DOCSLIB.ORG

Westminster City Council Election Results 1964-2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Westminster City Council Election Results 1964-2010 Westminster City Council Election Results 1964-2010 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election. The lower graph shows for each main round of local elections the overall percentage turnout (solid line), the percentage of women candidates standing at (dotted line) and the percentage of women among those elected (hashed line). Covent Garden (2143) Lords (10047)3 Westminster - 1964 vote share vote share Dribbell J. Con 261 76.5 Dawe R. Con 2,124 65.3 Griffiths I. Ms. Lab 80 23.5 Sandford H. Con 2,114 - Abbey (2601) Rivington S. Con 2,109 - vote share Turnout 16.1 53.1 Rendel M. Lab 729 22.4 Bishop T. Lab 524 52.7 Cocks D. Lab 726 - Farmiloe L. Con 471 47.3 Dolphin (4174) Wood R. Lab 723 - vote share Cummins M. Lib 399 12.3 Turnout 38.4 5.3 Rawlence M. Con 806 66.7 Lea A. Lib 363 - Wheeler W. Lab 322 26.7 Faircloth K. Lib 356 - Alderney (3876) Ainger W. Lib 80 6.6 vote share Turnout 22.6 42.9 Bramall E. Lab 789 50.0 Turnout 29.2 40.1 Hardiman A. Con 762 48.3 Maida Vale (16471)5 Andrews P. Ms. Lib 27 1.7 Eaton (3355) vote share vote share Brown R. Con 2,814 48.9 Turnout 41.2 1.7 Prendergast C. Con 761 88.7 Brooks W. Con 2,774 - Harris L. Lab 81 9.4 Lane E. Ms. Con 2,765 - Aldwych (2784) Howgego P. Lib 16 1.9 Shersby J. Con 2,747 - vote share O'Connell G. Con 2,739 - Cubitt H. Con 549 54.7 Turnout 25.8 79.3 Dickinson K. Lab 2,504 43.6 Curran J. Lab 454 45.3 Whyte R. Lab 2,493 - Ebury (3036) Cooze J. Lab 2,489 - Turnout 36.4 9.5 vote share Haywood G. Ms. Lab 2,472 - 5 Gay G. Con 752 52.1 Wellin E. Lab 2,452 - Baker Street (13811) Wilson G. Lab 661 45.8 Charlesworth M. Ms. Lib 431 7.5 vote share Howgego G. Ms. Lib 31 2.1 Griffiths D. Lib 394 - Harley G. Con 2,221 - Cowan S. Lib 392 - Hesketh G. Con 2,221 67.0 Turnout 48.0 6.3 Epsztejn L. Ms. Lib 370 - Glenny R. Con 2,220 - Rabin M. Lib 364 - Mordue J. Con 2,196 - Grosvenor (3199) Doyle D. Ms. Con 2,180 - vote share Turnout 35.1 5.4 Hardacre K. Lab 705 21.3 Marsh E. Ms. Con 596 80.6 Heller C. Lab 694 - Whitaker B. Lab 104 14.1 Millbank (4255) Phillips P. Lab 689 - Barnes N. Lib 39 5.3 vote share Mackay D. Lab 686 - Jelley A. Lab 719 47.2 Walters A. Lab 678 - Turnout 23.2 66.6 Creighton K. Con 587 38.5 Gardiner A. Lib 387 11.7 Harris A. Lib 218 14.3 Freitag P. Lib 366 - 5 Harrow Road (15696) Gerrard A. Lib 362 - vote share Turnout 36.3 8.7 Noble I. Lib 343 - Bulmer G. Lab 2,265 69.2 Janis M. Lib 333 - Browne H. Lab 2,257 - Queens Park (6645)2 Goss W. Lab 2,249 - vote share Turnout 24.1 45.8 Harrington I. Lab 2,243 - Lowe G. Lab 1,694 77.3 Dumont A. Lab 2,240 - Bolton I. Ms. Lab 1,665 - Berkeley (3206) Cottrell S. Con 843 25.8 Bratton W. Con 343 15.7 vote share Hodgson H. Con 757 - White E. Con 321 - Wells J. Con 603 93.3 Sheldrake L. Con 726 - Gibbons J. Lib 154 7.0 McDermott G. Lab 22 3.4 Nolloth M. Con 722 - Singer M. Ms. Lib 133 - Capel B. Ms. Lib 21 3.3 Welch A. Con 710 - Vizard R. Comm 164 5.0 Turnout 32.9 61.7 Turnout 20.3 89.9 Turnout 20.2 43.5 Regent Street (9465) Cathedral (4325) vote share vote share Hyde Park (14151)5 Shaw-Kennedy R. Con 319 79.9 Paton Walsh P. Ms. Con 792 68.3 vote share Groves F. Lab 80 20.1 Duffy J. Lab 258 22.3 Gillett J. Con 2,369 71.1 Alder U. Ms. Lib 109 9.4 Rabagliati C. Ms. Con 2,328 - Turnout 28.0 59.9 McNair D. Con 2,327 - Turnout 27.1 46.1 Parkes W. Con 2,301 - Regents Park (9250)3 3 Collins J. Con 2,293 - vote share Cavendish (10406) Doran J. Lab 963 28.9 Hancock E. Con 1,661 61.4 vote share Wegg-Prosser C. Lab 943 - Forrester R. Con 1,635 - Guest J. Con 1,681 73.7 Gray E. Ms. Lab 926 - Marsh J. Con 1,629 - Ashworth H. Con 1,671 - Dunn J. Lab 923 - Powell R. Lab 934 34.5 Pearl L. Con 1,669 - Nagendra S. Lab 881 - Denington C. Lab 932 - Lucan K. Lab 601 26.3 Robins W. Lab 923 - Grenville R. Lab 573 - Turnout 23.6 42.2 Rabstein C. Comm 112 4.1 Fraser O. Lab 572 - Knightsbridge (3649) Turnout 17.8 26.9 Turnout 22.1 47.3 vote share 3 Burton A. Con 852 91.4 Soho (2952) Church Street (8841) Garside M. Ms. Lab 42 4.5 vote share vote share Capel A. Lib 38 4.1 Mares R. Lab 426 52.8 Jacobs L. Lab 1,807 64.6 Stern H. Con 381 47.2 Merriton J. Ms. Lab 1,678 - Turnout 25.6 