar tractor. Measured val- that the interactions of soil and structure treatment ues, adapted from table 2 (p. 9), were: and soil and slope gradient were significant at a level between 1and 5 percent. "This means that soil had a Skid trail variable effect on the structure performance rating, gradient Soil cover Erosion rate depending upon the structure used and slope class" Tons / Area (p. 5). Percent acre inches Based on two research studies and the experience of 15 Ash with litter 0.28 0.003 erosion control crews, the author recommended struc- 45 Ash with'litter 0.30 0.004 ture spacing by soil parent type (granite or basalt), 15 Ash without litter 1.00 0.012 45 1.86 0.022 slope gradient (10 to 70 percent), and topographic Ash without litter 15 Exposed subsoil 20.46 0.164 location (sidehill or ravine) (p. 6). 40 Exposed subsoil 72.60 0.583 McGreer 1981, near Headquarters-One-year ero- 50 Subsoil covered with slash 1.08 0.013 sion rates were measured on skid trail plots estab- lished with a D-6 Caterpillar tractor. Measured val- The author recommended limiting the width of ues, adapted from table 2 (p. 9), were: blading of skid trails due to higher erosion rates on exposed subsoils and on soils without litter or slash Skid trail layers (p. 10). gradient Soil cover Erosion rate ~hnsl Area Froehlich and others 1985, two sites near McCall- Percent acre inches The authors recommended minimizing the area in 15 Ash with litter 0.28 0.003 skid trails due to persistent compaction (more than 25 45 Ash with litter 0.30 0.004 years) on ground-skidded areas (p. 1017). See sum- 15 Ash without litter 1.00 0.012 mary of this publication under Rule 3.c.i. (BMP's 2 and 45 Ash without litter 1.86 0.022 3) for details. 15 Exposed subsoil 20.46 0.164 40 Exposed subsoil 72.60 0.583 Clayton 1990, Silver Creek Study Area, Central 50 Subsoil covered with slash 1.08 0.013 Watersheds, Boise National Forest-Three sites were studied for impacts of ground skidding on soils: one For comparable plots, increases in slope from 15 to with a designated main skid trail, logged by Caterpil- 40 or 45 percent increased erosion. At the steeper lar tractor; one with a designated main skid trail, gradients, erosion increased by factors of 1.2 for the logged by rubber-tired skidder; and one "loggers' ash with litter, 1.7 for the ash without litter, and 3.7 choice," with no restrictions other than adhering to for the exposed subsoil plots (p. 6). However, the BMP's. effects of the soils, litter, and slash variables were Bulk density increased significantly in all areas much greater than those of slope (p. 6). Both of the classified as skid trails in each unit (pp. 3-4). The exposed subsoil plots had high erosion rates, even on author recommended limiting skid trail area by desig- the gentler slope; all of the volcanic ash topsoil plots nating skid trails, by directional felling, and by string- had low erosion rates, even on the steeper slopes ing cables rather than driving to logs (p. 7). (p. 10). See the summary of this publication under Rule See the ~eneralErosion Research Summary for 3.c.i. (BMP's 2 and 3) for details. additional information on geologically unstable, satu- BMP &Rule 3.c.iii. Limit skid trails to the mini- rated, highly erodible, or easily compacted soils. mum feasible number. BMP 6-Rule 3.c.iii. Limit skid trails to the mini- Haupt 1960, Boise Basin ExperimentalForest, Boise mum feasible width. National Forest-The objective of this research was to Haup t 1960, Boise Basin Experimental Forest, Boise determine the andarealextentofsoil dist~bance National Forest-The objective of this research was to caused by logging activities under various treatments determine the type and areal extent of soil disturbance (silvicultural systems, initial stand volumes, reserve caused by logging activities under various treatments volumes, tractor size). Areas bared by logging were (silvicultural systems, initial stand volumes, resene classified as having more or less than 50 percent ofthe mineral soil exposed. About 90 percent of the "skid- In the West Hatter Creek unit, experiments were ding and associated disturbance" areas had more than conducted to evaluate bulk density changes at various 50 percent mineral soil exposed (p. 635). However, the depths as related to the number oftrips (O,l, 5,10,15, author noted that skid trail disturbance is beneficial 20, 25, or 30) with the skidder (pp. 43, 88). Soil for regeneration of ponderosa pine (p. 638). moisture varied from 20.38 to 25.32 percent on the This study also showed that tradeoffs might exist skid trails tested (p. 88). Bulk density varied with between area in skid trails and area in roads; see the number of trips at the 0 to 2 inch depth and at the 4 to summary under the next rule (BMP 7) for details. See 6 inch depth, but changes were not significant at a Haupt and Kidd (1965) for a followup to this report. depth of 8 to 10 inches (p. 89). The first 10 trips Haupt and Kidd 1965, Boise Basin Experimental produced the greatest changes in bulk density (p. 88), Forest, Boise National Forest-This articleis a followup about 13 percent at a depth of 0 to 2 inches and 10 to Haupt (1960). An attempt was made to minimize percent at 4 to 6 inches (pp. 132-133). erosion associated with logging and logging road con- In the Flat Creek unit, the most heavily traveled struction in 1953 to 1954 by use of "good logging skid trail was sampled for bulk density around four practices," including reuse of skid trails wherever points representing various frequencies of travel. possible (p. 665). Undisturbed areas near each samplingpoint were also Most skid trail rill erosion occurring on the study sampled. Samples were taken at depths of 0 to 2,4 to area during the first 4 years was contained in the next 6, and 8 to 10 inches (p. 44). Skid trail points were erosion control structure downslope; after that time significantlydifferent from nearby undisturbed points skid trails had stabilized due to rehabilitation meas- only at the 0 to 2 inch depth, probably because of dry ures. Sedimentfrom skid trails was deliveredtostreams soil conditions at the time of the experiment (p. 91). only near stream crossings (p. 668). However, there were significant differences among points with different travel frequencies at the 0 to 2 Lenhard 1978, near Potlatch-On volcanic-ash in- and 2 to 4 inch depths (p. 91). fluenced soils, a Clark 666 rubber-tired skidder was used to test for changes in soil properties as travel Froehlich and others 1985, two sites near McCall- intensity increased. Seven sites within one-half acre The authors recommended minimizing the area in were randomly assigned treatments of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, skid trails due to persistent compaction (more than 25 and 32 passes (p. 7). years) on ground-skidded areas (p. 1017). See the Significant changes in bulk density (rangingfrom 14 summary of this publication under Rule 3.c.i. (BMP's to 34 percent) occurred for 4 to 32 passes; one to two 2 and 3) for details. passes did not produce significant changes (p. 10). Clayton 1990, Silver Creek Study Area, Central Bulk densities increased from one to four passes; after Watersheds, Boise National Forest-Three sites were four passes, bulk densities were relatively constant studied for impacts of ground skidding on soils: one (pp. 15-16). Bulk densities did not differ significantly with a designated main skid trail, logged by Caterpil- between years (treatment year and 1year after treat- lar tractor; one with a designated main skid trail, ment) except for the one- and four-passtreatments (p. logged by rubber-tired skidder; and one 'loggers' 11). The one-pass treatment showed an increase in choice," with no restrictions other than adhering to bulk density between years; the four-pass treatment BMP's. showed a decrease. Four passes may be a threshold Bulk density increased significantly (ranging from value beyond which rapid recovery does not occur (p. 17). 15 to 29 percent) for all areas classified as skid trails Pore-size distribution index was significantly al- in each unit (pp. 3-4). Bulk density did not differ tered by all treatments except the one-pass treatment significantly between the main and secondary skid (p. 12). The data indicate a redistribution of flow trails on either the tractor or skidder units (p. 4). channels for treatments with more than four passes Secondary skid trails had an estimated 3 to 10 passes (p. 18). This entails a reduction in macropores critical (p. 2); this designation was not used on the loggers' for plant growth and infiltration processes (p. 22). choice unit. The author recommended limiting skid On similar soils, the author suggests that skidder trail area by designating skid trails, by directional operators attempt to disperse rather than concentrate felling, and by stringing cables rather than driving to their movements over the harvesting unit (p. 22). logs (p. 7). Leverick 1980, University of Idaho Experimental See the summary of this publication under Rule Forest, West Hatter Creek and Flat Creek Units--Soil 3.c.i. (BMP's 2 and 3) for details. compaction and soil disturbance were evaluated for a BMP 7-Rule 3.c.iii. Limit tractor size to the mini- Case-Davis Fleethoe 30 converted to a rubber-tired mum appropriate for the job. miniskidder for skidding small-diameter trees. Haupt 1960, Boise Basin Experimental Forest, Boise was delivered to streams only near stream crossings National Forest-The objective ofthis research was to (p. 668). Most sediment heading to and in channels determine the type and areal extent of soil disturbance was from haul roads; roadways were revegetated and caused by logging activities under various treatments stabilized by 1958 (p. 668). (silvicultural systems, initial stand volumes, reserve Leverick 1980, University of Idaho Experimental volumes, and tractor size). Bared areas in skid trails Forest, West Hatter Creek and Flat Creek units-The averaged 34 acres per square mile and haul roads Case-Davis Fleethoe 30 converted to a miniskidder averaged 19 acres per square mile for large tractors was not durable enough for skidding small-diameter (D-8); areasinskid trails averaged 17acres per square trees. The author suggested that the Case-Davis DH4, mile, and areas in haul roads averaged 33 acres per a slightly larger utility machine, might be better square mile for small tractors (D-4)(p. 636). suited (p. 97). See Rule 3.c.i. (BMP's 2 and 3) for site Some aerencesin the patterns of disturbance were impacts; see Rummer (1982) for a followup. noted among silvicultural systems. For stem selection, using smaller tractors, road areaincreased as harvest- Rurnmer 1982, University of Idaho Experimental ing intensified (moretrees per square mile), while skid Forest, Hatter Creek and Flat Creek units-The Case trail area remained constant. For the larger tractors, DH4 backhoe was tested for skidding small-diameter skid trail area increased, while road area remained trees, as recommended by Leverick (1980). The DH4 constant (pp. 637-638). Regression analysis indicated functioned adequately with minimal site impact; see that the total amount of bared area at any given level Rule 3.c.i. (BMP's 2 and 3) for details. of harvest intensity might be slightly greater for large BMP %Rule 3.c.i~.Uphill cableyarding is preferred. tractors than for small tractors under a stem selection system (p. 637). Jensen and Finn 1966, Zena Creek Logging Study For group selection, the effects of tractor size on the Area, Payette National Forest-A hydrologic analysis relative areas in skid trails and roads were not appar- of the study area (13,334 acres) was conducted to ent. Areas of disturbance were similar for bothtractor evaluate watershed conditions and make recommen- sizes, and both skid trail and road disturbance in- dations (pp. 1, 2). Five landtypes were present; the creased as harvesting levels intensified (p. 638). The decomposed granitic landtype was most susceptibleto authors state: "Results of the present study indicate erosion and sedimentation problems. For example, in rather conclusively that excessive haul road distur- any watershed, the sedimentation rate was directly bance is associated with use of small tractors in stem proportional to the road mileage constructed in the selection cutting" (p. 638). lands with decomposed granitic soils (pp. 4,85). Sedi- Skid trail disturbance is beneficial to regeneration ment rates as much as 1,000times higher than normal of ponderosa pine, while most haul roads offer poor were measured in some watersheds with decomposed sites for regeneration. Haul roads are useful for pro- granitic soils (p. 84). Subsurface flows of water are viding future access (p. 638). intercepted by roadcuts, interrupting the normal hy- See Haupt and Kidd (1965) for a followup article drologic function and beginning a cycle of accelerated with implications for this rule. erosion on these landtypes (pp. 4,32,62). Because of these characteristics,the authors recom- Haupt and Kid 1965, Boise Basin Experimental mended that road building on decomposed granitic Forest, Boise National Forest-This is a followup to soils be limited mostly to ridgetops, unless exposed Haupt (1960). Although the results presented here do areas could be completely stabilized, and the hydro- not address the tractor size rule, when combined with logic fundion could be preserved (pp. 8, 32). Logging the results given in the summary for Haupt (1960) on these areas would require logging systems capable there are implications for the rule. of uphill yarding to ridgetop roads, or logging systems An attempt was made to minimize erosion associ- that do not require roads (p. 59). They felt that the ated with logging and logging road construction from Skagit Mobile Yarder, a skyline yarder that had been 1953to 1954 by use of "good logging practices," includ- used in the study area, could be used in some situa- ing reuse of skid trails, a prohibition on skidding down tions with minimal watershed damage if roads were channels, limited skidding across channels, seeding of built on ridgetops or on stable landtypes (other than skid trails, installationof slash barriers or cross ditches decomposed granitics). However, they noted that the on skid trails, installation of cross ditches on roads, Skagit system was not the ultimate for logging of and seeding and harrowing of roads (p. 665). decomposed granitic soils (p. 59). Most skid trail rill erosion occurring on the study See Craddock (1967) for further information. area during the first 4 years (1953 to 1957) was contained in the next erosion control structure Craddock 1967, Zena Creek Logging study Area, downslope; by 1957 skid trails had stabilized due to Payette National Forest-Both downhill and uphill rehabilitation measures. Sediment from skid trails cable yardingwere conducted on the study area, using the Skagit Mobile Yarder, a skyline yarder. Although 19 through 26, see the corresponding BMP7sunder no quantitative erosion data were given, the downhill Rule 4.c., Road construction. cable yarding configuration was unsatisfacto2y. Rea- sons included ground disturbance, damage to the Research Results by Best Management residual stand, and lack of control. When the uphill Practice yarding configuration was used, soil disturbance was minimal and stand damage was also avoided (p. 25). BMP 10-Rule 3.d. Locate landings on stable areas 1972b, to prevent the risk of materials entering streams. Megahan and Kidd Deep Creek drainage, See Rule 3.d.i., landing location rule (BMP 13), and Zena Creek Logging Study Area, Payette National the General Erosion Research Summary. Forest-Onsite erosion for skyline and jammer log- ging were evaluated using erosion plots. No signifi- BMP 11-Rule 3.d. Locate skid trails on stable cant differences were found between the two methods; areas to prevent the riskofmaterials entering streams. sediment production in ephermeral drainages in- See Rule 3.d.i., skid trail location rule (BMP 14), and creased an average of 0.6 times for the 5 years after the General Erosion Research Summary. logging (pp. 139-140). The skyline system probably BMP 12-Rule 3.d. Locate fire trails on stable areas caused more