DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EVALUATION REPORT Watamu Marine Protected Area Location: Kenyan Coast, Western Indian Ocean Blue Park Status: Nominated (2020), Evaluated (2021) MPAtlas.org ID: 68812840 Manager(s): Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) MAPS 2 1. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 1.1 Biodiversity Value 4 1.2 Implementation 8 2. AWARD STATUS CRITERIA 2.1 Regulations 11 2.2 Design, Management, and Compliance 12 3. SYSTEM PRIORITIES 3.1 Ecosystem Representation 17 3.2 Ecological Spatial Connectivity 18 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Evidence of MPA Effects 20 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Additional species of 20 conservation concern MAPS Figure 1: Watamu Marine Protected Area includes Watamu Marine National Park (dark blue, indicating that it is fully protected), Watamu Marine National Reserve (light blue, indicating that it is highly protected), and half of Malindi-Watamu Marine National Reserve (light blue lined; it is also highly protected). Watamu Marine National Park is a no-take marine refuge which provides coral reefs and a variety of marine species with total protection from extractive exploitation. The adjacent Watamu Marine National Reserve protects the estuary known as Mida Creek and allows limited fishing. The Malindi-Watamu Marine National Reserve, located on the coastal side of Watamu Marine National Park, also allows limited fishing. See Section 2.1 for more information about the regulations of each zone. (Source: Kenya Wildlife Service, 2015) - 2 - Figure 2: Watamu National Marine Park (pink) sees high visitor use. The Watamu Marine Reserve (yellow) is a Medium Use Zone. The portion of the Malindi-Watamu Reserve within Watamu MPA (olive green) is a Low Use Zone, with respect to recreational activities. (Source: Kenya Wildlife Service, 2015) Figure 3: Watamu Marine National Park (the fully protected zone of Watamu MPA) includes littoral zones (black), coral (purple), tidepools (light orange), subtidal rocky areas (orange), beaches (light yellow), sandy bottom areas (yellow), intertidal seagrass meadows (light green), subtidal seagrass meadows (dark green) and mixed areas (green). (Source: Kenya Wildlife Service, 2015) - 3 - Eligibility Criteria: Biodiversity Value (must satisfy at least one) 1.1.1 Includes rare, unique, or representative ecosystems. WMPA protects several marine ecosystems that support high biodiversity, including mangroves, coral reefs, rocky intertidal areas and subtidal reefs, beaches, and seagrass meadows.1 These ecosystems are representative of those found in the coastal areas of the Western Indian Ocean.2 Mangroves: Found within the Watamu National Reserve in Mida Creek, mangrove stands are an important sea bird haven as well as protection for numerous species of fish. Mida Creek is one of the most productive mangrove ecosystems on earth, with seven out of nine East African mangrove species found there. The total mangrove area is estimated at 17.5 km2 and is dominated by Rhizophora-Ceriops. The average stocking rate of mangroves in Mida Creek is 351,100 stems/km2, with a volume of 9,270 m3/km2. In addition to protecting the coastline against natural hazards, they also trap sediments and help build up the coastline against forces of erosion.3 Coral Reefs: In Watamu Marine National Park, coral is mostly found along the seaward facing slope of channels running through the lagoon. Patch reefs, 10-50 m long, are dominated by slow growing Porites heads separated by areas of sand and seagrass. Watamu Marine Reserve protects a fringing reef that occurs near-shore and continues outward up to 1 km off-shore.4 Coral cover is low in the Watamu Marine National Park, with only 4% live coral cover in areas near the lagoon to a maximum of 12% north of Coral Gardens and near Whale Island. Coral reefs are the least common habitat in the lagoon, covering just over .085 km2 of seabed. Watamu Marine National Park provides total protection from extractive exploitation for corals; the coral reef areas are the most popular tourist attraction in the Watamu Marine National Park.5 The scleractinian coral, Anomastraea irregularis, is a rare coral found in rock pools or at the base of fringing reefs within the Park. It is listed as vulnerable in the IUCN red-list and is provided total protection by Watamu National Marine Park.6,7,8 1 Kenya Wildlife Service (2015) Watamu Marine Protected Area Management Plan (2016-2026), p. 11. 2 Kenya Wildlife Service (2015) Watamu Marine Protected Area Management Plan (2016-2026), p. 15. 3 Kenya Wildlife Service (2015) Watamu Marine Protected Area Management Plan (2016-2026), p. 11. 4 Kaunda-Arara, B., & Rose, G. A. (2004). Effects of marine reef National Parks on fishery CPUE in coastal Kenya. Biological Conservation 118:1-13. 5 Cowburn, B., et al. (2018) The Habitats and Biodiversity of Watamu Marine National Park: Evaluating Our Knowledge of One of East Africa's Oldest Marine Protected Areas. Atoll Research Bulletin 618. 