The Important Role of the Two French Astronomers J.-N. Delisle and J.-J. Lalande in the Choice of Observing Places During the Transits of Venus in 1761 and 1769

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Important Role of the Two French Astronomers J.-N. Delisle and J.-J. Lalande in the Choice of Observing Places During the Transits of Venus in 1761 and 1769 MEETING VENUS C. Sterken, P. P. Aspaas (Eds.) The Journal of Astronomical Data 19, 1, 2013 The Important Role of the Two French Astronomers J.-N. Delisle and J.-J. Lalande in the Choice of Observing Places during the Transits of Venus in 1761 and 1769 Simone Dumont1 and Monique Gros2 1Observatoire de Paris, 61 Avenue de l’Observatoire, 75014, Paris, France 2Observatoire de Paris, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris – Universit´e Pierre et Marie Curie, 98 bis Boulevard Arago, 75014, Paris, France Abstract. Joseph-Nicolas Delisle, as a member of the Acad´emie Royale des Sci- ences of Paris and professor at the Coll`ege Royal de France, went to England in 1724 to visit Newton and Halley. The latter suggested observations of the transits of Mercury and of Venus in order to obtain the solar parallax. Delisle was also in- terested in the Mercury transits. After a stay of 22 years in Saint Petersburg, on his return to Paris, he distributed avertissements (information bulletins) encouraging all astronomers to observe the same phenomena, like the solar eclipse of 1748. Later, in 1760, Delisle presented an Adresse to the King and to the Acad´emie in which he detailed his method to observe the 1761 transit of Venus. This was accompanied by a mappemonde showing the best places for observations. Copies of the text, together with 200 maps, were sent to his numerous correspondents in France and abroad. Following the advanced age and finally death of Delisle, his assistant and successor Joseph-J´erˆome Lalande presented a m´emoire related to the 1769 transit of Venus and an improved map of the best observing places. We detail the role of Delisle and Lalande in the preparation of the international collaboration related to these two transits. 1. Joseph-Nicolas Delisle and Joseph-J´erˆome Lalande, two activist- astronomers? Joseph Nicolas Delisle (or de L’Isle) (1688–1768) was born in Paris; being very gifted in Astronomy, he was admitted in 1714 as the student of Giacomo Filippo Maraldi (1669–1729) at the Acad´emie Royale des Sciences. Two years later he was appointed a member of the Academy, first as an adjunct (1716), and then as an associated member (1719, see Fig. 1). He was known as Delisle le cadet since his older brother, Guillaume (1675–1726) was also a member of the Academy. In 1719 he succeeded the late Philippe de La Hire (1640–1718) as professor of mathematics at the Coll`ege Royal. In 1717 Tsar Peter the Great (1672–1725) came to France and visited the Royal Observatory where he met Delisle. In 1721 the Tsar invited Delisle to come and teach astronomy and geography in Russia. After his death, his wife and successor Tsarina Catherine I (1684–1727) maintained his invitation. From 1726 to 1747 Delisle developed the teaching and practice of both astronomy and geography at the Russian Academy of Sciences in Saint Petersburg. He equipped an observatory and began the measurement of a meridian. His younger brother Louis (1687–1741), known as Louis de la Croy`ere, also a member of the Paris Academy, came with him to stay in Russia. Louis de la Croy`ere took part in the exploration of the Northern part of the Pacific Ocean by the Russian navy. 131 132 Dumont & Gros Figure 1. Old Joseph Delisle. Engraving by Westermeyer (1765–1834). Biblioth`eque de l’Observatoire de Paris. On his return to Paris in 1747, Delisle was appointed to the chair of mathematics at the Coll`ege Royal again; he was appointed astronomer of the French royal navy – astronome de la Marine – and set up an observatory in the Hˆotel de Cluny (nowadays the Museum of the Middle Ages in Paris). During his stay in Russia Delisle had created a large network of correspondents, over Europe and among the Jesuit missionaries in China and India. He had supplied numerous astronomers with Avertissements (information bulletins) encouraging them to observe the same phenomena: the first one concerned the solar eclipse of July 25, 1748, the second was an exhortation from Nicolas-Louis de La Caille (1713–1762), asking astronomers to observe the Moon, Mars and Venus in conjunction with him being stationed at the Cape of Good Hope (1751–1752). Joseph J´erˆome Lefran¸cois (1732–1807), born in Bourg-en-Bresse on July 11, after studying in Jesuit schools first in Bourg and then in Lyon, arrived in Paris in the autumn of 1748 to study law. His name was then changed to Lefran¸cois de Lalande, which soon became Delalande or Lalande when he reached fame (Fig. 2). By chance he got accommodation with a procureur (royal prosecutor) at the Hˆotel de Cluny where he was