Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama

Copy Link

Recommended publications

When the Mountain Became the Escarpment.FH11

Looking back... with Alun Hughes WHEN THE MOUNTAIN BECAME THE ESCARPMENT The Niagara Escarpment hasnt always been But Coronelli was not the first to put Niagara known by that name. Early in the 19th century it on the map. That distinction belongs to Father Louis was often referred to as the Mountain, and of course Hennepin, the Recollect priest who was the first it is still called that in Hamilton and Grimsby today. European to describe Niagara Falls from personal We in eastern Niagara have largely forgotten the observation. In his Description de la Louisiane, name, though it survives in the City of Thorolds published in 1683, five years after his visit, he speaks motto Where the Ships Climb the Mountain. of le grand Sault de Niagara, and labels it thus on the accompanying map. This is the form that So when did the name Niagara Escarpment first prevails thereafter, and it is the spelling used for Fort come into use? And what about the areas other de Niagara, established by the French at the mouth Niagara names, like Niagara Falls, Niagara River of the river in 1726. The English followed suit, and Niagara Peninsula? When did these first appear? though on many early maps (e.g. Moll 1715, I dont pretend to have definitive answers there Mitchell 1782) they use the name Great Fall of are too many sources I have not seen but I can Niagara rather than Niagara Falls. suggest some preliminary conclusions. In his Description Hennepin also refers to la The name Niagara is definitely of native origin, belle Riviere de Niagara, so the name Niagara though there is no agreement about its meaning.
Chapter 40. Appalachian Planation Surfaces

Chapter 40 Appalachian Planation Surfaces The Appalachian region not only includes the mountains, but also the surrounding provinces. During the erosion episode (see Chapter 8 and Appendix 4), rocks of the Appalachians were sometimes planed into a flat or nearly flat planation surface, especially on the provinces east and west of the Blue Ridge Mountains (Figure 40.1). But planation surfaces are also found in the Appalachian Mountains, mainly on the mountaintops. Figure 40.1. Map of the Appalachian provinces and the two provinces to the west (from Aadland et al., 1992). Due to their rolling and dissected morphology, the Appalachian provinces are rarely called planation surfaces, but they would mostly be erosion surfaces. I will continue to use the more descriptive term, planation surface, with the understanding that many of these are erosion surfaces. The Appalachian provinces exhibit three possible planation surfaces, from east to west, they include: (1) the Piedmont Province, (2) the accordant mountaintops of the Valley and Ridge Province (part of the Appalachian Mountains), and (3) the Appalachian Plateau which is divided into the Allegheny Plateau in the north and the Cumberland Plateau in the south. I also will include the Interior Low Plateaus Province to the west of the Appalachian Plateau. Many articles have been published about the Appalachian planation surface. Their origin is controversial among secular geologists, but they can readily be explained by the runoff of the global Genesis Flood. Figure 40.2. Lake on the Piedmont near Parkersville, South Carolina, showing general flatness of the terrain. The Piedmont Planation Surface The Piedmont Province begins just east of the Blue Ridge Mountains from the Hudson River in the north to Alabama in the south.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING at PRIMM PARK BRENTWOOD, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Technical Report April 2004

ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AT PRIMM PARK BRENTWOOD, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Technical Report Kevin E. Smith and Christopher Hogan Report of Archaeological Investigations No. 1 Department of Sociology and Anthropology Middle Tennessee State University April 2004 CONTENTS Contents ii List of Figures iii List of Tables v Acknowledgements vi Management Summary vii I. Introduction 1 II. Prior Archaeological Research 3 III. Current Archaeological Research 13 Excavations Beneath the Floorboards 13 Artifacts from Beneath the Floorboards 15 Yard Excavations Outside the Academy 29 Artifacts from Yard Area Excavations 42 IV. Results and Recommendations 50 References Cited 52 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page 1 Project Location (USGS Franklin 7.5’ quad, 63NE) 2 2 Myer Map of the Fewkes Mound Group (1928) 2 3 Myer profile of Mound 2 4 4 Myer plan view of Mound 2 at first level 4 5 Myer plan view of Mound 2 at second level 5 6 Myer plan view of Mound 5 6 7 Myer plan view of House 6 7 8 Myer plan view of House 17 8 9 DuVall 1996 Shovel Test Locations 9 10 Plan View and Profiles of DuVall 1996 Shovel Tests 13 and 14 10 11 Plan View and Profiles of DuVall 1996 Profile Unit 11 12 Schematic of 2003 Excavations Beneath the Academy 13 13 Excavations in Progress 14 14 Screening Area 14 15 Selected architectural group artifacts 15 16 Histogram of window glass thicknesses 17 17 Slate tablet and pencils 19 18 Other small finds 19 19 Density distribution of prehistoric artifacts beneath the academy 22 20 O’Byam Incised variety Stewart sherd 25 21 Bowl sherds
General Index

