Legal Age for Leaving Children Unsupervised Across Canada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Legal Age for Leaving Children Unsupervised Across Canada Legal Age for Leaving Children Unsupervised Across Canada Mónica Ruiz-Casares & Ivana Radic March, 2015 This study reviewed Canadian (a) statutory norms and jurisprudence to determine age at which children can be left unsupervised and (b) safety, child self-care and babysitting programs. Only three provinces establish a minimum age (12 or 16 years) at which children can be left alone or in charge of other children. Quebec is the only province with an age limit for leaving children unsupervised in a vehicle (seven years). Age is only one of the child factors generally considered by the courts in assessing adequate care and supervision. Canadian social services organizations advise that children under 12 years should not be left at home alone. Policy and advocacy efforts should provide accurate information and support to caregivers and children. Introduction Parents and caregivers often have to make difficult decisions to ensure children’s safety and support while coordinating school-work schedules and facilitating children’s growing independence. In reality, many children regularly spend time home alone unsupervised. As children mature, increasing autonomy may help them “engender responsibility and self-reliance” (Flynn & Rodman, 1989, p. 668). However, lack of supervision has been linked to a number of negative outcomes such as unintentional injuries and death in young children (Petrass, Blitvich, & Finch 2009; 2011; van Beelen et al., 2013; Panzino et al., 2013) and self-harm in adolescents (Richardson et al., 1989; Ruiz-Casares et al., 2012). For parents, the consequences of leaving children without adequate care or supervision may also include legal responsibility. Indeed, in the USA and in Canada, lack of supervision is the most common type of substantiated child neglect (Ruiz-Casares, Trocmé, & Fallon 2012; Hussey, Chang, & Kotch, 2006). Child welfare jurisdictions across the 13 Canadian provinces and territories define supervisory neglect in terms of caregiver behaviors that result in harm or place children at risk of harm (i.e., no observable harm needed to bring legal charges against caregivers) (Ruiz-Casares, Trocmé, & Fallon, 2012). Inadequate parental supervision may encompass behaviors and circumstances that include not watching a child closely enough, using inadequate substitute child care, failing to protect a child from a third party, or allowing a child to engage in a harmful activity (Coohey, 2003; 2008). In this study, we focus on the use of inadequate substitute childcare and particularly leaving a child alone or under the supervision of another child in a vehicle or at home. While other factors such as child’s maturity and context are essential when determining adequate Page 1 of 9 Information Sheet 144E supervision (DePanfilis, 2006), clarifying legal minimum ages below which children shall be presumed not to have the capacity to care for themselves or other children would help guide caregivers and professionals. Findings Legal age limits for leaving children alone at home or in a vehicle in Canada Parents are required to adequately provide for the supervision of their children at all times as they are ultimately responsible for their children’s safety. As indicated in Table 1, the definition of “child” under welfare Acts is linked to the age of majority in seven provinces and territories. One territory defines child as a person under 18 where the age of majority is 19. The remaining five provinces and territories define child as either being or appearing to be under the age of 16. The majority of provinces and territories do not limit the age at which a child can be left alone in their statutory rules. However, in two provinces (Manitoba and New Brunswick), the welfare Acts state that a parent cannot leave a child under the age of 12 unattended without making provision for adequate supervision. In Ontario, the statutory limit is 16 years. When it comes to leaving a child unattended in a vehicle, only Quebec establishes a statutory age limit (seven years). Jurisprudence specifically related to child age and lack of supervision is limited, even where there is a statutory age limit. Indeed, in provinces with a statutory age limit, sometimes the courts applied the statutory rule. For example, the Queen's Bench in Manitoba stated that because children between 19 months and 8 years were left alone, protection was needed1. Other times age did not appear to be a determining factor. For example, an Ontario court concluded that, because the “mother was living a party lifestyle”, there was a serious risk of emotional harm to five year- old child and intervention was necessary2. Where the Statutes are silent as to the age at which a child can be left home alone, the courts have weighed in their position. Most noteworthy is an Alberta case where a father specifically asked if his 11 year old son could be left home alone for 3 hours after