happy to have a look at the observatory and to meet Delisle. In Bourg, while he was a young boy, he had admired the comet of 1744; later, when he was a pupil at the college of Lyon, father B´eraud (1702–1774) had shown him the solar eclipse of July 25, 1748. So, while studying law to satisfy his parents, Lalande had the opportunity to observe and learn about astronomical facts with Delisle; the following year he studied with Pierre Charles Lemonnier (1715–1799), also professor at the Coll`ege Royal; in 1751, Lemonnier provided him with an astronomical mission to Berlin to observe the Moon in conjunction with La Caille, who was then, as already mentioned, at the Cape of Good Hope. On his return to Paris with some good observations, Lalande was admitted to the Academy (1753). From his own observations of the Moon and those sent to the Academy by La Caille, Lalande deduced the parallax of the Moon. Later, in 1758, The Role of Delisle and Lalande in Choosing Observing Places 133 Figure 2. Lalande, 1783, work by Gatteaux (1751–1832). Biblioth`eque de l’Observatoire de Paris. following a request of Alexis Clairaut (1713–1765), with the help of Mme Lepaute (1723–1788), he calculated the perturbations induced by Saturn and Jupiter on the orbit of the comet now known as Halley’s comet, and, as a consequence, he obtained a more precise time of perihelion passage; thanks to his successful results, Lalande gained the reputation as an able astronomer, both as an observer and as a calculator. In 1760, 72-year old Delisle appointed his young friend Lalande his “survivancier” in his teaching at the Coll`ege Royal. Lalande thus lectured here, as Delisle did before him, and, when Delisle passed away in 1768, he became the successor to his chair of mathematics that became, in 1774, a chair in astronomy. Lalande stayed at the Coll`ege de France until his death. Like Delisle, Lalande developed a large network of correspondents and exerted a marked influence on the international community of astronomers. 2. Delisle and the transits of planets over the solar disc Assiduously observing, Delisle was much interested in important astronomical events, like the transit of Mercury over the solar disc of 9 November 1723 and the total solar eclipse of 22 May 1724, both of which he observed at the Royal Observatory in Paris. This same year, to prepare for his mission to Russia, Delisle went to London with a member of the Acad´emie Fran¸caise. There, he visited Isaac Newton (1643–1727), who gave him his portrait, and the Astronomer Royal Edmond Halley (1656–1742). In 1677, Halley had proposed a method to evaluate the solar parallax. First he proposed to use the observations of the Mercury transits over the Sun’s disc, then the Venus transits predicted to occur later, in 1761 and 1769. Halley developed his method while, on the Island of Saint-Helena, he attended and observed a transit of Mercury; his method consisted in recording the local time of both the second and third contacts of the transit from two observing places with different latitudes. This information was supposed to infer the distance Earth–Mercury, and, by using the 134 Dumont & Gros third law of Kepler (1571–1630), the distance Earth–Sun. However, in the case of Mercury, the precision proved to be insufficient; for this reason, Halley recommended to observe the 1761 transit of Venus over the solar disc from two specific places: the Hudson Bay and some site in India. Delisle, who had already observed a transit of Mercury, is likely to have discussed this subject with Halley during his visit. Be that as it may, when Delisle returned to Paris, he was a Newtonian natural philosophy enthusiast and still a strong supporter of observations of the Mercury transits, the next transits of Venus being in a so remote future, i.e., more than forty years ahead! Delisle later, while in Russia, embarked upon an expedition to Siberia to observe the Mercury transit of May 2, 1740, from Beresov on the banks of the River Ob near Tobolsk, – after asking some of his correspondents to observe the Moon in con- junction with him. Delisle proceeded through Russia as quickly as possible to reach his destination on the Ob. Unfortunately, the transit day was cloudy, and his cor- respondent Johann Wilhelm Wagner (1681–1745), wrote to him that it had rained in Berlin during the whole transit. By the end of August/beginning of September Delisle returned to Saint Petersburg; he soon sent advice to astronomers in vari- ous countries including a letter to Jacques Cassini (1677–1756) for improving the observation of the next transit of Mercury, predicted to occur on November 4, 1743. Back in Paris in 1747, Delisle suggested a method to obtain the solar parallax that differed from Halley’s; one needed to record the exact time of just one single inner contact of the planet with the Sun from two different observing places, the latitude and longitude of which must be precisely known.