disturbance thanusualbecause the slopes to prevent the risk of materials entering streams. were straight to convex, rather than concave, and See Rule 3.d.i., fire trail location rule (BMP 15), and because the logs were skidded downhill rather than the General Erosion Research Summary. uphill (p. 139). BMP 13--~ule3.d.i. Locate allnew or reconstructed BMP 9-Rule 3.c.i~.When downhill cable yarding is landings on stable areas outside the appropriate stream used, take reasonable care to lifi leading ends of logs protection zone. to minimize downhill movement of slash and soils. See the General Erosion Research Summary; no No references were found specific to lifting leading specific references were found. ends of logs; see the previous rule (BMP 8) for general observations regarding downhill cable yarding. BMP 1ARule3.d.i. Locate all new or reconstructed skid trails on stable areas outside the appropriate stream protection zone. Rule 3.d. Location of Landings, Skid See the General Erosion Research Summary; no Trails, and Fire Trails specific references were found. BMP 15-Rule 3.d.i. Locate all new or reconstructed Seventeen BMP's (10 through 26) were evaluated. These BMP7sdeal with four major concepts: fire trails on stable areas outside the appropriate stream protection zone. (1) The location of landings, skid trails, and fire See the General Erosion Research Summary; no trails relative to: specific references were found. Site stability BMP 16Rule 3.d.i. Locate fire trails where The stream protection zone sidecasting is held to a minimum. Amount of sidecasting No references were found. (BMP7s10 through 17); BMP 17-Rule 3.d.i. Locate skid trails where (2) Landing size (BMP 18); sidecasting is held to a minimum. (3) Inclusion of slash or stumps in landing fill mate- No references were found. rial (BMP's 19 and 20); 18-Rule 3.d.ii. Minimize the size of landings (4) Stabilization of landings requiring sidecasting BMP to that necessary for safe economical operation. by (BMP's 21 through 26): No references were found. Seeding Compaction BMP 19-Rule 3.d.iii. Keep fill material used in Riprapping landing construction free of loose stumps to prevent Benching landslides. Mulching No references were found specific to landings; see Other suitable means. rule 4.c.iv., woody materials in roadfills (BMP 127). references were foundthats~ecificall~dealt BMP 2CRule 3.d.iii. Keep fill material used in No ldngconstruction free of excessiveslash toprevent these topics in the context of landings, skid trails, and fire trails. However, information on stable areas is in landslides. No references were found specific to landings; see the General Erosion Resemh S=~W- For BMP7s rule 4.c.iv., woody in roadfills (BMP 127). BMP 21-Rule 3.d.iii. On slopes where sidecasting Practices 42 through 44 address achieving landing is necessary, stabilize landings- by use of: seeding (first drainage and stabilization through: alternative). Reshaping (BMP 42); No references were found specific to landings; see Establishing ground cover (BMP 43); rule 4.c.iii., stabilization of exposed material by seed- Other means (BMP 44). ing (BMP 117). No research was found on fire trail stabilization. BMP 2!2-Rule 3.d.iii On slopes where sidecasting Only one reference was found on landing drainage. is stabilize lan&@ by use of: compadion Clayton (1990, p. 7) noted that standard rock ripwrs (second alternative). did not adequately reduce subsoil compaction on a No references were found specific to landings; see landing in the Silver Creek study area H~ recorn- rule 4.c.iii., stabilization of exposed material by com- mended that other implements be tested. paction (BMP 118). Froehlich and others (1985, p. 1017) recommended BMP 23--Rule 3.d.iii. On slopes where sidecasting scarifyingskid trails because bf the long-term compac- is necessary, stabilize landings by use of: riprapping tion observed in their research. (third alternative). Kidd (1963, pp. 4-6) found that log water bars were No references were found specific to landings; see more effective than slash dams, or lopping and scatter- rule 4.c.iii., stabilizationofexposedmaterial by riprap- ing slash, for controlling erosion on seeded skid trails ping (BMP 119). with soils derived from granite or basalt. Cross ditches BMP 2ARule 3.d.iii. On slopes where sidecasting could be substituted for log water bars if every third or is necessary, stabilize landings by use of: benching fourth structure remained a log water bar. All struc- (fourth alternative). tures were generally ineffective in ravines. No references were found specific to landings; see Haupt and Kidd (1965, p. 668) noted that both slash rule 4.c.iii., stabilizationof exposed material by bench- barriers and cross ditches were generally effective in ing (BMP 120). containing sediment on seeded skid trails in the Boise Basin Experimental Forest. BMP 25-Rule 3.d.iii. On slopes where sidecasting McGreer (1981, p. 9) found that, for skid trails with is necessary, stabilize landings by use of: mulching the volcanic ash topsoils intact, leaving a remnant (fiRh alternative). litter layer reduced &st-year erosion 72 percent on 15 No references were found specific to landings; see percent gradient skid trails, and 84 percent on 45 rule bc.iii., stabilizationofexposedmaterialby mulch- percent gradient trails. For skid trails with the volca- ing (BMP 121). nic ash topsoil bladed away and the alluvial subsoils BMP 26-Rule 3.d.iii. On slopes where sidecasting exposed, first-year erosion was reduced by placing is necessary, stabilize landings by use of: other suit- slash on the skid trail. Erosion on the slash-treated, 50 able means (sixth alternative). percent gradient skid trail was 98.5 percent less than No references were found specific to landings; see on a 40 percent gradient skid trail without slash, and rule 4.c.iii., stabilization of exposed material by other 94.7 percent less than on a 15 percent gradient skid suitable means (BMP 122). trail without slash. Skid trails with exposed alluvial subsoils without slash treatments had much higher erosion rates and slower recovery than skid trails on Rule 3.e. Drainage Systems volcanic ash topsoils. Gray and Megahan (1981 p. 21) recommended Zeav- Seventeen BMP's (27 through 44) were evaluated. hgundisturbedvegetation below skid trails and other Best management practices 27 through 29 are the disturbed areas to spread water and reduce the likeli- general rule 3.e.: For each landing, skid trail, and fire hood of mass erosion. trail, provide and maintain a drainage- system- that will control the dispersal of surface water in order to . prevent sediment from damaging Class I streams. Research Results by Best Management Practices 30 through 41 suggest six alternatives for Practice stabilizing skid trails and firetrails: BMP 27-Rule 3.e. For each landing, provide and Water bars (BMP's 30 and 36); maintain a drainage system that will control the Cross drains (BMP's 31 and 37); dispersal of surface water in order to prevent sediment Outsloping- - (BMP's 32 and 38); from damaging Class I streams. Scarif~cation(BMP's 33 and 39); Gray and Megahan 1981, Pine Creek, Boise National Seeding (BMP's 34 and 40); Forest-Based on their analyses of slope stability in Other suitable means (BMP's 35 and 41). the Idaho Batholith, the authors recommend leaving undisturbed vegetation to provide water-spreading sloughing; every third or fourth structure should be a areas large enough to accommodate water draining log water bar to divert water. Cross ditches are the from roads, skidtrails, and other disturbed areas (p. 21). least expensive. Lopping and scattering of slash was BMP 28-Rule 3.e. For each skid trail, provide and recommended for gentler slopes with minimal poten- maintain a drainage system that will control the tial for surface flow undercutting. Recommendations dispersal of surface water in order to prevent sediment are given for spacing of structures based on slope from damaging Class I streams. gradient, soil parent material, and sidehill versus ravine (p. 6). Gray and Megahan 1981-See discussion under BMP 27. BMP 31-Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize See Rule 3.e.i., skid trail drainage (BMP's 30 through erosion-prone skid trails by: cross draining (second 35). alternative). BMP 29-Rule 3.e. For each fire trail, provide and Kidd 1963-See Rule 3.e.i., stabilization of skid maintain a drainage system that will control the trails by water barring (BMP 30). dispersal of surface water in order to prevent sediment Haupt and Kidd 1965, Boise Basin Experimental from damaging Class I streams. Forest, near Idaho City-On seeded skid trails with Gray and Megahan 1981-See discussion under slash barriers or cross ditches, sediment from rills was BMP 27. generally contained by erosion control structures dur- See Rule 3.e.i., fire trail drainage (BMP9s'36through ing the first 4 years; after that, skid trails had stabi- 41). lized. Skid trail sediment reached streams only near stream crossings (p. 668). No quantitative effective- BMP 30-Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize ness data were given. erosion-prone skid trails by: water barring (first alternative). BMP 32-Rule 3.e.i. Keeping'current, stabilize erosion-prone skid trails by: outsloping (third Kidd 1963, four sites on the Payette and Boise Nu- alternative). twnal Forests, three granitic, one basaltic-Various No references were found. skid trail erosion control methods (lopping and scat- tering slash, slash dams, and log water bars) were BMP 33--Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize ero- tested on two soil parent materials, granite and basalt sion-prone skid trails by: scarifying (fourth alternative). (p. 1).All skid trails were seeded after installation of Froehlich and others 1985, two sites near McCall, erosion control structures (p. 2). Qualitative effective- one granitic, one volcanic-The authors recommend ness ratings were assigned with 1.0 completely effec- scarifying skid trails because of persistent compaction tive and 4.8 completely ineffective (p. 3). (more than 25 years) on ground-skiddedareas (p. 1017). Effectivenessratings of the various structures were See Rule 3.c.i. (BMP's 2 and 3) for details. not significantly different in analysis of variance be- BMP 3P-Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize ero- cause of the general ineffectiveness of all types of sion-prone skid trails by: seeding (fifth alternative). structures in ravine bottoms (pp. 4-51. Water-divert- ing structures (log water bars and cross ditches) were Kidd 1963-see rule 3.e.i., stabilizationofskid trails generally more effective than the sediment-filtering by water .barring (BMP 30); seeding was used in methods (slash dams and lopping and scattering of conjunction with other methods tested rather than slash) (p. 5). being tested separately. Effectivenessofthe various structures was analyzed Haupt and Kidd 1965-See rule 3.e.i., stabilization relative to soil parent material, sidehill versus ravine, of skid trails by cross draining (BMP 31); seeding was and percent of slope. Overall, log water bars were most used in conjunction with other methods rather than effective,with ratings of 1.78 on granitic soils and 1.54 being tested separately. on basaltic soils, compared to ratings of 2.15 (granitic See the General Erosion Research Summary re- soils) and 2.25 (basaltic soils)for slash dams, and 2.93 gardingthe effectiveness ofvegetationand other ground (granitic soils) and 1.60 (basaltic soils) for lopping and cover in reducing erosion. scattering of slash (p. 5). Slash dams were not recommended for use on BMP 36-Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize ero- sidehills due to their high relative cost and their sion-prone skid trails by: other suitable means (sixth inability to divert water; they also deteriorate and alternative). become ineffectivein 1 or 2 years. Log water bars do an Kidd 1963-see rule3.e.i., stabilizationofskidtrails excellent job of diverting water on either flat or shal- by water barring (BMP 30) for a discussion of the low, trough-shaped sidehill skid trails. Cross ditches effectiveness of slash dams and lopping and scattering can be substituted for log water bars, but are prone to slash. Haupt and Kidd 1965-See rule 3.e.i., stabilization BMP 41-Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize ero- of skid trails by cross draining (BMP 31), for a discus- sion-prone fire trails by: other suitable means (sixth sion of the effectiveness of slash barriers. alternative). McGreer 1981, near Headquarters-For skid trails No references were found specific to fire trails; see with the volcanic ash topsoils intact, leaving a rem- Rule 3.e.i., stabilization of skid trails by other suitable nant litter layer reduced first-year erosion 72 percent means (BMP 35). on 15percent gradient skid trails, and 84 percent on 45 BMJ? 42-Rule 3.e.ii. Reshape landings as needed to percent gradient skid trails (p. 9). facilitate drainage prior to fall and spring runoff. For skid trails with the volcanic ash topsoil bladed No references were found. away and the alluvial subsoils exposed, first-year erosion was reduced by placing slash on the skid trail. BMF'43-Rule 3.e.ii. Within 1year after harvesting all Erosion on the slash-treated 50 percent gradient skid is completed, stabilize landings by establishing ground cover (first alternative). trail was 98.5 percent less than on a 40 percent No references were found specific to landings; see gradient skid trail without slash, and 94.7 percent less the General Erosion Research Summary regarding than on a 15 percent gradient skid trail without slash stability due to ground cover. See Clayton 1990,under (p. 9). BMP 44, stabilizationof landingsby some other means. Skid trails with exposed (no slash) alluvial subsoils had much higher erosion rates and slower recovery BMP 44--Rule 3.e.ii. Within 1year after harvesting than skid trails on volcanic ash topsoils (p. 9). is completed, stabilize all landings by: some ather Although water bar use was not a variable in this means (second alternative). study, it was assumed that water bars would be used Clayton 1990, Silver Creek, Boise National Forest- whenever topsoils or subsoils were exposed (p. 10). The landing tested in this study was compacted (to a See the General Erosion Research Summary for statistically significant degree assumed to be detri- additional information. mental to productivity); standard rock rippers did not BMP 36--Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize ero- successfully reduce subsoil compaction. The author sion-prone iire trails by: water barring (first alternative). recommended that other implements such as the No references were found specSc to fire trails; see winged subsoiler be tested (p. 7). Rule 3.e.i., stabilization of skid trails by water barring (BMP 30). Rule 3.f. Treatment of Waste BMP 37-Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize Materials erosion-prone fire trails by: cross draining (second alternative). Seventeen BMP's (45 through 61) were evaluated. No references were found specific to fire trails; see Practices 45 through 47 comprise the general rule 3.f.: Rule 3.e.i., stabilization of skidtrails by cross draining "All debris, overburden, and other waste material (BMP 31). associated with harvesting shall be left or placed in BMP 38-Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize such a manner as to prevent their entry by erosion, erosion-prone fire trails by: outsloping (third high water, or other means into streams." The remain- alternative). ing BMP's deal with five general topics: No references were found specific to fire trails; see Felling, bucking, and limbingtrees such that trees Rule 3.e.i., stabilization of skid trails by outsloping and tree parts fall away from Class I streams (BMP 32). (BMP's 48 through 50); BMP 39-Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize Removing slash and debris that falls into streams erosion-prone fire trails by: scarifying (fourth (BMP's 51,52,54,55); alternative). Placement or treatment of material removed &om No references were found specific to fire trails; see streams (BMP's 53,56,57); Rule 