6 Kenya Wildlife Service (2015) Watamu Marine Protected Area Management Plan (2016-2026), p. 13. 7 Sheppard, C., et al. (2008) Anomastraea irregularis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008. Retrieved August 2020 from https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T133484A3767662.en 8 Cowburn, B., et al. (2018) The Habitats and Biodiversity of Watamu Marine National Park: Evaluating Our Knowledge of One of East Africa's Oldest Marine Protected Areas. Atoll Research Bulletin 618. - 4 - Seagrass: Subtidal seagrass is the most extensive habitat in the Watamu Marine National Park, covering approximately 40% of the shallow lagoon bed.9,10 Intertidal seagrass habitats have rich invertebrate fauna, as well as many sandy pools where juvenile fish and intertidal specialists live.11 1.1.2 Includes area of high species richness or endemism within the context of the biogeographic region. The northern coast of Kenya, where Watamu MPA is located, is rich with diverse bird life, fish, turtles, marine mammals, and unique coral gardens.12 The Watamu Marine Protected Area (WMPA) is located along the longest fringing reef on the east coast of Africa. Most of the area is dominated by coral reef and seagrass habitats, though Mida Creek has extensive mangrove forests.13 Coastal East Africa has the highest richness of seagrass species in the world with 12 species; 11 of these are found in Watamu, including the vulnerable IUCN red listed Zostera capensis.14,15 WMPA serves as an ecological refuge to an abundance of plant, coral, and other marine species due to its high local biodiversity inside its 10 km2 no-take Marine National Park area. For instance, humpback whales, dolphins, sharks, and rays seek refuge in this protected area. These top predators are important to ecosystems as they serve as indicators of the health of marine environments by identifying exposure and effects of pollutants over temporal, spatial, and trophic scales. Additionally, this area provides refuge to sixty-five species of aquatic birds, which reach numbers of over 6,000 individuals.16 1.1.3 Includes demonstrated historic or predicted ecological refugia. No known evidence. 1.1.4 Includes area important for threatened species (including those identified by the IUCN Red List or national legislation), keystone species, or foundational species. Important areas include migration pathways and breeding, nursery, feeding, or assembly areas. WMPA serves as a critical protection habitat for species that utilize the park for breeding, feeding, and nursery grounds and includes several species which are globally threatened. 9 Kenya Wildlife Service (2015) Watamu Marine Protected Area Management Plan (2016-2026), p. 15. 10 Kaunda-Arara, B., & Rose, G. A. (2004). Effects of marine reef National Parks on fishery CPUE in coastal Kenya. Biological Conservation 118:1-13. 11 Kenya Wildlife Service (2015) Watamu Marine Protected Area Management Plan (2016-2026), p. 15. 12 Kenya Wildlife Service (2015) Watamu Marine National ParK and Reserve. Retrieved 17 August 2020 from http://www.kws.go.ke/content/watamu-marine-national-park-reserve 13 Muthiga, N.A. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of management of the Malindi–Watamu marine protected area complex in Kenya. Ocean & Coastal Management 52:417-423. 14 Kenya Wildlife Service (2015) Watamu Marine Protected Area Management Plan (2016-2026), p. 15. 15 Short, F.T. et al., (2010). Zostera capensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010. Retrieved August 2020 from https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T173370A7001305.en 16 Kenya Wildlife Service (2015) Watamu Marine Protected Area Management Plan (2016-2026), p. 7. - 5 - In seagrass and coral reef areas, sea turtles are widely distributed along the Kenyan coastline. The government of Kenya has shown commitment to the conservation of sea turtles, an important flagship species in the marine environment. Sea turtles play important ecological roles as they directly and indirectly affect other marine species in the food web. Kenya’s maritime zones are designated as marine mammal and turtle Sanctuary where these species are afforded total protection where they can nest and forage.17 There are five species of sea turtles within the Kenyan waters: the green turtle (Chelonia mydas, EN/IUCN18), hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricate, CR/IUCN19), loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta, CR/IUCN20), olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea, VU/IUCN21) and the leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea, VU/IUCN22). All five of these sea turtle species are listed by the IUCN under Appendix 1 in CITES.23 A closed zone has been designated with the primary objective of giving maximum
Recommended publications
  • The Kenya Wildlife Service at Its Best

