2) A/TQ Winter 2003
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Military Assessment of Nuclear Deterrence Requirements Committee
i [H.A.S.C. No. 115–11] MILITARY ASSESSMENT OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCE REQUIREMENTS COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD MARCH 8, 2017 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 24–683 WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS WILLIAM M. ‘‘MAC’’ THORNBERRY, Texas, Chairman WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina ADAM SMITH, Washington JOE WILSON, South Carolina ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey SUSAN A. DAVIS, California ROB BISHOP, Utah JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio RICK LARSEN, Washington MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JIM COOPER, Tennessee TRENT FRANKS, Arizona MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado JOHN GARAMENDI, California ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia JACKIE SPEIER, California DUNCAN HUNTER, California MARC A. VEASEY, Texas MIKE COFFMAN, Colorado TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri BETO O’ROURKE, Texas AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia DONALD NORCROSS, New Jersey MO BROOKS, Alabama RUBEN GALLEGO, Arizona PAUL COOK, California SETH MOULTON, Massachusetts JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii BRAD R. WENSTRUP, Ohio CAROL SHEA–PORTER, New Hampshire BRADLEY BYRNE, Alabama JACKY ROSEN, Nevada SAM GRAVES, Missouri A. DONALD MCEACHIN, Virginia ELISE M. STEFANIK, New York SALUD O. CARBAJAL, California MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland STEPHEN KNIGHT, California STEPHANIE N. -
Nominations of Gen. Paul Selva, TRANSCOM, and VADM Michael S. Rogers, CYBERCOM
S. HRG. 113–611 NOMINATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE, SEC- OND SESSION, 113TH CONGRESS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON NOMINATIONS OF HON. MADELYN R. CREEDON; HON. BRAD R. CARSON; DR. WILLIAM A. LaPLANTE, JR.; HON. ROBERT O. WORK; HON. MICHAEL J. McCORD; MS. CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH; MR. BRIAN P. McKEON; HON. DAVID B. SHEAR; MR. ERIC ROSENBACH; GEN. PAUL J. SELVA, USAF; VADM MI- CHAEL S. ROGERS, USN; DR. LAURA J. JUNOR; MR. GORDON O. TAN- NER; MS. DEBRA S. WADA; MS. MIRANDA A.A. BALLENTINE; DR. MONICA C. REGALBUTO; ADM WILLIAM E. GORTNEY, USN; GEN JOHN F. CAMPBELL, USA; LTG JOSEPH L. VOTEL, USA; GEN. JOSEPH F. DUNFORD, JR., USMC; MR. ROBERT M. SCHER; MS. ELISSA SLOTKIN; MR. DAVID J. BERTEAU; MS. ALISSA M. STARZAK; AND ADM HARRY B. HARRIS, JR., USN JANUARY 16; FEBRUARY 25; MARCH 11; JUNE 19; JULY 10, 17; DECEMBER 2, 2014 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( VerDate Nov 24 2008 15:23 Mar 31, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 Z:\DOCS\93919.TXT JUNE NOMINATIONS OF GEN. PAUL J. SELVA, USAF, FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO THE GRADE OF GENERAL AND TO BE COMMANDER, U.S. TRANSPORTATION COMMAND; AND VADM MICHAEL S. ROGERS, USN, TO BE ADMIRAL AND DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CHIEF, CENTRAL SECURITY SERV- ICES/COMMANDER, U.S. CYBER COMMAND TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014 U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:37 a.m. -
Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The
Each Cadet Squadron is sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below is the listing for the Cadet Squadron and the Sponsor Unit CS SPONSOR WING BASE MAJCOM 1 1st Fighter Wing 1 FW Langley AFB VA ACC 2 388th Fighter Wing 388 FW Hill AFB UT ACC 3 60th Air Mobility Wing 60 AMW Travis AFB CA AMC 4 15th Wing 15 WG Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam PACAF 5 12th Flying Training Wing 12 FTW Randolph AFB TX AETC 6 4th Fighter Wing 4 FW Seymour Johonson AFB NC ACC 7 49th Fighter Wing 49 FW Holloman AFB NM ACC 8 46th Test Wing 46 TW Eglin AFB FL AFMC 9 23rd Wing 23 WG Moody AFB GA ACC 10 56th Fighter Wing 56 FW Luke AFB AZ AETC 11 55th Wing AND 11th Wing 55WG AND 11WG