Somerset West and Taunton Council

Home , Bicknoller, Bishops Lydeard, Brompton Ralph, Brompton Regis, Cheddon Fitzpaine, Chipstable

Personal Details:

Name: Karen Mills

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name: District Councillor

Comment text:

I believe that the proposals for the new ward boundaries for the current West Somerset and Taunton area are well thought through and place the appropriate towns and villages appropriately together. And would welcome the confirmation of this new area for Somerset West and Taunton

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded 7/16/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Somerset West and Taunton Council

Personal Details:

Name: Catherine Herbert

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name: Taunton Deane Borough Council

Comment text:

I am one of the current ward members for Killams and Mountfields Ward, that makes up most of your proposed Vivary East. I have a great deal of concern that my area that has been bundled in with a large area of the town centre. When yo7 leave the town and start down South Road there is a feeling of leaving the town as you go over the slight rise and pass Tauntfield (not Tauntfield Close, Tauntfield is past Tauntfield and set back from the road.) Killams and Mountfields has an established residents association, all be it a bit up and down depending on what is going on! It has its own community around our local shops and post office which are all strongly supported, there is a feel of a suburb, a feeling of being outside of town. I am happy that the roads in Trinity area are returning to what was Eastgate ward, there only moved across a few years ago and the area has not managed to build any links across as they look to Eastgate as their community. We have been starting to work with the community in your proposed Vivary West, and we would hope at some point to create a parish council of Vivary that covers our two areas with Vivary being what joins us as much as it sits between us. I would suggest that the town centre would need to have a destinct ward of its own, or be joined with Tangier. There is definately no connection at all between Killams and Mountfields and the town centre and this proposal will not make sense to any residents or make a coherent community in any way.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13625 1/1 Sent: 30 July 2018 11:12 To: reviews Subject: Review Officer (Somerset West and Taunton) Attachments: Review Officer 2.docx

Dear Sir

Please find attached submission for names of new wards in Taunton. If possible can you confirm receipt

Regards

Terry Hall

Review Officer (Somerset West and Taunton) The Deane House Local Government Boundary Commission for England. Taunton Deane BC First Floor Windsor House, 50 Victoria Street, LONDON SW1H OTL

Dear Sir

Boundary Review (Somerset West and Taunton)

I write to represent the Conservative Councillors on Taunton Deane Borough Council. We request that names of four of the new Wards be changed as follows.

Existing there is a single Ward called Manor and Wilton, derived by adding the wards of Manor and Wilton together sometime in the past.

It is planned to split the existing Manor and Wilton Ward across three new Wards.

1 Tangier Ward

As can be seen from the existing ward name, Manor is the name of the Manor Estate and is derived from the Manor House located in Barton Close which is in the centre of the area. This was owned in the middle ages by the Bishop of Winchester. Many roads in the vicinity are named after the Manor House e.g. Manor Orchard, Manor Road, Manor Drive etc.

Tangier is on the edge of the ward and contains the site of the now demolished Gas Works. At present it has no residential dwellings. It is planned to erect riverside apartments amounting to circa 120 on the Gas Works site sometime in the near future.

There are a few commercial properties located in Tangier, but the largest amount of land is given over to Commuter and Shopper parking.

We request that the name of this ward be Manor Ward as this is what the area would be recognised as by local residents.

2 Vivary Ward (West)

This part of the existing ward is called Wilton. The local Parish Church is located towards the centre of the area it has Church Hall which is used for many community activities.

There is a well-used public house called The Vivary Arms

Access can be obtained from Wilton to the highly regarded Vivary Park which has well used bowling and golfing facilities as well as superb horticultural specimens.

Wilton has a thriving community association who have aspirations to become a Parish Council.

Sherford which is adjacent to Wilton, is a mature development of private housing which borders on Countryside.

We request that the new name of this Ward be Wilton & Sherford Ward so the identity of the area is clearly recognisable.

3 Vivary Ward (East)

The currently proposed Vivary Ward (East) comprises a large area from the M5 Motorway to the Taunton Town Centre. Its boundaries encompass roads surrounding Vivary Park and part is coterminous with Vivary (West).

