DOCSLIB.ORG

Kachemak Bay Birds Checklist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kachemak Bay Birds Checklist LEGEND SPECIES Sp Su F W Status SPECIES Sp Su F W Status SPECIES Sp Su F W Status __Greater Scaup C C C C rmb __Red-tailed Hawk C C C - sb Laridae - Gulls & Terns C Common - Easily found in small to large numbers in __Lesser Scaup U - U - m __Rough-legged Hawk U U U - sb __Franklin’s Gull - A - - v appropriate habitat. __Steller’s Eider C R C C w __Golden Eagle R R R A s __Black-headed Gull - A - - v __Spectacled Eider - - - A v Falconidae - Falcons __Bonaparte’s Gull C C C R sb U Uncommon - Occasionally, but not always, found in small __King Eider R R R R w __American Kestrel R R R - m __Black-tailed Gull - A - - v numbers with some effort in appropriate habitat. __Common Eider C C C U rb __Merlin U C R R sb __Mew Gull C C C C rb __Harlequin Duck C C C C rb __Gyrfalcon R R R R w __Ring-billed Gull A - - A v R Rare - occurs in very small numbers or in a very limited __Surf Scoter C C C C rm __Peregrine Falcon U U R R sb __California Gull - - A - v number of sites and may not be found every year or even with __White-winged Scoter C C C C rm Rallidae - Rails, Coots & Gallinules __Herring Gull C C C C r concentrated effort. There are more than a few records of __Black Scoter C C C C rmb __American Coot - - A - v __Heermann’s Gull - A - - v these species in appropriate habitats. __Long-tailed Duck C R C C w Gruidae - Cranes __Thayer’s Gull R A R R v __Bufflehead C R C C rmb __Sandhill Crane C C C - smb __Lesser Black-backed Gull - A - - v A - Accidental - Represents an exceptional occurrence of birds __Common Goldeneye C C C C rb Charadriidae - Plovers __Slaty-backed Gull R A A R v outside their normal range that might not be repeated again for __Barrow’s Goldeneye C C C C rmb __Black-bellied Plover C U U A m __Western Gull - A - - v decades. __Hooded Merganser A - A - v __American Golden-Plover U R U - m __Glaucous-winged Gull C C C C rb __Common Merganser C C C C rb __Pacific Golden-Plover C R U - m __Glaucous Gull U R U U w STATUS __Red-breasted Merganser C C C C rb __Semipalmated Plover C C C - smb __Sabine’s Gull R R R - v r - resident __Ruddy Duck - - A - v __Killdeer R R - - v __Black-legged Kittiwake C C R U sb b - confirmed breeder Phasianidae - Pheasants & Grouse Haematopodidae - Oystercatchers __Ross’s Gull - A - - v s - summer resident __Ring-necked Pheasant C C C C rbi __Black Oystercatcher C C U U sb __Caspian Tern R R - - v w - winter resident __Spruce Grouse C C C C rb Scolopacidae - Sandpipers & Phalaropes __Arctic Tern C C R - sb m - migrant - passing through on way to summer or winter __Willow Ptarmigan U U U U rb __Greater Yellowlegs C C C - sb __Aleutian Tern C C - - sb grounds, may only be found in narrow periods of time __Rock Ptarmigan U U U U rb __Lesser Yellowlegs U U U - sb __White-winged Tern - A - - v v - visitor, not on normal migration route __White-tailed Ptarmigan R R R R rb __Solitary Sandpiper R U R - sb Stercorariidae - Jaegers i - introduced species Gaviidae - Loons __Wandering Tattler C C C - s __Pomarine Jaeger U U R - m __Red-throated Loon C U C U rm __Spotted Sandpiper C C C - sb __Parasitic Jaeger U U R - sb Sp - spring: March - May F - fall: Sept. - Nov. __Pacific Loon C U C C rb __Whimbrel C C C - sm __Long-tailed Jaeger R R R - v Su - summer: June - Aug. W - winter: Dec. - Feb. __Common Loon C C C C rb __Bristle-thighed