3.e.i., stabilization of skid trails by scarifying Placement of waste material from construction or (BMP 33). maintenance of landings, skid trails, and fire trails (BMP's 58 through 60); BMP 40--Rule 3.e.i. Keeping current, stabilize ero- Placement of logging operation waste such as sion-prone fire trails by: seeding (fifth alternative). crankcase oil, filters, grease, and oil containers No references were found specific to fire trails; see (BMP 61). Rule 3.e.i., stabilization of skid trails by seeding (BMP 34). No research was found that addressed these topics in any depth. Only one study was considered relevant. Megahan and others (1995) found some evidence that removing logging slash from streams by hand may removal may have disturbed some natural channel have released sediments stored behind natural chan- obstructions in the logged watershed. nel obstructions. See Rule 4.c.i.i., clearing road construction debris The reader is also referred to Rule 4.c.ii., clearing from drainage ways (BMP 115). road construction debris from drainage ways (BMP BMP 62--Rule 3.f.i. Continuously remove other 115). King (1981, p. 63) concluded that normal slash debris that enters Class I streams as a result of clearing operations associated with road construction harvesting operations whenever there is a potential activities have minimal effects on stream sedimentation. for stream blockage or if the stream has the ability for transporting such debris. Research Results by Best Management No references were found. Practice BMP 63-Rule 3.f.i. Place removed material 5 feet BMP 46-Rule 3.f. Leave or place all debris associ- slope distance above the ordinary high water mark. ated with harvesting in such a manner as to prevent No references were found. entry by erosion, high water, or other means into BMP 6ARule 3.f.ii. Immediately after skidding streams. remove slash that enters Class I1 streams whenever No references were found. there is a potential for stream blockage or if the stream BMP 46-Rule 3.f. Leave or place all overburden has the ability for transporting such debris. associated with harvesting in such a manner as to Megahan and others 1995-See summary under prevent entry by erosion, high water, or other means BMP 51. into streams. No references were found. BlVIP 66-Rule 3.f.ii. Immediately after skidding remove other debris that enters Class I1 streams BMP 47-Rule 3.f. Leave or place all other waste whenever there is a potential for stream blockage or material associated with harvesting in such a manner if the stream has the ability for transporting such as to prevent entry by erosion, high water, or other debris. means into streams. No references were found. No references were found. BMP 66-Rule 3.f.ii. Place removed material above BMP 48-Rule 3.f.i. Wherever possible, fell trees in the high water mark (first alternative). such a manner that the tree or any part thereof will No references were found. fall away from any Class I streams. No references were found. BMP 57-Rule 3.f.ii. Otherwise treat (removed material) as prescribed by the department (second BMP 49--Rule 3.f.i. Wherever possible, buck trees alternative). in such a manner that the tree or any part thereof No references were found. will fall away from any Class I streams. No references were found. BMP 68--Rule 3.f.iii. Deposit waste material from construction or maintenance of landings in geologi- BMP SO-Rule 3.f.i. Wherever possible, limb trees cally stable locations outside ofthe appropriate stream in such a manner that the tree or any part thereof protection zone. will fall away from any Class I streams. No references were found. See the General Erosion No references were found. Research Summary regarding geologically stable BMP 61-Rule 3.f.i. Continuously remove slash locations. that enters Class I streams as a result of harvesting BMP 69-Rule 3.f.iii. Deposit waste material from operations. construction or maintenance of skid trails in geologi- Megahan and others 1995, Silver Creek Study Area, cally stablelocationsoutside ofthe appropriate stream Boise National Forest-In a paired watershed study of protection zone. the effects of helicopter logging and broadcast burn- No references were found. See the General Erosion ing, logging slash that fell into streams was removed Research summary regarding geologically stable by hand after the logging was completed. locations. The year following logging was the only year (of 7 BMP 60-Rule 3.f.iii. Deposit waste material from years analyzed) that the unlogged watershed had construction or maintenance of fire trails in geologi- more sediment stored behind channel obstructions. cally stable locations outsideofthe appropriate stream (There was no statistically significant difference be- protection zone. tween the two watersheds in channel sediment stor- No references were found. See the General Erosion age behind obstructions in any of the years before or Research Summary regarding geologically stable after logging.) The authors hypothesized that slash locations. BMP 61-Rule 3.f.i~.Place waste resulting from Clayton and Kennedy (1985, p. 1047)found minimal logging operations(such as crankcase oil, filters,grease, losses of nutrients in solution and in sediments for the and oil containers) outside of Class I and Class I1 first 4 years after clearcut logging and slash burning stream protection zones. in the Silver Creek Study Area. Buffer strips were No references were found. credited as one factor limiting movement of large amounts of nutrients mobilized by slash burning and decay, and for limiting sediment delivery to streams. Rule 3.g. Stream Protection In a companion study on the same watershed, Megahan Twenty BMP's (62 through 81) were evaluated. and others (1995) found that total annual sediment Practice 62 is the general rule 3.g.: "During and after yields were increased an average of 97 percent for 10 forest practice operations, protect streambeds and years after treatment. About 94 percent of the in- streamside vegetation to maintain water quality." creased sediment yield was attributed to accelerated The remaining BMP's address four main topics: surface erosion (resulting primarily from broadcast burning) on the cutting units; a maximum of 6 percent Stream crossings during skidding (BMP's 63 was attributed to a mass erosion site on the cutting through 68); units. The sediment from the mass erosion site was Cable yarding within the stream protection zone delivered directly to the stream. Sediment delivery (BMP's 69 and 70); ratios could not be ascertained from the available Vegetation management in Class I stream protec- data. tion zones (BMP's 71 through 80); Based on their analyses of slope stability in the Soil protection in Class I1 stream protection zones Idaho Batholith, Gray and Megahan (1981, pp. 20-21) (BMP 81). recommended leaving buffer zones of undisturbed Two references were found regarding stream cross- vegetation along all streams during clearcut logging ings. In a paired watershed study near Pierce, operations. Several studies reported in the General Bachmann (1958, pp. 23,34-35) found that skidding Erosion Research Summary show the importance of logs across the creek increased turbidities and stream vegetation in soil stabilization. See the road buffer blockages due to damming by slash and debris. strip rules (BMPYs86 through 88). Turbidities were 100 parts per million when logs were being skidded across the stream. Measured pretreat- Research Results by Best Management ment turbidities on the same stream were less than 7 Practice parts per million; on the control watershed they were less than 6 parts per million throughout the 3-year BMP 62--Rule 3.g. During and after forest practice study period. Near Idaho City, Haupt and Kidd (1965, operations, protect streambeds and streamside veg- p; 668) observed sedimentation effects downstream etationto maintain water quality and aquatic habitat. from skid trail stream crossings. See more specific rules in 3.g.i., 3.g.ii., 3.g.iii., and No research was found on cable yarding within 3.g.i~.(BMP's 63 through 81). stream protection zones. BMP 63-Rule 3.g.i. Avoid tracked or wheeled skid- Only one study was found that actually compared ding in or through streams. water quality in logged areas with and without stream- side buffer strips. In the Priest River Experimental Bachmann 1958, Crystal and Silver Creeks near Forest, Snyder (1973) compared physical and chemi- Pierce, and Simmons Creeks near Avery-Skid- cal properties upstream and downstream of areas that ding of logs across Crystal Creek increased turbidities had been clearcut and that had the slash burned. For and stream blockages due to slash and debris dams (p. paired sampling stations with buffer strips, the only 23). Turbidities were 100 parts per million when logs parameters with significant increases between the were being skidded across the stream. Measured pre- upstream and downstream stations were electrical treatment turbidities on the same stream were less conductivity, bicarbonate, sulfate, calcium, and mag- than 7 parts per million; on the control watershed they nesium. For paired sampling stations without buffer were less than 6 parts per million throughout the strips, all of those parameters showed significant 3-year study period (pp. 3435). differences; in addition, pH, turbidity, suspended sol- Haupt and Kidd 1965, Boise Basin Experimental ids, and potassium showed significant differences. Forest near Idaho City-In this study, logs were skid- Parameters showing no significant differences included ded across streams only when it was impractical to do chloride, nitrate, and sodium. Buffer strips may re- otherwise (p. 665). There were 58 skid trail channel duce suspended solids by blocking the movement of crossings in the 16logged watersheds (p. 666). Follow- sediment and confining the flow of water to existing ing use, skid trails were seeded, and cross ditched or stable channels (pp. 64-65). covered with slash (p. 665). Although no quantitative data were reported, it was noted that the only sedi- wide on Benton and Ida Creeks, and 100 feet wide on ment found in streams due to skidding was in areas Canyon Creek (pp. 7,9,11). immediately downstream of the skid trail crossings For paired sampling stations with buffer strips, the (p. 668). only parameters with significant increases between BMP *Rule 3.g.i. Install adequate temporary the upstream and downstream stations were electri- cal conductivity, bicarbonate, sulfate, calcium, and structures to carry streamflow when streams must be magnesium. For paired sampling stations without crossed. all No references were found. buffer strips, those parameters again showed sig- nificant differences; in addition, pH, turbidity, sus- BMP 66-Rule 3.g.i. Cross a stream at right angles pended solids, and potassium showed significant dif- to its channel if at all possible. ferences. Parameters showingno significant difference No references were found. included chloride, nitrate, and sodium. BMP 66--Rule 3.g.i. Comply with the Stream Chan- Buffer strips may reduce suspended solids by block- nel Protection Act when constructing hydraulic struc- ing the movement of sediment and confining the flow tures in streams. of water to existing stable channels (pp. 64-65). No references were found. Gray and Megahan 1981, Pine Creek Study Area, BMP 67-Rule 3.g.i. Remove all temporary cross- Middle Fork of the Payette River Drainage, Boise ings immediately after use. National Forest-Several analyses evaluated the con- No references were found. tributions offorest vegetationto slope stability through various mechanisms. The authors recommended leav- BMP 68-Rule 3.g.i. Water bar the ends of skid ing buffer zones of trees above and below haul roads, trails near channel crossings where applicable. and leaving buffer zones of undisturbed vegetation No references were found specific to water bars on along all streams during clearcut logging operations the ends of skid trails near channel crossings; see Rule (pp. 20-21). 3.e.i., water bar rule (BMP 30) for generalinformation on the effectiveness of water bars on skid trails. Clayton andKennedy 1985, Silver Creek Study Area, Boise National Forest-A paired watershed approach BMP 69-Rule 3.g.ii. Minimize streambankvegeta- was used to evaluate changes in nutrient budgets of tion disturbance when cable yarding is necessary six elements (potassium,calcium, magnesium, sulfur, across or inside stream protection zones. phosphorus, and nitrogen) following clearcut logging, No specific references were found. See the General helicopter yarding, and broadcast burning of slash. Erosion Research Summary for information on Buffer strip widths averaged 15 meters for first- and vegetation's effectiveness in stabilizing soil. second-order channels, and 30 meters for the third- BMP 70-Rule 3.g.ii. Minimize channeldisturbance order main channel (pp. 1042-1043). Nitrate-nitrogen when cable yarding is necessary across or inside stream in streamwater increased about 10 times for the 4 protection zones. years after logging; no other treatment effects were No references were found. . apparent in the stream solution chemistry (pp. 1045- 1046). There were small but significant changes in 71-Rule 3.g.iii. Provide the large organic BMP stream sediment nutrient transport for all elements debris (LOD),shading, soil stabilization,wildlife cover the third year following logging (p. 1046). and water filtering effects of vegetation along Class I Nutrient losses in solution and in sediments were streams. characterized as "minimally accelerated" (p. 1047). All the references found on the effectiveness of Buffer strips were credited as one factor limiting buffer strips between cutting units and streams are movement of large amounts of nutrients mobilized by cited below. They do not distinguish between Class I slash burning and decay, and limiting the delivery of and Class streams. I1 sediment to streams (p. 1047). See Rule 4.b.i., buffer strips below roads (BMP's 86 through 88) and the General Erosion Research Sum- Megahan 1987, and Megahan and others 1995, mary for information on vegetation's effectiveness in Silver Creek Study Area, Boise National Forest-In a stabilizing soil. paired watershed study, the treated watershed was helicopter logged; slash was broadcast burned. Buffer Snyder 1973, Benton Creek, Ida Creek, and Canyon strips averaging 25 meters wide were left between Creek, Priest River Experimental Forest-Water was cuttingunits and perennial streams. Vegetationwithin sampled for various physical and chemical properties the buffer strips was undisturbed, except that trees at stations upstream and downstream from areas that expected to die before the next timber harvest were had been clearcut logged and had the slash burned. removed. Buffer strips of undisturbed vegetation were 200 feet Total annual sedimentyields at the watershedmouth streams in the given minimum numbers per 1,000 feet were increased an average of 97 percent (or a total of of stream (first alternative). 114 tonnes) for 10 years after treatment. Streamflow No references were found. analyses and studies conducted in the channels indi- BMP 79--Rule 3.g.iii.O. Request a site-specific cated that accelerated channel erosion was not re- riparian management prescription as an alternative sponsible for the increased sediment yields. Rather, to the standing tree and shade requirements for Class I about 94 percent of the increased sediment yield was streams (second alternative). attributed to accelerated surface erosion (resulting No references were found. primarily from broadcast burning) on the cutting units; a maximum of 6 percent was attributed to a mass BMP &Rule $.g.iii.(g). Where the opposite side of erosion site on the cutting units. The sediment from the stream does not currently meet the given mini- the mass erosion site (about 7 tonnes) was delivered mum standing tree requirements, consider a site- directly to the stream. Sediment delivery ratios could specific riparian prescription that meets the large not be ascertained from the available data. organic debris needs of the stream (Class I). No references were found. BMP 72-Rule 3.g.iii.