86.9 Edmonds R. Lab 1,669 - Turnout 27.5 5.6 Pearson J. Con 774 27.7 Lancaster Gate (10889)3 Gimblett C. Con 773 - vote share St. Jamess (2307) Solomons K. Con 761 - Kenyon M. Con 1,752 68.8 vote share Temple L. Comm 218 7.8 Lowry-Corry M. Con 1,749 - Cobbold M. Con 335 88.9 Lugton J. Con 1,720 - Hucklebridge G. Lib 23 6.1 Turnout 30.0 36.9 Richardson K. Lab 795 31.2 Aldis P. Lab 19 5.0 Clark C. Lab 784 - Churchill (4164) Hodges F. Lab 780 - Turnout 16.5 82.8 vote share Bramall G. Ms. Lab 1,089 55.4 Turnout 23.4 37.6 Tachbrook (3343) Tennant A. Ms. Con 824 41.9 vote share Ogilvie P. Comm 53 2.7 Garside H. Lab 803 52.2 Johnston A. Con 734 47.8 Turnout 47.5 13.5 Turnout 46.3 4.5 Results of the London Borough Elections 1964-2012 1 Victoria (2541) Churchill (9259)3 Maida Vale (15910)5 vote share vote share vote share Pugh G. Con 457 84.0 Jonathan M. Ms. Con 1,712 48.0 Brooks W. Con 3,406 71.5 Sylven D. Ms. Lab 87 16.0 Latham M. Con 1,697 - Lane E. Ms. Con 3,364 - Eager A. Con 1,675 - Hodgson H. Con 3,344 - Turnout 21.4 68.0 Tibbles B. Lab 1,399 39.2 Wade G. Con 3,343 - Squires L. Lab 1,377 - Shersby J. Con 3,309 - Warwick (4134) Bramall E. Lab 1,333 - Ryan E. Ms. Lab 1,355 28.5 vote share Smith J. Ms. Lib 323 9.1 Silverman D. Lab 1,335 - Le Marchant S. Con 684 70.2 Clinch A. Lib 288 - Silkin R. Ms. Lab 1,323 - Squires L. Lab 248 25.4 Coverson R. Lib 259 - Dickinson K. Lab 1,321 - Karmel B. Ms. Lib 43 4.4 Leman J. Ind 131 3.7 Doran J. Lab 1,316 - Turnout 23.9 44.7 Turnout 38.3 8.8 Turnout 31.0 43.1 Westbourne (10366)3 Harrow Road (12593)5 Millbank (5757)2 vote share vote share vote share Dow W. Lab 1,667 61.3 Jones M. Con 1,466 51.3 Castle M. Ms. Con 1,268 58.8 Genese C. Lab 1,614 - Hunt B. Con 1,464 - Watson B. Con 1,249 - Packer E. Lab 1,600 - Galitzine E. Ms. Con 1,463 - Garside H. Lab 810 37.6 Crawford P. Con 801 29.5 Terris P. Con 1,399 - Mares R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Johnson 1 C. Johnson: Social Contract And
    C. Johnson: Social Contract and Energy in Pimlico ORIGINAL ARTICLE District heating as heterotopia: Tracing the social contract through domestic energy infrastructure in Pimlico, London Charlotte Johnson UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, London, WC1H 0NN, UK Corresponding author: Charlotte Johnson; e-mail: [email protected] The Pimlico District Heating Undertaking (PDHU) was London’s first attempt at neighborhood heating. Built in the 1950s to supply landmark social housing project Churchill Gardens, the district heating system sent heat from nearby Battersea power station into the radiators of the housing estate. The network is a rare example in the United Kingdom, where, unlike other European states, district heating did not become widespread. Today the heating system supplies more than 3,000 homes in the London Borough of Westminster, having survived the closure of the power station and the privatization of the housing estate it supplies. Therefore, this article argues, the neighborhood can be understood as a heterotopia, a site of an alternative sociotechnical order. This concept is used to understand the layers of economic, political, and technological rationalities that have supported PDHU and to question how it has survived radical changes in housing and energy policy in the United Kingdom. This lens allows us to see the tension between the urban planning and engineering perspective, which celebrates this Johnson 1 system as a future-oriented “experiment,” and the reality of managing and using the system on the estate. The article analyzes this technology-enabled standard of living as a social contract between state and citizen, suggesting a way to analyze contemporary questions of district energy.
    [Show full text]
  • St James Conservation Area Audit