    The Kenya Wildlife Service at Its Best

    ihe Kenya wild Life service Iru the 2±st century: "Protective cqlobally significant Areas and Resoutrces The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 29 number 1 • 2012 Origins Founded in 1980, the George Wright Society is organized for the pur­ poses of promoting the application of knowledge, fostering communica­ tion, improving resource management, and providing information to improve public understanding and appreciation of the basic purposes of natural and cultural parks and equivalent reserves. The Society is dedicat­ ed to the protection, preservation, and management of cultural and natu­ ral parks and reserves through research and education. Mission The George Wright Society advances the scientific and heritage values of parks and protected areas. The Society promotes professional research and resource stewardship across natural and cultural disciplines, provides avenues of communication, and encourages public policies that embrace these values. Our Goal The Society strives to be the premier organization connecting people, places, knowledge, and ideas to foster excellence in natural and cultural resource management, research, protection, and interpretation in parks and equivalent reserves. Board of Directors BRENT A. MITCHELL, PRESIDENT • Ipswich, Massachusetts MOLLY N. ROSS, VICE PRESIDENT • Arlington, Virginia DAVIDJ. PARSONS, SECRETARY • Florence, Montana GARY E. DAVIS, TREASURER • Thousand Oaks, California BRAD BARR • Woods Hole, Massachusetts NATHALIE GAGNON • Ottawa, Ontario BARRETT KENNEDY • Baton Rouge, Louisiana FRANKJ. PRIZNAR • Gaithersburg, Maryland JANW. VAN WAGTEN'DONK • El Portal, California JOHN WAITHAKA • Ottawa, Ontario LYNN WILSON • Cobble Hill, British Columbia GRADUATE STUDENT LIAISON TO THE BOARD CARENA J. VAN RIPER • College Station, Texas Executive Office DAVID HARMON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EMILY DEKKER-FIALA, CONFERENCE COORDINATOR P.
  • The 2016 SWFSC Billfish Newsletter

    The 2016 SWFSC Billfish Newsletter

    The SouthwestSWFSC Fisheries 2016 Billfish Science Newsletter Center’s 2016 Billfish Newsletter Global Tagging Map El Niño fishing conditions Catch-Photo-Release mobile phone application IGFA Great Marlin Race and satellite tagging 1 Top Anglers and Captains of 2015 SWFSC 2016 Billfish Newsletter Table of Contents Special Foreword …………………………………………………………….. 3 An Inside Look ……………………………………………………………..… 4 Prologue …………………………………………………………………….… 5 Introduction ……………………………………………………………..….… 5 The International Billfish Angler Survey ………………………………....... 7 Pacific blue marlin 9 Striped marlin 10 Indo-Pacific sailfish 11 Black marlin 13 Shortbill spearfish 13 Broadbill swordfish 14 The Billfish Tagging Program ……………………………………………..... 14 The Hawaiian Islands 16 2015 Tagging-at-a-Glance Map 17 Baja California and Guerrero, Mexico 18 Southern California 18 Western Pacific 18 Top Anglers and Captains Acknowledgements ……………………………. 19 Top Tagging Anglers 19 Top Tagging Captains 21 Tag Recoveries ……………………………………………………………….. 21 Science in Action: “The IGFA Great Marlin Race and Marlin Tagging” 23 Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………....... 25 Angler Photos ……………………………………………………………..….. 26 Congratulations to Captain Teddy Hoogs of the Bwana for winning this year’s cover photo contest! Teddy photographed this spectacular marlin off the coast of Hawaii. Fish on! 2 Special Forward James Wraith, director of the SWFSC Cooperative Billfish Tagging Program since 2007, recently left the SWFSC to move back to Australia. James was an integral part of the Highly Migratory Species (HMS) program. In addition to day-to-day work, James planned and organized the research cruises for HMS at the SWFSC and was involved in tagging thresher, blue, and mako sharks in the Southern California Bight for many years. We are sad to see him go but are excited for his future opportunities and thankful for his many contributions to the program over the last 10 years.
  • Striped Marlin (Kajikia Audax)