Offutt AFB NE AND Andrews AFB ACC 12 325th Fighter Wing 325 FW Tyndall AFB FL AETC 13 92nd Air Refueling Wing 92 ARW Fairchild AFB WA AMC 14 412th Test Wing 412 TW Edwards AFB CA AFMC 15 355th Fighter Wing 375 AMW Scott AFB IL AMC 16 89th Airlift Wing 89 AW Andrews AFB MD AMC 17 437th Airlift Wing 437 AW Charleston AFB SC AMC 18 314th Airlift Wing 314 AW Little Rock AFB AR AETC 19 19th Airlift Wing 19 AW Little Rock AFB AR AMC 20 20th Fighter Wing 20 FW Shaw AFB SC ACC 21 366th Fighter Wing AND 439 AW 366 FW Mountain Home AFB ID AND Westover ARB ACC/AFRC 22 22nd Air Refueling Wing 22 ARW McConnell AFB KS AMC 23 305th Air Mobility Wing 305 AMW McGuire AFB NJ AMC 24 375th Air Mobility Wing 355 FW Davis-Monthan AFB AZ ACC 25 432nd Wing 432 WG Creech AFB ACC 26 57th Wing 57 WG Nellis AFB NV ACC 27 1st Special Operations Wing 1 SOW Hurlburt Field FL AFSOC 28 96th Air Base Wing AND 434th ARW 96 ABW -
Assessing Unit Readiness: Case Study of an Air Force Mobility Wing
DOCUMENTED BRIEFING R Assessing Unit Readiness Case Study of an Air Force Mobility Wing David E. Thaler, Carl J. Dahlman Project AIR FORCE The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. ISBN: 0-8330-3208-9 The RAND documented briefing series is a mechanism for timely, easy-to-read reporting of research that has been briefed to the client and possibly to other audiences. Although documented briefings have been formally reviewed, they are not expected to be comprehensive or definitive. In many cases, they represent interim work. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2002 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 102, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1516 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] PREFACE In the second half of the 1990s, the United States Air Force began to report a decline in the readiness levels of its combat support forces. -
Historical Brief Installations and Usaaf Combat Units In
HISTORICAL BRIEF INSTALLATIONS AND USAAF COMBAT UNITS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM 1942 - 1945 REVISED AND EXPANDED EDITION OFFICE OF HISTORY HEADQUARTERS THIRD AIR FORCE UNITED STATES AIR FORCES IN EUROPE OCTOBER 1980 REPRINTED: FEBRUARY 1985 FORE~ORD to the 1967 Edition Between June 1942 ~nd Oecemhcr 1945, 165 installations in the United Kingdom were used by combat units of the United States Army Air I"orce~. ;\ tota) of three numbered .,lr forl'es, ninc comllklnds, frJur ;jfr divi'iions, )} w1.l\~H, Illi j(r,IUpl', <lnd 449 squadron!'! were at onE' time or another stationed in ',r'!;rt r.rftaIn. Mnny of tlal~ airrll'lds hnvc been returned to fann land, others havl' houses st.lnding wh~rr:: t'lying Fortr~ss~s and 1.lbcratorR nllce were prepared for their mis.'ilons over the Continent, Only;l few rcm:l.1n ;IS <Jpcr.Jt 11)11., 1 ;'\frfll'ldH. This study has been initl;ltcd by the Third Air Force Historical Division to meet a continuin~ need for accurate information on the location of these bases and the units which they served. During the pas t several years, requests for such information from authors, news media (press and TV), and private individuals has increased. A second study coverin~ t~e bases and units in the United Kingdom from 1948 to the present is programmed. Sources for this compilation included the records on file in the Third Air Force historical archives: Maurer, Maurer, Combat Units of World War II, United States Government Printing Office, 1960 (which also has a brief history of each unit listed); and a British map, "Security Released Airfields 1n the United Kingdom, December 1944" showing the locations of Royal Air Force airfields as of December 1944. -
Statement of Objectives