    ST JAMES’S 17 CONSERVATION AREA AUDIT AREA CONSERVATION Document Title: St James Conservation Area Audit Status: Adopted Supplementary Planning Guidance Document ID No.: 2471 This report is based on a draft prepared by B D P. Following a consultation programme undertaken by the council it was adopted as Supplementary Planning Guidance by the Cabinet Member for City Development on 27 November 2002. Published December 2002 © Westminster City Council Department of Planning & Transportation, Development Planning Services, City Hall, 64 Victoria Street, London SW1E 6QP www.westminster.gov.uk PREFACE Since the designation of the first conservation areas in 1967 the City Council has undertaken a comprehensive programme of conservation area designation, extensions and policy development. There are now 53 conservation areas in Westminster, covering 76% of the City. These conservation areas are the subject of detailed policies in the Unitary Development Plan and in Supplementary Planning Guidance. In addition to the basic activity of designation and the formulation of general policy, the City Council is required to undertake conservation area appraisals and to devise local policies in order to protect the unique character of each area. Although this process was first undertaken with the various designation reports, more recent national guidance (as found in Planning Policy Guidance Note 15 and the English Heritage Conservation Area Practice and Conservation Area Appraisal documents) requires detailed appraisals of each conservation area in the form of formally approved and published documents. This enhanced process involves the review of original designation procedures and boundaries; analysis of historical development; identification of all listed buildings and those unlisted buildings making a positive contribution to an area; and the identification and description of key townscape features, including street patterns, trees, open spaces and building types.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioning Case Study Co-Production of Early Years Services in Queen’S Park
    Commissioning case study Co-production of early years services in Queen’s Park co-design whole-systems model cost–benefit analysis community champions early years services of the community with the intention of reversing generations of state dependency and of reforming The headlines hyper-local public and community services. A community meeting was held to discuss priorities and residents raised particular concerns about gang l Westminster City Council’s children’s services violence and more broadly about the quality and department and Central London Community Health availability of services and support for children and are committed to a neighbourhood-based co-design young people. Early years was chosen by residents of children’s centre services. to be the focus of the neighbourhood community budget pilot. It was estimated that in the four years l The neighbourhood community budget pilot that would follow the launch of the pilot around one has provided an opportunity to develop and test thousand new children would be born in the Queen’s an integrated, whole-systems model for the delivery Park ward. The ambition for the community was for of early years services, with residents and partner these children to benefit from a progressive reduction agencies working together in new ways. of risk in their later years. l The pace of change within different organisations When deciding on the early years focus, residents represented on a partnership is not consistent made the point that they were concerned not solely and this has to be taken into account when with money but also with the way in which the establishing a timeline for co-designing and design of services took place largely unseen by the co-commissioning services.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster City Plan Consolidated with All Changes Since November 2013Enovember
    Westminster City Plan Consolidated with all changes since November 2013eNovember Revision to Westminster's City Plan November 2016 This November 2016 version incorporates all changes since November 2013, including those made as part of the Mixed Use Revision, Basements Revision, Special Policy Areas Revision and Policies Map Revision. Maps reproduced from Ordinance Survey mapping with the sanction of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. City of Westminster 2009 LA 100019597. Land Use Pie Charts for areas in Part III are based on pipeline data from Westminster City Council’s land use monitoring. Photographic references: Page 12: “Pumphouse, Pimlico District Heating Undertaking” by Jodi Squirmelia Page 16: Image of Westminster by Wenzer Holler dated 1647 reproduced with permission of Westminster