DOCSLIB.ORG

Design of a Honeypot Based Network Defense System To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design of a Honeypot Based Network Defense System To DESIGN OF A HONEYPOT BASED NETWORK DEFENSE SYSTEM TO COUNTERATTACK MALWARES AND BOTNET A FRAMEWORK DESIGN 1Suhel Ahamed 1Assistant Professor Department of Information Technology, Institute of Technology Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalya (Central University)Bilaspur, India Email:[email protected] Abstract— Today the world requires secure David Chess, coined the term in the wild to and trust based computing, wherein describe computer virus that was encountered Malwares (Virus, Worms, Trojans, etc.) and on public network and production systems [4]). intrusions are continues threat to trust based Malware writing also evolved through new computing. Nowadays script kiddies with technologies from simple file infectors or less knowledge are more malicious then the cloner to polymorphic, metamorphic, and retro expert malware writer. They cause the virus. Several malwares Use packing, outbreak of several digital disasters without obfuscation to avoid detection; whereas control. Also the botnet plays important role rootkits, function hooking is used to gain to propagate malwares and support control of the machine and to convert it to Bots. anonymous intrusion. The proposed solution Where polymorphic virus use mutation engine targets these script kiddies by using social to generate a new variant or mutant of the virus engineering on a honey pot based system. to avoid detection; retro type virus and The proposed system counterattacks the malwares use the techniques to destruct the remote machines on botnet by a benevolent computer / network defense system and looking bait to gain control and to break the antivirus programs. propagation chain up to a certain extent. In The malware writers and intruders also use this paper a framework design is presented Social Engineering to gain access and for the proposed solution. propagate through networks. Social engineering is not a technical attack; it does not exploit Keywords— Honeypot; Social Engineering; vulnerability in a program. Instead, it is a Network Defense System; Script kiddies; psychological attack which exploits Botnet; Rootkit; Trojans; Virus; Worms. vulnerabilities of the user. Intruders build up trust of the user, pretending to be a person or I. INTRODUCTION organization the user knows. They then exploit From first large-scale computer virus this trust by obtaining access to the computer outbreak in history to recent threats like heart- and/or passwords of user. These attacks are bleed, Malwares and intrusions proves to be a launched using the same tools the end user uses serious threat to trust based computing. In the every day, such as email, phone, and web [2], past few decades there where several new types e.g. the malwares such as Simpsons.Trojan [8], of malwares found in the wild (IBM researcher and W32.Fujacks [7] uses this technique that ISSN (ONLINE): 2395-6151, VOLUME-1, ISSUE-4, 2015 1 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IJAEPSIT) exploits the sentiments of end user to create a II. HONEYPOT profit chain. Botnets, networks of malware-infected A. Definition machines that are controlled by an adversary, A honeypot is a deception trap, designed to are the root cause of a large number of security entice an attacker into attempting to problems on the Internet. Bot is a type of compromise the information systems in an malware that is written with the intent of taking organisation. If deployed correctly, a honeypot over a large number of hosts on the Internet. can serve as an early-warning and advanced Once infected with a bot, the victim host will security surveillance tool, minimising the risks join a botnet, which is a network of from attacks on IT systems and networks. Honeypots can also analyse the ways in which compromised machines that are under the attackers try to compromise an information control of a malicious entity, typically referred system, providing valuable insight into potential to as the Bot-master. Botnets are the primary system loopholes[3]. means for cyber-criminals to carry out their nefarious tasks, such as sending spam mails, Fred Cohen introduced the first publically launching denial-of-service attacks, or stealing available honeypot solution, the deception personal data such as mail accounts or bank toolkit in 1997[4]. Honey pots can be a credentials. This reflects the shift from an computer or a network of computer, or a service environment in which malware was developed or can be a simple file with some valuable looking data that attracts the attacker to for fun, to the current situation, where malware compromise it. Honeypots are generally is spread for financial profit [1]. classified in to two types, low interaction In the