Statement of Objectives 1) Speed and Location of Service: Obtain non-CAC restricted, Commercial High Speed Internet that will deliver to the following facilities: 60 OG: a) 60th Operations Support Squadron/OSS One Stop, 401 Burgan Blvd, Bldg. 4, Travis AFB, CA 94535 b) 6th Air Refueling Squadron, 585 Hickam Ave, Bldg. 181 (Upstairs), Travis AFB, CA 94535 c) 9th Air Refueling Squadron, 515 Hickam Ave, Bldg. 187, Travis AFB, CA 94535 d) 21st Airlift Squadron, 202 V. St, Bldg. 859, Travis AFB, CA 94535 e) 22nd Airlift Squadron, 170 Ragsdale St, Bldg. 836, Travis AFB, CA 94535 f) 60th Operations Group, 611 E. St, Bldg. 50, Travis AFB, CA 94535 g) KC-10 Formal Training Unit, 750 E. St, Bldg. 1212, Travis AFB, CA 94535 h) 60 Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron 561 Waldron St, Bldg. 241, Travis AFB, CA 94535. • Phoenix Spark is co-located with 60 Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron in building 241. Until further notice, connection for 60 AMW Phoenix Spark and 60 Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron is to be combined into one. 60 AMW WSA: i) 60 AMW Phoenix Spark 581 Waldron St, Bldg. 241, H-Bay Travis AFB, CA 94535. • Phoenix Spark is co-located with 60 Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron in building 241. Until further notice, connection for 60 AMW Phoenix Spark and 60 Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron is to be combined into one. Both: AC Dual-Band Wi-Fi in both the 2.4 Ghz & 5 Ghz ranges with no less than: a) 200 Mbps download speed shared between all access points with the ability to increase to 500 Mbps as needed without further installation fees b) 20 Mbps upload speed c) Must be able to download 13-23 Gb within 30 minutes For up to 30 users at one time, per facility, to support AMC’s vision of MAF crews operating at remote locations across the globe. -
US Army Air Force 50Th-99Th Squadrons 1941-1945
US Army Air Force 50th-99th Squadrons 1941-1945 Note: Only overseas stations are listed. All US stations are summarized as continental US. 50th Bombardment Squadron: Constituted as 50th Bombardment Squadron (Light) on 11/20/40, activated 1/15/41, disbanded 5/1/44. Anti-submarine operations from the Continental US only. 1941-4 A-20 50th Fighter Squadron: Constituted on 11/20/40 as 50th Pursuit Squadron (Fighter), activated 1/15/41, redesignated 50th Fighter squadron on 5/15/42, disbanded 8/9/44. 1942 Continental US 8/18/42 Atcham, England (operated in Iceland 18 Aug-14 Nov 42) 11/14/42 Iceland 2/44 Nuthampsted, Engla nd 3/15/44 Cheddington, England 4/12/44 Watton, England 1941 P-40 1942 P-40, P-38 1943-5 P-38 50th Troop Carrier Squadron: Constituted on 5/3/42 as 50th Transport Squadron, activated 6 /15/42, redesignated 50th Troop Carrier Squadron on 7 /4/42, inactivated 5/27/46. 42-43 Continental US 5/21/43 Berguent, French Morocco 6/26/43 Kairouan, Tunisia 9/2/43 Castelvetrano, Sicily 3/6/44 Saltby, England 3/5/45 Poix, France 1942-5 C-47 51st Bombardment Squadron: Constituted on 11/20/40 as the 51st Bombardment Squadron (Light), activated 1/15/41, disbanded 5/1/44. Anti-submarine operations continental US only. Continental US only 1941-3 A-20 1944 A-20, B-25 51st Fighter Squadron: Constituted on 11/22/40 as the 51st Pursuit Squadron (Fighter), activated 1/1/41, redesignated 51st Fighter Squadron on 5/15/42, inactivate d 10/15/46. -
USAF MAJOR INSTALLATIONS BASE FACT SHEETS G.:F..He B*",*-..'T," DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE and REALIGNMENTCOMMISSIOP~ 1700 NORTH MOORE STREET SUITE 1425 2
DCN 1117 USAF MAJOR INSTALLATIONS BASE FACT SHEETS g.:F..he b*",*-..'t," DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENTCOMMISSIOP~ 1700 NORTH MOORE STREET SUITE 1425 2 . 5 -'.. *.s ARLINGTON. VA 22209 +w-' lwy& 703-696-0504 &-L ", -e ',;, e n!er to this when wr~ty~~r~d%Qa_tctt\ February 13, 1995 ,----- Headquarters USAF/RT 1670 Air Force Pentagon Washington D.C. 20330-1670 Dear General Blume: To enhance the background knowledge of the Air Force Team members on the current Air Force hfhmwture, we request Base Fact Sheets on individual major installations located within the US.be fo'mded to the commission at your earliest convenience. These fact sheets are a standard product prepared by the Air Force's Bases and Units Division of the Directorate of Operations and are used by Air Force leaders and congressional representatives for information purposes. The fact sheets contain only current information pertaining