This ward contains the greatest area of Vivary Park.

If our proposal is accepted to change Vivary West to Wilton & Sherford Ward, there will be no longer any need to differentiate between East and West Vivary and Vivary East can become Vivary. It is likely that Vivary will seek to be Parished on its own or with Wilton & Sherford in the future.

We request that the new name of this Ward be Vivary Ward

4 Creechbarrow Ward

This is a new single seat Ward created out of the existing Halcon Ward. The name Creechbarrow derives from the name of a hill in the corner of the Ward. The Ward however covers that part of Taunton known as Halcon.

There is no need or justification for changing the Ward name from Halcon. The elected Councillor will also represent the adjoining Lane Estate.

We request that the new name of this Ward be Halcon & Lane Ward to retain the known identity of the area.

Councillor Terence Hall : Taunton Deane Borough Council

Sent: 21 August 2018 22:29 To: reviews Cc: Subject: Response to Consultation. (West Somerset/Taunton Deane)

Dear Sir/Madam, I am the ward councillor for the Brendon Hill ward. Firstly I would like to say that I fully support your proposal of removing Brompton Regis and Bury and putting them with the Exmoor ward as they naturally turn to the Exmoor National Park for many of their services eg. Planning etc. The rest of my ward (Brompton Ralph, Clatworthy, Huish Champflower, Upton and Skilgate) would then naturally turn to Wiveliscombe for their services which are many. So placing them with Wiveliscombe, Bathealton, Stawley, Chipstable, and Ashbrittle "feels" right. I am not so sure about Fitzhead, I believe their affiliation would lie more towards Taunton than Wiveliscombe, however they are part of the Ten Parishes Festival which I feel is an extremely important tie. The "Wivey Link" a transport service totally run by volunteers, take people from these parishes to doctors/hospital appointments, shopping trips for those that do not have their own transport. Kingsmead School at Wiveliscombe take students from these surrounding parishes. We fully understand that the wards have to get bigger, so what you are proposing seems to be the natural solution. I am also aware that Crowcombe and Stogumber are putting forward another proposal, which was debated at Full Council on Monday (20/8/18). Full Council rejected their Proposal by a very large majority. It would seem that their proposal was based on getting those two parishes back together and cherry picking parishes just to get numbers to stack up. As you will know they placed Brompton Ralph and Clatworthy with the Old Cleeve & District ward. These two parishes have no affiliation to that area at all. As you can see from above, they should be joined with Wiveliscombe. The Brendon Hills and Wiveliscombe are geographically joined, and are extremely closely linked both socially and economically. Therefore I fully support your proposal for the Brendon Hill and Wiveliscombe ward. Yours sincerely, Keith Turner. (Cllr for the Brendon Hill Ward).

West Somerset Council’s Vision: To enable people to live, work and prosper in West Somerset

West Somerset Council values your feedback on the services provided. Please could you take a couple of minutes to provide yours by clicking here and then choose the survey you wish to complete

You can follow us on Facebook and Twitter

The Council is committed to protecting your privacy when you use our services. If you would like more information about how we do so please visit our website at https://www.westsomersetonline.gov.uk/About‐this‐Website/Privacy‐Statement

Please Read: 1. This message is sent in confidence for the addressee only. The content of the email and its attachments are considered proprietary information and should not be disclosed to parties outside of the intended recipient’s organisation. 2. This e‐mail constitutes privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on this information, please delete it from your system and notify the sender and [email protected]. 3. E‐mails to and from the council are monitored in accordance with lawful business practices. 4. The views expressed in this message are personal and must not be considered to be the official views of West Somerset Council. 5. Whilst every reasonable effort has been taken to ensure that this e‐mail message has been swept for

1 the presence of computer viruses the company accepts no responsibility once an e‐mail and any attachments are sent.

