Warmer Days and Longer Evenings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IF P 25 MIIBHIIN I MARSH IHIIIIBESTERSIIIIIE
Reprinted from: Gloucestershire Society for Industrial Archaeology Journal for 1977-78 pages 25-29 INDUSTRIAL ABIZIIIEIILIIGY (IF p 25 MIIBHIIN I MARSH IHIIIIBESTERSIIIIIE BIIY STIPLETUN © ANCIENT ROADS An ancient way, associated with the Jurassic Way, entered the county at the Four Shire Stone (SP 231321). It came from the Rollright Stones in Oxfordshire and followed the slight ridge of the watershed between the Thames and the Severn just north of Moreton in Marsh. Its course from the Four Shire Stone is probably marked by the short stretch of county boundary across Uolford Heath to Lemington Lane. The subsequent line is diffi- cult to determine; it may have struck north west across Batsford Heath to Dorn or, perhaps more likely, may have continued along Lemington Lane around the eastern boundary of the Fire Service Technical College, so skirting the marshy area of Lemington and Batsford Heaths. In the latter case, it would have continued across the Moreton in Marsh-Todenham road and along the narrow lane past Lower Lemington which crosses the Ah29 road (the Fosse Way) to Dorn. From there it would have continued to follow approximately the line of this road up past Batsford and along the ridge above to the course followed by the Ahh, thence following the Cotswold Edge southwards. The Salt Hay from Droitwich through Campden followed the same route through Batsford and Dorn to the Four Shire Stone, where it divided into two routes. One followed the same line as the previous way through Kitebrook and past Salterls Hell Farm near Little Compton to the Ridgeway near the Rollright Stones. -
Chastleton House Was Closed Today,The Four Shire Stone
Chastleton House was closed today Secret Cottage took a Cotswolds tour to Chastleton House today, but unfortunately it was closed for the filming of Wolf Hall and Bringing up the Bodies. Filming started yesterday and will continue until August the 6th. As an alternative, we took our tourists to The Rollright Stones which were nearby and our guests thoroughly enjoyed themselves. However, we wanted to tell you something about the fabulous Chastleton House. Chastleton House is a fine Jacobean country house built between 1607 and 1612 by a Welsh wool merchant called Walter Jones. The house is built from beautiful local Cotswold stone and is Grade I listed. It was built on the site of an older house by Robert Catesby who masterminded the gunpowder plot! There are many unique features to Chastleton House; one of them being the longevity of the property within one family. In fact, until the National Trust took over the property in 1991, it had remained in the same family for around 400 years. Unlike many tourist attractions, the National Trust have kept this house completely unspoilt – they are conserving it, rather than restoring it. They don’t even have a shop or tea room; giving you the opportunity to truly step back in time. It’s almost like being in a living museum with a large number of the rooms open to the public that are still beautiful and untouched and have escaped the intrusion of being bought into the 21st century. A trip to Chastleton House brings history to life. This house has charm; there is no pretence with making walls perfect or fixing minor problems; expect to find gaps in the walls, cracks in the ceiling, uneven floors, dust and cobwebs in all their glory. -
11 September 1992 Judgment
11 SEPTEMBER 1992 JUDGMENT LAND, ISLAh D AND MARITIME FRONTIER DISPUTE (EL SALVADClR/HONDURAS: NICARAGUA intervening) DIFFÉREND FRONTALIER TERRESTRE, INSULAIRE ET MARITIME (EL SALVADOR/HONDURAS; NICARAGUA (intervenant)) 11 SEPTEMBRE 1992 ARRÊT INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 1992 YEAR 1992 Il September General List No. 75 Il September 1992 CASE CONCERNING THE LAND, ISLAND AND MARITIME FRONTIER DISPUTE (EL SALVADOR/HONDURAS: NICARAGUA inte~ening) Case brought by Special Agreement - Dispute involving six sectors of interna- tional land frontier, legal situation of islands and of maritime spaces inside and outside the Gulfof Fonseca. Land boundaries - Applicability and meaning of principle of uti possidetis juris - Relevance of certain "titles" - Link between disputed sectors and adjoin- ing agreed sectors of boundary - Use of topographical features in boundary-mak- ing - Special Agreement and 1980 General Treaty of Peace between the Parties - Provision in Treaty for account to be taken by Chamber of "evidenceand argu- ments of a legal, historical, human or any other kind, brought before it by the Par- ties and admitted under international law" - Significance to be attributed to Spanish colonial titulos ejidales - Relevance ofpost-independence land titles - Role of effectivités - Demographic considerations and inequalities of natural resources - Considerations of "effective control" of territory - Relationship between titles and effectivités - Critical date. First sector of land boundary - Interpretation of Spanish colonial land titles - Effect of grant by Spanish colonial authorities to community in one province of rights over land situate in another - Whether account may be taken ofproposals or concessions made in negotiations - Whether acquiescence capable of modifying uti possidetis juris situation - Interpretation of colonial documents - Claims based solely on effectivités - Relevance of post-independence Iand titles - Sig- nificance of topographically suitable boundary line agreed ad referendum. -
