Stalking and Attachment Theory: Causes and Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stalking and Attachment Theory: Causes and Management City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects CUNY Graduate Center 9-2020 Stalking and Attachment Theory: Causes and Management Zoe Turner The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4048 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] STALKING AND ATTACHMENT THEORY: CAUSES AND MANAGEMENT by ZOE TURNER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2020 i © 2020 ZOE TURNER All Rights Reserved ii Stalking and Attachment Theory: Causes and Management by Zoe Turner This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Psychology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________ ____________________________________ Date Phil Yanos, Ph.D. Chair of Examining Committee _______________ ____________________________________ Date Richard Bodner, Ph.D. Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Elizabeth Jeglic, Ph.D. Louis Schlesinger, Ph.D. Philip Erdberg, Ph.D. Ali Khadivi, Ph.D. THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Stalking and Attachment Theory: Causes and Management by Zoe Turner Advisor: Phil Yanos, Ph.D. Stalking is an issue that has drawn increasing attention over the past four decades. Approximately 6 million Americans report being the victims of stalking each year. The psychological and physical effects of stalking can be severe, ranging from anxiety and depression to physical harm and even death. With the rise of technology and social media, cyberstalking has become an additional problem in recent years. It is vital to understand the root causes of stalking behavior from a psychological perspective in order to create appropriate management and treatment plans. The current research investigates the role of attachment theory in stalking. Within the field of psychology, there are several different attachment styles, including secure, insecure avoidant, and insecure ambivalent. The central hypothesis guiding this research is that stalking is closely associated with an insecure attachment style. Data was collected from 3 samples (n = 679) to assess the link between stalking behavior and attachment styles. The results indicated that higher rates of cyberstalking are associated with insecure anxious attachment, but not avoidant attachment. This result was seen across each sample and, as hypothesized, the most common type of cyberstalker was an ex-intimate seeking reconciliation. These insecure attachments are formed during childhood and persist into adulthood, which ultimately have the potential to impact the ability to establish and maintain healthy relationships. Based on these findings, further research is recommended in the areas of attachment and cyberstalking. iv Table of Contents Abstract 3 Chapter 1: Introduction 4 1.1 A Brief History of Stalking 5 1.2 Stalking Laws 6 1.3 Prevalence in the United States 7 1.4 What Constitutes Stalking? 9 1.5 Legal Definitions 11 1.6 Psychological Definitions 13 Chapter 2: Literature Review 15 2.1 Psychological Theories of Stalking 15 2.1.1 Attachment Theory 15 2.1.2 Relational Goal Pursuit Theory 18 2.2 Physiological Factors Associated with Stalking 20 2.3 Stalking Typologies 21 2.3.1 Stalking Typology Related to Psychiatric Diagnosis 21 2.3.2 Stalking Typology and Relationship to Victim 23 2.3.3 Typology for the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry 24 2.3.3.1 The Rejected Stalker 25 2.3.3.2 The Resentful Stalker 25 2.3.3.3 The Stranger Stalker: Intimacy Seekers 25 2.3.3.4 The Incompetent Suitor 26 2.3.3.5 The Predatory Stalker 27 2.4 Ex-Intimate Partner Stalking 28 2.4.1 Violence and Ex-Intimate Partner Stalkers 28 2.5 Management of Stalking 32 2.6 Risk Factors 32 2.6.1 Psychopathology 34 2.6.2 Psychopathy 35 2.7 Assessment of Stalkers 36 2.7.1 Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM) 37 2.7.2 The Stalking Risk Profile (SRP) 38 2.7.3 Self-Report Measures 39 2.8 Perception of Stalking 41 2.8.1 Police Involvement 43 2.8.2 Court Disposition in Stalking Cases 44 2.9 Recidivism and the Stalker 46 2.10 Cyberstalking 46 Chapter 3: Methodology 52 3.1 Research Aims and Hypotheses 52 3.2 Method 54 3.2.1 Participants 54 3.2.2 Procedure 55 3.3.3 Measures 55 Chapter 4: Results 58 Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion 84 References 89 v CHAPTER ONE Introduction Stalking is a significant problem in the United States. The National Crime Victimization Survey estimated that in a single year, 5,857,030 Americans were victims of stalking and harassment (Baum, Catalano, Rand & Rose, 2009). The effects of stalking are also well- documented; over half of the sample cited above changed their behaviors predominantly due to fear. Those who