past few years, virus writers have honeypot and high interaction honeypot. A low become more cautious, and craftier. These interaction honeypot generally emulates any days, many elite Malware writers do not spread network service or a simple file; whereas a High their works at all. Instead, they ''publish'' them, interaction honeypot presents itself as a by posting their code on Web sites, often with vulnerable real computer with an operating detailed descriptions of how the program system or a network of computer that may works. Essentially, they leave their virus lying include some real computer and some virtual around for anyone to use. The people who machines. release the virus are often anonymous mischief- makers, or ''script kiddies.'' That's a derived B. Previous Work term for aspiring young hackers, usually Some important honeypots are mentioned teenagers or curious college students, who don't here for the purpose of this paper. yet have the skill to program computers but like Honeyd [9] by Niels Provos it is a small to pretend they do. They download the virus, daemon that creates virtual hosts on a network. claim to have written them themselves and then The hosts can be configured to run arbitrary set them free in an attempt to assume the role of services, and their personality can be adapted so a fearsome digital menace. Script kiddies often that they appear to be running certain operating have only a dim idea of how the code works systems. Honeyd enables a single host to claim and little concern for how a digital plague can multiple addresses. rage out of control [6]. HIHAT [10] The High Interaction Honeypot In this paper a solution is proposed to deal Analysis Toolkit (HIHAT) allows to transform with these problems. A framework design is arbitrary PHP applications into web-based high- presented here for a honeypot based network interaction Honeypots. Furthermore a graphical defense system that uses social engineering user interface is provided which supports the against these script kiddies and tries to gain process of monitoring the Honeypot and control over the botnet machines to break their analyzing the acquired data. chain of propagation up to a certain extent thus preventing the digital disaster at the network LaBrea [11] also called sticky honeypot level and reducing the effect of overall damage.. developed by Tom Liston can capture ARP request on your network, very effectively slowing down worms on a network. LaBrea takes over unused IP addresses, and creates virtual servers that are attractive to worms, hackers, and other denizens of the Internet. The ISSN (ONLINE): 2395-6151, VOLUME-1, ISSUE-4, 2015 2 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IJAEPSIT) program answers connection attempts in such a System. As illustrated in the block diagram way that the machine at the other end gets Fig.1 the honeypot based network defense "stuck", sometimes for a very long time. System has three main components: C. Why Honeypot for this project? A. A new type of Honeypot Honeypots have the capability of attracting Traditional honeypots does not fulfill the the intruders by using Social Engineering requirement of this project as it is only used to against them. For the purpose of this project a record the compromising behavior of the new type of honeypot is required which is intruder or malware, so a new type of Honeypot highly interactive with the remote machines or needs to be conceptualized. bots and which is also capable of enticing the This honeypot is capable of attracting the intruder to self-inject several programs in to the intruders and malwares by the use of veins of Botnet to prevent the propagation social engineering. chain up to a large extent, thus increasing the It should create valuable looking security in trust based computing. resources on real or virtual computers III. FRAMEWORK DESIGN sufficient enough to lure the intruder and The Framework design is presented here for malware to compromise it. the proposed Honeypot based Network Defense Fig. 1. Honeypot Based Network Defense System Counterattacking Botnet chain of Propagation. It should also contain some benevolent B. Integrated pattern analyzer and Signature looking files with Trojan like program extractor (TroLiP) hidden inside it. So when the intruder tries to steal it using a botnet and The honeypot collects necessary copies the file to the nearest bot, it information, traces, Behavioral Patterns and actually takes a Trojan horse home and samples of malwares through attached sensors unknowingly activates it. The Trojan like and monitors; they are then analyzed by the program inside it then opens up some integrated pattern analyzer and Signature unused ports and downloads other extractor. It is based on the concept discussed supporting programs. by Suhel Ahamed et al. [5].As illustrated in It will also use rootkits and function Fig.2. Static signature S(sig) obtained by static hooking methods to gain administrative analysis of suspicious malware samples and control over that bot. after that it will start Dynamic signature D(sig) obtained by dynamic cleaning the bot for its entire malcontents. analysis of patterns, traces and behavioral data of intruder or malware an integrated stronger The Trojan like program will repeat the signature I(sig) can be formulated as: process to all those bots who has copied it, to transfer the valuable looking file to Integrated Signature I(sig) = ∫ ( S(sig) + the master node.