This message has been scanned for viruses

2 Sent: 24 August 2018 21:19 To: reviews Subject: Response to consultation (West Somerset/Taunton Deane)

Dear Sir/Madam, I am the Ward Councillor for the Brendon Hill ward. It has now been brought to my attention that there is a proposal to change the name of the "Brendon Hill and Wiveliscombe" ward to the "Wiveliscombe and District" ward. This, I feel, will take away the very nature of the ward. A large part of the new ward area is the Brendon Hills so I feel that it should be reflected in its name. I do hope that you will keep to your original proposal. many thanks, Kind regards, Keith Turner (Ward Councillor for the Brendon Hills)

West Somerset Council’s Vision: To enable people to live, work and prosper in West Somerset

West Somerset Council values your feedback on the services provided. Please could you take a couple of minutes to provide yours by clicking here and then choose the survey you wish to complete

You can follow us on Facebook and Twitter

This message has been scanned for viruses

1 Sent: 24 August 2018 15:16 To: reviews Subject: Fw: Boundary Review Somerset West and Taunton District Council Attachments: Ward2 P list.jpg; Ward2 P maps.jpg

Dear Sir or Madam,

My name is Anthony Trollope‐Bellew. I have lived in Crowcombe all my life. At present I am the leader of West Somerset District Council. I have been the district councillor for the Crowcombe and Stogumber Ward since 2011. I was the Somerset County Councillor for the Watchet & Quantock division, which included Bicknoller Stogumber and Crowcombe from 2001 to 2013.

I voted for the original proposal that was put by West Somerset District Council to the LGBCE because I was told that there was no alternative but to split Crowcombe and Stogumber. I was unable to come up with an alternative solution. Subsequent to this vote the chairman of Crowcombe Parish Council came up with an alternative solution that I believe is far superior. Consequently when the LGBCE proposals came to West Somerset District Council last Monday I proposed an amendment that the recommendation should be changed to that of the Crowcombe proposal. Unfortunately this failed and the proposal to accept the boundary commission proposals was passed with only one, the member for Bicknoller, against and myself abstaining. I believe that including Stogumber in the Old Cleve Ward and thereby splitting it from Crowcombe and Bicknoller is wrong for the following reasons :

1. Education: Crowcombe and Stogumber schools are federated but in fact are integrated all the children from both parishes in reception, years 1 and 2 are taught at Stogumber while all the children from both parishes in years 3,4,5 and 6 at Crowcombe.

2. Religion : Stogumber, Bicknoller and Crowcombe are all in the same Church of England benefice and and so are served by the same rector

3. Transport : Stogumber has no “A” road in the parish so when wishing to travel outside the parish residents join the A358 in either Crowcombe or Bicknoller . Any resident of Stogumber wishing to catch a bus has to use the bus stops in either Bicknoller or Crowcombe parishes. Stogumber Station on the West Somerset Railway is in the parish of Crowcombe. The West Somerset Railway is the only rail connection in the area.

4. All three parishes are in the Doniford Brook flood catchment area.

5. Recreational : there is a crossover of cricket players. There are residents of Stogumber who play for Crowcombe and residents of Crowcombe who play for Stogumber.

Compared with this, to my knowledge, Stogumber has no connections with any of the parishes in the LGBCE proposed Old Cleve Ward.

The proposal, that is attached, was thought out by the chairman of Crowcombe Parish Council joins Stogumber Bicknoller and Crowcombe with Lydeard St Lawrence with Tolland, West Bagborough and 1 Combe Florey. This has the advantage that it is a union of equals. Please note I referred to Lydeard St Lawrence with Tolland as though they are separate parishes they have a joint parish council so for the purposes of this consultation I am treating them as one. The LGBCE proposal puts five of these parishes in a ward that will be dominated by Bishops Lydeard on account of its population size. I have nothing against Bishops Lydeard or the very pleasant people who live there but I do not believe the people of the six parishes wish to be electorally dominated by it. The Crowcombe proposal reunites Bishops Lydeard with Cotford which would put more equally sized villages together. Also until about 10 years ago Cotford for was part of Bishops Lydeard parish so the Crowcombe proposal is logical in putting the old parish back together in one ward.

The Crowcombe proposal has received support from the parish councils of Bicknoller, Stogumber, Lydeard St Lawrence with Tolland, Combe Florey, Bishop Lydeard and Oake. Support from Oake was on the basis that they would rather be with the Nynehead than Cotford. Due to time constraints further consultations have been limited but no written objections to the Crowcombe plan have been received from the effected parishes.