identified as being stalked changed their daily activities (21.6%), stayed with family and friends (18.1%), installed caller ID (18.1%), and changed their locks/got a security system (13.2%). In addition, 6% of stalking victims obtained pepper spray and 2.9% got a gun. 41% of female and 36.8% of male stalking victims reported the stalking behavior to the police. Psychopathology has also been studied in victims of stalking and harassment. Pathé and Mullen (1997) found that heightened anxiety (83%), chronic sleep disturbance (74%), and appetite disturbance (48%) were common among victims. In addition, a further 24% of their sample reported that they attempted suicide or seriously considered it. Other studies have found similar rates (Brewster, 1997; Hall, 1998). The literature shows a clear problem – rates of stalking and harassment are high and the effects on victims is significant. To qualify as stalking, three elements are required to occur in tandem. These elements specify that the stalking behavior needs to be directed at one specific person, that the behavior intends to place that person in fear for his or her safety, and that the behavior places that person in fear for their safety (Owens, 2016). In addition, to be classified as stalking, the behavior must occur more than once. However, most research studies include harassment behaviors in their samples. Consequently, when designing measures researchers typically include both stalking and harassment behaviors in their criteria. 1 Stalkers utilize multiple methods to stalk and harass their victims. These include sending letters or emails, spreading rumors, following, showing up at their home or work, sending gifts, and threatening or even assaulting their victims. In addition, technological advances and social media have given stalkers additional ways to stalk and harass their victims, leading to a rise in cyberstalking. 1.1 A Brief History of Stalking The word “stalk” has a long history. In Old English (circa 1500), the expression meant to walk cautiously or stealthily and was initially intended to describe hunting behaviors (OED, 2017). However, the term stalking, as it relates to today’s understanding, is a relatively new concept that has only been in use in recent decades. For example, in 1975, a rapist described the excitement he experienced while stalking his victims (Footlick, Howard, Camper, Sciolino, & Smith, 1975). Further, in 1985, the serial killer Richard Ramirez was labelled “the night stalker” by Los Angeles newspapers (Kamir, 2001). It was also during this time that our current understanding of stalking as a construct developed. The expression was first mentioned in the literature in 1990 and was used to describe an obsessive harasser (Mullen, Pathe, & Purcell, 2009). However, although the use of the word is relatively new, the behaviors now called stalking have likely been in existence since time immemorial. Stalking first came into the spotlight with the publication of several high-profile stalking cases. One infamous case involved the actress and model Rebecca Schaffer, who was brutally murdered by Robert John Bardo (Gilligan, 1992). Bardo had been stalking Schaffer for three years. On July 18, 1989, Bardo went to Schaffer’s home in California and fatally shot her in the chest. In 1982, Theresa Saldana was also the victim of stalking and a subsequent attack (Markman & LaBrecque, 1994). Arthur Richard Jackson was an obsessed fan from Scotland who 2 illegally entered the USA to stalk and kill Saldana. He believed that when he was executed for her murder, they would be together in the afterlife. Jackson initially hired a private detective to find Saldana’s address. He then waited outside her home and when she came out, he stabbed her ten times. Saldana survived, but her attack, the death of Schaffer, and other similar cases outraged the public, which prompted political action and consequently led to the first anti- stalking laws. 1.2 Stalking Laws California was the first state to adopt anti-stalking laws, which officially criminalized stalking in 1990 via California Penal Code §646.9. The law stated that any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or willfully and maliciously harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking. Other states followed suit. In 1992, thirty states enacted or amended existing laws to address stalking behaviors, and by 1993, an additional nineteen jurisdictions had passed anti-stalking laws (Mullen, Pathe, & Purcell, 2009). Stalking behavior is also addressed via criminal harassment laws. For example, many parts of the Western world, including Canada, enacted criminal harassment laws to specifically address stalking.
Recommended publications
  • What's the Difference Between Harassment and / Or Stalking?