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EVALUATION of HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL for MALWARE BEHAVIORAL CLASSIFICATION By
    EVALUATION OF HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL FOR MALWARE BEHAVIORAL CLASSIFICATION By Mohammad Imran A research thesis submitted to the Department of Computer Science, Capital University of Science & Technology, Islamabad in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE CAPITAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ISLAMABAD October 2016 Copyright© 2016 by Mr. Mohammad Imran All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission from the author. To my parents and family Contents List of Figures iv List of Tablesv Abbreviations vi Publications vii Acknowledgements viii Abstractx 1 Introduction1 1.1 What is malware?............................1 1.2 Types of malware............................3 1.2.1 Virus...............................3 1.2.2 Worm..............................3 1.2.3 Trojan horse...........................3 1.2.4 Rootkit.............................4 1.2.5 Spyware.............................4 1.2.6 Adware.............................4 1.2.7 Bot................................4 1.3 Malware attack vectors.........................5 1.3.1 Use of vulnerabilities......................5 1.3.2 Drive-by downloads.......................5 1.3.3 Social engineering........................5 1.4 Combating malware: Malware analysis................5 1.4.1 Static analysis..........................6 1.4.2 Dynamic analysis........................9 1.4.3 Hybrid analysis......................... 12 1.5 Combating malware: Malware detection and classification...... 12 1.6 Observations from the literature.................... 13 1.7 Problem statement........................... 15 1.8 Motivation................................ 15 1.8.1 Why malware analysis?..................... 16 1.8.2 Why Hidden Markov Model?................
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study in DNS Poisoning
    A wrinkle in time: A case study in DNS poisoning Harel Berger Amit Z. Dvir Moti Geva Abstract—The Domain Name System (DNS) provides a trans- lation between readable domain names and IP addresses. The DNS is a key infrastructure component of the Internet and a prime target for a variety of attacks. One of the most significant threat to the DNS’s wellbeing is a DNS poisoning attack, in which the DNS responses are maliciously replaced, or poisoned, by an attacker. To identify this kind of attack, we start by an analysis of different kinds of response times. We present an analysis of typical and atypical response times, while differentiating between the different levels of DNS servers’ response times, from root servers down to internal caching servers. We successfully identify empirical DNS poisoning attacks based on a novel method for DNS response timing analysis. We then present a system we developed to validate our technique that does not require any changes to the DNS protocol or any existing network equipment. Our validation system tested data from different architectures including LAN and cloud environments and real data from an Internet Service Provider (ISP). Our method and system differ from most other DNS poisoning detection methods and achieved high detection rates exceeding 99%. These findings suggest that when used in conjunction with other methods, they can considerably enhance the accuracy of these methods. I. INTRODUCTION Fig. 1. DNS hierarchy example The Domain Name System (DNS) [1], [2] is one of the best known protocols in the Internet. Its main function is to trans- late human-readable domain names into their corresponding following steps.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Advanced Botnets Detection in Various Computing Systems Using Machine Learning Techniques