Recommended publications
  • Amédée Ernest Barthémy MOUCHEZ
    Astronomía Latinoamericana Amédée Ernest Barthémy MOUCHEZ Un almirante que se las trajo en la región. Edgardo Ronald Minniti Morgan Premio H.C. Pollock 2005 Miembro de la Red Mundial de Escritores en Español Integrante del Grupo de Investigación en Enseñanza, Difusión, e Historia de la Astronomía, del Observatorio de Córdoba-UNC – historiadelaastronomía.wordpress.com – HistoLIADA – Lidea Amédée Ernest Barthémy Mouchez. Unos de los casos más notables de la astronomía decimonónica, que afectó profundamente la evolución de esa ciencia en Latinoamérica y en el mundo, fue el devenido almirante francés Amédée Ernest Barthémy Mouchez. Español, de padres franceses, nació en Madrid el 24 de Agosto de 1821. Adoptó de muy joven la carrera marítima, ingresando en los cuerpos de la marina francesa, cuya nacionalidad adoptó, destacándose por su dedicación e inteligencia. Se especializó en geodesia astronómica aplicada a la hidrografía naval; actividad que le permitió alcanzar con honores el grado de Capitán de Navío en el año 1868. Durante varios años recorrió las costas de América, desde Panamá hasta el Río de la Plata, efectuando relevamientos cartográficos de trascendente importancia. 1846 Carta Esférica de una parte de la Bahía de Panamá que comprende el puerto de Sta. Bárbara- detalle - Web Como teniente de navío Mouchez permaneció cuatro años con el Aviso de su mando “Bisson” en las aguas del Plata y sus afluentes, destacando – por ejemplo en sus informes – haber notado una gran baja del nivel de las aguas en Octubre de 1856 y una crecida extraordinaria en Mayo de 1858, las cuales, observadas en la escala de mareas, que tenía puesta en el puerto de Paraná, dieron por diferencia de niveles la notable cifra de 5m 24cm, conforme es destacado en el “Manual de la navegación del Rí , según los documentos mas fidedignos, nacionales y extranjeros”, elaborado por los señores Lobo y Riudavets.
    [Show full text]
  • Transferencia De Conocimientos Hidrográficos Y Astronómicos Entre Francia Y Argentina. La Construcción De Paisajes Marítimos
    Transferencia de conocimientos hidrográficos y astronómicos entre Francia y Argentina. La construcción de paisajes marítimos y portuarios Miguel de Marco (h), Nathan Godet, Helen Mair Rawsthorne To cite this version: Miguel de Marco (h), Nathan Godet, Helen Mair Rawsthorne. Transferencia de conocimientos hidro- gráficos y astronómicos entre Francia y Argentina. La construcción de paisajes marítimos y portuarios. 2020. hal-02975592 HAL Id: hal-02975592 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02975592 Preprint submitted on 22 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Transferencia de conocimientos hidrográficos y astronómicos entre Francia y Argentina. La construcción de paisajes marítimos y portuarios. De Marco (h), Miguel Ángel*, Godet, Nathan y Rawsthorne, Helen*** * Instituto de Estudios Históricos, Económicos Sociales e Internacionales del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina, [email protected] ** Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Histoire, Histoire de l’art et Musicologie (Criham, EA 4270), Université de Poitiers, et le Centre François Viète (EA 1161), Université de Bretagne Occidentale, [email protected] *** Centre François Viète (EA 1161), Université de Bretagne Occidentale, [email protected] Resumen El Servicio Hidrográfica y Oceanográfica de la Marina de Francia (Shom), con sede en la ciudad de Brest, desde hace 300 años atesora uno de los repositorios documentales más importantes en su temática.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETI'er September-October 1987 PRESIDENT's REPORT Although I Am Writing This Report in the Dog Days of Summer, Most of Us Wi