    What’s the difference between Harassment and / or stalking? - The key is to think OBSESSION. Why is it difficult to separate stalking and harassment? • There are similarities in what constitutes harassment and what is stalking. • They are often discussed together and don’t separate. • There is an overlap, and some people may be a victim of both. • A lot of the abuse techniques are the same, but become stalking when used more aggressively, more threateningly and more obsessively. • There is overlap two legal definitions overlap. Definitions Stalking – Stalking is harassment that involves a course of conduct that amounts to stalking, either involving the fear of violence or involving serious alarm or distress. The protection of Freedoms Act 2012 and in the Protection from harassment Act (1997). Stalking victims may like they have their freedom curtailed and feel constantly like they need to be careful. It causes extreme alarm and distress and it is repeated abuse. Harassment - Protection from Harassment Act (1997 section 2) explains that harassment causes harm or distress, putting people in fear in any reasonable person and of fear of violence, repeated attempts of imposed communications. The key differences? Think stalking if the abuse has become an ‘obsession’, if it indicates fixation, is excessively repeated and aggressive in its nature. Data • SafeLives observed that 57% of all high risk cases of domestic abuse had stalking and harassment. Of which, over half said this was at a severe level. Only 14% said that there was no violence. • A Suzy Lampard report suggested 25% of all cases of stalking are reported to the police.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology, Intimate Partner Stalking and Advocacy
    A High-Tech Twist on Abuse: Technology, Intimate Partner Stalking, and Advocacy By Cindy Southworth, Shawndell Dawson, Cynthia Fraser, and Sarah Tucker Safety Net: National Safe & Strategic Technology Project at the National Network to End Domestic Violence Fund authors commissioned by Copyright © 2005 Violence Against Women Online Resources June, 2005 A High-Tech Twist on Abuse: Technology, Intimate Partner Stalking, and Advocacy Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 Research and Scope ....................................................................................................................... 3 The Use of Technology to Stalk ..................................................................................................... 5 Telephone Technologies ........................................................................................................ 5 Location &Surveillance Technologies ................................................................................... 6 Computer &Internet Technology ........................................................................................... 7 Advocacy Response: What Can Advocates Do? ............................................................................ 8 Survivor Advocacy ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stalking Any Individual During the Aggravated Stalking Penalties [MCL 750.411I] • Entering Onto Or Remaining on Property Owned, Leased, Term of Probation
    • Appearing at the victim’s workplace or residence. • Refrain from stalking any individual during the Aggravated stalking penalties [MCL 750.411i] • Entering onto or remaining on property owned, leased, term of probation. Aggravated stalking is a felony punishable for not or occupied by the victim. • Refrain from having any contact with the victim more than 5 years or a fine of not more than A Citizen’s Guide • Contacting the victim by telephone. of the offense. $10,000, or both. • Sending mail or electronic communications (such as • Be evaluated to determine the need for psychiatric, to Michigan’s email or text messaging) to the victim. psychological, or social counseling and if, If the victim was less than 18 years of age at any • Placing an object on, or delivering an object to, determined appropriate by the court, to receive time during the individual’s course of conduct and the Anti-Stalking Laws property owned, leased, or occupied by the victim. psychiatric, psychological, or social counseling individual is 5 or more years older than the victim, by at his or her own expense. imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of Do not minimize the danger of being stalked. Stalkers not more than $15,000, or both. don’t just stop this harassing behavior. Victims should In a prosecution for a violation of this section, evidence seek assistance from advocates, law enforcement and that the defendant continued to engage in a course The court may place an individual convicted of violating the courts to intervene to stop the stalking.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS Klan Plans Teacher's Halli Boston College,] I N B R Ie F ' 5; to Return Remembered Villanova Lose 8.6% Real GNP
    20 - MANCHESTER HERALD. Sat., March 20, 1982 BUSINESS Klan plans Teacher's Halli Boston College,] I n b r ie f ' 5; to return remembered Villanova lose 8.6% Real GNP ... page 4 ... page 9 ... page 13 Hale elected Barter thrives Gross National Product ~ Seasonally adjusted annual CHICAGO — William H. Hale, president of ra te Heritage Savings and Loan Association of Manchester, Conn., has been appointed to the 1982 as mofiey tight Secondary Market Committee of the United States League of Savings Associations. Percentages reflect change The appointment was announced by Roy G. METAIRIE, La. (UPI) — Businesses ’That means members continue to earn from previous quarter Green, chairman of the league and president of and professionals are turning more and their full profit margin under the system Fair tonight Manchester, Conn. Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association, more to bartering in today’s depressed when “selling.” And, when "buying,” and Tuesday Jacksonville, Fla. economy, making a growth industry of the members do not have to spend cash Mon., March 22, 1982 The U.S. League is the principal trade organiza­ the centuries-old system of exchange. that could be used for inventory or — See page 2 tion for the savings and loan business and “The thing is cash flow,’’ said George capital improvements. 1982 Single copy 25<( represents over 4,000 associations throughout the Hesse, director of the New Orleans ’That television dealer who received a country. Trade Exchange. $1,000 debit will receive credits when Savings and loan associations are the second “People have inventory but no cash. If someone in the system comes to him for largest t> pe of financial Institution in America and they can spend $2,(X)0 on buying things a TV set.