Curlew A - - - m Alcidae - Auks, Murres & Puffins __Yellow-billed Loon U U R U wr __Hudsonian Godwit U R - - m __Common Murre C C C C rb Podicipedidae - Grebes __Bar-tailed Godwit U A R - m __Thick-billed Murre A A A R w SPECIES Sp Su F W Status __Horned Grebe C U C C rm __Marbled Godwit U R A - m __Pigeon Guillemot C C C C rb __Red-necked Grebe C C C C rmb __Ruddy Turnstone U R R - m __Marbled Murrelet C C C C rb Anatidae - Swans, Geese & Ducks __Eared Grebe - - A - v __Black Turnstone C U U - m __Kittlitz’s Murrelet C C C U rb __Greater White-fronted Goose C C U A m Procellariidae - Shearwaters __Surfbird C C C - sm __Ancient Murrelet R U U R s __Emperor Goose R A - R v __Northern Fulmar R R R - sr __Red Knot U R R - m __Cassin’s Auklet - R R - v __Snow Goose R - U - m __Sooty Shearwater U C C - v __Sanderling U U U R m __Parakeet Auklet A A A - v __Ross’s Goose A - - - v __Short-tailed Shearwater U U U - v __Semipalmated Sandpiper U R U - m __Crested Auklet R A A R v __Cackling Goose C U C - m Hydrobatidae - Storm-Petrels __Western Sandpiper C C C - m __Rhinoceros Auklet A R R - v __Brant C C R A m __Fork-tailed Storm-Petrel C C C - sr __Red-necked Stint A A - - v __Horned Puffin C C C R sb __Trumpeter Swan C U C R smb __Leach’s Storm-Petrel - R R - v __Temminck’s Stint A - - - v __Tufted Puffin C C C - sb __Tundra Swan U U U - m Phalacrocoracidae - Cormorants __Least Sandpiper C U U - smb Columbidae - Pigeons & Doves __Gadwall U R R - m __Brandt’s Cormorant - A - - v __Baird’s Sandpiper R R U - m __Rock Pigeon C C C C ri __Eurasian Wigeon U R R R m __Double-crested Cormorant U U U R r __Pectoral Sandpiper C U C - m __Eurasian Collared-Dove - A - - vi __American Wigeon C C C U smb __Red-faced Cormorant C C C R rb __Sharp-tailed Sandpiper - - U - m __Mourning Dove - - A A v __Mallard C C C C rmb __Pelagic Cormorant C C C C rb __Rock Sandpiper C R U C w Strigidae - Owls __Blue-winged Teal A - A - m Ardeidae - Herons __Dunlin C U U R m __Western Screech-Owl - A - - v __Northern Shoveler C U U R m __Great Blue Heron R R R R v __Stilt Sandpiper - - R - m __Great Horned Owl C C C C rb __Northern Pintail C U C A smb Cathartidae - New World Vultures __Ruff A - - - v __Snowy Owl R - - R w __Green-winged Teal C C C R s __Turkey Vulture - - A - v __Short-billed Dowitcher C C U - m __Northern Hawk-Owl R R R R ir __Canvasback U - R - m Accipitridae - Eagles & Hawks __Long-billed Dowitcher U U U - sm __Great Gray Owl R R R R v __Redhead U - R - m __Osprey R R R - m __Jack Snipe - - A - v __Short-eared Owl U U R R sb __Common Pochard A - - - v __Bald Eagle C C C C rb __Wilson’s Snipe C C C R sb __Boreal Owl U U U U r __Ring-necked Duck U R U - mb __Northern Harrier C U U R sb __Red-necked Phalarope C C C - sb __Northern Saw-whet Owl U U U U rb __Sharp-shinned Hawk C C C U rb __Red Phalarope A A A - v __Northern Goshawk C C C C rb SPECIES Sp Su F W Status SPECIES Sp Su F W Status SPECIES Sp Su F W Status Caprimulgidae - Goatsuckers __Gray-cheeked Thrush U U U - sb __Cassin’s Finch A - - A v __Common Nighthawk A A - - v __Swainson’s Thrush C C U - sb __Red Crossbill R R R R v Checklist of Trochilidae - Hummingbirds __Hermit Thrush C C C A sb __White-winged Crossbill C C C C b __Anna’s Hummingbird - - R A v __American Robin C C C U sb __American Goldfinch - - - A v __Rufous Hummingbird U U U - smb __Varied Thrush C C C U sb __Common Redpoll C C C C rb Alcedinidae - Kingfishers Sturnidae - Starlings __Hoary Redpoll R - R R w __Belted Kingfisher C C C U rb __European Starling - - R R vi __Pine Siskin C C C C rb Picidae - Woodpeckers Motacillidae - Pipits and Wagtails BIRDS __Red-breasted Sapsucker - - R R v __Eastern Yellow Wagtail - A - - v __Downy Woodpecker C C C C rb __White Wagtail - A - - v __Hairy Woodpecker U U U U rb __American Pipit C C C R s There are 204 species of birds represented on this list. The __American Three-toed Bombycillidae - Waxwings area covers the Anchor River drainage, the watersheds draining Woodpecker U U U U rb __Bohemian Waxwing - R C C m into Kachemak Bay including all of Kachemak Bay State Park, of Kachemak Bay, __Black-backed Woodpecker R R R R rb __Cedar Waxwing R R R R rb and the Bay itself. The northern boundary crosses the southern __Northern Flicker R R R R r Calcariidae - Longspurs and Snow Buntings end of the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge; the eastern border Tyrannidae - Flycatchers __Lapland Longspur C R C R m coincides with the western boundary of Kenai Fjords National __Olive-sided Flycatcher R U U - sb __Smith’s Longspur A - - - v Park and runs in the highlands above the southern drainages to Alaska __Western Wood-Pewee R R - - sb __Snow Bunting U - - U w Kachemak Bay down to Point Pogibshi. Some of the species on __Alder Flycatcher R C C - sb __McKay’s Bunting - - - A v this list can only be seen on the South side of Kachemak Bay or __Say’s Phoebe R R R - m Parulidae – Wood Warblers in other areas off of the road system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Listing Proposal for Mccown's Longspur
    Listing Proposal for McCown’s Longspur (Rhynchophanes mccownii) in Nebraska Photo by Shawn Billerman Prepared by Melissa J. Panella and Joel G. Jorgensen Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Lincoln, Nebraska April 2018 Introduction The Nebraska Game and Parks Commission (hereafter, Commission) is authorized under the Nebraska Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation Act (NESCA; Neb. Rev. Stat. § 37-801 to 37-811) to determine what species should be placed on the list of threatened or endangered species maintained under the act. Species that are listed as threatened or endangered federally are automatically placed on the state’s list of threatened or endangered species; however, there are additional unlisted species whose continued existence within our state is at- risk and who are candidates for state listing. The Commission is obligated to conduct a review of species when monitoring data or emerging issues indicate concern. In 2017, Commission staff undertook a review of the state’s wildlife, including plants, to determine whether any species warranted placement on the list or whether any species currently listed as threated or endangered should be removed from the list. The last full review and revision of the list occurred in 2000. The purpose of the current statewide review is to maintain an accurate list of threatened and endangered species, based on the best information available, to help the Commission complete its mission of effectively conserving the wildlife resources of Nebraska. Over the last several months, Wildlife Division staff received input from species’ experts, conducted extensive literature reviews, and coordinated with the Commission’s Fisheries and Planning and Programming divisions to develop a list of species to consider for listing action.