    Volume 17, Number 5 NEWSLETI'ER September-October 1987 PRESIDENT'S REPORT Although I am writing this report in the dog days of summer, most of us will be back to the rigors of our respective positions by the time this Newsletter appears. For many mathematicians, fall carries the additional responsibility of preparing grant proposals (I understand there are some very organized individuals who do this in the summer). I urge our women and minority members to bear in mind the many grants available through the ROW (Research Opportunities for Women) and Minority programs at the National Science Foundation. A thorough description of these opportunities is given in the article by Louise Raphael in this Newsletter (May-June 1987). One of the most attractive of the NSF offerings is the Visiting Professorships for Women program. I have spoken to many women who have received this grant or applied for it, and was surprised to learn that there is a wide variety of opinion regarding its efficacy. If you have had experience with this grant or have an opinion about the concept, I would appreciate hearing your views. While on the subject of the NSF, I would like to take this opportunity to wish Dr. Kenneth Gross, who has been the Program Director for Modern Analysis for the past two years, best of luck as he leaves NSF for the University of Vermont. Dr. Gross has been a strong supporter of women and minority mathematicians while at NSF, and many women have commented on the encouragement he has given them. * Linda Keen and I have written to the Notices regarding the lack of women speakers at the symposium on the mathematical heritage of Hermann Weyl at Duke University (see August Notices, Letters to the Editor).
    [Show full text]
  • MACHIELS, André Travailleur Bénévole À L'observatoire De Paris À Partir De 1930, Il Collabora Avec Mineur Dès 1932
    MACHIELS, André Travailleur bénévole à l'Observatoire de Paris à partir de 1930, il collabora avec Mineur dès 1932. Il fut conduit, en rentrant de captivité, à cesser son activité astronomique. - Sur la répartition des aplatissements des nébuleuses elliptiques (Bulletin astronomique 6 (2), 317, 1930) ; - Classification des nébuleuses extragalactiques par leurs formes. Amas de Coma–Virgo (Bulletin astronomique 6 (2), 405, 1930) ; - Sur la distribution de la matière absorbante galactique (avec Mineur, CRAS 195, 1234,1932) ; - A propos d'une explication des vitesses d'éloignement des nébuleuses (CRAS 197, 1025, 1933) ; - Classification, formes et orientations des nébuleuses extragalactiques (Bulletin astronomique 9 (2), 471, 1934) ; - Remarque au sujet des effets qui résultent, d'après H.J. Gramatzki, d'une variation de la vitesse de la lumière avec le temps (ZfA 9, 329, 1935) - A propos d'un critérium de la réalité des vitesses de nébuleuses (CRAS 204, 1708, 1937). MACRET, J.D. J.D. Macret a publié : Découverte du vrai principe astronomique, translation du soleil (l’auteur, Paris, 1879). (Blavier, 1982) MACRIS, Constantin De nationalité grecque, il vint en 1947 à l'observatoire de Meudon pour commencer une thèse sur la granulation solaire avec Lyot. Il a probablement (?) soutenu sa thèse en 1953 à Paris : Recherches sur la granulation photosphérique (Annales d'astrophysique 16, 19, 1953). Il était en 1991 professeur à l'université d'Athènes. (Olivieri, 1993) MAERLEYN Il fut calculateur (ou agent administratif ?) à l'Observatoire de Paris de juillet 1855 à septembre 1859. (AN:F17.3733) MAES, Louis Joseph (1815-1898) Louis Joseph Maës est né à Paris le 28 mai 1815.