    [Show full text]
  • The Efficacy of the California Stalking Law: Surveying Its Evolution, Extracting Insights from Domestic Violence Cases, 6 Hastings Women's L.J
    Hastings Women’s Law Journal Volume 6 Article 13 Number 2 Seeing the Elephant 6-1-1995 The fficE acy of the California Stalking Law: Surveying Its Evolution, Extracting Insights from Domestic Violence Cases Tatia Jorda Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hwlj Recommended Citation Tatia Jorda, The Efficacy of the California Stalking Law: Surveying Its Evolution, Extracting Insights from Domestic Violence Cases, 6 Hastings Women's L.J. 363 (1995). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hwlj/vol6/iss2/13 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Women’s Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Efficacy of the California Stalking Law: Surveying Its Evolution, Extracting Insights from Domestic Violence Cases Tatia Jordan * "The right to be left alone is the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized [people). " -Justice Louis Brandeis I. Introduction In 1990, California became the first state to pass anti-stalking legislation. 1 The rush of other states to quickly pass similar legislation in the succeeding four years is evidence that stalking is becoming an increasingly common crime in our society and has come to the fore of the public conscience. 2 Indeed, since 1990, forty-eight states have enacted anti-stalking statutes. 3 Further, in 1993, United States Senator Barbara Boxer (D-California) co-sponsored a bill to make stalking a federal crime.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON FEELINGS WHEN EXPERIENCING INTIMATE to Be with You Day and Night
    NOTES • What You Can Do: If you want company, don’t hesitate to ask people you trust COMMON FEELINGS WHEN EXPERIENCING INTIMATE to be with you day and night. You may want to make your physical environment PARTNER VIOLENCE & STALKING ________________________________________________________________________ feel safer (for example, moving, making your home more secure and/or getting ________________________________________________________________________ to know your neighbors better). Safety planning is a good way to prepare. If possible, check out the main CARE brochure for some tips and talk you your SHOCK AND NUMBNESS CARE advocate for more information. ________________________________________________________________________ • How You May Feel: Confused, easily overwhelmed, unsure of how to feel or ________________________________________________________________________ VULNERABILITY, DISTRUST what to do, spacey or out of it. • How You May Feel: That you’re at the mercy of your own emotions or the actions ________________________________________________________________________ • What You Can Do: Be aware that these are normal reactions to trauma and of others; unsure of who to trust or how to trust yourself; suspicious and cautious. abuse. Each person handles crisis differently, so think of things that helped ________________________________________________________________________ you get through crises in the past. Get help to sort out what you would like to • What You Can Do: Trust your instincts in regards to who you want to talk with do and how you may want to organize your time, thoughts and decisions. Be ________________________________________________________________________ about what happened to you. Try to talk with people whom you have found to be compassionate toward yourself and give yourself time to heal from past and/or the most dependable in the past, select those who have been good listeners and ongoing abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Being Stalked by an Obsessed Fan Is Every Star's Worst Nightmare. Despite the Best Security Their Money Can Buy. the Results
    BEINGSTALKED BY AN OBSESSED FAN IS EVERY STAR'S WORST NIGHTMARE.DESPITE THE BEST SECURITY THEIR MONEY CAN BUY.THE RESULTS CAN TURN VIOLENT - ANDEVEN DEADLY DAilGERIIUSMI]IDS BTINDOBSESSION (CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT): SHARONGLESS' STALKER JONI LEIGH PENN; REBEC- CASCHAEFFER'S MURDTRER, ROBERT JOHN BARDO; DAVIDLETTERIVIAN FANIVIARGARET RAY;WHITNEY HOUSTON,SSTALKER STEVEN J, MARRIOTT;AND THERESASALDANA'S STALKER ARTHUR JACKSON I(;}.II'EEN-YI.,AR'oI-D DANIELLE IJARRIS TI,IOLI(;H1' SHF]IIAI) IT then came the call from the Los AngclesPolice Departrnent (LAPI)) made. [.ast surnmer,after 1.iyears as a bit player in Holly- proving with all too much certainty that shetruly hacl. wood, including a seasonas the peskyneighbor Molly on Basedon a tip it had receivedfrom the Houston Police Depart- Roseanneand a par:tas Bruce\Willis'daughter inThe Last ment, the LAPD'sthreat-management unit (TMU, an elite force Boy Scout,she learned she was about to land a leadingrole formed in 1990 after the stalkins murder of actressRebecca in a major motion picture - Daylight, starring Sylvester Schaeffer)had every reason to believethat an obsesseclfan was at Stallone,no less- which would be shot on location in Rome. One that very moment on his way to seeHarris. The 19-year-oldsuspect week earlier she'd thrown herselfa big birthday bash at the Studio (policeasked that he not be identified in this story), who'd been City home she sharedwith her manager-mother,Frances, and little sendingHarris threateningletters for three years,was driving from sisterAshley. All her friendswere there,including fellow sitcom Texas with his father and his father's girlfriend.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyberbullying, Cyberstalking, Sexting & the Law