City Archives Page 43: Photograph courtesy of Savile Row Bespoke Page 46: ‘A literary party at Sir Joshua Reynolds’’ Page 63: Legible London photograph from Transport for London Page 102: Carmine, Merchant Square, Paddington, W2 . Client: European Land & Property Ltd. Architect: Mossessian & Partners Page 117: Gap House, Bayswater, W2. Client: Luke Tozer. Architect: Pitman Tozer Page 137: Hybrid Bus from Volvo Page 143: Westminster Academy, Harrow Road, W2. Client: Westminster Academy, Westminster City Council, DCSB and Exilarch Foundation. Architect: Tim Soar/Alford Hall Monaghan. Page 146: Aerial photo from www.maps.live.com Page 154: Composite image from CityWest Homes Page 158: Oxford Street photograph from Transport for London taken by Ian Bell Page 160: Underground photograph from Transport for London FOREWORD Welcome to Westminster’s City Plan Westminster is unique.
    [Show full text]
  • PDU Case Report XXXX/YY Date
    planning report D&P/3170/02 18 December 2013 Tollgate Gardens, Maida Vale in the City of Westminster planning application no. 13/05695 Strategic planning application stage II referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Estate regeneration comprising retention of Tollgate House, demolition of Godwin and Wingfield House and redevelopment of buildings up to 9 storeys to contain 248 residential units, together with a new community centre, landscaping, parking and public realm works. The applicant The applicant is Westminster City Council and the architect is BDP. Strategic issues The principle of the redevelopment of the estate at the density proposed has been supported to date, noting that there is no net loss of housing or affordable units. Further information has been provided in relation to the proposed affordable housing provision and it has been demonstrated that the maximum reasonable amount is being proposed. Clarification has been provided in relation to outstanding issues raised at Stage 1 and the scheme is in accordance with the London Plan. The Council’s decision In this instance Westminster City Council has resolved to grant permission. Recommendation That Westminster Council be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority. Context 1 On 15 July 2013 the Mayor of London received documents from Westminster City Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Retrofittingsoho
    BIBLIOGRAPHY RETROFITTINGSOHO Bibliography (Note: All websites viewed between 1 October and 24 November 2008) AEA Energy & Environment. 2008. Review of the Carbon Limited. Carbon Trust micro CHP report is finally Potential Impact on Air Quality from Increased Wood out. <carbonlimited.org/2007/11/27/carbon-trust-micro- Fuelled Biomass Use in London. London: London chp-interim-report-finally-out/>. Councils Transport & Environment Committee. Available Carlsen. J. 2008. Sustainable design and construction from: UK city update – London. 29 April 2008, Presentation. <www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/London%20Councils/Tran sport/Transport%20Publications/Item18ThePotentialImp Chamra, L.M. 2007. Propane-Fuelled Combined Heat actonAirQualityfromIncreased.doc>. and Power (CHP) Systems for Residential Applications, Mississippi State University. Available from: ARUP. Geotechnics- Embodied Energy and Embodied <www.propane.tx.gov/research/documents/06ChamraR Carbon. esidentialCHPSystems.pdf>. <www.arup.com/geotechnics/feature.cfm?pageid=1092 9>. Chazan, D. 2008. ‘Office block warmed by body heat’. BBC News, 7 February. BCIS. 2006. How long do building components last? <news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7233123.stm>; New report provides answers to the most difficult <www.jernhusen.se/templates/Page.aspx?id=944>. question in whole life costing, Press release 19 October. Available from: CityWest Homes. The History of PDHU. <www.bcis.co.uk/NR/rdonlyres/42D4A542-83B9-4A70- <www.cwh.org.uk/main.asp?page=494>. 90D0-DA57A077190B/0/LifeExpectancyPR2006.doc>. Clark, P. 2007. Beyond Ground source Heat Pumps. BERR. Low Carbon Buildings Programme, Department Building, 9 October. for Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform. <http://www.building.co.uk/sustain_story.asp?sectionco <www.lowcarbonbuildings.org.uk/>. de=747&storycode=3097129&c=3>.