    Striped Marlin (Kajikia Audax)

    I & I NSW WILD FISHERIES RESEARCH PROGRAM Striped Marlin (Kajikia audax) EXPLOITATION STATUS UNDEFINED Status is yet to be determined but will be consistent with the assessment of the south-west Pacific stock by the Scientific Committee of the Central and Western Pacific Fisheries Commission. SCIENTIFIC NAME STANDARD NAME COMMENT Kajikia audax striped marlin Previously known as Tetrapturus audax. Kajikia audax Image © I & I NSW Background lengths greater than 250cm (lower jaw-to-fork Striped marlin (Kajikia audax) is a highly length) and can attain a maximum weight of migratory pelagic species distributed about 240 kg. Females mature between 1.5 and throughout warm-temperate to tropical 2.5 years of age whilst males mature between waters of the Indian and Pacific Oceans.T he 1 and 2 years of age. Striped marlin are stock structure of striped marlin is uncertain multiple batch spawners with females shedding although there are thought to be separate eggs every 1-2 days over 4-41 events per stocks in the south-west, north-west, east and spawning season. An average sized female of south-central regions of the Pacific Ocean, as about 100 kg is able to produce up to about indicated by genetic research, tagging studies 120 million eggs annually. and the locations of identified spawning Striped marlin spend most of their time in grounds. The south-west Pacific Ocean (SWPO) surface waters above the thermocline, making stock of striped marlin spawn predominately them vulnerable to surface fisheries.T hey are during November and December each year caught mostly by commercial longline and in waters warmer than 24°C between 15-30°S recreational fisheries throughout their range.
  • Kenya Soe Ch4 A

    Kenya Soe Ch4 A

    PART 2 STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT 61 CHAPTER BIODIVERSITY4 Introduction The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) defi nes biodiversity as Kenya’s rich biodiversity Lead Authors ‘the variability among living organisms from all sources including, can be attributed to a number Ali A. Ali and Monday S. Businge among others, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and of factors, including a long Contributing Authors S. M. Mutune, Jane Kibwage, Ivy Achieng, the ecological complexes of which they are part [and] includes diversity evolutionary history, variable Godfrey Mwangi, David Ongare, Fred Baraza, within species, between species and of ecosystems.’ Biodiversity climatic conditions, and diverse Teresa Muthui, Lawrence M. Ndiga, Nick Mugi therefore comprises genetic and species diversity of animals and plants habitat types and ecosystems. Reviewer as well as ecosystem diversity. Kenya is endowed with an enormous The major biodiversity Nathan Gichuki diversity of ecosystems and wildlife species which live in the terrestrial, concentration sites fall within aquatic and aerial environment. These biological resources are the existing protected areas fundamental to national prosperity as a source of food, medicines, network (national parks, reserves and sanctuaries) which are mostly energy, shelter, employment and foreign exchange. For instance, managed by the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS). However, over 70 percent agricultural productivity and development are dependent on the of the national biodiversity occurs outside the protected areas. availability of a wide variety of plant and animal genetic resources and In spite of its immense biotic capital, Kenya experiences severe on the existence of functional ecological systems, especially those that ecological and socio-economic problems.
  • Conservation and Management Strategy for the Elephant in Kenya 2012-2021