    [Show full text]
  • The Napoleon Series
    The Napoleon Series Maps and Mapmakers of the Napoleonic Wars Part II: French Mapmakers – the Cassinis and Maraldis By: Richard Tennant The Cassini Dynasty Giovanni Domenico Cassini (8 June 1625 – 14 September 1712)1 He was an Italian mathematician, astronomer, astrologer and engineer. Cassini was born in Perinaldo, near Imperia, at that time in the County of Nice, part of the Duchy of Savoy. Cassini is known for his work in the fields of astronomy and engineering. Cassini discovered four satellites of the planet Saturn and noted the division of the rings of Saturn; the Cassini Division was named after him. In 1669 Cassini moved to France and through a grant from Louis XIV of France helped to set up the Paris Observatory, which opened in 1671; Cassini would remain the director of the observatory for the rest of his career until his death in 1712. For the remaining forty-one years of his life Cassini served as astronomer/astrologer to Louis XIV ("The Sun King"); serving the expected dual role yet focusing the overwhelming majority of his time on astronomy rather than the astrology he had studied so much in his youth. During this time, Cassini's method of determining longitude was used to measure the size of France accurately for the first time. The country turned out to be considerably smaller than expected, and the king quipped that Cassini had taken more of his kingdom from him than he had won in all his wars. Cassini had two sons; the younger, Jacques Cassini, succeeded him as astronomer and geodesist under the name of Cassini II.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffusion Et Mutation Des Méthodes De L'astronomie Nautique, 1749-1905
    Diffusion et mutation des méthodes de l’astronomie nautique, 1749-1905 Guy Boistel To cite this version: Guy Boistel. Diffusion et mutation des méthodes de l’astronomie nautique, 1749-1905 : Accompagné du mémoire d’habilitation, “ Une école pratique d’astronomie au service des marins et des explorateurs : l’observatoire de la Marine et du Bureau des longitudes au parc Montsouris, 1875-1914 ”. Histoire, Philosophie et Sociologie des sciences. Université de Nantes, 2010. tel-01341041 HAL Id: tel-01341041 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01341041 Submitted on 3 Jul 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES Habilitation à diriger des recherches Diffusion et mutation des méthodes de l’astronomie nautique, 1749-1905 Accompagné du mémoire d’habilitation , « Une école pratique d’astronomie au service des marins et des explorateurs : l’observatoire de la Marine et du Bureau des longitudes au parc Montsouris, 1875-1914 » par Guy BOISTEL 2010 VOLUME 1 Parcours de recherche, Curriculum Vitæ et publications représentatives des travaux de recherches Dossier scientifique constitué en vue de l’obtention du diplôme d’H.D.R. vendredi 12 mars 2010 Habilitation à diriger des recherches Vol .
    [Show full text]
  • Tales from the Nineteenth-Century Archives
    Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Studies 12 Lorraine Daston: The Accidental Trace and the Science of the Future: Tales from the Nineteenth- Century Archives In: Julia Bärnighausen, Costanza Caraffa, Stefanie Klamm, Franka Schneider, and Petra Wodtke (eds.): Photo-Objects : On the Materiality of Photographs and Photo Archives Online version at http://mprl-series.mpg.de/studies/12/ ISBN 978-3-945561-39-3 First published 2019 by Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Printed and distributed by: PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin http://www.book-on-demand.de/shop/15803 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Chapter 4 The Accidental Trace and the Science of the Future: Tales from the Nineteenth­Century Archives Lorraine Daston Introduction: glass and paper forever This glass photographic plate of a small square of the night sky, taken on a clear winter’s night in Potsdam in 1894, is one of the around two million such astrophotographic plates stored in observatories all over the world (Lankford 1984, 29) (see Fig. 1). There are ap­ proximately 600,000 plates at the Harvard College Observatory, 20,000 at the Bologna Uni­ versity Observatory, 80,000 at the Odessa Astronomical Observatory, to give just a few examples (Hudec 1999). The designation of these collections as “archives” is mostly ret­ rospective, but the glass plate pictured here was destined from the outset to be part of an archive: the vast astrophotographic survey of the sky as seen from the earth known as the Carte du Ciel.