    [Show full text]
  • The West End Developing Westminster’S Local Plan
    THE WEST END DEVELOPING WESTMINSTER’S LOCAL PLAN Booklet No. 19 Westminster’s City Plan Revision December 2014 FOREWORD CLLR ROBERT DAVIS In 2012, Westminster City Council convened the independent West End Commission to review, explore and set out recommendations for the continued and future success of the West End of London. The Commission reported in early 2013, and a partnership of local and regional agencies and business and resident stakeholders has been formed to address the challenges raised and deliver change . Conceived as the starting point for our response to the strategic issues and opportunities highlighted by the West End Commission, this booklet differs from others in this series as it brings forward fresh thinking around our approach to the West End and invites an open and forward-thinking debate around its future. The West End is incredibly successful, but we must work to ensure it remains one of the greatest places in the world for culture, entertainment, shopping, eating out, working and living. The West End is made up of distinctive and unique places, borne out of their layers of history: it is that eclectic mix and small-scale reinvention which makes the West End the destination of choice. We need to plan proactively to meet the West End’s challenges: bringing forward more floorspace to meet the demands for housing and a whole range of businesses through sensitive development; providing the infrastructure and networks needed in the 21st century; and managing the pressures generated by success to enable the West End to function properly. A strong West End economy will support a strong London, and UK economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen's Park and Paddington Health Profile
    Queen’s Park and Paddington Health Profile Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) Report Hammersmith and Fulham Kensington and Chelsea Westminster [August 2016] www.jsna.info This report This report provides a descriptive overview of the demographics and health and wellbeing needs of the population in the Queen’s Park and Paddington Area (QPP). The aim of this report is to inform Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and others about: 1. How the population that is resident in the geographical area of the CCGs differs from the population that is resident in the geographical area of the local authorities. 2. Where the population resident in QPP is registered. Authors and contributors This report was written by the Public Health Intelligence Team (Hammersmith and Fulham, Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster). Rianne van der Linde Andrew Rixom Gayan Perera Thilina Jayatilleke Chrisa Tsiarigli Colin Brodie Jessica Nyman Contact: [email protected] Abbreviations CCG Clinical Commissioning Group CL CCG Central London CCG LA Local Authority LSOA Lower Super Output Area MSOA Middle Super Output Area QPP Queen’s Park and Paddington WCC Westminster City Council WL CCG West London CCG Tri-borough Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Report [2016] 2 CONTENTS Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. 2 1 Executive summary ....................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster's Energy Challenges and Opportunities
    Westminster’s Energy Challenges and Opportunities Joe Baker Go Green Programme Manager Population and Society • 244,400 residential population (ONS, MYE 2005) City of Westminster • Wide range of projections in future growth of the population to 2016 to between 301,000 to 350,000 • 150 languages spoken • 50% adult population educated to degree level but 12% of residents have no educational qualifications • Average house price in Westminster is £590,000 yet Westminster is the 39th most deprived out of 354 local authority districts in England Employment and economic activity • Largest employment centre in the UK - 550,000 jobs (14% of all London’s jobs) & 47,000 businesses • GDP of £16 billion • 9 million sqm office floorspace - largest office centre in UK • 8,500 retail premises - 2.2 million sqm retail space • 26.3 million visitors in 2005 - 430 hotels - 40% London’s hotel stock • 38 theatres, 60 cinema screens, 18 casinos & over 3,000 eating, drinking or nightlife establishments Development Activity • Busiest planning authority in UK - 10,000 City of Westminster applications a year Heritage • 55 conservation areas (78% of Westminster’s area) & over 11,000 listed buildings • 1 World Heritage Site, 5 Royal Parks & 21 historic squares and gardens Housing • Stock 115,600 residential units - split 35% owner occupied, 36% private rented and 29% social housing • 9,639 new units built between 1997-2005/6 Transport • 4 main line stations with direct airport connections to Paddington and Victoria. Victoria alone has 76.5 million passengers a year • 10 out of 12 underground lines & 79 bus routes • Proposed Crossrail 1 & 2 routes & Cross River Tram • Intense pedestrian activity e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Councillor Richard Beddoe Cabinet Member for Place Shaping and Planning