    Conservation and Management Strategy for the Elephant in Kenya 2012-2021

    Conservation and Management Strategy for the Elephant in Kenya 2012-2021 Compiled by: Moses Litoroh, Patrick Omondi, Richard Kock and Rajan Amin Plate 4. Winds 2 Family crossing the Ewaso Ng’iro River, Samburu National Reserve - Lucy King, Save the Elephants ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, we thank the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) Director, Julius Kipng’etich and KWS Board of Trustees for approving this as a priority activity amongst the core business of KWS. Conservation and We also sincerely thank Keith Lindsay, Winnie Kiiru and Noah Sitati for preparing Management Strategy the background information and facilitating the eleven consultative for the Elephant stakeholder-workshops that were held across the country. This ensured the in Kenya views of as many stakeholders as possible were accommodated into this strategy document. Special thanks to all the stakeholders of the final strategy 2012-2021 development workshop, held at Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, which © Kenya Wildlife Service included representatives from United Republic of Tanzania; Uganda Government and the Government of Southern Sudan that finally formulated this National Elephant Management and Conservation Strategy. Our sincere gratitude also to the following individuals for reviewing the first draft : Munira Anyonge Bashir, Julian Blanc, Holly Dublin, Francis Gakuya, Ian Douglas-Hamilton, Ben Kavu, Juliet King, Lucy King, Margaret Kinnaird, Ben Okita, Lamin Seboko, Noah Sitati, Diane Skinner, Richard Vigne and David Western. Frontcover: We are greatly indebted to the following institutions for funding the formulation of this strategy : Born Free Foundation; CITES MIKE Programme; Darwin Initiative Plate 1. African Elephant. Samantha Roberts, Zoological / CETRAD; KWS; People’s Trust for Endangered Species; Tusk Trust; United States Society of London Fish and Wildlife Service; World Wildlife Fund (EARPO) and Zoological Society of London (ZSL).
  • Sustainable Tourism Development in the Masai Mara National Reserve, Kenya, East Africa

    Sustainable Tourism Development in the Masai Mara National Reserve, Kenya, East Africa

    Sustainable Tourism IV 319 Sustainable tourism development in the Masai Mara National Reserve, Kenya, East Africa J. Onchwati, H. Sommerville & N. Brockway Hotel and Tourism Management Institute, Switzerland Abstract The Masai Mara Game Reserve is Kenya’s finest wildlife reserve, one of the world’s top tourist attractions and vital to Kenya’s economy. Recently, concerns have been expressed about the sustainability of tourism given the threats of depletion of indigenous animals, degradation of the landscape and impact on the native Masai Mara tribespeople. The challenge now is to create a sustainable situation that protects the interests of all stakeholders. This paper explores the views of four key stakeholder groups: the Masai people; conservationists including the Kenya Wildlife Service and the Masai Mara Game Reserve management; local tourism and game lodge operators; and government departments. Interviews were carried out with representatives of each stakeholder group to gain insight into their needs from tourism and whether these needs are currently met; suggestions for short- and long-term tourism developments; and the economic implications of tourism in the Masai Mara. Interview data were supplemented by an extensive period of observation. The findings indicate that the growth of tourism and the lack of resources to manage tourism are leading to persistent tensions between stakeholders and presenting long-term threats to the tourism industry. Overpopulation, changes in land use, poaching, deforestation, land degradation, conflicts due to unequal sharing of revenue, poor infrastructure and insecurity all contribute to these tensions. All stakeholders agreed that urgent action is required and lessons must be learned in order to sustain tourism and ensure the Masai Mara is preserved for future generations.
  • Holothuriidae 1165

    Holothuriidae 1165

    click for previous page Order Aspidochirotida - Holothuriidae 1165 Order Aspidochirotida - Holothuriidae HOLOTHURIIDAE iagnostic characters: Body dome-shaped in cross-section, with trivium (or sole) usually flattened Dand dorsal bivium convex and covered with papillae. Gonads forming a single tuft appended to the left dorsal mesentery. Tentacular ampullae present, long, and slender. Cuvierian organs present or absent. Dominant spicules in form of tables, buttons (simple or modified), and rods (excluding C-and S-shaped rods). Key to the genera and subgenera of Holothuriidae occurring in the area (after Clark and Rowe, 1971) 1a. Body wall very thick; podia and papillae short, more or less regularly arranged on bivium and trivium; spicules in form of rods, ovules, rosettes, but never as tables or buttons ......→ 2 1b. Body wall thin to thick; podia irregularly arranged on the bivium and scattered papillae on the trivium; spicules in various forms, with tables and/or buttons present ...(Holothuria) → 4 2a. Tentacles 20 to 30; podia ventral, irregularly arranged on the interradii or more regularly on the radii; 5 calcified anal teeth around anus; spicules in form of spinose rods and rosettes ...........................................Actinopyga 2b. Tentacles 20 to 25; podia ventral, usually irregularly arranged, rarely on the radii; no calcified anal teeth around anus, occasionally 5 groups of papillae; spicules in form of spinose and/or branched rods and rosettes ............................→ 3 3a. Podia on bivium arranged in 3 rows; spicules comprise rocket-shaped forms ....Pearsonothuria 3b. Podia on bivium not arranged in 3 rows; spicules not comprising rocket-shaped forms . Bohadschia 4a. Spicules in form of well-developed tables, rods and perforated plates, never as buttons .....→ 5 4b.
  • IATTC-94-01 the Tuna Fishery, Stocks, and Ecosystem in the Eastern