When the divisions for Somerset County Council were reviewed in 2013 Stogumber Bicknoller Crowcombe were put in a totally unnatural division for them of Dunster which stretches to include Alcombe which is in fact a part of Minehead. I contend that the proposed LGBCE ward of South Quantock breaches all natural, geographical and social connections.

Yours Anthony Trollope‐Bellew

The Review Officer (Somerset West and Taunton) l5'.Floor. Windsor House SO.Victoria Street London SWlH OTL

Date: 2l5t.August 2018

Change to ward boundaries for Somerset West and Taunton

Dear Sir, I am a West Monkton parish councillor also an ex- Somerset county councillor I would be grateful if you would take my views into account. These are my personal thoughts and may not be that of West Monkton Parish Council. In general the new warding for the Somerset West and Taunton Council are very good, my problem is with three member wards and particularly that of West Monktonand Cheddon Fitzpaine. This area in partis covered by three ward councillors at present, which works. They are all members of the same political group and the work can be shared out. The electorate has good representation. In the future the members could come from two or even three political groups and with the best will in the world there is littlechance they would work together, let alone share the ward to cover around 2000 of the electorate each. The only losers if this happens will be the electorate and that is not good for democracy. If you look at the West Monkton and Cheddon Fitzpaine ward you will see that the north part of the ward is made up of the two villages of West Monkton and Cheddon Fitzpaine, a small part of east Taunton and the rest rural. The south partis urban with the settlements of MonktonHeathfield and Bath pool plus the new urban development of over 4000 plus homes. Each area is totally different and has differentneeds and problems. I think each area would be best servedas follows and all of the electorate would receive the full coverage they deserve. The electoratenumbers will be with in the 10% range. Members would be fully able to serve their electorate. At the end of the day this is what we aim to achieve. If the suggested ward was to be divided into one.one member ward and one, two member ward with the A 3259 road as the boundary. NORTHWARD: (Possible name: MONKTONand CHEDDON) The one member ward to cover all of the two parishes of West Monkton and Cheddon Fitzpaine northof the A38 from Walford Cross to the A3259 at Monkton Elm and through to the end of Cheddon Fitzpaineparish north of the A3259 at Taunton. This ward would be mainly rural and would include the villages of West Monkton and Cheddon Fitzpaine. This area over the next few years will have a number of new homes added to it at: (1) Crown land on the east of Taunton (2) Eastof Greenway (3) Hartnells Farm

SOUTHWARD: (Possible name: BATH POOL and HEATH FIELD The two member ward to cover all of the two parishes of West Monkton and Cheddon Fitzpaine south of the A38 from Walford Cross to the A3259 at Monkton Elm and on to the end of Cheddon Fitzpaine parish south of the A3259 at Taunton. The ward would cover the urban areas of Monkton Heathfield and Bathpool.

Both new wards would be in the interest of the people and the councillors would be able to servethem more effectively, I am aware that your job is to put together a new warded council in a veryshort time with 59 councillors. Each councillor to represent 1570 electorate as of current numbers and a forecast number of 2070 per councillor. The ward should be like for like so that the interest of the electorate are the same in any part of the ward. Suggesting as you can see this is totally not the case with one 1/3 rural and 2/3 urban. What I am suggesting would balance the area more fairly for all concerned, with- out any change to the number of councillors and the A3259 would be a perfectward boundary.

Cillr Ray.A.Tully West Monkton Parish Council

Enclosed: Boundary maps

Sent: 27 August 2018 10:15 To: reviews Cc: Subject: Attn: Review Officer - Somerset WEst and Taunton

Good Morning

I write to express my concern that you have seen fit to play a straight numbers game and presume to draw your own lines on our map. I know the town wards are under‐represented but they are still within the 10% margin. This reflects the substantial difference in population density between town and country and goes some way to counterbalance and compensate matters.

Having seen the straight numbers game with the SCC re‐organisation where West Monkton has been put with North Curry – the other side of the Levels historically impassable for 6 months of the year. Even now the “New Road” can be closed due to winter flooding. I am not impressed.

