Cheatham Lake Master Plan Revision DRAFT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cheatham Lake Master Plan Revision DRAFT Cheatham Lake Master Plan Revision DRAFT For Public Review July 2017 US Army Corps of Engineers Master Plan Revision Nashville District Cheatham Lake For Stakeholder Review, May 2017 2 US Army Corps of Engineers Master Plan Revision Nashville District Cheatham Lake U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cheatham Lake Master Plan Revision Commonly Used Acronyms and Abbreviations AAR – After Action Review EP – Engineering Pamphlet AREC – Agriculture Research and Education EPA – Environmental Protection Agency Center EQ – Environmental Quality ARPA – Archeological Resources Protection ER – Engineering Regulation Act ERDC – Engineering Research & Design Center ASA(CW) – Assistant Secretary of the Army for ESA – Endangered Species Act/ Civil Works Environmentally Sensitive Area ATR - Agency Technical Review FOIA – Freedom of Information Act BMP - Best Management Practice FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact CE-DASLER – Corps of Engineers Data FRM – Flood Risk Management Management & Analysist System for Lakes, FY – Fiscal Year Estuaries, and Rivers GIS - Geographic Information Systems cfs – Cubic Feet per Second GPS – Global Positioning System COL – Colonel GOES – Geostationary Operational CONUS – Continental United States Environmental Satellite COP – Community of Practice H&H – Hydrology and Hydraulics CRM – Cumberland River Mile HABS – Harmful Algal Blooms CW – Civil Works HQUSACE – Headquarters, U. S. Army Corps CWA – Clean Water Act, 1977 of Engineers CWMS – Corps Water Management System IWR – Institute for Water Resources DA – Department of Army LEED – Leadership in Energy and DCP – Data Collection Platform Environmental Design DCW – Director of Civil Works LRN – Nashville District DE – District Engineer/ Division Engineer LTC – Lieutenant Colonel DM – Design Manual MFR – Memorandum for Record DO – Dissolved Oxygen MGD – Millions of Gallons per Day DOD – Department of Defense MOU – Memorandum of Understanding DQC – District Quality Control MP – Master Plan EA – Environmental Assessment MRLC – Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics EAB – Emerald Ash Borer Consortium EC – Engineering Circular MSD – Marine Sanitation Device EDW – Enterprise Data Warehouse MSL/msl – Mean Sea Level (based on the EIS – Environmental Impact Statement National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) EM – Engineering Memorandum MW – Megawatt EO – Executive Order EOPs – Environmental Operating Principles For Stakeholder Review, May 2017 3 US Army Corps of Engineers Master Plan Revision Nashville District Cheatham Lake NAGPRA – Native American Graves and Recreation Plan Repatriation Act SHPO – State Historic Preservation Office NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act SME – Subject Matter Expert NGVD29 – National Geodetic Vertical Datum SMP – Shoreline Management Plan of 1929 SOP – Standard Operating Procedure NHPA – National Historic Preservation Act SOW – Scope of Work NLEB – Northern Long-eared Bat STP – Sewer Treatment Plant NRHP – National Register of Historic Places T&ES – Threatened and Endangered Species NRRS – National Recreation Reservation TBA – To be Announced System TBD – To be Determined NTE – Not to Exceed TDEC – Tennessee Department of NVCS – National Vegetation Classification Environment and Conservation Standard TDNA – Tennessee Department of Natural NWI – National Wetlands Inventory Areas NWS – National Weather Service TDOA – Tennessee Division of Archaeology O&M – Operations and Maintenance TMDL – Total Maximum Daily Load OC – Office of Counsel TSU – Tennessee State University OMBIL – Operations & Maintenance Business TVA – Tennessee Valley Authority Information Link TWRA – Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency OMP – Operational Management Plan UAS – Unmanned Aerial Systems PDT – Project Delivery Team USACE – U. S. Army Corps of Engineers PL – Public Law USC – United States Code PM – Project Manager/Management USFWS – United States Fish and Wildlife PMP – Project Management Plan Service POC – Point of Contact WMA – Wildlife Management Area Project – The lands and waters administered WQ – Water Quality by the Corps of Engineers WRDA/WRRDA– Water Resources Q&A – Question and Answer Development Act QA/QC – Quality Assurance / Quality Control QMP –Quality Management Plan R&D – Research and Development REAL – Recreation Excellence at Army Lakes REAS – Recreation Economics Assessment System REC – Recreation REMIS – Real Estate Management Information System RMC – Risk Management Center SCORP – State Comprehensive Outdoor For Stakeholder Review, May 2017 4 For Stakeholder Review, May 2017 5 US Army Corps of Engineers Master Plan Revision N ashville District Cheatham Lake For Stakeholder Review, M ay 2017 6 US Army Corps of Engineers Master Plan Revision N ashville District Cheatham Lake TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 - Introduction ......................................................................................................... 