    [Show full text]
  • Kendall Birds
    Kendall-Frost Reserve Breeding Common Name Scientific Name Regulatory Status Status Waterfowl - Family Anatidae Brant Branta bernicla W Special Concern Gadwall Ana strepera W American Wigeon Anas americana W Mallard Anas platyrhynchos Y Cinnamon Teal Anas cyanoptera W Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata W Northern Pintail Anas acuta W Green-winged Teal Anas crecca W Redhead Aythya americana W Lesser Scaup Aythya affinis W Bufflehead Bucephala albeola W Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator W Ruddy Duck Oxyura jamaicensis W Loons - Family Gaviidae Common Loon Gavia immer W Special Concern Grebes - Family Podicipedidae Pied-billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps W Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus W Eared Grebe Podiceps nigricollis W Western Grebe Aechmophorus occidentalis W Clark's Grebe Aechmophorus clarkii W Pelicans - Family Pelecanidae Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis Y Endangered Frigatebirds - Family Fregatidae Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens X Cormorants - Family Phalacrocoracide Double-crested Cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus Y Herons and Bitterns - Family Ardeidae Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias Y Great Egret Ardea alba Y Snowy Egret Egretta thula Y Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea Y Green Heron Butorides virescens Y Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax Y Hawks, Kites and Eagles - Family Accipitridae Osprey Pandion haliaetus Y White-tailed Kite Elanus leucurus W Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus W Special Concern Cooper's Hawk Accipiter cooperii Y Red-shouldered Hawk Buteo lineatus Y Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Establishments and Extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus Bassanus Colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008
    Recent establishments and extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus bassanus colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008 Robert T. Barrett Barrett, R.T. 2008. Recent establishments and extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus bassanus colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008. – Ornis Norvegica 31: 172-182. Since the last published review of the development of the Northern Gannet Morus bassanus population in Norway (Barrett & Folkestad 1996), there has been a general increase in numbers breeding in North Norway from ca. 2200 occupied nests in 1995 to ca. 2700 in 2008. In Lofoten and Vesterålen, however, numbers have decreased from 1500 occupied nests in 1989 to 500 in 2008, and what were the two largest colonies on Skarvklakken and Hovsflesa have been abandoned. Small colonies have, in the meantime, been established in the region, but these are all characteristically unstable. A new colony established in Troms in 2001 increased to 400 occupied sites in 2007, but the population dropped to 326 in 2008. Harassment by White-tailed eagles Haliaeetus albicilla is mooted as the main cause of the decline in Lofoten and Vesterålen. Robert T. Barrett, Dept. of Natural Science, Tromsø University Museum, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway. INTRODUCTION the well-established colonies, Skarvklakken and Hovsflesa in the north of the country, there were Apart from perhaps the Great Skua Catharacta even signs of declines between 1991 and 1995. skua, there is no species whose establishment as a This paper documents the subsequent fate of the breeding bird in Norway and subsequent popula- North Norwegian colonies, including the extinc- tion development has been so well documented tion of some and the establishment of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Double-Crested Cormorant Management
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Double-crested Cormorant Management Quick Facts Current Status • Cormorants have been In October 2003, the U.S. Fish and protected under the federal Wildlife Service released a Final Rule Migratory Bird Treaty Act since and Record of Decision allowing more 1972 after their populations flexibility in the control of double- dropped precipitously as a result crested cormorants where they are of factors such as use of the causing damage to aquaculture and pesticide DDT. public resources such as fisheries, vegetation or other birds. • Today, cormorant populations are at historic highs in many The rule expands an aquaculture areas due in large part to the depredation order that has been in presence of ample food in their place in 13 states since 1998 to allow summer and winter ranges, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s federal and state protection, and reduced contaminant levels. Wildlife Services division to conduct winter roost control. It also establishes Hot Topic • The total estimated a public resource depredation order to population of double-crested allow state wildlife agencies, tribes and cormorants in North America is Wildlife Services to conduct cormorant Michigan Initiates Cormorant control to protect public resources in 24 approximately 2 million birds. Management Plan: states, including Illinois, Indiana, In May, USDA Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Wildlife Services and the U.S. Fish Management Needs Missouri, Ohio and Wisconsin. Without and Wildlife Service released the these depredation orders, agencies and final Environmental Assessment • Any agency that wants to individuals would not be able to control spelling out plans to reduce double- control double-crested cormorant cormorants without a federal permit.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of the Neotropic Cormorant Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) Brasilianus (Aves, Phalacrocoracidae) in Chile