school; the court said that children under 12 should not be left unattended by parents during parenting hours3. In Alberta, families appear to be expected to arrange care for children under 12 years (Government of Alberta, 2014). Additionally, in foster/kinship cases, government authorities define "a safe and stable environment for a child" to include ensuring the child under 12 is not left unsupervised (Alberta Human Services, 2012). In most cases, an analysis of lack of supervision of young children is included in a pattern of neglect that leads to a serious risk of negligence for children under 12 years of age4. However, age in itself is not the only or determining factor. In a Nova Scotia case, the court found that leaving a 13 year old child alone overnight in the home did not amount to adequate supervision of the child because that 13 year old was not mature and not responsible enough5; in another case in the same province, the court found that leaving children under five and two years of age unattended for short periods of time (here the mother would exit the home to smoke) was acceptable6. Page 2 of 9 Information Sheet 144E Table 1: Legal Framework for Child Supervision at Home or in a Vehicle in Canada (2014) Child Child Penalties Legal “Child” alone Province/ home age of (Welfare in Situations Imprison Territory alone Fine majority Act) vehicle ment (years) (CAD) (years) (months) Abandonment/loss ≤ Alberta 18 18 − − ≤ 12 Inability/unwillingness to 25,000 supervise Abandonment British Inability/unwillingness to 19 19 − − − − Columbia supervise No/inadequate care provision Inability/unwillingness to ≤ Manitoba 18 18 12 − supervise ≤ 24 50,000 No/inadequate care provision Abandonment/loss ≤ 3 only New Inability/unwillingness to 240 − 19 19 12 − repeat Brunswick supervise 10,200 offence No/inadequate care provision Newfoundland Abandonment ≤ 19 16 − − ≤ 6 and Labrador No/inadequate care provision 10,000 Abandonment Northwest ≤ 19 16 − − ≤ 12 Territories Inability/unwillingness to 10,000 supervise Abandonment Inability/unwillingness to Nova Scotia 19 16 − − supervise − − Permitting criminal behaviour Abandonment ≤ Nunavut 19 16 − − ≤ 12 Inability/unwillingness to 10,000 supervise ≤ Ontario 18 18 16 − No/inadequate care provision ≤ 12 1,000 Prince Edward Abandonment ≤ 18 18 − − − Island No/inadequate care provision 2,000 Abandonment 625 − Quebec 18 18 − 7 − No/inadequate care provision 5,000 Inability/unwillingness to ≤ Saskatchewan 18 16 − − ≤ 24 supervise 25,000 Abandonment Yukon 19 18 − − Inability/unwillingness to − − supervise Sources: Child Welfare, Majority and Traffic Safety Acts of all provinces and territories (see Endnote 7) Page 3 of 9 Information Sheet 144E Unsupervised children in need of protection and legal consequences In situations related to lack of supervision, the law identifies several conditions for a child to become a child in need of protection (Table 1). Expressions vary widely across jurisdictions and include inability or unwillingness to provide adequate care, supervision or control of the child, failing to supervise and protect the child adequately, leaving a child unattended for an unreasonable length of time and failing to make adequate provision for the child’s care, and abandoning, deserting or losing a child. The burden of proof lies with the party bringing the case forward, i.e., the State through its Child Services Department. The State needs to prove (1) the child’s age, for those provinces that have an age limit, (2) that the child was left unattended and (3) that as a consequence, the child was in danger or suffered harm. However, in Ontario, the burden is reversed if the child is under ten years. In that case, the State would simply need to prove (1) that the child was under the age of ten years and (2) that the child was left unattended; the parents need then to prove that the child was not in danger. When a person in charge of a child is found guilty under a Welfare Act, that person commits an offence and may be liable to a fine, imprisonment or both. As listed on Table 1, most provinces and territories provide for such an offence and for the subsequent possibility of penalties: a fine ranging from a minimum of $240 to a maximum of $50,000; imprisonment ranging from a minimum of 3 months to a maximum of 24 months or both a fine and imprisonment; only New Brunswick does not provide for both. Of the provinces and territories that allow for a fine, only two provinces do not also allow for imprisonment (Quebec and Prince Edward Island). No such offence and penalty are provided for in the Welfare Acts of two provinces and one territory (i.e., British Columbia, Nova Scotia and Yukon). Information and support programs for children home alone and their parents Public information provided to families and professionals does not always reflect the text of the law. For example, Toronto Children’s Aid Societies (CAS) indicate on their online informational materials that “there is no law in Ontario that dictates a specific age at which a child can be left unsupervised” (n.d.).