    SJIF Impact Factor: 7.001| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016 ISSN: 2455-7838(Online) EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD) Volume: 5 | Issue: 12 | December 2020 - Peer Reviewed Journal A STUDY ON ADVANCED BOTNETS DETECTION IN VARIOUS COMPUTING SYSTEMS USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES K. Vamshi Krishna Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Narasaraopet Engineering College, Narasaraopet, Guntur, India Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra5902 ABSTRACT Due to the rapid growth and use of Emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Internet of Things, Information industry became so popular, meanwhile these Emerging technologies have brought lot of impact on human lives and internet network equipment has increased. This increment of internet network equipment may bring some serious security issues. A botnet is a number of Internet-connected devices, each of which is running one or more bots.The main aim of botnet is to infect connected devices and use their resource for automated tasks and generally they remain hidden. Botnets can be used to perform Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks, steal data, send spam, and allow the attacker to access the device and its connection. In this paper we are going to address the advanced Botnet detection techniques using Machine Learning. Traditional botnet detection uses manual analysis and blacklist, and the efficiency is very low. Applying machine learning to batch automatic detection of botnets can greatly improve the efficiency of detection. Using machine learning to detect botnets, we need to collect network traffic and extract traffic characteristics, and then use X-Means, SVM algorithm to detect botnets.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Sisko Final__Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY THE WAKE OF CYBER-WAREFARE STUDENT NAME JACOB SISKO SPRING 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Security and Risk Analysis with honors in Security and Risk Analysis Reviewed and approved* by the following: Gerald Santoro Senior Lecturer Professor Information Sciences and Technology Thesis Supervisor Edward Glantz Senior Lecturer Professor Information Sciences and Technology Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT The purpose of my thesis paper is to explain the significance and inter-relationship of cyber-crime and cyber-warfare. To give my reader a full understanding of the issue, I will begin by explaining the history of the Internet, give a definition of both cyber-crime and cyber-warfare, and then explain how they have impacted the Internet. I will also give examples of a few Chinese hacker groups, and what kind of attacks they have successfully carried out. Then I will talk about how recent attacks have become more sophisticated which are capable of causing more damage. I would also like to discuss how the cyber-warfare has impacted Chinese-US relations, and how it has an impact on the economic ties. Because of the currently capability and potential threat, I will explain why cyber-crime and cyber-warfare are so important to monitor because of the potential damage current and future attacks can cause. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... iii Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 History of the Internet ...................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 Cyber-crime – Functions and Capabilities .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Definition of Bot in Computer Terms
    Definition Of Bot In Computer Terms Crippen.Hearsay BenjieEmil crease Russianising gratifyingly uppishly. as kutcha Kin isHy ironfisted: blue-pencilled she ingenerates her frog wholesale boiling and crazily. wadsets her What bots of bot definition in computer terms chatbot interacts with Refers to a connection between networked computers in below the services of one computer the server are requested by trout other the client Information. The definitions of software that in many users to refer to be used to learn. Is Apex legends Dead 2020? Bot Meaning Best 24 Definitions of Bot YourDictionary. Frequently used in computing definitions of bots designed specifically for words usually protect your neighborhood café and conferencing solutions to. 5 Reasons Why Your Chatbot Needs Natural Language. Evaluating your computer term virus indicates that of computing definitions include in. You letter take pictures with these will send form via the mobile networks to other mobile devices with exactly same technology or to email addresses via the Internet. Using the feed, depending on the game is not contain the impact how web hosting, time by the existing data or valley powers bots? Build and manage Einstein Bots to ease my load on both service agents. This witness the beef of rendered slots googletag. What kinds of repetitive tasks can corn handle? Glossary Archive Malwarebytes Labs Malwarebytes Labs. Contrast to bots in computing definitions above methods that a definition is the tech by coders and access. Often, is kernel type of backdoor that gives an attacker similar remote repair, when the AI is unsure or wants clarification. Problem seems to be cut on network shit on devices.