(a). Leave hardwood trees wherever they afford shade over a stream or maintain BMP 81-Rule 3.g.i~.Provide soil stabilization and the integrity of the soil near a stream (Class I). water filtering effects along Class I1 streams by leav- No specific references were found. See Rule 3.g.iii., ing undisturbed soils in widths sdticient to prevent general buffer strip rule (BMP 71), and the General washing of sediment into Class I streams. In no case Erosion Research Summary. shall this widthbe less than 5 feet slope distance above the ordinary high water mark on each side of the BMP 73--Rule 3.g.iii.(a). Leave shrubs wherever stream. they afford shade over a stream or maintain the See rule 3.g.iii., Class I buffer zones (BMP 71); rule integrity of the soil near a stream (Class I). 4.b.i., buffer strips below roads (BMP's 86 through 88); No specific references were found. See Rule 3.g.iii., and the General Erosion Research Summary. general buffer strip rule (BMP 71), and the General Erosion Research Summary. BMP 74-Rule S.g.iii.(a). Leave grasses wherever Rule 3.h. Maintenance of Productivity they afford shade over a stream or maintain the and Related Values integrity of the soil near a stream (Class I). No specific references were found. See Rule 3.g.iii., Three BMPs (82 through 84)were evaluated. These general buffer strip rule (BMP 71), and the General comprise the "wet areas" Rule 3.h.iii.: 'When conduct- Erosion Research Summary. ing operations along bogs, swamps, wet meadows, springs, seeps, wet draws, or other sources where the BMP 75--Rule 3.g.iii.(a). Leave rocks wherever presence of water is indicated, protect soil and vegeta- they afford shade over a stream or maintain the tion from disturbance that wouldcause adverse effects integrity of the soil near a stream (Class I). on water quality, quantity, and wildlife habitat. Con- No specific references were found. See Rule 3.g.iii., sider leaving buffer strips." Other rules in 3.h. deal general buffer strip rule (BMP 711, and the General with wildlife and esthetic values and were not within Erosion Research Summary. the scope of the BMP project. BMP 76--Rule 3.g.iii.(b). Leave 75 percent of the No research was found specifically addressing the current shade over the stream (Class I). wet area BMPs. See the General Erosion Research No references were found. Summary, the timber harvest buffer strip rule (BMP 71), and the road buffer strip rules (BMP's 86 through BMP 77-Rule 3.g.iii.(c). Carefully log the mature 88). timber from the (Class I) stream protection zone in such a way that shading and filtering effects are not Research Results by Best Management destroyed. No specific references were found. See Rule 3.g.iii., Practice general buffer strip rule (BMP 71), and the General Erosion Research Summary. BMP 82-Rule 3.h.iii. When conducting operations along lakes, bogs, swamps, wet meadows, springs, BMP 78-Rule 3.g.iii.(d). and (e). Leave standing seeps or other sources where the presenceof water is trees, including , hardwoods, and snags (snags indicated, protect soil from disturbance that would within given limitations), within 50 feet of the ordi- cause adverse effects on water quality, water quan- nary high water mark on each side of all Class I tity, wildlife habitat, and aquatic habitat. No specific references were found. See the General No specific references were found. See the General Erosion Research Summary; Rule 3.g.iii., timber har- Erosion Research Summary; Rule 3.g.iii., timber har- vest buffer strips (BMP 71); and Rule 4.b.i., road buffer vest buffer strips (BMP 71); and Rule 4.b.i., road buffer strips (BMP's 86 through 88). strips (BMP's 86 through 88). BlMP 83-Rule 3.h.iii. When conducting operations BMP 84--Rule 3.h.iii. When conducting operations along lakes, bogs, swamps, wet meadows, springs, along lakes, bogs, swamps, wet meadows, springs, seeps or other sources where the presence of water is seeps or other sources where the presence of water is indicated, protect vegetation from disturbance that indicated, consider leaving buffer strips. would cause adverse effects on water quality, water No specific references were found. See Rule 3.g.iii., quantity, wildlife habitat, and aquatic habitat. timber harvest buffer strips (BMP 71); and Rule 4.b.i., road buffer strips (BMP's 86 through 88). Rule 4. Road Construction and Maintenance Rule 4.b. Road Specifications and Several reports of fillslope erosion in the Horse Creek Study Area showed that erosion increased with Plans fill height (Cook and King 1983, pp. 3-4; King 1979, Twenty-four BMP's (85 through 108) were evalu- pp. 5,6; King 1981, p. 83; Tennyson and others 1981, ated. Five major themes regarding road planning are: pp. 13,15, 16). In the Gospel Hump area, fill length and vertical fill height (alongwith time since construc- Minimum disturbance, including minimum road tion) were the best predictors of fill erosion volumes, standard, minimum cut and fill volumes, and and were also highly correlated with sediment trans- minimum road width (BMP's 85, 89 through 91, port distances (Carlton and others 1982, pp. 31, 32, 93,941; 39). In the Idaho Batholith, Megahan (1974a, p. 11) Road buffer strips: minimum road construction reported greater tree growth in the upper fourth of fills within the stream protection zone, and providing averaging 200 feet in length. The study showed that for vegetation between roads and streams (BMP's the planted trees significantly reduced surface erosion 86 through 88); (pp. 13-14); other research studies indicated that Disposition of excavated material (BMP's 92,95, the trees should also reduce the risk of mass erosion 96); (pp. 2-31. Road drainage, culverts, and stream crossings Several studies in the Idaho Batholith addressed the (BMP's 97 through 107); importance of fillslope gradient with respect to surface Reuse and reconstruction of existing roads (BMP andmass erosion. Jensen and Cole (1965, p. 13)reported 108). that the major cause of fill failures in the South Fork Salmon River drainage was the location of roads on Minimum Disturbance steep slopes when the natural angle ofrepose ofthe fill Several studies have implications for roadcut vol- material (67 percent or 1.5:l) was exceeded or ap- umes. Two studies (Burroughs and others 1972, p. 11; proached too closely to allow a margin of safety. They Megahan 1972,p. 355) showed that even relatively low recommended that fills be built at an angle of 50 roadcuts can intercept significant amounts of surface percent or 2:l (p. 13); if fill lengths are limited, this and subsurface snowmelt runoff, disturbing slope hy- puts constraints on road siting based on hill slope drology and creating potential road drainage and gradients (p. 14). Investigations of slope failures (Gonsior and Gardner 1971, pp. 30-31) revealed that erosion problems. ' In the Horse Creek Study Area, ditch aggradation slope steepness was a major factor in all road-associ- increased as cut height increased (Tennyson and oth- ated failures. Based on laboratory tests, they recom- ers 1981, pp. 55, 70). Also, as roadcut area or height mended that "no unretained slopes should be allowed increased, cutslope erosion volumes increased (King in excess of 35 degrees, or 70 percent, on roadfills." It 1981, pp. 83,101; Tennyson and others 1981, pp. 16, was also noted that steep slopes were more prone to 21). However, in the Silver Creek Study Area, cut surface erosion of fine particles. However, for plot height was not a significant variable in predicting studies in the Silver Creek Study Area, fillslope gradi- surface erosion (Boise State University, Department ent was not a statistically significant predictor of of Geology and Geophysics 1984, pp. 16,30,31). sediment yield over the range of the data set, 34 to 41 The Silver Creek study correlated cutslope gradient degrees (Megahan and others 1991, pp. 54-56;Megahan with cutslope erosion (p. 18). The same conclusion was and others 1992). reached in a study of long-term (45-year) cutslope Hartsog and Gonsior (1973, p. 6) reported that erosion in the same area (Megahan and others 1983, roadfills designed for 67 percent, but constructed at pp. 24, 25). The authors recommended constructing the angle of repose (70-80 percent), showed sloughing cutslopes at lower gradients on gentle terrain and and settlement cracks and eroded during a high- using terraced slopes on steeper terrain (p. 27). On the intensity rainstorm. Megahan (1974a, p. 1)noted that other hand, Gonsior and Gardner (1971, p. 33) recom- investigations by the Payette National Forest con- mended building cuts "as steep as possible consistent cluded that fills constructed at angles exceeding the with subsurface conditions."Megahan andBohn(l989, natural angle of repose could not be stabilized by grass P. 508) noted that progressive mass failures can occur seeding (p. 1). at relatively low slope gradients under certain condi- Some studies looked at combinations of cut, fill, and tions of subsurface flow; hazards are increased if tread. Based on investigations of mass failures in the timber has been harvested above the roadcut (p. 509). Idaho Batholith, Gonsior and Gardner (1971, p. 33) Jensen and Finn (1966, p. 8) suggested that on glacial recommended sacrificingroad alignment to avoid deep moraine lands, roadcuts should be laid back to 1.5:l or cuts and fills. Similarly, Hartsog and Gonsior (1973, 67 percent, to prevent round -packed boulders p. 21) recommended minimizing heights of cuts and from rolling out of the roadcut. fills, and tread width toreduce road erosion. Ketcheson and Megahan (1990, pp. 4-51found that sediment flow (1)Depressions made by pushed-over or wind-thrown volume and travel distances increased as total source trees, or a wavy ground surface; areas (including cut, fill, tread, andundisturbed sIopes (2) Logs thicker than 4 inches; contributing sediment) increased. Earlier investiga- (3) Rocks more than four inches wide at ground tions by Haupt (1959b, pp. 330-331) suggested that fill surface; length, but not cut height or road width, predicted flow (4) Trees and stumps; distance. Packer (1967, pp. 12-13) did not find cut, fill, (5) Slash and brush; or tread dimension variables to be significant predic- (6) Grass, weeds, and shrubs. tors of sediment flow distance. The relative importance of cut, fill, and tread as Using this classification for 720 sites in Idaho and sources of surface and mass erosion were discussed in Montana, Packer (1967, pp. 12-13) reported that ob- several reports (Arnold and Lundeen 1968, p. 117; struction spacing, and the interaction of obstruction Burroughs and King 1989, p. 16; Jensen and Cole spacing and obstruction type, were the variables most 1965, p. 11; Jensen and Finn 1966, p. 70; King 1981, highly related to sediment transport; initial obstruc- p. 106; Megahan and Kidd 1972a, pp. 10-11; Megahan tion distance was also significant(ranking fifth among and others 1979, p. 131). See Research Results by Best the variables). Management Practice, BMP 85, Road Construction c In the Gospel Hump area, the obstructionindex was and Maintenance, for details. a statistic- significant variable in explaining sedi- Three studies specifically addressed road standard. ment transport distances (Carlton and others 1982, Megahan and others (1979, p. 131) found that as road pp. 38-39). In this case, the obstruction index was a standardincreased, so did the frequency of landslides. measure of the relative efficiency of obstructions in They attributed the increased landslides to the in- blocking the flow of sediment (pp. 17,82). Ketcheson creased volume of material excavated. King (1981, p. and Megahan (1990, p. 11)noted that obstructions can 76) noted that regardless of the intended road stan- deflect or stop sediment flow if they are large, in dard, the area disturbed was often a function of topo- contad with the ground, and oriented perpendicular graphical constraints and location of the road within to the fall line of the slope. Small stems are generally the landscape. In the Horse Creek Study Area, road ineffective in deflecting or stopping sediment flow. standard was not as important as sideslope character- Based on Ketcheson and Megahan's study, Burton istics in predicting sediment transport distance (King (n.d., p. 2) reported a strong correlation between sedi- 1979, p. 9). ment storage behind obstructions and lengths of sedi- ment flow in the Silver Greek Study Area. Length of Road Buffer Strips obstructions was one of four variables in an equation predicting sediment flow travel distances (p. 3). Twelve studies reported on sediment movement Filter windrows are a special kind of obstruction below roads; some of these tried to identify the vari- purposely placed at the toe of the fill. Research in the ables controlling the distance of sediment movement. Horse Creek Study Area (Burroughs and King 1989, Variables that seem to be important include: obstruc- p. 9; Cook and King 1983, p. 4; King 1979, pp. 9-10; tions on the slope, road drainage features, fillslope Tennyson and others 1981, p. 41) has shown slash characteristics, and site characteristics. Time since filter windrows to reduce movement of sediment below construction and weather also play a role. filldopes. The length of windrows constructed at five Several of these studies noted the importance of stream crossings totalled 1,190 feet. Only seven sedi- obstructions (includingvegetation) on the slope below ment flows were observed below the windrowed fills in the road. For example, Haupt (1959b, pp. 330-331) . the 3-year study period; three of these had sediment found that the "slope obstructionindex," related to the delivery to the stream. Breaching of windrows usudy downhill spacing of obstructions, was the variable occurred as a result of slumping when snowmelt satu- most highly related to transport distance. Major slope rated the fill. Average transport distance for sediment obstructions included in the index were "standing flows was 3.8 feet below'windrows. For fills without trees, down snags, logging slash and fallen branches lCilter windrows, the average transport distance was greater than 3 inches in diameter, rock outcrops, 41.4 feet for flows originating in slumps, and 24.2 feet clumps of brush higher than 2 feet, tree stumps, for flows originating in areas that had not slumped hummocks, and natural depressions." Grass and low (Cook and King 1983, pp. 2-4). brush between major obstructions were also consid- Road drainage features are another important fac- ered when computing the index. tor influencing sediment movement below roads. Haupt Packer and Christensen (1964, pp. 7,9) noted that (195913) looked at various road design and site factors slope obstructions vary in their ability to retard sedi- as predictors of sediment flow distance below logging ment flow. The following were listed in order of de- roads that had been "put to bed" (standard logging creasing effectiveness: road closure techniques that include cross ditching and removal oftemporary culverts) (pp. 329-330). This (1967, pp. 12-14),the thirdmost important predictor of analysis showed that the cross ditchinterval squared, sediment transport distance was percentage by weight and the product of cross ditch interval and road gradi- of undisturbed slope soil particles and water-stable ent, ranked second and fourth among the variables aggregates greater than2 mm in diameter. The follow- tested (pp. 330-331). A similar exercise by Packer ing soil groups were listed in order of decreasing (1967, pp. 12-13) showed that of 24 watershed and percentages (and increasing sediment movement)':ba- road characteristics tested as predictors of sediment salt, andesite, glacial silt, hard sediments, granite, movement downslope from logging roads, cross drain and loess. In the Gospel Hump area, sediment flows spacing was fourth in importance. originating from nongranitic fill materials were pre- When roads were being constructed in the Silver dicted to travel about 5 feet farther than those from Creek Study Area, sediment flows associated with granitic fill materials (Carlton and others 1982,p. 47). berm drains or cross drains (relief culverts)had greater In Haupt's study (1959b, p. 331) the lower sideslope volumes and traveled