    HUMAN SCIENCES Advancing Bullying Awareness Cyberbullying, Cyberstalking, Sexting & the Law ► In this third of a five-part series, you will learn Alabama’s laws and penalties related to cyber harassment and how they apply to youth. Parents and guardians often think that cyberbullying and sexting only have short-term social and psychological consequences for their children. But cyber harassment, stalking, or forwarding sexually explicit photos to peers can have serious legal consequences for youth and families. The consequences can impact both the victim and the one doing the harrassment. It is important, therefore, for families to be aware of the laws that address cyberbullying, cyberstalking, and sexting. This article will help parents/guardians understand the legal definitions of cyberbullying, cyberstalking, and sexting, along with the Alabama laws that govern those behaviors. Cyberbullying, Cyberstalking, and Sexting Cyberbullying, also referred to legally as cyber someone shared online (home address, license harassment, is defined as using the internet (social plate number, etc.), and technological attacks media, email, etc.), cell phones, or other technology (such as shutting down a person’s social media to send text or images intended to hurt or embarrass account or creating a social media account under the another person. Cyberbullying includes sending hurtful victim’s name). words and images, pretending to be another person online, sending hate mail, stalking, and doing other Cyberbullying and cyberstalking can both be connected harmful behaviors. When people talk about cyberbullying to sexting abuse. Sexting is sharing or forwarding in general, cyberstalking is not often discussed, but it is sexually explicit messages and photos (nude or nearly also a serious issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Stalking Victims
    Kansas Victims’ Bill of Rights Kansas Domestic and Sexual Violence Hotline Numbers 1. Victims should be treated with courtesy, compassion and with respect for their dignity and privacy and Kansas Crisis Hotline should suffer the minimum of necessary inconvenience (888) 363-2287 from their involvement with the criminal justice system. Atchison (800) 367-7075 or (913) 367-0363 Information for 2. Victims should receive, through formal and informal Dodge City (620) 225-6510 procedures, prompt and fair redress for the harm which El Dorado (800) 870-6967 or (316) 321-7104 they have suffered. Emporia (800) 825-1295 or (620) 342-1870 3. Information regarding the availability of criminal Garden City (620) 275-5911 Stalking Victims restitution, recovery of damages in a civil cause of Great Bend (866) 792-1885 or (620) 792-1885 action, the crime victims compensation fund and other Hays (800) 794-4624 or (785) 625-3055 remedies and the mechanisms to obtain such remedies Hutchinson (800) 701-3630 or (620) 663-2522 should be made available to victims. Iola (620) 365-7566 4. Information should be made available to victims about Kansas City, KS their participation in criminal proceedings and the El Centro, Inc. ¡Si Se Puede! (dv) scheduling, progress and ultimate disposition of the (913) 677-0177 proceedings. Friends of Yates / Joyce H. Williams Center (dv) 5. The views and concerns of victims should be (913) 321-0951 ascertained and the appropriate assistance provided Kansas City, MO throughout the criminal process. KCAVP (816) 561-0550 6. When the personal interests of victims are affected, MOCSA (sv) (816) 531-0233 the views or concerns of the victim should, when Lawrence appropriate and consistent with criminal law and GaDuGi Safe Center (sv) (785) 843-8985 procedure, be brought to the attention of the court.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Psychoanalytic Reading of Raging Bull