to the bases, i.e., location, major units assigned, manpower authorizations, congressionally announced ehanges, and the most i cumnt MILCON programs as approved or submitted to Congress. The information will stbe 1 used as m@ed data in the analysis of the DOD closure and realignment recommendations to be ....... on March 1, 1995. \ Thank you for your support in this request. SZ&. F cis A. ~rillo. Air Force Team ~eader FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY USAF BASE FACT SHEET w ALTUS AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA MAJCOM/LOCATION/SIZE: AETC base in Altus with 3,878 acres MAJOR UNITSIFORCE STRUCTURE: 97th Air Mobility Wing -- Provides formal airlift and tanker training -- 6 C-5A, 12 C-141B, and 24 KC-135R USAF MANPOWER AUTHORIZATIONS: (As of FY 9512) MILITARY--Am CIVILIAN TOTAL ANNOUNCED ACTIONS: The 97th Air Mobility Wing will lose 1 C-141B aircraft in midl-1995. -
A Comparison of In-Flight Refueling Methods for Fighter Aircraft: Boom-Receptacle Vs
A Comparison of In-flight Refueling Methods for Fighter Aircraft: Boom-receptacle vs. Probe-and-drogue Brian J. Theiss Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University ABSTRACT Aerial refueling dates back to the very beginnings of flight and has developed into two very different and incompatible methods. While the U.S. Air Force primarily uses a boom-receptacle method, the U.S. Navy uses a probe-and-drogue method. Cross-service commonality of aerial refueling methods is a concept that has the potential to save money and increase the tactical abilities of the armed services. This paper serves to examine the feasibility of using a common method of aerial refueling for fighter/attack aircraft (collectively referred to as fighter aircraft). Safety, reliability, weight and refuel rates have been examined for each method. Currently there can be no set standard for fighter aircraft. The requirements for the U.S. Navy are such that they would not be able to utilize boom-receptacle refueling adequately, and similarly the requirements for the U.S. Air Force are such that probe-and-drogue refueling would not be feasible. There are many variables to consider with each aircraft and its intended use that affect which method is best incorporated. INTRODUCTION once the adapter is attached, the tanker can only refuel probe-equipped aircraft (Byrd, 1994). Currently, there are two different and The BDA kit also has a greater tendency to snap incompatible methods for aerial refueling. The off at the probe (Gebicke, 1993a). The Navy first method is a probe-and-drogue method used requires two drogues in the air for redundancy by the United States Navy, Marine Corps, and and that translates to two KC-135s with adapter limited United States Air Force aircraft. -
Travis Air Force Base : California
Military Asset List 2016 U.S. Air Force TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE : CALIFORNIA Travis Air Force Base (AFB) is located in the San Francisco Bay area, in Fairfield, California, approximately halfway between Sacramento and San Francisco. Its host unit is the 60th Air Mobility Wing, which is the largest air mobility organization in the U.S. Air Force. In addition, it is home to the 349th Air Above: Travis AFB gate sign prominently Mobility Wing, which displays the 60th Air Mobility Wing’s is the largest air motto – “America’s First Choice.” reserve wing in the Left: September 11, 2013 Travis AFB U.S. Air Force, and executed a mass aircraft launch exercise. The launch of eleven KC-10A the West Coast Extenders, seven C-17 Globemaster IIIs, branch of the 621st and four C-5 Galaxies provided essential training across the spectrum of mobility Contingency capabilities, including flight operations, operations support, aircraft Response Wing, maintenance, fuels and air traffic control. Travis AFB is the only U.S. Air which is America’s 9-1-1 force. As such, Travis AFB handles more Force base to house all of these cargo and passengers than any other military air terminal in the aircrafts. (U.S. Air Force photo) United States. As the largest