farther than those originating gradient was not significant, which was attributed to on fillslopes (Megahan and others 1986, pp. 35-36). the confounding effect of slope obstructions. However, The same pattern held in the 4 years after construc- in the Horse Creek Study Area, King (1979, pp. 8,9) tion (Ketcheson and Megahan 1990, p. 3). Probability reported that as slope gradient increased, larger vol- distributions were developed for sediment flow vol- umes of sediment were transported greater distances ume and length by source, including relief culverts, in the first year after construction. In the same area, berm drains, and rock drains (pp. 9-10,13-16). Tennyson and others (1981, pp. 43-44) found slope Similarly, in the Horse Creek Study Area, sediment gradient to be a significant predictor of sediment flows influenced by relief culverts (where the source transport distance in the second year following con- gully was below or adjacent to a culvert) tended to struction. Reports from the Silver Creek Study Area travel farther than other flows (Tennyson and others also indicate that gradient influenced sediment 1981, pp. 41-42). Presence or absence of runoff from transport distances (Burton n.d., p. 3; Ketcheson and the road surface was animportant variable in predict- Megahan 1990, p. 5). Sideslope gradient was one of ing sediment flow distance (p. 44). Burroughs and four independent variables in the equation predicting King (1989, p. 10)developed'frequency distributions of transport (Burton n.d., p. 3). sediment transport distance for flows influenced by Despite this research on sediment transport below relief culverts, and for travelway runoff compared roads, transport is still difEcult to predict accurately with no travelway runoff, based on the Horse Creek due to the numerous interacting variables (Burroughs data. and King 1989, p. 8). While individual variables may Fillslope characteristics that appear to influencethe test highly significant, the predictive multiple regres- distance of sediment transport include fillslope length sion equations generally have low r-squared values, or height, cover density, gullying or slumping, bulk indicating they predict only a small fiaction of the density, and parent material. The relation between variability (Carlton and others 1982,pp. 39-40; Packer sediment transport and fillslope length or vertical 1967, p. 13; Tennyson and others 1981, pp. 41, 44). height was discussed in the previous section on mini- Another approach is to report the distribution of sedi- mum disturbance. See Haupt 1959b, pp. 331-332; ment flows in time and space. Several such reports are Tennyson and others 1981, pp. 43-44; Carlton and available (Burroughs andKing 1989, pp. 9-11; Carlton others 1982, pp. 38-39. Fillslope cover density was the and others 1982, p. 38; Haupt and Kidd 1965, p. 668; seventh most important variable in Packer's (1967, Ketcheson and Megahan 1990, pp. 3,9-10,12-16; King pp. 13,15-16) analysis of sediment transport distance. 1979, pp. 6,8,9; Megahan 1991, p. 146;Megahan and Several reports from the Horse Creek Study Area others 1986, pp. 35-36; Tennyson and others 1981,pp. indicate that sediment transport distances increase 39,41,42,44); see Research Results by Best Manage- as source gully volume increases (King 1979, p. 6; ment Practice for BMPYs86 through 88. This approach Tennyson and others 1981, pp. 43-44); slumped mate- may provide useful information, but the unique cir- rial is transported greater distances than unslumped cumstancesof site conditions, road design, and weather material (Burroughs and King 1989, p. 9; Cook and that produced a given data set are unlikely to be King 1983,p. 4; Tennysonandothers 1981,p. 41). Bulk duplicated elsewhere. density of fill material was a significant predictor of Buffer strips may be desirable not only for limiting transport distance in the Gospel Hump area (Carlton sediment delivery from roads to streams, but also for and others 1982, pp. 38-40). Parent material will be reducing mass and surface erosion. For example, discussed in the next section. Gonsior and Gardner (1971, pp. 31-32 ) recommended Site characteristics potentially important to sedi- leaving trees below roadfills because tree roots en- ment transport include the parent material and the hance soil stability by mechanical reinforcement and sideslope gradient. For example, in Packer's analyses by removing moisture. Similarly, Gray and Megahan (1981, pp. 20-21) suggested leaving trees above and of importance, were: road surface stability, road surface below haul roads, based on their analyses of the grade, topographic position, aspect, and upper slope contributions of forest vegetation to slope stability steepness (pp. 6-71. The regression equation (p. 6) was through various mechanisms. See the General Ero- used to develop a table (p. 11) that gives cross drain sion Research Summary for more information on the spacings by road grade and soil type with adjustments influence of vegetation on surface and mass erosion. for topographic position, aspect, slope steepness, and the percent of cases in which 1-inch rill formation is Disposition of Excavated Material prevented. This table is found on page 14 of the report by Packer and Christensen (1964), who also provided Only one reference was found. Clayton and Arnold guidelines for installation of some cross drainage struc- (1972, p. 16) suggested borrowing fill for placement in tures (pp. 33-36). areas of very well weathered granitic rock, to promote Te~ysonand others (1981) measured ditch aggra- fillslope stability. See the General Erosion Research dation and degradation on a newly constructed road. Summary for information on geologically stable sites. During snowmelt periods, ditches generally degraded (deepened); distance between culverts and road gradi- Road Drainage, Culverts, Stream Crossings ent were significantly and positively correlated with Four reports were found that compared the relative degradation (pp. 55, 70). During the first snowmelt merits of insloping with outsloping (Burroughs and period, ditches on roads withgradients of 6 to 9 percent King 1989, p. 16; Gonsior and Gardner 1971, p. 33; degraded an average of 0.122 feet (p. 55). During Hartsog and Gonsior 1973, p. 20; Haupt and others summer, aggradation (filling) was more common; 1963, p. 8). All concluded that insloping was generally aggradation was significantly and positively corre- preferable; outsloping requires special attention to lated with cutslope height (p. 70). In general, deposi- road design, erosion control measures, and maintenance. tion was observed in the first 100 feet of the ditch; Dips, water bars, and cross drains were discussed in erosion increased with increasing distances along the four references. Haupt and others (1963, pp. 6-7)noted ditch (pp. 57-58). that earthen cross drains spaced 30 to 90 feet apart Experiments with simulated rainfall on the Nez generated erosion on both insloped and outsloped road Perce National Forest indicate that degradation of an sections during severe storms. If earthen cross drains unprotected ditch might produce more sediment than are used, they recommended draining them on the an unprotected road tread on roads with low volumes outcurve (p. 8). Based on their analyses of the contri- of traffic (Burroughs and King 1989, p. 14). In these butions of vegetation to slope stability, Gray and experiments (Burroughs and others 1983b, p. 14), the Megahan (1981, p. 21) recommended that road cross ratio of sediment yields were: drainage structures should drain onto undisturbed (unrocked ditch + untreated cutslope) : vegetation. (rocked ditch + untreated cutslope) = 2.29. Both Haupt (1959b, pp. 330-331) and Packer (1967, Burroughs and King (1989, pp. 13-14) outline proce- pp. 13-14) found spacing of cross drainage structures dures for designing roadside ditch riprap for forest to be a significant variable with respect to sediment roads. flow distance. Haupt (1959a)used his regression equa- In the Silver Creek Study Area, results from tion to develop tables for use in road design, construc- preconstruction seismic and resistivity surveys were tion, and abandonment. Various tables can be used to used to accurately predict the necessary drainage estimate the buffer strip widths, cross ditch interval, design and to plan underdrain installation on a new or slope obstruction index to minimize sediment deliv- collector road (Clayton 1983, p. 5). ery to streams for a wide range of road and site Several studies reported on sediment movement characteristics (pp. 9-20). Similarly, Packer (1967) below relief culverts (Burroughs and King 1989; developed a table (pp. 16-17) using his regression Ketcheson and Megahan 1990; Megahan and others equation (p. 12) to define buffer strip width given 1986; Te~ysonand others 1981). These studies were obstruction spacing and obstruction types with adjust- summarized under "Road Buffer Strips" (pp. 30-31). ments for soil type, cross drain spacing, distance to Gray and Megahan (1981, p. 21) recommended leav- initial obstruction, fillslope cover density, the percent ing undisturbed vegetation in areas large enough to of erosion prevention, and so forth. A table with the accommodate road drainage (water spreading areas) same information also appears in the publication by based on their analyses of slope stability. Megahan Packer and Christensen (1964, pp. 15-17). and others (1979, p. 131) studied the relationship Packer (1967) also investigated cross drain spacing between culverts and landslide frequency, volume, needed to prevent formation of road surface rills ex- and delivery. Twenty-seven percent of road-associated ceeding 1inch in depth. Significant variables, in order slides originated on roadfills without culverts, compared to 7 percent on fills with culverts. Thirty- Hartsog and Gonsior (1973, p. 21) stressed the need one percent of the volume from road-associated slides for careful planning to control sediment from the originated on fills without culverts, compare3 to 21 road's cutslope and ditch. They recommended routing percent on fills with culverts. Fifty-one percent of the water down the road surface rather than along the toe road-associated slide material delivered to streams of the cutslope. They also recommended providing for originated on fills without culverts, compared to 16 sediment filtering or settling before runoff leaves the percent that originated on fills with culverts. road surface, or for discharging drainage far enough Several reports addressed culvert installation and away from streams to provide for water infiltration stream crossings. Innorthern Idaho, Bachmann (1958, and clarification. pp. 22,35,37) observed temporarily increased turbid- ity and a sediment deposit associated with culvert Reconstruction of Existing Roads installation. Increases in sedimentation and turbidity were noted at crossings of some small tributaries No references specifically addressed reconstruction (p. 25). Over the course of the study, increases in versus new road construction; however, numerous turbidity were noted only during rain, snowmelt, and references show that total erosion or erosion on vari- direct channel disturbances; sediment sources were ous components of the road prism decreases over time predominantly at stream crossings (pp. 35, 37). Al- (ranging fiom the first season to the first 3 years). though turbidity sampling was not adequate to define Megahan (1974b) has the largest data set spanning average or maximum values (p. 37), turbidity differ- the longest time. He has dealt most directly with the ences were apparent above and below road crossings trend of erosion. He developed a negative exponential equation showing surface erosion on severely dis- (p. 35). In the Horse Creek Study Area, sediment increases turbed granitic soils over time. By far the greatest were observed when roads were pioneered, temporary percentage of erosion occurs in the first and second culverts were placed, slash was cleared from the right- years after construction (p. 12). In the first year, of-way, and culverts were permanently installed (King erosion rates are about 1,000 times greater than on 1981, pp. 62,67). Routing the streamflow around the undisturbed lands (p. 12). Additional disturbances construction site when culverts were permanently result in new cycles of surface erosion (p. 13). installed, "dewatering," reduced sedimentation (King and Gonsior 1980, p. 9). Shortly after construction, Research Results by Best Management sediment concentrations at the crossings returned to Practice preconstructionlevels,except duringrainstorms.Then, BMP 86-Rule 4.b. Plan each road to the minimum sediment loads were about 100 to 1,000 times higher use standards adapted to the terrain and soil materi- than normal (p. 11).During the first snowmelt period als to minimize disturbances and damage to forest following construction, considerable sediment was productivity, water quality, and wildlife habitat. generated at crossings (p. 11).The following summer To avoid repetition, and to consider interactions (1 year after construction), sediment loads during among variables, this rule will be combined with the storms were about 10 times higher than normal (p. 15). rules for minimum road width, minimum cut volumes, Three references provided recommendationsfor cul- and minimum fill volumes (BMP's 89, 90, and 91). vert design and installation. Based on their observa- Each reference will indicate whether it pertains to tions of storm damage to logging roads, Haupt and road standard, road width, roadcut volume, roadfill others (1963, p. 8) recommended that culverts placed volume, or some combination. See the General Erosion in major ravines be laid on the original grade so that Research Summary regarding the requirement they drain into the original channel rather than on the "adapted to the terrain and soil materials." fill of the incurve. Hartsog and Gonsior (1973) recom- It is intuitively clear that minimizing the area dis- mended skewing culverts or using downspouts to turbed in cuts, tread and ditch, or fill should reduce avoid steep culvert gradients that result in scour erosion. However, other factors such as cut and fill (p. 10). They also discussed proper bedding of culverts angles must also be considered. and compaction of backfill material (p. 12). Gonsior and Gardner (1971, p. 12) measured low soil perme- Haupt 1959a,b, width, cut, fill, Little Owl Creek abilities in their investigations of slope failures, not- watershed, basin-Haupt (1959b), tested ing that decreasing permeability over time must be seven variables, including road width, roadcut height, accounted for in culvert planning. They stressed the and embankment slope length as predictors of sedi- need to evaluate surface and subsurface flow con- ment flow distance below logging haul roads that had ditions when locating and designing roads (p. 33). No been "put to bed" (standard logging road closure references were found on planning culvert installation techniques that include cross ditching and removal of to provide for fish passage. temporary culverts). Multiple regression analysis showed that the "slope obstruction index" was the most highly related, followed by the cross ditch however, none of these appeared in the ha1multiple- interval squared, the embankment slope length, and regression equation (p. 12). the product of cross ditch interval and road gradieht (pp. 330-331). In the regression equation, an increase Arnold and LuncEeen 1968, width, cut, fill, South Fork Salmon River 'drainage-A survey of erosion on of 1foot of embankment slope length increases sedi- the roads producing the highest sediment levels indi- ment flow distance by about 3.5 feet Cp. 332). The range cated that 65 percent of sediment originated from of embankment slope lengths used to develop the fillslopes, 10 percent from cutslopes and ditches, 21 equation was 1to 32 feet (p. 331). Haupt (1959a) cau- percent from maintenance wasting of cutslope mate- tioned against extrapolating beyond a 20-foot embank- rial, and 4 percent f?om road surfaces (p. 117). ment slope length (p. 6). Gomior and Gardner 1971, cut, fill, Zena Creek Jensen and