Recommended publications
  • 4-H/Army Child & Youth Services
    4-H/Army Child & Youth Services Instructor Guide I have what it takes to be YOUR Teen Babysitter! 4-H/Army Child & Youth Services Instructor Babysitting Guide This Babysitting Curriculum Guide for Youth is designed to help middle school and teenaged youth learn what it takes to be a responsible, caring, trustworthy, competent, capable and safe babysitter. The core content is based on contributions from the following individuals: Content Development Gretchen May, M. Ed. University of Massachusetts Extension Educator, Communities, Families and Youth Program Content and Editorial Review Bradd Anderson, Youth Development Coordinator, 4-H/Army Youth Development Project, University of Missouri Kerry Bickford, University of Massachusetts Extension Educator, Barnstable County, Communities, Families and Youth Program Virginia Brown, School Age Services Program Manager, Child & Youth Services, Headquarters, Department of the Army Nancy Campbell, Youth Education Support Services Program Manager, Child & Youth Services, Headquarters, Department of the Army Bea Curl, Child & Youth Services Program Specialist, Child & Youth Services, Headquarters, Department of the Army Fort Drum Youth Services staff, Ft. Drum, New York Vicki Hamlin, Outreach Services Program Manager, Child & Youth Services, Headquarters, Department of the Army Massachusetts 4-HH Volunteers: Laurie Baker, Barbara Beausang, Kerry Dyka, Maureen Howard, Donna Miller, Tricia Perry and several youth members of their 4-H clubs Shirley Mietlicki, Ed. D., Asst. Professor, University of Massachusetts
    [Show full text]
  • Playdays Canada an Initiative of International Play Association (Canada)
    PlayDays Canada An Initiative of International Play Association (Canada) Event Hosting Guide Promoting the Child’s Right to Play 1 2 International Play Association (IPA World) IPA World began in 1961 in Copenhagen, Denmark and now has members in nearly 50 countries. The aim and intent of IPA is outlined in Article 31 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which seeks to protect, preserve and promote play for all children worldwide. IPA established the addition of the word ‘play’ to Article 31 in 1980, supporting the global perspective that play is a fundamental part of life. International Play Association Canada (IPA Canada) IPA Canada has been active as a chapter of IPA World since 1983. It protects, preserves and promotes the Child’s Right to Play and is guided by passionate play advocates to uphold Article 31. As an interdisciplinary organization, IPA brings together play animators, planners, psychologists, educators, academics and landscape designers. IPA Canada is supporting the importance of play in Canadian children’s lives through initiatives focused on such areas as children’s environments, play leadership practice and play provision for children experiencing impairment or disability. www.ipacanada.org 3 Contents A. Partners in Play ...................................................................3 B. Introduction .........................................................................5 C. Ingredients for Success ......................................................7 D. Planning: Making the Ordinary !Extraordinary!
    [Show full text]
  • THE Private RESIDENT Governess
    THE -Y OR THE TIGER?: EVOLVING VICTORIAN PERCEOTIONS OF EDUCATION AND THE PRiVATE RESIDENT GOVeRNESS Elizabeth Dana Rescher A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English The University of Toronto G Copyright by Elizabeth Dana Rescher, 1999 National Library Bibliothéque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, nie W@lliigton OttawaON KlAON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fïlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copy~@tin this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenvise de ceNe-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. TEE LADY OR THE TI-?: EVOLVING VfCTORlAW PERCEPTIONS OF EDUCATION MD TEE PRfVATE RESIDENT GOVBRNESS A thesis smrnitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English The University of Toronto by Elizabeth Dana Rescher, 1999 --Abattact-- From the first few decades of the nineteenth century to the 1860s, the governess-figure moved steadily in public estimation from embodiment of pathos to powerful subverter of order, only to revert in the last decades of the 1800s to earlier type.