    IATTC-94-01 the Tuna Fishery, Stocks, and Ecosystem in the Eastern

    INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION 94TH MEETING Bilbao, Spain 22-26 July 2019 DOCUMENT IATTC-94-01 REPORT ON THE TUNA FISHERY, STOCKS, AND ECOSYSTEM IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN IN 2018 A. The fishery for tunas and billfishes in the eastern Pacific Ocean ....................................................... 3 B. Yellowfin tuna ................................................................................................................................... 50 C. Skipjack tuna ..................................................................................................................................... 58 D. Bigeye tuna ........................................................................................................................................ 64 E. Pacific bluefin tuna ............................................................................................................................ 72 F. Albacore tuna .................................................................................................................................... 76 G. Swordfish ........................................................................................................................................... 82 H. Blue marlin ........................................................................................................................................ 85 I. Striped marlin .................................................................................................................................... 86 J. Sailfish
  • Aquaculture and Marine Protected Areas: Exploring Potential Opportunities and Synergies

    Aquaculture and Marine Protected Areas: Exploring Potential Opportunities and Synergies

    Aquaculture and Marine Protected Areas: Exploring Potential Opportunities and Synergies To meet the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Aichi Target 11 on marine biodiversity protection, Aichi Target 6 on sustainable fisheries by 2020, as well as the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2 on food security and SDG 14 on oceans, by 2030, there is an urgent need to reconcile nature conservation and sustainable development. It is also widely recognised that aquaculture significantly contributes to sustainable development in coastal communities and plays a vital role in ensuring food security, poverty alleviation, and economic resilience. In the framework of integrated management, the time has therefore come to identify the potential opportunities and synergies that can enable aquaculture and conservation to work together more effectively. CONTENT Understanding the various types of aquaculture and their potentialities ……………………………………… 3 The types of MPAs and matrix of interactions showing aquaculture & sustainability principles …… 7 Understanding aquaculture and MPA interactions …… 8 Towards MPAs and aquaculture compatibility and sustainability ……………………………………………10 Background In order to feed the world's growing human population, attention will need to increasingly focus on where the protein needs of the world will be supplied from. While capture fisheries have now reached a plateau of production, marine aquaculture of fish, shellfish and algae has been steadily increasing over the past decades and has become a valid option to make up the protein shortfall. However, one of the major constraints for the aquaculture production sector is the availability of, and access to space. In many coastal areas, competition with other marine activities is already high, mainly because the bulk of marine aquaculture is located close to the shore.
  • The Impact of Watamu Marine National Park on Marine Biodiversity & Habitats