Cole 1965, fill, South Fork Salmon River drainage, Payette National Forest-Investigations of drainage-A survey of mass erosion during an April slope failures revealed that slope steepness was a 1965 rain and snowmelt event showed that 77.5 per- major factor in all road-associated failures. Based on cent of the landslides originated on roadfills (p. 11). laboratory tests, the authors recommended that "no The major cause of fill failures was the location of unretained slopes should be allowed in excess of 35 roads on steep slopes such that the natural angle of degrees, or 70 percent, on roadfills." They also noted repose of the fill material (67 percent or 1.5:l) was that steep slopes were more prone to surface erosion of exceeded or approached too closely to allow a margin fine particles (pp. 30-31). of safety(p. 13).They recommended building fills at an The authors recommended buiIding cutslopes, "as angle of 50 percent or 2:l (p. 13). If fills are to be less steep as possible consistent with subswtkce condi- than 100 feet long, this recommendation would limit tions," and sacrificing alignment to avoid deep fills or construction to slopes with gradients less than or cuts (p. 33). equal to 45 percent. If fills are to be less than 50 feet , long, this recommendation would limit construction to Burroughs and others 1972, cut, near Lolo Pass at slopes with gradients less than or equal to 38 percent the Idaho-Montana border-Substantial volumes of (P. 14). water were intercepted at roadcuts with an average ' height of 36 inches (p. 3) during the snowmelt season Jensen and Finn 1966, width, cut, fill, Zena Creek in the deep snow zone (p. 11). Subsurface seepage Logging Study Area, Payette National Forest-Rates averaged 58 percent of the total, the remainder oc- are given for average yearly surface erosion from cut, curred as overland flow (p. 10). In the central Idaho tread or ditch, and fill. Informationis provided for four Batholith, such overland flow from snowmelt is sel- landtypes: strongly glaciatedgranitic soils, periglacial dom observed(p. 12). See Megahan (1972)for informa- (ice action mainly on site) granitic soils, river terrace tion on a similar study in the Idaho Batholith. lands, and decomposed granitic soils. For strongly glaciated granitic soils and river terrace lands, the Megahan 1972, cut, Pine Creek, Boise National For- values for all road prism components are 0.1 inch est-Subsurface flow interceptionwas measured along surface erosion per year. For periglacial granitic soils, roadcuts deep enough to expose bedrock (average soil the cut value is 0.2 inch, the tread and ditch and the fill depth was about 31 inches) in first order watersheds values are 0.1 inch. For the decomposed granitic soils, (p. 351). Subsurface flow was intercepted only during the cut value is 1.0 inch, the treadandditchvalue is 0.1 the spring snowmelt period (p. 353). The volume of inch, and the fill value is 0.5 inch (p. 70). flow intercepted was about 7.3 times greater than the The authors recommend minimizing roadcutting estimated snowmelt runoff from the road area alone operations on decomposed granitic soils and on the (p. 355). About 35 percent of the total subsurface flow face of river terraces (pp. 4,8,28,32,62). On decom- was intercepted by the roadcut (p. 355). More subsur- posed granitic soils, road construction on slopes over face flow was intercepted in drainage bottoms, but 45 percent requires slope stabihationmeasures(p. 8). flow was not limited to those areas (p. 353). On glacial moraine lands, roadcuts should be reduced See Burroughs and others (1972) for information on in steepness to 1.5:l or 67 percent, to prevent round a similar study. glacier-packedboulders from rolling out ofthe roadcut Megahan and Kidd 1972a, width, cut, fill, Zena (p. 8). Creek Study Area, Payette National Forest-Time Packer 1967, width, cut, fill, 720 sites in Idaho and trends for erosion on logging roads were discussed. Montana-Twenty-five road and watershed charac- High initial erosion rates were largely due to fillslope teristics were tested as predictors of sediment erosion; these high rates could be avoided by fill movement distance downslope from road cross drains stabilization methods (p. 11). Continued accelerated (pp. 4-5). Among these variables were cut height and road erosion rates were expected due to erosion of gradient, fill length and gradient, and road width; weathered granitic bedrock on the road tread and 33 percent of the slide material delivered to streams steep cutslopes (p. 10). originated on cuts, 51 percent originated on fills with- Hartsog and Gonsior 1973, width, cut, fill, south out culverts, and 16 percent originated on fills with Fork Salmon River drainage, Payette National For- culverts (p. 131). est-During the construction period and the early When roads were built to lower standards, landslide period of use, an engineeringresearch team evaluated frequency decreased, presumably because less exca- a road designed to minimize watershed impacts. Fills vation was required. The average number of slides per that had been designed for 67 percent, but constructed kilometer ofroad was 2.2 for arterial, 1.2 for collector, at the angle of repose (70 to 80 percent), showed 0.6 for service, and0.2 for temporary or terminalroads sloughing and settlement cracks, and also eroded (p. 131). during a high-intensity rainstorm (p. 6). The primary King 1981, standard, cut, fill, Horse Creek Study recommendation for future projects was to minimize Area, Nez Perce National Forest-Length of fillslopes heights of cuts and fills, and widths of tread, sacrific- was controlled largely by topographical constraints; ing road alignment as necessary (p. 21). roads designed to minimize cuts and fills (Standard 11) Megahan 1974a, fill, Deadwood River drainage, always disturbed a greater area than the higher stan- Boise National Forest-Previous investigationsby the dard roads (Standard I) due to steeper sideslopes in Payette National Forest concluded that fills constructed the areas where Standard I1 roads were constructed, at angles exceeding the natural angle of repose could Both road standards had fill gradients of 1.5:l (p. 76). not be stabilized by grass seeding (p. 1).This study Road erosion data were evaluated for 1 to 3 years investigated roadfill surface erosion control from vari- after construction. As the area of roam increased, ous combinations of tree planting, tree seeding, fertil- winter erosion increased (p. 81). As roadcut area izing, mulching, and netting (pp. 5-6). increased, total cutslope erosion increased (p. 101). Planted trees significantly reduced surface erosion For both cuts and fills, erosion volumes per mile of (pp. 13-14); other studies indicated trees should also road length increased as cut or fill height increased reduce mass erosion (pp. 2-3). Trees grew faster in the (pp. 83,101). The study compared erosionwhenthe cut upper fourth ofthe fillslopethaninlower parts (the fill or fill height was the shortest (category 1) to taller length averaged 200 feet). Megahan suggested the heights (categories 2,3, and 4). Height category 1was increased growth might be due to deeper soils and 0 to 10 feet; category2 was 10to 20 feet; category 3 was greater moisture nearer the road (p. 11). 20 to 30 feet; and category 4 was greater than 30 feet for both cuts and fills (pp. 78,96). For fills on all study King 1979, standard, fnE, Horse Creek Study Area, roads, erosion was 6.9 times greater for category 2, Nez Perce National Forest-In the first year after 17.0 times greater for category 3, and 19.5 times greater construction, fill erosion volumes (per 100 feet of road for category 4 (p. 83). On average, for cuts on all study length) increased as fillslope height increased (pp. 5, roads, erosion was 5.5 times greater for ~ategory2~7.5 6). See King (1981) for an analysis of this trend, times greater for category 3, and 10.0times greater for including additional years of data. category 4 (p. 101). A survey of rills and gullies found that the largest For each height category, cut erosion was greater average volumes occurred on fillslopes from 20 to 30 than fill erosion; the difference increased as height feet high(p. 6). However, thelargest gullies, which had increased (p. 106). Percent differences between cut the greatest transport distances, were not related to and £illerosion were 7.0,121.2, and 179.9 for catego- the height of the fill, but to improper drainage from the ries 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The average percent road surface (pp. 6,ll). Transport distances'of mate- difference was 98.4. rial eroded from fillslopes depended more on sideslope See King (1979), Tennyson and others (1981), and characteristics below the fills than on the road stan- Cook and King (1983) for additional information. dard (p. 9). Tennyson and others 1981, cut, fill, Horse Creek See King (1981), Tennyson and others (1981), and Cook and King (1983) for additional information. Study Area, Nez Perce National Forest-For one study road analyzed, erosion volume per mile of road length Megahan and others 1979, standard, cut, fill, increased as both cut and fill heights increased (pp. 13, Clearwater National Forest and Midde Fork of the 15,16,21). See King (1981)for the average increase by Payette River drainage, Boise National Forest-In a height category for all study roads (the figures are survey of mass erosion, 66 percent of road-associated similar in both reports). Aggradation of the ditch slides originated on roadcuts, 27 percent on roadfills increased significantly as cutslope height increased without culverts, and 7 percent on fills with culverts. (pp. 55,701. Forty-seven percent of the volume originated on cuts, See King (1979,1981),and Cook and King (1983)for 31 percent originated on fills without culverts, and 21 additional information. percent originated on fills with culverts. However, Carlton and others 1982, fill, Gospel Hump manage- Burroughs and King 1989, cut, fill, Horse Creek ment areas, Nez Perce National Forest-Fillslope ero- Study Area, Nez Perce National Forest-Sediment sion on newly constructed (1978 and 1979) logging entering the stream from the ditch system (represent- roads was measured in 1980 and 1981, using both ing erosion of the cut, ditch, and 28 percent of the road bordered erosion plots and rill surveys. All fillslopes surface) and that entering from the fillslope side were fertilized, seeded, and hydromulched (p. 13). (representing erosion of the fillslope and 72 percent of The rill survey data, considered more representa- the road surface) was monitored for 4 years after tive of the actual fillslope erosion volumes (pp. 38,45), construction (p. 16). At the study site, the cut and fill were used to develop predictive multiple regression had no erosion control treatment, and the road was equations (p. 32). Fill length and vertical fill height, unsurfaced (p. 15). along with time since construction, were the variables Partitioning of the sediment between the two entry found to be the best predictors of fillslope erosion sites reversed over time. The first year, 20 percent volumes. Slope length andvertical height ofthe fillslope entered from the ditch, and 80 percent from the fillslope were also highly correlated with sediment transport side. By the fourth year, 83 percent entered from the distances (p. 39). ditch, and 17 percent from the fillslope side. This Cook and King 1983, fill, Horse Creek Study Area, reversal was attributed to stabilization over time of Nez Perce National Forest-For 3 years &er road the fillslope due to surface armoring and revegetation construction,eroded material was collected in troughs (p. 16). below windrowed and nonwindrowed fillslopes in two Megahan and Bohn 1989, cut, Silver Creek Study height classes: 0 to 10 feet (class 1)and 10 to 20 feet Area, Boise National Forest-A progressive mass fail- (class 2) (p. 3). All fillslopes had a 1.5:l slope and were ure (sapping failure) originating in a road cutslope seeded, hydromulched, and fertilized (p. 2). Erosion was attributed to cutslope constructionat a gradient of volumes (in cubic feet per 100 feet ofroad length) were 34 degrees. The angle of friction for the soil material greater on class 2 fillslopes for both windrowed and type is about 33 degrees; failures can occur at half the nonwindrowed fills (pp. 3-4): angle of friction when seepage is parallel to the slope Erosion volumes (p. 508). Mass erosion hazards of this type in the Windrowed Nonwindrowed cutslope are increased if timber is harvested above the roadcut (p. 509). (ft3/ 100 ft road length) Ketcheson and Megahan 1990, width, cut, fill, Silver Class 1 0.325 35.85 Class 2 0.650 64.30 Creek Study Area, Boise National Forest-Sediment flows were inventoried from various sources including See King (1979, 1981), and Temyson and others fills, cross drains (relief culverts), berm drains, rock (1981) for additional information. drains, and landings. Sediment flow length and vol- Megahan and others 1983, cut, Silver Creek Study ume increased as the area contributing runoff and Area, Boise National Forest-Long-term (45-year) sediment to each of the sources increased (pp. 4-5). cutslope erosion was positively correlated with origi- Megahan and others 1991, fill, Silver Creek Study nal cutslope gradient (pp. 24,25). The authors recom- Area, Boise National Forest-Sediment from bordered mended constructing cutslopes at lower gradients on fillslope erosion plots was measured for 3 years after gentle terrain and using terraced slopes on steeper road construction (p. 54). Fillslope gradient was not terr'ain (p. 27). a statistically significant predictor of sediment Boise State University, Department of Geology and yield over the range of the data set, 34 to 41 degrees Geophysics 1984, cut, fill, Silver Creek Study Area, (pp. 54-56). Boise National Forest-Sediment collected in troughs See Boise State University, Department of Geology below cutslopes and at the bottom of bordered fillslope andGeophysics(1984) andMegahan andothers (1992) plots was measured for a period of 3 years after road for additional information. construction. Megahan and others 1992, fill, Silver Creek Study No discernible trend was apparent between cutslope Area, Boise National Forest--Sediment from bordered source area above the trough (which depended on fillslope erosion plots was measured for 3 years after cutslope length) and erosion volume (pp. 16,30, 31). road construction. No significant differencein fillslope Cutslope bngths ranged from 10 feet to more than 50 erosion was found between design slopes of feet (p. 7). Cutslope sedimentyieldincreasedascutslope 34 degrees (1.33:1), and 37 degrees (1.5:l). Also, no gradient increased,based on a subsampleof 40 cutslope significant interactions were found between the two plots witha range ingradient of 0.95:l to 1.51:l (p. 18). design slopes and the three fillslope constructionprac- See Megahan and others (1991,1992) for results of tices (sidecast, layer placement, and controlled com- the fill plot data analysis. paction). The results were the same when the actual fillslope gradients, rather than the design gradients, bedn (standard logging road closure techniques that were used. include cross ditching and removal of temporary cul- See Boise State University, Department of Geology verts) (pp. 329-330). Multiple regression analysis and Geophysics (1984), Megahan and others (1991). showed that the "slope obstruction indexn was the See the General Erosion Research Summary. variable most highly related to transport distance, BMP 86-Rule 4.b.i. Plan transportation networks followed by cross ditch interval squared, embankment to minimize road construction within stream protec- slope length, and the product of cross ditch interval tion zones. and road gradient (pp. 330-331). Slope obstructions included in the index were "standing trees, down BMP 87-Rule 4.b.i. Design to leave areas ofvegeta- snags, logging slash, and fallen branches greater than tion between roads and streams (first alternative). 3 inches in diameter, rock outcrops, clumps of brush BMP 88-Rule 4.b.i. Design to reestablish areas higher than 2 feet, tree stumps, hummocks,