    [Show full text]
  • Son Preference Or Son Pressure? Narratives of Fertility Decisions from Chinese Female Migrants Felicia Feng Tian Department of S
    Son Preference or Son Pressure? Narratives of Fertility Decisions from Chinese Female Migrants Felicia Feng Tian Department of Sociology Duke University Danielle Kane Department of Sociology and Anthropology DePauw University Ke Liang Department of Sociology and Anthropology Baruch College, The City University of New York 2 ABSTRACT Though son preference has been identified as a major determinant for the imbalanced sex ratios at birth in China, Little about how son preference influences fertility decisions. Most studies either assume Chinese parents prefer sons as rational choices because of sons’ higher wage-earning or the ability to provide old-age support, or for cultural reasons such as lineage preservation and prosperity. By exploring narratives of fertility decisions for 42 Chinese female migrants, this article argues that son preference is not an individual choice per se, nor a joint decision by the couple, but a pressure descending from the upper generation of the husband's family, from mothers-in-law in particular. The results suggest the importance of an intergenerational perspective in exploring son preference in the Chinese context. 3 The sex ratios at birth in China, as defined by the number of boys over 100 girls, has skyrocketed since the 1980s. The officially reported sex ratios at birth have increased from 108.5 in 1982, to 113.8 in 1990, 119.9 in 2000, and 120.5 in 2005 (National Bureau of Statistics 2007). The actual ratio could be slightly lower, if one considers the underreporting of daughters in censuses (Goodkind 2004, 2011; Zeng et al 1993). However, China's sex ratios at birth fall far out of reach of the biological stable range between 104 and 106 (Dyson 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • How Understanding the Aboriginal Kinship System Can Inform Better
    How understanding the Aboriginal Kinship system can inform better policy and practice: social work research with the Larrakia and Warumungu Peoples of the Northern Territory Submitted by KAREN CHRISTINE KING BSW A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Social Work Faculty of Arts and Science Australian Catholic University December 2011 2 STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP AND SOURCES This thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have qualified for or been awarded another degree or diploma. No other person‟s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of the thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. All research procedures reported in the thesis received the approval of the Australian Catholic University Human Research Ethics Committee. Karen Christine King BSW 9th March 2012 3 4 ABSTRACT This qualitative inquiry explored the kinship system of both the Larrakia and Warumungu peoples of the Northern Territory with the aim of informing social work theory and practice in Australia. It also aimed to return information to the knowledge holders for the purposes of strengthening Aboriginal ways of knowing, being and doing. This study is presented as a journey, with the oral story-telling traditions of the Larrakia and Warumungu embedded and laced throughout. The kinship system is unpacked in detail, and knowledge holders explain its benefits in their lives along with their support for sharing this knowledge with social workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Naming Customs Craig L
    Scottish Naming Customs Craig L. Foster AG® [email protected] Origins of Scottish Surnames Surnames are said to have begun to be used by Scottish nobility at the direction of King Malcolm Ceannmor in about 1061. William L. Kirk, Jr. “Introduction to the Derivation of Scottish Surnames,” Clan Macrae (1992), http://www.clanmacrae.ca/documents/names.htm “In some Highland areas, though, fixed surnames did not become the norm until the 18th century, and in parts of the Northern Isles until the 19th century.” “Surnames,” ScotlandsPeople, https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/guides/surnames Types of Scottish Surnames Location-Based Surnames Some people were named for localities. For example, the surname “Murray from the lands of Moray, and Ogilvie, which, according to Black, derives from the barony of Ogilvie in the parish of Glamis, Angus. Tenants might in turn assume, or be given, the name of their landlord, despite having no kinship with him.” Sometimes surnames referred to a specific topographical feature of the landscape such as a river, a loch, a hill, etc. Some examples might include: Names that contain 'kirk' (as in Kirkland, or Selkirk) which means 'church' in Gaelic; 'Muir' or names that contain it (means 'moor' in Gaelic); A name which has 'Barr' in it (this means 'hilltop' in Gaelic). “Surnames,” ScotlandsPeople, https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/guides/surnames Occupational Surnames A significant amount of surnames come from occupations. So a smith became known as Smith or Gow (Gaelic for smith), a tailor became Tailor/Taylor, a baker was Baxter, a weaver was Webster, etc. “Surnames,”ScotlandsPeople, https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/guides/surnames Descriptive Surnames “Nicknames were 'descriptional' ie.