    Original Article ISSN 1984-2961 (Electronic) www.cbpv.org.br/rbpv Parasites of the Neotropic cormorant Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) brasilianus (Aves, Phalacrocoracidae) in Chile Parasitos da biguá Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) brasilianus (Aves, Phalacrocoracidae) do Chile Daniel González-Acuña1* ; Sebastián Llanos-Soto1,2; Pablo Oyarzún-Ruiz1 ; John Mike Kinsella3; Carlos Barrientos4; Richard Thomas1; Armando Cicchino5; Lucila Moreno6 1 Laboratorio de Parásitos y Enfermedades de Fauna Silvestre, Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile 2 Laboratorio de Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile 3 Helm West Lab, Missoula, MT, USA 4 Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Santo Tomás, Concepción, Chile 5 Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina 6 Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile How to cite: González-Acuña D, Llanos-Soto S, Oyarzún-Ruiz P, Kinsella JM, Barrientos C, Thomas R, et al. Parasites of the Neotropic cormorant Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) brasilianus (Aves, Phalacrocoracidae) in Chile. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2020; 29(3): e003920. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612020049 Abstract The Neotropic cormorant Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) brasilianus (Suliformes: Phalacrocoracidae) is widely distributed in Central and South America. In Chile, information about parasites for this species is limited to helminths and nematodes, and little is known about other parasite groups. This study documents the parasitic fauna present in 80 Neotropic cormorants’ carcasses collected from 2001 to 2008 in Antofagasta, Biobío, and Ñuble regions. Birds were externally inspected for ectoparasites and necropsies were performed to examine digestive and respiratory organs in search of endoparasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccown's Longspur (Rhynchophanes Mccownii)
    McCown’s Longspur (Rhynchophanes mccownii ) A Species Conservation Assessment for The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project Prepared by Melissa J. Panella Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Wildlife Division November 2012 The mission of the Nebraska Natural Legacy Project is to implement a blueprint for conserving Nebraska’s flora, fauna and natural habitats through the proactive, voluntary conservation actions of partners, communities and individuals. Purpose The primary goal in development of at-risk species conservation assessments is to compile biological and ecological information that may assist conservation practitioners in making decisions regarding the conservation of species of interest. The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project recognizes the McCown’s Longspur ( Rhynchophanes mccownii ) as a Tier I at- risk species. Some general management recommendations are made here regarding the McCown’s Longspur (MCLO); however, conservation practitioners will need to use professional judgment to make specific management decisions based on objectives, location, and a multitude of variables. This resource was designed to share available knowledge of MCLO that will aid in the decision-making process or in identifying research needs for the benefit of the species. Species conservation assessments should not be stagnant documents but rather will need to be updated as new scientific information becomes available. The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project focuses efforts in the state’s Biologically Unique Landscapes (BULs), but it is recommended that whenever
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of a Relict Lineage and Monotypic Family of Passerine Birds