Meeuwig, Richard 0. 1971. Soil stability on high-elevation BMPnumbere: 2,3; 8; 100,101,102; 182; 183, GeneralEmsion land in the Intermountain area. Res. Pap. INT-94. Ogden, UT: Research Summary. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, ~~te~~~~eMegahan, Walter F.; King, John G.; Seyedbagheri, Kathleen A. Forest and Range Experiment Station. 10p. 1995. Hydrological and erosional responses of a granitic water- BMP numbers: General Erosion Research Summary. shed to helicopter loggingand broadcast burning. Forest Science. Megahan, Walter F. 1972. Subsurface flowinterception by slogging 41(4): 771-795. road in mountains of central Idaho. In: National symposium on BMP numbers: 2,3; 51; 54; 71. watersheds in transition, Proceedings. American Water ResoUFCes Megahan, Walter F.; Monsen, Stephen B.; Wilson, Monte D. 1991. Association: 350456. Probability of sediment yields from surface erosion on granitic BMP numbers: 85,89,90,91; 143, General Erosion Research roadfills in Idaho. Journal of Environmental Quality. 20(1): 53-60. Summary. BMP numbers: 85,89,90,91; 146, General Erosion Research Megahan, Walter F. 1974a. Deep-rooted plants for erosion control smm. on granitic roadfills in the Idaho Batholith. Res. Pap. INT-161. ~egahan,~dter~- onse sen, Stephen B.; Wilson, MonteD.;Lozano, Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Nicholas; Haber, Donald F.; Booth, Gordon D. 1992. Erosion Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 18 p. control practices applied to granitic roadfills for forest roads in BMP numbers: 85,89,90,91; 117; 121; 122. Idaho: cost effectivenessevaluation. Land Degradation and Re- Megahan, Walter F. 1974b.Erosion over time on severely Titurbed habilitation. 3(1): 55-65. granitic soils: a model. Res. Pap. INT-156. Ogden, UT: U.S. BMPnumbers: 85,89, 90,91; 117; 118; 121; 122; 138. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain For- Megahan, Walter F.; Seyedbagheri,Kathleen A.; Dodson, Patrick C. est and Range Experiment Station. 14 p. 1983. Long-term erosion on granitic roadcuts based on exposed BMPnumbers: 108; 143,166,General WsionResearch Summary. tree roots. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 8: 19-28. Megahan, Walter F. 1978. Erosion processes on steep granitic BMP numbers: 85,89, 90,91; 120; 148; 160; 167. roadfills in central Idaho. Soil Science =ety of America Jour- Megahan, Walter F.; Seyedbagheri, Kathleen k; Mosko, Timothy nal. 42(2): 350-357. L.; Keteheson, Gary L. 1986. Construction phase sediment bud- BMP numbers: 122; 138, General ErosionResearch Summary. get for forest roads on granitic slopes in Idaho. In: Hadley, Megahan, Walter F. 1983. Hydrologic effects of clearcutting and kchard F., ed. Drainage basin sediment delivery: proceedings; wildfire on steep granitic slopes in Idaho. Water Resources Albwueraue.NM: 1986Aumt4-8. IAHSPubl. 159.Wallingford, -. Research. 19(3): 811-819. oxon; UK: lntemational Association for Hydrological Sciences BMP numbers: General Erosion Research Summary. Press: 31-39. Megahan, Walter F, 1987. Increased sedimentation following heli- BMP numbers: 86,87,88; 103; 134; 143. copter loggingand prescribed burning on granitic soil. In: Beschta, Ohlander, Coryell A. 1964. Effects of rehabilitation treatments on Robert L.; Blinn, T.; Grant, GordonE.; Swanson, Frederick J.; Ice, the sediment production of granitic road materials. Fort Collins, George G., eds. Erosion and sedimentation in the Pacific Rim: CO: Colorado State University. 78 p. Thesis. symposium proceedings; Corvallis, OR. 1987 August 3-7. IAHS BMP numbers: 117; 121; 122; 138. Publ. 165. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: International Associa- Packer, Paul E. 1966. Forest treatment effects on water quality. In: tion for Hydrological Sciences Press: 259-260. International symposium on forest hydrology; The Pe~sylvania BMP numbers: 2,3; 71. State University. PA; 1965 Aumst 29September 10: Oxford; Megahan, Walter F. 1988. Effects of forest roads on watershed New Yo& ~erg&on.Press: 685699. hction in mountainous areas. In: Balasubramaniam, A. S.; BMP numbers: 2,3. Chandra, S.; Bergado; Nutalaya, P., eds. Proceedings of tlie Packer, Paul E. 1967. Criteria for designing and locating logging symposium on environmental geotechnica and problematic aoila roads to control mdiment. Forest Science. 13(1): 2-18. and rocks; Bangkok, Thailand; 1985December. Rotterdam: A. k BMPnumbers: 85,89,90,91; 86,87,88; 100,101,102; 128,129; Balkema: 335-348. 166; 167. BMP numbers: 2,3;120; 166; 168; 169; 178; 179. Packer, PaulE.; Christensen, George F. 1964. Guides for controlling Megahan, Walter F. 1991. Erosion and site productivity in western- sediment from secondary logging roads. Ogden, UT; Missoula, montane forest . In:Hamey, AlanE.;Neuenschwander, MT: U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Forest Service, Intermoun- Leon F., comps. Proceedings-management and productivity of tain Forest and Range Experiment Station and Northern Region. western-montane forest soils; Boise, ID; 1990 April 10-12. Gen. 42 p. Reprinted September 1977, U.S. Government Printing Tech. Rep. INT-280. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Office 1980-682-8661222. Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 146-150. BMP numbers: 86,87,88; 100,101,102; 128,129; 166; 167. BMP numbers: 86,87,88. Rurnrner, Robert B. 1982. Analysis of productivity, costs and site Megahan, Walter F.; Bohn, Carolyn C. 1989. Progreeeive, long-term impacts of a second generation mall log skidder. Moscow, ID: slope failure following road construction and logging on Univemity of Idaho. Thesis. noncohesive, granitic eoila of the Idaho Batholith. In: Woessner, BMP numbers: 2,3; 7. William W.; Potts, Donald F., eds. Proceedings of the symposium Snyder, Gordon G. 1973. The effects of clearcutting and burning on on headwaters hydrology. Bethesda, MD: American Water Re- water quality. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho. Thesis. sources Association: 501-610. A more accessible reference based on the same study is: BMP numbers: 85,89,90,91; 148. Snyder, Gordon G.; Haupt, Harold F.; Belt, George H., Jr. Megahan, Walter F.; Day, Norman F.; Bliss, Timothy M. 1979. 1975. Clearcutting and burning slash alter quality of Landslide occurrence in the western and central northern Rocky stream waterin northern Idaho. Res. Pap. INT-168. Ogden, Mountain physiographic province in Idaho. In: Youngberg, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, In- Chester T., ed. Forest soils and land use: Pmeedings, fiRh North termountainForest andRange Experiment Station. 34 p. American forest soils conference; Fort Collins, CO;1978 August. BMP numbers: 71. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University: 116-139. Tennyson, Lany C.; King,John G.; Prud'homme, B. 1981. Erosional BMP numbers: 2, 3; 85, 89, 90, 91; 103; 148; 155, General processes on forest mads and flow duration characteristics of the Erosion Research Summary. Horse Creek streams. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho; College of Megahan, Walter F.; Kidd, Walter J., Jr. 1972a. Effect of logging Forestry, Wildlife, and Range Sciences. 119 p. Cooperative Re- roads on sediment production rates in the Idaho Batholith. Res. search Agreement INT-80-117-CA with U.S. Department of Ag- Pap. INT-123. Ogden, UT:U.S. Department of Agriculture, For- riculture. Forest Service. Intermountain Forest and Range Ex- est Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Sta- periment Station. tion. 14p. BMPnuTnbers:85,89,90,91;86,87,88;103; 117; 12%122; 128, BMPnumbers: 85,89,90,91;86,87,88; 100,101,102; 128,129; 129; 137, General Erosion Research Summary. 143; 182; 183, General Erosion Research Summary. Vincent, Kirk R. 1985. Runoffand erosion from a logging road in Megahan, Walter F.; Kidd, Walter J., Jr. 1972b. Effects of logging response to snowmelt and rainfall. Berkeley, CA: Universrty of and logging roads on erosion and sediment deposition from steep ~aiifornia.60 p. and appendix. Thesis. terrain. Journal of Forestry. 70(3): 136-141. BMPnumbers: 143; 166, General Erosion Research Summary. Seyedbagheri, Kathleen A. 1996. ldaho forestry best management practices: compilation of research on their effectiveness. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-339. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 89 p.