    [Show full text]
  • Cahiers François Viete
    CAHIERS FRANÇOIS VIETE Série I – N°11-12 2006 L’événement astronomique du siècle ? Histoire sociale des passages de Vénus, 1874-1882 DAVID AUBIN - L'événement astronomique du siècle ? Une histoire sociale des passages de Vénus, 1874-1882 JIMENA CANALES - Sensational differences: the case of the transit of Venus STÉPHANE LE GARS - Image et mesure : deux cultures aux origines de l'astrophysique française JESSICA RATCLIFF - Models, metaphors, and the transit of Venus at Victorian Greenwich RICHARD STALEY - Conspiracies of Proof and Diversity of Judgement in Astronomy and Physics: On Physicists' Attempts to Time Light's Wings and Solve Astronomy's Noblest Problem LAETITIA MAISON - L'expédition à Nouméa : l'occasion d'une réflexion sur l'astronomie française GUY BOISTEL - Des bras de Vénus aux fauteuils de l'Académie, ou comment le passage de Vénus permit à Ernest Mouchez de devenir le premier marin directeur de l'Observatoire de Paris MARTINA SCHIAVON - Astronomie de terrain entre Académie des sciences et Armée SIMON WERRETT - Transits and transitions: astronomy, topography, and politics in Russian expeditions to view the transit of Venus in 1874 DAVID AUBIN ET COLETTE LE LAY - Bibliographie générale Centre François Viète Épistémologie, histoire des sciences et des techniques Université de Nantes Achevé d'imprimer sur les presses de l'imprimerie centrale de l'université de Nantes, juillet 2017 Mise en ligne en juin 2018 sur www.cfv.univ-nantes.fr SOMMAIRE • DAVID AUBIN ......................................................................................................... 3 L'événement astronomique du siècle ? Une histoire sociale des passages de Vénus, 1874-1882 • JIMENA CANALES ................................................................................................. 15 Sensational differences: the case of the transit of Venus • STÉPHANE LE GARS ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IAU Information Bulletin No. 104
    CONTENTS IAU Information Bulletin No. 104 Preface ..................................................................................................................... 4 1. EVENTS & DEADLINES ............................................................ 5 2. REMINISCENCES OF PAST IAU PRESIDENTS ............... 7 2.1. Adriaan Blaauw, 18th IAU President, 1976 - 1979 ............................ 7 2.2. Jorge Sahade, 21st IAU President, 1985 - 1988 .............................. 10 2.3. Yoshihide Kozai, 22nd IAU President, 1988 - 1991 ....................... 12 2.4. Lodewijk Woltjer, 24th President, 1994 - 1997 ................................. 14 2.5. Robert P. Kraft, 25th IAU President, 1997 - 2000 .......................... 15 2.6. Franco Pacini, 26th President, 2000 - 2003 ...................................... 16 3. IAU EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 3.1. Officers’ Meeting 2009-1, Paris, France, 6 April 2009 .................... 18 3.2. 85th Executive Committee Meeting, Paris, France, 7 - 8 April 2009 18 4. THE EC WORKING GROUP ON THE INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF ASTRONOMY 2009 4.1. Status report ......................................................................................... 20 5. IAU GENERAL ASSEMBLIES 5.1. IAU XXVII General Assembly, 3-14 August 2009, Rio de .......... 24 Janeiro, Brazil 5.1.1. Inaugural Ceremony, First Session, Second Session and ................. 24 Closing Ceremony 5.1.2. Proposal for modification of Statutes and Bye-Laws ....................... 27 5.1.2.1 Proposal for modification of Statutes ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • L'annuaire Du Bureau Des Longitudes (1795
    Collection du Bureau des longitudes Volume 8 Colette Le Lay L’Annuaire du Bureau des longitudes (1795 - 1932) Collection du Bureau des longitudes - Volume 8 Colette Le Lay Bureau des longitudes © Bureau des longitudes, 2021 ISBN : 978-2-491688-05-9 ISSN : 2724-8372 Préface C’est avec grand plaisir que le Bureau des longitudes accueille dans ses éditions l’ouvrage de Colette Le Lay consacré à l’Annuaire du Bureau des longitudes. L’Annuaire est la publication du Bureau destinée aux institutions nationales, aux administrations1 et au grand public, couvrant, selon les époques, des domaines plus étendus que l’astronomie, comme la géographie, la démographie ou la physique par exemple. Sa diffusion est par nature plus large que celle des éphémérides et des Annales, ouvrages spécialisés destinés aux professionnels de l’astronomie ou de la navigation. De fait l’Annuaire est sans aucun doute la publication du Bureau la plus connue du public et sa parution régulière repose sur les bases légales de la fondation de l’institution lui enjoignant de présenter chaque année au Corps Législatif un Annuaire propre à régler ceux de toute la République. L’ouvrage de Mme Le Lay couvre l’histoire de l’Annuaire sur la période allant de la création du Bureau des longitudes en 1795 jusqu’à 1932. L’auteure nous décrit les évolutions de son contenu au cours du temps, les acteurs qui le réalisent et ses utilisateurs. On y verra que les changements ont été grands entre l’opuscule hésitant de ses débuts, qui se limitait à quelques renseignements astronomiques sur les levers-couchers du Soleil et de la Lune, les éclipses et déjà les poids et mesures, et les imposants volumes du XIXe siècle avec des tables de toutes natures et des notices scientifiques étoffées.