13 1-1 Project Authorization ........................................................................................................ 13 1-2 Project Purpose ................................................................................................................. 13 1-3 Purpose and Scope of the Master Plan ............................................................................. 14 1-4 Brief Watershed and Project Description .......................................................................... 15 1-5 Brief History of the Project ................................................................................................ 16 1-6 List of Prior Design Manuals (DMs) ................................................................................... 16 1-6 Special Notes about Acreage Calculations ........................................................................ 17 1-7 Listing of Pertinent Project Information ............................................................................ 17 Chapter 2 - Project Setting and Factors Influencing Management and Development ................. 19 2-1 Description of the Reservoir and Navigation Pool ............................................................ 19 2-2 Hydrology .......................................................................................................................... 20 2-02.A Groundwater ..................................................................................................................... 21 2-02.B Surface Water ................................................................................................................... 24 2-03 Sedimentation and Shoreline Erosion ............................................................................... 26 2-04 Water Quality .................................................................................................................... 27 2-05 Climate .............................................................................................................................. 32 2-06 Topography and Physical Geography ................................................................................ 33 2-7 Geology ............................................................................................................................. 34 2-8 Soils ................................................................................................................................... 37 2-08.A Fish and Wildlife Resources ........................................................................................... 42 2-08.B Vegetative Resources .................................................................................................... 44 2-08.C Threatened & Endangered Species ............................................................................... 47 2-08.D Invasive Species ............................................................................................................. 51 2-08.E Ecological Setting ............................................................................................................... 55 2-08.F Wetlands ....................................................................................................................... 57 2-9 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................. 58 2-10 Demographics ................................................................................................................... 59 2-11 Economics ......................................................................................................................... 63 For Stakeholder Review, May 2017 7 US Army Corps of Engineers Master Plan Revision Nashville District Cheatham Lake 2-12 Recreation Facilities, Activities and Needs ........................................................................ 66 2-12.A Zones of Influence ......................................................................................................... 67 2-12.B Visitation Profile ............................................................................................................ 68 2-12.C Recreation Analysis ....................................................................................................... 70 2-12.D Recreational Carrying Capacity ...................................................................................... 71 2-13 Project Access ................................................................................................................... 73 2-14 Real Estate Acquisition Policy ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama
    Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 524-C Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama By JOHN T. HACK SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 524-C Theories of landscape origin are compared using as an example an area of gently dipping rocks that differ in their resistance to erosion UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract___________________________________________ C1 Cumberland Plateau and Highland Rim as a system in Introduction_______________________________________ 1 equilibrium______________________________________ C7 General description of area___________________________ 1 Valleys and coves of the Cumberland Escarpment___ 7 Cumberland Plateau and Highland Rim as dissected and Surficial deposits of the Highland Rim____________ 10 deformed peneplains _____________________ ,... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 Elk River profile_______________________________ 12 Objections to the peneplain theory____________________ 5 Paint Rock Creek profile________________________ 14 Eastern Highland Rim Plateau as a modern peneplain__ 6 Conclusions________________________________________ 14 Equilibrium concept
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING at PRIMM PARK BRENTWOOD, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Technical Report April 2004
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AT PRIMM PARK BRENTWOOD, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Technical Report Kevin E. Smith and Christopher Hogan Report of Archaeological Investigations No. 1 Department of Sociology and Anthropology Middle Tennessee State University April 2004 CONTENTS Contents ii List of Figures iii List of Tables v Acknowledgements vi Management Summary vii I. Introduction 1 II. Prior Archaeological Research 3 III. Current Archaeological Research 13 Excavations Beneath the Floorboards 13 Artifacts from Beneath the Floorboards 15 Yard Excavations Outside the Academy 29 Artifacts from Yard Area Excavations 42 IV. Results and Recommendations 50 References Cited 52 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page 1 Project Location (USGS Franklin 7.5’ quad, 63NE) 2 2 Myer Map of the Fewkes Mound Group (1928) 2 3 Myer profile of Mound 2 4 4 Myer plan view of Mound 2 at first level 4 5 Myer plan view of Mound 2 at second level 5 6 Myer plan view of Mound 5 6 7 Myer plan view of House 6 7 8 Myer plan view of House 17 8 9 DuVall 1996 Shovel Test Locations 9 10 Plan View and Profiles of DuVall 1996 Shovel Tests 13 and 14 10 11 Plan View and Profiles of DuVall 1996 Profile Unit 11 12 Schematic of 2003 Excavations Beneath the Academy 13 13 Excavations in Progress 14 14 Screening Area 14 15 Selected architectural group artifacts 15 16 Histogram of window glass thicknesses 17 17 Slate tablet and pencils 19 18 Other small finds 19 19 Density distribution of prehistoric artifacts beneath the academy 22 20 O’Byam Incised variety Stewart sherd 25 21 Bowl sherds
    [Show full text]
  • East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 Lrrs N and S
    East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 LRRs N and S Brad D. Lee and John M. Kabrick 12.1 Introduction snowfall occurs annually in the Ozark Highlands, the Springfield Plateau, and the St. Francois Knobs and Basins The central, unglaciated US east of the Great Plains to the MLRAs. In the southern half of the region, snowfall is Atlantic coast corresponds to the area covered by LRR N uncommon. (East and Central Farming and Forest Region) and S (Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region). These regions roughly correspond to the Interior Highlands, Interior Plains, 12.2.2 Physiography Appalachian Highlands, and the Northern Coastal Plains. The topography of this region ranges from broad, gently rolling plains to steep mountains. In the northern portion of 12.2 The Interior Highlands this region, much of the Springfield Plateau and the Ozark Highlands is a dissected plateau that includes gently rolling The Interior Highlands occur within the western portion of plains to steeply sloping hills with narrow valleys. Karst LRR N and includes seven MLRAs including the Ozark topography is common and the region has numerous sink- Highlands (116A), the Springfield Plateau (116B), the St. holes, caves, dry stream valleys, and springs. The region also Francois Knobs and Basins (116C), the Boston Mountains includes many scenic spring-fed rivers and streams con- (117), Arkansas Valley and Ridges (118A and 118B), and taining clear, cold water (Fig. 12.2). The elevation ranges the Ouachita Mountains (119). This region comprises from 90 m in the southeastern side of the region and rises to 176,000 km2 in southern Missouri, northern and western over 520 m on the Springfield Plateau in the western portion Arkansas, and eastern Oklahoma (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Archaeology Is Published Semi-Annually in Electronic Print Format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology
    TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Volume 3 Spring 2008 Number 1 EDITORIAL COORDINATORS Michael C. Moore TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Tennessee Division of Archaeology Kevin E. Smith Middle Tennessee State University VOLUME 3 Spring 2008 NUMBER 1 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE David Anderson 1 EDITORS CORNER University of Tennessee ARTICLES Patrick Cummins Alliance for Native American Indian Rights 3 Evidence for Early Mississippian Settlement Aaron Deter-Wolf of the Nashville Basin: Archaeological Division of Archaeology Explorations at the Spencer Site (40DV191) W. STEVEN SPEARS, MICHAEL C. MOORE, AND Jay Franklin KEVIN E. SMITH East Tennessee State University RESEARCH REPORTS Phillip Hodge Department of Transportation 25 A Surface Collection from the Kirk Point Site Zada Law (40HS174), Humphreys County, Tennessee Ashland City, Tennessee CHARLES H. MCNUTT, JOHN B. BROSTER, AND MARK R. NORTON Larry McKee TRC, Inc. 77 Two Mississippian Burial Clusters at Katherine Mickelson Travellers’ Rest, Davidson County, Rhodes College Tennessee DANIEL SUMNER ALLEN IV Sarah Sherwood University of Tennessee 87 Luminescence Dates and Woodland Ceramics from Rock Shelters on the Upper Lynne Sullivan Frank H. McClung Museum Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee JAY D. FRANKLIN Guy Weaver Weaver and Associates LLC Tennessee Archaeology is published semi-annually in electronic print format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology. Correspondence about manuscripts for the journal should be addressed to Michael C. Moore, Tennessee Division of Archaeology, Cole Building #3, 1216 Foster Avenue, Nashville TN 37243. The Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology disclaims responsibility for statements, whether fact or of opinion, made by contributors. On the Cover: Human effigy bowl from Travellers’ Rest, Courtesy, Aaron Deter-Wolf EDITORS CORNER Welcome to the fifth issue of Tennessee Archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Struggle for the Frontier Quiz
    Chapter 2: Struggle for the Frontier Quiz 1. Which of the following tribes lived or hunted in Tennessee? (Select all that apply) a. Cherokee b. Shawnee c. Iroquois d. Creek e. Chickasaw 2. What is Cumberland Gap? a. A low area between the mountains that allowed travelers to cross the mountains more easily b. A trail cut by Richard Henderson through the mountains c. An early settlement in Tennessee d. A mountain peak between Tennessee and Kentucky 3. During the French and Indian War, the British built which Fort in an effort to keep the Cherokee loyal to their side? (Choose 1) a. Fort Nashborough b. Fort Donelson c. Fort Watauga d. Fort Loudoun 4. Choose one answer to complete this sentence: The Proclamation of 1763… a. Ended fighting between the British and the French. b. Prohibited settlements beyond the Appalachian Mountains in an effort to avoid further conflict with Native Americans. c. Was an agreement among the Cherokee about how to deal with the settlers. d. Ended the French and Indian War. Tennessee Blue Book: A History of Tennessee- Student Edition https://tnsoshistory.com 5. Why did the Watauga settlers create the Watauga Compact in 1772? a. Their settlement was under attack by the Cherokee b. Their settlement was outside the boundaries of any colony c. Their settlement was under the control of the British government d. Their settlement needed a more efficient system of government 6. Who cut the trail known as the Wilderness Road? a. James Robertson b. John Donelson c. Daniel Boone d. John Sevier 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Take the Effective June 2016
    2016-2017 Take the EFFECTIVE JUNE 2016 A comprehensive guide to touring Nashville attractions riding MTA buses and the Music City Star. For schedules and other information, visit NashvilleMTA.org or call (615) 862-5950. Nashville MTA & RTA @Nashville_MTA RIDE ALL DAY FOR $5.25 OR LESS Purchase at Music City Central, from the driver, or online at NashvilleMTA.org Take the The Nashville MTA is excited to show you around Music City, whether you’re visiting us for the first time, fifth time, or even if you’re a Middle Tennessee resident enjoying hometown attractions. There’s so much to see and do, and the MTA bus system is an easy, affordable way to see it all. We operate a free downtown service, the Music City Circuit, which is designed to help you reach sports and entertainment venues, downtown hotels, residences, and offices more quickly and easily. The Blue and Green Circuits operate daily with buses traveling to the Bicentennial Mall and the Gulch, a LEED certified community. The Music City Circuit connects many key downtown destinations including the Farmers’ Market, First Tennessee Park, Schermerhorn Symphony Center, Riverfront Station, and the Gulch’s restaurants, bars and condominium towers and numerous points in between. Of course, there are also our other MTA and regional bus routes throughout Middle Tennessee that can be utilized. You can access them by taking a bus to Music City Central, our downtown transit station. Once there, you’ll see how we’re making public transportation more convenient and comfortable, and how making the most of your Nashville experience is now even easier with the MTA.