A search was conducted for quantitative ldaho research results on the effectiveness of the ldaho Forest Practices Act rules and regulations pertaining to timber harvest and forest road construction and maintenance. These rules and regulations are designated as the "best management practices" for the prevention of nonpoint source pollution from silvicul- ture under the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act. For each practice, the relevant research results are summarized; more general summaries for related groups of practices are also provided.

Keywords: erosion control, nonpoint pollution, logging, road construction, road mainte- nance, water pollution

You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media. Please specify the publication title and General Technical Report number.

Telephone (801) 625-5437 DG message Pubs:S22A FAX (801) 625-5129, Attn: Publications E-mail /s=pubs/oul [email protected] Mailing Address Publications Distribution lntermountain Research Station 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401

Federal Recycling Program <@ Printed on Recycled Paper INTERMOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION

The lntermountain Research Station provides scientific knowledge and technology to improve manage- ment, protection, and use of the forests and rangelands of the lntermountain West. Research is designed to meet the needs of National Forest managers, Federal and State agencies, industry, academic institutions, public and private organizations, and individuals. Results of research are made available through publica- tions, symposia, workshops, training sessions, and personal contacts. The lntermountain Research Station territory includes Montana, Idaho, Utah, Nevada, and western Wyoming. Eighty-fivepercent of the lands in the Station area, about 231 million acres, are classifiedas forest or rangeland. They include grasslands, deserts, shrublands, alpine areas, and forests. They provide fiber for forest industries, minerals and fossil fuels for energy and industrial development, water for domestic and industrial consumption, forage for livestock and wildlife, and recreation opportunities for millions of visitors. Several Station units conduct research in additional western States, or have missions that are national or international in scope. Station laboratories are located in:

Boise, ldaho

Bozeman, Montana (in cooperation with Montana State University)

Logan, Utah (in cooperation with Utah State University)

Missoula, Montana (in cooperation with the University of Montana)

Moscow, ldaho (in cooperation with the University of Idaho)

Ogden, Utah

Provo, Utah (in cooperation with Brigham Young University)

Reno, Nevada (in cooperation with the University of Nevada)

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA Office of Communications at (202) 720-2791. To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250, or call (202) 720-7327 (voice) or (202) 720-1127 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity employer.