    Discovery of a relict lineage and monotypic family of passerine birds Based on a comprehensive molecular dataset of passerines birds we identified a branch with a single species, the Spotted Wren-babbler Spelaeornis formosus. We suggest that this represents a relict lineage, which we propose should be placed in its own family, Elachuridae. The scientific name Elachura formosa should be used. We analysed of one of the most comprehensive datasets to date of the largest passerine bird clade, Passerida, which comprises c. 36% of the World’s c. 10,500 bird species. We identified 10 primary branches in the tree. One of these primary branches was made up of a single species, the Spotted Wren-Babbler Spelaeornis formosus, which is a small Wren-like bird that occurs in mountains from the eastern Himalayas to southeast China. This species apparently represents an old branch in the large passerine tree, without any close living relatives. There have surely been other relatives on this branch, which have gone extinct. The fact that it resembles wren-babblers and wrens in appearance is either due to pure chance or to convergent evolution, which may result in similar appearances in unrelated species that live in similar environments. We proposed the new family name Elachuridae for this single species. We also suggested that the scientific name Elachura formosa should be used, and the English name be changed to Elachura, to highlight its distinctness. Timaliidae (56) Pellorneidae (69) Leiothrichidae (133) Zosteropidae (128) Sylviidae (70) Pnoepygidae
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Patterns of Size and Shape of the Nasal Gland Depression in Phalacrocoracidae
    PHYLOGENETIC PATTERNS OF SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE NASAL GLAND DEPRESSION IN PHALACROCORACIDAE DOUGLAS SIEGEL-CAUSEY Museumof NaturalHistory and Department of Systematicsand Ecology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2454 USA ABSTRACT.--Nasalglands in Pelecaniformesare situatedwithin the orbit in closelyfitting depressions.Generally, the depressionsare bilobedand small,but in Phalacrocoracidaethey are more diversein shapeand size. Cormorants(Phalacrocoracinae) have small depressions typical of the order; shags(Leucocarboninae) have large, single-lobeddepressions that extend almost the entire length of the frontal. In all PhalacrocoracidaeI examined, shape of the nasalgland depressiondid not vary betweenfreshwater and marine populations.A general linear model detectedstrongly significant effectsof speciesidentity and gender on size of the gland depression.The effectof habitat on size was complexand was detectedonly as a higher-ordereffect. Age had no effecton size or shapeof the nasalgland depression.I believe that habitat and diet are proximateeffects. The ultimate factorthat determinessize and shape of the nasalgland within Phalacrocoracidaeis phylogenetichistory. Received 28 February1989, accepted1 August1989. THE FIRSTinvestigations of the nasal glands mon (e.g.Technau 1936, Zaks and Sokolova1961, of water birds indicated that theseglands were Thomson and Morley 1966), and only a few more developed in species living in marine studies have focused on the cranial structure habitats than in species living in freshwater associatedwith the nasal gland (Marpies 1932; habitats (Heinroth and Heinroth 1927, Marpies Bock 1958, 1963; Staaland 1967; Watson and Di- 1932). Schildmacher (1932), Technau (1936), and voky 1971; Lavery 1972). othersshowed that the degree of development Unlike most other birds, Pelecaniformes have among specieswas associatedwith habitat. Lat- nasal glands situated in depressionsfound in er experimental studies (reviewed by Holmes the anteromedialroof of the orbit (Siegel-Cau- and Phillips 1985) established the role of the sey 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Sep 2018 Lists of Victims and Hosts of the Parasitic
    version: 21 Sep 2018 Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic cowbirds (Molothrus). Peter E. Lowther, Field Museum Brood parasitism is an awkward term to describe an interaction between two species in which, as in predator-prey relationships, one species gains at the expense of the other. Brood parasites "prey" upon parental care. Victimized species usually have reduced breeding success, partly because of the additional cost of caring for alien eggs and young, and partly because of the behavior of brood parasites (both adults and young) which may directly and adversely affect the survival of the victim's own eggs or young. About 1% of all bird species, among 7 families, are brood parasites. The 5 species of brood parasitic “cowbirds” are currently all treated as members of the genus Molothrus. Host selection is an active process. Not all species co-occurring with brood parasites are equally likely to be selected nor are they of equal quality as hosts. Rather, to varying degrees, brood parasites are specialized for certain categories of hosts. Brood parasites may rely on a single host species to rear their young or may distribute their eggs among many species, seemingly without regard to any characteristics of potential hosts. Lists of species are not the best means to describe interactions between a brood parasitic species and its hosts. Such lists do not necessarily reflect the taxonomy used by the brood parasites themselves nor do they accurately reflect the complex interactions within bird communities (see Ortega 1998: 183-184). Host lists do, however, offer some insight into the process of host selection and do emphasize the wide variety of features than can impact on host selection.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update of Wallacels Zoogeographic Regions of the World