    [Show full text]
  • Notices Biographiques
    Notices biographiques Ce document, réalisé par Jean-Claude Pecker, comporte de courtes notices d'abord sur les savants ayant fréquenté l'Académie de Mersenne et celles de Montmor et Thévenot, puis sur les Membres et Correspondants français de l'Académie des sciences présentées par ordre chronologique de leur entrée à l'Académie des sciences. Il se termine par des notices sur les astronomes français importants, presque contemporains, qui auraient pu être élus à l'Académie des sciences. N.B. : Jean-Claude Pecker remercie M. Philippe Véron, pour l'avoir autorisé à se servir de son Dictionnaire des astronomes français pour la rédaction des notices sur les astronomes ayant été actifs après 1850 et avant 1950. Il tient à préciser qu'il s'est également inspiré de notices existantes ; il assume cette responsabilité auprès des nombreux auteurs, le plus souvent anonymes, dont il a utilisé les écrits. Autour de l'Académie de Mersenne Nicolas Claude FABRI (1580 - 1637), du village de Peyresq - autrement dit Nicolas PEIRESC - est né en 1580, l'année de la première édition des Essais de Montaigne. Ce juriste, ce politique, était aussi un humaniste convaincu. Il entretint des relations épistolaires suivies avec de nombreux intellectuels, Malherbe, Gassendi, Mersenne... Il a été en correspondance avec Galilée qui lui a confié une lunette. Peiresc observa le ciel de sa Provence natale, et fit d'importantes découvertes : celle de la nébuleuse d'Orion par exemple. A la veille de sa mort, il avait entrepris une cartographie de la Lune, jamais aboutie. Jean-Baptiste MORIN (1583 - 1656) né à Villefranche-sur-Saône, étudia à Aix, puis à Avignon.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 7.1: Observatoire De Paris (Photo: Gudrun Wolfschmidt)
    Figure 7.1: Observatoire de Paris (Photo: Gudrun Wolfschmidt) 76 7. Astronomy and Astrophysics at the Observatoire de Paris in the Belle Epoque Suzanne Débarbat (Paris, France) Abstract field of celestial mechanics in the world including uses for space research. The Belle Epoque considered at the Paris Observatory lies Such was the man to whom Admiral Ernest Mouchez from about two decades before 1900 up to the beginning of had to succeed. At the death of Le Verrier, in 1877, World War I. Four directors were at its head during those Mouchez was a man of experience, fiftysix years old years: Admiral Ernest Barthélémy Mouchez (1821–1892) being an officer from the French Navy, who had made from 1878 up to 1892, François-Félix Tisserand (1845–1896) hydrographic campaigns in South America, Asia, Africa. during only four years between 1892 and 1896, Maurice Mouchez was also an astronomical observer of the 1874 Lœwy (1833–1907) from 1897 to 1907 and Benjamin Baillaud transit of Venus, in view of a new determination of the (1848–1934) from 1908 up to 1926, a long mandate which solar parallax. He was just called to be contre-amiral in ended seven years after the end of World War I. All of them 1878 when asked to be director of the Paris Observatory have marked the Observatory and its activities in different the same year. fields. 7.2 Admiral Mouchez’s Program and Realizations 7.1 Admiral Mouchez, a Difficult Succession at the Head of the In 1847, when attending a meeting of the British Asso- ciation for Advancement of Science in Oxford, Le Ver- Observatory rier had a lodging close to F.
    [Show full text]