    The Impact of Watamu Marine National Park on Marine Biodiversity & Habitats

    The Impact of Watamu Marine National Park on Marine Biodiversity & Habitats A Conservation Research Project by A Rocha Kenya Robert Sluka, Benjamin Cowburn, Colin Jackson A Rocha Kenya, Watamu Ornithology Section, Zoology Dept, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi — A Rocha Kenya Occasional Research Report #24 — August 2012 Impact of Watamu Marine National Park on Marine Biodiversity – A Rocha Kenya & KWS, 2012 Executive Summary The original project vision was “to study the impacts of Watamu Marine National Park (WMNP) on marine biodiversity, habitats, and animal behaviour through high level research and facilitate capacity building for East African marine research and volunteer-led marine conservation at Mwamba Field Study Centre, A Rocha Kenya, Watamu.” From the original proposal the main research goal was to collect baseline data that would provide a basis for identifying key research questions and areas of conservation concern within the National Park environment. During the 2011/2012 field season we were able to conduct three studies identified as important by Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) who are the government institution managing the marine park: biodiversity of WMNP, Tourism Impacts on Coral Gardens, and Coral Recruitment studies. During these studies our taxonomic identification capacity grew to include fish and coral species found in WMNP and have focussed our attention on IUCN red list priority species for pursuing further data collection. In order to present at conferences and publish results in peer reviewed journals we are using data to produce two papers currently focusing on the results of the tourist study. We are working in a partnership with CORDIO to use our biodiversity data in another paper to be submitted in 2013.
  • Kenya Marine Mammal Network

    Kenya Marine Mammal Network

    Kenya Marine Mammal Network NEWSLETTER ISSUE 2 JANUARY 2013 IN THIS ISSUE: Welcome to the second edition of the KMMN Newsletter! Sightings April- 2 September 2012 KMMN Photos 3 Synchronized 4 Humpback whale breaching off Shimoni, South coast, Kenya Whale Watch- ing Day 2012 In this second edition of the newsletter we will continue to provide the first consistent data on occurrence and abundance of marine mammals along the Kenyan coast collected by sport fishing vessels, diving clubs and NGOs. This project will help to define ar- Dolphin watch- 4 ing training eas of “High Importance” for marine mammals, improving our local under- courses standing of these species on a broader temporal scale. At the same time, this data is extremely important for the marine mammal conservation and management strate- Convention on 5 gies in Kenya and it may be used as a baseline for further studies. Biological Di- versity Re- gional Work- shop KMMN on the 6 media Watamu’s top 7 Humpback Bottlenose dolphin interacting with an octopus in Kisite Mpunguti Marine Protected Area Whale Report- ers The Kenya Marine Mammal Network project proponent GVI (Global Vision International), KMMN collabo- 8 partnering with Watamu Marine Association (WMA) and Kenya Association of Sea Anglers rators (KASA) and supported by Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) and Kenya Marine Fisheries Re- search Institute (KMFRI) wants to wish all its whale reporters a Happy New Year 2013, filled with many adventures & great encounters! The Kenya Marine Mammal Network P A G E 2 Sightings April—September 2012 From April and September 2012, 144 sightings (Fig.
  • Age Estimation of Billfishes (Kajikia Spp.) Using Fin Spine Cross-Sections: the Need for an International Code of Practice

    Age Estimation of Billfishes (Kajikia Spp.) Using Fin Spine Cross-Sections: the Need for an International Code of Practice

    Aquat. Living Resour. 23, 13–23 (2010) Aquatic c EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD 2009 DOI: 10.1051/alr/2009045 Living www.alr-journal.org Resources Age estimation of billfishes (Kajikia spp.) using fin spine cross-sections: the need for an international code of practice R. Keller Kopf1,a, Katherine Drew2,b and Robert L. Humphreys Jr.3 1 Charles Sturt University, School of Environmental Sciences, PO Box 789, Albury NSW 2640, Australia 2 University of Miami RSMAS, Division of Marine Biology and Fisheries, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami, FL 33149, USA 3 NOAA Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, Aiea Heights Research Facility, 99-193 Aiea Heights Drive, Suite 417, Aiea, Hawaii 96701, USA Received 26 February 2009; Accepted 2 May 2009 Abstract – Fin spine ageing is the most common technique used to estimate age and growth parameters of large pelagic billfishes from the families Istiophoridae and Xiphiidae. The most suitable methods for processing and inter- preting these calcified structures for age estimation have not been clearly defined. Methodological differences between unvalidated ageing studies are of particular concern for highly migratory species because multiple researchers in dif- ferent regions of the world may conduct age estimates on the same species or stock. This review provides a critical overview of the methods used in previous fin spine ageing studies on billfishes and provides recommendations towards the development of a standardized protocol for estimating the age of striped marlin, Kajikia audax and white marlin, Ka- jikia albida. Three on-going fin spine ageing studies from Australia, Hawaii, and Florida are used to illustrate some of the considerations and difficulties encountered when developing an ageing protocol for highly migratory fish species.