    [Show full text]
  • An Essential Dichotomy in Australian Kinship Tony Jefferies
    11 Close–Distant: An Essential Dichotomy in Australian Kinship Tony Jefferies Abstract This chapter looks at the evidence for the close–distant dichotomy in the kinship systems of Australian Aboriginal societies. The close– distant dichotomy operates on two levels. It is the distinction familiar to Westerners from their own culture between close and distant relatives: those we have frequent contact with as opposed to those we know about but rarely, or never, see. In Aboriginal societies, there is a further distinction: those with whom we share our quotidian existence, and those who live at some physical distance, with whom we feel a social and cultural commonality, but also a decided sense of difference. This chapter gathers a substantial body of evidence to indicate that distance, both physical and genealogical, is a conception intrinsic to the Indigenous understanding of the function and purpose of kinship systems. Having done so, it explores the implications of the close–distant dichotomy for the understanding of pre-European Aboriginal societies in general—in other words: if the dichotomy is a key factor in how Indigenes structure their society, what does it say about the limits and integrity of the societies that employ that kinship system? 363 SKIN, KIN AND CLAN Introduction Kinship is synonymous with anthropology. Morgan’s (1871) Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family is one of the founding documents of the discipline. It also has an immediate connection to Australia: one of the first fieldworkers to assist Morgan in gathering his data was Lorimer Fison, who, later joined by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Babysitter List Feel Free to Call Any of the Professionals on This List to Make Arrangements (Mostly Evening) for in Room Child Care Needs
    The Alta Children’s Center Recommended Babysitter List Feel free to call any of the professionals on this list to make arrangements (mostly evening) for in room child care needs. The rate is set at $22 per hour and is paid directly to your babysitter after services are provided. Flu Background First Aid Name Age Experience Shot checked & CPR Phone # AAS in Early Childhood Education. Child Care Center Director and Teacher of the year Ilse Wilson 36 801 702 7004 award winner. Experience in all ages, especially infants and toddlers BS in Material Science and engineering. 3 Kiana Wright 25 Years babysitting experience in early 856 341 4583 childhood education BA in child development with over 10 years’ Hannah Wally 28 experience in babysitting and nannying. 530 828 9502 Previous Ski Instructor. Has worked in daycare and babysitting for Lori Hill 57 over 10 years. Training in infant and child 801 879 6440 development. Has worked in daycare and babysitting for over 10 years. Has taken several early Linda Sue O’Connor 61 408 966 6126 childhood college courses. Experience in all Ages Experience in all ages and currently finishing up Nursing practicum in pediatric unit. Alexandra Paulson 29 Internship in Kindergarten 15+ years’ 970 640 1122 experience babysitting and has child development education. 9 years of experience and finishing degree in Allison Shrack 27 Early Childhood Education with an emphasis 801 505 2325 on special Ed. Experience in all ages. Several years of babysitting and currently Isabel Aste 19 also a works at a daycare. Experience with 435 659 8911 infants and school age children Worked in daycare and has been a summer Addison Beasley 19 503 866 1955 camp counselor.