    29.1 (June 2007): 11–27 ISSN 0210-6124 Masculinity, Violence, Resistance: A New Psychoanalytic Reading of Raging Bull Leighton Grist University of Winchester [email protected] Long regarded as a canonical text of recent Hollywood cinema, Raging Bull has enjoyed not inconsiderable critical attention. The film’s particularized representation of violent masculinity would correspondingly appear to invite psychoanalytic consideration. However, the influential analyses of Pam Cook and Robin Wood excepted, Raging Bull has received little detailed or sustained psychoanalytic examination. Attempting to rectify the situation, this article embeds psychoanalytic discussion within a close formal expounding of the text. In part the article builds upon the work of Cook and Wood, but it also significantly addresses the connotations of the seeming masochism of the film’s protagonist, Jake La Motta (Robert De Niro): a masochism that in discussions of Raging Bull has too often tended to be assumed as axiomatic. Taking a Freudian/Lacanian approach, the article ultimately contends that while Raging Bull can be considered, ideologically, as potentially progressive, the film reaches a conclusion that can be regarded, psychoanalytically, as radical. Keywords: Raging Bull, Martin Scorsese, psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud, Jacques Lacan, masculinity, masochism. In its representation of former world champion middleweight boxer Jake La Motta, Raging Bull (Martin Scorsese, 1980) can be seen to present almost a psychoanalytic case history of violent masculinity. In psychoanalytically based criticism of the film, Jake’s violence has reciprocally been referred to a resistance to perceived threats against that masculinity. Influential have been the arguments propounded by Pam Cook and Robin Wood. Cook reads the film as centred upon “male Oedipal anxieties” (1982: 44), Wood foregrounds its “homosexual subtext” (1986: 109).
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Aid Report Into Online Abuse, Harassment and Stalking
    VIRTUAL WORLD, REAL FEAR Women’s Aid report into online abuse, harassment and stalking www.womensaid.org.uk Report Author CONTENTS Clare Laxton Forewords 3 Polly Neate, Chief Executive, Women’s Aid With thanks to: Caroline Criado-Perez Defi nition of terms 5 Hilary Fisher Siân Hawkins Introduction 6 The links between online abuse and domestic violence 8 The impact of online abuse, harassment and stalking 10 Response of social media providers 13 Response of the police 14 Response of criminal justice agencies 15 Culture of misogyny 16 Support for survivors 18 Conclusion and recommendations 19 Acknowledgments Women’s Aid would like to thank everyone who attended the online stalking, harassment and abuse Production and Design: conference in September 2013 – without your Susannah Marwood contribution this report would not have been Published by: possible. Thank you also to Katie Ross for organising Women’s Aid Federation of England, the conference, the entire Women’s Aid staff for PO Box 391, Bristol, BS99 7WS making it possible and Avon for sponsoring the © Women’s Aid 2014 conference. ISBN 978-0-907817-77-2 Women’s Aid is the national domestic violence charity that supports a network of around 300 local services working to end domestic violence against women and children in England. Our member services are integrated domestic violence service providers delivering a range of holistic services for women experiencing domestic violence and their children. Keeping the voices of survivors at the heart of its work, Women’s Aid campaigns for better support for women and children, provides training and resources for professionals and delivers a package of vital 24 hour lifeline services through publications, websites and the National Domestic Violence Helpline (run in partnership with Refuge).
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Violence, Stalking, and Antistalking Legislation
    NT OF ME J T US U.S. Department of Justice R T A I P C E E D B O J C S Office of Justice Programs F A V M F O I N A C I J S R E BJ G O OJJ DP O F PR National Institute of Justice JUSTICE National Institute of Justice Research Report Domestic Violence, Stalking, and Antistalking Legislation An Annual Report to Congress under the Violence Against Women Act The studies reported here were mandated by Title IV, the Violence Against Women Act, of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. The enabling legislation is: SUBTITLE F—NATIONAL STALKER AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REDUCTION SECTION 40610, REPORT TO CONGRESS, WHICH STATES THE FOLLOWING: The Attorney General shall submit to the Congress an annual report, beginning one year after the date of the enactment of the Act, that provides information concerning the incidence of stalking and domestic violence, and evaluates the effectiveness of antistalking efforts and legislation. Domestic Violence, Stalking, and Antistalking Legislation An Annual Report to Congress under the Violence Against Women Act National Institute of Justice A Publication of the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice April 1996 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Jeremy Travis, J.D. Director This report was edited by Mary Graham, NIJ publications manager, with support from Jolene Hernon, Anne Pritchett, and Patti Schwartz, Cygnus Corporation. The National Institute of Justice acknowl- edges with thanks the contributions of the following reviewers: Office of Policy Development, U.S.
    [Show full text]