    REPORTS To examine the temporal profile of ChC produc- specification of a distinct, and probably the last, 3. G. A. Ascoli et al., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 557 (2008). tion and their correlation to laminar deployment, cohort in this lineage—the ChCs. 4. J. Szentágothai, M. A. Arbib, Neurosci. Res. Program Bull. 12, 305 (1974). we injected a single pulse of BrdU into pregnant A recent study demonstrated that progeni- CreER 5. P. Somogyi, Brain Res. 136, 345 (1977). Nkx2.1 ;Ai9 females at successive days be- tors below the ventral wall of the lateral ventricle 6. L. Sussel, O. Marin, S. Kimura, J. L. Rubenstein, tween E15 and P1 to label mitotic progenitors, (i.e., VGZ) of human infants give rise to a medial Development 126, 3359 (1999). each paired with a pulse of tamoxifen at E17 to migratory stream destined to the ventral mPFC 7. S. J. Butt et al., Neuron 59, 722 (2008). + 18 8. H. Taniguchi et al., Neuron 71, 995 (2011). label NKX2.1 cells (Fig. 3A). We first quanti- ( ). Despite species differences in the develop- 9. L. Madisen et al., Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133 (2010). fied the fraction of L2 ChCs (identified by mor- mental timing of corticogenesis, this study and 10. J. Szabadics et al., Science 311, 233 (2006). + phology) in mPFC that were also BrdU+. Although our findings raise the possibility that the NKX2.1 11. A. Woodruff, Q. Xu, S. A. Anderson, R. Yuste, Front. there was ChC production by E15, consistent progenitors in VGZ and their extended neurogenesis Neural Circuits 3, 15 (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist: Birds of Rice Creek
    Troglodytidae – Wrens Parulidae – Warblers Emberizidae – Sparrows Fringillidae – Finches � House Wren � Ovenbird � Eastern Towhee � Pine Grosbeak � Winter Wren � Worm-eating Warbler � American Tree Sparrow � Purple Finch � Sedge Wren � Louisiana Waterthrush � Chipping Sparrow � House Finch � Marsh Wren � Northern Waterthrush � Clay-colored Sparrow � Red Crossbill SUNY Oswego � � � Carolina Wren � Golden-winged Warbler Field Sparrow White-winged Crossbill Birds of Central New York � � Vesper Sparrow � Common Redpoll Blue-winged Warbler — CheckList — Polioptilidae – Gnatcatchers � Black-and-white Warbler � Savannah Sparrow � Hoary Redpoll � Blue-gray Gnatcatcher � Prothonotary Warbler � Grasshopper Sparrow � Pine Siskin Locality _____________________________________ � � Henslow’s Sparrow � American Goldfinch Regulidae – Kinglets Tennessee Warbler Date ____________ Time __________ Total ________ � Fox Sparrow � Evening Grosbeak � Golden-crowned Kinglet � Orange-crowned Warbler Temp. ___________ Sky ___________ Wind________ � Song Sparrow � Ruby-crowned Kinglet � Nashville Warbler � � Lincoln’s Sparrow Passeridae – Observer ____________________________________ Connecticut Warbler European Sparrows � Swamp Sparrow Turdidae – Thrushes � Mourning Warbler � House Sparrow � Eastern Bluebird � Common Yellowthroat � White-throated Sparrow ANSERIFORMES � Greater Scaup � Anatidae – � Veery � Hooded Warbler White-crowned Sparrow � Lesser Scaup � Dark-eyed Junco Swans, Geese, Ducks � King Eider � Gray-cheeked Thrush � American Redstart sf. Anserinae
    [Show full text]
  • Plumage and Sexual Maturation in the Great Frigatebird Fregata Minor in the Galapagos Islands
    Valle et al.: The Great Frigatebird in the Galapagos Islands 51 PLUMAGE AND SEXUAL MATURATION IN THE GREAT FRIGATEBIRD FREGATA MINOR IN THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS CARLOS A. VALLE1, TJITTE DE VRIES2 & CECILIA HERNÁNDEZ2 1Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Campus Cumbayá, Jardines del Este y Avenida Interoceánica (Círculo de Cumbayá), PO Box 17–12–841, Quito, Ecuador ([email protected]) 2Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, PO Box 17–01–2184, Quito, Ecuador Received 6 September 2005, accepted 12 August 2006 SUMMARY VALLE, C.A., DE VRIES, T. & HERNÁNDEZ, C. 2006. Plumage and sexual maturation in the Great Frigatebird Fregata minor in the Galapagos Islands. Marine Ornithology 34: 51–59. The adaptive significance of distinctive immature plumages and protracted sexual and plumage maturation in birds remains controversial. This study aimed to establish the pattern of plumage maturation and the age at first breeding in the Great Frigatebird Fregata minor in the Galapagos Islands. We found that Great Frigatebirds attain full adult plumage at eight to nine years for females and 10 to 11 years for males and that they rarely attempted to breed before acquiring full adult plumage. The younger males succeeded only at attracting a mate, and males and females both bred at the age of nine years when their plumage was nearly completely adult. Although sexual maturity was reached as early as nine years, strong competition for nest-sites may further delay first reproduction. We discuss our findings in light of the several hypotheses for explaining delayed plumage maturation in birds, concluding that slow sexual and plumage maturation in the Great Frigatebird, and perhaps among all frigatebirds, may result from moult energetic constraints during the subadult stage.
    [Show full text]