GENERAL INDEX See also separate Stratigraphic Index and Chestnut Ridge anticline, 144 Authors' Index Chimney (Candle Stick) rocks, PIs. LXVII, LXVIII Agawam Station section, 29 Chinn calcite mine, 390 Allegheny-Cumberland structural front, 137 Cincinnati arch, 34, 97,132, 137,155, PIs. II, Allegheny peneplain, 156, 183 VIII, XXXI, XXXIII, XXXVI . Alluvium-filled valleys of western Ken- Claxton Station section (Caldwell Co.), 151 tucky, 161,164,203, PI. LUI Clay, 396, PI. CXVI, (tests and analyses), Barite, 388, 389, PI. XXXIV 404 Barrens (Pennyroyal), 187; (Purchase), 205 Cloverport salt industry, 429 Between the Rivers, 205 Coal, 250. See under mineral resources. Big Black Mountain, 180, PI. XXIV Conglomerate uplift, 355. See Paint Creek Big Bone Lick, 241,425, PI. LXX uplift. Big Bottoms (Purchase), 205 Creek Bottom Settlements (Eastern Coal Big Sandy River, 161, 162, 258, PI. LXXVI Field),175 Blue Grass, 166,167, 170, 231, 237, 389, CreelsboroNatural Bridge, 221, PI. LX 391, PIs. XXXV, XXXVII, Cryptovolcanic structures, 151, 393 XXXVIII, XXXIX, XL, XLIX, LI Cumberland arch, 152 Blue Lick, 245, 429, 431 Cumberland Falls, 238, PI. LXIX Boone's Cave, 231 Cumberland Gap, 143, 216, PIs. XLIII, LIX Bowling Green Is., 409, 412 Cumberland Gap topographic sheet, PI. Breaks of the Sandy, 182, 238, PIs. XLIV, XLIII LXIX Cumberland Mountain, 141,180, PIs. II, Breaks of the Tennessee, 205, 207, PI. II XXXVI, XLIII, LIX, LXIX Brines, 425, 430 "Cumberland Mountains," 175, 180 Brush Creek Hills, 189, 201 Cumberland overthrust (Pine Mountain Building Stone, 408, 409 fault, Cumberland thrust block, etc.), Burdett Knob, 135, 149, 174, 197, 390, 395, 140, 141, 142, 155, 347, PIs.
The Abyssal Giant Pockmarks of the Black Bahama Escarpment: Relations Between Structures, fluids and Carbonate Physiography” by Thibault Cavailhes Et Al

Solid Earth Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-11-RC2, 2020 SED © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Interactive comment Interactive comment on “The abyssal giant pockmarks of the Black Bahama Escarpment: Relations between structures, fluids and carbonate physiography” by Thibault Cavailhes et al. Charles Paull (Referee) [email protected] Received and published: 10 April 2020 The manuscript describes a series of ∼circular depressions at the base of the Bahama Escarpment. These are curious features and their discovery may ultimately merit pub- lication. However, the manuscript more closely resembles a first draft, rather than a Printer-friendly version polished work. As is, the existing draft is too poorly written to fully follow many of the arguments in detail. Part of may be attributed to the challenge of writing in a second Discussion paper language. I have made some suggestions as to how to begin to sharpen the word- ing, but it is an incomplete effort. There are also a number of science related points C1 (also indicate below) that need to be considered before this could be recommended for publication. SED Why are these depressions called pockmarks from the outset? What is actually ob- served are approximately circular depressions. The term ‘pockmark’ has evolved to Interactive imply that the depression was somehow physically excavated by seepage, not phys- comment ical collapse. Moreover, it is not commonly been used in carbonate settings. The manuscript also refers to other similar depressions that have been previously been called plunge pools. This is yet another mechanism for surface erosion.
East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 Lrrs N and S

East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 LRRs N and S Brad D. Lee and John M. Kabrick 12.1 Introduction snowfall occurs annually in the Ozark Highlands, the Springfield Plateau, and the St. Francois Knobs and Basins The central, unglaciated US east of the Great Plains to the MLRAs. In the southern half of the region, snowfall is Atlantic coast corresponds to the area covered by LRR N uncommon. (East and Central Farming and Forest Region) and S (Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region). These regions roughly correspond to the Interior Highlands, Interior Plains, 12.2.2 Physiography Appalachian Highlands, and the Northern Coastal Plains. The topography of this region ranges from broad, gently rolling plains to steep mountains. In the northern portion of 12.2 The Interior Highlands this region, much of the Springfield Plateau and the Ozark Highlands is a dissected plateau that includes gently rolling The Interior Highlands occur within the western portion of plains to steeply sloping hills with narrow valleys. Karst LRR N and includes seven MLRAs including the Ozark topography is common and the region has numerous sink- Highlands (116A), the Springfield Plateau (116B), the St. holes, caves, dry stream valleys, and springs. The region also Francois Knobs and Basins (116C), the Boston Mountains includes many scenic spring-fed rivers and streams con- (117), Arkansas Valley and Ridges (118A and 118B), and taining clear, cold water (Fig. 12.2). The elevation ranges the Ouachita Mountains (119). This region comprises from 90 m in the southeastern side of the region and rises to 176,000 km2 in southern Missouri, northern and western over 520 m on the Springfield Plateau in the western portion Arkansas, and eastern Oklahoma (Fig.
The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee

The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 . II • r ,j • • ~1 =1 i1 .. ·~ II .I '1 .ill ~ I ... ... II 'II .fi :. I !~ ...1 . ~ !,~ .,~ 'I ~ J ·-=· ..I ·~ tJ 1;1 .. II "'"l ,,'\. d • .... ·~ I 3: ... • J ·~ •• I -' -\1 - I =,. The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee By WILLIAM F. OUTERBRIDGE A highly dissected plateau with narrow valleys, steep slopes, narrow crested ridges, and landslides developed on flat-lying Pennsylvanian shales and subgraywacke sandstone during the past 1.5 million years U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Outerbridge, William F. The Logan Plateau, a young physiographic region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1620) Bibliography: p. 18. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1620 1. Geomorphology-Logan Plateau. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1620 557.3 s [551.4'34'0975] 84-600132 [GB566.L6] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Methods of study 3 Geomorphology 4 Stratigraphy 9 Structure 11 Surficial deposits 11 Distribution of residuum 11 Depth of weathering 11 Soils 11 Landslides 11 Derivative maps of the Logan Plateau and surrounding area 12 History of drainage development since late Tertiary time 13 Summary and conclusions 17 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates are in pocket] 1.
1 a Film by Roger J. Kuhns What Was It Like in Door County Wisconsin 425 Million Years Ago? What

a film by Roger J. Kuhns www.rogerjameskuhns.com What was it like in Door County Wisconsin 425 million years ago? What has gone on in the geologic and biologic past beneath our feet? What are the changes we’re experiencing now? What might the future hold for our land, water, environment and communities? “Escarpment” is the natural history story of Eastern Wisconsin and the Niagara Escarpment region of the Great Lakes. The film was shot on location along the entire length of the Niagara Escarpment, with a Door County focus. It is a fast-paced fun voyage through billions of years of Eastern Wisconsin geologic and biologic past. The film reconstructs ecosystems that existed when the dolomitic rocks of the Niagara Escarpment were formed, considers if dinosaurs ever walked in what is now Door County, follows the path of glaciers, and many other major events in our rich geologic past. Locations around the world are featured to show what Eastern Wisconsin was like in the past. Animated sequences are used to illustrate parts of the story. The film helps to inform, enlighten, and guide us towards being better stewards of the land, and takes a glimpse of what a sustainable future might look like. In the spirit of Discovery Channel and National Geographic films, geologist and sustainologist Roger Kuhns produced this film for all ages. Kuhns has worked on the Niagara Escarpment and Great Lakes geology and ecology during the course of his career. FILM: Escarpment GENRE: Science / Nature / Travel PRODUCED BY: Roger J. Kuhns RUN TIME: 1 hour 33 minutes PRODUCTION: musicTOears Press CONTACT INFO: [email protected] / 860-910-8525 AVAILABLE AT: www.rogerjameskuhns.com MOVIE TRAILER: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAyRp7VYFWs 1 2017-2018 Reviews from viewers of a film by Roger J.
Historic Overview

Updated Reconnaissance Level Survey of Historic Resources Town of Amherst HISTORIC OVERVIEW LOCATION The Town of Amherst lies in northern Erie County, New York. It is bordered by Niagara County to the north, the Erie County towns of Clarence to the east, Cheektowaga to the south, and Tonawanda to the west. The total area of Amherst is approximately 53 square miles. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The natural environmental setting influenced prehistoric and historic settlement patterns in the Town of Amherst. The town lies within the Erie‐Ontario Lake Plain physiographic province, described as a nearly level lowland plain with few prominent topographic features. The area is underlain by Onondaga limestone dating to the Late Devonian period. Later glaciations shaped much of the western New York topography, including that of Amherst. One of the most prominent topographic features in the relatively featureless province is the Onondaga Escarpment, an east‐west trending hard limestone bedrock formation that lies in the southern portion of the Town of Amherst. The Onondaga Escarpment proved resistant to the effects of glacial scouring and it forms the southern boundary of a large basin once occupied by the shallow glacial Lake Tonawanda. Lake Tonawanda eventually receded leaving behind wetlands and deposits of clay and sand throughout much of northern Amherst (Owens et al. 1986:2). The most important drainages in the Town of Amherst are Tonawanda Creek, Ransom Creek, and Ellicott Creek. Tonawanda Creek forms the northern boundary between Amherst and Niagara County. It flows in a western direction and drains much of the eastern and Northern portions of Amherst.
Changing Hillslopes : Evolution and Inheritance

Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the Treatise on Geomorphology, the copy attached is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use. This includes without limitation use in instruction at your institution, distribution to specific colleagues, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Roering J.J., and Hales T.C. Changing Hillslopes: Evolution and Inheritance; Inheritance and Evolution of Slopes. In: John F. Shroder (Editor-in-chief), Marston, R.A., and Stoffel, M. (Volume Editors). Treatise on Geomorphology, Vol 7, Mountain and Hillslope Geomorphology, San Diego: Academic Press; 2013. p. 284-305. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy 7.29 Changing Hillslopes: Evolution and Inheritance; Inheritance and Evolution of Slopes JJ Roering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA TC Hales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK r 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 7.29.1 Introduction 285 7.29.2 Hillslope Evolution
Tennessee Archaeology Is Published Semi-Annually in Electronic Print Format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology

TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Volume 3 Spring 2008 Number 1 EDITORIAL COORDINATORS Michael C. Moore TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Tennessee Division of Archaeology Kevin E. Smith Middle Tennessee State University VOLUME 3 Spring 2008 NUMBER 1 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE David Anderson 1 EDITORS CORNER University of Tennessee ARTICLES Patrick Cummins Alliance for Native American Indian Rights 3 Evidence for Early Mississippian Settlement Aaron Deter-Wolf of the Nashville Basin: Archaeological Division of Archaeology Explorations at the Spencer Site (40DV191) W. STEVEN SPEARS, MICHAEL C. MOORE, AND Jay Franklin KEVIN E. SMITH East Tennessee State University RESEARCH REPORTS Phillip Hodge Department of Transportation 25 A Surface Collection from the Kirk Point Site Zada Law (40HS174), Humphreys County, Tennessee Ashland City, Tennessee CHARLES H. MCNUTT, JOHN B. BROSTER, AND MARK R. NORTON Larry McKee TRC, Inc. 77 Two Mississippian Burial Clusters at Katherine Mickelson Travellers’ Rest, Davidson County, Rhodes College Tennessee DANIEL SUMNER ALLEN IV Sarah Sherwood University of Tennessee 87 Luminescence Dates and Woodland Ceramics from Rock Shelters on the Upper Lynne Sullivan Frank H. McClung Museum Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee JAY D. FRANKLIN Guy Weaver Weaver and Associates LLC Tennessee Archaeology is published semi-annually in electronic print format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology. Correspondence about manuscripts for the journal should be addressed to Michael C. Moore, Tennessee Division of Archaeology, Cole Building #3, 1216 Foster Avenue, Nashville TN 37243. The Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology disclaims responsibility for statements, whether fact or of opinion, made by contributors. On the Cover: Human effigy bowl from Travellers’ Rest, Courtesy, Aaron Deter-Wolf EDITORS CORNER Welcome to the fifth issue of Tennessee Archaeology.
Description of a Land Classification System and Its Application to the Management of Tennessee’S State Forests

DESCRIPTION OF A LAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF TENNESSEE’S STATE FORESTS Glendon W. Smalley, S. David Todd, and K. Ward Tarkington III1 Abstract—The Tennessee Division of Forestry has adopted a land classification system developed by the senior author as the basic theme of information for the management of its 15 state forests (162,371 acres) with at least 1 in each of 8 physio- graphic provinces. This paper summarizes the application of the system to six forests on the Cumberland Plateau. Landtypes are the most detailed level in the hierarchical system and represent distinct units of the landscape (mapped at a scale of 1:24,000) as defined by physiography, climate, geology, soils, topography, and vegetation. Each of the 39 landtypes are described in terms of geographic setting, dominant soils, parent material, depth to bedrock, soil texture, soil drainage, relative soil water supply, relative fertility, and forest type. Additional information includes species suitable, site productivity, and operability for management activities. The maps aid the delineation of stands, streamside management zones, and “conservation” and other special use areas; the location of rare, threaten and endangered (RTE) species; the design of harvests; and the modeling of future forest conditions. The landtypes are an integral element in modeling wildlife habitat, in siting game food plots, and planning other wildlife management activities, particularly on forests that are dual wildlife and forest management areas. The maps are excellent training devices and extremely useful in explaining management plans to legislators and the public. INTRODUCTION The five levels of Smalley’s system proceeding from the least- The Tennessee Division of Forestry (TDF) has adopted a land detailed to the most-detailed are: physiographic province, classification system developed by the senior author (Smalley region, subregion, landtype association, and landtype.