employer in Solano County, Travis AFB 60th AMW MISSION STATEMENT contributed over $1.6 billion to the local economy in 2013. Part of the Air Mobility Command, the 60th Air Mobility Wing is responsible for strategic airlift and air refueling missions FAST FACTS circling the globe. The unit's primary roles are to provide rapid, reliable airlift » Location: Solano County, CA (near Fairfield) of American fighting forces anywhere on earth in support of national objectives » Land Area: 6,791 acres and to extend the reach of American and allied air power through mid-air » Special Use Airspace: 322 square nautical miles refueling. -
Air Force September 3, 2007 Memorial Grand Rapids, MI SEE PAGE 19
pp 36 & 1:Spring 2007 4/11/07 3:28 PM Page 1 At the 60th Annual 2ADA Convention Official Publication of the: Air Force August 30 – September 3, 2007 Memorial Grand Rapids, MI SEE PAGE 19 Right: Volume 46 Number 2 Spring 2007 The Bronze Honor Guard. Before There Was an “Air Force” BY RAY PYTEL (445TH) he recent Air Force Memorial dedica- Below: T tion spurred several questions on the predecessors to the Air Corps, the Army Part of the granite Air Forces, and finally the U.S. Air Force. inscription honoring The USAF Historical Division has es- major donors at the tablished a concise official record as a reference tool for historians and re search - base of the memorial. ers in an official volume called Air Force Combat Units of WWII. Rather than tak- ing excerpts, we shall print the “Intro- duction to Early U.S. Airpower”: At the peak of its strength in World War II, the United States Army Air Forces (AAF) had more than 2,400,000 men and women in uniform. There were pilots, nav- igators, bombardiers, flight engineers, gun- The last American aircraft produced before the end of the First World War, the Standard E-1 entered service ners, and radio operators, clerks and typ- in early 1918 but never saw combat. Although it was stable and maneuverable, it proved too slow and under- ists, artists and flautists, teachers, mechan- powered for use as a fighter. Instead, the United States Air Service accepted it for use as an advanced trainer. ics, statisticians, and engineers — for it took many talents and skills to conduct States and Mexico were strained as a result on 18 July 1914, but the legislators pro- and support the war in the air. -
2019 Awards To
AIRLIFT / TANKER QUARTERLY Volume Number FALL 2019 27 04 THE AIRLIFT / TANKER ASSOCIATION Pages 12-15 Air Transportation Career Field “Port Dawgs” and the Air Transportation Legacy Team 2019 HALL OF FAME INDUCTEE 2019 A/TA Pages 26-54 AWARDS A SALUTE Pages 56-65 TO OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS UsingUsingUsingUsing the thethe the latest latestlatest latest AirliftAirlift Support Support AirliftAirlift Support Support technologytechnologytechnologytechnology to toto to provide provideprovide provide thethethethe greatest greatestgreatest greatest good. good.good. good. PhotoPhoto courtesy courtesy of of U.S. U.S. Air Air Force Force PhotoPhoto courtesy courtesy of U.S.of U.S. Air Air Force Force YouYou can’t can’t be be a a force force for for peace peace if if your your equipment equipment isn’t isn’t ready. ready. That’s That’s why why we we YouYou can’t can’t be be a force a force for for peace peace if yourif your equipment equipment isn’t isn’t ready. ready. That’s That’s why why we we partnerpartner with with you you to to offer offer the the performance-based performance-based logistics, logistics, technology technology upgrades, upgrades, partnerpartner with with you you to tooffer offer the the performance-based performance-based logistics, logistics, technology technology upgrades, upgrades, andand reliability reliability improvement improvement programs programs that that will will renew renew aircraft aircraft and and help help deliver deliver andand reliability reliability improvement improvement programs programs that that will will renew renew aircraft aircraft and and help help deliver deliver salvationsalvation as as cost cost effectively effectively as as cargo.