    [Show full text]
  • Monroe County YMCA 4 Day / 3 Night Nashville TN Adventure – June 14-17, 2016
    Monroe County YMCA 4 day / 3 night Nashville TN Adventure – June 14-17, 2016 Day 1 – Tuesday, June 14, 2016 10:00 a.m. Depart Columbia for Nashville, TN (314 miles). 3:30 p.m. Arrive Nashville. Meet our local representative and check-in: GuestHouse Inn (615) 885-4030 2420 Music Valley Drive 4:45 p.m. Dinner included at the Aquarium Restaurant, located inside Opry Mills. Dive into the Aquarium Restaurant, a spectacular underwater dining adventure where you are seated around a 200,000 gallon centerpiece aquarium with more than 100 species of colorful tropical fish. 7:00 p.m. Experience the Grand Ole Opry – Nashville’s must-see attraction and the world’s longest running live radio show. As the home of country music, the Opry offers an incredible mix of talent to create an American experience like no other! Day 2 – Wednesday, June 15, 2016 6:30 a.m. – 8:00 a.m. Deluxe continental breakfast included at hotel. 8:00 a.m. Depart for Studio B. 8:30 a.m. Enjoy a personally guided tour of historic RCA Studio B, Home of 1,000 Hits, where music legends recorded timeless songs. Stand where Elvis himself stood to record over 200 songs. 10:00 a.m. Admission included to the Country Music Hall of Fame, where you can hear rare recordings of country’s legendary performers, see behind-the-scenes films by today’s stars, along with costumes, instruments and personal treasures from country music’s past and present. 11:30 a.m. Free time on historic 2nd Avenue (downtown) for lunch on own.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a Land Classification System and Its Application to the Management of Tennessee’S State Forests
    DESCRIPTION OF A LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF TENNESSEE’S STATE FORESTS Glendon W. Smalley, S. David Todd, and K. Ward Tarkington III1 Abstract—The Tennessee Division of Forestry has adopted a land classification system developed by the senior author as the basic theme of information for the management of its 15 state forests (162,371 acres) with at least 1 in each of 8 physio- graphic provinces. This paper summarizes the application of the system to six forests on the Cumberland Plateau. Landtypes are the most detailed level in the hierarchical system and represent distinct units of the landscape (mapped at a scale of 1:24,000) as defined by physiography, climate, geology, soils, topography, and vegetation. Each of the 39 landtypes are described in terms of geographic setting, dominant soils, parent material, depth to bedrock, soil texture, soil drainage, relative soil water supply, relative fertility, and forest type. Additional information includes species suitable, site productivity, and operability for management activities. The maps aid the delineation of stands, streamside management zones, and “conservation” and other special use areas; the location of rare, threaten and endangered (RTE) species; the design of harvests; and the modeling of future forest conditions. The landtypes are an integral element in modeling wildlife habitat, in siting game food plots, and planning other wildlife management activities, particularly on forests that are dual wildlife and forest management areas. The maps are excellent training devices and extremely useful in explaining management plans to legislators and the public. INTRODUCTION The five levels of Smalley’s system proceeding from the least- The Tennessee Division of Forestry (TDF) has adopted a land detailed to the most-detailed are: physiographic province, classification system developed by the senior author (Smalley region, subregion, landtype association, and landtype.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cumberland Settlement
    The Cumberland Settlement Essential Question: Why was the Cumberland Settlement created and what problems did the early settlers encounter? In 1775, Richard Henderson purchased 20 million acres of land from the Cherokee in a land deal known as the Transylvania Purchase. The lands lay in what is now middle Tennessee and Kentucky. While Henderson was not able to convince Virginia and North Carolina to recognize his entire claim, he was able to claim the region near the Cumberland River in Middle Tennessee. In 1779, Henderson planned a settlement in order to take advantage of the region’s rich natural resources including fertile soil and abundant animal life. Henderson’s settlement was named the Cumberland Settlement for the Cumberland River which served as main transportation route in the region. Henderson gave the difficult task of establishing the settlement to James Robertson and John Donelson. Donelson was an experienced land surveyor and veteran of the Cherokee War. James Robertson was one of first Watauga settlers and had served as one of the five magistrates established under the Watauga Compact. Robertson had also served as commander of Watuaga Fort during the Cherokee War. Henderson had a two part plan for settling the Cumberland region. First, Robertson and a small group of Wataugans traveled overland in the spring of 1779 to select a site for the settlement near French Lick. French Lick was a natural salt lick along the Cumberland River that had been the location of a French trading post. In December of 1779, Robertson and the men returned and built cabins and Fort Nashborough in preparation for the arrival of Donelson’s party in the spring of 1780.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Markers (Legacy Map) Based on Historical Markers