To add a further councillor to the centre of Taunton militates against the crying need for a town council for the un‐ parished area with 34K residents. One Chair of Planning would complain that the District councillors for town wards rarely appeared at the planning committee to make informed comments on applications in their wards. A town council might help remedy this. The new council will have a substantially different character and needs from the existing TDBC.

There is in particular with the new flatter administration demanded by technology and cost constraints, a real need to major on the idea of community and how best to develop it. We are moving from a top down to a bottom up world. I would posit that the councils’ proposals tackle this better than yours.

The problem with 3 member wards is that they dissipate responsibility between the three councillors, who are difficult to find for town wards and often come from elsewhere. It is better democratically to break down the areas into smaller units and relate them to their historic origins.

This is exactly what the councils’ proposals endeavoured to do i.e. a separate one councillor ward for that part of Lyngford South of the Priorswood Road. Historically it mainly antedates the Northern part of Lyngford and feels no sense of identity with an area perceived to be dominated by council estates. The councils endeavoured to work on the government principle of location and identity in order to affirm or develop and build up individual communities to enable them to take more responsibility for looking after themselves. People very quickly identify with a particular location ; Halcon (a deprived area) still has proud residents tracing themselves back three generations there. A sense of place is a real problem with all these blanket identikit housing estates. The councils put a tremendous amount of thought into their proposals and you appear not to have fully appreciated the arguments, geography or their local knowledge.

I must admit to some prejudice as I remember an inspector at a former Boundary Commission Review. A number of councillors make very good arguments for one member wards based on history and geography. The Inspector in his summing up remarked on the excellent arguments and then totally ignored them. Did he expect country bumpkins if not morons with nothing but straw between their ears?! I and others, including senior officers noted his remarks.

1 8/29/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Somerset West and Taunton Council

Personal Details:

Name:

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name: minehead town councill

Comment text:

As a minehead town councillor i would ask that you would conciser de warding minehead in line with other town's in west somerset

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/14586 1/1 8/29/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Somerset West and Taunton Council

Personal Details:

Name:

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name:

Comment text:

I am a Town Councillor in Wiveliscombe and one of the two Borough Councillors for the current Wiveliscombe and West Deane ward. The boundaries for the proposed new ward, currently called Brendons and Wiveliscombe, are sensible. It makes sense to have two councillors representing this area as it would not be easy to create single member wards, with the right numbers, to cover Wiveliscombe. The town is a rural centre for surrounding parishes and there are strong links between them, as evidenced by a community newspaper, radio station and area partnership, all of which cover a wider 10 Parishes area. The town also has shops, a secondary school, doctors surgery, swimming pool and more which are used by those living in the town and in nearby parishes. The parishes to be included in the new ward appear the best selection. It would not make sense to extend out much further from Wiveliscombe, as the distances would start to be become too great and the connections too remote. The new name proposed though is not a good fit. Firstly, Wiveliscombe should come first. It is where the largest share of the population for the new ward live and it is the accepted centre for most of the wider area. Brendons, as a name, sits well with some of the other parishes (Brompton Ralph, Clatworthy, Upton etc), but the Brendons covers a far larger area and does not apply to all of the West Deane parishes (Ashbrittle, Bathealton, Stawley). Therefore, a different name would be better if it is to properly apply to the area covered by the new ward. The River Tone provides a connection and Wiveliscombe and Upper Tone would be a good choice, but Upper Tone is already taken as the name for the County Division, so this should not be used. Wiveliscombe and District has been suggested. It fits with names proposed for some other wards, reflects the new ward area and should be acceptable. Another contender, which reflects most of the area well, could be Wiveliscombe and the Hills, but this may still not apply so well to all the West Deane parishes. So, possibly, Wiveliscombe and District is the better, if less lively, choice.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/14621 1/1 8/29/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Somerset West and Taunton Council

Personal Details:

Name:

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name: District Councillor Wiveliscombe & West Deane

Comment text:

I am the current Taunton Deane Councillor for Wiveliscombe and West Deane. I have been a Councillor for this ward for over 10 years and also lived in the area since 1992 and am very aware of the area culturally and economically - having been a Jobcentre Manager for nearly 30 years I am also aware of how people feel about their place and economic needs. I believe that the Brendon’s and Wiveliscombe is the correct building blocks by way of parishes as proposed. However the name should give fuller and better recognition of the Town of Wiveliscombe at it’s rural centre. The ward should be correctly named “Wiveliscombe and District”. I am however sad that the wards of Ashbrittle, Stawley Bathleton Chipstable as well as the newer wards of Skilgate, Upton Huish Chamflower, Clatworthy, Fitzhead, Brompton Ralph etc may feel being quoted in my naming as “District” but when looks at Dulverton, North Curry also with rural hamlets also designated as “and District” so we must live with this. Of course we could use Wiveliscombe and the Hills or Wiveliscombe gateway to Exmoor which also recognises the position and attraction of Wiveliscombe as a tourist destination particularly for walkers - Wiveliscombe being the first town in Somerset to be designated with the nationally recognised “walkers are welcome” destignation.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/14642 1/1 8/29/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal

Somerset West and Taunton Council

Personal Details:

Name:

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name: Taunton Deane Borough Council

Comment text:

I am one of 3 Councillors currently serving in Halcon Ward but recommended by the LGBCE but soon to be reduced to a single Councillor ward and called Creechbarrow. I have made a proposal at "Full Council" of Taunton Deane Borough Council on 23rd of August the ward should be called "HALCON & LANE" instead of Creechbarrow. This was unanimously agreed by the council, including my fellow councillors in Halcon Ward. The second proposal I would like make (this was not brought up at council) regards the proposed boundary of the ward on Ilminster Road. As you will see by the mapping that Hamilton Road on South side of the proposed ward includes both sides of the road (ie. odds & evens), however Ilminster Road only has the left side remaining in the new ward. The right side has been proposed to be in Blackbrook and Holway ward.Surely it makes sense that both sides of the road should in the new ward of Creechbarrow (hopefully to be Halcon & Lane). As it only affects only a maximun of 40 voters (20 houses) it will not affect the % variance very much. This has been confirmed by our Electoral services Manager. It might also be worth noting that the proposed new ward will have a high density (over 70%) of Council/Social/Assisted Living properties. By transferring those properties (on the right side of Ilminster Road) from Blackbrook & Holway over,this would go in some way to changing the "Social Balance" of the new ward, in that Ilminster Road is made up entirely of privately owned. Thank you for giving me this opportunity in making my recommendations known to you.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/14644 1/1 Submission re Boundary Changes to the New to be Created Somerset West and Taunton Council

This submission has been allowed to be provided late by of the Boundary Commission due to having to have had details put onto compact disc for the two Visually Impaired Councillors on the current Taunton Deane Borough Council. They are, Cllr. Sue Lees and Cllr. Dr. Richard Lees.

Number of Councillors: The decision to reduce to 59 Councillors overall in the new Council is disappointing but is understood and accepted by Cllrs. Lees; However, they re pleased that the Commission took the suggestion by the Lib-Dems that there should be 16 Cllrs in the Taunton Town area.

Ward Names: The changes to the Wards meant that new names had to be created and again, Cllrs. Lees are happy with the names as recently submitted by the Taunton Deane Borough council, having made slight alterations and they hope that these will be accepted by the Commission.

Variances in numbers of people in Wards: It has been noted that these vary quite considerably Ward to Ward, and whilst it is difficult to understand why, again, the Lib-Dems suggestions seem to have been taken up and this is pleasing to note. In the Victoria Ward the variances may change if the suggestion below is considered and accepted, but we feel it is within the permitted allowances.

Ward Boundary Changes: As previously suggested in an e mail to the “Whole” of the Tauntfield Close estate in Taunton should be within the newly named Victoria Ward. This is because it has always been part of the old Eastgate Ward, which was a community in itself – having Trinity Primary School within it, and the church of Holy Trinity. Taking out Tauntfield Close estate is fundamentally affecting a community, tnat within its estate it has its own community hall. The properties from the estate that face onto South Road should be within that area too, from 15 South road, to 29 South road.

May we thank the Boundary Commission for allowing this late submission, it is appreciated.

Cllrs Sue and Dr. Richard Lees.