Continental Shelf (Designation of Areas) Order 2013
Bulletin No. 84 Law of the Sea Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea Office of Legal Affairs United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea Office of Legal Affairs Law of the Sea Bulletin No. 84 United Nations New York, 2017 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expres- sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The texts of treaties and national legislation contained in the Bulletin are reproduced as submitted to the Secretariat. Furthermore, publication in the Bulletin of information concerning developments relating to the law of the sea emanating from actions and decisions taken by States does not imply recognition by the United Nations of the validity of the actions and decisions in question. IF ANY MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THE BULLETIN IS REPRODUCED IN PART OR IN WHOLE, DUE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SHOULD BE GIVEN. United Nations Publication ISBN 978-92-1-133827-0 Copyright © United Nations, 2017 All rights reserved Printed at the United Nations, New York Contents Page I. UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA Status of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, of the Agreement relating to the Imple- mentation of Part XI of the Convention and of the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the Convention relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks 1. -
REPUBLIC of GUYANA V. REPUBLIC of SURINAME
ARBITRATION UNDER ANNEX VII OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA REPUBLIC OF GUYANA v. REPUBLIC OF SURINAME MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA VOLUME I 22 FEBRUARY 2005 Memorial of Guyana MEMORIAL OF GUYANA PART I 2 Memorial of Guyana TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Page CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................1 I. Reasons for the Institution of Proceedings Against Suriname..............................1 II. Guyana’s Approach to the Presentation of the Case.............................................3 III. Structure of the Memorial.....................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2 - GEOGRAPHY AND EARLY HISTORY ...................................................7 I. Geography.............................................................................................................7 II. Early History.......................................................................................................10 CHAPTER 3 - EFFORTS OF THE COLONIAL POWERS TO SETTLE THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN BRITISH GUIANA AND SURINAME: 1929 TO 1966........13 I. The Fixing of the Northern Land Boundary Terminus between British Guiana and Suriname: 1936................................................................................14 II. The First Attempt To Fix a Maritime Boundary in the Territorial Sea: 1936 ....18 III. The Draft Treaty To Settle the Entire Boundary: 1939 ......................................20 IV. Unsuccessful Post-World -
National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation
NPS Fa<m !CHIOO·C IJin .:~n United States Department of the Interior National Park Service .. "')" National Register of Historic Places - !~ ......=· Multiple Property Documentation Form N.!.TIONAL REGISTER This form is for use in documentmg multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts See instructions in Guidelines tor Completmg Nst1onsl Reg1ster Forms (National Reg1ster Bulletin 16). Complete each 1tem by markmg "x" in the appropnate box or by entenng the requested informat1on. For additional space use contmuat1on sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entnes. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Boundary Markers of the original District of Columbia B. Associated Historic Contexts Establishment of the Original Boundaries of the District of Columbia C. Geographical Data The boundary markers of the original District of Columbia located in the Commonwealth of Virginia are within the jurisdictions of the counties of Arlington and Fairfax and the cities of Alexandria and Falls Church. They are spaced at more or less regular intervals of one mile along a line drawn between the UTM coordinates 18132276014295280 and 18131157014306900 and between the UTM coordinates 18131157014306900 and 18I315080j4310370. _See continuation sheet 0. Certification As the designated authority under the National Hrstonc Preservatron Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that th1s documentation form meets the National Regrster documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submiss1on meets the procedural and profess1onal requir ents set fonh m 6 FA Pan 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. /7 ~ lf7a Date r, Virgi~ia De~artment of Historic ReEources State or Federal agency ana bureau I, hereby, certify that th1s mulliple property documentation form has been approved by the Nat1onal Reg1ster as a bas1s for e luating related properties tcr lis!lng .... -