    Historic Markers (Legacy Map) Based on Historical Markers Numbe Civil War Year Erected Marker Text r Site? 6 1968 Loring's division of Stewart's Corps, Hood's Confederate Army of Tennessee, fought behind this TRUE stone wall Dec. 16, 1864. All Federal attacks were beaten back until the Confederate line was broken a mile to the west. The division retreated south through the hills toward Brentwood. 90 1992 Founded in 1915 as the successor to The Winthrop Model School at the University of Nashville, Peabody Demonstration School was established at this site in 1925 to utilize the teacher training methods developed at George Peabody College for Teachers. It became an independent institution in 1975 and was renamed University School of Nashville. 168 2018 Revolutionary War Pvt. John Alford built a two-room house on this land c. 1810, expanding it in 1812 and 1820. The Alford cemetery retains three markers that were placed as early as 1822. The c.1830 brick two-story Federal dwelling was home to James F. May, grandson of Knoxville founder Gen. James White. May purchased the land in 1837 and resided here until his death. James T. Granbery inherited and restored the house in 1939, and established Seven Springs Farm on the estate. 19 1969 Meharry Medical College, established in 1876 through the efforts of Dr. George W. Hubbard, Dr. William J. Sneed, and Samuel Meharry, is the only AMA Accredited, privately endowed, predominantly Negro medical school in the world. During its first 90 years of service, it trained more Negro physicians and dentists than any other institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose of Plan
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF PLAN Planning is a part of everyone’s life. We make plans for our education, careers, personal goals and housing. Planning is creating strategies to increase the probability of how these things will occur in ways we desire. Without plans, we face never-ending uncertainty about future events. Consequently, we end up reacting to one situation after another. For similar reasons, communities make plans. In large urban areas where the landscape is constantly changing, community plans shape the future in desirable ways. The city is a place where people have many varied needs, a place where citizens live, work, and play. It is, therefore, a place where material goods, police and fire protection, utility infrastructure, transportation, recreation, and many other services must be provided. A Land Use and Transportation Plan is the name given to identify the community’s long- range plan for growth. The comprehensive document provides guidance for all aspects of the city’s growth and development over a long period, typically twenty-years – an entire generation. The plan is an analysis of current trends and analysis of future goals, policies, maps, illustrations, and implementation strategies that state how the city should grow physically and economically. The Land Use and Transportation Plan provides the overall scheme of city development – the major land uses, transportation systems, parks, recreation, and open spaces, and centers of shopping and employment. This plan establishes the framework for all other planning activities and documents. By law, decision-makers such as the Planning Commission, Mayor and Board of Alderman in city government must follow the direction of the Land Use and Transportation Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee Meteorite Impact Sites and Changing Perspectives on Impact Cratering
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND THE TENNESSEE METEORITE IMPACT SITES AND CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT CRATERING A dissertation submitted by Janaruth Harling Ford B.A. Cum Laude (Vanderbilt University), M. Astron. (University of Western Sydney) For the award of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 ABSTRACT Terrestrial impact structures offer astronomers and geologists opportunities to study the impact cratering process. Tennessee has four structures of interest. Information gained over the last century and a half concerning these sites is scattered throughout astronomical, geological and other specialized scientific journals, books, and literature, some of which are elusive. Gathering and compiling this widely- spread information into one historical document benefits the scientific community in general. The Wells Creek Structure is a proven impact site, and has been referred to as the ‘syntype’ cryptoexplosion structure for the United State. It was the first impact structure in the United States in which shatter cones were identified and was probably the subject of the first detailed geological report on a cryptoexplosive structure in the United States. The Wells Creek Structure displays bilateral symmetry, and three smaller ‘craters’ lie to the north of the main Wells Creek structure along its axis of symmetry. The question remains as to whether or not these structures have a common origin with the Wells Creek structure. The Flynn Creek Structure, another proven impact site, was first mentioned as a site of disturbance in Safford’s 1869 report on the geology of Tennessee. It has been noted as the terrestrial feature that bears the closest resemblance to a typical lunar crater, even though it is the probable result of a shallow marine impact.
    [Show full text]