    [Show full text]
  • An Algorithm for Anomaly-Based Botnet Detection
    An Algorithm for Anomaly-based Botnet Detection James R. Binkley Suresh Singh Computer Science Dept. Computer Science Dept. Portland State University Portland State University Portland, OR, USA Portland, OR, USA [email protected] [email protected] Abstract individual host in the IP channel was a scanner. We then sort the IRC channels by scanning count, with the top We present an anomaly-based algorithm for detecting suspect channels labeled as possible evil channels. This IRC-based botnet meshes. The algorithm combines an algorithm is not signature-based in any way. It does not IRC mesh detection component with a TCP scan detec- rely on ports or known botnet command strings. As a tion heuristic called the TCP work weight. The IRC com- result, we are immune to zero-day problems. Our algo- ponent produces two tuples, one for determining the IRC rithm does assume that IRC is cleartext and that attacks mesh based on IP channel names, and a sub-tuple which are being made with the botnet mesh. collects statistics (including the TCP work weight) on in- dividual IRC hosts in channels. We sort the channels by the number of scanners producing a sorted list of poten- 2 IRC Botnet Detection Algorithm tial botnets. This algorithm has been deployed in PSU’s DMZ for over a year and has proven effective in reducing Our architecture relies on the observation that IRC hosts the number of botnet clients. are grouped into channels by a channel name (for exam- ple, ”F7”, or ”ubuntu” might be channel names), and that an evil channel is an IRC channel with a majority of hosts 1 Introduction performing TCP SYN scanning.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Universidad Carlos Iii De Madrid Signal Processing
    UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID ESCUELA POLITÉCNICA SUPERIOR BACHELOR THESIS SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR MALWARE ANALYSIS Computer Engineering Department AUTHOR: Raquel Tabuyo Benito TUTOR: Pedro Peris Lopez June, 2016 Bachelor Thesis. Signal Processing for Malware Analysis “Perseverance is not a long race. It is many short races one aftr te oter” -Walter Elliot - Page .2 of 134. - Bachelor Thesis. Signal Processing for Malware Analysis Acknowledgements To my whole family, specially my sister, for whom I have an unconditionally love. I am really grateful for their dedication, patience, support and encouragement to follow my dreams. To Pedro, my Bachelor Thesis tutor, whose kindness and guidance have helped me during this wonderful trip. To my friends, thank you very much for showing me the meaning of true friendship. Without all of you, this would have never been possible. - Page .3 of 134. - Bachelor Thesis. Signal Processing for Malware Analysis Abstract This Project is an experimental analysis of Android malware through images. The analysis is based on classifying the malware into families or differentiating between goodware and malware. This analysis has been done considering two approaches. These two approaches have a common starting point, which is the transformation of Android applications into PNG images. After this conversion, the first approach was subtracting each image from the testing set with the images of the training set, in order to establish which unknown malware belongs to a specific family or to distinguish between goodware and malware. Although the accuracy was higher than the one defined in the requirements, this approach was a time consuming task, so we consider another approach to reduce the time and get the same or better accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Supervised Machine Learning Bot Detection Techniques to Identify
    SMU Data Science Review Volume 1 | Number 2 Article 5 2018 Supervised Machine Learning Bot Detection Techniques to Identify Social Twitter Bots Phillip George Efthimion Southern Methodist University, [email protected] Scott aP yne Southern Methodist University, [email protected] Nicholas Proferes University of Kentucky, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/datasciencereview Part of the Theory and Algorithms Commons Recommended Citation Efthimion, hiP llip George; Payne, Scott; and Proferes, Nicholas (2018) "Supervised Machine Learning Bot Detection Techniques to Identify Social Twitter Bots," SMU Data Science Review: Vol. 1 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholar.smu.edu/datasciencereview/vol1/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Data Science Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. Efthimion et al.: Supervised Machine Learning Bot Detection Techniques to Identify Social Twitter Bots Supervised Machine Learning Bot Detection Techniques to Identify Social Twitter Bots Phillip G. Efthimion1, Scott Payne1, Nick Proferes2 1Master of Science in Data Science, Southern Methodist University 6425 Boaz Lane, Dallas, TX 75205 {pefthimion, mspayne}@smu.edu [email protected] Abstract. In this paper, we present novel bot detection algorithms to identify Twitter bot accounts and to determine their prevalence in current online discourse. On social media, bots are ubiquitous. Bot accounts are problematic because they can manipulate information, spread misinformation, and promote unverified information, which can adversely affect public opinion on various topics, such as product sales and political campaigns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Malware Book 2016
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305469492 Handbook of Malware 2016 - A Wikipedia Book Book · July 2016 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.5039.5122 CITATIONS READS 0 13,014 2 authors, including: Reiner Creutzburg Brandenburg University of Applied Sciences 489 PUBLICATIONS 472 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: NDT CE – Assessment of structures || ZfPBau – ZfPStatik View project 14. Nachwuchswissenschaftlerkonferenz Ost- und Mitteldeutscher Fachhochschulen (NWK 14) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Reiner Creutzburg on 20 July 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Handbook of Malware 2016 A Wikipedia Book By Wikipedians Edited by: Reiner Creutzburg Technische Hochschule Brandenburg Fachbereich Informatik und Medien PF 2132 D-14737 Brandenburg Germany Email: [email protected] Contents 1 Malware - Introduction 1 1.1 Malware .................................................. 1 1.1.1 Purposes ............................................. 1 1.1.2 Proliferation ........................................... 2 1.1.3 Infectious malware: viruses and worms ............................. 3 1.1.4 Concealment: Viruses, trojan horses, rootkits, backdoors and evasion .............. 3 1.1.5 Vulnerability to malware ..................................... 4 1.1.6 Anti-malware strategies ..................................... 5 1.1.7 Grayware ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Malware and Fraudulent Electronic Funds Transfers: Who Bears the Loss?