    [Show full text]
  • Bereavement Leave
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICE PERSONNEL OPERATIONS MANUAL SUBJECT: BEREAVEMENT LEAVE REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES Bereavement leave allows for up to three (3) eight-hour days (24 hours) per occurrence or three (3) eight-hour days (24 hours) in a fiscal year based on the family member. The following chart describes the family member and bereavement leave allowed per bargaining unit. Bargaining Unit Eligible family member - three (3) eight-hour days Eligible family member - three (3) (24 hours) per occurrence eight-hour days (24 hours) in a fiscal year 1, 4, 11, 14, 15 • Parent • Aunt • Stepparent • Uncle • Spouse • Niece • Domestic Partner • Nephew • Child • immediate family members of • Grandchild Domestic Partners • Grandparent • Brother • Sister • Stepchild • Mother-in-Law • Father-in-Law • Daughter-in-Law • Son-in-Law • Sister-in-Law • Brother-in-Law • any person residing in the immediate household 2 • Parent • Grandchild • Stepparent • Grandparent • Spouse • Aunt • Domestic Partner • Uncle • Child • Niece • Sister • Nephew • Brother • Mother-in-Law • Stepchild • Father-in-Law • any person residing in the immediate household • Daughter-in-Law • Son-in-Law • Sister-in-Law • Brother-in-Law • immediate family member 7 • Parent • Grandchild • Stepparent • Grandparent • Spouse • Aunt • Domestic Partner • Uncle STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICE PERSONNEL OPERATIONS MANUAL Bargaining Unit Eligible family member - three (3) eight-hour days Eligible family member - three (3) (24 hours) per occurrence eight-hour
    [Show full text]
  • God Chose a Father for His Son Matthew 1:18-25
    Father’s Day Sermon God Chose a Father for His Son Matthew 1:18-25 Today is Father’s Day. As most of you know, I am not real big on special days (Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Grand Parent’s Day, etc.) But on this Father’s Day I am going to preach a Christmas sermon. Although that is not exactly true, I am going to talk to you about a father who is very often overlooked, and only mentioned at Christmas. I want to talk to about Joseph, the husband of Mary and the adopted father of Jesus. It seems to me that we often overlook the fact that although God, in His sovereignty, chose Mary to be the one who would give birth to the Son of God, that He also in His mighty providence chose Joseph to be a father to Jesus and to raise Him into manhood. In other words, God chose both Mary and Joseph to be the parents of the Lord of glory. It seems to me this great truth demonstrates for us the role of a father is a very important role in the life of the family. In other words, fathers are not only needed for the physical act of conceiving a child; God reminds us they are also needed for the spiritual act of raising a child. We know, of course, the child was conceived in the womb of Mary, “by the Holy Spirit” - a miracle took place so there was no need for a man to be involved in the conception.
    [Show full text]
  • DCCA Opinion No. 02-CF-1165
    Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 02-CF-1165 THEODORE R. SIMMS, Jr., APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F-1847-01 ) (Hon. Wendell P. Gardner, Jr., Trial Judge) (Argued December 15, 2004 Decided January 27, 2005) Jonathan W. Anderson, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Jaclyn S. Frankfurt, Public Defender Service, were on the brief, for appellant. Emily A. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., United States Attorney at the time the brief was filed, and John R. Fisher, Roy W. McLeese III, Lionel Andre and Toni B. Florence, Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellee. Before SCHWELB and WASHINGTON, Associate Judges, and KRAVITZ, Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of Columbia.* SCHWELB, Associate Judge: Following a jury trial, Theodore R. Simms, Jr., was found guilty of simple assault. The jury acquitted Simms of aggravated assault, first-degree cruelty to children, and second-degree cruelty to children. At the time of the offense, the victim, William Calloway, who was the son of Simms’ fiancée, Pauline Calloway, was fourteen months old. * Sitting by designation pursuant to D.C. Code § 11-707 (a) (2001). 2 On appeal, Simms contends that he was acting in loco parentis and that the trial judge committed reversible error by refusing to instruct the jury on the defense of reasonable parental discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • American Red Cross Babysitter's Training Handbook
    American Red Cross Babysitter’s Training Handbook The following organizations provided review of the materials and/or support for the American Red Cross Babysitter’s Training program: BST_FM_i-vi.indd i 2/20/08 8:03:00 AM Copyright © 2008 by The American National Red Cross All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission from American Red Cross National Headquarters, Preparedness and Health and Safety Services. Content refl ects the 2005 Consensus on Science for CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) and the 2005 Guidelines for First Aid. American Red Cross certifi cates may be issued upon successful completion of a training program, which uses this manual as an integral part of a course. By itself, the material in this handbook does not constitute comprehensive Red Cross training. In order to issue Red Cross certifi cates, your instructor must be authorized by the American Red Cross, and must follow prescribed policies and procedures. Make certain that you have attended a course authorized by the Red Cross. Contact your local American Red Cross chapter (www.redcross.org) for more information. The emergency care procedures outlined in this manual refl ect the standard of knowledge and accepted emergency practices in the United States at the time this manual was published. It is the reader’s responsibility to stay informed of changes in the emergency care procedures. Printed in the United States of America Printing/Binding by RR Donnelly StayWell 780 Township Line Rd.
    [Show full text]