    Westminster City Council westminster.gov.uk Councillor Richard Beddoe Cabinet Member for Place Shaping and Planning Westminster City Hall 64 Victoria Street London SW1E 6QP (020) 7641 2621 [email protected] Tuesday 11 June 2019 The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) ‘Neighbourhood Portion’ application process We are a Council that takes great pride in putting local people at the heart of local development and decision making. Thanks to the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) there is now a growing pot of money that we are inviting local groups to bid for to make real and lasting improvements they would like to see in their neighbourhoods. The CIL is a charge applied to development to help fund both strategic and local infrastructure projects in Westminster. Some of the funds that are collected are called the `neighbourhood portion’ which is for local people to propose where they want to see things made better. The Council currently has just over £6m in this pot which is now open for community bids, although there is not an equal split in terms of the amount available for each area. The way the system works is that where there’s more development there is a larger pot of money to spend in that area. There are currently funds available so that nearly every part of the city can benefit from neighbourhood CIL projects. You can see how much money is available in each area in Appendix A. What’s most exciting about neighbourhood CIL projects is that it is for local people to come together and put forward proposals, through an application process, for what they want to see improved in their area with support from the Council to make it happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus On: W2 Focus On: W2
    W2 in focus Park-view premiums Outlook Focus on: W2 2021 knightfrank.com/research FOCUS ON: W2 FOCUS ON: W2 NORTHERN PROMISE by schemes such as One Hyde Park and With easy access into the West End at Paddington from late 2021, the Bordered by Notting Hill, Kensington Gardens and Marylebone, and with One Kensington Gardens. Kensington and the City via tube, and a short walk spotlight is on W2 now more than ever. significant funding committed to landmark regeneration served by a new Palace Gardens, one of London’s best- from the new Elizabeth Line service Elizabeth Line, W2 is a prime central London neighbourhood to watch. known addresses, lies to the west of the park. Yet W2, the postcode with the MAP 1: AVERAGE SOLD PRICES SURROUNDING HYDE PARK longest park frontage, does not seem to 2020 ituated between the prime Similarly Queensway, an historic have capitalised on this. S residential markets of Kensington, shopping parade that runs through the Our analysis shows that average sales Notting Hill and Marylebone and area as its central spine, has retail units prices in W2 stood at just over £1 million HYDE PARK ESTATE Bond Street Marble Arch W located on the edge of Hyde Park, W2 with rents at a fraction of prime West End in 2020, some 22% lower than average NOTTING HILL Bayswater Lancaster occupies an enviable position in prime shopping streets just over a mile away. values in neighbouring Notting Hill, and Gate central London. However, over the next few years this more than 70% lower than in Kensington Queensway MAYFAIR Notting Yet this district, which includes looks set to change.
    [Show full text]
  • WCC Strand Aldwych Consultation Response
    WCC Strand Aldwych Consultation Response March 2019 About us Collectively, we represent most of the Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) in the City of Westminster through our seven constituent organisations: • Baker Street Quarter Partnership • Heart of London Business Alliance • Marble Arch Partnership • New West End Company • PaddingtonNow • Victoria BID • Victoria Westminster BID On behalf of our members, we are making a joint response to Westminster City Council’s (WCC) consultation on the Strand Aldwych proposals. Our response Traffic + walking and cycling links We welcome WCC’s proposals to change the existing one-way Aldwych gyratory. We note that the existing streetscape is overwhelmingly dictated by the one-way gyratory, which prioritises vehicular traffic at the expense of all other users. We support the addition of new, widened pedestrian crossings as well as dedicated cycle lanes, which will help to prioritise pedestrians and cyclists over vehicular traffic and reduce the existing inadequate conditions for both groups in the Strand/Aldwych area. Our members support the reintroduction of two-way traffic operations and note that this will help to reduce vehicle speeds and congestion by providing a better traffic management solution for this area. page 1 of 3 The addition of dedicated bus, cycle and taxi access only lanes at the Aldwych/St Clement Danes Junction and Surrey Street/Strand East are welcomed and we note that this will encourage public transport use, as a result of the loss of the Strand/A4 connection between Waterloo Bridge and Arundel Street. We would ask that Westminster City Council consider the affect that any proposals will have on increased traffic in the surrounding area, especially on the A40 towards Oxford Circus and Oxford Street.
    [Show full text]