    MALWARE AND FRAUDULENT ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS: WHO BEARS THE LOSS? Robert W. Ludwig, Jr. Salvatore Scanio Joseph S. Szary I. INTRODUCTION After federal banking regulators1 implemented stronger customer authorization controls in the mid-2000s, electronic bank fraud affecting consumers declined significantly.2 By 2009, the criminals adapted, and the rate of electronic bank fraud has been on the rise ever since, with business accounts as the new target.3 According to the FDIC, fraud involving electronic funds transfers4 by businesses resulted in more than 1 The five federal banking agencies: the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Office of Thrift Supervision, comprise the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council [hereinafter FFIEC], which issues regulatory guidelines applicable to the five agencies and their respectively regulated financial institutions. 2 FDIC, Spyware: Guidance on Mitigating Risks from Spyware, FDIC Fin’l Institution Letter 66-2005 (July 22, 2005), with Informational Supplement: Best Practices on Spyware Prevention and Detection; FFIEC, Authentication in an Internet Banking Environment (Oct. 12, 2005); FFIEC, Information Security, IT Examination Handbook (July 2006); FFIEC, Frequently Asked Questions on FFIEC Authentication in an Internet Banking Environment (Aug. 15, 2006). 3 Rob Garver, The Cost of Inaction, U.S. BANKER (July 2010). 4 Hereinafter EFTs. Robert W. Ludwig, Jr. and Salvatore Scanio are partners with Ludwig & Robinson, PLLC, in Washington, D.C. Joseph S. Szary is an Assistant Vice President and Senior Home Office Examiner with Chubb & Son, a division of Federal Insurance Company, in Warren, New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Institute of Criminology Submission
    SUBMISSION NO. 41 House of Representatives Communications Committee Inquiry into Cyber Crime Submission by the Australian Institute of Criminology The Australian Institute of Criminology's cyber crime research In May 2009, the House of Representatives Communications Committee commenced an inquiry into cyber crime and its impact on Australian consumers. The Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the inquiry and wishes to draw the Committee's attention to the following research findings and publications. The AIC first undertook research into cybercrime in 1996 when it received a grant from the Telstra Fund for Social and Policy Research in Telecommunications to examine current and emerging forms of criminality involving telecommunications systems as the instruments and/or the targets of criminal activity; organizational and regulatory shortcomings which facilitate the commission of the illegality in question; difficulties which tend to arise in the detection, investigation, and prosecution of the illegal activity; typical outcomes of the legal process; and countermeasures which will minimise future risk of the illegality in question, without inflicting collateral harm. This research led to the publication of the path-breaking book in Australia, Crime in the Digital Age (Grabosky and Smith 1998) and a series of associated AIC papers and journal articles. Two other works then followed, Electronic Theft (Grabosky, Smith and Dempsey 2001) and Cyber Criminals on Trial (Smith, Grabosky and Urbas 2004) which examined economic crimes perpetrated using computers, and the processes of prosecution, trial and sentencing of cyber criminals, respectively. Institute staff also acted as consultants to the Inquiry into Fraud and Electronic Commerce conducted by the Victorian Parliament, Drugs and Crime Prevention Committee (2004), which was a major review of financial crime involving information and communications technologies.
    [Show full text]