SEPARATE OPINION of JUDGE TORRES BERNARDEZ 1 Have
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TORRES BERNARDEZ 1 have voted for the operative part of the Judgment, except for sub- paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 (i) and subparagraph 5 of operative para- graph 43 1 and subparagraph 2 of operative paragraph 432. Except with respect to the attribution of sovereignty over the island of Meanguerita, my negative votes concern questions relating to the interpretation of Article 2, paragraph 2, of the Special Agreement. The considerations and observations included in the present opinion have a threefold purpose. They intend to convey the essentials of my posi- tion on: (1) questions with respect to which, to my regret, 1 was unable to join the majority vote; (2) questions on which 1 have some reservations notwithstanding my positive vote on the decision concerned as a whole; and (3) main developments in the reasoning which 1 do not share com- pletely or which would have deserved, in my opinion, further elaboration. After a brief introduction concerning the case as a whole, my considera- tions and observations are presented under the main headings of the three major aspects of the case, namely the "land boundary dispute", the "island dispute" and the "maritime dispute". The table of contents thus presents the following synopsis : Paragraphs INTRODUCTION.THE CASE 1-7 1. THELAND BOUNDARY DISPUTE 8-55 A. General questions 8-37 (a) The 1821 utipossidetisjurisprinciple as applicable law 8-15 (b) The utipossidetis juris principle and the rule of evidence in Article 26 of the General Treaty of Peace 16-20 (c) The utipossidetisjuris principle and the effectivités 2 1-27 (d) The uti possidetis juris principle and the rirulos ejidales invoked by the Parties 28-37 B. -
Combined CCI Copy.Cwk
T-M TRANSPORTATION-MARKINGS DATABASE: COMPOSITE CATEGORIES CLASSIFICATION & INDEX Brian Clearman Mount Angel Abbey 2012 Saint Benedict, Oregon TRANSPORTATION-MARKINGS DATABASE: COMPOSITE CATEGORIES CLASSIFICATION & INDEX TRANSPORTATION-MARKINGS: A STUDY IN COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPH SERIES Alternate Series Title: An Inter-modal Study of Safety Aids Alternate T-M Titles: Transport [ation] Mark [ings]/Transport Marks/Waymarks/ Transportation Control Devices T-M Foundations, 5the edition, 2008 (Part A, Volume I, First Studies in T-M (2nd ed., 1991; 3rd ed., 1999, 4th ed., 2005) A First Study in T-M: The US, 2nd ed., 1992 (Part B, Vol. I) International Marine Aids to Navigation, 3rd edition, 2010 (Parts C & D, Vol. I) (2nd ed., 1988) [Unified lst Edition of Parts A-D, 1981, University of America Press] International Traffic Control Devices, 2nd ed., 2004 (Part E, Vol. II, Further Studies in T-M) (lst ed., 1984) International Railway Signals, 1991 (Part F, Vol. II). International Aero Navigation Aids, 1994 (Part G, Vol. II). T-M General Classification, 3rd edition, 2010 (Part II, Vol. II) (2nd ed., 2003; 3rd ed., 1995). Transportation-Markings Database: Marine, 2nd ed., 2007 (Part Ii, Vol. III, Additional Studies in T-M), (1st ed., 1997) TCD, 2nd. ed., 2008 (Part Iii, Vol. III), (lst ed., 1998) Railway, 2nd ed., 2009 (Part Iiii), (lst ed., 2000) Aero, 2nd ed., 2009 (Part Iiv) (lst ed., 2001) Composite Categories Classification & Index, 2nd ed., 2012 (Part Iv, Vol. III) (lst ed., 2006) Transportation-Markings: A Historical Survey, 1750-2000, 2002 (Part J, Vol. IV, Final Studies in T-M) Transportation-Markings: An Integrative Systems Perspective: Communication, Information, Semiotics, 2011 (Part K, Vol. -
Definitive Map of Public Rights of Way for Oxfordshire Relevant Date: 21St February 2006 Colour SHEET SP 23 SW
Definitive Map of Public Rights of Way for Oxfordshire Relevant Date: 21st February 2006 Colour SHEET SP 23 SW 20 21 22 23 24 25 0006 1200 2400 5500 3800 0004 0800 2500 3400 4600 8400 2900 8500 5100 0006 6300 7800 0004 0004 2000 7700 35 A 429 35 0890 9377 0078 0078 1476 4074 0074 7975 8673 Brook Hill Lower Farm 3373 Barn Lower Farm Mount Sorrell 0070 5868 Pumping Station 0066 5664 Brook Cottages 9465 8363 0158 7259 The Green 1856 Ash House 4754 Farm 0055 5251 0052 St Leonard's Church 2053 9754 0053 0053 0153 Lower Lemington Parsonage 8447 Farm 7649 3247 8949 7445 Vicarage 0045 The Leys 2643 Manor Farm Fox and 9144 Hounds 6040 6840 Ingram Close 3839 7440 Hillside Farm 0035 8635 4434 6432 Woodhills 1730 Farm 8128 A 429 4326 2025 0624 0020 A 429 8425 0022 0923 8720 Badgers Oak Farm 0022 0020 5315 6315 7417 Lemington Manor 5607 1100 A 429 1500 3600 6700 8600 1300 3800 5900 0900 5400 6800 0005 New 0002 2400 5000 6400 0001 1300 2800 7600 8800 9700 0005 3700 0001 5000 Farm 7900 0012 A 429 0900 6700 New 8600 2400 5000 6500 7600 4300 Farm 6800 0005 1300 3800 5900 0002 0005 3700 6400 0001 2800 34 8800 34 Old Farm 3700 7500 8400 0096 Dorn Priory 4989 0086 5586 0085 9383 4780 0979 Lemington Grange 5278 3378 7278 0676 2075 2973 6573 0070 0070 4969 7268 0568 2966 0666 5265 0065 0065 Upper Woodhills Farm NORTH CIRCULAR ROAD 9963 3862 4363 3160 8355 6TH AVENUE 0555 0054 5954 4953 3952 3950 8649 8946 8046 7445 Dorn Heath Farm 0042 0042 0039 9838 9835 5TH AVENUE Fire Service D AVENUE 6531 2N 8132 Technical College 5933 5931 1730 6TH AVENUE 2521 2121 9519 -
Norwegian University of Life Sciences/Connor J
Community members on contested land, park boundary marker Photo: Norwegian University of Life Sciences/Connor J. Cavanagh Suggested Citation: Cavanagh CJ, Freeman OE. 2017. Paying for carbon at Mount Elgon: two contrasting approaches at a transboundary park in East Africa. In: Namirembe S, Leimona B, van Noordwijk M, Minang P, eds. Co- investment in ecosystem services: global lessons from payment and incentive schemes. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). Chapter 28 | 1 CHAPTER 28 Paying for carbon at Mount Elgon: two contrasting approaches at a transboundary park in East Africa Connor J Cavanagh and Olivia E Freeman Highlights • We compare and contrast delivery of community benefits under two approaches to PES. • UWA-FACE provided employment; MERECP negotiated CRMAs and revolving funds. • By 2004 more than 44% of UWA-FACE forest units were compromised by encroachment. • MERECP’s community revolving funds have been met with mixed success. • Both market and fund-based PES approaches require locally-relevant benefit sharing. 28.1 Introduction Across East Africa and beyond, resource management authorities have begun to experiment with various payment for ecosystem service (PES) mechanisms for strengthening the governance of protected areas. Perhaps the most widespread of these are payment for carbon sequestration and avoided deforestation initiatives, in which finances are disbursed to forest users or managers via either trust funds or voluntary markets. Though often identified as a ‘triple win’ solution for biodiversity conservation, climate change mitigation, and socioeconomic development, such potential benefits of course will only be realized if these initiatives are sustainably designed, effectively governed, and attentive to local perceptions of social and environmental justice. -
SUMMER 2020 NEWS the Steps to Nature's Recovery Oxfordshire 2050 Plan and Nature Recovery Networks
people and nature - making connections SUMMER 2020 NEWS The steps to nature's recovery Oxfordshire 2050 Plan and Nature Recovery Networks Imagine a birds-eye view over the the River Thames and its tributaries – landscape-scale conservation. The Oxfordshire landscape, at the century’s passing over cranes and white storks Environment Bill currently going through halfway point. It is probably looking that have taken up residence among Parliament will require local authorities more wooded, and there are more groups of Exmoor ponies and English to map their local networks and prepare houses and more wind turbines. Electric longhorn cattle. Maybe bluebells have recovery strategies. Following last cars and trucks are quietly trundling spread out from the year’s ‘Colchester along the roads. But will there be more last surviving patches Declaration’, Areas of wildlife? of ancient forest into For a positive future vision Outstanding Natural Envisioning this future, perhaps naturally regenerating “ of a nature-rich landscape Beauty (AONBs) have you can make out a succession of woodlands. And people to start taking shape, action made a commitment are out and about beaver dams along the many streams to reverse the long-term loss to do likewise that are now flanked by the alders and enjoying natural parks (landscapesforlife.org.uk). willows planted in the 2020s to help with thriving wildlife, of nature will be needed So, there is now slow floodwaters? Curlews may be just a short walk from significant momentum flying over floodplain grasslands beside -
Street Furniture Listing Selection Guide Summary
Street Furniture Listing Selection Guide Summary Historic England’s twenty listing selection guides help to define which historic buildings are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. Listing has been in place since 1947 and operates under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. If a building is felt to meet the necessary standards, it is added to the List. This decision is taken by the Government’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). These selection guides were originally produced by English Heritage in 2011: slightly revised versions are now being published by its successor body, Historic England. The DCMS‘ Principles of Selection for Listing Buildings set out the over-arching criteria of special architectural or historic interest required for listing and the guides provide more detail of relevant considerations for determining such interest for particular building types. See https:// www.gov.uk/government/publications/principles-of-selection-for-listing-buildings. Each guide falls into two halves. The first defines the types of structures included in it, before going on to give a brisk overview of their characteristics and how these developed through time, with notice of the main architects and representative examples of buildings. The second half of the guide sets out the particular tests in terms of its architectural or historic interest a building has to meet if it is to be listed. A select bibliography gives suggestions for further reading. This guide looks at the several categories of street furniture. The first comprises objects connected with the highways including street surfaces, pavements, bollards, street lighting and milestones.